No. 13-1339
1ln tbe $wrtme @rurt of tlle @rlitgù åtrted
SPOKIIO, INC''PE{TroNER,
THOMASROBINS,. RESPoNDENT.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Courtof Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
. BRIEF oF AI,ABAMA. CoLoRADo, IIhCHIGAN,. .
NEBTqAS&A, TENÑESSEE, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCoNSIN,AND IryYoMING As Amcr Cunr¡r rN SUPPoRT oF
PETITIoNER
July 9, 2015
Luther StiangeAlabøma Atørnq, Gen eral
Ani]rèY\¡ t. Brasher . .
lSo!ícitor Generø\,Cgunsgl of !eco*,, .
Brett J. TaìieyD epuiy S olícitor G en er aI
O¡'rrco or ruo Ai¡neue .
AtronNoy Gnxrn¡r-501 Washington Ave.Montgor.n ery; 4L 36130(334).242-73O0,abrasher@agg : state: al:usAounsel for Amici .Curiae
[additional.counsèl listeil on iusidè cover]
Uyn
thÉ
Uof
iman
Cål
orad
o At
torn
ey G
ener
alR
alph
L. C
arr C
olor
ado
ljl:]ll
':lìJù
di¿i
ârid
ènÌe
r . .
'':
1300
Bro
adw
ay,
10th
Fl.
Den
ver,
CO
802
03(7
20) 5
08-6
000
¡: ,, , i Bi
lI Sc
huet
te'"r
rl ,'
.'Mic
Ïigad
ìttto
rley
Gen
e.ra
lP.
O. B
ox 3
0212
.ì :r.
rita
n'si
ng, M
I 489
09:
@rz
¡'373
-111
¡ '
Dou
glas
J. P
eter
son
. . N
ebra
skaA
ütom
ey G
ener
al21
,15
Stat
e C
apito
lBu
ildin
gLi
ncol
n, N
E 68
509
(402
) 47
t-268
3 ,
Her
bert
H. S
late
ry II
I.
Tenn
esse
e At
torn
ey G
erre
ral
425
5th
Aven
ue N
ôrth
,'
Nas
hville
, TN
3?0
27(6
75) 7
47-3
491.
Patrr
c.k
-Lvl
orns
ey .
.
Wes
tMai
niaA
torn
e5,
Gen
æl
1900
Kan
awhâ
.Blv
d. E
'C
harle
ston
,'WV
.2õ3
05(3
04) 5
58-2
021
Brad
D. S
chim
elW
isco
nsin
Atto
rney
Gen
eral
17 W
. Mai
n St
reet
Mad
ison
, WI 5
3707
(608
) 266
-722
7
Pete
r K. M
icha
elW
yom
ing
Atto
rney
Gen
eral
123
Cap
itol B
uild
ing
Che
yenn
e; U
aY 8
2002
(3O
7) 7
77-7
847
I
QU
ESTI
oN P
RES
ENTE
D
May
Con
gres
s co
nfer
Arti
cle
III st
andi
ng u
pon
a pl
aint
iff w
ho s
uffe
rs n
o co
ncre
te h
arm
, and
who
ther
efor
e co
uld
not o
ther
wis
e in
voke
the
juris
dict
ion
of a
fede
ral c
ourt,
by
auth
oriz
ing
a pr
ivat
e rig
ht o
fac
tion
base
d on
a b
are
viol
atio
n of
a fe
dera
l sta
tute
?
QU
ESTI
oN P
RES
ENTE
D
TABLÐ
oF
AurH
oRIT
lEs
t1
TABL
E oF
' CO
NTE
NTS
INTR
oDU
crro
N A
ND
INTE
RES
T oF
AM
Icr
CU
RIÀ
E....
......
1
SuÀi
tr\4A
ÌY o
F AR
GU
MEN
T
AIG
(IMEN
TI.
The
Stat
es h
ave
a st
rong
inte
rest
in
A. T
he ø
míc
i Sta
tes
have
bor
new
itnes
s to
the
mag
nitu
de o
f abu
seth
e cl
ass
actio
n ca
n in
vite
......
......
... ..
......
...7
B. M
any
stat
es re
cogn
izec
l th
e pr
oble
man
d, to
geth
er w
ith C
ongr
ess
and
the
judi
ciar
y, im
plem
ente
d re
form
s ...
......
.....
10
IL L
ower
cou
rt de
cisi
ons
wea
keni
ng th
ein
jury
-in-fa
ct r
equi
rem
ent
have
ups
et th
eba
lanc
e of
our
judi
cial
sys
tem
.....
......
.. ...
......
......
72A.
Our
Con
stitu
tion
and
judi
cial
syst
em c
reat
e a
bala
nce
betw
een
secu
ring
the
right
of t
he in
jure
d to
rece
ive
rest
itutio
n an
d pr
otec
ting
defe
ndan
ts f
rom
abu
sive
litig
atio
n....
......
1 3
B. T
he s
tatu
tory
-dam
ages
cla
ss a
ctio
nan
d th
e ef
fect
ive
elim
inat
ion
of th
ein
jury
-in-fa
ct r
equi
rem
ent h
ave
upse
t the
bal
ance
....
......
......
......
......
......
...15
C.
Wea
keni
ng th
e in
jury
-ir-fa
ctre
quire
nent
col
laps
es th
e st
andi
ng
ensu
ring
a ba
lanc
ed le
gal s
yste
m
tv ..o
III. T
he C
ourt
reite
ratin
gac
tual
har
m
1Il
anal
ysis
and
the
test
for c
lass
-act
ion
certi
ficat
ion
A. A
pro
per
appl
icat
ion
of th
e in
jury
-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent
will
eiim
inat
e
can
rest
ore
bala
nce
byth
at in
jury
in fa
ct re
quire
s
B. A
rob
ust s
tand
ing
help
s ac
com
plis
h,hi
nder
s, th
e go
als
unfa
ir w
i¡dfa
li cl
ass
actio
ns..
CoN
CLU
SToNda
mag
es la
ws
..
l7
requ
irem
ent
rath
er th
anof
sta
tuto
ry-
....2
0 21.
24 31
Cas
es
AT&,
T M
obilit
y LL
C u
. Con
cepc
ion,
lV
TABL
E oF
AU
THoB
ITIE
S
131
S. C
r. 77
40 (2
07t).
..Ba
tem
øn u
. Am
eric
an M
ulti-
Cín
ema,
Inc.
,62
3 F.
3d 7
08 (g
th C
ir. 2
010)
Beeg
al u
. Par
k W
. GaI
Iery
,92
5 A.
zd 6
84 (N
.J. 2
007)
.....
......
......
......
......
......
....1
1Be
nn u
. Ban
cBos
ton,
No.
3:9
6-C
V-09
74-J
OI.D
. Tex
. Oct
. 4,
19e6
)BM
W o
f N. A
m.,
Inc.
u. G
ore,
517
U.S
. 559
(199
6)
Com
cast
Cor
p. u
. Beh
,rend
,,13
3 S.
Ct.
7426
(20
73)..
..
Com
paq
Com
pute
r C
orp.
u. L
aprø
y,13
5 S.
W.3
d 65
7 (T
ex. 2
004)
......
......
......
......
......
.....
11
Coo
pers
& L
ybra
nd,
u. L
iues
ay,
437
U.S
. 463
(197
8).
Don
oghu
e u.
Bul
ld.o
g In
uest
ors
Gen
. P'sh
íp,
696
F.3d
170
(2d
Cir.
20L
2)...
......
......
......
......
......
..22
Duh
es u
. Wal
-Mar
t, In
c.,
509
F.3d
116
8 (g
th C
ír.2O
07),
reu'
d.,
Wøl
-Mar
t Sto
res,
Inc.
u. D
uhes
,73L
S.
1t)
vEx
par
te A
m. B
anhe
rs L
ife A
ssur
. Co.
of
Fla.
,
ct.2
547
(20r
L)..
Dur
a Ph
arm
., In
c. u
. Bro
ud,o
,54
4 U
.S. 3
36 (2
005)
......
......
715
So. 2
d 18
6 (A
la. 1
997)
.Ex
par
te C
itico
rp A
ccep
tanc
e C
o., I
nc.,
715
So. 2
d 19
9 (A
Ia. 1
997)
.....
Gra
ham
Cnt
y. S
oiI &
Wat
er C
onse
ruat
ion
Dis
t. u.
U.S
. er r
el. W
ilson
,55
9 U
.S. 2
80 (2
010)
....
Ham
mer
u. S
am's
8., I
nc.,
754
F.3d
492
(9th
úr.2
0t4)
cer
t. d,
enie
d.,
135
S. C
r. 11
75 (2
015)
......
...
......
....2
2
ltt
Hec
hler
u. C
hane
y,47
0 U
.S. 8
21 (1
985)
..
Hof
fman
et a
I. u.
Ban
cBos
ton
Mor
tg. C
orp.
,N
o. C
V-91
-188
0 (A
la. C
ir. C
t., J
an.2
4,19
94)
Kam
ílew
icz
u. B
anh
of B
osto
n C
orp.
,92
F.3
d 50
6 (7
th C
ir. 1
996)
Leys
oto
u. M
ama
Mia
I., I
nc-,
255
F.R
.D. 6
93 (S
.D. F
la. 2
009)
......
.. ...
......
......
......
26Li
nd,a
R.S
. u. R
ich.
ard,
D.,
......
......
..74
410
U.S
. 614
Ge7
3)Lo
pez
u. K
B To
ys R
etai
l, In
c.,
No.
CV
07-1
44-J
FW (
CW
x) (
C.D
. Ca1
.Ju
Iy 1
8, 2
007)
......
......
......
......
.Lu
jan
u. D
efen
d,er
s of
Wild
,Iife
,50
4 u.
s. 5
55 (1
992)
to
.8, I
pass
im
viM
cRey
nold
s u.
Mer
riII L
ynch
, Pie
rce,
Fenn
er &
Sm
ith, I
nc.,
672
F.3d
482
(7th
Cír.
20L2
) ..
Mitc
hell
u. H
& R
Blo
ch. I
nc..
783
So. 2
d 81
2 (A
la. 2
000)
Mur
ray
u. G
MAC
Mor
tg. C
orp.
,43
4 F.
3d 9
48 (7
th C
ir. 2
006)
.....
......
......
......
....1
8, 2
0
Park
er u
. Tim
e W
arne
r En
tm't
Co.
, L.P
.,33
1 F.
3d 1
3 (2
d cù
. 2oo
3)
Philli
ps P
etro
leum
Co.
u. S
hutts
,47
2 U
.S. 7
97 (1
985)
......
..
Rai
nes
u. B
yrd,
521
U.S
. 811
(199
7)..
Ram
sey
u. N
estle
Wat
ers
N. A
m.,
Inc.
d/b/
ø Po
land
Spr
ing
Wat
er C
o.,
No.
03
CH
K 81
7 (I1
1. C
ir. C
t., N
ov. 5
,20
03)..
Rob
ins
u. S
pohe
o, In
c.,
7 42
F.3
d 40
9 (g
th C
tr. 2
O74
) cer
t.gr
ante
d, 1
35 S
. Ct.
1,89
2 (2
015)
......
......
......
......
.....
17
Safe
co In
s- C
o. o
f Am
. u. B
urr,
551
U.S
. 47
(200
7)...
.
Scot
t u. B
lock
bust
er In
c.,
No.
DI6
2-53
5, (J
effe
rson
Cnt
y., T
ex.,...
......
......
......
74
vii
Shad
y G
roue
Orth
oped
,íc A
ssoc
íate
s, P
.A. u
.
Sem
inol
e C
nty.
u. T
ivol
i. O
rlønd
.o A
ssoc
s.Lt
d.,
920
So. 2
d 81
8 (F
Ia. D
ist.
Ct.
App.
200
6)...
......
.....1
1
Alls
tate
Ins.
Co.
,55
9 U
.S. 3
93 (
2010
)..
Sier
ra C
Iub
u. M
orto
n,
24
405
U.S
. 727
(797
2)
Sony
Cor
p. o
f Am
. u. U
niue
rsal
City
Stud
ios,
Inc.
,46
4 U
.S. 4
17 (1
984)
......
..
Stan
dard
Fire
Ins.
Co.
u. K
now
les,
133
S. C
t. 13
45 (2
013)
..
Stillm
och
u. W
eis
Mar
hets
, In
c.,
385
F. A
pp'x
267 ( t
h C
ir. 2
010)
......
......
......
......
...15
Sum
mer
s u.
Ear
th Is
land
. Ins
t.,
..18
..10
555
U.S
. 488
(200
9)..
Tayl
or u
. Acx
iom
Cor
pora
tion,
No.
2:0
7-cv
-000
1 (E
.D. T
ex. J
an. 4
, 200
7)...
......
....2
7To
urge
rnøn
u. C
ollin
s Fi
n. S
erus
., In
c.,
755
F.3d
110
9 (9
th C
ir. 2
014)
..
..1tr
Tran
s U
nion
LLC
u. F
eder
al T
rad,
eC
omm
'n,
536
U.S
. 915
(200
2)...
.....
......
......
...16
Vølle
y Fo
rge
Chr
istia
n C
olI.
u. A
mer
ican
sU
nite
d fo
r Sep
arat
ion
of C
hurc
h, &
2t
Stat
e, In
c.,
454
U.S
. 464
(198
2)...
Verm
ont A
genc
y of
Nat
ural
Res
.re
l. St
euen
s,52
9 U
.S. 7
65 (2
000)
......
......
......
22
u. U
.S. e
x
......
......
......
......
75,
2929
viü
Wal
-Mar
t St
ores
, Inc
. u. D
ukes
,13
1 S.
Ct.
254t
(20t
7)...
...
......
.12,
18
War
th u
. Sel
d,in
,42
2u.s
.49O
(197
5)
Stat
utes
15 U
.S.C
. S 1
681
.
15 u
.s.c
. s 1
692
ALA.
CoD
E S
6-5-
641
....
CoL
o. R
Ev. S
rAr.
S 13
-20-
901
......
......
......
..G
A. C
oDEA
NN
. S
9-11
-23.
