+ All Categories
Home > Documents > T' ' CDMth in JOint Venture with Sml Wilbur Smith …nhai.org.in/spw/CorrespondenceIssues/Our letter...

T' ' CDMth in JOint Venture with Sml Wilbur Smith …nhai.org.in/spw/CorrespondenceIssues/Our letter...

Date post: 04-May-2018
Category:
Upload: voliem
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
8
CDM th Sml CDM Smith Inc. in JOint Venture with Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd. ~~ p' T'_' d ••••••• nvate Limne •••••• ENG"'tERS" PLANNtRS ~~ Wilbur Smith Associates ~- HOSUR - KRISHNAGIRI SECTION OF NH-7 CEI-Pj/NHAI/1213006/2012/009 September 13, 2012 i> The Project Director, NHAI, PIU - Krishnagiri, 7-E, 5 th Cross, Jakkappan Nagar, Krishnagiri, Tamil Nadu. Pin: 635001 (Kind Attn: Mr. C Bagavath Singh) Project: Six Laning of Hosur - Krishnagiri Section of NH-7 from Km 33.130 to Km 93.000 in the State of Tamil Nadu under NHDP Phase V as BOT (Toll) on DBFO Pattern Sub: Site Visit on September 05,2012 Ref: Review Meeting @ NHAI, PIU Office, Krishnagiri on September 05,2012 Dear Sir, We refer to the Site Visit by our Senior Bridge Design Engineer and Highway Design Engineer along with the Representatives of lE and the Concessionaire, and the subsequent Review Meeting @ NHAI, PIU Office, Krishnagiri on September OS, 2012. We would like to bring to your kind notice that the vertical clearance of the constructed Pedestrian Underpasses at Km 36+550(LHS),78+336 (Both sides) and 82+475(Both sides) were with 2.S0m ONLY. These structures were completed prior to 27 Aug 2012, when the Independent engineer was mobilized to site. We would like to put on record that these underpasses do not conform to the condition that the minimum vertical clearance should be 3.50m as per NHAI's Circular No. NHAI/2008/Road Safety/IRF/588 dated 12.07 .201~ (enclosing MoRT&H Circular No. RW/NH-35072/04/2004-S&R(R)dated 27.04.2010), "Ensuring Road safety - Engineering Measures". The Circular is enclosed for your reference and records. . In view of the above, you are requested to please take appropriate action for incorporation of Engineering Measures mentioned in the above sited Circular. Yours truly, For CDM Smith and Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd JV ~ ~~~ Xavier P J Team Leader Encl: 1. NHAI's Circular No. NHAI/2008/R ad Spfety/IRF/588 dated 12.07.2012 H~'1' ---'{. I, )}r;~; C.C: Chief Project Manager, Mfs-R~~ia.RGeiW.ti.r.rt¥-EI:Igl.ReeF5 P'I1t ttd'; Site Office, Hosur. CDM Smith/WSA Office, Bangalore. J
Transcript

CDMthSmlCDM Smith Inc.in JOint Venture with

Wilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd.

~~ p' T'_' d••••••• nvate Limne•••••• ENG"'tERS" PLANNtRS

~~Wilbur Smith Associates

~-

HOSUR - KRISHNAGIRI SECTION OF NH-7

CEI-Pj/NHAI/1213006/2012/009 September 13, 2012 i>

The Project Director,NHAI, PIU - Krishnagiri,7-E, 5th Cross,Jakkappan Nagar,Krishnagiri,Tamil Nadu.Pin: 635001

(Kind Attn: Mr. C Bagavath Singh)

Project: Six Laning of Hosur - Krishnagiri Section of NH-7 from Km 33.130 to Km 93.000 inthe State of Tamil Nadu under NHDP Phase V as BOT (Toll) on DBFO Pattern

Sub: Site Visit on September 05,2012

Ref: Review Meeting @ NHAI, PIU Office, Krishnagiri on September 05,2012

Dear Sir,

We refer to the Site Visit by our Senior Bridge Design Engineer and Highway Design Engineeralong with the Representatives of lE and the Concessionaire, and the subsequent Review Meeting@ NHAI, PIU Office, Krishnagiri on September OS, 2012.

We would like to bring to your kind notice that the vertical clearance of the constructedPedestrian Underpasses at Km 36+550(LHS),78+336 (Both sides) and 82+475(Both sides)were with 2.S0m ONLY. These structures were completed prior to 27 Aug 2012, when theIndependent engineer was mobilized to site. We would like to put on record that theseunderpasses do not conform to the condition that the minimum vertical clearance shouldbe 3.50m as per NHAI's Circular No. NHAI/2008/Road Safety/IRF/588 dated 12.07 .201~(enclosing MoRT&H Circular No. RW/NH-35072/04/2004-S&R(R)dated 27.04.2010),"Ensuring Road safety - Engineering Measures". The Circular is enclosed for your referenceand records. .

