i
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR
HEALTH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
Colleen McHugh, Chairman James D. Dannenbaum Janiece Longoria Wm. Eugene Powell
Committee Meeting: 2/4/2010
Board Meeting: 2/5/2010 Dallas, Texas
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Committee
Meeting Board Meeting
Page
A. CONVENE MEETING OF THE HEALTH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
2:00 p.m. Chairman McHugh
1. U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston: Authorization to ground lease approximately 4.0 acres located on the U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston Victory Lakes campus, League City, Galveston County, Texas, to Gulf Coast Center, a com-munity center established pursuant to Chapter 534 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, for a term of 30 years, plus a period for design, permitting, and construction, for the construction and operation of a transit terminal with surface parking in exchange for the construction of infrastructure that will serve the Victory Lakes campus
2:00 p.m. Action President Callender Ms. Mayne
Action
237
2. U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio: Authorization to name the campus extension in Laredo, Texas, as The University of Texas Health Science Center Regional Campus
2:10 p.m. Action President Henrich Dr. Shine
Action
241
3. U. T. Health Science Center – Houston: Approval of new "doing business as" (dba) name, logo, and brand identity
2:15 p.m. Action President Kaiser
Action
241
4. U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas: Authorization to negotiate and execute an agreement to host the Disney Institute's "The Disney Keys to Quality Service" program event that allows U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas to jointly sponsor the program event as an excep-tion to Regents' Rule 80106 to allow the Disney Institute to retain a portion of revenues, upon review and approval by the U. T. System Office of Health Affairs and the U. T. System Office of General Counsel
2:25 p.m. Action President Podolsky
Action
242
ii
Thursday, February 4, 2010 (continued)
Committee
Meeting Board Meeting
Page
5. U. T. System: Report and recommendations of the U. T. System Revenue Cycle Task Force
2:30 p.m. Report Mr. Black, U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio Mr. Leach, U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Not on Agenda
243
6. U. T. System: Quarterly report on health matters, including the impact of proposed health care legislation on U. T. System institutions and next steps in health information technology for the State of Texas
2:45 p.m. Report Dr. Shine
Not on Agenda
250
B. ADJOURN MEETING OF THE HEALTH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
3:00 p.m.
* * * * *
Friday, February 5, 2010
Committee Meeting Page
C. 7.
CONVENE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HEALTH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE U. T. System: Funding streams for health institutions -- opportunities and challenges
8:30 a.m. Discussion Dr. Shine
250
D. ADJOURN SPECIAL MEETING 10:00 a.m.
237
1. U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston: Authorization to ground lease approx-imately 4.0 acres located on the U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston Victory Lakes campus, League City, Galveston County, Texas, to Gulf Coast Center, a community center established pursuant to Chapter 534 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, for a term of 30 years, plus a period for design, permitting, and construction, for the construction and operation of a transit terminal with surface parking in exchange for the construction of infrastructure that will serve the Victory Lakes campus
RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Business Affairs, the Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, and President Callender that authorization be granted by the U. T. System Board of Regents, on behalf of U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston, to a. ground lease approximately 4.0 acres located on the U. T. Medical
Branch – Galveston Victory Lakes campus, League City, Galveston County, Texas, to Gulf Coast Center (Center), a community center established pursuant to Chapter 534 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, for a term of 30 years, plus a period for design, permitting, and construction, for the construction and operation of a transit terminal with surface parking in exchange for the construction of infrastructure that will serve the Victory Lakes campus; and
b. authorize the Executive Director of Real Estate to execute all documents,
instruments, and other agreements, subject to approval of all such docu-ments as to legal form by the Office of General Counsel, and to take all further actions deemed necessary or advisable to carry out the purpose and intent of the foregoing recommendation.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Center has requested to lease approximately 4.0 acres in the northwest portion of U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston's Victory Lakes campus in League City, Galveston County, Texas, to construct and operate a transit terminal with surface parking. The transit terminal will consist of a bus terminal and surface parking for approximately 450 vehicles, and is planned to provide park and ride bus service to Galveston. The land is currently vacant, but is within walking distance of the UTMB Specialty Care Center currently under construction at the Victory Lakes campus. The transit terminal site was selected to simplify the planned phased development of the campus.