......
...KA
N. S
rAr.
ANN
. $ 6
0-22
3....
.....
LA. C
oDE
Crv
. PR
oc. A
NN
. arts
. 591
-97.
..M
o. R
Ev. S
rAr.
$ 51
2.02
OH
Io R
EV. C
oDE
ANN
. STE
N'N
. C
oDE
Ar\'N
. S 2
7 -7
-725
2r,2
2,23
TEx.
Cv.
PR
.{c.
& R
EM. C
oDÐ
S 2
6.00
1 et
seq.
....
TEx.
Cw
Rul
es
FED
. R. C
IV. P
. 23
0
. PR
Ao. &
REM
. CoD
E S
51.0
14
2505
.02
Sup.
Ct.
R. 3
7
l)tLe
sisl
ativ
e H
isto
rv14
9 C
ong.
Rec
. 277
34 (2
003)
......
......
.. ...
......
......
..25,
26
11 72 72 72 11 L2 72 72
Con
stitu
tiona
l Pro
vísi
ons
U.S
. CoN
sr. a
rt. II
I, $
2, c
I. 1.
......
......
......
.
H.B
. 4 (T
ex. 2
003)
.H
.B. 1
027
(CoI
o. 2
003)
H.B
. 121
1 (M
o. 2
004)
..
......
....1
1
H.B
. 394
(Ohi
o 19
98)
..72
..19
H.B
. 4, 7
8 Le
g. R
eg. S
ess.
(Te
x. 2
003)
......
......
......
....1
S. R
ep. N
o. 1
09-1
4 (F
eb. 2
8, 2
005)
......
......
......
......
....1
S.B.
19
(Ga.
200
5)..
Oth
er A
utho
ritie
s
......
......
..14
AM. T
oRl R
EFoR
M A
SS,N
, 2O
74I2
OL5
JLD
rcur
HEL
LHoL
ES (2
015)
..
......
72
Barry
Mei
er, M
ath
of a
Cla
ss-A
ctio
n Su
it:W
inni
ng' $
2.19
Cos
¿s ,Í
91.3
3, N
.Y.
..r2
......
r2...
...11
......
L2
TruB
s, N
ov. 2
L, 7
995
Bloc
hbus
ter S
ettle
s Lø
te-fe
e Su
ít w
íthC
ertif
icøt
e Pl
øn, H
oUST
oN C
HR
oN.,
Jan
73,2
002
Eddi
e C
urra
n, Y
ou W
in, Y
ou P
ay, M
oBtt,
E
..72
Rnc
. (Al
a.),
Dec
. 29,
799
9Ed
war
d D
. Mur
phy,
Pol
and,
Spr
ing
Settl
esPU
TíTy
Sui
T, P
OR
TI,A
ND
PR
ESS
HER
ATÐ
,
1 0 2
Nov
. 6, 2
003
10
xH
olly
S. H
osfo
rd, -
Auol
ding
Ann
ih,íl
atio
n:W
hy T
rial J
udge
s Sh
ould
. Ref
use
toC
ertif
y A
?AC
TA C
lass
Act
ion
for
Stat
utor
y D
amag
es W
h,er
e th
,e R
ecou
ery
Wou
ld L
í.hel
y Le
aue
the
Def
enda
ntFa
cíng
Imm
ínen
t In
solu
ency
, 81
MIs
s.L.
J. 1
947
(201
2) ..
......
......
...
......
.....1
9Jo
hn C
. Cof
fee,
Jr.,
Res
cuin
g th
e Pr
iuat
eAt
torn
ey G
ener
al: W
hy th
e M
od,e
l of t
heLa
wye
r As
Bou
nty
Hun
ter
Is N
otW
orhi
ng,4
2 M
D. L
. REv
. 215
(198
3)..
John
H. B
eisn
er,
Mat
thew
Sho
rs, J
essi
caD
avid
son
Mile
r, C
lass
Act
ion
"Cop
s":
Publ
ic S
erua
nts
or P
ríuøt
eEn
trepr
eneu
rs?,
57
STAN
. L. R
EV. 1
441
(200
5)...
......
......
...
......
......
......
...27
, 28
John
S. H
addo
ck, A
rticu
latín
g A
"Rat
íona
lC
onne
ctio
n" R
equi
rem
ent i
n Ar
ticle
III
Støn
ding
,66
SrAN
. L. R
EV. 1
423
(201
4)
Løw
yers
Get
$1.
5 M
illion
, Clíe
nts
Get
50
Cen
ts O
ff , F
uLro
N C
ouN
w D
AILY
REP
.,N
ov. 2
1, 1
997
Ric
hard
A. N
agar
eda,
,Agg
rega
ti,on
and
. Its
Dis
cont
ents
: C
lass
Set
tlem
ent P
ress
ure,
Cla
ss-W
id,e
Arb
itrat
íon,
ønd
CAF
A, 7
O6
CoL
uM.
L. R
EV. 1
872
(200
6)
Shei
la B
. Sch
euer
man
, D
ue P
roce
ssFo
rgot
ten:
The
Pro
blem
of S
tatu
tory
Dar
nage
s øn
d C
lass
Act
ions
, 7 4
Mo.
L.
rri
SITE
SEL
ECTI
oN, T
oP T
EN B
USI
NES
SC
LTM
ATES
(201
4)...
......
......
...
......
....1
3SM
AIL
BUSI
NES
S &
ENTR
EPR
ENEÛ
RIA
IC
oUN
oIL,
SM
AIL
BUSI
NES
S Po
LIcY
IND
EX20
14: R
ANKI
NG
TH
E Po
LIcY
MEA
SIIR
ESAN
D C
osTS
IMPA
oTIN
G S
MAL
L BU
SIN
ESS
AND
EN
TREP
REN
EUR
SHTP
(2
0 1
4) ..
......
......
......
......
.. 1
3
Stat
esid
e As
socs
., C
lass
Act
ion
Law
suíts
in S
tate
Cou
rts: A
Cas
e St
ud,y
ín
REv
. 103
(200
9)
Alab
ama
(199
8) (a
ttach
ed t
o St
atem
ent
of D
r. Jo
hn B
. Hen
dric
ks a
t Mâs
s To
rtsan
d C
lass
Act
ions
: Hea
rings
Bef
ore
the
Subc
omm
. on
Cou
rts a
nd In
telle
ctua
lPr
oper
ty o
f the
Hou
se C
omm
. on
the
10
Judi
ciar
y, 1
05th
Con
g. (
À4ar
. 5, 1
998)
)
.30
Susa
n P.
Kon
iak
& G
eorg
e M
.U
nd.e
r C
loak
of S
ettle
men
t,R
Ev. 1
051
(199
6)
t5,2
7
Coh
en,
82 V
A. L
.
I
INTR
oDU
cTI0
N A
ND
INTE
RES
T oF
AM
ICI C
unTe
¡
The
atní
ci c
uri,a
e ar
e St
ates
con
cern
ed th
at lo
wer
cour
t dec
isio
ns h
ave
upse
t the
bal
ance
bet
wee
npr
ovid
ing
inju
red
parti
es a
cces
s to
the
cour
ts a
nden
surin
g th
at b
usin
esse
s ar
e no
t fac
ed w
ith a
busi
ve,
no-h
arm
law
suits
.l By
elim
inat
ing
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent
of s
tand
ing,
thes
e de
cisi
ons
have
unle
ashe
d a
torre
nt o
f pot
entia
lly fi
rm-k
illing
cla
ssac
tions
for t
echn
ical
stâ
tuto
ry v
iola
tions
that
hav
eca
used
no
actu
al h
arm
to p
lain
tiffs
. Thi
s C
ourt
shou
ld re
affrr
m th
at a
ctua
l har
m is
nec
essa
ry to
esta
blis
h Ar
ticle
III s
tand
ing
and
rest
ore
a ba
lanc
eth
at re
spec
ts th
e in
tere
sts
of b
oth
cons
umer
s an
dbu
sine
sses
.Th
e ex
perie
nce
of l}
:.e a
rnic
i Sta
tes
dem
onst
rate
sth
e ne
ed fo
r bal
ance
in o
ur s
yste
m o
f civ
il lit
igat
ion.
In re
spon
se to
wid
espr
ead
abus
e of
the
clas
s ac
tion,
man
y of
t}:e
a,m
íci S
tate
s, w
orki
ng w
ith C
ongr
ess
and
the
cour
ts, h
ave
enac
ted
thor
ough
goin
g re
form
sof
cla
ss a
ctio
n lit
igat
ion
desi
gned
to e
limin
ate
abus
ew
hiÌe
mai
ntai
ning
a v
ehic
le to
redr
ess
wid
espr
ead
inju
ries.
The
low
er c
ourt'
s de
cisi
on u
nder
min
es th
est
andi
ng r
equi
rem
ents
of A
rticl
e III
and
thre
aten
s to
retu
rn u
s to
the
"bad
old
day
s" o
f cla
ss-a
ctio
n ab
use,
whe
re la
wye
r-driv
en a
ctio
ns w
ere
desi
gned
to
prod
uce
larg
e fe
es ra
ther
than
to m
ake
inju
red
parti
es w
hole
.By
aÌI
but e
limin
atin
g its
cor
e co
mpo
nent
-inju
ryin
fact
-the
low
er c
ourt'
s de
cisi
on s
trips
sta
ndin
g of
1 Th
e on
ici S
tate
s do
not
nee
d co
nsen
t of
the
parti
es to
frle
this
brie
f. Se
e Su
p. C
t. R
. 3?(
4).
2
its c
onst
itutio
nal r
ole
as th
e "e
ssen
tial a
ndun
chan
ging
par
t of
th
e ca
se-o
r-con
trove
rsy
requ
irem
ent o
f Arti
cle
fII."
Lujø
n u.
Def
ende
rs o
fW
ild.Ii
fe,5
04 U
.S. 5
55, 5
60 (1
992)
. Equ
atin
g in
jury
infa
ct w
ith te
chni
cal s
tatu
tory
vio
latio
ns,
nam
edpl
aint
iffs
can
driv
e cl
asse
s nu
mbe
ring
in t
hem
illion
s. T
hese
act
ions
ofb
en s
eek
billio
ns o
r eve
ntri
llions
of d
olla
rs in
sta
tuto
ry d
amag
e aw
ards
on
beha
lf of
put
ativ
e cl
ass
mem
bers
who
hav
e su
ffere
dno
act
ual h
arm
. So
perv
erse
are
the
ince
ntiv
escr
eate
d un
der t
his
stan
ding
reg
ime
that
clas
sm
embe
rs h
ave
begu
n to
forg
o ac
tual
dam
ages
alto
geth
er,
seek
ing
inst
ead
to s
inpl
ifu th
e ex
pans
ion
of th
e cl
ass
and,
con
sequ
ently
, th
e st
atut
ory
dam
age
awar
d. Req
uirin
g co
ncre
te in
jury
in fa
ct fo
r sta
tuto
ryda
mag
es re
stor
es n
eede
d ba
lanc
e. It
ens
ures
that
the
plai
ntiff
s se
ekin
g st
atut
ory
dam
ages
are
thos
e w
hoha
ve b
een
actu
ally
har
med
by
a de
fend
ant's
con
duct
and
have
a s
take
in th
e lit
igat
ion
beyo
nd th
e da
mag
eaw
ard
itsel
f. It
ensu
res
that
the
defe
ndan
ts in
suc
hIa
wsu
its a
re b
usin
esse
s w
hose
act
ions
hav
e ac
tual
lyha
rmed
con
sum
ers.
And
it e
nsur
es th
at e
nfor
cem
ent
is ta
rget
ed to
pra
ctic
es th
at h
ave
caus
ed a
ctua
lha
rm-a
s op
pose
d to
thos
e m
ost c
ondu
cive
to cl
ass
certi
ficat
ion.
The
Cou
rt sh
ould
reve
rse
the
deci
sion
of t
heIo
wer
cou
rt an
il re
affir
m th
at th
e st
andi
ng a
naly
sis
requ
ires
actu
al h
arm
to e
stab
lish
inju
ry in
fact
inst
atut
ory
dam
ages
litig
atio
n.
3
Su[{n
rAR
Y oF
AR
GTT
MEN
T
The
cons
eque
nces
of t
he C
ourt'
s de
cisi
on in
this
case
go
far b
eyon
d w
heth
er R
obin
s ca
n co
ntin
ue h
issu
it ag
ains
t Spo
keo.
The
Cou
rt ha
s th
e op
portu
nity
to re
stor
e ba
lanc
e to
â s
yste
m th
at h
as b
een
upse
t by
the
unw
illing
ness
of t
he lo
wer
cou
rts to
enf
orce
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent o
f sta
ndin
g in
stat
utor
yda
mag
es c
lass
act
ions
. Th
is re
ticen
ce h
as le
d to
aw
ave
of n
o-in
jury
, win
dfal
l cla
ss a
ctio
ns th
atun
derm
ine
the
goal
s of
sta
tuto
ry-d
amag
es l
aws.
By
rees
tabl
ishi
ng th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ct r
equi
rem
ent,
this
Cou
rt ca
n re
stor
e ba
lanc
e to
our
sys
tem
of l
itiga
tion.
I. Th
e St
ates
hav
e w
orke
d w
ith C
ongr
ess
and
the
judi
ciar
y to
lim
it cl
ass
actio
n ab
use
and
ensu
reba
lanc
e in
the
judi
cial
sys
tem
.A.
By
rest
orin
g in
jury
in fa
ct to
its
right
fui p
lace
,th
e C
ourt
can
avoi
d a
retu
rn to
the
Wild
Wes
t of
clas
s ac
tion
abus
e th
at s
tate
s, C
ongr
ess,
and
the
judi
ciar
y ha
ve tr
ied
to c
iviliz
e. T
he e
xper
ienc
e of
the
amic
i Sta
tes
dem
onst
rate
s th
at c
lass
act
ions
are
uniq
uely
l'ul
nera
ble
to a
buse
s th
at s
ubor
ilinat
e th
ein
tere
sts
of th
e cl
ass
mem
bers
to
the
inte
rest
s of
the
clas
s's c
ouns
el a
nd re
pres
enta
tive.
