Task Force on Establishment of European set of Labour ... · 10 AVEIRO Intermediate 2,9 37,5 59,6...

Unit for the Coordination of Territorial Statistics

August 2018

Task Force on Establishment of European set of Labour Market Areas

Preliminary Analysis and Results

Overview

3 | Regional Urban-Rural Typology Matrixes

2 | Statistics and Analysis on Regional Urban-Rural Typology

4 | Sensitive Analysis

1 | Final LMA Geography and comparison with other geographies

5 | Main findings

Goals

• Study the urban-rural linkages considering the Regional Urban-Rural Typology • Set a framework of study areas based on the preliminary analysis and types of territories • Investigate the use of different parameters to define LMA depending on the types of territories through sensitive and comparability analysis • Evaluate a set of metropolitan and non-metropolitan parameters

0 50 km

LAU 1

Territorial Limits

NUTS III

EU LMA(e.g. Faro)

1| Final LMA Geography and comparison with other geographies

NUTS 3 (2013)

Coimbra

Porto

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Lisboa

LAU 1

Territorial Limits

FUA

EU LMA(e.g. Faro)

Functional Urban Areas (FUA)

BEJA

SINES

ÉVORA

VISEU

BRAGANÇA

LISBOA

TOMAR

GUARDA

FARO

VILA REAL

LEIRIA

COIMBRA

PORTALEGRESANTARÉM

CASTELO BRANCO

AVEIRO

BRAGA

LAMEGO

PORTIMÃO

ALCOBAÇA

GUIMARÃES

VIANA DO CASTELO

PORTO PAREDES

SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA

0 50 km

Cities

> 100 000

] 50 000 ; 100 000 ]

[ 0 ; 50 000 ]

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Portuguese Cities, 2011

2 | Statistics and Analysis on Regional Urban-Rural Typology COMPARATIVE STATISTICAL INDICATORS BETWEEN REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGIES (LAU 1)

Typology PTRUR PTINT PTURB PT

Nr. of territorial units (t.u.) 191 52 35 278

Surface (km2)

Min 14 25 8 8

Max 1 721 764 465 1 721

Average 381 216 144 320

Median 279 182 128 229

SD 311 153 111 284

CV (%) 82 71 77 89

Resident Population

(inhab.)

Min 1 834 2 917 17 569 1 834

Max 143 396 181 494 547 733 547 733

Average 17 677 40 190 130 897 36 143

Median 10 537 26 582 93 858 15 700

SD 20 186 37 760 109 626 58 222

CV (%) 114 94 84 161

Employed Resident

Population (Workers)

Min 607 829 7 781 607

Max 60 993 78 779 222 202 222 202 Average 6 526 15 998 54 142 14 293

Median 3 708 10 566 38 432 5 433

SD 8 344 16 391 45 210 24 308

CV (%) 128 102 84 170

Employment (Jobs)

Min 635 853 6 873 635

Max 74 539 82 923 509 123 509 123

Average 6 423 15 759 55 060 14 293 Median 3 276 9 639 30 251 4 834

SD 8 977 17 426 86 078 35 690

CV (%) 140 111 156 250

Employed resident population

working in the territorial unit

Min 563 729 3 225 563

Max 52 361 65 209 185 140 185 140

Average 5 124 12 193 30 288 9 615

Median 2 700 7 259 22 335 3 876

SD 7 019 13 555 32 541 16 333

CV (%) 137 111 107 170

Typology PTRUR PTINT PTURB PT

Nr. of territorial units (t.u.) 191 52 35 278

SC Demand Side Indicator

Min 41 61 35 35

Max 94 89 84 94

Average 80 79 64 78

Median 82 80 69 80

SD 9 6 14 10

CV (%) 11 8 21 13

SC Supply Side Indicator

Min 38 57 34 34

Max 95 88 83 95

Average 78 74 55 74

Median 80 75 53 77

SD 12 10 13 14

CV (%) 15 13 24 18

Rural Areas - 68,7% of LAU 1 - 81,7% of total surface - In average, 77,6% of the rural employed population lives and works in the same territorial unit (LAU 1) - High levels of self-containment indicators (more employed population works and lives in the same LAU 1)

Urban Areas - 12,6% of LAU1 - 5,7% of total surface - In average, 55,2% of the urban employed population lives and works in the same territorial unit - More mobility between LAU 1 comparing to rural areas

2 | Statistics and Analysis on Regional Urban-Rural Typology REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY AND FINAL LMA GEOGRAPHY

LMA LMA Name Typology LAU1 Workers Density

(per km2) Jobs Density

(per km2) Emp_live_work

Density (per km2) SC demand side

indicator SC supply side

indicator

10 AVEIRO Intermediate 10 8 448 8 648 6 002 72,5 67,6

10 AVEIRO Rural 1 3 602 250 200 80,2 69,3

19 SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA Intermediate 3 6 526 1 971 1 457 78,9 69,4 19 SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA Urban 6 14 466 8 051 5 705 68,0 67,9 24 BEJA Rural 13 528 2 952 2 468 83,7 81,2

