Date post: | 15-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | david-m-cronin |
View: | 646 times |
Download: | 0 times |
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Overview Of INCOSE Tool Vendor Challenge
http://www.incose.org/symp2008/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=68&Itemid=134
Using Cognition Cockpit Version 5.3(A Web 2.0 Application)
(As presented by Cognition as part of a Systems Engineering challenge for a simulated total system)
“NotilHotel Parking System”
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
1. General Background
NotilHotels is a world-wide hotel chain with head-offices in Paris, specializing in low-cost, high valued business hotels in city centers around the world. Each hotel has some space for parking, but the space is often occupied by people working in nearby offices, causing arriving guests not to find space for parking their car near the hotel. In order to secure parking space for their guests, they plan to develop an automated parking system that can regulate the use of the limited parking space.
INCOSE Challenge Problem Statement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
2. The requirements specified by the management are:
-One or two parking lots per hotel
-Optimum service to hotel guests
-User-friendly, minimum hassle operation
-Payment of a reasonable parking fee included in the hotel bill, or payable separately
-Easily adaptable to the local environment, because there are hotels in 50 different countries
-In case there is more space than expected guests on a given day, the remaining parking space is to be made available to non-guests, in order to maximize revenues
- The system must be operational at the opening of their newest hotel January 25, XXXX
INCOSE Challenge Problem Statement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
3. Vendors are asked to provide the following:
-Compose the system specification
-Demonstrate requirements handling
-Define the system in its environment
-Define logical sub-systems, flows from sub-systems to the environment and flows between sub-systems
-Define sub-system activities
-Don’t forget to include the particularities of the human sub-systems (=humans) that are part of the total system
-Describe the functional modes of the system and transfers between them
-Draw a timeline for the development of the system
- Show how your tool supports the System Engineering activities
INCOSE Challenge Problem Statement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
4. Questions to the Customer
From Thursday June 12th, participants may send “questions to the customer” ([email protected]). We (the customer) will do our best to answer these questions to all contact persons about once a day. However, the customer may have to think for some time about some questions and may have no good answer to some questions. Just a typical customer.
At the symposium, the Challenge and the questions (if any) will be posted on the designated Tool Vendor Challenge notice board. Questions may be submitted until Monday (June XX) 17:30. Questions should state the organization asking the question. All challenge participants and (at the Symposium) all conference attendees will be able to see all the questions and the answers.
INCOSE Challenge Problem Statement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Schematic View Of Cognition Cockpit
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Cu
sto
mer
/B
usi
nes
s R
equ
irem
ents
Cu
sto
mer
Nee
ds
Val
idat
ion
Tes
tsSys
tem
/Pro
du
ct
Req
uir
emen
ts
Su
b-S
yste
m, C
om
po
nen
t &
Pro
cess
Req
uir
emen
ts
Sys
tem
Ris
ks
Use
r H
azar
ds
Ver
ific
atio
n
Tes
ts
Fai
lure
Mo
des
...
Bu
sin
ess
Nee
ds
Oth
er
Infl
uen
cers
Automatic Status Tracking, WorkflowStates & Reporting
Transfer Function Definition,Cpk/PNC Computation, Monte Carlo, DOE, etc.
Version Control, Baselining, Visual Differencing, Markups, Action Items, etc.
Concept Selection, Pugh, Benchmarking, Voting, Attachments, ElectronicNotebooks, QFD, etc.
Meeting Minutes,Interview Guides,Electronic AffinityDiagramming (KJ)
LEAN EXECUTIONAND FULL TRACEABILITY
COMPLIANT FORMATTING& AUTOMATIC PREPARATION
OF PDP DELIVERABLES
PREDEFINED OR CUSTOMDATA-FLOW THROUGH PDP STEPS
...One or more system/user-definedPDP templates or worksheets
Data flow fromtemplate to template
Legend:
VOC/VOB/...Requirements
Definition & Weighting
VOC/VOB/...Requirements
Definition & Weighting
Hazard Assessment
and Mitigation Planning
Hazard Assessment
and Mitigation Planning
SystemRequirements
Definition,Documentation& Prioritization
SystemRequirements
Definition,Documentation& Prioritization
Test Plans& TraceMatrices
Test Plans& TraceMatrices
Risk Plans, FTA & SystemFMEA
Risk Plans, FTA & SystemFMEA
Flow-down to Sub-System
RequirementsIncluding CPM
Flow-down to Sub-System
RequirementsIncluding CPM
Sub-SystemVerification
Test Protocols& TraceMatrices
Sub-SystemVerification
Test Protocols& TraceMatrices
Sub-System,Component& Process
FMEAs
Sub-System,Component& Process
FMEAs
Automatically Generate Process Steps & Documents
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Conduct Customer InterviewsBuilt In MS Word Templates To Import Into Our Project
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
KJ Analysis / Affinity On Customer InputsHere Are Your Inputs Organized With Electronics “Sticky Notes”
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Team Voting on Voices / Requirements ScoresYour Three Top Managers Voted On Customer Input Rankings
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Rank Voices / RequirementsWe Used The Inputs And Voting To Prioritize The Customer Inputs
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Process & Data FlowWe Used Embedded Visio To Map The Project Data Flows
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Model The Use Cases: Use Visio Embedded In CockpitIncluding Version Control And History Of The Visio Files
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Model The Use Cases: Create Directly In CockpitHere Is The Use Case For A Car Approaching The Gate From Outside