In th
e 19
90s,
clas
s ac
tions
wer
e ou
t of c
ontro
l. C
erta
in ju
dges
rout
inel
y ce
rtifie
d na
tionw
ide
clas
ses
with
out
scru
tiny
and
appr
oved
ineq
uita
ble
clas
s se
ttlem
ents
that
pro
vide
d lit
tle c
ompe
nsat
ion
for a
bsen
t cla
ssm
embe
rs.
B. M
any
stat
es re
cogn
ized
thes
e ab
uses
and
inst
itute
d si
gnifi
cant
cla
ss-a
ctio
n re
form
s, s
uch
ashe
ight
ened
cer
ti-fic
atio
n pr
oced
ures
and
inte
rlocu
tory
appe
al o
f cer
tific
atio
n or
ders
. The
Sta
te o
f Ala
bam
a,
4
the
lead
am
icus
her
e, w
as a
t the
van
guar
d of
bot
h of
thes
e tre
nds.
Ala
bam
a su
ffere
d fro
m it
s sh
are
ofcl
ass-
actio
n ab
uses
and
the
econ
omic
dam
age
they
caus
e, b
ut it
impl
emen
ted
refo
rms
afte
r tho
se a
buse
sca
me
to li
ght.
If th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ct re
quire
men
t is
wea
kene
d an
d ab
usiv
e st
atut
ory
clas
s ac
tions
are
allo
wed
to
proc
eed,
muc
h of
this
wor
k w
ill be
und
one.
II. B
y el
imin
atin
g th
e ne
ed fo
r act
ual h
arm
, the
low
er c
ourt'
s ap
proa
ch to
inju
ry in
fact
ups
ets
the
bala
nce
and
invi
tes
a ne
w \¡
¡ave
of a
busi
ve s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
cla
ss a
ctio
ns.
A. T
he c
lass
act
ion
and
stat
utor
y da
mag
es a
rebo
th im
porta
nt to
ols
that
ena
ble
an a
ggrie
ved
party
to v
indi
cate
inju
ries
that
mig
ht o
ther
wis
e go
unre
dres
sed.
Com
bine
d th
ey a
te p
artic
ular
lypo
wer
ful,
as th
ey a
llow
con
sum
ers
to p
ursu
esi
gnifi
cant
dam
ages
aga
inst
def
enda
nts
for
wid
espr
ead
abus
es th
at C
ongr
ess
has
soug
ht to
stam
p ou
t. Bu
t alth
ough
thes
e de
vice
s ca
n do
muc
hgo
od, u
nmoo
red
from
trad
ition
al p
roce
dura
lIim
itatio
ns o
n lit
igat
ion,
they
can
als
o ca
use
grea
tde
stru
ctio
n. B
y w
eake
ning
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent
of s
tanù
ing,
Iow
er c
ourts
hav
e al
low
edm
assi
ve c
lass
act
ions
see
king
firm
-killi
ng d
amag
es to
proc
eed
agai
nst d
efen
dant
s th
at h
ave
caus
ed n
oha
rm. D
oing
so
not o
nly
unde
rmin
es s
tand
ing
as a
gate
keep
er a
gain
st c
lass
-act
ion
abus
e; it
und
erm
ines
the
clas
s ce
rtific
atio
n pr
oces
s as
weI
I.B.
The
rule
ann
ounc
ed b
y th
e lo
wer
cou
rtco
llaps
es th
e st
andi
ng a
naly
sis
and
uncl
erm
ines
the
four
par
t tes
t of R
uIe
23(a
). Th
e th
ree
elem
ents
of
inju
ry in
fact
, cau
satio
n, a
nd re
dres
sabi
-lity
are
"the
irred
ucib
le c
onst
itutio
nål m
inim
um o
f sta
ndin
g."
5
Luja
n, 5
O4
U.S
. at 5
60. T
he lo
wer
cou
rt's
rule
,ho
wev
er,
furth
er re
duce
s th
e an
alys
is d
own
to o
nequ
estio
n-di
d th
e de
fend
ant a
llege
dly
fail
to c
onfo
rmits
beh
avio
r to
the
stat
ute?
Thi
s ap
proa
ch o
bvia
tes
the
need
for a
ny s
ubst
ântiv
e in
quiry
into
inju
ry in
fact
, cau
satio
n, a
nd re
dres
sabi
Lity
.Si
mila
rly, t
he R
uIe
23(a
) req
uire
men
ts o
fnu
mer
osity
, co
mm
onal
ity, t
ypic
ality
, and
ade
quat
ere
pres
enta
tion
are
a ne
cess
ary
chec
k on
cla
ss-a
ctio
nab
use.
In n
o-ha
rm c
lass
act
ions
, how
ever
, the
sere
quire
men
ts h
ave
no re
al fo
rce.
No-
harm
cla
sses
tend
to n
umbe
r in
the
milli
ons,
and
sin
ce th
ey s
eek
com
pens
atio
n fo
r mer
e te
chni
cal s
tatu
tory
vio
latio
ns,
com
mon
ality
and
typi
calit
y pr
esen
t no
bar t
o cl
ass
certi
frcat
ion.
In fa
ct, c
lass
mem
bers
mây
eve
n ag
ree
to fo
rgo
actu
al d
amag
es s
o as
to m
ake
the
clas
s as
hom
ogen
eous
as
poss
ible
. Th
e go
al o
f the
clas
sac
tion-
mak
ing
inju
red
parti
es w
hole
-bec
omes
subo
rdin
ate
to th
e go
al o
f cre
atin
g a
bigg
er a
nd n
ore
lucr
ativ
e cl
ass.
C. N
o-ha
rm c
lass
act
ions
rou
tinel
y se
ek s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
in th
e bi
llions
or e
ven
trillio
ns o
f dol
lars
for
clas
s m
embe
rs th
at s
uffe
r no
conc
rete
inju
ry.
Aìth
ough
a w
indf
all f
or c
lass
cou
nsel
, the
se m
assi
vesu
its a
re o
ften
pote
ntia
l firm
kille
rs w
'ith s
ubst
antia
iin
terro
rem
effe
ct. S
ince
cla
ss c
ertif
icat
ion
in th
ese
case
s is
a fo
rego
ne c
oncl
usio
n, d
efen
dant
s ar
e fa
ced
with
a "y
our m
oney
or y
our l
ife" c
hoic
e. T
hey
can
eith
er s
ettle
or b
et th
e fir
m o
n a
favo
rabl
e ou
tcom
e.III
. The
Cou
rt ca
n re
stor
e ne
eded
bal
ance
by
reaf
firm
ing
that
inju
ry in
fact
requ
ires
actu
al h
arm
.Th
e C
ourt
can
end
this
con
fusi
on a
nd s
tave
off
ane
\ry w
âve
of c
lass
-act
ion
abus
e by
sim
ply
6
âckn
owle
dgin
g th
at C
ongr
ess
pa6s
es s
tatu
tes
âgai
nst
the
back
drop
of
cons
titut
iona
l req
uire
men
ts,
incl
udin
g st
andi
ng. D
oing
so
rest
ores
inju
ry in
fact
toits
pro
per
plac
e an
d en
sure
s th
at s
tatu
tory
-dam
ages
sche
mes
bet
ter a
ccom
plis
h th
eir g
oals
. Def
enda
nts
wou
ld fa
ce p
artie
s th
ey h
ad h
arm
ed b
y th
eir c
ondu
ct.
Plai
ntiff
s w
ould
hav
e a
stak
e in
the
litig
atio
n be
yond
the
dam
age
awar
d its
elf,
dire
ctin
g lit
igat
ion
tow
ards
prac
tices
that
cau
se h
arm
to c
onsu
mer
s an
d ag
ains
tpa
rties
who
eng
age
in th
ose
prac
tices
. R
esto
ring
bala
nce
wou
ld th
us b
ette
r ac
com
plis
h th
e go
als
Con
gres
s se
t out
to a
chie
ve in
pas
sing
sta
tuto
ry-
dam
ages
law
s w
hile
avo
idin
g th
e da
nger
of
over
enfo
rcem
ent.
This
Cou
rt sh
ould
rev
erse
the
low
er c
ourt.
ARG
UM
ENT
Our
sys
tem
stri
kes
a ha
rd-fo
ught
bal
ance
betw
een
the
right
of t
he in
jure
d to
reco
ver d
amag
esan
d th
e rig
ht o
f def
enda
nts
to b
e fre
e fro
m a
busi
velit
igat
ion.
By
faiL
ing
to e
nfor
ce th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ctre
quire
men
t, lo
wer
cou
rts h
ave
upse
t tha
t bal
ance
,al
low
ing
win
dfal
l cla
ss a
ctio
ns to
con
tinue
aga
inst
defe
ndan
ts w
ho h
ave
harm
ed n
o on
e. B
y re
stor
ing
inju
ry in
fact
to it
s rig
htfu
l pla
ce in
the
stan
ding
anal
ysis
, thi
s C
ourt
can
rese
t tha
t bal
ance
whi
levi
ndic
atin
g th
e pu
rpos
e of
sta
tuto
ry-d
amag
es la
ws.
I. Th
e St
ates
hav
e a
stro
ng in
tere
st in
ensu
ring
a ba
lanc
ed le
gal s
yste
m.
In lln
e am
ici S
tate
s' ex
perie
nce,
cla
ss a
ctio
ns a
rean
impo
rtant
pro
cedu
raì d
evic
e fo
r ef
ficie
ntco
nsum
er li
tigat
ion,
but
als
o un
ique
ly v
ulne
rabl
e to
7
abus
e. T
hese
vul
nera
bilit
ies
are
driv
en in
larg
e pa
rtby
the
huge
dam
age
awar
ds w
aitin
g at
the
end
of a
succ
essf
ul li
tigat
ion,
lead
ing
to tw
o pr
oble
ms.
Firs
t,cl
âss
coun
sel h
as "a
pow
erfu
l frn
anci
al in
cent
ive
to[it
igat
e] th
e ca
se o
n te
rms
favo
rabl
e to
them
selv
es,
but n
ot n
eces
saril
y fa
vora
ble
to th
eir u
nkno
wn
clie
nts,
" an
d ce
rtain
ly n
ot fa
vora
ble
to th
e pu
blic
at
larg
e. D
ukes
u. W
aI-M
art,
Inc.
, 5O
9 F.
3d i
168,
119
9(9
th C
ir. 2
007)
(Kle
infie
ld, J
., di
ssen
ting)
, reu
'd, W
aI-
Mar
t Sto
res,
Inc.
u. D
uhes
, 131
S. C
t. 25
47 (2
07I).
Seco
ndly
, bec
ause
of t
he le
vera
ge o
f agg
rega
ted
clai
ms,
a c
ourt'
s pr
elim
inar
y de
cisi
on to
cer
tify
acl
ass
may
coe
rce
a de
fend
ant
to s
ettle
, esp
ecia
llyw
hen
the
only
alte
rnat
ive
is to
"bet
[] [th
e] c
ompa
nyon
â si
ngle
jury
ver
dict
." M
chey
nold
s u.
Men
illLy
nch,
Pie
rce,
Fen
ner &
Sm
ith, I
nc.,
672
F.3d
482
,49
1 (7
th C
fu. 2
012)
. With
out p
rope
r saf
egua
rds
topr
even
t the
cer
tific
atio
n of
abu
sive
cla
ss a
ctio
ns,
clas
s co
unse
l hav
e an
ince
ntiv
e to
brin
g bi
gger
and
bigg
er c
lass
es s
eeki
ng la
rger
and
larg
er d
amag
es,
with
def
enda
nts
all b
ut c
ompe
lled
to s
ettle
.
A.
The
atni
ci S
tate
s ha
ve b
orne
witn
ess
to th
e m
agni
tude
of a
buse
the
clas
s ac
tion
can
invi
te,
The
thre
at o
f cl
ass-
actio
n ab
use
is n
otsp
ecul
ativ
e. D
urin
g th
e 19
90s,
the
ømic
i Sta
tes
wer
ein
unda
ted
with
friv
olou
s cl
ass
actio
ns th
at c
ame
with
sig
nific
ant e
cono
nic
cost
. The
Iead
arn
icus
her
e,A-
laba
ma,
had
a fr
ont-r
ow s
eat t
o m
any
of th
e w
orst
of th
ese
abus
es. A
laba
ma
judg
es in
cer
tain
cou
ntie
sw
ere
know
n to
cer
tify
natio
nwid
e cl
ass
actio
ns w
ithIit
tle o
r no
anal
ysis
. Fro
m 1
995
to 1
997,
a to
tal o
f 91
puta
tive
clas
s ac
tions
wer
e fiì
eil in
six
A-la
bam
a
8
coun
ties.
Sta
tesi
de A
ssoc
s., C
lass
Act
ion
Løw
suíts
inSt
øte
Cou
rts: A
Cas
e St
udy
in A
laba
rna
(199
8)(a
ttach
ed to
Sta
tem
ent o
f Dr.
John
B. H
endr
icks
at
Mas
s To
rts a
nd C
lass
Act
ions
: Hea
rings
Bef
ore
the
Subc
omm
. on
Cou
rts a
nd In
telle
ctua
l Pr
oper
ty o
f the
Hou
se C
omm
. on
the
Juùi
ciar
y, 1
05th
Con
g. (i
\tlar
. 5,
1998
)).2
Judg
es c
ertif
ied
clas
ses
irr 4
3 of
thos
e ca
ses;
in a
t lea
st 3
8, th
e ce
rtific
atio
n w
as e
x pa
rte a
nden
tere
d on
or s
hortl
y af
ter t
he d
ay th
e co
mpl
aint
was
filed
. Id.
