+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Table of Contents - NASBA · Table of Contents Introduction ... In addition to the four primary...

Table of Contents - NASBA · Table of Contents Introduction ... In addition to the four primary...

Date post: 26-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: haque
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
338
Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................1 Section Description....................................................................................6 Candidate Performance Overview.......................................................12 Program Accreditation: Overall and First-Time.....................................16 Regional Accreditation...........................................................................28 International Institutions...........................................................................52 Jurisdiction Institution Performance: Overall and First-Time................56 Institution Rankings.................................................................................164 Appendix A Appendix A-1: Institution Attended - All Testing Events..............................172 Appendix A-2: Advanced Degree - All TestingEvents................................202 Appendix A-3: Bachelor's Degree - All Testing Events................................214 Appendix B Appendix B-1: Institution Attended - FT Testing Events................................238 Appendix B-2: Advanced Degree - FT Testing Events.................................274 Appendix B-3: Bachelor's Degree - FT Testing Events..................................276 Appendix C Appendix C-1: Institution Attended - FT Within One Year Testing Events..298 Appendix C-2: Advanced Degree - FT Within One Year Testing Events...316 Appendix C-3: Bachelor's Degree - FT Within One Year Testing Events....322 Glossary...................................................................................................334
Transcript
  • Table of Contents

    Introduction.................................................................................................1

    Section Description....................................................................................6

    Candidate Performance Overview.......................................................12

    Program Accreditation: Overall and First-Time.....................................16

    Regional Accreditation...........................................................................28

    International Institutions...........................................................................52

    Jurisdiction Institution Performance: Overall and First-Time................56

    Institution Rankings.................................................................................164

    Appendix AAppendix A-1: Institution Attended - All Testing Events..............................172Appendix A-2: Advanced Degree - All TestingEvents................................202Appendix A-3: Bachelor's Degree - All Testing Events................................214

    Appendix BAppendix B-1: Institution Attended - FT Testing Events................................238Appendix B-2: Advanced Degree - FT Testing Events.................................274Appendix B-3: Bachelor's Degree - FT Testing Events..................................276

    Appendix CAppendix C-1: Institution Attended - FT Within One Year Testing Events..298 Appendix C-2: Advanced Degree - FT Within One Year Testing Events...316Appendix C-3: Bachelor's Degree - FT Within One Year Testing Events....322

    Glossary...................................................................................................334

  • INTRODUCTION

    The National Association of State Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) began gathering data on CPA

    examination candidates in 1982 and has published reports on performance and selected characteristics

    since 1985. This edition of the book covers candidate performance for the Uniform CPA Examination

    for all four testing windows in the calendar year 2014. NASBA offers these reports through the

    voluntary participation of candidates and their individual Boards of Accountancy, which provide data,

    and the cooperation of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), which prepares

    and scores the Examination for the 55 U.S. jurisdictions.

    BACKGROUND DATA

    The background data is obtained directly from State Boards of Accountancy, when they submit

    information about eligible candidates to NASBAs Gateway System. This system is a Web Interface

    which provides state boards a means to enter, review, and manage candidate information. The

    process of entering candidate information using the Web Interface results in the eventual scheduling

    of an Examination by the candidate. Candidate information is transmitted through the Gateway

    System and stored in the National Candidate Database (NCD) where all CPA candidate information and

    Examination history data is maintained.

    NOTE ABOUT THIS EDITION

    The users of this and other reports related to university performance on the CPA examination need to

    be aware of several factors affecting its usability as a comparative tool across institutions.

    1. Many/most students are classified as bachelors students though they are in graduate

    programs. For example, if a student applies to take the CPA exam while in a Masters program,

    the student may list only a bachelors degree for completed degrees. Consequently, the

    Advanced degree results represent a subset of students with Advanced degrees.

    2. Because of 1, the Institution results may be the best indication of university performance

    3. Custom analysis using university-provided graduation lists yield the most accurate information

    about program performance.

    4. In the first-time within one year results, the degree date was missing for XX percent of the

    candidates.

    5. Because of space considerations, we provide summary pass rate information for individual

    schools. However, school and program reports with content area results (similar to the Overall

    Performance report on pages 13 and 14) are available to universities as part of a custom

    analysis. Information on custom analysis and pricing can be found at nasbareport.com.

    6. The school results should be interpreted cautiously because school missions and student

    demographics differ.

    1

  • WHATS NEW WITH THE REPORTING

    In 2016 the data will be presented in two books. The Jurisdiction Edition, designed specifically with the State Boards in mind, will provide a broad view of the CPA Exam trends from around the world. The University Edition focuses on university and accreditation reports, including international, regional, national and state. University rankings based upon examination data will also be a prominent feature in this edition.

    Content Area Performance In addition to the four primary sections (AUD, BEC, FAR, REG), the new publication will include performance metrics by cohort for each of the 23 content areas and four skills areas. The content area performance metric represents the percentage of students who received a comparable or stronger score for that area.

    Cohort Tracking All candidates who begin the examination process in the same calendar year are members of the cohort. Presenting the data in this way allows for a more accurate analysis of trends in the accounting pipeline.

    Pipeline Reporting This section of the reporting provides in-depth analysis of a candidates path through the examination process, whether they pass all four parts or choose to drop out. In 2015 there were 26,110 candidates who passed their 4th part of the exam, 19,733 candidates dropped out of the exam, and 61,804 remained active in the examination process at the end of calendar year.

    DEMOGRAPHICS

    The reader should note that demographic data is not reported completely for all jurisdictions. This gap

    in data is often due to the fact that the reported information may not be critical to a given

    jurisdictions application process and thus not collected. NASBA will continue to work with several of

    the jurisdictions to close many of the data collection gaps.

    SECTION DESCRIPTIONS

    In an effort to present the data in a clear-cut manner, section descriptions for each individual

    component of the report have been built into this edition. Please do not hesitate to contact us at

    [email protected] with additional questions.

    FEEDBACK

    The changes and improvements in this book are a direct result of the feedback received from the many

    end users of this product. Although this edition has made significant strides over previous editions, we

    acknowledge that there is additional room for improvement. To get there, we need your feedback,

    both positive and negative. Please send any questions, comments and (most importantly) suggestions

    to [email protected].

    2

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • GENERAL DISCLAIMERS / LIMITED LIABILITY

    Notwithstanding any language to the contrary, nothing contained herein constitutes nor is intended to

    constitute a promise of any kind. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure accurate and up-to-date

    information in this Jurisdiction Performance Book, the data contained herein is for informational

    purposes only and is not represented to be error free. The National Association of State Boards of

    Accountancy (NASBA) does not warrant that the information and materials in this handbook are

    adequate, accurate, current or complete, and, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws,

    expressly disclaims liability for any errors or omissions in the information and materials. No warranty

    of any kind, implied, express or statutory, including fitness for a particular purpose, is given in

    conjunction with the information and materials contained within the Jurisdiction Performance Book. In

    no event will NASBA or its directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, or volunteers be

    liable for any damage to you or any other party for any losses or damage including, without limitation,

    incidental, exemplary or consequential damage arising from the use or inability to use the data

    contained within the Jurisdiction Performance Book.

    NOTE ABOUT CONTRIBUTING EDITORS

    Greg Gaynor, PhD, CPA, is an assistant professor of accounting at the University of Baltimore. He

    earned a BA in Economics at Dartmouth College and a PhD in Accounting at Florida State University.

    Consistent with his prior experience in the securities industry, Professor Gaynors research interests

    include the capital markets and financial accounting as well as the CPA examination and licensure

    process. The University of Baltimore is committed to student success in the field of accounting and

    offers the following degrees: B.S.B.A. in Accounting, M.S. in Accounting and Business Advisory Services,

    M.S. in Taxation, and Graduate Certificates in Accounting Fundamentals and Forensic Accounting.Professor Gaynor and the University of Baltimore wish to thank NASBA for generously supporting

    research concerning the CPA exam. By supplying data and analysis regarding candidate performance, NASBA helps both schools and the accounting profession by assisting in the development of successful accounting graduates and future CPAs.

    Mark M. Ulrich, CPA teaches principles of financial and managerial accounting and serves as the

    Director of the Center for Accounting Research and Technology for the Peter J. Tobin College ofBusiness

    at St. Johns University. His current research includes analyzing CPA exam pass rate data and accounting

    education pedagogy. Professor Ulrich has three years of public accounting experience, and most

    recently served as the Director of Budgets and Compliance for the Tobin College of Business.

    Prior to joining St. Johns University, he was employed as a senior audit associate for KPMG.

    Professor Ulrich also serves on the state-wide Board of Directors of the New York State Society of

    Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA), and is a past president of the Queens/Brooklyn Chapter of the

    NYSSCPA.

    3

  • The Department of Accounting and Taxation at the Peter J. Tobin College of Business, St. Johns

    University offers undergraduate and graduate degrees in accounting, taxation, and enterprise risk

    management. St. Johns is dedicated to student success on the CPA exam and students are encouraged

    to finish the exam prior to graduating from the masters program.

    St. Johns has benefitted greatly from the excellent work of NASBA, especially through the custom pass

    rate reports, which allow a university to look at pass rates in much greater detail than what is published

    in the candidate performance books. St. Johns has also participated in data collaboration sessions with

    NASBA and other universities and hosted a data collaboration session as its Manhattan campus in July

    2014. St. Johns and NASBA, along with Notre Dame University and the AACSB, also participated in a

    joint presentation regarding CPA exam data and using pass rate results to support assurance of learning

    for accreditation purposes at the AACSB annual accreditation conference in

    September 2014.

    H. Fred Mittelstaedt, PhD, CPA, Deloitte Foundation Professor of Accountancy, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame; BS 1979, MS 1982, Illinois State University; Ph.D. 1987, University of Illinois

    Fred Mittelstaedt joined the University of Notre Dame faculty in 1992. He has served as the

    Department of Accountancy chairman since 2007. Prior to coming to Notre Dame, he held a faculty

    appointment at Arizona State University.

    Professor Mittelstaedt has taught financial reporting courses to undergraduates, masters in

    accountancy students, MBAs, and Executive MBAs. While at Notre Dame, he has received the Kaneb

    Undergraduate Teaching Award and the Arnie Ludwig Executive MBA Outstanding Teacher Award. He is

    a coauthor on Financial Reporting & Analysis (6th Edition), a textbook used in graduate and

    undergraduate courses at numerous universities.

    His research focuses on financial reporting and retirement benefit issues and has been published in the

    Journal of Accounting and Economics, The Accounting Review, Review of Accounting Studies, and

    several other accounting and finance journals. He is a reviewer for numerous academic journals, and he

    has served on the Editorial Advisory and Review Board for The Accounting Review. In addition, he has

    testified on retiree health benefit issues before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on

    Education and the Workforce.

    Professor Mittelstaedt is a past president of the Federation of Schools of Accountancy and currently

    serves on the AACSB Accounting Accreditation Committee. He is a member of the American Accounting

    Association and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Prior to joining academia, he

    was an auditor with Price Waterhouse & Co. and received an Elijah Watt Sells Award for exceptional

    performance on the Uniform CPA Exam.

    4

  • 5

  • Section Description

    This section contains in-depth descriptions of how to read and understand the data in this publication.

    6

  • OverallThis poron of the report provides the highest level overview of Examinaon volume and performance. In 2014, a total of 91,380 unique candidates passed 49.5% of the 234,440 secon aempts with an average score of 71.9. These candidates had an average age of 29.0 years at the me of Examinaon.

