+ All Categories
Home > Documents > SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND MODELING

SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND MODELING

Date post: 29-Nov-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
INTRODUCTION Triage Consultation / Diagnosis / Test Treatment Disposition KPI1: Time to 1st Consultation KPI2: Total Length of Stay in ED PROCESS FLOW AND KPIS IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM STATEMENT The Emergency Department is under-performing due to: increase in patient volume, and changing patient composition. System symptoms: Space congestion, lengthy stay, long wait time for doctors, etc. PROJECT OBJECTIVES a) Conduct systemic investigation to understand the system dynamics b) Model the system through simulation analysis c) Propose improvement policies to improve KPI performance KPI2: Total Length of Stay in ED Insufficient doctors and nurses High turnover results in frequent new nurse re-training, impacting efficiency & productivity Medical Officers (MOs) requiring decision oversight put burden on senior doctor manpower Long tests result in waiting time & insert pressure on bed resources Decision priority: clearing up current patients vs. taking up new patients Long waiting time to consultation results in congestion Only one (shared) ECG machine Limited area for beds & lack of bed area arrangement result in congestion SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND MODELING MANPOWER PROCESS F ACILITY & EQUIPMENT S YSTEM INVESTIGATION Patient arrival rates Activity durations Resource level Manpower Schedule Resource availability D ATA ANALYSIS SIMULATION Patient Demographics Patient Diagnosis Activity occurrence probability MODEL VERIFICATION Benchmark 1: Time to 1st Consultation Benchmark 2: Total Length of Stay in ED Benchmark 3: Number of Patient in ED PROJECT SCOPE Long Term Aspects and Solutions: Manpower Increase & Facility Redesign Focus on Short Term & Cost Efficient System Aspects for P2 patients (High cost, Low Feasibility, Long Lead Time) SOLUTION TESTING DISCUSSION Easy implementation Moderately long implementation time due to nurse training Error in test orders will incur extra costs. As triage nurses become more experienced over time, over ordering cases will decrease DISCUSSION Directly ease congestion Improvements on KPIs Cost for additional beds and EOW renovation is acceptable Long implementation time Relatively hard to implement DISCUSSION Best improvement on KPIs Does not incur additional cost Nurse-patient ratio is maintained at all times Quick implementation Rescheduling needs nurses’ adaptability ADVANCED DECISION AT TRIAGE IN-P ATIENT BED ARRANGEMENT NURSE RESCHEDULING PROBLEM SITUATION: long turnaround time and late ordering for blood test result in long ED stay PROBLEM SITUATION: admitted patients need to spend long bed waiting time, causing congestion PROBLEM SITUATION: changing patient volume results in higher nurse utilization during peak hours TESTED SCENARIOS: advancing blood test ordering, by 30%/50%/70% of patients during peak hours. (Increase in blood test demand due to incorrect decision to order by 5%, 10%) TESTED SENARIOS: Percentage reduction in time is predicted if bottle neck is reduced by 10%/25%/40%. TESTED SENARIOS: rescheduling nurse level to fit demand change CONCLUSION 1% 2% 15% 2% 4% 13% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 30% 25% 40% Time to first consult Total length of stay Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs -2% -3% -5% 3% 0% 3% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 30% 50% 70% Time to first consult Total length of stay Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs 30% reduction 14% reduction KPI1: Time to 1st Consultation 1.0 0.5 0 400 800 1200 1.0 0.5 0 200 400 0 50 Simulation Data Actual Data Simulation data Actual data Simulation data Actual data DISCUSSION It is most optimal to add 1 ECG machine. Acceptable cost Very short implementation time Immediate but low impact on KPIs. ECG MACHINE ADDITION PROBLEM SITUATION: more than 65% of P2 patients sharing only one ECG machine TESTED SCENARIOS: add 1, 2, or 3 machines Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs 2% reduction 1% reduction NEXT RECOMMENDATIONS The improvement policies are recommended in the following ranking Rescheduling nurse level to fit demand change Advancing blood test ordering, by 30% of patients during peak hours Improve bed arrangement to reduce bed waiting time by 40% Adding one more ECG machine to system FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF STUDY Study and plan for long-term and large-scale improvement policies such as increase in manpower, facility revamp, etc. Use design of experiment techniques to test out the main interaction effects between the four short term improvement policies SIMULATION MODELING FOR I MPROVING PRE-HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT Team Members: Guo Yueheng, Lim Fang Wen, Ooi Hui Ping, Tian Yu, Zhu Jin NUS Supervisors: Associate Prof Lee Loo Hay, Assistant Prof Huang Boray SGH Supervisors: Dr. Sean Lam, Dr. Rajagopal Lakshmanan Mohanavalli, Mr. Zhang Ji
Transcript
Page 1: SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND MODELING

INTRODUCTION

Triage Consultation /

Diagnosis / Test Treatment Disposition

KPI1: Time to 1st Consultation

KPI2: Total Length of Stay in ED

PROCESS FLOW AND KPIS IDENTIFICATION PROBLEM STATEMENT The Emergency Department is under-performing due to: increase in patient volume, and changing patient composition. System symptoms: Space congestion, lengthy stay, long wait time for doctors, etc.