Law
yers
coi
ned
a co
lorfu
l ter
m fo
r the
sequ
ick,
e*
parte
cer
hfíc
atio
n or
ders
: the
"driv
e-by
''cl
ass
actio
n. S
ee, e
.9.,
Mitc
hell
u. H
& R
Blo
ck, I
nc.,
783
So. 2
d. 8
72, 8
18 (A
la. 2
000)
(Hoo
per,
C.J
.,di
ssen
ting)
.C
ompo
undi
ng th
is p
robl
em, m
any
judg
es w
ere
sim
ilarly
lax
in
revi
ewin
g pr
opos
ed cl
ass
settl
emen
ts. T
his
lack
of d
iligen
ce le
d to
col
lusi
onbe
twee
n na
med
pla
intif
fs a
nd d
efen
dant
s an
dun
fairn
ess
to a
bsen
t cla
ss m
embe
rs .
In H
offm
øn, e
taI
. u. B
ank
of B
osto
n, fo
r exa
mpÌ
e, a
hom
eow
ner
chal
leng
ed th
e Ba
nk o
f Bos
ton
s pr
âctic
e of
hol
ding
too
muc
h m
oney
in it
s m
ortg
age
escr
ow a
ccou
nts,
whi
ch p
reve
nted
the
hom
eow
ners
fro
m s
pend
ing
that
mon
ey u
ntil
they
had
pai
d of
f the
ir m
ortg
ages
. See
Kam
íIew
ícz
u. B
a,nh
of B
osto
n C
orp.
, 92
F.3d
506
(7th
Cir.
199
6) (
disc
ussi
ng H
offm
an, e
t aI.
u. B
ancB
osto
nM
ortg
. Cor
p., N
o. C
V-91
-188
0 (A
ìa. C
ir. C
I., J
an. 2
4,19
94)).
The
set
tlem
ent i
n th
at ca
se, a
ppro
ved
by a
nAl
abam
a ju
dge,
requ
ired
the
bank
to re
turn
the
over
âges
imm
edia
tely
, bu
t als
o aw
arde
d m
ore
than
$8.5
milI
ion
in a
ttorn
eys'f
ees
to b
e pa
id b
y cl
ass
o
mem
bers
out
of p
ocke
t. Ka
mile
wic
z, 9
2 F.
3d a
t 508
-09
. The
ups
hot w
as th
at m
any
abse
nt c
lass
mem
bers
paid
out
mor
e in
fees
than
they
rece
ived
in re
fund
s.Fo
r one
Mai
ne re
side
nt, t
he s
ettle
men
t res
ulte
d in
a$2
.19
cred
it an
d $9
1.33
deb
it fro
m h
is b
ank
acco
unt.
See
Køm
ilew
icz,
100
F.3
d at
L34
9 (E
aste
rbro
ok,
J.,
diss
entin
g); s
ee ø
lso,
e.9
., Ba
rty J
ù/.e
iet,
Mat
h of
aC
lass
-Act
ion
Suit:
Win
ning
' $2.
19 C
osts
.f91
.33,
N.Y
.Tr
ltos,
Nov
. 27,
199
5, a
t 41.
3 Si
mila
rly, a
Tex
asre
side
nt r
ecei
ved
no c
redi
t and
a $
144
debi
t. Se
eBe
nn u
. Ban
cBos
ton,
No.
3:9
6-C
V-09
74-J
, at 2
-4(N
.D-
Tex.
Oct
. 4, 1
996)
; Edd
ie C
urra
n, Y
ou W
in, Y
ouPø
y, M
our-o
RÐ
c. (A
la.),
Dec
. 29,
199
9, a
t 14,
auøí
Iabl
e at
799
9 IV
LNR
724
8175
; Su
san
P. K
onia
k&
Geo
rge
M. C
ohen
, Und
er C
loah
of S
ettle
men
t, 82
vA. L
. REv
. 105
1, 1
054-
68 (
1996
).
Alab
ama
was
far f
rom
alo
ne, p
artic
ular
ly in
the
area
of s
ettle
men
t abu
se. I
n llli
nois
, a c
lass
com
prom
ised
its
fals
e-ad
verti
sing
cla
ims
agai
nst
Pola
nd S
prin
g fo
r a s
ettle
men
t of d
isco
unte
d w
ater
and
char
itabl
e co
ntrib
utio
ns. S
ee E
dwar
d D
.M
urph
y, P
olan
d, S
prin
g Se
ttles
Pur
ity S
uit,
PoR
TI,A
ND
PR
ESS
HER
AID
, Nov
. 6, 2
003,
at 6
8,au
aíIa
ble
o,t 2
OO
3 W
LNR
134
7168
4 (d
iscu
ssin
gR
amse
y u.
Nes
tle W
øter
s N
. Atn
., In
c. d
./b/a
Pol
and,
Sprin
g W
ater
Co.
, No.
03
CH
K 81
7 (IÌ
L C
ir. C
t., N
ov.
5, 2
003)
). Th
e na
med
pla
intif
f rec
eive
d $1
2,00
0, a
ndth
e pl
aint
iffs'
Iaw
yers
rece
ived
$1.
35 m
illion
. Id.
Acl
ass
in T
exas
com
prom
ised
its
clai
m th
atBl
ockb
uste
r ch
arge
d ex
cess
ive
late
fees
for a
settl
emen
t of c
oupo
ns g
ivin
g pl
aint
iffs
$1 o
ff a
vicl
eo
2 Av
aila
b le
at h
ttp;//
com
mdo
cs.h
ouse
. go
v/co
nmitt
ees/
judi
ciar
y/hj
u599
21.0
00/h
ju59
92l_
Of.h
tm
(ast
vis
ited
July
7, 2
015)
.
a Au
øilø
ble
at h
l,T,p
://w
ww
.n¡ti
mes
.com
/l995
/11/
21lu
s/m
ath-
of-a
-cl
ass-
actio
n-su
it-w
inni
ng-2
.19-
cost
s-91
.33.
htm
Ì Q
ast v
isite
dJu
ly 7
,201
5).
10
rent
al; m
eanw
hile
, the
cla
ss a
ttorn
eys
rece
ived
$9.
25m
illion
in fe
es. S
ee B
lock
bust
er S
ettle
s La
te-fe
e Su
itw
ith C
ertif
icat
e Pl
az, H
oust
oN C
HR
oN.,
Jan.
13,
20O
2, a
uøíIa
ble
or 2
002
WLN
R 1
3576
864
(dis
cuss
ing
Scot
t u. B
lock
bust
er 1
¿c.,
No.
DI6
2-53
5, (
Jeffe
rson
Cnt
y., T
ex.,
2001
)). A
nd, i
n G
eorg
ia, a
cla
ssco
mpr
omis
ed it
s cl
aim
that
Coc
a-C
ola
impr
oper
lyad
ded
swee
tene
rs to
its
drin
ks fo
r a s
ettle
men
t of
50-
cent
cou
pons
; th
e cl
ass's
cou
nsel
rec
eive
d $1
.5m
illion
. Law
yers
Get
$1.
5 M
illíon
, Clie
nts
Get
50
Cen
ts O
ff, F
ULT
oN C
ouN
Ty D
ArLy
REp
., N
ov. 2
1,19
97. S
ee g
ener
olly
S. R
ep. N
o. 1
09-1
4, a
t 10-
20 (
Feb.
28, 2
OO
5) (c
iting
exa
mpi
es fr
om A
laba
ma,
Cal
iforn
ia,
Del
awar
e, F
lorid
a, Il
linoi
s, K
ansa
s, M
inne
sota
, New
York
, and
Tex
as).
B.
Man
y st
ates
rec
ogni
zed
the
prob
lem
and
, to
geth
er w
ithC
ongr
ess
and
the
judi
ciar
y,im
plem
ente
d re
form
s.
Hap
pily
, thr
ough
sus
tain
ed le
gisl
ativ
e an
dju
ùici
al e
ffort,
man
y st
ates
hav
e re
cogn
ized
the
inhe
rent
pro
blem
s w
ith c
lass
litig
atio
n an
d ha
veim
plem
ente
d im
porta
nt re
form
s to
miti
gate
them
.Th
ese
stat
e re
form
s ru
n th
e ga
mut
from
ven
ue r
ules
to c
ertif
icat
ion
proc
edur
es.
For e
xam
ple,
sta
tes
have
ado
pted
rigo
rous
proc
edur
es fo
r cla
ss c
ertif
icat
ion.
In 1
997,
the
Supr
eme
Cou
rt of
A-la
bam
a ad
opte
d th
e rig
orou
s"fe
dera
l app
roac
h" to
cer
tific
atio
n, E
x pø
rte A
rn.
Banh
ers
Life
Ass
ur. C
o. o
f F\a
.,715
So.
2d
186,
187
(Ala
. 199
7), a
nd h
eld
that
"[a]
cla
ss s
houl
d no
t be
certi
fied
with
out n
otic
e to
the
defe
ndan
t." E
x pa
rte
11
Citi
corp
Acc
epta
nce
Co.
, 1nc
.,715
So.
2d
199,
2O
5(A
la. 1
997)
. The
Ala
bam
a Le
gisl
atur
e la
ter
esta
blis
hed
deta
iled
proc
edur
es to
gov
ern
clas
sce
rtific
atio
n. S
ee A
t e. C
oDÐ
S 6
-5-6
4L.
The
Texa
sLe
gisl
atur
e lik
ewis
e en
acte
il co
mpr
ehen
sive
cla
ss-
actio
n re
form
, whi
ch s
et o
ut p
roce
dure
s th
at p
artie
sm
ust f
ollo
w d
urin
g cl
ass-
actio
n lit
igat
ion.
See
H.B
. 4,
78 L
eg. R
eg. S
ess.
(Tex
. 200
3) (c
odìfi
ed in
par
t at
TEx.
Cñ.
PR
¿,c.
& R
EM. C
oDE
$ 26
.001
et s
eq.);
see
also
Com
paq
Com
pute
r C
orp.
u. L
apra
y, 1
35 S
.W.3
d65
7, 6
71 (T
ex. 2
004)
(hol
ding
that
Tex
as s
tate
cou
rts"m
ust p
erfo
rm a
'rigo
rous
ana
lysi
s'bef
ore
rulin
g on
clas
s ce
rtific
atio
n to
det
erm
ine
whe
ther
all
prer
equi
site
s to
cer
tific
atio
n ha
ve b
een
met
").Si
mila
rly, F
lorid
a no
w re
quire
s th
at a
tria
l cou
rtm
ay "c
ertif
r a c
lass
act
ion
only
afte
r it d
eter
min
esth
roug
h rig
orou
s an
alys
is th
at th
e el
emen
ts o
f the
clas
s ac
tion
rule
hav
e be
en m
et."
Sem
inol
e C
nty.
u.
Tiuo
li O
rland
o As
socs
. Ltd
-,920
So.
2d
8I8,
823
-24
(FIa
. Dis
t. C
t. Ap
p. 2
006)
(rev
ersi
ng a
cla
ssce
rtific
atio
n or
der).
Oth
er s
tate
s ha
ve a
dopt
edsi
mila
r ref
orm
s. S
ee, e
.9.,
H.B
. 198
4 (L
a. 1
997)
(cod
fied
at L
A. C
oDE
Crv
. PR
oc. A
NN
. arts
. 591
-97)
(set
ting
out p
roce
dure
s th
at L
ouis
iana
cou
rts m
ust
follo
w w
hen
certi
fyin
g a
clas
s ac
tion)
; Bee
gal u
. Par
hW
. Ga.
IIery
,925
Ã.2
d 68
4, 6
97 (N
.J. 2
007)
(hol
ding
that
New
Jer
sey
cour
ts "s
houl
d un
derta
ke a
'rig
orou
san
alys
is' t
o de
term
ine
if th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f the
[cla
ss-c
ertif
rcat
ion]
rul
e ha
ve b
een
met
').R
efor
m h
as fo
cuse
d on
cla
ss c
ertif
icat
ion
for g
ood
reas
on-b
ecau
se o
f set
tlem
ent p
ress
ure,
the
clas
sce
rtific
atio
n de
cisi
on is
ofte
n t}:
'e o
nly
cont
este
dde
cisi
on th
at a
cou
rt m
akes
in a
cla
ss-a
ctio
n ca
se.
One
mec
hani
sm to
less
en th
e w
eigh
t atta
ched
to a
T2
certi
ficat
ion
(and
to p
rolo
ng th
e pe
riod
durin
g w
hich
the
clas
s re
pres
enta
tive
and
defe
ndan
t are
trul
yad
vers
e) is
to p
rovi
de fo
r im
med
iate
app
ella
te r
evie
wof
the
certi
ficat
ion
orde
r. M
any
stat
es h
ave
done
so.
,See
H.B
. 102
7 (C
olo.
200
3) (c
odifi
ed a
t CoL
o. R
Ev.
SrAr
. S 1
3-20
-901
); S.
B. 1
9 (G
a. 2
005)
(cod
ified
at G
a.C
oDE
ANN
. $ 9-
11-2
3(9)
); H
.B. 2
764
(I{an
. 200
4)(c
odifi
ed a
t KeN
. SrA
r. AN
N. $
60-
223(Ð
); H
.B. 1
211
(A{o
. 200
a) (c
odifi
ed a
t Mo.
REV
. SrA
r. S
512.
020(
3));
H.B
. 394
(Ohi
o 19
98)
(cod
ified
at O
HIo
REv
. CoD
EAN
I\L $
250
5.02
(B)(S
)); H
.B. 2
008/
S.8.
152
2 (T
enn.
2011
) (co
difie
d at
TEN
N. C
oDE
ANN
. $ 2
7-1-
125)
; H.B
.4
(Tex
. 200
3) (c
odifi
ed â
t TEx
. CIv
. PR
AC. &
REM
.C
oDE
S 51
.014
(âX3
)).St
ates
did
not
act
alo
ne. C
ongr
ess
also
got
invo
lved
, pas
sing
the
Cla
ss A
ctio
n Fa
irnes
s Ac
t in
2005
. Arrd
a n
umbe
r of
dec
isio
ns fr
om th
is C
ourt
also
help
ed to
rest
rain
som
e of
the
wor
st c
lass
-act
ion
abus
es.
See,
e.9
., C
ornc
ast
Cor
p. u
. Beh
rend
. L33
S.
Ct.7
426
(201
3);
Stan
dard
, Fire
Ins.
Co.
u. K
now
les,
133
S. C
t. 13
45 (2
013)
; Wal
-Mar
t St
ores
, Inc
. u.