    Exam Type A candidates first attempt at a given section (FT) and, if needed, subsequent attempts in that same section (RE) are reported in the Exam Type area of the report. Some candidates sit for both FT and RE sections in a given Examination year. In 2014 a total of 67,849 unique candidates passed 55.0% of the 136,279 FT sections attempts with an average score of 72.6. Typically around 60% of the sections attempted in a given year are FT.

    EExam SectionThe four distinct sections of the CPA Examination (AUD, BEC, FAR, REG) are each reported separately in this part of the report. Candidates attempted AUD more frequently than any other section (62,486 attempts) which resulted in the lowest pass-rate of the four sections (46.4%). BEC is often the last section attempted, which yields a lower total number of attempts and a higher average pass-rate.

    Cohort Size TrendA A cohort is defined as the group of unique candidates who began the Examination process in a calendar year. The 2014 cohort size was 41,066 candidates, which represents a 1,688 candidate (3.9%) decline from 2013. The cohort size increase seen in 2010 and the subsequent drop in 2011 is related largely to the CPA Exam update to the next iteration of computer based testing (CBTe).

    Secon Descripon7

  • Secon Descripon

    Gender

    A candidates gender is generally derived from informaon gathered during the applicaon process.

    The gender mix has been roughly 50% male and 50% female since 2011. Gender informaon was

    available for 95.5% of candidates sing for the exam in 2014. *Note that candidate counts for gender do not add up to the overall number because those who do not report a gender are not included in this secon.

    RResidenceDuring the applicaon process, each candidate indicates a country of residence. Tesng performance and paerns for internaonal residents varies notably from those of U.S. residents. In 2014, a total of 8,589 candidates entered an internaonal address during the Examinaon applicaon process, represenng 9.4% of all testers. Internaonal residents passed 39.7% of secons aempted while their domesc counterparts passed 50.6%.

    Cohort YearThis poron of the report shows performance of various cohorts on Examinaon secons aempted during the current calendar year. The other cohort year collecvely represents the 2004 through 2011 cohorts. In 2014 a total of 9,413 candidates who began in the 2012 cohort year sat for the examinaon and achieved a 42.1% secon pass rate.

    Age at Time of ExaminaonThis secon This secon aempts to show both the size and performance of various age groups on the CPA Examinaon. While the mean age in 2014 was 29 years, the median age was 26 years. As in previous Examinaon years, performance on the Examinaon declined with age (and me since graduaon) with the largest drop occurring aer the 22-23 year age group.

    8

  • Acvity & Lost CreditThe candidate acvity pipeline is broken down into five general areas of earned credits: Pass 4, Acve, Inacve, Drop, and Lost Credit. These categories are defined as follows:

    o Pass 4: The count of candidates in each defined cohort group who passed their 4th secon in the reported year. o Acve: The count of candidates in each defined cohort group who sat for at least one secon in the last 9 months of the reported year. o Inacve: The count of candidates in each defined cohort group who last sat for a secon between 9 and 18 months prior to the end of the reported year. 1,687 candidates from the 2014 cohort year are reported as inacve, meaning they sat for their first and last secon during the first tesng window of 2014 but failed to pass all 4 secons or aempt another secon during the remaining 3 tesng windows. While some of the inacve candidates may reappear as acve candidates in following years, the total count is a strong leading indicator of drops in the following calendar year. o Drop: The count of candidates in each defined cohort group who are considered to have dropped from the Examinaon process. While this is not an absolute definion, the general assumpon is that once 18 months has passed and all earned credits have expired, most candidates will not restart the Examinaon process. In the 2014 calendar year 7,668 candidates from the 2012 cohort year are reported as having dropped from the Examinaon process. o Lost Credit: Any credits that were earned outside of a Jurisdicons required meline (typi (typically 18 months or 6 tesng windows) before passing the fourth secon will be lost. This metric counts the total number of these lost credits in the given tesng window.

    Secon Descripon9

  • AemptedThis aThis area looks at performance based on me since the first secon that a candidates aempts. The idea behind this view is to look at how candidates perform farther into the tesng process. Any secons aempted aer 6 months and before 12 months of the given candidates first aempted secon will be aggregated in the

  • Content and Skill AreaThe The content and skills secon provides a more granular look at the 23 content areas, as well as the simulaon and wring porons, of CPA Examinaon performance. The percentages reported here represent the percentage of test takers who received a Comparable or Stronger (C/S) on their score report. For an in-depth explanaon of the C/S measurement, please visit the AICPAs webpage on Psychometrics and Scoring. The darker blue colors represent the content area and cohorts with the highest percentage of C/S while the darker red colors represent the lowest. In 2014, the highest performing area was Informaon Systems where 69.2% of the cohort received a comparable or ststronger score. The lowest performance was 38.0% C/S in Financial Statement Accounts for the pre-2012 cohorts.

    Secon Descripon11

  • 2014 Candidate Performance Overview

    This section contains summary data related to the overall 2014 Examination year.

    12

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    67,849 47,993 49,952 45,398 49,206 46,445

    136,279 98,161 62,486 53,796 60,197 57,961

    55.0% 41.9% 46.4% 55.5% 47.6% 49.4%

    72.6 70.8 72.4 73.8 70.1 71.3

    28.0 30.5 28.9 29.3 29.0 28.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    67,849 - 34,531 33,273 35,657 32,818

    136,279 - 34,531 33,273 35,657 32,818

    55.0% - 49.8% 65.1% 52.5% 53.1%

    72.6 - 72.7 75.6 70.6 71.7

    28.0 - 27.9 27.9 28.0 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 15

  • Program Accreditation: Overall and First-Time

    This section contains summary performance by accreditation: AACSB, AACSB-A, ACBSP, and IACBE.

    16

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    16,858 12,186 12,463 11,345 12,200 11,815

    33,527 24,966 15,537 13,301 14,997 14,658

    55.1% 42.1% 46.5% 56.4% 46.9% 49.2%

    72.8 70.9 72.8 74.0 70.0 71.5

    27.3 29.3 28.0 28.4 28.1 28.1

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    16,858 - 8,454 8,164 8,669 8,240

    33,527 - 8,454 8,164 8,669 8,240

    55.1% - 49.5% 66.4% 51.6% 53.1%

    72.8 - 73.0 76.0 70.5 72.0

    27.3 - 27.2 27.2 27.3 27.3

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    22,718 15,485 17,316 15,675 17,006 16,454

    49,220 31,050 21,382 17,930 20,692 20,266

    63.3% 45.5% 53.0% 65.2% 53.6% 55.0%

    75.8 72.0 75.0 76.5 72.6 73.3

    26.7 29.2 27.5 27.8 27.6 27.6

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    22,718 - 12,463 12,065 12,697 11,995

    49,220 - 12,463 12,065 12,697 11,995

    63.3% - 57.4% 74.9% 60.5% 60.6%

    75.8 - 76.0 78.7 73.9 74.5

    26.7 - 26.6 26.6 26.7 26.8

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,841 2,141 2,005 1,783 1,975 1,828

    5,122 4,316 2,535 2,165 2,462 2,276

    43.1% 38.6% 38.5% 45.1% 37.8% 43.4%

    68.2 69.7 69.4 70.4 66.7 69.2

    28.6 30.7 29.3 29.9 29.6 29.6

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,841 - 1,308 1,219 1,386 1,209

    5,122 - 1,308 1,219 1,386 1,209

    43.1% - 39.3% 51.4% 39.1% 43.3%

    68.2 - 68.5 71.1 65.3 68.1

    28.6 - 28.6 28.5 28.6 28.8

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,114 836 782 723 796 716

    2,002 1,752 973 903 986 892

    44.0% 38.5% 39.4% 43.4% 39.8% 43.6%

    68.3 69.7 69.3 70.2 66.8 69.6

    30.1 31.9 30.9 31.3 31.1 30.6

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,114 - 485 491 547 479

    2,002 - 485 491 547 479

    44.0% - 39.6% 48.9% 42.2% 45.5%

    68.3 - 68.5 70.5 65.8 68.7

    30.1 - 30.2 30.2 30.2 29.9

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    9,652 6,970 6,724 6,097 6,598 6,169

    17,567 14,073 8,445 7,336 8,159 7,700

    45.2% 38.8% 39.7% 46.1% 40.4% 43.6%

    69.2 69.8 69.9 70.9 67.7 69.6

    29.0 30.9 29.7 30.2 29.8 29.8

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    9,652 - 4,464 4,288 4,647 4,168

    17,567 - 4,464 4,288 4,647 4,168

    45.2% - 41.4% 53.1% 41.8% 44.8%

    69.2 - 69.1 71.9 66.8 69.1

    29.0 - 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.1

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 27

  • Regional Accreditation:Middle States

    28

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    10,324 7,031 6,820 5,841 7,000 6,145

    17,451 12,777 8,039 6,677 8,254 7,258

    51.1% 39.3% 43.6% 52.7% 42.4% 46.9%

    71.0 69.9 71.1 72.6 68.3 70.5

    26.9 29.1 27.8 28.0 27.6 27.8

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    10,324 - 4,489 3,995 4,909 4,058

    17,451 - 4,489 3,995 4,909 4,058

    51.1% - 45.7% 62.8% 46.6% 50.8%

    71.0 - 71.1 74.3 68.4 70.8

    26.9 - 27.0 26.7 26.8 26.9

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 31

  • Regional Accreditation:New England

    32

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,198 1,930 2,036 1,790 2,197 1,987

    5,720 3,450 2,373 1,973 2,540 2,284

    56.1% 45.3% 50.0% 60.3% 47.9% 51.5%

    73.5 71.4 73.8 74.8 70.5 72.3

    26.4 28.3 27.1 27.5 26.9 27.0

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,198 - 1,420 1,345 1,559 1,396

    5,720 - 1,420 1,345 1,559 1,396

    56.1% - 51.8% 67.9% 52.0% 53.6%

    73.5 - 74.1 76.4 71.1 72.7

    26.4 - 26.6 26.6 26.1 26.3

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 35

  • Regional Accreditation:North Central States

    36

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    16,037 9,961 11,781 10,564 11,559 11,014

    33,230 18,736 13,939 11,746 13,377 12,904

    58.0% 43.2% 48.7% 61.5% 50.2% 51.4%

    73.9 71.1 73.3 75.3 71.1 72.0

    27.1 29.7 27.9 28.3 28.0 27.9

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    16,037 - 8,430 8,169 8,663 7,968

    33,230 - 8,430 8,169 8,663 7,968

    58.0% - 52.1% 69.4% 55.5% 55.2%

    73.9 - 73.9 77.1 71.9 72.6

    27.1 - 27.0 27.1 27.1 27.1

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 39

  • Regional Accreditation:Northwest

    40

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,026 1,628 2,043 1,835 2,085 1,984

    6,051 3,026 2,378 2,017 2,396 2,286

    63.2% 44.6% 54.0% 65.1% 53.9% 56.3%

    75.7 71.7 75.1 76.4 72.9 73.5

    28.4 30.6 28.9 29.2 29.2 29.2

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,026 - 1,518 1,466 1,593 1,474

    6,051 - 1,518 1,466 1,593 1,474

    63.2% - 57.7% 72.7% 60.9% 61.9%

    75.7 - 75.9 78.1 74.2 74.7

    28.4 - 28.2 28.4 28.5 28.7

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 43

  • Regional Accreditation:Southern States

    44

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    12,551 8,138 9,079 8,432 8,862 8,519

    25,840 15,639 10,928 9,643 10,564 10,344

    59.9% 43.4% 50.8% 59.5% 51.7% 53.2%

    74.5 71.4 74.2 74.9 71.6 72.6

    27.5 30.4 28.4 28.8 28.6 28.5

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    12,551 - 6,575 6,389 6,653 6,223

