+ All Categories
Home > Documents > T21C-11 Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka ...€¦ · Active Faulting and Folding in the...

T21C-11 Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka ...€¦ · Active Faulting and Folding in the...

Date post: 25-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
17 43 Axial surfaces bisect the and terrace surfaces. Measured terrace profile, dashed where approximate. Circles and small numbers show differential GPS data points. The error in instrument precision is smaller than the circle symbol. Predicted terrace profile from the fault-bend fold model. The model assumes that incremental deformation occurs by pure kink folding, similar to the deformation seen in the strata Flat and ramp geometry thrust fault. Layered sandstone and Formation, schematical 37 Apparent dip in bedding f 118 X EXPLANATION OF CROSS SECTION SYMBOLS (1)Dept. Geological Sci., U. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; (2)Dept. Geological Sci., U. of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; (3)National Academy of Sciences, Inst. of Seismology, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan; (4)Dept. Geosciences, Pennsylvania State U., Un Thrust fault. Dashed where approximate, dotted where concealed. U = upthrown side, D = downthrown side. Axial surface in Neogene strata. Arrowed side has the steeper dip and points in the down-dip direction. Strike and dip Elevation (meters) 4664800 4665000 4665200 4665400 4665600 4665800 4666000 4666200 4666400 4666600 4666800 4667000 4667200 4667400 4667600 4667800 4668000 4668200 UTM Northing (meters) 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 1050 1100 1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650 1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka Intermontane Basin of the Ky South South Plan view Section view Axial Surface "A" Axial Surface "B" Axial Surface "C" Axial Surface "D" 37 25 43 45 18 17 15 20 17 30 16 40 40 47 50 40 40 45 30 0 0 0 40 43 30 T21C-11 Stephen Thompson (1), Ray Weldon II (2), Kanatbek Abdrakhmatov(3), Martin Miller (2), Rob Langridge (2), Mike Bullen (4), Kim McLean (5), Ch 70˚ 70˚ 72˚ 72˚ 74˚ 74˚ 76˚ 76˚ 78˚ 78˚ 80˚ 80˚ 40˚ 40˚ 42˚ 42˚ 44˚ 44˚ K a z a k h P l a t f o r m Fergana Valley Tarim Basin China Kazakhstan Kazakhstan Uzbekistan L. Issyk-Kul Chu Valley 17 0 17 43 43 0 0 43 15 1. INTRODUCTION Deformed Neogene strata and Pleistocene river terraces record basinward-propagating thrust faulting along the southern margin of Kochkorka Valley, an intermontane basin in the Kyrgyz Tien Shan of central Asia (Figures 1 and 2). The Tien Shan, which likely accommodate 1/2 to 1/3 of the modern India/Eurasia relative plate motion (Abdrakhmatov et al., 1996, Nature,384, 450-453), offer an opportune glimpse into the process of intracontinental mountain building. Fundamental to understanding the kinematic evolution of the Kyrgyz central Tien Shan is to characterize how strain is partitioned between its "foreland" and intermontane basins. The preservation of multiple, clearly deformed fluvial terraces and nearly continuous exposure of underlying Neogene sediments make the southern margin of Kochkorka basin particularly favorable for determining the geometry, style, and rate of shortening within an intermontane basin. Our preliminary interpretation suggests that the north-vergent, basinward-propagating structure is best explained by a fault-bend fold geometry with a daylighting frontal thrust fault. Progressively deformed strath terraces deform in a manner grossly similar to models that assume kink-band folding. Terrace deformation does not fit the model in detail. Semi-independent estimates of the amount of shortening, using fold height and fold area, compare favorably and support the fault-bend fold model as a viable hypothesis for the structural geometry. Based on radiocarbon ages of the lowest profiled terrace and the fold geometry, we estimate the rate of shortening to be 1.7 (+1.6 / -1.3) mm/yr. Our best estimate suggests that the southern margin of Kochkorka basin accomodates about one-tenth of the shortening across the central Tien Shan as determined by GPS geodesy. 2. METHODS We mapped the Neogene structure and Pleistocene terrace surfaces along the north-flowing Djuanarik River using 1:50,000 scale stereo air photographs and 1:100,000 scale topographic maps (40m contour interval) (Figure 4). We profiled four sets of progressively deformed Pleistocene fluvial terraces plus the present Djuanarik River using differential GPS (Figure 3). We measured over 70 points along the ~7 km of river from the mountain front to the frontal thrust fault. The terraces are incised into Neogene sandstone and siltstone, and are on top of 1-5 m of coarse fluvial gravel. Eolian silt and colluvial silt and sand cap the terraces. We consistently measured at the contact between fluvial gravel and overlying loess and colluvium at the top of each terrace riser. Uncertainties in the GPS measurements are on the order of centimeters; uncertainties in the location of the contact are on the order of centimeters to decimeters. Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and land snail shell, collected from the deposits capping the lowest deformed terrace (Qt III(2)), provides minimum ages for paleo-river abandonment and terrace formation. We were unsuccessful collecting datable material from older surfaces. Shell material was cleaned by hand-picking and ultrasonic cleaning, then treated with dilute H2O2 and leached with dilute HCl, to destroy organic material and soil carbonate accreted to the shell surfaces. Powder X-ray defraction (XRD) analyses on shell show no measureable soil carbonate or alteration from primary aragonite to calcite. Charcoal samples were prepared by standard techniques. All samples were dated at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS) at Lawrence Livermore National Labs. Figure 2. Central Tien Shan mountains of Kyrgyzstan and China, showing major faults and the study area. Figure 1. DEM of northern India and central Asia. Figure 3. GPS antenna and surveyor measuring the height of a Pleistocene terrace relative to a simultaneously-recording base station. Photo is looking North down the Djuanarik River. The fault-bend fold is in the middle distance. Figure 4. Map of structure and Pleistocene terrace surfaces, southern Kochkorka basin. Base is a mosaic of two aerial photographs Figure 5. Photomosaic of the Djuanarik River ramp anticline. View is to the west. The four terrace surfaces profiled are marked by orange, green, red, and blue dashed lines (in order of increasing terrace age and height). Locations of axial surfaces are magenta lines. Notice the active mountain front at the far left of the photo; the older two terraces are offset by a range-bounding fault. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I - Terrace profiles and cross section. Well-defined dip panels within exposed Neogene sediments result from bedding-parallel slip on underlying ramp and flat fault structure (Figures 5 and 6). The modeled structure is a modification of a simple fault-bend fold with conservation of line length and bedding thickness (Suppe, 1983, Am J. Science, 283, 684-721). A daylighting frontal thrust fault constrains the depth to detachment, approximately 1200 meters below the modern river. The rear axial surface ("A") of the fault-bend fold is manifested by an abrupt start of a 1- 5 degree backtilt of the terrace profiles. The cumulative amount of shortening along the underlying fault is recorded by relative uplift of the terraces and northward growth of the backtilted surface; the hinge of each successively older terrace has clearly propagated more to the north, consistent with material moving up a subsurface thrust fault ramp. The forelimb deformation seen in the older terrace surfaces coincides with the dip panel change in the underlying Neogene strata (axial surface "C"). While the coincidence of terrace and underlying Neogene deformation is consistent with the modeled structure, terrace deformation is not as dramatic as predicted by pure kink-band folding (short dashed lines on Figure 6 and inset). Alternative structural interpretations are welcome. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION II - Evolution of the Djuanarik ramp a The panels to the right illustrate our concept for the history of the Djuanarik modeled as a fault-bend fold with conservation of line length and bedding of the structure. This sequence illustrates a possible evolution of basinwa Kochkorka basin. 43 U D 100 101 98 150 102 110 96 95 148 111 151 94 147 112 103 113 114 146 144 92 152 93 115 91 143 116 117 90 32 base 142 89 118 88 140 87 86 81 119 85 84 82 10 11 83 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X [ X 22 12 21 14 g 1 g2 b1 b2 d1 d2 a1 a2 d0 d0 d0 d0 g( i) = arctan [(sin a( i) - sin a( i-1)) / ( sin a( i-1) tan b( i) + c d( i) = (d0( sin a( i) - sin a( i-1)) / sin g( i) Model of terrace deformation using the kink method of folding (amount of shortening; direction of material flow) a( i) : b( i) : g (i) : d( i) : bedding & fault dip axial surface orientation angle of terrace deflection length of deformed terrace section Kochkorka basin area of study Figure 6. Qt III(2) Qt III(1) Qt II(2) Qt II(1) PLEISTOCENE TERRACE STRATIGRAPHY, adopting nomenclature of Kyrgyz and Russian workers older Oldest preserved geomorphic surface in the study area; remnants are isolated along the margins of Qt II(2) Most widespread upper surface; this is a typical geomorphic position for "Q II" terraces in the Krygyz Tien Shan. Based on extrapolating the Q III(2) slip rate, the "Q II" terraces are likely close to 100,000 years old. Oldest of the "Q III" level terraces; remnants in the study area are narrow and poorly preserved. Slip rate extrapolation suggests that the terrace is about 30,000 years old, so should be datable by radiocarbon. Youngest of the obviously deformed terraces. Radiocarbon dates of land snail shell and charcoal suggest that this terrace was abandoned about 6,000 years ago. MAP SYMBOLS
Transcript
Page 1: T21C-11 Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka ...€¦ · Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka Intermontane Basin of the Kyrgyz Tien Shan, Central Asia South North