In view of the above, you are requested to please take appropriate action for incorporation ofEngineering Measures mentioned in the above sited Circular.

Yours truly,

For CDM Smith andWilbur Smith Associates Pvt. Ltd JV

~~~~Xavier P J

Team Leader

Encl: 1. NHAI's Circular No. NHAI/2008/R ad Spfety/IRF/588 dated 12.07.2012H~'1' ---'{.I, )}r;~;C.C: Chief Project Manager, Mfs-R~~ia.RGeiW.ti.r.rt¥-EI:Igl.ReeF5P'I1t ttd'; Site Office, Hosur.

CDM Smith/WSA Office, Bangalore. J

, '

~ I(d"ltI {1t{)tI (]\l1~ pt ~l~tfl{OI(~'tlftclt!-f 3fr{, ~r .~)National Highways Authority of India(Ministry of Road Transport and Highways);;ft-511ft 6. WfcMO, irRiIiT. -.:rf ~ -110075G-5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, New Delhi-110075

~ I PllOnn: 111-11-25074100/25074200t't;;m (Fax: 91-11-25093507 ( 2509351,4

tf<ffi./Extn.: 2223 I 2318 I 2468 I 2553

NHAI12008/Road SafetylIRF /5"gg Dated: 12.07.2010

Circular

Sub: Ensuring Road Safety-Engineering Measures as per directions ofMoRT&H- reg.

To ensure long term Road Safety on the Highways built so far, those being contemplated to beupgraded and ones beiag planned and designed, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. Govt of 'India vide letter No. RWINH-350 72/04/2004-S&R(R) dated 27.04.20 I0 (Copy enclosed) has issueddirections for adoption of certain Engineering Safety Measures (as contained therein) which areconsidered essecial in all central and centrally sponsored Projects as applicable to specific sitesituations.

2. As NHAI is implementing Central and Centrally sponsored projects, it has been approved 'byChairman, NHAI that necessary action for incorporation of Engineering Measures mentioned in thecircular of MoRT &H is to be taken by all Technical Divisions of NHAI handling projects which areinvarious stages of planning/design, implemention and O&M stage as per details given in the tablebelow. The reimbursement of extra cost to be incurred if any by the Concessionaire/Comractcr. forincorporating the Safety Measures, if not already covered in the concesslon/contract agreement, willbe as indicated in the table and the implementing Technical Division win take financial approvaldirectly from Competent Authority before getting them implemented. '

01 Where DPPJFcasibility report preparation is yetto be awarded.

The provisions to be incorporated in theTOR before the RFP is invited.

S.No Status of Project Action to be taken for incorporation ofGuidelines

02 • Where DPRlFeasibility study is in progress and finalreport is yet to be submitted.

Instructions to be. issued to theconsultants preparing the DPRIFeasibility study and Peer reviewconsultants that the design ate madeincorporating provisions oJ guidelines.

,d

03 Where'tlte DPRlFctlsibiHly report is submitted but The provision should be inccporeedtender of civil Worksl Concession is yet to be invitee before issue ofRFP.

A.

WhereRf'P has been invited but tenders not received Amendment incorporating provisionsappearing in the guidelines should bemade and issued. to aU prospectivebidders. If the provisions are notincluded in the RFP, then Civilconstruction cost may be suitably andreasonably revised for incorporation ofsafety items of work and approval ofCompetent Authorities.

Work competed and project is in O&M stage.

05 Where RFP is received and work awarded butcommencement yet to take place.

Guidelines to be incorporated- anddesign/drawing prepared and workexecuted accordingly. If the provisionsare not covered ill the scope of

I concessionaire/contractor, the cost of. additional items to be executed shall be

reasonably assessed and re-imbursed toconceasionalre/contractor as perprovisions of concession/contractagreement after approval of CompetentAuthority.Provision . of .Guidelines to beincorporated as per requirement on case