Duh
es, I
}L S
. Ct.
2547
(2O
I7);
Dur
a Ph
arrn
., In
c. u
.Br
oud.
o, 5
44 U
.S. 3
36 (2
005)
.
II,
Low
er c
ourt
deci
sion
s w
eake
ning
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent h
ave
upse
t the
bala
nce
of o
ur ju
dici
al s
yste
rn.
The
resu
lt of
sta
te a
nd fe
dera
l ref
orm
s is
that
clas
s-ac
tion
abus
es, a
lthou
gh n
ot e
limin
ated
, hav
ebe
en le
ssen
ed in
man
y st
ates
, to
the
bene
fit o
f the
irci
tizen
s. T
he le
ad a
mic
us is
a p
rime
exam
ple.
Than
ks to
a c
ombi
natio
n of
legi
slat
ion
and
judi
cial
deci
sion
s, t
he A
mer
ican
Tor
t Ref
orm
Ass
ocia
tion
no
Iong
er li
sts
any
loca
lity
in A
.Iaba
ma
as a
"jud
icia
lhe
lihol
e." S
ee A
iu. T
oRT
RE¡
'oR
M A
ss'N
, 201
4120
15JU
DIo
IAT
HEL
LHoL
ES 7
-43
(2oL
5). A
¡d A
-laba
ma
has
cons
iste
ntly
topp
ed lis
ts o
f sta
tes
with
the
mos
tfa
vora
ble
busi
ness
clim
ates
. See
, e.9
,, SI
TESE
LÐC
TIoN
, To
P TE
N B
USI
NES
S C
LIM
ATES
(201
4);
SMAI
L Bu
srN
Ess
& EN
TREp
REN
EUR
SHIP
Cou
¡rcr¡,
,SM
AIL
BUSI
NES
S Po
LIcY
IND
EX 2
014:
RAN
KNG
TH
EPo
LIcY
MEA
SUR
ES A
ND
CoS
TS IM
PAC
TIN
G S
MÀL
LBU
SNES
S AN
D E
NTR
EPR
ENEI
JRSH
IP 2
(201
4) Q
istin
gAl
abam
a as
7 o
f 50)
.
But t
he c
aval
ier
non-
appl
icat
ion
of th
e st
andi
ngdo
ctrin
e to
Rul
e 23
cla
ss â
ctio
ns r
âise
s th
e sa
me
conc
erns
abo
ut d
ue p
roce
ss a
nd fa
irnes
s th
at th
eSt
ates
and
Con
gres
s ha
ve w
orke
d so
har
d to
redr
ess.
In c
ombi
natio
n, s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
and
no-
harm
Iaw
suits
ups
et th
e ba
lanc
e irr
our
litig
atio
n sy
stem
and
thre
aten
to re
turn
us
to th
e 'b
ad o
ld d
ays"
of
abus
ive
clas
s lit
igat
ion.
A.
Our
Con
stitu
tion
and
judi
cial
syst
em c
reat
e a
bala
nce
betw
een
secu
ring
the
right
of t
he in
jure
d to
rece
ive
rest
itutio
n an
d pr
otec
ting
defe
ndan
ts f
rom
abu
sive
litig
atio
n.Fu
ndam
enta
l fai
rnes
s re
quire
s th
at a
bal
ance
be
stru
ck b
etw
een
the
right
s of
pla
intif
fs a
ndde
fend
ants
. O
n th
e on
e ha
nd, o
ur s
yste
m g
ener
ally
allo
ws
anyo
ne w
ho is
har
med
to s
ue to
reco
ver
for
thei
r dam
ages
. On
the
othe
r, ce
rtain
pro
cedu
ral
safe
guar
ds-s
ome
prud
entia
l, ot
hers
con
stitu
tiona
l-ex
ist t
o pr
otec
t def
enda
nts
from
unf
air l
itiga
tion.
For
inst
ance
, in
case
s in
volv
ing
puni
tive
dam
ages
, th
is
I4C
ourt
has
poin
ted
to "[
e]le
men
tary
not
ions
of
fairn
ess"
in
inva
lidat
ing
awar
ds w
holly
disp
ropo
rtion
ate
to th
e un
derly
ing
offe
nse.
BM
W o
fN
. Am
., In
c. u
. Gor
e, 5
17 U
.S. 5
59, 5
74-7
6 (L
gg6)
.Th
is C
ourt
has
spok
en o
f the
nee
d to
,,st
rike
aba
lanc
e" b
etw
een
copy
'righ
t hol
ders
and
thos
eac
cuse
d of
infri
ngin
g th
at c
opyr
ight
. So
ny C
orp.
of
Am. u
. Uni
uers
al C
ity S
tudi
os, l
nc.,
464I
J.5.
41,
7, 4
42(1
984)
. And
this
Cou
rt ha
s ex
amin
ed e
fforts
by
Con
gres
s ín
qui
tam
act
ions
to b
alan
ce th
ego
vern
men
t's in
tere
st in
'?oo
t[ing
] ou
t fra
ud' a
gain
stth
e th
reat
of "
stifl
ing
para
sitic
law
suits
.,, G
raha
mC
nty.
Soi
l & W
ater
Con
seru
atio
n D
ist.
u. [J
.5. e
x re
l.W
ilson
, 559
U.S
. 2S0
, 294
-95
(2O
I0).
The
Con
stitu
tion
itsel
f hel
ps to
mai
ntai
n th
isba
lanc
e by
lim
iting
the
juris
dict
ion
of fe
dera
l cou
rtsto
"cas
es"
and
"con
trove
rsie
s.,'
U.S
. CoN
sr. a
rt. II
I,$
2, c
l. 1.
"[T]
he c
ore
com
pone
nt o
f sta
ndin
g is
an
esse
ntia
l and
unc
hang
ing
part
of th
e ca
se-o
r-co
ntro
vers
y re
quire
men
t of
Arti
cle
III."
Luja
n, á
04U
.S. a
t 560
. Tha
t cor
e co
mpo
nent
is it
self
mad
e up
of
thre
e el
emen
ts-in
jury
in f
act,
caus
atio
n, ã
ndre
dres
sabi
lity-
whi
ch a
re
,,the
irred
ucib
leco
nstit
utio
nal m
inim
um o
f sta
ndin
g.,,
Id,.
at 5
6O-6
I.Th
ese
requ
irem
ents
exi
st fo
r a re
ason
. The
yen
sure
that
pla
intif
fs a
re th
ose
who
hav
e th
emse
lves
been
inju
red
and
have
"a p
erso
nal s
take
in th
eou
tcom
e of
the
cont
rove
rsy
as to
ass
ure
that
con
cret
ead
vers
enes
s w
hich
sha
rpen
s th
e pr
esen
tatio
n of
issu
es."
Phillí
ps P
etro
leum
Co.
u. S
hutts
, 472
IJ.S
.79
7, 8
O4
(198
5). T
hey
prev
ent b
ount
y hu
ntin
glit
igat
ors
from
brin
ging
sui
ts w
here
thei
r onl
yco
ncre
te in
tere
st is
the
dam
age
awar
d its
elf.
Verm
ont
Agen
cy o
f Nat
ural
Res
. u. (
J.5,
ex
rel.
15
Steu
ens,
529
U.S
. 765
, 773
(200
0) ("
tAln
inte
rest
tha
is m
erel
y a
'byp
rodu
ct' o
f the
sui
t its
elf c
anno
t giv
,ris
e to
a co
gniz
able
inju
ry in
fact
for A
¡ticl
e II
stan
ding
pur
pose
s.").
And
they
ens
ure
that
a p
arty
ino
t sub
ject
to s
uit u
nles
s it
has
caus
ed h
arm
.
B.
The
stat
utor
y-da
mag
es c
lass
act
ior
and
the
effe
ctiv
e el
imin
atio
n of
thr
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent h
avt
upse
t the
bal
ance
.
The
com
bina
tion
of th
e cl
ass
actio
n an
d st
atut
or.'
dam
ages
, with
out
a ro
bust
inju
ry-in
-fac
requ
irem
ent t
o co
nstra
in th
em, m
akes
abu
srin
evita
ble.
Sta
tuto
ry d
amag
es a
nd th
e cl
ass
actio
rar
e bo
th p
ower
fuI t
ools
that
ena
ble
an a
ggrie
ver
party
to v
indi
cate
inju
ries
that
mig
ht o
ther
wis
e gr
unre
dres
sed.
But
toge
ther
, the
y cr
eate
"a p
erfe
cst
orm
in w
hich
two
inde
pend
ent
prov
isio
ns c
ombi
n<to
cre
ate
com
mer
cial
wre
ckag
e fa
r gre
ater
thar
eith
er c
ould
alo
ne."
Stillm
och
u. W
eis
Mar
hets
, Inc
.38
5 F.
App
'x 26
7, 2
76 (4
th C
ir. 2
010)
@ilk
inso
n, J
.co
ncur
ring)
.C
lass
act
ions
and
sta
tuto
ry d
amag
es s
ervt
esse
ntia
lly th
e sa
me
func
tion.
The
y en
cour
age
'litig
atio
n by
offs
ettin
g di
sinc
entiv
es to
sui
t whe
reth
e al
lege
d w
rong
doin
g in
volv
es n
omin
al fi
nanc
ia.
harm
." Sh
eila
B.
Sche
uerm
an, D
ue p
roce
s¿Fo
rgot
ten:
TÌt
e Pr
oble
m o
f Sta
tuto
ry D
amag
es a
nr)
Cla
ss A
ctio
ns,
74 M
:o. L
. REV
. 108
, 111
(200
9). I
not
her w
ords
, the
y se
ek to
mak
e lit
igat
ion
both
mor
em
arke
tabl
e an
d m
ore
attra
ctiv
e to
pla
intif
fs,
atto
rney
s.
1b
Cla
ss a
ctio
ns, b
y th
eir n
atur
e, e
ndan
ger
the
judi
cial
pro
cess
by
crea
ting
imm
ense
pre
ssur
e to
settl
e. S
ee, e
.g.,
AT&T
Mob
ílity
LLC
u. C
once
pcío
n,13
1 S.
Ct.
7740
, 175
2 (2
011)
('Bu
t whe
n da
mag
esal
lege
dly
owed
to te
ns o
f tho
usan
ds o
f pot
entia
lcl
aim
ants
are
agg
rega
ted
and
deci
ded
at o
nce,
the
risk
of a
n er
ror w
iII o
ften
beco
me
unac
cept
able
.Fa
ced
with
eve
n a
smal
l cha
nce
of a
dev
asta
ting
loss
,de
fend
ants
wi-l
l be
pres
sure
d in
to s
ettli
ngqu
estio
nabl
e cl
aim
s.");
Coo
pers
& L
ybra
nd, u
.Li
uesa
y,43
7 U
.S. 4
63, 4
76 (1
978)
("C
ertif
icat
ion
of a
Iarg
e cl
ass
may
so
incr
ease
the
defe
ndan
t's p
oten
tial
dam
ages
liabi
lity
and
litig
atio
n co
sts
that
he
may
find
it ec
onom
ical
ly p
rude
nt to
set
tle a
nd to
aba
ndon
a m
erito
rious
def
ense
."). A
¡d m
embe
rs o
f thi
s C
ourt
have
reco
gniz
ed th
at w
hen
the
clas
s ac
tion
and
stat
utor
y da
mag
es m
eet,
that
dan
ger
is m
agni
fied.
aW
here
cla
ss m
embe
rs h
ave
suffe
red
actu
al lo
ss,
such
mas
sive
cla
ss a
ctio
ns m
ight
be
the
nece
ssar
y-an
d ev
en d
esira
ble-
cons
eque
nce
of le
gisl
atio
nde
sign
ed to
mak
e th
e ag
grie
ved
who
le. B
ut if
act
ual
ha¡m
is n
ot re
quire
d to
brin
g su
ch a
n ac
tion,
then
the
tradi
tiona
l gat
ekee
pers
of s
tand
ing
and
clas
sce
rtific
atio
n fa
i-l, a
nd p
artie
s w
ho h
ave
not h
urt
a Se
e Sh
ødy
Gro
ue O
rthop
edíc
Ass
ocs-
, P.
A. u
. Alls
tøte
Ins.
Co.
,55
9 U
.S.3
93, 4
45 n
.3 (
2010
) (G
insb
urg,
J.,
diss
entin
g) (
,Ti¡h
enre
pres
enta
tive
plai
ntiff
s se
ek s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
, pïe
ssur
e to
settl
e m
ay b
e he
ight
ened
bec
ause
a c
lass
act
ion
pose
s th
e ris
kof
mas
sive
liab
ility
unm
oore
d to
act
ual i
njur
y.");
Tya
ns (
Jnio
nLL
C v
. Fed
,era
l Tfø
dn C
omm
h,53
6 U
.S. 9
15 (2
002)
({em
edy,
J., d
isse
ntin
g fro
m d
enia
l of c
ert.)
(not
ed th
at th
e pe
titio
ner
face
d a
cÌas
s ac
tion
of 1
90 m
illion
indi
vidu
als
seek
ing
stat
utor
yda
mag
es "
appr
oach
ing
9190
bi.J
-lion
," "q
ushi
ng J
iabi
lity',
that
held
con
sequ
ence
s fo
¡ 'b
oth
the
natio
nal e
cono
my
and
petit
ione
r's t
hous
ands
of e
mpl
oyee
s.").
17
anyo
ne fa
ce th
e pr
ospe
ct o
f dev
asta
ting-
and
poss
ibly
firm
-kiJ
ling-
win
dfal
l jud
gmen
ts.
C.
Wea
keni
ng th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ctre
quire
men
t col
laps
es th
e st
andi
ngan
alys
is â
nd th
e te
st fo
r cl
ass-
actio
n ce
rtific
atio
n,If
a m
ere
stat
utor
y vi
olat
ion
can
be a
n in
jury
infa
ct, s
tand
ing'
s tra
ditio
nal r
ole
as a
gat
ekee
per
toIit
igat
ion
falls
aw
ay, a
nd m
eani
ngfu
l cla
ss-a
ctio
nce
rtific
atio
n an
alys
is g
oes
with
it.