238
The institution proposes to ground lease the property to the Center for a term of 30 years, plus a 36-month period for design, permitting, and construction. The proposed transit terminal, a "park and ride" facility, is expected to improve bus service to the Victory Lakes campus, as well as to the Medical Branch's main campus in Galveston. In consideration for the ground lease, the Center will construct a two-lane road along the north edge of the campus to link Interstate Highway 45 to Walker Street, the primary north-south campus drive extending from the north road to the planned central round-about, and related infrastructure. The institution will pay only the difference in the cost of infrastructure sized for its campus compared with the cost of the infrastructure sized for the transit facility. The roads and infrastructure will serve the transit facility but are also necessary for the development of the Victory Lakes campus; if they are not built by the Center, they would eventually be built by U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston. The insti-tution will also benefit from the enhanced connectivity to its main campus in Galveston that a public transit terminal can provide. The Center will construct the facilities at its own expense, using a combination of grants from the Federal Transit Administration and local transit funds. The Center will operate the park and ride facility at all times and at its own expense and will pay all taxes. The lease will give the institution the right to approve the plans and specifications of the proposed improvements and will limit the use of the property to a transit terminal. The federal grants similarly limit the use of the property. U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston will also reserve the right to relocate the facility to another location on its Victory Lakes campus. The ground lease will also contain provisions in which the tenant, to the extent allowed by the laws and Constitution of the State of Texas, indemnifies the landlord for all matters arising from the tenant's use or occupancy of or activities on the premises. The proposed improvements are depicted on the map on Page 240. The terms and con-ditions of the proposed ground lease are specified in the transaction summary below.
Transaction Summary
Institution: U. T. Medical Branch – Galveston Type of Transaction: Ground lease Tenant: Gulf Coast Center, a community center established pursuant
to Chapter 534 of the Texas Health and Safety Code Total Area: Approximately 4.0 acres Improvements: The ground tenant will construct a transit terminal with
surface parking Location: Northwest portion of Victory Lakes campus, League City,
Galveston County, Texas
239
Appraised Value: $1,590,000 (Kenneth Levenson, MAI, Integra Realty Resources, July 5, 2009)
Lease Term: 30 years plus initial design, permitting, and construction
period not to exceed 36 months Uses: Transit terminal with surface parking Consideration: Construction by Gulf Coast Center of a two-lane road along
the north edge of the Victory Lakes campus and the primary north-south campus drive extending from the north road to the planned central round-about on the Victory Lakes campus, including funding for related infrastructure sized for the transit terminal facility; infrastructure design and construction costs to be borne by the Center are estimated at $1,770,000
240
241
2. U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio: Authorization to name the campus extension in Laredo, Texas, as The University of Texas Health Science Center Regional Campus
RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs and President Henrich that approval be granted to U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio to name its campus extension in Laredo, Texas, as The University of Texas Health Science Center Regional Campus.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio wishes to name its campus extension in Laredo, Texas, as The University of Texas Health Science Center Regional Campus. The new name of the Laredo campus is planned to elevate the perceived prominence of the campus, to more accurately describe the regional focus of the campus, and to more closely align the name of the Laredo campus with the name of the campus in Harlingen (Regional Academic Health Center). If the name is approved, the signage at the Laredo campus will include use of the U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio logo. 3. U. T. Health Science Center – Houston: Approval of new "doing business
as" (dba) name, logo, and brand identity
RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, the Vice Chancellor for External Relations, and President Kaiser that the U. T. System Board of Regents approve the new "doing business as" (dba) name, logo, and brand identity for U. T. Health Science Center – Houston.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION U. T. Health Science Center – Houston has recently undertaken a significant review of its current brand identity in an effort to increase public awareness and enhance the reputation of the University. An experienced branding/marketing agency was retained and conducted numerous interviews and branding sessions with internal and external stakeholders associated with the institution. The research results provided valuable insights about the University's strengths, culture, and perceptions, and demonstrated