! to case basis. If the provisions are notcovered in the scope ofconcessionaire/contractor, the cost ofadditional items to be executed shall bereasonably assessed and re-imbursed-toconcessionaire/contractor as perprovisions of concession/contractagreement after approval of CompetentAuthority. .Guidelines' to be incorporated to. theextent possible on case to case basis. Ifthe provisions are not covered in the

I scope of c~~cessi~naire/conllactor, the, cost of additional Items to be executed

shall be reasonably assessed and re-imbursed to concessionairelcontractor asper provisions of concession/contractagreement after approval of Competent .Authority.

Contd. ID p.-3ML

06 Work in Progress.

01

3. The contents of this circular be circulated to all the Consultants. Contractors andConcessionaire ofNHAI.

4. . The compliance of the above should be ensured at an earliest by all technical divisions of .NHAr and reported to CGM (RSC) in Road Safety Cell at Gurgaon office ofNHAI.

S. This issues with the approval of Chairman, NHAI.

.(Am~J~-Chief General Manager

Encl : As above Circular No. RWINH-35072/0412004-S&R(R). dated 27.04.2010The Ministry of Road Transport &. Highways. Govt. of India, New Delhi

re,1. PS to Chairman2. PS to all Members3. All CGMS/CVO4. All GMslDGMslManagers5. All ROsIPIUS/CMUs6. Librarian/Hindi Officer

.:~r:fl'.SIT. / N.H.A.J.~.~.,~ I R.O., NAGPl1R

Copy also to : DO (Rn) &. SS for Infonnation

I3lJCfci If.I.INWARDNO.: 0 ot:z.O-I ~IDATE :&/J1/I:!' .

.) /r

-~~OVBRNMBNT OF J.NDIAMINfSTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT &. T:HGHWA YS

T renspon OImw,m.I. Parliament Street.New Oe\hi- \ 1000\

oiited~ 27th April, 2010No. RWINH-:iS072/04J2004-S&.R(R)

To

1. Secretary, PWDs of all State Governments I UTs dealing with NationalHighways. .

2. Engineer in Chief/Chief Engineers of all State Govts./UTs dealing withI~ational Highways:

3. Olairman, National Hlghways A\Jthorlty of IndIa (NHAl).'1, Director General (Border Roads), Seema Sadak 8hawan, Naralna.5'. Secretary General, lndlan Roads Congress, New Delhi,

Sub: Il.,?adSafely ~ Engineering Measures •

. Sir,

. A group of experts 'from various organIzations including this 1>1inlstry hav.edeliberated and suggested the engIneering measures to ensure road safety. Theseare endosed.

All central and centrally sponsored projetl:S shall be framed keeping In view.. these safety measures as applicabla to speclflc site Situations.

Enc\; N; above

''Ours faithfully, .

1~G:=-(Trivendra Kl.lmar)

Ey.eeutlve EngIneer SRl!r,i (RoadS)for otrector General (RD) &. SS

Copy with ~nclosure ft.'rv/arded for il,formatiofl and necessary action to:

L DG (RD) & SS2.. ADG3. All Chief Engineers of 1·1oRT&H<\. All ROS I ELOs of tilQRT&HS. IRF

CC,p',' tor informMion lo!

PPS tc Sc:uetarl rf':'&H

• 4-IEnclO~ule 10 MrnlsllYof Rood Transport & Highways 1611&(110, RWJNH.3507210412004-S&H(RJdaf9d'21~ April. 2010) .

Follow-Up of 4th IRF Regional Conference Recommendations"AcGiden£ prev9ntJonz.~9ad Safety M9<lSUreS"

Engineering Measure~ to ~nsurl) Road Safoty

1. Introduction

The eXisting rOAd accident scanarlo OR Indian reads is very grim and 1$ a matter 01serious concern ior all slakeholdelS. The Ministry or Roael Transport & Highways andIRF have jolnlly embarl<ed on ClMIssion to reduce falalities on Indian roads by 50% bythe year 2012. This Mission irlVollleaa mul\i.prong approach combining engineering.enforCement and education measure~. 'l'ne mu\ll·lane llighwaY$ beIng bU\\\ undervarious road oevelor:ment programtrf6s are adopting the geomeltlQ slao.dBIC!SspeoificaUons, slgnage, road markings, ele. as pe~ the provisiOns conlained In theCodes of Praetlce and the $tandBf(ls of the.lndian ~oads Congress 6upponed by theMinlsby's specifications. However, accident data dcmonsitate that motorists leave \heroadway for numerous reasons including errors of judge.m~ni. To ~nsure long termroad safety on these highways bUlH.$0 far, thbse being eonlemplateo 10 be upg~adedand \he ones being planMd and designed. the following engineering measures arecensldered essential for adoplion so as to help In improvil\g road safety loadln9 toreduclion of accidents:

Z. Geometry of the Road

For all'future mul(i.lane.highways wnere adequate laml is available. it is prererabl~ toprOvide Wide depreS$ed median having width of 12 m or more. but with w.·beam metalcrash barrlers at the edges of the mediall.

For multi-lane highways already developed ( being developed with raised median. illSessenUa\ lO provide W-beam me'al crash bamar in !he median along bo~' Ihacarriegeways. In case the two cllrrlag6'l/a/s are al differenllBvels. the median e.dge ofthe /ligner carriageway shall be provided with a W-l3eillll metal crash barrier. In case ofmurow medians. 2n' or less wllle, as generaUy provlded in urban areas. New Jersoytype concrete crash barriers should be used along Vli\h anti.glare screen for avoidance01headflghl glare.

hi urban areas. 1111 through lenas ilhould be 61 nennat width (3,5m) lOJ malnlaininguniform salcly, except al the approache$ 10Ihe junc\\on$ where Ine speoo is expecte<l\0 be VOIY IQW, Ihe lane Ylidth can be reduced \0 8 mInimum of 3.i m as per IRC codefor a length of alleast50 m in the apDroach

It is desirable \0 keep laleral Cleal1lnce along mum-lane h~hways 01 a\ le8S\ ~.5 m\'Iinlh IroR' tile edQIl of \hI' tatllagel'lay wl\l\Oul Clny ooslacles Wherever a permanenlObJt-ctcannot be removed for some reason, provision 01 fenders and hatard m8'l:el~with renectors musl be made. FlIrther.lranglble IIglWng columns and sign posls needbe used lor minimizing \he seventy in ease of ColliSion

111constrnined Gituallons wherl! deGP roild side drains wilh doplh of 1.0'" or morc eXls\(jnr-Iodln!) th~sa 9101'19the central median). \heso should be covered by concrete orsleel 9ralln95, and should ba ~lrotocl(!tIby W-bcam mf:ll(j\ crush I)arrier 10 prevenl U'II!

traffic ,rom Mt!!rint) seen deep dr3;ns

'Nl\t.lIOV~embankment hetgh\ 163 m O! (ClOU' \ho W.oeern metal crash barrier mus\ beprovided et the edQB or 'he !ormaUQn.<i~·. .

. For greeflof\n\:l projects of high 5peeClhlghwaY/expre~sV(ay, for onsUring eff~clivenessof recovery 'Zone a slope of 1:4 is required 10be provided, and slopes sleeporth3R 1:4$h31\b& provided with W·baam metal crash barriers for safQly of the traffic.

3. SlI!>8ration of Local Trnffte

For the sa£etyo( \rafflo operation, 11\aUcases of multi.lane highways, local !fallie has IQbe sepclfBled I seQregated from IhelhroVgh traffic plying 00 the mulll-leli9 carrlBg&Wayby <ll1oplion 01 sullably designed 7 m wide (absolule minimum 5.5 m wide) seNiceroad& with safety fence, railings, etc. of robust and vantlal proof design. To enable lhetraffic on the sorvlce reads to cross over to the othet slde cl lha mulll-lane cllrrlogewat,SUilably designed cross connections as cat\le underpass. pe!leslria1'l underpass andvehicular underpass shall be prQvlded.

In CBSI)S of open area wilhoul roadside d&velojnlenlS, where there is no provi~ion ofservIce roads, \0 protect lraffic from leaving Ihe t\ighway, it Is essential 10 prOVide anadditional wioUI 01 the" paved shoulder w!1h t'ldgd melting and ribbed pavement of alIOBst0.25 m widlh .

.\n order to ensure \hal ael'Viee roads are always available for safe movement of localIrafflt, h. Is nece&alty to provide requisite palking facinUes for the local IPT andcommercial trafflo. Also, suitably deslone<:l truck laybye or tNcX parking are~s forhIghway truc\( traffic I~ a must to ovoid parking on road side, leading 10 the sefeopera lion of hIgh speod traffic on highways

<1. ?~dotlrian Facility

In tile urbanIze:;! seol1oo6, adeC\UelO pedeslrian lacillties are \0 be planned anddeslgne\1 as part oUlls muili-Iano highway so thal the pedestrians ate not required 10enter .Ihe main carrlager'lBY. for satety of the petle&lrlsns, BpproprllllelY desIgnedfootpaths with robust railings shall be provided at the outer edge of the sorvice roadswith ClOSS over faclllUes m;e u"dorpass of fool over bridge (FOB). .

All podestrian underpasses..ShaU.hllve a minimum 7 m Width, \'lilh e '/lll'\ic.al clearanceofS.S"m. . -

5. Bus 9ays