PROJECT OBJECTIVES a) Conduct systemic investigation to understand the system dynamics b) Model the system through simulation analysis c) Propose improvement policies to improve KPI performance

KPI2: Total Length of Stay in ED

Insufficient doctors and nurses

High turnover results in frequent new nurse re-training, impacting efficiency & productivity

Medical Officers (MOs) requiring decision oversight put burden on senior doctor manpower

Long tests result in waiting time & insert pressure on bed resources

Decision priority: clearing up current patients vs. taking up new patients

Long waiting time to consultation results in congestion

Only one (shared) ECG machine

Limited area for beds & lack of bed area arrangement result in congestion

SYSTEM INVESTIGATION AND MODELING

MANPOWER

PROCESS

FACILITY & EQUIPMENT

SYSTEM INVESTIGATION

Patient arrival rates

Activity durations

Resource level

Manpower Schedule

Resource availability

DATA ANALYSIS SIMULATION

Patient Demographics

Patient Diagnosis

Activity occurrence probability

MODEL VERIFICATION Benchmark 1: Time to 1st Consultation

Benchmark 2: Total Length of Stay in ED

Benchmark 3: Number of Patient in ED

PROJECT SCOPE

Long Term Aspects and Solutions: Manpower Increase & Facility Redesign

Focus on Short Term & Cost Efficient System Aspects for P2 patients

(High cost, Low Feasibility, Long Lead Time)

SOLUTION TESTING

DISCUSSION • Easy implementation •Moderately long implementation time due to

nurse training • Error in test orders will incur extra costs. • As triage nurses become more experienced

over time, over ordering cases will decrease

DISCUSSION •Directly ease congestion •Improvements on KPIs •Cost for additional beds and EOW renovation is acceptable •Long implementation time •Relatively hard to implement

DISCUSSION • Best improvement on KPIs •Does not incur additional cost •Nurse-patient ratio is maintained at all times •Quick implementation • Rescheduling needs nurses’ adaptability

ADVANCED DECISION AT TRIAGE IN-PATIENT BED ARRANGEMENT NURSE RESCHEDULING

PROBLEM SITUATION: long turnaround time and late ordering for blood test result in long ED stay

PROBLEM SITUATION: admitted patients need to spend long bed waiting time, causing congestion

PROBLEM SITUATION: changing patient volume results in higher nurse utilization during peak hours

TESTED SCENARIOS: advancing blood test ordering, by 30%/50%/70% of patients during peak hours. (Increase in blood test demand due to incorrect decision to order by 5%, 10%)

TESTED SENARIOS: Percentage reduction in time is predicted if bottle neck is reduced by 10%/25%/40%.

TESTED SENARIOS: rescheduling nurse level to fit demand change

CONCLUSION

1% 2%

15%

2% 4%

13%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

30% 25% 40%

Time to first consult

Total length of stay

Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs

-2% -3%

-5%

3%

0%

3%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

30% 50% 70%

Time to first consult

Total length of stay

Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs

30% reduction

14% reduction

KPI1: Time to 1st Consultation

1.0

0.5

0 400 800 1200

1.0

0.5

0 200 400

0

50

Simulation Data Actual Data

Simulation data Actual data

Simulation data Actual data

DISCUSSION •It is most optimal to add 1 ECG machine. •Acceptable cost •Very short implementation time •Immediate but low impact on KPIs.

ECG MACHINE ADDITION

PROBLEM SITUATION: more than 65% of P2 patients sharing only one ECG machine

TESTED SCENARIOS: add 1, 2, or 3 machines

Test scenarios’ Impact on the KPIs

2% reduction

1% reduction

NEXT

RECOMMENDATIONS The improvement policies are recommended in the following ranking Rescheduling nurse level to fit demand change Advancing blood test ordering, by 30% of patients during peak hours Improve bed arrangement to reduce bed waiting time by 40% Adding one more ECG machine to system

FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF STUDY Study and plan for long-term and large-scale improvement policies such as increase in manpower, facility revamp, etc. Use design of experiment techniques to test out the main interaction effects between the four short term improvement policies

SIMULATION MODELING FOR IMPROVING

PRE-HOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE

IE3100R SYSTEMS DESIGN PROJECT

Team Members: Guo Yueheng, Lim Fang Wen, Ooi Hui Ping, Tian Yu, Zhu Jin

NUS Supervisors: Associate Prof Lee Loo Hay, Assistant Prof Huang Boray

SGH Supervisors: Dr. Sean Lam, Dr. Rajagopal Lakshmanan Mohanavalli, Mr. Zhang Ji

Recommended