242
clearly that the name of the institution -- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston -- is problematic. Results of surveys showed that the name is difficult for people to remember, is misunderstood, and is shortened in widely inconsistent ways within the institution and by people in the community and the media. U. T. Health Science Center – Houston proposes a new identity system that would be used prominently and consistently in all forms of communication representing the University -- publications, letterhead, signage, business cards, web, advertising, and more, in an effort to create a uniform communication standard and to enhance a better public understanding of the institution's role as a comprehensive health science university. 4. U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas: Authorization to negotiate and
execute an agreement to host the Disney Institute's "The Disney Keys to Quality Service" program event that allows U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas to jointly sponsor the program event as an exception to Regents' Rules and Regulations, Rule 80106 to allow the Disney Institute to retain a portion of revenues, upon review and approval by the U. T. System Office of Health Affairs and the U. T. System Office of General Counsel
RECOMMENDATION The Chancellor concurs in the recommendation of the Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, the Vice Chancellor and General Counsel, and President Podolsky that the U. T. System Board of Regents authorize an exception to the Regents' Rules and Regulations, Rule 80106, Section 2.3, regarding use of Special Use Facilities to allow U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas to negotiate and execute an agreement for joint sponsorship of the Disney Institute's "The Disney Keys to Quality Service" program event, with the Disney Institute retaining a portion of receipts from the program event. The agreement will be subject to review and approval by the U. T. System Office of Health Affairs and the U. T. System Office of General Counsel.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Disney Institute opened in 1986 and, in partnership with local health care institutions, has developed a series of training programs that provide the health care institutions with opportunities to learn additional methods to achieve excellence in medical and customer services. U. T. Southwestern Medical Center – Dallas wishes to jointly sponsor the Disney Institute's program "The Disney Keys to Quality Service," with the primary purpose of advancing best customer service practices in health care. Aligning with the Disney Institute in the sponsorship of its training sessions in the Dallas market will highlight U. T. Southwestern as a leader in customer service for patients and clinical excellence.
243
Under the proposed agreement, U. T. Southwestern will provide facilities, equipment, and personnel, and the institution will receive private training seminars, discounted event tickets, free tickets, educational opportunities, and opportunities for increased market exposure. It is expected that receipts from the program event will exceed the actual cost to U. T. Southwestern to jointly sponsor the event. The Disney Institute will share a portion of the event's revenue with U. T. Southwestern, and the institution requests authorization of an exception to Section 2.3 of Regents' Rule 80106 so that the Disney Institute is not required to remit its total profit from the event to the institution. The final agreement will be subject to the approval of the U. T. System Office of Health Affairs and the U. T. System Office of General Counsel. 5. U. T. System: Report and recommendations of the U. T. System Revenue
Cycle Task Force
REPORT In April 2009, the Executive Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs appointed a Revenue Cycle Task Force (Task Force) to engage in a comprehensive review of the revenue cycle operations at the U. T. System health institutions. Mr. Michael E. Black, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer at U. T. Health Science Center – San Antonio, and Mr. Leon J. Leach, Executive Vice President at U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, are co-chairs of the Task Force. They will discuss their observations from visits of the Task Force to the six health institution campuses and will present the Task Force's recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the revenue cycle operations of the hospitals and physician practice plans, using a PowerPoint presentation on Pages 244 - 249.