    25,840 - 6,575 6,389 6,653 6,223

    59.9% - 55.0% 68.8% 57.6% 58.2%

    74.5 - 75.0 76.7 72.5 73.6

    27.5 - 27.4 27.5 27.6 27.6

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 47

  • Regional Accreditation:Western States

    48

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    6,299 4,740 4,532 4,186 4,559 4,340

    11,621 9,922 5,613 5,006 5,557 5,367

    49.2% 40.4% 43.1% 49.7% 42.0% 46.3%

    70.4 70.5 71.0 72.3 68.0 70.5

    28.3 30.5 29.2 29.7 29.3 29.1

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    6,299 - 2,861 2,790 3,107 2,863

    11,621 - 2,861 2,790 3,107 2,863

    49.2% - 45.5% 59.4% 44.6% 47.9%

    70.4 - 70.5 73.8 67.5 69.9

    28.3 - 28.3 28.1 28.5 28.3

    Female Male Domestic Foreign 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 51

  • International Institutions

    52

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    9,184 5,755 6,344 5,855 6,594 5,514

    17,299 11,465 7,619 6,936 7,519 6,690

    47.2% 38.3% 39.6% 46.8% 45.4% 43.1%

    68.7 69.4 68.5 71.3 68.1 68.0

    30.5 33.5 31.7 31.8 31.8 31.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    9,184 - 4,351 4,188 4,838 3,922

    17,299 - 4,351 4,188 4,838 3,922

    47.2% - 41.5% 54.4% 48.5% 44.0%

    68.7 - 67.8 72.1 68.0 67.0

    30.5 - 30.5 30.3 30.7 30.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 55

  • 2014 Jurisdiction Institution Performance: Overall and First-Time

    This section contains summary performance of all educational institutions in a given state.

    56

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    841 511 581 521 561 506

    1,621 931 701 602 658 591

    55.0% 46.6% 47.7% 57.3% 49.4% 54.3%

    72.9 71.5 73.0 73.6 70.6 72.4

    27.1 29.2 27.5 28.1 28.2 27.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    841 - 433 394 430 364

    1,621 - 433 394 430 364

    55.0% - 49.0% 64.7% 50.9% 56.3%

    72.9 - 73.4 75.2 70.6 72.5

    27.1 - 27.0 27.1 27.4 27.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    85 50 40 51 55 56

    137 93 45 57 64 64

    48.2% 35.5% 55.6% 43.9% 32.8% 43.8%

    69.6 71.2 74.2 71.8 67.9 68.4

    30.7 32.1 30.4 31.5 31.7 31.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    85 - 26 33 35 43

    137 - 26 33 35 43

    48.2% - 61.5% 51.5% 40.0% 44.2%

    69.6 - 73.7 71.9 67.3 67.1

    30.7 - 29.7 31.1 31.3 30.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,030 682 678 655 683 668

    1,903 1,251 818 748 788 800

    48.5% 42.1% 42.9% 48.9% 45.4% 46.8%

    69.8 69.7 70.3 70.9 67.7 70.1

    31.2 34.0 32.3 33.0 32.1 31.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,030 - 467 474 496 466

    1,903 - 467 474 496 466

    48.5% - 44.3% 54.4% 46.2% 49.1%

    69.8 - 70.2 71.8 67.3 70.0

    31.2 - 31.2 31.2 31.4 31.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    379 290 260 261 287 283

    772 537 328 302 342 337

    50.3% 39.3% 41.5% 49.3% 45.6% 46.9%

    70.9 69.7 70.6 72.0 69.6 69.7

    26.6 29.2 28.0 27.5 27.7 27.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    379 - 185 193 201 193

    772 - 185 193 201 193

    50.3% - 42.2% 57.5% 50.3% 50.8%

    70.9 - 70.6 73.9 69.4 69.9

    26.6 - 26.5 26.6 26.9 26.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    6,191 4,678 4,491 4,130 4,471 4,290

    11,483 9,780 5,565 4,937 5,451 5,310

    49.3% 40.6% 43.3% 49.8% 42.3% 46.4%

    70.4 70.5 71.1 72.3 68.1 70.5

    28.3 30.5 29.3 29.6 29.3 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    6,191 - 2,834 2,765 3,040 2,844

    11,483 - 2,834 2,765 3,040 2,844

    49.3% - 45.7% 59.5% 44.9% 47.8%

    70.4 - 70.5 73.8 67.6 69.9

    28.3 - 28.3 28.1 28.5 28.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    857 521 590 537 572 541

    1,629 952 694 597 663 627

    57.2% 43.0% 49.6% 59.6% 49.0% 50.2%

    74.1 71.3 73.6 75.1 71.3 72.5

    29.2 31.1 29.9 29.9 29.9 29.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    857 - 421 411 416 381

    1,629 - 421 411 416 381

    57.2% - 56.1% 67.9% 54.8% 49.3%

    74.1 - 74.5 76.9 72.5 72.5

    29.2 - 29.5 29.1 29.0 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    724 462 415 403 480 425

    1,186 822 497 450 565 496

    51.3% 44.3% 46.3% 57.3% 42.0% 49.8%

    72.1 71.2 72.2 73.6 69.2 72.4

    26.5 28.4 27.5 27.6 27.0 26.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    724 - 271 297 311 307

    1,186 - 271 297 311 307

    51.3% - 45.4% 65.0% 42.1% 52.4%

    72.1 - 72.2 74.9 68.8 72.6

    26.5 - 27.2 26.4 25.9 26.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    209 147 140 123 151 144

    388 264 164 140 176 172

    60.1% 45.5% 48.2% 67.1% 50.6% 52.9%

    75.0 72.7 74.8 76.9 71.7 73.5

    25.4 28.0 26.3 27.1 26.5 26.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    209 - 101 89 107 91

    388 - 101 89 107 91

    60.1% - 45.5% 75.3% 63.6% 57.1%

    75.0 - 73.9 79.0 73.3 74.0

    25.4 - 25.3 25.8 25.5 25.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    371 249 262 233 254 265

    720 491 312 267 302 330

    56.5% 35.0% 43.9% 58.1% 48.3% 42.7%

    71.7 69.5 71.6 73.9 68.6 69.6

    29.4 33.0 31.1 30.6 30.6 31.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    371 - 182 173 178 187

    720 - 182 173 178 187

    56.5% - 50.6% 68.8% 56.2% 51.3%

    71.7 - 72.5 75.5 69.0 70.0

    29.4 - 29.7 29.2 29.2 29.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    687 455 469 451 496 453

    1,294 867 548 492 587 534

    62.3% 42.0% 51.6% 61.0% 51.6% 53.2%

    74.7 71.2 74.6 74.9 71.1 72.8

    29.2 31.7 29.9 30.8 30.0 30.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    687 - 309 321 350 314

    1,294 - 309 321 350 314

    62.3% - 56.6% 70.7% 58.6% 63.4%

    74.7 - 76.1 76.4 71.7 74.7

    29.2 - 28.7 29.2 29.5 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,296 750 843 756 818 793

    2,322 1,275 937 825 940 895

    57.8% 45.4% 51.2% 58.1% 50.3% 54.8%

    73.4 72.1 73.7 74.8 70.9 72.6

    27.9 31.4 28.8 29.3 29.2 29.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,296 - 590 571 594 567

    2,322 - 590 571 594 567

    57.8% - 54.4% 66.0% 53.2% 58.0%

    73.4 - 74.4 76.0 70.7 72.7

    27.9 - 27.6 27.8 28.0 28.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    37 18 22 14 36 10

    58 34 24 17 39 12

    36.2% 29.4% 37.5% 17.7% 41.0% 25.0%

    64.3 71.3 67.7 66.7 66.7 66.0

    32.7 33.8 35.2 33.8 32.5 29.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    37 - 11 10 31 6

    58 - 11 10 31 6

    36.2% - 27.3% 20.0% 45.2% 33.3%

    64.3 - 59.8 64.3 66.1 63.3

    32.7 - 35.6 33.8 31.9 29.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    166 129 99 108 118 110

    263 265 123 127 148 130

    36.5% 32.5% 32.5% 39.4% 27.7% 39.2%

    66.4 67.8 67.2 69.4 63.9 68.4

    29.0 31.5 29.3 31.1 30.0 30.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    166 - 62 63 77 61

    263 - 62 63 77 61

    36.5% - 30.7% 46.0% 28.6% 42.6%

    66.4 - 66.5 70.1 62.9 66.8

    29.0 - 27.9 29.1 29.1 29.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    280 202 213 191 200 204

    551 429 260 220 246 254

    52.6% 45.2% 46.2% 55.9% 46.8% 49.6%

    71.8 72.3 71.8 74.1 71.1 71.2

    28.3 30.2 29.0 29.0 28.9 29.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    280 - 136 138 147 130

    551 - 136 138 147 130

    52.6% - 46.3% 60.9% 51.7% 51.5%

    71.8 - 70.5 74.8 70.9 70.9

    28.3 - 28.0 28.1 28.1 29.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,865 2,006 2,171 1,889 2,080 2,020

    5,949 3,903 2,662 2,192 2,520 2,478

    54.6% 42.2% 46.5% 57.8% 46.4% 49.2%

    72.7 70.8 72.5 74.5 70.0 71.1

    27.2 30.0 28.2 28.7 28.3 28.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,865 - 1,509 1,424 1,542 1,474

    5,949 - 1,509 1,424 1,542 1,474

    54.6% - 51.2% 65.1% 50.4% 52.2%

    72.7 - 72.9 76.2 70.2 71.5

    27.2 - 27.0 27.3 27.3 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,497 911 1,176 1,041 1,090 1,117

    3,350 1,720 1,394 1,120 1,260 1,296

    62.0% 42.8% 50.2% 68.5% 53.3% 52.1%

    75.6 71.2 74.4 77.8 72.3 72.5

    25.8 28.5 26.5 27.0 26.7 26.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,497 - 850 835 834 831

    3,350 - 850 835 834 831

    62.0% - 53.9% 76.5% 60.3% 57.4%

    75.6 - 75.5 79.9 73.6 73.5

    25.8 - 25.7 25.8 25.8 25.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    695 390 510 433 479 475

    1,452 707 607 472 542 538

    56.9% 43.4% 47.1% 62.3% 49.6% 52.8%

    73.8 71.1 72.7 75.5 71.4 72.5

    26.6 28.9 27.1 27.1 27.6 27.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    695 - 377 350 378 347

    1,452 - 377 350 378 347

    56.9% - 50.4% 68.0% 54.5% 55.3%

    73.8 - 73.2 76.7 72.4 73.0

    26.6 - 26.4 26.3 26.8 26.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    435 289 340 297 356 342

    982 564 409 331 414 392

    59.6% 44.2% 50.1% 61.9% 50.2% 55.1%

    74.6 72.0 74.6 76.0 71.1 73.4

    26.8 28.8 27.5 27.6 27.6 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    435 - 254 223 259 246

    982 - 254 223 259 246

    59.6% - 51.2% 73.1% 57.1% 58.5%

    74.6 - 74.7 78.4 71.8 74.1

    26.8 - 27.0 26.6 26.7 26.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    620 441 460 394 431 426

    1,201 903 553 465 548 538

    51.9% 41.1% 46.3% 53.1% 44.5% 45.9%

    72.0 71.2 72.0 74.0 70.3 70.7

    27.2 29.2 27.9 28.4 28.0 28.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    620 - 297 281 308 315