1743

Axial surfaces bisect the angle of change of dip in bedding, faults,and terrace surfaces.

Measured terrace profile, dashed where approximate. Circles and small numbers show differential GPS data points. The error in instrument precision is smaller than the circle symbol.

Predicted terrace profile from the fault-bend fold model. The model assumes that incremental deformation occurs by pure kink folding, similar to the deformation seen in the strata Flat and ramp geometry; detachment fault and low- to moderate-angle

thrust fault.

Layered sandstone and siltstone of the Pliocene (?) Djuanarik Formation, schematically drawn.

37 Apparent dip in bedding from field measurements

118X

EXPLANATION OF CROSS SECTION SYMBOLS

(1)Dept. Geological Sci., U. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; (2)Dept. Geological Sci., U. of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403; (3)National Academy of Sciences, Inst. of Seismology, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan; (4)Dept. Geosciences, Pennsylvania State U., University Park, PA, 16802; (5)Dept. Geology, Central Washington U., Ellensburg, WA 98926

Thrust fault. Dashed where approximate,dotted where concealed. U = upthrown side,D = downthrown side.

Axial surface in Neogene strata. Arrowedside has the steeper dip and points in the down-dip direction.

Strike and dip

Ele

vatio

n (m

eter

s)

4664800 4665000 4665200 4665400 4665600 4665800 4666000 4666200 4666400 4666600 4666800 4667000 4667200 4667400 4667600 4667800 4668000 4668200 4668400 4668600

UTM Northing (meters)

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150

2200

2250

2300

2350

2400

2450

2500

700

750

800

850

900

950

1000

1050

1100

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

2050

2100

2150

2200

2250

2300

2350

2400

2450

2500

Active Faulting and Folding in the Kochkorka Intermontane Basin of the Kyrgyz Tien Shan, Central Asia

South North

4668800

NorthSouth

Plan viewSection view

Axial Surface "A"Axial Surface "B"

Axial Surface "C" Axial Surface "D"

37 25

4345

18 1715

2017 30

16 40 40

47

5040 40

45

30 0

0

0

40 43 30

T21C-11Stephen Thompson (1), Ray Weldon II (2), Kanatbek Abdrakhmatov(3), Martin Miller (2), Rob Langridge (2), Mike Bullen (4), Kim McLean (5), Charlie Rubin (5), Meghan Miller (5), Doug Burbank (4)