U. T
. Sys
tem
Rev
enue
Cyc
le T
ask
Forc
e –
Rep
ort a
nd R
ecom
men
datio
nsM
icha
el E
. Bla
ckSe
nior
Exe
cutiv
e Vi
ce P
resi
dent
and
Chi
ef O
pera
ting
Offi
cer
U. T
. Hea
lth S
cien
ce C
ente
r –Sa
n A
nton
io
Leon
J. L
each
Exec
utiv
e Vi
ce P
resi
dent
, Bus
ines
s &
Reg
ulat
ory
Affa
irs
U. T
. M. D
. And
erso
n C
ance
r Cen
ter
U. T
. Sys
tem
Boa
rd o
f Reg
ents
’ Mee
ting
Hea
lth A
ffairs
Com
mitt
eeF
b20
10Fe
brua
ry 2
010
244
Exec
utiv
eSu
mm
ary
Exec
utiv
e Su
mm
ary
Bac
kgro
und
InA
pril
2009
the
Exe
cutiv
eV
ice
Cha
ncel
lorf
orH
ealth
Affa
irsau
thor
ized
the
crea
tion
ofa
In A
pril
2009
, the
Exe
cutiv
e V
ice
Cha
ncel
lor f
or H
ealth
Affa
irs a
utho
rized
the
crea
tion
of a
R
even
ue C
ycle
Tas
k Fo
rce
(Tas
k Fo
rce)
to e
ngag
e in
a c
ompr
ehen
sive
revi
ew o
f the
re
venu
e cy
cle
oper
atio
ns a
cros
s th
e U
. T. S
yste
m h
ealth
inst
itutio
ns.
Cha
rge
Cha
rge
1. R
evie
w U
. T. S
yste
m p
olic
ies
2. C
ondu
ct c
ampu
s vi
sits
3. Id
entif
y “b
est p
ract
ices
”4
Iden
tify
stra
tegi
esto
incr
ease
effe
ctiv
enes
sef
ficie
ncy
and
prod
uctiv
ityof
oper
atio
ns4.
Iden
tify
stra
tegi
es to
incr
ease
effe
ctiv
enes
s, e
ffici
ency
, and
pro
duct
ivity
of o
pera
tions
Def
initi
on o
f Rev
enue
Cyc
le O
pera
tions
Act
iviti
es a
nd in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s de
sign
ed to
effi
cien
tly a
nd e
ffect
ivel
y ac
hiev
e th
e pr
oces
sing
ofre
venu
eso
urce
sfo
rthe
phys
icia
npr
actic
epl
ans
and
hosp
itals
Exa
mpl
es:
proc
essi
ng o
f rev
enue
sou
rces
for t
he p
hysi
cian
pra
ctic
e pl
ans
and
hosp
itals
. Exa
mpl
es:
patie
nt re
gist
ratio
n an
d sc
hedu
ling,
insu
ranc
e ve
rific
atio
n, fi
nanc
ial s
cree
ning
and
co
unse
ling,
cla
ims
proc
essi
ng, a
nd a
ccou
nts
rece
ivab
le m
anag
emen
t.
245
Cre
atin
g th
e Sy
stem
wid
e R
even
ue C
ycle
Com
mitt
ee
Issu
e
The
U. T
. Sys
tem
hea
lth
inst
itutio
nsha
vea
num
bero
f
Rec
omm
enda
tions
Cre
ate
a S
yste
mw
ide
Rev
enue
Cyc
le C
omm
ittee
(C
omm
ittee
):in
stitu
tions
hav
e a
num
ber o
f “b
est p
ract
ices
” and
“exp
erts
;” ho
wev
er, t
here
is li
ttle
awar
enes
s an
d co
ordi
natio
n am
ong
the
cam
puse
s
(Com
mitt
ee):
•D
isse
min
ate
“bes
t pra
ctic
es”
•E
mpo
wer
mem
bers
for c
ampu
s ac
tion
•Le
vera
ge “e
xper
ts” a
s ad
viso
ry a
nd te
mpo
rary
ca
mpu
ses.
tech
nica
l con
sulta
nts
•N
etw
ork
reve
nue
cycl
e op
erat
ions
and
in
form
atio
n te
chno
logy
per
sonn
el
Gov
erna
nce
Obs
erva
tion
The
Task
For
ce e
ndor
ses
the
hybr
id o
rgan
izat
iona
l mod
el w
ith c
entra
l ove
rsig
ht o
f th
e de
cent
raliz
ed b
usin
ess
cent
ers.