Des
pite
this
Cou
rt's
repe
ated
ass
ertio
n th
at in
jury
in fa
ct,
caus
atio
n, a
nd re
dres
sabi
lity
are
"the
irred
ucib
leco
nstit
utio
nal m
inim
um o
f sta
ndin
g,"
Lujø
n, 5
O4
U.S
. at 5
60, t
he lo
wer
cou
rts h
ave
furth
er re
duce
dth
e te
st w
hen
dete
rmin
ing
stan
ding
in st
atut
ory-
dam
ages
litig
atio
n. A
s th
e co
urt b
elow
adm
itted
inits
dec
isio
n, "
[w]h
ere
stat
utor
y rig
hts
are
asse
rteil,
how
ever
, our
cas
es h
ave
desc
ribed
the
stan
ding
inqu
iry a
s bo
iling
dow
n to
ess
entia
lly th
e in
jury
-in-
fact
pro
ng."
Rob
ins
u. S
pohe
o, In
c., 7
42 F
.3d
4O9,
4L4
(9th
Cir.
201
4) (i
nter
nal c
itatio
ns a
nd q
uotâ
tion
mar
ks o
mitt
e¿I)
cert.
grø
nted
., 13
5 S.
Ct.
1892
(201
5).
And
yet t
he lo
wer
cou
rt's
rule
wou
ld a
ctua
lly re
duce
the
stan
ding
ana
lysi
s ev
en fu
rther
to o
ne q
uest
ion-
ùid
the
defe
ndan
t al
lege
dly
fail
to co
nfor
m it
sbe
havi
or to
the
stat
ute?
If t
he a
nsw
er to
that
ques
tion
is y
es, t
he s
tand
ing
inqu
iry w
ould
esse
ntia
lly e
nd.
Wea
keni
ng th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ct re
qui.r
emen
t doe
sm
ore
than
und
erm
ine
Artic
le II
I sta
ndin
g; it
als
oco
llaps
es th
e cl
ass-
actio
n ce
rtifrc
atio
n an
alys
is. T
his
Cou
rt ha
s de
scrib
ed th
e cl
ass
actio
n as
an
18
exce
ptio
nal l
egal
dev
ice,
one
that
mus
t mee
tex
cept
iona
l sta
ndar
ds to
mov
e fo
rwar
d. W
al-M
ørt,
131
S. C
t- at
255
O-5
I. Th
ose
stan
dard
s of
num
eros
ity,
com
mon
ality
, ty
pica
lity,
and
ade
quat
ere
pres
enta
tion,
set
forth
in R
uIè
23, m
ust b
e"a
ffirm
ativ
ely
dem
onst
rate
[d]"
by th
e pa
rty s
eeki
ngcl
ass
certi
-fica
tion.
Id..
at 2
551.
The
se s
tand
ards
are
indi
spen
sibl
e, t
he a
naly
sis
of w
heth
er th
ey a
re m
et,
rigor
ous.
Id.
But u
nder
the
prec
eden
t set
by
the
low
er c
ourt,
the
Rul
e 23
sta
ndar
ds a
re a
ll bu
t dis
pens
ed w
ith a
ndth
e an
alys
is o
f whe
ther
or n
ot th
ey a
re m
et re
nder
edpe
rfunc
tory
. Cla
sses
see
king
stâ
tuto
ry d
amag
es te
ndto
num
ber i
n th
e hu
ndre
ds o
f tho
usan
ds,
if no
t the
milli
ons.
Sin
ce th
ese
actio
ns a
llege
a b
are
tech
nica
lvi
olat
ion
of th
e st
atut
e, is
sues
of c
omm
onal
ity a
ndt¡l
pica
lity
are
swep
t aw
ay. I
n fa
ct, n
amed
pla
intif
fsm
ay s
impl
y w
aive
cla
ims
of a
ctua
l dam
ages
in o
rder
to a
void
rais
ing
any
ques
tion
abou
t com
mon
ality
or
t¡aic
ality
. See
, e.9
., Sa
feco
Ins.
Co.
of A
m. u
. Bur
r,55
1 U
.S. a
7, 5
a (2
OO
7); M
unøy
u. G
MAC
Mor
tg.
Cor
p., 4
34 F
.3d
948,
953
(7th
Cir.
200
6) ('
IJnl
ess
adi
stric
t cou
rt fin
ds th
at p
erso
nal i
njur
ies
are
larg
e in
rela
tion
to s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
, a
repr
esen
tativ
epl
aìnt
iff m
ust b
e al
low
ed to
fore
go c
laim
s fo
rco
mpe
nsat
ory
dam
ages
in o
rder
to a
chie
ve c
lass
certi
ficat
ion.
"). T
his
situ
atio
n st
ands
in d
irect
cont
rast
to tr
aditi
onal
cla
ss-c
ertif
icat
ion
anal
ysis
,w
here
the
plai
ntiff
can
not p
reva
iì by
show
ing
"mer
ely
that
they
hav
e al
l suf
fere
d a
viol
atio
n of
the
sam
e pr
ovis
ion
of la
w."
WaI
-Mar
l, 13
1 S.
Ct.
at 2
55L.
Of c
ours
e, o
nce
the
clas
s is
cer
tifie
d, th
e ca
se is
esse
ntia
lly o
ver,
with
set
tlem
ent
follo
wilg
qui
ckly
.Th
us, t
he c
lass
act
ion
is tu
rned
on
its h
ead.
The
19
mor
e in
sign
ficân
t the
act
ual d
amag
es, t
he m
ore
Iikel
y a
win
dfal
l cla
ss a
ctio
n w
ilÌ s
urvi
ve th
ece
rtific
atio
n pr
oces
s an
d fo
rce
a pr
ofita
ble
settl
emen
t.Ef
forts
by
the
dist
rict c
ourts
to m
anuf
actu
re s
ome
sort
of re
stra
int o
n no
-har
m c
lass
act
ions
hav
e fa
iled.
Face
tl w
ith a
n ex
plos
ion
of n
ew li
tigat
ion,
dis
trict
judg
es h
ave
been
figh
ting
â re
ar-g
uard
act
ion
agai
nst w
incl
fall
clas
s ac
tions
, ref
usin
g to
certi
fyth
em u
nder
the
"sup
erio
rity''
ana
lysi
s. S
ee g
ener
ally
Hoþ
S. H
osfo
rd, A
uoid
ing
Anni
h,ila
tion:
Wy
Tria
lJu
d,ge
s Sh
ould
. Ref
use
to C
ertif
y A
FAC
TA C
lass
Actio
n fo
r Sta
tuto
ry D
ømøg
es W
here
the
Rec
ouer
yW
ould
, Lih
ely
Leau
e th
,e D
efen
d'øn
t Fac
ing
Imm
inen
tIn
solu
ency
, 81
MIs
s. L
.J. 7
941
(201
2). U
nder
RuI
e23
(bX3
), a
party
see
king
cla
ss c
ertif
icat
ion
mus
tsh
ow th
at a
cla
ss a
ctio
n is
"sup
erio
r to
othe
rav
aila
ble
met
hods
for t
he fa
irfl a
nd e
ffrci
entfl
adju
dica
t[ion
] of t
he c
ontro
vers
y."
FED
. R. C
tv. P
.23
(bX3
). So
me
dist
rict c
ourts
hav
e he
ld th
at b
ecau
seda
mag
es s
ough
t are
so
out o
f pro
porti
on t
o th
e ac
tual
harm
suf
fere
d, th
e cl
ass
actio
n is
not
sup
erio
r to
anin
divi
dual
act
ion
and
certi
ficat
ion
is in
appr
opria
te.
This
app
roac
h, h
owev
er, h
as a
n un
deni
able
flaw
-it la
cks
supp
ort i
n R
ule
23. T
he S
even
thC
ircui
t ove
rtu¡n
ed, o
n ab
use
of d
iscr
etio
n gr
ound
s, a
dist
rict c
ourt'
s re
fusa
l to c
ertif
y a
clas
s ac
tion
brou
ght b
y pr
ofes
sion
al p
lain
tiffs
with
mor
e th
anfif
ty n
o-ha
rm c
lass
act
ions
und
er th
eir b
elt.
Judg
eEa
ster
broo
k, w
ritin
g fo
r th
e Se
vent
h C
ircui
t,re
ject
ed w
hat h
e vi
ewed
as
an a
ttem
pt b
y th
e di
stric
tju
dge
to "
curta
il th
e ag
greg
ate
dam
ages
for
viol
atio
ns h
e de
emed
triv
ial,"
not
ing
that
sta
tute
s"m
ust b
e en
forc
ecl r
athe
r tha
n su
bver
ted.
" M
urra
y,
20
434
F.3d
at 9
53-5
4. F
ollo
win
g th
e Se
vent
h C
ircui
t'sÌe
ad, t
he N
inth
Circ
uit í
n Ba
tem
øn u
. Am
eric
anM
ultí-
Cin
ema,
I¿c.
foun
d a
dist
rict c
ourt
judg
eab
used
his
dis
cret
ion
in re
fusi
ng to
cer
tify,
on
supe
riorit
y gr
ound
s, a
cla
ss s
eeki
ng $
290
milli
on fo
rte
chni
cal v
iola
tions
of t
he F
air a
nd A
ccur
ate
Cre
dit
Tran
sact
ions
Act
(FAC
TA).
623
F.3d
708
, 712
-13
(gth
Cir.
201
0). B
oth
cour
ts c
oncl
uded
that
any
exc
essi
veaw
ard
coul
d be
redu
ced
afte
r tria
l, a
smal
l com
fort
tode
fend
ants
pre
ssur
ed t
o se
ttle
afte
r cer
tific
atio
n.
IlL
The
Cou
rt ca
n re
stor
e ba
lanc
e by
reite
ratin
g th
at in
jury
in fa
ct re
quire
sac
tual
har
m.
Wha
t dis
trict
judg
es c
anno
t acc
ompl
ish
thro
ugh
ad h
oc ju
stifi
catio
ns, t
his
Cou
rt ca
n do
sin
ply
byre
itera
ting
wha
t it
has
said
aga
in a
nd a
gain
-st
andi
ng re
quire
s a
conc
rete
inju
ry. N
o ne
w ru
les
orte
sts
are
neei
led.
The
Con
stitu
tion'
s Ar
ticle
III c
ase
or c
ontro
vers
y re
quire
men
t pro
vide
s th
e an
swer
. By
reaf
firm
ing
this
con
stitu
tiona
l prin
cþIe
, the
Cou
rtca
n re
stor
e ba
lanc
e to
the
syst
em, e
nsur
ing
acce
ss to
the
cour
ts fo
r tho
se w
ho h
ave
been
har
med
whi
lepr
otec
ting
the
ilue
proc
ess
right
s of
ilefe
ndan
tsag
ains
t abu
sive
litig
atio
n.At
the
sam
e tim
e, th
e C
ourt
can
help
to e
nsur
eth
at s
tatu
tory
dam
ages
acc
ompl
ish
thei
r obj
ectiv
es.
By re
quiri
ng a
ctua
l har
m, t
he C
ourt
will
enco
urag
eac
tion
by p
lain
tiffs
who
hav
e a
stak
e in
the
litig
atio
nbe
yond
the
dam
age
awar
d its
elf.
The
pow
erfu
l too
lsC
ongr
ess
incl
uded
in st
atut
ory-
dam
ages
leg
isla
tion
will
be d
irect
ed a
t har
mfu
l pra
ctic
es a
s op
pose
d to
mer
e te
chni
cal v
iola
tions
.
27
A.
A pr
oper
app
licat
ion
of th
e in
jury
-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent
will
elim
inat
eun
fair
win
dfal
l cla
ss a
ctio
ns.
An a
ctua
l inju
ry is
fou
ndat
iona
l to
the
cons
titut
iona
l sta
ndin
g in
quiry
. In
orde
r to
sue,
âpl
aint
iff m
ust h
ave
been
har
mec
l by
a de
fend
ant i
n a
way
that
is re
rlres
sibl
e in
cou
rt. T
he p
rinci
ple
of "n
oha
rm, n
o to
rt'is
axi
omat
ic in
the
law
; no
mat
ter h
owre
ckle
ss th
e dr
iver
, no
mat
ter h
ow m
any
law
s he
brea
ks, w
ithou
t har
m th
ere
is n
o ca
use
of a
ctio
n.Bu
t in
stat
utor
y-da
mag
es c
ases
, Iow
er c
ourts
have
dra
mat
ical
ly d
epar
ted
from
thes
e pr
inci
ples
base
d on
a m
isin
terp
reta
tion
of t
his
Cou
rt's
prec
eden
t.1.
Low
er c
ourts
hav
e w
hittl
ed a
way
the
inju
ry-in
-fa
ct re
quire
men
t by
rely
ing
exte
nsiv
ely
upon
tlic
ta in
a lin
e of
cas
es-S
ierrø
CIu
b u.
Mor
ton,
405
lJ.S
. 727
(1,9
72),
Lind
,a R
.S. u
. Ric
hard
. D
., 4l
O U
.S. 6
14(1
973)
, and
Wør
th u
. Sel
d.in
, 422
U.S
. 490
(197
5).
Wør
th }:
.as
been
par
ticul
arþ
infL
uent
ial.
Ther
e,qu
otin
g fro
m a
foot
note
in L
índ,
ø -R
.S.,
the
Cou
rtex
plai
ned
that
"[tlh
e ac
tuâl
or t
hrea
tene
d in
jury
requ
ired
by A
rt. II
I may
exi
st s
olel
y by
virt
ue o
{'st
atut
es c
reat
ing
lega
1 rig
hts,
the
inva
sion
of w
hicb
crea
tes
stan
ding
;" 42
2U.5
.490
, 500
(197
5).
This
sta
tem
ent c
anno
t be
read
to e
limin
ate
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent.
It i¡s
tead
sup
ports
th€
inno
cuou
s pr
opos
ition
that
Con
gres
s ca
n cr
eâte
ne\
ÃIe
gal r
ight
s an
d ne
w c
ause
s of
act
ion;
Con
gres
s "h
arth
e po
wer
to d
efin
e in
jurie
s an
d ar
ticul
ate
chai
ns o
caus
atio
n th
at w
i-ll g
ive
rise
to a
cas
e or
con
trove
rsJ
whe
re n
one
exis
ted
befo
re."