    1,201 - 297 281 308 315

    51.9% - 49.5% 60.5% 51.6% 46.7%

    72.0 - 71.2 75.5 71.0 70.7

    27.2 - 27.0 27.2 27.3 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    869 537 579 521 607 555

    1,598 1,000 680 580 691 647

    56.4% 42.5% 48.5% 55.7% 48.9% 51.8%

    72.7 70.8 73.3 73.0 70.0 71.9

    27.7 30.3 28.9 28.7 28.4 28.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    869 - 403 379 438 378

    1,598 - 403 379 438 378

    56.4% - 51.9% 63.6% 52.7% 58.2%

    72.7 - 73.1 74.7 70.5 73.1

    27.7 - 27.9 27.5 27.7 27.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    78 45 47 37 47 43

    131 74 56 45 54 50

    45.0% 46.0% 46.4% 46.7% 40.7% 48.0%

    69.9 71.6 70.0 72.9 67.7 71.8

    28.7 29.4 30.0 28.5 28.6 28.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    78 - 33 29 38 31

    131 - 33 29 38 31

    45.0% - 45.5% 48.3% 36.8% 51.6%

    69.9 - 69.8 73.6 65.6 71.5

    28.7 - 28.2 29.0 29.0 28.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    418 313 305 233 293 286

    777 557 371 253 369 341

    54.2% 41.1% 45.3% 61.7% 44.4% 47.5%

    72.6 70.9 73.2 75.2 69.5 70.8

    28.3 31.7 29.7 30.0 29.7 29.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    418 - 209 172 208 188

    777 - 209 172 208 188

    54.2% - 48.3% 72.1% 49.0% 50.0%

    72.6 - 74.2 76.9 69.1 70.9

    28.3 - 27.8 28.6 28.4 28.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,742 1,020 1,157 986 1,220 1,133

    3,259 1,835 1,324 1,068 1,398 1,304

    59.3% 45.2% 52.6% 63.7% 50.5% 51.9%

    74.6 71.5 74.7 75.8 71.5 72.6

    26.0 28.3 26.7 27.2 26.7 26.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,742 - 826 743 889 801

    3,259 - 826 743 889 801

    59.3% - 55.3% 71.9% 55.8% 55.4%

    74.6 - 75.3 77.6 72.6 73.5

    26.0 - 26.0 26.3 25.8 26.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,611 867 1,181 956 1,066 1,002

    3,198 1,540 1,345 1,030 1,217 1,146

    62.0% 46.0% 52.3% 68.0% 54.0% 55.2%

    75.4 72.0 74.6 76.5 72.6 73.7

    26.9 28.9 27.2 27.9 27.6 27.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,611 - 877 766 829 726

    3,198 - 877 766 829 726

    62.0% - 55.1% 74.0% 59.7% 60.5%

    75.4 - 75.3 78.0 73.7 74.8

    26.9 - 26.6 27.1 27.0 26.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    980 558 702 644 724 696

    2,075 1,031 806 688 820 792

    55.7% 46.9% 48.1% 65.0% 50.1% 49.6%

    73.7 71.6 73.3 76.2 71.1 72.0

    26.3 28.1 26.8 26.9 27.1 26.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    980 - 506 523 539 507

    2,075 - 506 523 539 507

    55.7% - 49.6% 70.2% 52.9% 49.9%

    73.7 - 73.6 77.5 71.7 72.3

    26.3 - 26.1 26.3 26.4 26.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    420 322 346 326 335 328

    975 640 424 380 405 406

    55.3% 36.9% 43.4% 54.2% 48.6% 46.3%

    73.0 69.8 72.0 73.2 70.6 71.3

    27.0 30.0 28.1 28.0 28.3 28.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    420 - 253 235 238 249

    975 - 253 235 238 249

    55.3% - 48.2% 63.8% 58.0% 51.8%

    73.0 - 73.0 75.1 72.2 71.7

    27.0 - 26.9 27.0 27.1 27.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    977 576 760 679 741 674

    2,170 1,082 897 734 835 786

    63.3% 44.1% 51.7% 68.0% 53.7% 56.0%

    74.9 70.9 73.7 76.4 71.7 72.9

    26.7 28.9 27.3 27.7 27.6 27.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    977 - 545 546 567 512

    2,170 - 545 546 567 512

    63.3% - 54.7% 74.0% 62.6% 61.9%

    74.9 - 74.6 77.8 73.5 73.9

    26.7 - 26.6 26.8 26.8 26.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    149 97 102 103 113 100

    297 179 119 117 127 113

    57.2% 38.6% 47.1% 56.4% 45.7% 52.2%

    73.7 70.3 74.0 73.9 70.1 71.8

    29.1 29.2 29.5 28.2 29.6 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    149 - 73 80 81 63

    297 - 73 80 81 63

    57.2% - 49.3% 67.5% 48.2% 65.1%

    73.7 - 74.6 75.8 70.7 73.9

    29.1 - 29.0 28.1 29.5 29.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    321 173 210 191 226 195

    626 293 236 210 254 219

    58.5% 40.6% 51.3% 62.4% 46.1% 53.0%

    74.3 70.8 74.5 76.2 70.5 72.0

    26.3 29.0 26.9 27.4 27.2 27.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    321 - 154 155 176 141

    626 - 154 155 176 141

    58.5% - 53.9% 71.6% 52.3% 56.7%

    74.3 - 75.9 78.2 70.7 72.8

    26.3 - 26.0 26.5 26.3 26.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    239 172 183 162 168 160

    485 338 234 195 203 191

    54.4% 43.5% 45.3% 59.5% 44.8% 51.3%

    73.1 71.1 72.4 74.5 69.8 72.3

    30.1 31.2 30.2 30.7 31.0 30.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    239 - 131 124 117 113

    485 - 131 124 117 113

    54.4% - 48.1% 62.1% 53.0% 54.9%

    73.1 - 72.0 75.2 71.2 73.8

    30.1 - 29.8 30.1 30.1 30.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    185 98 122 96 116 102

    313 176 145 108 124 112

    54.0% 50.0% 49.0% 60.2% 50.0% 52.7%

    71.6 72.2 73.2 73.7 68.5 71.8

    30.0 29.7 30.1 29.8 30.3 29.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    185 - 87 72 92 62

    313 - 87 72 92 62

    54.0% - 48.3% 66.7% 51.1% 51.6%

    71.6 - 71.7 75.2 68.9 71.1

    30.0 - 31.0 29.8 30.0 29.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,609 1,096 1,065 863 1,058 925

    2,571 2,051 1,274 1,003 1,267 1,078

    45.6% 37.0% 39.7% 46.9% 38.8% 43.0%

    68.7 69.1 69.5 70.7 66.4 69.3

    27.6 29.5 28.4 28.7 28.4 28.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,609 - 657 565 742 607

    2,571 - 657 565 742 607

    45.6% - 40.9% 56.1% 41.1% 46.3%

    68.7 - 68.6 71.9 65.9 69.3

    27.6 - 27.7 27.6 27.4 27.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    201 137 130 104 144 115

    330 259 154 128 173 134

    54.2% 40.2% 46.8% 51.6% 41.0% 55.2%

    72.9 71.0 73.9 72.9 68.5 73.6

    29.9 32.1 31.6 30.9 30.4 30.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    201 - 87 64 102 77

    330 - 87 64 102 77

    54.2% - 49.4% 67.2% 45.1% 61.0%

    72.9 - 75.3 74.2 68.7 74.5

    29.9 - 30.6 29.7 29.7 29.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    4,989 3,267 3,106 2,659 3,238 2,720

    7,983 5,794 3,687 3,046 3,813 3,231

    51.2% 38.7% 42.9% 51.6% 42.6% 48.0%

    71.1 69.7 70.8 72.3 68.4 70.8

    27.1 29.1 28.0 28.3 27.6 28.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    4,989 - 2,052 1,820 2,270 1,841

    7,983 - 2,052 1,820 2,270 1,841

    51.2% - 45.1% 62.4% 46.5% 52.7%

    71.1 - 70.8 74.2 68.7 71.3

    27.1 - 27.2 27.1 27.0 27.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,202 793 986 959 915 931

    2,872 1,590 1,200 1,070 1,095 1,097

    61.6% 46.4% 52.2% 64.3% 52.2% 56.5%

    75.1 72.0 74.7 76.0 72.0 73.3

    27.2 29.3 27.8 28.1 28.0 27.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,202 - 735 750 711 676

    2,872 - 735 750 711 676

    61.6% - 57.1% 70.7% 56.7% 61.5%

    75.1 - 75.5 77.5 72.8 74.4

    27.2 - 27.1 27.1 27.4 27.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    205 117 142 137 149 113

    420 232 180 154 183 135

    55.5% 48.7% 45.6% 62.3% 53.0% 52.6%

    73.5 72.9 73.4 75.0 71.9 72.9

    26.2 28.0 27.4 26.9 26.8 26.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    205 - 101 107 123 89

    420 - 101 107 123 89

    55.5% - 46.5% 63.6% 57.7% 52.8%

    73.5 - 72.8 76.1 72.3 73.0

    26.2 - 27.1 26.3 25.8 25.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,996 1,236 1,488 1,348 1,478 1,349

    4,075 2,350 1,706 1,477 1,686 1,556

    57.9% 44.4% 49.4% 61.8% 50.2% 51.4%

    73.7 71.6 73.4 75.5 71.4 71.5

    26.4 29.1 27.2 27.5 27.4 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,996 - 1,014 1,042 1,075 944

    4,075 - 1,014 1,042 1,075 944

    57.9% - 52.0% 70.0% 54.2% 55.0%

    73.7 - 73.8 77.0 71.9 71.8

    26.4 - 26.3 26.4 26.2 26.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    506 435 405 411 404 384

    1,091 806 493 456 480 468

    57.3% 36.7% 45.8% 53.5% 46.5% 48.7%

    73.4 68.4 72.1 71.8 70.0 71.2

    28.5 32.5 30.2 30.7 29.8 30.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    506 - 276 273 278 264

    1,091 - 276 273 278 264

    57.3% - 53.3% 65.6% 54.3% 56.1%

    73.4 - 74.0 75.5 70.9 73.4

    28.5 - 28.1 28.4 28.8 28.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    518 321 359 333 358 355

    1,021 615 428 368 428 412

    63.2% 43.4% 54.2% 63.6% 54.2% 51.9%

    75.8 71.3 75.2 75.6 73.7 72.0

    27.9 30.5 28.6 28.8 28.9 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    518 - 250 255 262 254

    1,021 - 250 255 262 254

    63.2% - 59.2% 71.8% 63.7% 57.9%

    75.8 - 75.9 78.2 75.9 73.1

    27.9 - 27.8 27.6 28.0 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,333 1,617 1,685 1,502 1,719 1,613

    4,446 3,039 1,936 1,678 1,999 1,872

    55.1% 42.7% 49.1% 58.5% 44.4% 49.4%

    72.8 70.8 73.2 74.5 69.5 71.1

    25.6 27.9 26.4 26.7 26.6 26.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    2,333 - 1,136 1,060 1,208 1,042

    4,446 - 1,136 1,060 1,208 1,042

    55.1% - 51.5% 67.3% 49.9% 52.6%

    72.8 - 73.5 76.4 70.0 71.4

    25.6 - 25.8 25.3 25.8 25.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    571 420 352 306 394 289

    862 723 407 377 455 346

    30.7% 36.9% 31.9% 34.8% 32.8% 35.3%

    62.3 68.3 65.0 65.8 63.4 66.4

    26.8 28.7 27.3 28.3 27.6 27.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    571 - 226 177 281 178