3
246
Aut
omat
ing
Rev
enue
Cyc
le O
pera
tions
Issu
eS
ome
U. T
. Sys
tem
hea
lth
itit
tih
lt
it
l
Rec
omm
enda
tions
Offi
ce o
f Hea
lth A
ffairs
(OH
A) w
ill de
velo
p an
d d
ii
ttit
il
fth
inst
itutio
ns h
ave
elec
troni
c to
ols
that
enh
ance
reve
nue
cycl
e pr
oces
ses
beyo
nd th
e in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s fo
r med
ical
bi
llid
lt
idi
l
adm
inis
ter a
com
petit
ive
loan
pro
gram
for t
he
“see
d m
oney
” req
uire
d to
impl
emen
t inn
ovat
ive
solu
tions
. C
omm
ittee
will
inve
ntor
y S
yste
mw
ide
tech
nolo
gy
billin
g an
d el
ectro
nic
med
ical
re
cord
s. I
nstit
utio
ns a
re
chal
leng
ed w
ith s
ecur
ing
fund
ing
for t
hese
bus
ines
s ap
plic
atio
ns.
solu
tions
impl
emen
ted
or p
lann
ed.
Com
mitt
ee w
ill ex
plor
e te
chno
logy
sol
utio
ns fo
r in
sura
nce
verif
icat
ion
and
adva
nced
ben
efic
iary
no
tices
.Th
e Ta
sk F
orce
end
orse
s tra
nspa
renc
y at
eac
h ca
mpu
s by
pub
lishi
ng m
eani
ngfu
l, ea
sy-to
-un
ders
tand
reve
nue
cycl
e op
erat
iona
l rep
orts
.
4
247
Sim
plify
ing
Adm
inis
trat
ive
Proc
esse
sIs
sue
U. T
. Sys
tem
hea
lth in
stitu
tions
ar
e in
unda
ted
with
pap
erw
ork,
l
ihd
ii
i/
Rec
omm
enda
tions
OH
A w
ill pu
rsue
a le
gisl
ativ
e st
rate
gy to
alle
viat
e ad
min
istra
tive
burd
en o
f sm
all b
alan
ces
(deb
its a
nd
di)
dl
lli
fll
stru
ggle
with
adm
inis
trativ
e/
regu
lato
ry is
sues
, and
/or r
ecei
ve
inco
nsis
tent
and
inco
mpl
ete
patie
nt in
form
atio
n.
cre d
its) a
nd c
onsu
lt at
torn
eys
on le
galit
y of
sm
all
bala
nce
writ
e-of
fs.
OH
A w
ill co
ordi
nate
act
iviti
es w
ith H
ealth
and
Hum
an
Ser
vice
s C
omm
issi
on o
n ne
w p
rogr
ams
and
gene
ric
deni
al c
ode.
Com
mitt
ee w
ill fa
cilit
ate
anal
ysis
of i
ssui
ng a
sin
gle
bill
for p
atie
nts
at h
ospi
tal-b
ased
inst
itutio
ns.
Cre
ate
high
-leve
law
aren
ess
with
affil
iate
dho
spita
lC
reat
e hi
ghle
vel a
war
enes
s w
ith a
ffilia
ted
hosp
ital
partn
ers
on c
ritic
ality
of t
rans
mitt
ed in
form
atio
n.
5
248
Con
clus
ion
Con
clus
ion
The
stre
ngth
, inn
ovat
ion,
and
cre
ativ
ity o
f the
U. T
. Sys
tem
resi
de in
the
tale
nted
and
de
dica
ted
pers
onne
l acr
oss
the
Syst
em.
The
Task
For
ce b
elie
ves
crea
ting
a Sy
stem
wid
e R
even
ue C
ycle
Com
mitt
ee, a
utom
atin
g th
e re
venu
e cy
cle
oper
atio
ns, a
nd s
impl
ifyin
g ad
min
istr
ativ
e pr
oces
ses
will
pro
duce
m
ore
effic
ient
and
effe
ctiv
e re
sults
acr
oss
the
U. T
. Sys
tem
hea
lth in
stitu
tions
. Crit
ical
su
cces
s fa
ctor
s in
clud
e le
vera
ging
the
“U. T
. Sys
tem
exp
erts
” an
d es
tabl
ishi
ng a
loan
pr
ogra
m to
faci
litat
e th
e ad
optio
n of
the
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
bes
t pra
ctic
es c
onta
ined
in
this
repo
rt.