Luja
n,50
4 U
.S. a
t 58(
22
@en
nedy
, J.,
conc
urrin
g) (
citín
g W
ørth
). Th
at th
eC
ourt
did
not i
nten
d to
laun
ch a
radi
cal d
epar
ture
from
the
inju
ry-in
-fact
req
uire
men
t is
sup
porte
d by
the
fact
that
the
Cou
rt 'h
as s
eldo
m in
voke
d its
forn
ulat
ion
[of a
ctua
l or t
hrea
tene
d in
jury
]" se
t for
thin
t]ne
War
th li
ne o
f cas
es. J
ohn
S. H
addo
ck,
Artic
ulat
ing
A "R
atio
nal C
onne
ctio
n" R
equí
rem
ent
inAr
tícle
III S
tand
ing,
66
SrAN
. L. R
Ev. 1
425,
142
7(2
Ot4
).
Low
er c
ourts
, ho
wev
er, h
ave
show
n no
retic
ence
in a
ppþi
ng W
arth
bro
aðJy
, pa
rticu
larly
whe
nst
atut
ory
dam
ages
are
invo
lved
. See
id,.
("In
cont
rast
,ci
rcui
t cou
rts re
gula
rly r
ecite
this
lang
uage
to fi
ndAr
ticle
III
stan
ding
on
the
basi
s of
a st
atut
ory
viol
atio
n.");
Ha.
mm
er u
. San
n's
8., I
nc.,
754
F.gd
492
,49
8 (8
th C
ír. 2
0L4)
cer
t. d.
enie
d, 1
85 S
. Cr.
1125
(201
5) ("
Not
ably
, thi
s la
ngua
ge is
with
out l
imita
tion:
the
actu
al-in
jury
req
uire
men
t may
be
satis
fre d
sol
ely
by th
e in
vasi
on o
f a le
gal r
ight
that
Con
gres
scr
eate
d,.")
; Tou
rgem
an u
. Col
lins
Fin.
Ser
us.,
Inc.
, 755
F.3d
110
9, 1
114
(gth
Ct.2
0t4)
; Don
oghu
e u.
But
td,o
gIn
uest
ors
Gen
. P'sh
ip, 6
96 F
.gd
I7O
, L75
(2d
Cir.
2072
). But a
s th
is C
ourt
has
expÌ
aine
d, W
arth
doe
s no
tsu
ppor
t the
pro
posi
tion
that
Con
gres
s ha
s th
eco
nstit
utio
nal p
ower
to c
onfe
r st
andi
ng w
ithou
tac
tual
har
m. I
nste
ad, C
ongr
ess
crea
tes
new
cha
ins
ofca
usat
ion
agai
nst a
con
stitu
tiona
l ba
ckdr
op,
subj
ect
to th
e sa
me
stan
ding
req
uire
men
t of i
njur
y in
fact
as
any
othe
r cau
se o
f act
ion.
2. T
he lo
wer
cou
rts' r
eadi
ng o
f Wør
th w
ould
giv
eC
ongr
ess
plen
ary
auth
ority
ove
r st
andi
ng.
It is
bla
ck
1&ì: i'l: ... .)å f
23
lette
r law
that
eve
ry li
tigat
ion
requ
ires
a ca
use
ofac
tion,
an
inju
ry in
fact
, and
a re
med
y. C
ongr
ess
can
prov
ide
the
caus
e of
act
ion
and
the
rem
edy,
but
onl
yth
e lit
igan
t can
sup
ply
the
harm
, mak
ing
inju
ry in
fact
"a h
ard
floor
of A
rticl
e III
juris
dict
ion
that
cann
ot b
e re
mov
ed b
y st
atut
e."
Sum
mer
s u.
Eør
thIs
land
Inst
.,555
U.S
. 488
,497
(2O
Og)
.
The
low
er c
ourt'
s op
inio
n cr
ashe
s th
roug
h th
atflo
or. I
t al
low
s no
-inju
ry p
lain
tiffs
to u
se th
eex
iste
nce
of a
caus
e of
act
ion
anal
a re
med
y to
boot
stra
p th
emse
lves
stra
ight
pas
t the
inju
ry-in
-fact
requ
irem
ent
and
into
cou
rt. B
ut a
ithou
gh th
evi
olat
ion
of a
sta
tute
can
pro
vide
a c
ause
of a
ctio
nan
d a
rem
edy,
it ca
nnot
, by
itse
lf, r
esul
t in
an in
jury
in fa
ct.
Con
gres
s ha
s no
con
stitu
tiona
l aut
horit
y to
pas
s a
stat
ute
that
say
s ot
herw
ise.
Tln
e Lu
jøn
cour
t, in
inte
rpre
ting
the
War
th li
ne o
f câs
es, e
xplâ
ined
,"[S
tatu
tory
] br
oaile
ning
fof
l the
cat
egor
ies
of in
jury
that
may
be
alle
ged
in su
ppor
t of s
tand
ing
is a
diffe
rent
mat
ter f
oom
aba
ndon
ing
the
requ
irem
ent
that
the
pârty
see
king
revi
ew m
ust h
imse
lf ha
vesu
ffere
d an
inju
ry."
504
U.S
. at 5
78. A
rrd th
e C
ourt
in W
arth
reco
gniz
ed th
is lim
itatio
n as
wel
l-"O
fco
urse
, Ar
t. III
's re
quire
men
t re
mai
ns: t
he p
Ìain
tiff
still
mus
t alle
ge a
dis
tinct
and
pal
pabl
e in
jury
tohi
mse
lf, e
ven
if it
is a
n in
jury
sha
red
by a
larg
e cì
ass
of o
ther
pos
sibl
e lit
igan
ts."
War
th,4
22U
.S.
at 5
O\.
Alth
ough
Con
gres
s ha
s th
e po
wer
to cr
eate
ast
atut
ory
caus
e of
act
ion
and
rem
edy,
it c
anno
tco
nfer
sta
ndin
g on
a p
lain
tiff w
ho is
not
act
ually
harm
ed. F
or e
xam
ple,
prio
r to
the
pass
age
of th
eFa
ir C
redi
t Rep
ortin
g Ac
t (FC
RA)
, an
aggr
ieve
d
24pa
rty m
ight
hav
e be
en a
ble
to s
ue a
cre
dit r
epor
ting
agen
cy u
nder
any
num
ber o
f com
mon
law
or
stat
utor
y ca
uses
of a
ctio
n. B
ut in
ord
er to
hav
eAr
ticle
III s
tand
ing
to d
o so
, he
or s
he w
ould
nee
d to
alle
ge a
n ac
tual
inju
ry.
Con
gres
s ca
nnot
rem
ove
that
requ
irem
ent
bypa
ssin
g a
new
stâ
tute
. It c
an c
reat
e a
new
cau
se o
fac
tion
to s
impl
ify r
ecov
ery
for i
njur
ed p
artie
s. It
can
crea
te s
tatu
tory
dan
ages
in c
ases
whe
re a
ctua
lda
mag
es a
re s
mal
l or d
ifÊcu
Ìt to
asc
erta
in, a
nd it
can
crea
te a
righ
t of a
ctio
n in
case
s ot
herw
ise
barre
d by
prud
entia
l sta
ndin
g ru
les.
It ca
n ev
en c
reat
e a
new
Iega
l rig
ht th
e vi
olat
ion
of w
hich
may
giv
e ris
e to
ala
wsu
it, s
uch
as c
allin
g to
col
lect
a d
ebt a
_fte
r ace
rtain
hou
r at n
ight
. Wha
t it c
anno
t do
is e
limin
ate
the
requ
irem
ent
for a
n in
jury
in fa
ct th
at is
mor
eth
an th
e m
ere
viol
atio
n of
the
stat
ute
itsel
f. It
cann
ot"e
rase
Arti
cle
III's
stan
ding
requ
irem
ents
by
stat
utor
ily g
rant
ing
the
right
to s
ue to
a p
lain
tiff
who
wou
id n
ot o
ther
wis
e ha
ve s
tanù
ing.
" Røi
nes
u.By
rd,,
527
U.S
. 811
, 820
n.3
(199
7). O
ther
wis
e,st
andi
ng w
ould
be
limite
d on
ly b
y th
e w
ill of
Con
gres
s, n
ot th
e le
tter o
f the
Con
stitu
tion.
B.
A ro
bust
sta
ndin
g re
quire
rnen
the
lps
acco
mpl
ish,
rat
her
than
hind
ers,
the
goal
s of
sta
tuto
ry-
darn
ages
law
s.
Req
uirin
g a
party
see
king
stâ
tuto
ry d
amag
es t
osh
ow a
ctua
l har
m w
ould
not
onl
y co
nstra
in a
busi
vean
d un
fair
clas
s ac
tions
. It
wou
ld a
lso
bette
r ser
veth
e go
als
of s
tatu
tory
-dam
ages
law
s th
an th
e lo
wer
cour
t's u
nbou
nded
app
roac
h to
sta
ndin
g.
)äå;
i
ffi;r
'ii,Ê;
i *i :Í..
'åì I tj I I 1l i j il ,i I I : i I l ; l
25
Stat
utor
y da
mag
es s
erve
sev
era-
l pur
pose
s. T
hey
enco
urag
e ci
tizen
s to
enfo
rce
the
law
, whi
ch is
parti
cula
rly im
porta
nt â
t a ti
me
of s
trapp
ed s
tate
and
fede
ra-l
budg
ets.
The
y ea
se a
cces
s to
the
cour
tsby
allo
win
g fo
r rec
over
y, e
ven
whe
n da
mag
es a
resm
all o
r diff
icul
t to
quan
tify.
Arrd
they
hel
p to
ens
ure
com
plia
nce
by th
e in
dust
ries
they
regu
late
. Win
dfal
lcl
ass
actio
ns u
nder
mile
thes
e go
als.
1. L
egis
lativ
e hi
stor
y de
rnon
stra
tes
that
Con
gres
sen
acte
d st
atut
ory-
ilam
ages
law
s to
cor
rect
ser
ious
abus
es a
nd fi
ll ga
ps i¡
r the
law
, not
to a
llow
win
dfal
lcl
ass
actio
ns fo
r tec
hnic
al v
iola
tions
. For
inst
ance
,w
hen
it en
acte
d th
e Fa
ir D
ebt C
olle
ctio
ns P
ract
ices
Act,
Con
gres
s po
inte
d to
"the
use
of a
busi
ve,
dece
ptiv
e, a
nd u
nfai
r deb
t col
lect
ion
prac
tices
" th
at"c
ontri
bute
to th
e nu
mbe
r of p
erso
nal b
ankr
uptc
ies,
to m
arita
l ins
tabi
lity,
to th
e lo
ss o
f job
s, a
nd to
inva
sion
s of
indi
vidu
al p
rivac
y."
15 U
.S.C
. $ 1
692(
a).
It al
so n
oted
that
exi
stin
g la
ws
wer
e "in
adeq
uate
topr
otec
t con
sum
ers.
" 15
U.S
.C. S
169
2@).
Con
gres
sde
scrib
ed th
e ac
cura
te c
redi
t rep
ortin
g re
quire
men
tsin
the
FC
RA
as "e
ssen
tial t
o th
e co
ntin
ued
func
tioni
ng o
f the
ban
king
sys
tem
," an
d ne
cess
ary
toen
sure
that
repo
rting
age
ncie
s "e
xerc
ise
thei
r gra
vere
spon
sibi
litie
s w
ith fa
irnes
s, im
parti
ality
, and
are
spec
t for
the
cons
umer
's rig
ht to
priv
acy.
" 15
U.S
.C. $
168
1(a)
(1),
(a)(a
). Th
e le
ad H
ouse
spo
nsor
of
FAC
TA d
escr
ibed
the
legi
slat
ion
as c
ritic
al in
the
frght
aga
inst
iden
tity
thef
t, w
hich
ât t
he ti
me
was
estim
ated
to c
ost A
mer
ican
con
sum
ers
$50
billio
n a
year
. 149
Con
g. R
ec. 2
1734
(2O
O3)
(sta
tem
ent
ofR
ep.
26
Bach
us).s
In u
rgin
g hi
s co
lleag
ues
to su
ppor
tFA
CTA
, he
sugg
este
d it
was
as
"impo
rtant
in fi
nanc
eas
the
natio
nal i
nter
stat
e hi
ghw
ay s
yste
m is
to u
s in
trans
porta
tion.
" .Id
.
Thes
e la
ws
and
othe
rs li
ke th
em w
ere
enac
ted
toad
dres
s se
rious
abu
ses
that
thre
aten
ed n
ot o
nly
cons
umer
s, b
ut th
e fo
unda
tions
of t
he e
cono
my.
Con
gres
s cr
eate
d po
wer
fui t
oois
to e
nd th
ose
abus
esan
d m
ake
the
inju
red
who
le. B
ut a
wea
kene
d in
jury
-in
-fact
req
uire
men
t allo
ws
ente
rpris
ing
parti
es to
dire
ct th
ese
tool
s at
nar
row
tech
nica
l sta
tuto
ryvi
olat
ions
that
bea
r litt
le re
latio
n to
the
prob
lem
sC
ongr
ess
soug
ht to
add
ress
.2.
The
low
er c
ourts
' rul
e en
cour
ages
litig
atio
n to
redr
ess
tech
nica
l vio
latio
ns, i
nste
ad o
f foc
usin
glit
igat
ion
on th
e m
ost s
erio
us v
iola
tions
of s
tâtu
tory
right
s. T
he ju
dici
al s
yste
m is
alre
ady
expe
nùin
gsi
gnfic
ant
reso
urce
s ad
judi
catin
g th
ese
no-h
arm
,w
ind-
fall
clas
s ac
tions
. It
Leys
oto
u. M
ama
Mia
1.,
Inc.