70˚

70˚

72˚

72˚

74˚

74˚

76˚

76˚

78˚

78˚

80˚

80˚

40˚ 40˚

42˚ 42˚

44˚ 44˚K a z a k h P l a t f o r m

Fergana Valley

Tarim B

asin

Chi

na

Kaz

akhs

tan

Kazakhstan

Uzbekistan

L. Issyk-Kul

C h u V a l l e y

170 1743

430

043

15

1. INTRODUCTION

Deformed Neogene strata and Pleistocene river terraces record basinward-propagating thrust faulting along the southern margin of Kochkorka Valley, an intermontane basin in the Kyrgyz Tien Shan of central Asia (Figures 1 and 2). The Tien Shan, which likely accommodate 1/2 to 1/3 of the modern India/Eurasia relative plate motion (Abdrakhmatov et al., 1996, Nature,384, 450-453), offer an opportune glimpse into the process of intracontinental mountain building. Fundamental to understanding the kinematic evolution of the Kyrgyz central Tien Shan is to characterize how strain is partitioned between its "foreland" and intermontane basins. The preservation of multiple, clearly deformed fluvial terraces and nearly continuous exposure of underlying Neogene sediments make the southern margin of Kochkorka basin particularly favorable for determining the geometry, style, and rate of shortening within an intermontane basin. Our preliminary interpretation suggests that the north-vergent, basinward-propagating structure is best explained by a fault-bend fold geometry with a daylighting frontal thrust fault. Progressively deformed strath terraces deform in a manner grossly similar to models that assume kink-band folding. Terrace deformation does not fit the model in detail. Semi-independent estimates of the amount ofshortening, using fold height and fold area, compare favorably and support the fault-bend fold model as a viable hypothesis for the structural geometry.

Based on radiocarbon ages of the lowest profiled terrace and the fold geometry, we estimate the rate of shortening to be 1.7 (+1.6 / -1.3) mm/yr. Our best estimate suggests that the southern margin of Kochkorka basin accomodates about one-tenth of the shortening across the central Tien Shan as determined by GPS geodesy.

2. METHODS

We mapped the Neogene structure and Pleistocene terrace surfaces along the north-flowing Djuanarik River using 1:50,000 scale stereo air photographs and 1:100,000 scale topographic maps (40m contour interval) (Figure 4). We profiled four sets of progressively deformed Pleistocene fluvial terraces plus the present Djuanarik River using differential GPS (Figure 3). We measured over 70 points along the ~7 km of river from the mountainfront to the frontal thrust fault. The terracesare incised into Neogene sandstone andsiltstone, and are on top of 1-5 m of coarse fluvial gravel. Eolian silt and colluvial silt and sand cap the terraces. We consistently measured at the contact between fluvial gravel and overlying loess and colluvium at the top of each terrace riser. Uncertainties in the GPS measurements are on the order of centimeters; uncertainties in the location of thecontact are on the order of centimeters to decimeters.

Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and land snail shell, collected from the deposits capping the lowest deformed terrace (Qt III(2)), provides minimum ages for paleo-river abandonment and terrace formation. We were unsuccessful collecting datable material from older surfaces. Shell material was cleaned by hand-picking and ultrasonic cleaning, then treated with dilute H2O2 and leached with dilute HCl, to destroy organic material and soil carbonate accreted to the shell surfaces. Powder X-ray defraction (XRD) analyses on shell show no measureable soil carbonate or alteration from primary aragonite to calcite. Charcoal samples were prepared by standard techniques. All samples weredated at the Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS) at Lawrence Livermore National Labs.

Figure 2. Central Tien Shan mountains of Kyrgyzstan and China, showing majorfaults and the study area.

Figure 1. DEM of northern India and central Asia.