6
249
250
6. U. T. System: Quarterly report on health matters, including the impact of proposed health care legislation on U. T. System institutions and next steps in health information technology for the State of Texas
REPORT Executive Vice Chancellor Shine will report on health matters of interest to the U. T. System, including the impact of proposed health care legislation on U. T. System institutions and next steps in health information technology for the State of Texas. This is a quarterly update to the Health Affairs Committee of the U. T. System Board of Regents.
* * * * *
Friday, February 5, 2010 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HEALTH AFFAIRS COMMITTEE 7. U. T. System: Funding streams for health institutions -- opportunities and
challenges
DISCUSSION Executive Vice Chancellor Shine will lead a discussion related to funding streams for health institutions using the charts set forth on Pages 251 - 266.
UT Health‐Related InstitutionsActivities & Funds
Patient Care$3,452.0 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$75.2 M
Research$1,293.8 M
Philanthropy$159.4 M
$562.4 M
$ , $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$489.8 M
Income$207.1 M
Auxiliary$80.2 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
251
UT Health‐Related InstitutionsActivities & Funds
1 Patient Care: Represents hospital and physician clinical revenue.
2 State Appropriations: General Revenue, including direct hospital support, patient based formula funding and employee benefits, but not I&O, Infrastructure, Research & GME formulas.
3 Educational Income: Includes General Revenue from I&O Infrastructure3 Educational Income: Includes General Revenue from I&O, Infrastructure, Research & GME formulas and revenue from “Net Sales and Services of Educational Activities" in FY2007 Actual Budget data.
4 Research: Based on report to THECB, not the "Sponsored Programs" revenue or the "Research Operating Expenses" in the FY2007 Actual Budget dataor the "Research Operating Expenses" in the FY2007 Actual Budget data.
5 Philanthropy: Represents "Gifts in Support of Operations" in FY2007 Actual Budget data.
6 Investment Income: Represents “Net Investment Income” in FY2007 Actual pBudget data.
7 Auxiliary: Represents “Net Auxiliary Enterprises” in FY2007 Actual Budget data.
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
252
UT SouthwesternActivities & Funds
Patient Care$693.0 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$13.4 M
Research$341.1 M
Philanthropy$48.0 M
$62.2 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$93.2 M
Income$66.1 M
Auxiliary$17.4 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
253
UT Medical Branch at GalvestonActivities & Funds
Patient Care$436.3 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$14.9 M
Research$156.1 M
Philanthropy$6.3 M
$230.9 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$78.1 M
Income$35.1 M
Auxiliary$9.2 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
254
UT HSC HoustonActivities & Funds
Patient Care$196.0 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$21.7 M
Research$191.7 M
Philanthropy$10.7 M
$46.4 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$139.1 M
Income$19.4 M
Auxiliary$24.0 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
255
UT HSC San AntonioActivities & Funds
Patient Care$122.0 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$24.7 M
Research$146.3 M
Philanthropy$23.3 M
$57.0 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$136.9 M
Income$27.8 M
Auxiliary$4.1 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
256
UT MD AndersonActivities & Funds
Patient Care$1,951.9 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$0.6 M
Research$444.9 M
Philanthropy$70.5 M
$131.2 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$31.1 M
Income$55.0 M
Auxiliary$25.3 M
FY 2007 Data Feb. 2010 Health Affairs
257
UT HSC TylerActivities & Funds
Patient Care$52.8 M
State Appropriations(Non‐Formula)
$
Tuition & Fees$0.0 M
Research$13.6 M
Philanthropy$0.6 M
$34.7 M
$ $
Educational InvestmentIIncome
$4.1 M
Income$3.6 M
Auxiliary$0.2 M
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
258
UT HEALTH‐RELATED INSTITUTIONSClinical Enterprise
Medicaid10%
Commercial Insurance
58%
Local GovtPrograms
4%
Medicare23%
Self Pay5%
Patient Care
$3,452 MFaculty
Practice Plans$ 1,071 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$283 M
ClinicalEffectivenessOutcomes/
$ ,
*State Appropriations
$267 M
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, p pp ( , , ); g ( ,MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
TDCJ Correctional Managed Health Care revenue of $300 M is not included above.