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatically Generate Requirements DocumentationWe Will Have Cockpit Create Your Documents
Create NewDocument / Deliverable
Choose From Template Library
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Your Current System Requirements Document
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Your Requirements Document In “PRD” Format
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Your Requirements Document In “MIL STD 961E” Format
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatically Generated Deliverables On Your Web Site
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Link Inputs / Voices To Specific Requirements For TraceUse The Standard Template To Create The Trace Relationships
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Competitive Assessment Of Project PerformanceComparing You To Your Competitors
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
House Of Quality To Prioritize RequirementsMapping Your System Requirements To The Customer Inputs
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatic Trace: Voices To RequirementsConfirming All Customer Inputs Have A System Requirement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatic Trace: Requirements To VoicesConfirming All System Requirements Have A Customer Input
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
The First House Of Quality With Excel Embedded In Cockpit
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Pugh Concept SelectionRanking Your Two Main Concepts Against Customer Inputs
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Flowdown / Cascade Requirements And SpecificationsDefining Your Lower Level Requirements
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Test PlansWe Automatically Created Your Test Protocols
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Test PlansWe Automatically Created Your V & V Plan
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Real Time System Trace MatrixChecking The Trace: Inputs-Requirements-Specs-Tests
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Statistical Analysis Of Critical ParametersWe Will Now Analyze Some Of The Most Critical Requirements
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
32
Transfer Function Overview
Popular Methods for Developing Transfer Functions
Explicit Engineering Equations
Experiments; DOE & Monte Carlo (Physical & Simulated)
Testing: Regression Analysis (Physical Only)
“Black Box” Application Software Tools
Company “Tribal Knowledge”
Transfer Functions are Required for Predictive Engineering
Calculate nominal output value given a set of inputs
y = f(x1, x2, … xn)
or
Y = f( x, y, n)
Where: x = input specs, y = subordinate results, n = noise
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Statistical Analysis Of A Requirement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatic Change Notification Of Numeric ChangesIf Your Booking Rate Goes Up . . .
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
This Requirement Will Improve: Note New Cpk
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Status Summary Report Of “My Requirements”A Sub Team Is Monitoring Their Requirements’ Performance
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Critical Parameter Management (CPM)Let’s Check Who Is Causing This Requirement To Miss Its Target
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Cockpit’s Mind Map ModeSome People Like To Work In A Graphical Layout
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
You Can Modify Your Requirements In Mind Map ModeFeel Free To Explore, Change, And “What If” Various Configuraitons
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Scorecard With Requirement StatusHere Is Statistical Data On An Important Requirement
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Design And Test Values For A RequirementLet’s Look Even Deeper To Learn More
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Design Margin Plot For A RequirementWe Can Look Real Time At This Requirement’s Behavior
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Statistical Analysis Gives Us A Holistic Perspective
Prioritize Requirements and Critical Parameters. Identify possible hot spots early in the process. Reduce cost by eliminating over design.
Opportunity(over-design)
Risk
X’s
Y’s
Y’s
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
FMEA And Risk PlansWe Created A System FMEA For Your Project
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Associate Risks/Failures With RequirementsWe Can Tell You Which Requirements Have Which Failure Modes
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Scoring The Causes In An FMEA Flowdown ExerciseHere Are Your Project’s Biggest Possible Causes Of Failures
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatically Generated FMEA ReportWe Have Risks, Causes, Mitigations, And Design Controls For You
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Discovery Session Primary ToolsWe Have Combined Your Risks With Your Requirements
Both Methods/Tools Capture Engineering “Tribal Knowledge”
Radar Project
Requirements Management Flow Down
Applied to “Optimistic” Requirements
EX: How do we ensure an easy walk to the car? How can we maximize space usage?
System
SubsystemSubsystem
VendorComp Comp Mat’l
Design Failure Modes& Effects Analysis (DFMEA)
Applied to “Pessimistic” Requirements
EX: What happens if a person forgets their card? What security problems might we have?
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Cost Rollup And Cost TrackingHere Are The Cost Metrics For The Project
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Cost ReportsWhat Are The Key Cost Drivers For The Entry Gate?
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Cost Waterfall ChartAre We Trending Towards Our Cost Goals For This System?
© 2009 Cognition Corporation
™
Automatic Graphical Trace For A RequirementHere Is The Graphic Mode Again Showing Some Of The Links