, t}re
pla
intif
f sou
ght t
o br
ing
a w
ird-fa
ll cl
ass
actio
n on
beh
alf o
f 46,
000
mem
bers
for u
p to
$46,
000,
000
for t
echn
ical
vio
latio
ns o
f FAC
TA th
atca
used
no
harm
to th
e cl
ass
mem
bers
. 25
5 F.
R.D
.69
3,69
4-95
(S.D
. FIa
. 200
9). t
he d
efen
dant
was
aIo
cal r
esta
uran
t w
ith a
ppro
xim
atel
y 94
0,00
0 in
asse
ts. I
n an
othe
r FA
CTA
cas
e, L
opez
u. K
B To
ysR
etai
l, In
c., p
lain
tiff s
ough
t up
to 9
2.9
billio
n in
dam
ages
bec
ause
the
defe
ndan
t pr
inte
d th
e fir
stfo
ur, r
athe
r th
an ju
st th
e la
st fr
ve, d
igits
of h
is c
redi
tca
rd n
umbe
r. N
o. C
V 07
-144
-JFW
(C
Wx)
(C
.D. C
aI.
JuIy
18,
200
7) @
oc. 2
8). T
he fi
rst f
our d
isits
of a
27
cred
it ca
rd n
umbe
r pr
ovid
e no
info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
cust
omer
, bu
t rat
her
iden
tify
the
issu
ing
bank
. Id.
InPa
rher
u, T
ime
War
ner E
nter
taín
men
t C
o., L
.P.,
plai
ntiff
sou
ght c
ertif
icat
ion
of a
cla
ss o
f 12
milli
on to
purs
ue u
p to
$12
billi
on fo
r vio
latio
ns o
f the
Cab
lePr
ivac
y Ac
t. 33
1 F.
3d 1
3, 2
5-26
(2d
Ctu
. 200
3)(N
ewm
an,
J, c
oncu
rring
). Th
e Se
cond
Circ
uit n
oted
that
the
"pro
spec
t of a
stu
nnin
gly
larg
e da
mag
esaw
ard
loom
s as
the
resu
lt of
tech
nica
-l vi
olat
ions
of
the
Cab
le A
ct th
at a
ffect
pot
entia
lly m
illion
s of
subs
crib
ers.
" Id.
at 2
7. A
rrd in
Tay
lor u
. Acx
iom
Cor
pora
tion,
pla
intif
fs la
unch
ecl a
no-
harm
cla
ssac
tion
seek
ing
stat
utor
y da
mag
es u
nder
the
Driv
ers'
Priv
acy
Prot
ectio
n Ac
t of $
2,50
0 fo
r 20
milli
on c
lass
mem
bers
-for a
tota
l aw
ard
of $
5 tri
llion.
No.
2:0
7-cv
-000
1 (E
.D. T
ex. J
an.4
,20O
7) (D
oc. 1
). Th
ese
are
only
a fe
w o
f the
man
y no
-har
m, w
incl
fall
clas
sac
tions
that
hav
e be
en fi
led
unde
r st
atut
ory-
dam
ages
law
s. S
ee, e
.€'.,
Sch
euer
man
, sup
ra a
t, 10
4-07
, 111
-15.
Dec
ades
of e
xper
ienc
e ha
ve il
emon
stra
ted
that
clas
s ac
tions
tend
to fo
ilow
the
path
of l
east
resi
stan
ce. T
his
prob
lem
is
mos
t obv
ious
lyde
mon
stra
ted
by th
e ph
enom
enon
of t
he "p
iggy
-bac
lC'
or "c
oat-t
aii"
clas
s ac
tion
that
has
pla
gued
effo
rts to
enco
urâg
e pr
ivat
e en
forc
emen
t of t
he la
w. I
nste
ad o
ffrl
ling
enfo
rcem
ent g
aps,
"[e]
mpi
rical
dat
a sh
ow th
at. .
. cl
ass
actio
n la
wye
rs p
redo
min
antly
file
'copy
cat'
or 'c
oatta
il' Ia
wsu
its th
at fo
llow
on
the
heel
s of
gove
rnm
ent
inve
stig
atio
ns."
John
H.
Beis
ner,
Mat
thew
Sho
rs, J
essi
ca D
avid
son
MiII
er, C
loss
Actio
n "C
ops"
: Pub
lic S
erua
nts
or
Priu
ate
Entre
pren
eurs
?, 5
7 SI
AN. L
. REv
. 144
1, 1
453
(200
5).
The
reas
on is
pur
e do
llars
and
cen
ts--{
Iass
cou
nsel
5 Av
øila
b le
øt }
l'ttp:
//ww
w.
gpo.
gov
/fdsy
s/pk
g/C
REC
-200
3-09
-1O
/pcI
flCR
EC-2
003-
09-1
0.pd
f (a
st v
isite
d Ju
ly 7
, 201
5).
28
"pre
fer
'no
rese
arch
' law
suits
that
app
ear l
ikel
y(fr
om th
e in
vest
igat
ion
itsei
f) to
yie
ld lu
crat
ive
settl
emen
ts w
ith o
nly
a m
inim
al in
vest
men
t of t
ime
and
mon
ey."
Id. a
t 745
3-54
. As
a re
sult,
this
t¡1p
e of
clas
s ac
tion
fai-l
s to
"bro
aden
the
scop
e of
Ìaw
enfo
rcem
ent,
but r
athe
r on
ly in
tens
ifies
the
pena
lty."
John
C. C
offe
e, J
r., R
escu
íng
the
Priu
ate
Atto
rney
Gen
eral
: Why
the
Mod
,el o
f the
Law
yer
As B
ount
yH
unte
r Is
Not
Wor
hing
, 42
MD
. L. R
sv. 2
75, 2
23(1
e83)
.
Muc
h in
k ha
s be
en s
pille
d on
way
s to
bet
ter
chan
nel s
o-ca
lled'þr
ivat
e at
torn
eys
gene
rali'
tow
ard
frllin
g th
e ga
ps in
pub
lic e
nfor
cem
ent o
f the
law
. But
wea
keni
ng th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ct re
quire
men
t doe
s no
the
lp. B
ecau
se o
f the
com
mon
ality
and
typi
calit
yan
alys
is o
f Rul
e 23
(a),
clas
s co
unse
l hav
e an
ince
ntiv
e to
see
k ou
t nar
row
, tec
hnic
al v
iola
tions
of
the
law
. The
se a
ctio
ns a
re m
ore
likel
y to
sur
vive
the
certi
ficat
ion
proc
ess
and
resu
lt in
a p
rofrt
able
settl
emen
t. O
n th
e ot
her
hand
, the
mor
e se
rious
the
viol
atio
n, t
he m
ore
serio
us th
e ha
rm-a
nd th
e m
ore
com
plic
ated
the
fact
pat
tern
. If g
iven
the
choi
cebe
twee
n a
diffi
cult
case
invo
lvin
g ac
tual
har
m a
nd a
stra
ight
forw
ard,
no-
harm
cla
ss a
ctio
n, c
lass
cou
nsel
will
choo
se th
e la
tter.
3. F
inal
ly, a
lthou
gh C
ongr
ess
certa
inly
inte
nded
for c
itize
n-en
forc
emen
t of t
he la
w, d
oing
so
with
out a
mea
ning
ful s
tand
ing
requ
irene
nt r
aise
s th
e sp
ecte
rof
ove
renf
orce
men
t. As
this
Cou
rt ha
s re
cogn
ized
,w
hen
a go
vern
men
t age
ncy
is in
volv
ed,
a co
mpl
exba
lanc
ing
act h
elps
to li
mit
actio
ns to
thos
e th
at a
rem
ost i
mpo
rtant
. "An
age
ncy
gene
rally
can
not a
ctag
ains
t eac
h te
chni
cal v
iola
tion
of th
e st
atut
e it
isch
arge
d w
ith e
nfor
cing
." H
echl
er u
. Cha
ney,
4?0
U.S
.
.;ffi-
,#r
. ä .$ '.tu-
.,'ti -rr
l ä 'i ,ì: .ir !: ä f t, iì ll Ì. I i l ! ' :
.)o
821,
831
(198
5). R
athe
r, an
age
ncy
face
d w
ith a
clec
isio
n ab
out w
heth
er to
pur
sue
an e
nfor
cem
ent
actio
n "m
ust n
ot o
nly
asse
ss w
heth
er a
vio
latio
n ha
soc
curre
d,"
but m
ust a
lso
look
to "w
heth
er a
genc
yre
sour
ces
are
best
spe
nt o
n th
is v
iola
tion
or a
noth
er,
whe
ther
the
agen
cy is
like
ly to
succ
eed
if it
acts
,w
heth
er th
e pa
rticu
lar e
nfor
cem
ent a
ctio
n re
ques
ted
best
fits
the
agen
cy's
over
all p
olic
ies,
and
, ind
eed,
whe
ther
the
agen
cy h
as e
noug
h re
sour
ces
toun
derta
ke t
he a
ctio
n at
aIl.
" Id,
.
In p
rivat
e ac
tions
, the
doc
trine
of s
tand
ing,
and
parti
cula
rly it
s in
jury
-in-fa
ct r
equi
rem
ent,
serv
es a
role
as
a si
mila
r che
ck o
n ov
eren
forc
emen
t. C
ourts
are
not "
publ
icly
fund
ed fo
rum
.s fo
r the
ven
tilat
ion
ofpu
blic
grie
vanc
es o
r th
e re
finem
ent o
fju
rispr
uden
tial u
nder
stan
ding
." Va
lley
Forg
eC
hris
tíøn
CoI
I. u.
Am
eric
øtls
Un¿
ted
for S
epør
øtio
n of
Chu
rch
& St
ate,
Inc.
, 454
U.S
. 464
, 473
í982
).Vi
olat
ions
of t
he la
w, n
o m
atte
r ho
w s
erio
us, d
o no
tgi
ve li
tigan
ts "
a sp
ecia
l lic
ense
to ro
am th
e co
untry
''in
sea
rch
of w
rong
s to
righ
t. Id
. at 4
87. E
ven
in q
zitø
ln c
ases
, thi
s C
ourt
has
foun
d th
at re
lato
rs h
ave
stan
tling
not
on
the
basi
s of
a s
tatu
tory
vio
latio
n or
the
boun
ty th
ey w
ill re
ceiv
e if
the
suit
is s
ucce
ssfu
l,bu
t rat
her a
s an
ass
igne
e of
the
inju
ry in
fact
suffe
red
by th
e U
nite
d St
ates
. Ver
rnon
t Age
ncy,
529
U.S
. at 7
72-7
4.
Ove
renf
orce
men
t com
es a
t a c
ost;
it st
rails
judi
cial
reso
urce
s, c
hills
pro
duct
ive
activ
ities
, and
gene
rate
s un
fair
resu
lts. A
s co
mm
enta
tors
exam
inin
g th
is p
robl
em h
ave
reco
gniz
ed,
"Not
aII
subs
tant
ive
prin
cipl
es n
eces
saril
y w
arra
nten
forc
emen
t to
the
nth
degr
ee."
Ric
hard
A.
Nag
arec
la, A
ggre
gatio
n an
d lts
Dis
cont
ents
: Clø
ss
30
Settl
emen
t Pr
essu
re,
Cla
ss-W
ide
Arbi
tratio
n, a
ndC
AFA,
706
Cor
,rn¡.
L. R
Ev. 1
872,
188
4 (2
006)
.Th
e in
jury
-in-fa
ct re
quire
men
t cha
nnel
s lit
igat
ion
tow
ards
pro
duct
ive
ends
. It e
nsur
es th
at th
ose
who
have
act
ually
suf
fere
d ha
rm a
s a
resu
lt of
ano
ther
'sco
nduc
t are
dire
ctin
g lit
igat
ion
tow
ards
thos
eac
tiviti
es a
nd a
gain
st th
ose
parti
es th
at.c
ause
d th
eha
rm. W
ithou
t the
inju
ry-in
-fact
req
uire
men
t to
cons
train
them
, cla
ss re
pres
enta
tives
will
sim
ply
seek
the
mos
t luc
rativ
e ac
tion
for t
hem
selv
es,
rega
rdle
ss o
f the
soc
ial b
enef
it or
the
purp
ose
of th
est
atut
e in
que
stio
n.**
rr
Stat
utor
y da
mag
es s
erve
an
impo
rtant
purp
ose,
but
they
can
be
abus
ed,
parti
cula
rly w
hen
com
bine
d w
ith cl
ass
actio
ns. I
f thi
s C
ourt
wer
e to
adop
t the
sta
ndin
g ru
le e
nunc
iate
d by
the
low
erco
urt,
the
very
pro
blem
s th
e St
ates
wor
ked
so h
ard
to s
olve
-elim
inat
ing
abus
ive
clas
s ac
tions
thro
ugh
robu
st c
ertif
icat
ion
proc
edur
es a
nd re
duce
d pr
essu
reto
set
tle-a
re li
kely
to re
turn
.A
bala
nce
mus
t be
st¡u
ck b
etw
een
robu
sten
forc
emen
t of l
aws
mea
nt to
pro
tect
con
sum
ers
and
cost
ly, e
cono
mic
ally
des
truct
ive
win
dfal
l cla
ssac
tions
. For
tuna
tely
, the
Con
stitu
tion
has
alre
ady
stru
ck th
at b
alan
ce b
y re
quiri
ng a
ctua
l har
m fo
rAr
ticle
III s
tand
ing.
31
CoN
cl,u
sroN
The
Cou
rt sh
ould
rev
erse
the
Nin
th C
ircui
t
Res
pect
fully
sub
mitt
ed,
Luth
er S
trang
eAt
torn
e! G
ener
øl
Aldr
ew L
. Bra
sher
Solic
itor G
ener
alC
ouns
el o
f Rec
ord
Bret
t J. T
alle
yD
eput
y So
licíto
r Gen
eral
OFF
Í cE
oF
THE
AT,A
BAM
AAm
onN
ev G
p¡lo
n¡¡,
501
Was
hing
ton
Ave.
Mon
tgom
ery,
AL
3613
0(3
34) 2
42-7
300
abra
sher
@ag
o.st
ate.
al.u
sJu
Iy 9
, 201
5