    862 - 226 177 281 178

    30.7% - 28.8% 35.6% 30.3% 29.2%

    62.3 - 62.3 63.1 60.7 63.9

    26.8 - 27.0 26.8 26.7 26.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    385 257 241 219 282 239

    681 462 287 245 340 271

    51.0% 45.9% 46.7% 53.1% 45.0% 52.4%

    71.7 71.1 73.1 73.6 69.1 70.7

    25.6 27.2 26.2 26.5 26.0 26.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    385 - 163 162 194 162

    681 - 163 162 194 162

    51.0% - 47.9% 59.9% 49.5% 46.9%

    71.7 - 73.1 74.7 69.6 69.8

    25.6 - 25.8 25.7 25.2 25.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    457 262 357 297 312 324

    1,023 466 418 327 362 382

    64.4% 46.8% 55.0% 63.6% 59.9% 58.1%

    75.9 71.9 75.3 75.6 73.7 73.9

    25.7 28.1 26.3 26.6 26.1 26.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    457 - 277 243 255 248

    1,023 - 277 243 255 248

    64.4% - 58.5% 73.3% 65.1% 61.7%

    75.9 - 75.8 77.6 74.9 75.2

    25.7 - 25.8 25.7 25.5 25.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    143 91 97 80 92 75

    241 175 126 96 110 84

    54.8% 46.3% 47.6% 56.3% 44.6% 59.5%

    73.7 72.3 72.9 73.6 71.3 75.2

    29.1 30.4 29.7 29.6 30.0 29.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    143 - 71 60 64 46

    241 - 71 60 64 46

    54.8% - 50.7% 55.0% 51.6% 65.2%

    73.7 - 72.7 73.1 72.5 77.4

    29.1 - 29.1 28.6 30.3 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    887 534 613 593 627 596

    1,811 972 695 663 736 689

    59.7% 40.5% 52.7% 55.7% 49.9% 54.1%

    74.4 70.8 74.5 74.3 71.3 72.7

    27.7 30.5 28.5 29.1 28.5 28.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    887 - 444 452 484 431

    1,811 - 444 452 484 431

    59.7% - 56.1% 64.6% 57.0% 61.3%

    74.4 - 74.8 76.2 72.3 74.6

    27.7 - 27.7 27.6 27.8 27.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,931 2,634 2,840 2,662 2,800 2,669

    8,224 5,270 3,558 3,134 3,404 3,398

    61.3% 41.9% 51.0% 59.8% 52.0% 52.7%

    75.0 70.9 74.4 75.0 71.6 72.6

    27.9 31.3 29.0 29.6 29.2 29.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    3,931 - 2,098 2,024 2,113 1,989

    8,224 - 2,098 2,024 2,113 1,989

    61.3% - 56.6% 71.0% 59.4% 58.4%

    75.0 - 75.9 77.2 73.1 73.7

    27.9 - 27.7 27.9 27.9 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    744 312 520 451 514 469

    1,590 572 582 482 577 521

    73.1% 48.8% 63.8% 73.2% 66.0% 64.5%

    79.5 73.0 78.6 79.5 76.7 76.3

    28.6 31.4 29.3 29.6 29.1 29.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    744 - 418 383 418 371

    1,590 - 418 383 418 371

    73.1% - 67.5% 80.7% 72.7% 72.0%

    79.5 - 80.0 81.3 78.5 78.0

    28.6 - 28.6 28.8 28.5 28.7

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    95 55 57 57 59 49

    160 94 65 66 68 55

    58.8% 42.6% 44.6% 57.6% 55.9% 52.7%

    74.4 70.4 73.0 74.8 71.6 72.2

    28.5 31.1 29.6 31.4 28.8 27.8

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    95 - 41 45 40 34

    160 - 41 45 40 34

    58.8% - 51.2% 60.0% 67.5% 55.9%

    74.4 - 74.7 76.6 73.1 72.8

    28.5 - 28.6 29.7 27.5 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,501 996 1,112 1,039 1,062 1,045

    3,176 1,927 1,338 1,209 1,257 1,299

    60.8% 46.3% 52.3% 61.5% 55.1% 53.0%

    75.1 72.3 74.9 75.9 72.7 72.9

    27.1 29.8 28.2 28.3 28.1 28.0

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,501 - 811 801 802 762

    3,176 - 811 801 802 762

    60.8% - 55.5% 70.9% 60.7% 55.9%

    75.1 - 75.7 77.6 73.8 73.2

    27.1 - 27.1 27.0 27.0 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,019 479 632 550 681 645

    1,983 811 718 584 755 737

    62.2% 44.5% 52.4% 68.0% 52.2% 58.1%

    75.2 71.4 74.4 76.7 71.7 74.2

    27.9 30.2 28.2 28.8 28.8 28.5

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,019 - 487 458 534 504

    1,983 - 487 458 534 504

    62.2% - 55.2% 74.9% 57.9% 62.1%

    75.2 - 75.3 78.0 72.6 75.1

    27.9 - 27.4 27.9 28.1 28.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    250 229 190 179 177 181

    435 487 247 226 216 233

    45.5% 38.0% 40.1% 45.6% 42.6% 38.2%

    69.7 69.6 71.4 71.9 66.2 68.8

    27.3 30.1 28.4 28.6 29.1 29.2

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    250 - 116 106 116 97

    435 - 116 106 116 97

    45.5% - 36.2% 59.4% 44.8% 42.3%

    69.7 - 70.0 73.8 66.8 68.5

    27.3 - 27.4 26.6 27.2 28.1

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,192 577 862 815 891 833

    2,702 1,069 974 884 966 947

    67.3% 47.3% 55.7% 72.3% 62.5% 56.9%

    77.2 72.8 76.2 78.8 75.2 73.9

    25.8 28.3 26.4 26.5 26.5 26.6

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    1,192 - 666 671 722 643

    2,702 - 666 671 722 643

    67.3% - 59.3% 80.2% 67.5% 61.9%

    77.2 - 77.0 80.5 76.6 74.7

    25.8 - 25.7 25.8 25.7 25.9

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    66 38 46 43 41 44

    132 74 56 47 49 54

    50.8% 41.9% 35.7% 55.3% 51.0% 50.0%

    73.1 70.6 73.3 74.0 69.7 71.7

    28.1 28.9 28.5 28.6 29.3 27.4

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • FT RE AUD BEC FAR REG

    66 - 38 33 28 33

    132 - 38 33 28 33

    50.8% - 39.5% 60.6% 57.1% 48.5%

    73.1 - 73.5 75.7 72.1 70.9

    28.1 - 27.8 28.6 29.0 27.3

    Female Male U.S.A. Int'l 2014 2013 2012 Other

  • 163

  • 2014 Institution Rankings

    This section contains rankings of the top 40 educational institutions in the U.S. These rankings are calculated from the average pass rate for each institution. In addition to the overall rankings, the top 40 rankings for various program size groups are also provided.

    164

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 PA UNIV PA (3378) 20 39 89.7% 84.0

    2 WI UNIV WI MADISON (3895) 187 553 87.3% 84.4

    3 NC WAKE FOREST UNIV (2978) 79 281 86.8% 84.2

    4 GA UNIV GA (1598) 242 566 86.2% 82.7

    5 VA WASHINGTON & LEE UNIV (3768) 20 52 84.6% 84.4

    6 VA UNIV VA (3745) 98 246 84.6% 83.5

    7 UT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV (3670) 268 673 84.0% 83.6

    8 FL UNIV FL (1535) 120 274 82.9% 82.6

    9 TN UNIV TN KNOXVILLE (3530) 134 326 82.8% 81.8

    10 TX UNIV TX AUSTIN (3658) 413 1,092 82.8% 82.0

    11 TN VANDERBILT UNIV (3535) 54 174 82.8% 81.8

    12 MI UNIV MI ANN ARBOR (2325) 110 306 82.7% 82.9

    13 IN UNIV NOTRE DAME (1840) 199 539 81.8% 82.9

    13 DC GEORGETOWN UNIV (1445) 45 110 81.8% 83.3

    15 MA BOSTON COLL (2128) 195 466 80.3% 81.1

    16 GA EMORY UNIV (1564) 65 149 79.2% 81.1

    17 ME UNIV ME (2053) 13 24 79.2% 81.2

    18 SC FURMAN UNIV (3434) 14 38 79.0% 81.8

    19 MO UNIV MO COLLUMBIA (2516) 163 474 78.3% 80.3

    20 MI AQUINAS COLL (2239) 10 23 78.3% 80.8

    21 TX TX A&M UNIV (3632) 377 1,156 78.2% 80.7

    22 WA WESTERN WA UNIV (3802) 77 150 78.0% 78.9

    22 MI HILLSDALE COLL (2272) 17 50 78.0% 81.0

    24 MO WASHINGTON UNIV ST LOUIS (2520) 58 149 77.9% 81.3

    25 OH CEDARVILLE UNIV (3025) 20 48 77.1% 77.6

    26 NC UNIV NCCHAPEL HILL (2974) 147 404 76.7% 80.0

    27 OR UNIV PORTLAND (3224) 33 72 76.4% 82.2

    28 NH UNIV NH (2589) 63 110 76.4% 79.0

    29 WA GONZAGA UNIV (3778) 73 163 76.1% 80.6

    30 PA LEHIGH UNIV (3289) 95 192 76.0% 79.5

    31 FL UNIV MIAMI (1536) 75 188 75.5% 79.5

    32 CA CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLL (1170) 26 61 75.4% 80.1

    33 UT UT ST UNIV (3677) 77 170 75.3% 80.4

    34 OH JOHN CARROLL UNIV (3050) 61 147 74.8% 79.6

    35 IL NORTHWESTERN UNIV (1739) 22 47 74.5% 80.5

    36 SC WFORD COLL (3457) 16 43 74.4% 79.9

    37 IA UNIV IA (1892) 165 378 74.3% 80.0

    38 MN HAMLINE UNIV (2354) 11 35 74.3% 77.2

    39 OK UNIV OK NORMAN (3184) 104 244 74.2% 79.5

    40 MI MI ST UNIV (2290) 339 724 73.9% 78.8

    Ranking of Institutions by Pass Rate: First-Time, All ProgramsIncludes 797 institutions with 10 or more reported candidates

    165

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 WI UNIV WI MADISON (3895) 187 553 87.3% 84.4