Figure 3. GPS antenna and surveyor measuring the height of a Pleistocene terrace relative to a simultaneously-recording base station. Photo is looking North down the Djuanarik River. The fault-bend fold is in the middle distance.

Figure 4. Map of structure and Pleistocene terrace surfaces, southern Kochkorka basin. Base is a mosaic of two aerial photographs

Figure 5. Photomosaic of the Djuanarik River ramp anticline. View is to the west. The four terrace surfaces profiled are marked by orange, green, red, and blue dashed lines (in order of increasing terrace age and height). Locations of axial surfaces are magenta lines. Notice the active mountain front at the far left of the photo; the older two terraces are offset by a range-bounding fault.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION I - Terrace profiles and cross section.

Well-defined dip panels within exposed Neogene sediments result from bedding-parallel slip on underlying ramp and flat fault structure (Figures 5 and 6). The modeled structure is a modification of a simple fault-bend fold with conservation of line length and bedding thickness (Suppe, 1983, Am J. Science, 283, 684-721). A daylighting frontal thrust fault constrains the depth to detachment, approximately 1200 meters below the modern river. The rear axial surface ("A") of the fault-bend fold is manifested by an abrupt start of a 1- 5 degree backtilt of the terrace profiles. The cumulative amount of shortening along the underlying fault is recorded by relative uplift of the terraces and northward growth of the backtilted surface; the hinge of each successively older terrace has clearly propagated more to the north, consistent with material moving up a subsurface thrust fault ramp. The forelimb deformation seen in the older terrace surfaces coincides with the dip panel change in the underlying Neogene strata (axial surface "C"). While the coincidence of terrace and underlying Neogene deformation is consistent with the modeled structure, terrace deformation is not as dramatic as predicted by pure kink-band folding (short dashed lines on Figure 6 and inset). Alternative structural interpretations are welcome.

4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION II - Evolution of the Djuanarik ramp anticline

The panels to the right illustrate our concept for the history of the Djuanarik ramp anticline(Figures 7A-F), where the deformation is modeled as a fault-bend fold with conservation of line length and bedding thickness. The green "pin" marks cumulative movement of the structure. This sequence illustrates a possible evolution of basinward-propagated deformation into the southern margin of Kochkorka basin.

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

43

U

D

99100

101

98

150

102

110

9695

148111

151

94

147

112

103

113114

146144

92

152

93

115

91

143

116117

90

32

base

142

89

118

88

140

87

86

81

119

85

8482

1011

83 X

XX

XX

X XX X X

X

X X

X X

X

XX X X

X

XX

X X XX X X X X

X X

XXX X X X X

X X X XX

X X X

X

[

X

2212

2114

g 1

g2

g3 g4

b1b2

d1

d2 d3 d4

a1a2

a3

a4

b3

d0

d0d0

d0 d0

d0

g( i) = arctan [(sin a( i) - sin a( i-1)) / ( sin a( i-1) tan b( i) + cos a( i))]d( i) = (d0( sin a( i) - sin a( i-1)) / sin g( i)

Model of terrace deformation using the kink method of folding

(amount of shortening; direction of material flow)

a( i) :

b( i) :

g (i) :

d( i) :

bedding & fault dip

axial surface orientation

angle of terrace deflection

length of deformed terrace section

paleo-river profile B

B

B

B

J

J

J

J

H

H

H

H

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

A. Initial condition: flatlying Neogene sediments. Future trace of ramp-flat-ramp fault shown by dashed red line; future axial surfaces as dashed purple lines. Vertical green pin line at left will mark the cumulative shortening.

B. Initial movement along the ramp-flat-ramp structure creates a fault-bend fold.

C. The back limb of the fault-bend fold is developed. Lateral planation of a Pleistocene river (dashed magenta line - stream gradient is 1˚) erodes a bedrock strath and will become a strain marker for subsequent shortening. The trace of a future gound-rupturing fault is projected to branch from the second flat. The exact stage of development of the fault-bend fold is arbitrary.