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
259
UT HEALTH‐RELATED INSTITUTIONS
Patient Care includes UT hospital and practice plan net patient revenue,
Clinical Enterprise
Notes
patient care revenue paid to practice plans by county/affiliate hospitals, physician UPL for FY 2007 services, mental health community hospital revenue. It excludes physician UPL for prior years’ services.
The revenue mix per category is based on the patient’s primary payer and includes an apportionment of county/affiliate hospital general patient careincludes an apportionment of county/affiliate hospital general patient care revenue where applicable.
Local government programs reflect contractual relationships between UT Southwestern and Parkland Health & Hospital System, UT HSC Houston and Harris County Hospital District, and UT HSC San Antonio and Bexar County’sHarris County Hospital District, and UT HSC San Antonio and Bexar County s University Health System for care by UT physicians at hospital district facilities for patients who have no other primary payer and qualify for the programs. For UT HSC Houston, local government programs also include revenue at the Harris County Psychiatric Center for those patients whose care is primarily funded by local and state funds for mental health community hospitals.
Self Pay includes revenues where the patient or the patient’s family is the primary payer for care. This includes patients who are uninsured, underinsured, or receiving noncovered, elective treatment as well as international patientsinternational patients.
The amount in the box titled “Education Undergraduate/GME Formulas” is FY 2007 state general revenue from the Instruction & Operations (I&O) formula and the GME formula.
260
UT Southwestern Clinical Enterprise
Medicaid13%
Commercial Insurance
49%
Local GovtPrograms
10%
Medicare23%
Self Pay5%
Patient Care
$693 MFaculty
Practice Plans$391 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$60 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$0
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT,Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
261
UT Medical Branch at GalvestonClinical Enterprise
Medicaid30%
Commercial Insurance
31%
Local GovtPrograms
0%
Medicare31%
Self Pay8%
Patient Care
$436 MFaculty
Practice Plans$115 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$56 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$138 M
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, p pp ( ) g (MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
TDCJ Correctional Managed Health Care revenue of $300 M is not included above.
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
262
UT HSC HoustonClinical Enterprise
Medicaid23%
Commercial Insurance
33%
Local GovtPrograms
21%
Medicare15%
Self Pay8%
Patient Care
$196 MFaculty
Practice Plans$170 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$86 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$0
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT,Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
263
UT HSC San AntonioClinical Enterprise
Medicaid21%
Commercial Insurance
21%
Local GovtPrograms
32%
Medicare23%
Self Pay3%
Patient Care
$122 MFaculty
Practice Plans$122 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$78 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$0
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT,Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
264
UT MD AndersonClinical Enterprise
Medicaid2%
Commercial Insurance
72%
Local GovtPrograms
0%
Medicare21%
Self Pay5%
Patient Care
$1,952 MFaculty
Practice Plans$261 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$2 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$105 M
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT,Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
265
UT HSC TylerClinical Enterprise
Medicaid15%
Commercial Insurance
31%
Local GovtPrograms
0%
Medicare49%
Self Pay5%
Patient Care $53 M
FacultyPractice Plans
$11 M
EducationUndergraduate/GME
Formulas$0.05 M
ClinicalEffectivenessO t /
$
*State Appropriations
$24 M
ResearchOutcomes/
Safety
Basic Research
*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB MDACC HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT*Direct Hospital Support (UTMB, MDACC, HSCT); Patient Based Formula Funding (HSCT, MDACC) ; Indigent Care Fund (UTMB)
FY 2007 Data Feb 2010 Health Affairs
266