+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5...

Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5...

Date post: 30-Mar-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
8
Jorge M. Fonseca Dec. 18, 2013 Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction Ideas for Investments
Transcript
Page 1: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Jorge M. Fonseca – Dec. 18, 2013

Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division

Targeting Food Losses

and Waste Reduction

Ideas for Investments

Page 2: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

870 million people in hunger

9.1 billion to be fed in 2050

2 billion without adequate nutrients

1.3 billion tons are wasted About 1/3 never reaches end of supply chain in developing countries – 1/3 of all food is

discarded by end user in developed countries

“Zero Hunger Challenge”

Deficit/Challenges- Missed opportunity- Response

Page 3: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Commissioned FAO work attracted

worldwide attention

Food losses and waste by world region

Page 4: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Global Initiative on Food Losses and

Waste Reduction

The basic pillars of Save Food

1 Awareness raising on the impact of, and solutions for food loss and waste.

2 Collaboration and coordination of world-wide initiatives on food loss and waste reduction.

3 Support to investment programmes and

projects, implemented by private and public sectors.

4 Policy, strategy and programme development for food loss and waste reduction.

Page 6: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Lack of cold chain

capacity results in

food losses

Needs for investment:

• More information on cold

capacity - Central Asia, Africa -

• Improvement or development

of cold chains – across the

developing world-

Country

Persons/m3 cold

chain capacity

USA 2.9

Germany 3.7

Chile 4.2

Spain 5.7

South Korea 7.0

France 7.7

Panama 7.7

Russia 8.6

India 11.3

Greece 12.0

Costa Rica 13.1

Portugal 13.5

Guatemala 18.4

El Salvador 26.4

Mexico 27.9

Brazil 35.6

Peru 69.6

Venezuela 79.0

Argentina 83.5

China 89.1

South Africa 111.4

Colombia 497.0

Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013

Estimated 2010 population

density per cubic meter of cold

chain capacity in selected countries

Page 7: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Logistics Systems Appraisals: findings and

recommendations in many areas

Needs for improvement in LAC and SSA regions are urgent in:

• Infrastructure and

transportation

• Information and

communication technology

• Human capital & logistic

management

• Postharvest systems

• Policy framework

Page 8: Targeting Food Losses and Waste Reduction · Brazil 35.6 Peru 69.6 Venezuela 79.0 Argentina 83.5 China 89.1 South Africa 111.4 Colombia 497.0 Source: Fonseca & Njie, 2013 Estimated

Umbrella program of SAVE FOOD:

Support must be tailored to target Food Losses

• More information needed

on «hot spots» where the

highest impact for

reduction can be made

• Training can play a mayor

role; significant benefits

from P/P partnerships

• Different crops present

different challenges; also

location

Food Waste

• Awareness may play an

important factor

• Policies to promote

donations (e.g. reduction

of liability and tax

benefits) appear to help

• Regulation of labeling;

support to sustainable

«life cycle of food» can

add to effort


Recommended