F. A simplified version of the modern Djuanarik ramp anticline. Note that the amount of shortening of each terrace surface can be measured either by 1) the length of the back limb, 2) the vertical height of the anticline (above its former river trace) divided by the sine of the ramp angle, 3) the cross-sectional area of uplift, divided by the depth to detachment (if known), 4) change in line length. For this poster we estimate shortening using methods 2) and 3).

E. Deformation of younger (yellow) terrace (axial surfaces in light yellow). Note propagation of back and front axial surfaces of older (magenta) terrace. Blue dashed line marks the "modern" river, which has incised deeper.The short black line segment connecting the magenta terrace to the river marks the land surface.

D. The terrace surface deforms in response to movement along the underlying structure. Note the propagation of back and front axial surfaces marking terrace deformation (pink), which are independent of changes in dip in the underlying strata. Inactive axial surfaces are in faded purple. Yellow dashed line indicates river incision and future inset terrace surface. Also note we do not account for flexure in the footwall.

Kochkorka basin

area of study

SHORTENING

RADIOCARBON DATING*

sample name terrace material cm above 14C age (1s ) calibrated age (2s )

river gravel (yr B.P.)** (yr B.P.)†

97TS-K-15 Qt III(2) snail shell 26 5520 ±50 6300 +110 / -3097TS-K-16 Qt III(2) charcoal 2 5220 ±70 5960 +220 / -7097TS-K-29s Qt III(2) snail shell <2 5730 ±40 6490 +150 / -7097TS-K-29c Qt III(2) charcoal <2 5580 ±60 6360 +130 / -80________________________________

* Analyses performed at Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (CAMS), Lawrence Livermore National Labs** Half-life of 5568 yr. d 13C for shells was estimated -6 ‰; d 13C for charcoal -25 ‰.† Calibrated using the program CALIB 3.0.3c (Stuiver and Reimer, 1993, Radiocarbon, 35, 215-230). Intercepts from method A; 2s uncertainty by method B (probability distribution).

Figure 6.

B maximumJ best estimateH minimum

paleo-river estimates

1.7 mm/yr s

hortening ra

te

extrapolated fro

m Qt III(2

)

Thousands of years (hypothetical)

Cum

ulat

ive

shor

teni

ng, i

n m

eter

s

Figure 8. Plot of cumulative shortening (from Estimate A) vs time, based on extrapolating the most favorable slip rate determined for Qt III(2).

Qt II(1)

Qt II(2)

Qt III(1)

Qt III(2)

Estimate A: from maximum terrace surface uplift above the projected paleo-river profile.

Maximum uplift divided by sine of ramp angle

maximum* / minimum** best estimate***Qt II(1) 237 m / 151 m 156 mQt II(2) 196 m / 139 m 146 mQt III(1) 85 m / 52 m 59 mQt III(2) 21 m / 2.5 m 11 m

Estimate B: from area of terrace uplift above the projected paleo-river profile.

Area of terrace uplift divided by depth to detachment (below projeted paleo-stream)

maximum / minimum best estimateQt II(1) 283 m / 148 m 154 mQt II(2) 231 m / 139 m 147 mQt III(1) 102 m / 50 m 58 mQt III(2) 28 m / 2.7 m 11 m

_____________________________

* Maximum: assumes the river has maintained the same gradient and elevation through time.** Minimum: assumes the river has incised through time and lesser paleo-river gradien.t *** Best estimate: assumes the river has incised through time and paleo-river gradient was similar to present.

Qt III(2)

Qt III(1)

Qt II(2)

Qt II(1)

PLEISTOCENE TERRACE STRATIGRAPHY, adopting nomenclature of Kyrgyz and Russian workers

old

er

Oldest preserved geomorphic surface in the study area; remnants are isolated along the margins of Qt II(2)

Most widespread upper surface; this is a typical geomorphic position for "Q II" terraces in the Krygyz Tien Shan. Based onextrapolating the Q III(2) slip rate, the "Q II" terraces are likely close to 100,000 years old.