    2 NC WAKE FOREST UNIV (2978) 79 281 86.8% 84.2

    3 GA UNIV GA (1598) 242 566 86.2% 82.7

    4 VA UNIV VA (3745) 98 246 84.6% 83.5

    5 UT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV (3670) 268 673 84.0% 83.6

    6 FL UNIV FL (1535) 120 274 82.9% 82.6

    7 TN UNIV TN KNOXVILLE (3530) 134 326 82.8% 81.8

    8 TX UNIV TX AUSTIN (3658) 413 1,092 82.8% 82.0

    9 MI UNIV MI ANN ARBOR (2325) 110 306 82.7% 82.9

    10 NC UNIV NOTRE DAME (1840) 199 539 81.8% 82.9

    11 MA BOSTON COLL (2128) 195 466 80.3% 81.1

    12 GA EMORY UNIV (1564) 65 149 79.2% 81.1

    13 MO UNIV MO COLLUMBIA (2516) 163 474 78.3% 80.3

    14 TX TX A&M UNIV (3632) 377 1,156 78.2% 80.7

    15 WA WESTERN WA UNIV (3802) 77 150 78.0% 78.9

    16 NC UNIV NCCHAPEL HILL (2974) 147 404 76.7% 80.0

    17 NH UNIV NH (2589) 63 110 76.4% 79.0

    18 WA GONZAGA UNIV (3778) 73 163 76.1% 80.6

    19 PA LEHIGH UNIV (3289) 95 192 76.0% 79.5

    20 FL UNIV MIAMI (1536) 75 188 75.5% 79.5

    21 UT UT ST UNIV (3677) 77 170 75.3% 80.4

    22 OH JOHN CARROLL UNIV (3050) 61 147 74.8% 79.6

    23 IA UNIV IA (1892) 165 378 74.3% 80.0

    24 OK UNIV OK NORMAN (3184) 104 244 74.2% 79.5

    25 MI MI ST UNIV (2290) 339 724 73.9% 78.8

    26 WI MARQUETTE UNIV (3863) 113 267 73.8% 79.3

    27 NY ST JOHN FISHER COLL (2821) 65 109 73.4% 77.8

    28 SC CLEMSON UNIV (3425) 66 175 73.1% 78.2

    29 VA JAMES MADISON UNIV (3721) 165 465 72.7% 79.2

    30 SC UNIV SC COLLUMBIA (3448) 129 301 72.4% 78.5

    31 PA VILLANOVA UNIV (3388) 141 325 72.0% 78.5

    32 VA VA POLY INST & ST UNIV (3754) 240 559 71.7% 78.5

    33 IN IN UNIV BLOOMINGTON (1809) 437 1,068 71.5% 78.5

    34 OR UNIV OR (3223) 167 350 71.4% 79.0

    35 CO UNIV DENVER (1371) 109 236 70.3% 78.7

    36 TX BAYLOR UNIV (3545) 147 354 70.1% 77.9

    37 NC UNIV NCCHARLOTTE (2975) 85 182 69.8% 77.0

    38 CO UNIV CO BOULDER (1370) 156 344 69.8% 78.1

    39 NY NY UNIV (2785) 120 240 69.6% 77.0

    40 LA LA ST UNIV & A&M COLL (2010) 212 418 69.4% 77.2

    Ranking of Institutions by Pass Rate: First-Time, Large ProgramsIncludes 255 institutions with more than 60 reported candidates

    166

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 TN VANDERBILT UNIV (3535) 54 174 82.8% 81.8

    2 DC GEORGETOWN UNIV (1445) 45 110 81.8% 83.3

    3 MO WASHINGTON UNIV ST LOUIS (2520) 58 149 77.9% 81.3

    4 OR UNIV PORTLAND (3224) 33 72 76.4% 82.2

    5 CA CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLL (1170) 26 61 75.4% 80.1

    6 IL NORTHWESTERN UNIV (1739) 22 47 74.5% 80.5

    7 MO TRUMAN ST UNIV (2495) 44 147 73.5% 79.3

    8 VA UNIV RICHMOND (3744) 55 141 72.3% 79.5

    9 NY UNIV ROCHESTER (2894) 38 83 72.3% 78.3

    10 AL SAMFORD UNIV (1036) 39 83 71.1% 78.2

    11 MO UNIV CENTRAL MO (2454) 35 72 70.8% 77.7

    12 WI UNIV WI GREEN BAY (3899) 48 101 70.3% 78.1

    13 CA POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIV (1262) 28 57 70.2% 74.3

    14 MI CALVIN COLL (2241) 30 77 70.1% 79.8

    15 TX TRINITY UNIV (3647) 45 106 69.8% 77.9

    16 NY SUNY COLL ONEONTA (2847) 26 43 69.8% 77.2

    17 NY CORNELL UNIV (2711) 48 105 69.5% 79.5

    18 PA SHIPPENSBURG UNIV PA (3326) 29 49 69.4% 77.7

    19 FL UNIV CENTRAL FL (3954) 49 91 69.2% 76.3

    20 VT UNIV VT (3696) 28 55 69.1% 77.1

    21 MA COLL HOLY CROSS (2141) 34 70 68.6% 78.8

    22 PA BUCKNELL UNIV (3238) 27 69 68.1% 78.1

    23 IN BUTLER UNIV (1788) 35 97 68.0% 76.8

    24 NE CREIGHTON UNIV (2542) 38 90 67.8% 77.6

    25 GA GA SOUTHWESTERN ST UNIV (1573) 22 34 67.7% 73.0

    26 SD UNIV SD (3474) 41 71 67.6% 77.9

    27 TN RHODES COLL (3519) 26 61 67.2% 77.4

    28 MO SAINT LOUIS UNIV (2506) 60 149 66.4% 76.1

    29 AL UNIV NORTH AL (1016) 29 45 64.4% 76.7

    30 IA DRAKE UNIV (1860) 48 98 64.3% 76.6

    30 TN LEE UNIV (3500) 34 56 64.3% 76.4

    32 WI UNIV WI OSHKOSH (3920) 60 106 64.2% 75.2

    33 SC BOB JONES UNIV (3421) 28 64 64.1% 77.6

    34 LA LA TECH UNIV (2008) 36 75 64.0% 74.2

    35 TX UNIV TX EL PASO (3661) 42 83 63.9% 77.3

    36 OK UNIV TULSA (3185) 31 66 63.6% 74.5

    37 NY ROCHESTER INST TECH (2806) 34 65 63.1% 78.6

    38 TX ST EDWARDS UNIV (3621) 24 43 62.8% 73.5

    39 IL NORTH CENTRAL COLL (1734) 27 59 62.7% 76.6

    40 SD BLACK HILLS ST UNIV (3459) 25 40 62.5% 76.1

    Ranking of Institutions by Pass Rate: First-Time, Medium ProgramsIncludes 263 institutions with 21 to 60 reported candidates

    167

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 PA UNIV PA (3378) 20 39 89.7% 84.0

    2 VA WASHINGTON & LEE UNIV (3768) 20 52 84.6% 84.4

    3 ME UNIV ME (2053) 13 24 79.2% 81.2

    4 SC FURMAN UNIV (3434) 14 38 79.0% 81.8

    5 MI AQUINAS COLL (2239) 10 23 78.3% 80.8

    6 MI HILLSDALE COLL (2272) 17 50 78.0% 81.0

    7 OH CEDARVILLE UNIV (3025) 20 48 77.1% 77.6

    8 SC WFORD COLL (3457) 16 43 74.4% 79.9

    9 MN HAMLINE UNIV (2354) 11 35 74.3% 77.2

    10 KS JOHNSON CNTY CC (8244) 12 26 73.1% 77.8

    11 MN COLL SAINT BENEDICT (2341) 20 59 72.9% 78.6

    12 NY COLUMBIA UNIV IN CITY NY (2707) 18 36 72.2% 79.7

    13 MO WESTMINSTER COLL (2523) 12 31 71.0% 78.8

    14 MI HOPE COLL (2273) 16 41 70.7% 78.7

    15 PA ALBRIGHT COLL (3229) 17 27 70.4% 72.9

    15 MN SOUTHWEST MN ST UNIV (2375) 14 27 70.4% 75.0

    17 CO WESTERN ST COLL (1372) 11 23 69.6% 77.9

    18 MO ROCKHURST UNIV (2499) 19 55 69.1% 76.9

    19 TN CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIV (3482) 12 29 69.0% 77.2

    20 KS EMPORIA ST UNIV (1927) 18 35 68.6% 77.5

    21 ID LEWIS CLARK ST COLL (1621) 10 22 68.2% 75.8

    22 TX SOUTHWESTERN UNIV (3620) 13 28 67.9% 77.3

    23 MI ALBION COLL (2235) 20 43 67.4% 77.3

    24 PA EDINBORO UNIV PA (3321) 12 18 66.7% 75.0

    24 NY SUNY COLL BUFFALO (2842) 10 21 66.7% 77.0

    24 NJ BROOKDALE CC (8404) 13 24 66.7% 75.1

    24 PA GROVE CITY COLL (3269) 16 30 66.7% 80.2

    24 WA PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIV (3785) 17 36 66.7% 73.8

    24 RI SALVE REGINA UNIV (3411) 11 18 66.7% 75.3

    24 MT MT ST UNIV BILLINGS (2530) 13 24 66.7% 75.0

    31 MN NORTHWESTERN COLL (2371) 12 29 65.5% 77.0

    32 WA BELLEVUE COLL (3769) 13 20 65.0% 71.7

    33 MI UNIV DETROIT MERCY (2323) 11 17 64.7% 70.2

    34 NE NE WESLEYAN UNIV (2555) 14 31 64.5% 72.0

    34 OR GEORGE FOX UNIV (3194) 14 31 64.5% 75.1

    36 SC UNIV SC BEAUFORT (3450) 11 28 64.3% 75.9

    37 FL UNIV WEST FL (3955) 16 25 64.0% 74.4

    38 CA DE ANZA COLL (4480) 16 33 63.6% 73.0

    38 IN UNIV EVANSVILLE (1795) 10 22 63.6% 77.0

    40 MO DRURY UNIV (2461) 15 41 63.4% 71.9

    Ranking of Institutions by Pass Rate: First-Time, Small ProgramsIncludes 258 institutions with 10 to 20 reported candidates

    168

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 MA BRANDEIS UNIV (2133) 7 16 100.0% 88.0

    1 OH FRANCISCAN UNIV STEUBENVI (3036) 7 14 100.0% 85.6

    3 RI BROWN UNIV (3401) 8 20 95.0% 86.3

    4 IN IN UNIV SYSTEM (8002) 9 17 94.1% 84.0

    5 KY CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIV (1959) 7 12 91.7% 81.8

    6 LA LA ST UNIV SYSTEM OFFICE (2009) 7 10 90.0% 82.4

    7 CA STANFORD UNIV (1305) 6 8 87.5% 79.3

    8 TN TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIV (3526) 6 14 85.7% 83.2

    9 KY ASBURY UNIV (1952) 5 6 83.3% 72.8

    9 MI MACOMB CC (8906) 5 6 83.3% 82.8

    9 IL OLIVET NAZARENE UNIV (1741) 7 12 83.3% 81.0

    12 IA NORTHWESTERN COLL (1883) 8 11 81.8% 80.5

    12 FL FLAGLER COLL (7893) 5 11 81.8% 82.4

    14 PA DICKINSON COLL (3253) 5 10 80.0% 77.4

    14 MA TUFTS UNIV (2219) 6 15 80.0% 87.5

    16 WA UNIV PUGET SOUND (3797) 7 14 78.6% 80.1

    17 IN GRACE COLL & SEM (1800) 7 23 78.3% 80.1

    18 IA CENTRAL COLL (1850) 5 9 77.8% 77.8

    18 MN NORMANDALE CC (7954) 6 9 77.8% 81.4

    20 NY COLGATE UNIV (2701) 5 13 76.9% 77.3

    20 SD SD ST UNIV (3471) 9 13 76.9% 75.5

    22 KY KY WESLEYAN COLL (1969) 8 17 76.5% 84.0

    23 NC UNIV NC ASHEVILLE (2907) 9 21 76.2% 80.7

    24 NC DAVIDSON COLL (2918) 7 25 76.0% 79.1

    25 DC SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY (1456) 7 16 75.0% 76.6

    25 PA MERCYHURST COLL (3297) 7 12 75.0% 75.7

    25 WI MARANATHA BAPTIST BIBLE C (23172) 7 12 75.0% 79.8

    25 OH WITTENBERG UNIV (3143) 7 16 75.0% 79.6

    25 NY CUNY BOROUGH MANHATTAN CC (2691) 8 12 75.0% 75.1

    30 MI MADONNA UNIV (2282) 6 15 73.3% 74.5

    31 MN ST OLAF COLL (2382) 5 11 72.7% 82.4

    31 OK OK BAPTIST UNIV (3164) 7 22 72.7% 77.6

    33 MO ST LOUISCC MERAMEC (2472) 9 14 71.4% 78.1

    33 PA CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV (3242) 7 14 71.4% 79.8

    33 OH HEIDELBERG UNIV (3048) 5 7 71.4% 76.7

    33 AL BIRMINGHAM SOUTHERN COLL (1012) 9 14 71.4% 71.9

    33 CA PACIFIC UNION COLL (1258) 5 7 71.4% 79.3

    38 VA EMORY & HENRY COLL (3709) 5 10 70.0% 76.6

    38 TN FREED HARDEMAN UNIV (3492) 6 10 70.0% 78.2

    40 TN CARSON NEWMAN COLL (3481) 8 13 69.2% 74.0

    Ranking of Institutions by Pass Rate: First-Time, Very SmallIncludes 276 institutions with 5 to 9 reported candidates (Not included in overall ranking)