In slluaUons where p8$&Ongcrs have 10 board or alight from the buses. suitablydesigned bus bays at desired locations shall be provided along Ihe main carriageway,bul using extre width togethor with approach and 01(11 Irans\1iQn lanes. AI suchlocaUons, the arrangement for \he dispersal 01 lne passengers have to be designedduly conSitlerlng theIr safety. \.0 In no case (leO&strlan shoulO be teQulred \0 enler themain caniagQW8'1 for cross oval or aven 10 move along the highway. The passengelS[P&d03tr\Qn) should move 10 the 100lpaU\:\ provided along the servtce roadS, and thenuse fhe cross over la<:iIIUeslike FOil. undef\)I)S$, etc

G. illuminations

S\re\ches '=11\he mu;U·lilIlC IllghllayS In tlJill'uP areas. Ihe underpasseG and Fool OV()tBridges (FOBi shallllEl aooQu3tCl\y iIIummslt!d. fl)r which ilPproprlav> deSign Shall be,adopted so Ihat ;) m'nllllum cl 1.0 lu~ 'S acni(!'1able with 24 nour :lowor supply, Ir~uired 5uflPOl160 >.1'/ S(l:;u !:It/wer

,;"': :0"

/

.=======~============.,,====~. ----

i -

t, OC'fclopmen\ QI Junc\lon

T~e crosslt'lg of a mult~lal\e hlghWit,' by ~ primarY rO,ad (National HighwlI'J I .StaleHIOhway) shaU always bl! through'a gmdo,separalOr. In CU99 01 other calegones 01r()3d~ (MOR I OOR and VR), aCcess· shall be provided to 1he mum.lane higlw/~Ythorough sorviee roads only, In all sui:h~calies, the cross roads shall.be brought to Ihelevel 01 tha service roads and lIared'for eppr'oprial6 IMQl.h, and slop" I yield Ine 3ndcenlerlhe,mart;ingo.shall be provided. In add't\On, fumble smps/ speed maker $hallalao bel provi:.\Gd on each !;fOSS road With wamlng $lgn and road markings for thesame. At all enlry and exit, to and from tne high speed highway, lhe· mergIng anddiverging shall bll onlt through 8uilabfy de$ignt(\ aooelefation and dooeletalion lanes.'he at-grade junction below \he giade .separaron should 'De designed willl properchannelisatlon of traffic- flows am:! lo prevent undesirable movement (like Wfong-waymovement). The 90re area $hall be mer1<ed art:! delIneated by raneotorized hazardmaiker sign; and vlherever appropriate. to be provided vlithcrash cushion faclHly also.

6. Slgnllgos

Signagesand markings have ·to be developed In an intBQraled manner and shallcomp'lyC!to Ihe standard:; laid dn~~ by the Indian Roads Congress. All signs andmarklng~ shall be of relro·reflective Iype only.

<I) All CUlVEI$ 'Hitl1 R < 750 m la be delineated on outer side of Ihe CUlVefrom bO~hthe IIlrections (for RH curve il will be on shoulder and for lH curve h will be onmedian), by chevron signs.

tU) Ali l)moanl<menls with height 3 m or more shall have W-bcam mp-Ial crashbamers wilt! delIneating renactors fined on tnam.

(ill) 1n low embankments and flat curves, Where crash'barrlers are notprovided,lheseneed to be delineated by 1.6 m hgh rellectolized delineators.

(iv) One-way reneclive road,s\udS Shull be pro'Vldadon edge lines end lane lines DOthe approach to an interseCtion or a high level bridgelculverVROB eto with highembDnkment. Also, such sluds shall be provided along 1'e sharp curves.

9. Traffic CalmIng & Saloty Manllgomont Measures

IJ'lherellef mul\i·lene hiQhwilf passes l\lrO\lgh built up areas, designs should be suchas 10 bring about a reductlon In \he speod \0 Ihe level of 60 I 70 l<mph: To achievethis, repealud bar markings (raised bars with graduony rCCiuci"Q spscings) wilh hot·applied relro-renective Illermo-plastic. while paints shall be proYlded at the apprlXleh!!s10 such bui'lllp areas.

10. 8ridgC'S I CD Structurcs

In the approaches 10 and exll from. bridges and other CD slructures, VII-beam molalcrash barriers shall be prOVide<! in conUnualion 01 1110 parapet 01\ bOlh Ihacarriageways for al loa513Q m in addl~on 10 hazald n'ar):er sIgns.

11, Mlseeuanceus

Al speciallocalions like opon well or pond 01the village. eie along me 11Ign-//if/IOCilladerose 10 Ihp.fonnatio:l of U'e hlyhwov. 'N-heam mOlal Clash bamer shall be. rJfOv1de1 (oraU1l1opriillr: IcngU' for IIm 5!l!ol'l of \raflic 'J~crtlli(\n olllM lIighVlB"

-


Recommended