Oldest of the "Q III" level terraces; remnants in the study area are narrow and poorly preserved. Slip rate extrapolation suggests that the terrace is about 30,000 years old, so should be datable by radiocarbon.

Youngest of the obviously deformed terraces. Radiocarbon dates of land snail shell and charcoal suggest that this terrace was abandoned about6,000 years ago.

6. CONCLUSIONS

A basinward-propagated structure actively deforms the southern margin of Kochkorka basin, indicating that significant shortening occurs within intermontane basins of the Kyrgyz central Tien Shan. A simple structural fault-bend fold model that assumes bedding parallel slip as well as constant bedding length and thickness accurately predicts general patterns of successively deformed Pleistocene strath terraces. The terraces do not appear to be deforming by pure kink-band folding, however, which suggests that growth of fold deformation may not faithfully parallel deformation of the larger structure. Independent estimates of shortening using four surveyed terraces produce similar results. We plan to compare these results to other basin margins in the central Tien Shan, to study the partitioning of strain between intermontane and foreland basins.

Radiocarbon dated land snail shell and charcoal indicate that the youngest deformed terrace is approximately 6,000 years old. Our best estimate for a shortening rate at the southern margin of Kochkorka basin is 1.7 mm/yr, or about 1/10 of the shortening across the central Tien Shan measured by GPS geodesy.

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION III - Shortening, radiocarbon dating, and slip rate

We estimate the amount of shortening for each terrace surface by two methods which are relatively independent. The first method (Estimate A) uses the maximum terrace uplift and dip of the underlying thrust fault ramp to measure fault slip. Maximum terrace uplift is the average height of two surveyed points above the "paleo-river", or where the river was just prior to abandonment of the terrace. This is measured three ways: The maximum uplift estimate assumes the paleo-river profile is the same as the modern Djuanarik River (no lowering). The minimum uplift estimate assumes the paleo-river profile had a substantially flatter gradient and the height of the paleo-river was above the modern Djuanarik River by the same amount as the terraces upstream of the fold are at present. We consider our best estimate of the paleo-river profile to have a similar gradient to the modern Djuanarik River, and that the river profile was higher in the past, as described above. The amount of shortening for each terrace is then calculated by dividing the maximum uplift by the sine of the ramp angle (43˚ for this structure).

The second method (Estimate B) uses the cross-sectional area of uplift and the modeled depth to detachment to estimate the shortening (figure 6). Because the structure is bound at the northern margin by a daylighting thrust, the area of uplift (area above the paleo-river profile) should equal the area of shortening, which is the depth to detachment minus fault slip. This method is independent of the first except that both depend using a 43˚ thrust fault ramp for the reconstruction.

The similarity in the best estimates for the two methods is both striking and fortuitous. The similarity supports our structural interpretation, and is an interesting result given that the terrace profiles are similar to, but diverge from, predicted profiles. Our result is by no stretch of anyone's imagination conclusive, and we plan to test alternative structural solutions in the future.

SLIP RATE

We calculate a slip rate across the structureusing the shortening estimates and radiocarbon datesfor the youngest deformed terrace, Qt III(2). Four samples submitted for radiocarbon analysis yeildedcalibrated ages of 5900-6600 years B.P., and shouldclosely date river downcutting and terrace formation. For the slip rate estimate, we average the results from one shell and one charcoal sample, collected from the same silt deposit at the top of the fluvial gravel.

The maximum, minimum, and best estimate forshortening (Estimate A) divided by the 2s calibrated age range from the radiocarbon samples yeilds a slip rate of 1.7 +1.6/-1.3 mm/year. 1.7 mm/yr is our most confidentrate. Pushing our luck, we estimate ages for the older terraces, by extrapolating the 1.7 mm/yr slip rate (Figure 8).

MAP SYMBOLS

Figure 7.

Recommended