    169

  • Rank State Institution (FICE)Candidates

    Total

    Sections

    Total

    Percent

    Pass

    Average

    Score

    1 NY BARUCH COLLCUNY (7273) 660 1,047 57.8% 73.7

    2 IL UNIV IL URBANA CHAMPAIGN (1775) 607 1,610 67.0% 76.9

    3 CA UNIV SOUTHERN CA (1328) 447 995 65.2% 76.8

    4 IN IN UNIV BLOOMINGTON (1809) 437 1,068 71.5% 78.5

    5 TX UNIV TX AUSTIN (3658) 413 1,092 82.8% 82.0

    6 AZ UNIV PHOENIX (20988) 409 651 29.3% 61.1

    7 TX UNIV HOUSTON (3652) 402 743 57.1% 72.9

    8 PA PENN ST UNIV PARK (3329) 388 841 65.2% 75.8

    9 CA UNIV CA SANTA BARBARA (1320) 381 757 58.7% 74.6

    10 TX TX A&M UNIV (3632) 377 1,156 78.2% 80.7

    11 IL DEPAUL UNIV (1671) 371 649 49.2% 71.1

    12 OH OH ST UNIV (3090) 361 789 65.5% 76.6

    12 CA UNIV CA LOS ANGELES (1315) 361 731 61.0% 74.7

    14 WA UNIV WA (3798) 341 725 66.1% 77.0

    15 MI MI ST UNIV (2290) 339 724 73.9% 78.8

    16 NJ RUTGERS ST UNIV NEWARK (2631) 328 548 49.6% 70.1

    17 CA CA ST UNIV FULLERTON (1137) 302 567 45.3% 68.6

    18 MA BENTLEY UNIV (2124) 296 565 65.5% 76.3

    19 AZ AZ ST UNIV (1081) 293 585 60.7% 75.0

    20 CA CA ST UNIV NORTHRIDGE (1153) 289 523 42.3% 68.7

    21 NY CUNY QUEENS COLL (2690) 283 438 36.5% 64.3

    22 NY SUNY BINGHAMTON (2836) 282 452 55.8% 72.7

    23 UT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIV (3670) 268 673 84.0% 83.6

    24 GA GA ST UNIV (1574) 256 388 47.2% 71.0

    25 IL UNIV IL CHICAGO (1776) 253 507 55.4% 73.0

    26 AL UNIV AL (1051) 249 470 58.5% 74.3

    27 CT UNIV CT (1417) 243 428 65.4% 76.5

    28 GA UNIV GA (1598) 242 566 86.2% 82.7

    29 VA VA POLY INST & ST UNIV (3754) 240 559 71.7% 78.5

    30 MA UNIV MASSACHUSETTS (2221) 239 425 51.3% 71.8

    31 CA SANTA CLARA UNIV (1326) 232 447 49.7% 71.0

    31 OH MIAMI UNIV (3077) 232 582 62.4% 76.0

    33 TX UNIV TX DALLAS (9741) 229 455 54.5% 73.1

    33 VA GEORGE MASON UNIV (3749) 229 416 54.1% 74.1

    35 TX TX TECH UNIV (3644) 225 459 61.7% 75.7

    36 CA SAN DIEGO ST UNIV (1151) 224 398 54.3% 72.4

    36 IL NORTHERN IL UNIV (1737) 224 470 63.8% 76.6

    38 CA SAN JOSE ST UNIV (1155) 222 393 42.2% 66.7

    39 NY SUNY ALBANY (2835) 219 350 59.1% 73.8

    40 LA LA ST UNIV & A&M COLL (2010) 212 418 69.4% 77.2

    Ranking of Institutions by Size: Most CandidatesSize measured by number of candidates sitting for a First-Time section during the year

    170

  • 171

  • Appendix A-1:Institution Attended - All Testing Events

    The appendices include schools with five or more candidates sitting for the Exam in 2014. This section contains summary and section performance analysis by institution attended.

    172

  • Ap

    pen

    dix

    A-1

    : A

    ll Te

    stin

    g Ev

    ents

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Ala

    bam

    a

    AL

    A&

    M U

    NIV

    (10

    02)

    1532

    1220

    25.0

    %64

    .533

    .06

    16.7

    %9

    11.1

    %9

    33.3

    %8

    37.5

    %

    AL

    ST U

    NIV

    (10

    05)

    1423

    1310

    30.4

    %64

    .232

    .411

    27.3

    %7

    14.3

    %2

    50.0

    %3

    66.7

    %

    ATH

    ENS

    ST U

    NIV

    (1

    008)

    2665

    4817

    23.1

    %60

    .429

    .814

    21.4

    %22

    31.8

    %14

    14.3

    %15

    20.0

    %

    AU

    BU

    RN

    UN

    IV (

    100

    9)17

    955

    537

    318

    259

    .6%

    75.4

    26.0

    143

    56.6

    %13

    664

    .7%

    145

    59.3

    %13

    158

    .0%

    AU

    BU

    RN

    UN

    IV M

    ON

    TGO

    MER

    Y (8

    310)

    3188

    4741

    45.5

    %69

    .731

    .622

    40.9

    %19

    47.4

    %28

    46.4

    %19

    47.4

    %

    BIR

    MIN

    GH

    AM

    SO

    UTH

    ERN

    CO

    LL (

    101

    2)18

    3815

    2352

    .6%

    69.8

    29.5

    862

    .5%

    1346

    .2%

    850

    .0%

    955

    .6%

    HU

    NTI

    NG

    DO

    N C

    OLL

    (10

    19)

    1025

    1510

    56.0

    %72

    .627

    .37

    42.9

    %5

    60.0

    %7

    57.1

    %6

    66.7

    %

    JAC

    KSO

    NV

    ILLE

    ST

    UN

    IV (

    1020

    )31

    7446

    2846

    .0%

    70.1

    29.6

    2045

    .0%

    2240

    .9%

    2142

    .9%

    1163

    .6%

    OA

    KW

    OO

    D U

    NIV

    (10

    33)

    1016

    124

    18.8

    %61

    .226

    .05

    20.0

    %2

    50.0

    %4

    0.0%

    520

    .0%

    SAM

    FOR

    D U

    NIV

    (10

    36)

    4914

    289

    5360

    .6%

    75.4

    26.1

    4156

    .1%

    2982

    .8%

    3458

    .8%

    3850

    .0%

    SPR

    ING

    HIL

    L C

    OLL

    (1

    041

    )13

    3720

    1748

    .7%

    74.3

    27.0

    1040

    .0%

    862

    .5%

    1250

    .0%

    742

    .9%

    TRO

    Y U

    NIV

    (1

    047)

    9323

    412

    610

    842

    .7%

    69.6

    29.1

    6344

    .4%

    4847

    .9%

    6830

    .9%

    5550

    .9%

    UN

    IV A

    L (1

    051)

    312

    781

    499

    282

    55.8

    %73

    .825

    .923

    848

    .3%

    174

    66.1

    %19

    852

    .5%

    171

    59.7

    %

    UN

    IV A

    L B

    IRM

    ING

    HA

    M (

    1052

    )11

    829

    515

    713

    848

    .1%

    71.7

    30.7

    7646

    .1%

    7552

    .0%

    7447

    .3%

    7047

    .1%

    UN

    IV A

    L IN

    HU

    NTS

    VIL

    LE (

    1055

    )31

    7237

    3551

    .4%

    73.4

    31.2

    2035

    .0%

    1566

    .7%

    1650

    .0%

    2157

    .1%

    UN

    IV M

    OB

    ILE

    (102

    9)16

    4124

    1724

    .4%

    60.5

    32.6

    1216

    .7%

    1428

    .6%

    520

    .0%

    1030

    .0%

    UN

    IV M

    ON

    TEV

    ALL

    O (

    1004

    )15

    4523

    2244

    .4%

    73.4

    25.3

    1250

    .0%

    742

    .9%

    1435

    .7%

    1250

    .0%

    UN

    IV N

    OR

    TH A

    L (1

    016

    )34

    6146

    1560

    .7%

    75.4

    27.9

    1353

    .9%

    2263

    .6%

    1080

    .0%

    1650

    .0%

    UN

    IV S

    OU

    TH A

    L (1

    057

    )45

    118

    7048

    43.2

    %70

    .529

    .933

    39.4

    %26

    42.3

    %28

    42.9

    %31

    48.4

    %

    UN

    IV W

    EST

    AL

    (102

    4)7

    186

    1250

    .0%

    69.3

    31.2

    450

    .0%

    560

    .0%

    633

    .3%

    366

    .7%

    Ala

    ska

    UN

    IV A

    K A

    NC

    HO

    RA

    GE

    (114

    62)

    7018

    094

    8652

    .8%

    73.2

    31.3

    3876

    .3%

    4047

    .5%

    5743

    .9%

    4548

    .9%

    UN

    IV A

    K F

    AIR

    BA

    NK

    S (1

    063

    )39

    9455

    3942

    .6%

    69.5

    31.1

    1717

    .7%

    2755

    .6%

    2236

    .4%

    2850

    .0%

    UN

    IV A

    K S

    OU

    THEA

    ST (

    106

    5)6

    1110

    127

    .3%

    64.5

    31.6

    425

    .0%

    20.

    0%4

    50.0

    %1

    0.0%

    Ari

    zon

    a

    AR

    IZO

    NA

    STA

    TE U

    NIV

    ERSI

    TY W

    EST

    (669

    35)

    616

    511

    56.3

    %71

    .635

    .32

    100.

    0%5

    80.0

    %6

    33.3

    %3

    33.3

    %

    AZ

    ST U

    NIV

    (10

    81)

    378

    960

    591

    369

    55.2

    %73

    .528

    .924

    951

    .4%

    211

    62.6

    %23

    355

    .8%

    267

    52.4

    %

    DEV

    RY

    UN

    IV P

    HO

    ENIX

    (83

    22)

    1940

    1525

    27.5

    %67

    .633

    .014

    35.7

    %9

    11.1

    %12

    33.3

    %5

    20.0

    %

    GR

    AN

    D C

    AN

    YON

    UN

    IV (

    107

    4)38

    8348

    3544

    .6%

    68.6

    31.1

    2161

    .9%

    1850

    .0%

    2330

    .4%

    2138

    .1%

    NO

    RTH

    ERN

    AZ

    UN

    IV (

    1082

    )91

    258

    149

    109

    51.6

    %72

    .328

    .370

    42.9

    %53

    67.9

    %58

    53.5

    %77

    46.8

    %

    THU

    ND

    ERB

    IRD

    SC

    H G

    LOB

    AL

    MG

    (1

    070)

    1229

    218

    65.5

    %76

    .140

    .87

    71.4

    %6

    83.3

    %10

    50.0

    %6

    66.7

    %

    UN

    IV A

    Z (1

    083

    )23

    364

    041

    522

    560

    .3%

    75.7

    27.2

    180

    50.0

    %14

    671

    .2%

    160

    60.6

    %15

    461

    .7%

    UN

    IV P

    HO

    ENIX

    (20

    988

    )58

    31,

    222

    692

    530

    31.3

    %63

    .638

    .330

    931

    .4%

    315

    27.6

    %30

    129

    .6%

    297

    36.7

    %

    WES

    TER

    N IN

    TL U

    NIV

    (2

    171

    5)18

    3819

    1934

    .2%

    65.0

    39.6

    650

    .0%

    1625

    .0%

    825

    .0%

    850

    .0%

    Ark

    ansa

    s

    AR

    ST

    UN

    IV (

    1090

    )66

    160

    7783

    39.4

    %66

    .629

    .246

    28.3

    %46

    41.3

    %32

    50.0

    %36

    41.7

    %

    AR

    TEC

    H U

    NIV

    (10

    89)

    3178

    4731

    47.4

    %70

    .629

    .916

    31.3

    %16

    56.3

    %20

    55.0

    %26

    46.2

    %

    HA

    RD

    ING

    UN

    IV (

    1097

    )60

    146

    7967

    48.0

    %70

    .125

    .932

    53.1

    %35

    57.1

    %42

    42.9

    %37

    40.5

    %

    HEN

    DER

    SON

    ST

    UN

    IV (

    1098

    )25

    6642

    2445

    .5%

    72.5

    29.9

    1450

    .0%

    1457

    .1%

    1560

    .0%

    2326

    .1%

    HEN

    DR

    IX C

    OLL

    (10

    99)

    1842

    2517

    28.6

    %63

    .924

    .69

    0.0%

    1040

    .0%

    1225

    .0%

    1145

    .5%

    JOH

    N B

    RO

    WN

    UN

    IV (

    110

    0)7

    199

    1063

    .2%

    75.6

    28.0

    837

    .5%

    475

    .0%

    410

    0.0%

    366

    .7%

    LYO

    N C

    OLL

    (10

    88)

    510

    73

    30.0

    %67

    .426

    .42

    50.0

    %3

    0.0%

    333

    .3%

    250

    .0%

    Ave

    rage

    Sco

    re

    Ca

    nd

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    FT

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    RE

    Tota

    l

    Per

    cen

    t

    Pas

    s

    Ave

    rage

    Age

    AU

    DB

    ECFA

    RR

    EG

    173

  • Ap

    pen

    dix

    A-1

    : A

    ll Te

    stin

    g Ev

    ents

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Secs

    % P

    ass

    Ave

    rage

    Sco

    re

    Ca

    nd

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    FT

    Tota

    l

    Secs

    RE

    Tota

    l

    Per

    cen

    t

    Pas

    s

    Ave

    rage

    Age

    AU

    DB

    ECFA

    RR

    EG

    OU

    AC

    HIT

    A B

    AP

    TIST

    UN

    IV (

    1102

    )33

    9262

    3044

    .6%

    72.5

    24.2

    2839

    .3%

    2254

    .6%

    2441

    .7%

    1844

    .4%

    SOU

    THER

    N A

    R U

    NIV

    (11

    07)

    1841

    1922

    14.6

    %58

    .530

    .310

    20.0

    %12

    8.3%

    1315

    .4%

    616

    .7%

    UN

    IV A

    R (

    110

    8)12

    335

    119

    615

    549

    .0%

    72.6

    26.7

    9247

    .8%

    7556

    .0%

    9644

    .8%

    8848

    .9%

    UN

    IV A

    R F

    OR

    T SM

    ITH

    (11

    10)

    1949

    3910

    55.1

    %71

    .928

    .111

    45.5

    %11

    72.7

    %11

    54.6

    %16

    50.0

    %

    UN

    IV A

    R L

    ITTL

    E R

    OC

    K (

    110

    1)48

    109

    5257

    41.3

    %70

    .032

    .031

    32.3

    %17

    47.1

    %31

    38.7

    %30

    50.0

    %

    UN

    IV A

    R M

    ON

    TIC

    ELLO

    (10

    85)

    1728

    1711

    28.6

    %56

    .330

    .16

    50.0

    %8

    12.5

    %7

    42.9

    %7

    14.3

    %

    UN

    IVER

    SITY

    OF

    CEN

    TRA

    L A

    RK

    AN

    SAS

    (109

    2)78

    194

    105

    8950

    .0%

    72.6

    28.1

    5147

    .1%

    4847

    .9%

    4447

    .7%

    5156

    .9%

    Cal

    ifo

    rnia

    AM

    ERIC

    AN

    RIV

    ER C

    OLL

    (12

    32)

    77

    52

    57.1

    %70

    .134

    .60

    0.0%

    333

    .3%

    250

    .0%

    210

    0.0%

    AZU

    SA P

    AC

    IFIC

    UN

    IV (

    1117

    )27

    6934

    3540

    .6%

    70.9

    27.8

    1637

    .5%

    1942

    .1%

    955

    .6%

    2536

    .0%

    BIO

    LA U

    NIV

    (11

    22)

    3797

    5443

    42.3

    %68

    .825

    .723

    52.2

    %22

    45.5

    %26

    42.3

    %26

    30.8

    %

    CA

    BA

    PTI

    ST U

    NIV

    (1

    125)

    1741

    2615

    26.8

    %64

    .026

    .58

    12.5

    %8

    37.5

    %10

    30.0

    %15

    26.7

    %

    CA

    LU

    THER

    AN

    UN

    IV (

    113

    3)

    3477

    2750

    37.7

    %66

    .932

    .119

    31.6

    %19

    52.6

    %19

    26.3

    %20

    40.0

    %

    CA

    ST

    PO

    LY U

    NIV

    PO

    MO

    NA

    (11

    44)

    210

    493

    242

    251

    36.5

    %66

    .729

    .712

    335

    .0%

    108

    39.8

    %12

    431

    .5%

    138

    39.9

    %

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV B

    AK

    ERSF

    IELD

    (79

    93)

    3910

    046

    5446

    .0%

    70.3

    31.7

    2937

    .9%

    2850

    .0%

    1861

    .1%

    2540

    .0%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV C

    HIC

    O (

    1146

    )10

    324

    112

    511

    646

    .1%

    72.0

    30.1

    5646

    .4%

    7250

    .0%

    5343

    .4%

    6043

    .3%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV E

    AST

    BA

    Y (1

    138)

    262

    573

    283

    290

    37.5

    %68

    .034

    .615

    339

    .2%

    135

    31.9

    %15

    643

    .0%

    129

    34.9

    %

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV F

    RES

    NO

    (11

    47)

    147

    377

    186

    191

    38.5

    %69

    .328

    .810

    239

    .2%

    9140

    .7%

    112

    27.7

    %72

    51.4

    %

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV F

    ULL

    ERTO

    N (

    113

    7)45

    81,

    162

    567

    595

    44.6

    %69

    .730

    .130

    942

    .7%

    285

    44.2

    %30

    242

    .1%

    266

    50.0

    %

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV L

    ON

    G B

    EAC

    H (

    1139

    )26

    361

    227

    333

    941

    .8%

    68.9

    30.1

    163

    37.4

    %12

    846

    .9%

    175

    37.7

    %14

    647

    .3%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV L

    OS

    AN

    GEL

    ES (

    1140

    )23

    456

    026

    129

    933

    .8%

    66.8

    32.6

    144

    32.6

    %14

    431

    .9%

    142

    30.3

    %13

    040

    .8%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV N

    OR

    THR

    IDG

    E (1

    153)

    426

    1,0

    8152

    855

    341

    .4%

    69.8

    31.6

    307

    37.8

    %27

    840

    .3%

    250

    37.6

    %24

    650

    .8%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV S

    AC

    RA

    MEN

    TO (

    1150

    )26

    366

    734

    732

    039

    .3%

    68.6

    30.8

    170

    42.9

    %14

    944

    .3%

    171

    37.4

    %17

    733

    .3%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV S

    AN

    MA

    RC

    OS

    (301

    13)

    7616

    798

    6943

    .7%

    71.3

    31.1

    4841

    .7%

    4139

    .0%

    4438

    .6%

    3458

    .8%

    CA

    ST

    UN

    IV S

    TAN

    ISLA

    US

    (115

    7)56

    123

    6360

    33.3

    %67

    .830

    .831

    38.7

    %20

    35.0

    %37

    37.8

    %35

    22.9

    %

    CA

    LIF

    PO

    LY S

    T U

    N S

    AN

    LU

    IS (

    1143

    )18

    748

    128

    319

    854

    .7%

    73.7

    25.5

    122

    50.0

    %11

    765

    .8%

    130

    43.9

    %11

    260

    .7%

    CA

    LIF

    ST U

    NIV

    DO

    MIN

    GU

    EZ H

    (11

    41)

    5212

    260

    6215

    .6%

    57.3

    37.2

    287.

    1%27

    22.2

    %37

    18.9

    %30

    13.3

    %

    CA

    LIF

    ST U

    NIV

    SA

    N B

    ERN

    AR

    D (

    114

    2)12

    631

    014

    716

    336

    .8%

    68.8

    31.0

    8836

    .4%

    7234

    .7%

    6930

    .4%

    8144

    .4%

    CH

    AP

    MA

    N U

    NIV

    (11

    64)

    8320

    512

    481

    47.8

    %72

    .226

    .545

    46.7

    %45

    53.3

    %61

    49.2

    %54

    42.6

    %

    CIT

    Y C

    OLL

    EGE

    OF

    SAN

    FR

    AN

    CIS

    CO

    (11

    1167

    )5

    138

    530

    .8%

    71.8

    35.0

    110

    0.0%

    333

    .3%

    425

    .0%

    520

    .0%

    CLA

    REM

    ON

    T M

    CK

    ENN

    A C

    OLL

    (11

    70)

    2871

    6110

    74.7

    %79

    .824

    .217

    64.7

    %18

    83.3

    %18

    83.3

    %18

    66.7

    %

    CO

    AST

    LIN

    E C

    C (

    2063

    5)5

    138

    561

    .5%

    74.3

    28.6

    560

    .0%

    366

    .7%

    366

    .7%

    250

    .0%

    CO

    NC

    OR

    DIA

    UN

    IV (

    207

    05)

    1440

    1624

    32.5

    %69

    .626

    .913

    38.5

    %9

    33.3

    %10

    20.0

    %8

    37.5

    %

    DE

    AN

    ZA C

    OLL

    (44

    80)

    1949

    3316

    63.3

    %73

    .237

    .211

    45.5

    %11

    63.6

    %14

    71.4

    %13

    69.2

    %

    DEV

    RY

    UN

    IV L

    ON

    G B

    EAC

    H (

    6669

    88)

    2034

    2014

    23.5

    %59

    .336

    .511

    18.2

    %6

    16.7

    %9

    33.3

    %8

    25.0

    %

    DEV

    RY

    UN

    IV P

    OM

    ON

    A (

    233

    29)

    2148

    2919

    14.6

    %58

    .836

    .113

    30.8

    %10

    0.0%

    1020

    .0%

    156.

    7%

    DIA

    BLO

    VA

    LLEY

    CO

    LL (

    1191

    )8

    2314

    939

    .1%

    69.6

    32.9

    742

    .9%

    742

    .9%

    540

    .0%

    425

    .0%

    EL C

    AM

    INO

    CO

    LL (

    119

    7)

    59

    45


Recommended