36 BRAGA Intermediate 8 11 243 11 306 9 068 79,8 72,5

41 GUIMARÃES Intermediate 7 15 549 12 283 9 797 81,1 76,9

41 GUIMARÃES Urban 2 21 703 2 869 1 910 64,9 64,0

49 BRAGANÇA Rural 13 661 3 063 2 718 88,2 90,5

62 CASTELO BRANCO Rural 10 1 005 3 974 3 468 81,5 85,4

73 COIMBRA Rural 13 5 511 9 696 7 158 76,0 62,1 92 ÉVORA Rural 10 868 3 416 2 819 83,3 78,0

101 PORTALEGRE Rural 17 740 3 019 2 518 82,3 80,0 106 FARO Intermediate 8 3 516 6 366 4 936 80,1 74,9

112 PORTIMÃO Intermediate 8 3 732 5 347 4 199 80,4 79,0

124 GUARDA Rural 10 880 2 500 2 114 83,3 85,1

137 ALCOBAÇA Rural 8 6 033 5 065 4 015 77,6 71,4 140 LEIRIA Rural 8 5 283 8 709 6 792 76,1 74,1

153 LISBOA Rural 6 5 149 5 024 3 651 68,4 60,4

153 LISBOA Urban 18 39 524 78 418 40 931 63,1 48,7

182 PORTO Urban 8 63 155 33 446 18 614 62,7 56,9

187 PAREDES Intermediate 5 12 217 6 515 5 069 78,3 72,7

187 PAREDES Urban 1 21 949 1 930 1 444 74,8 64,9

197 TOMAR Rural 14 1 260 3 500 2 848 78,7 78,4

212 SANTARÉM Rural 13 2 686 6 351 4 653 72,9 63,6 226 SINES Rural 5 728 2 595 2 030 80,8 82,8

239 VIANA DO CASTELO Rural 10 3 842 5 487 4 473 80,5 79,0

254 VILA REAL Intermediate 1 1 212 134 109 81,6 80,8

254 VILA REAL Rural 10 1 424 3 718 3 212 86,0 87,4

259 LAMEGO Intermediate 2 2 765 463 396 86,1 75,3

259 LAMEGO Rural 11 2 142 2 117 1 733 82,2 80,4 277 VISEU Rural 19 2 602 7 959 6 469 79,1 76,9


REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY AND FINAL LMA GEOGRAPHY

BEJA

SINES

ÉVORA

VISEU

LISBOA

BRAGANÇA

TOMAR

FARO

GUARDA

PORTALEGRE

VILA REAL

LEIRIA

COIMBRA

LAMEGO

SANTARÉM

CASTELO BRANCO

AVEIRO

BRAGA

PORTIMÃO

ALCOBAÇA

GUIMARÃES

PORTO

VIANA DOCASTELO

PAREDES

SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA

0 50 km

Urban

Intermediate

Rural

Urban and Rural Regional Typology

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Regional Typology and Final LMA

0 50 km

] 85 ; 95 ]

] 75 ; 85 ]

] 60 ; 75 ]

] 35 : 60 ]

%

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Demand Side Self-Containment (LAU1) and Final LMA

0 50 km

] 85 ; 95 ]

] 75 ; 85 ]

] 60 ; 75 ]

] 34 ; 60 ]

%

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Supply Side Self-Containment (LAU1) and Final LMA


REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY AND FINAL LMA GEOGRAPHY

- 56% of the LMA have LAU 1 in rural regions

- Only 1 out of the 25 LMA has LAU 1 which intersect exclusively with urban region (Porto), because this LMA is

smaller than Porto Metropolitan Area

- 12% of the LMA have LAU 1 in urban and intermediate regions (no rural regions)

- Only the LMA of Lisboa has LAU 1 in urban and rural regions (no intermediate regions)

- The LMA which intersect exclusively with rural regions, especially the ones located in the inland regions of

Mainland Portugal have the lowest levels of workers density (employed population working in rural areas)

- The LMA which intersect with rural regions have higher levels of self-containment: more employed population

lives and works in LAU 1 of the same typology

- The lowest levels of self-containment are in the LMA which intersect with urban regions (high mobility

between urban LAU 1)


PROPORTION OF EMPLOYED POPULATION WORKING PER ECONOMIC SECTOR, 2011

LMA LMA Name Typology Primary sector

Secondary sector

Tertiary sector

10 AVEIRO Intermediate 2,9 37,5 59,6 10 AVEIRO Rural 8,3 27,6 64,1

19 SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA Intermediate 2,6 42,9 54,4 19 SANTA MARIA DA FEIRA Urban 1,3 47,7 51,0

24 BEJA Rural 12,3 18,8 68,9 36 BRAGA Intermediate 2,5 39,4 58,1 41 GUIMARÃES Intermediate 1,4 51,7 46,9 41 GUIMARÃES Urban 1,2 48,5 50,3

49 BRAGANÇA Rural 12,5 18,7 68,7 62 CASTELO BRANCO Rural 4,2 27,2 68,6

73 COIMBRA Rural 2,4 22,9 74,7 92 ÉVORA Rural 9,1 20,1 70,8

101 PORTALEGRE Rural 9,1 20,2 70,8 106 FARO Intermediate 3,8 16,4 79,7

112 PORTIMÃO Intermediate 2,7 15,7 81,6 124 GUARDA Rural 7,3 22,7 70,0

137 ALCOBAÇA Rural 7,4 27,4 65,2 140 LEIRIA Rural 1,9 37,5 60,6

153 LISBOA Rural 4,6 25,9 69,5 153 LISBOA Urban 0,7 16,6 82,7

182 PORTO Urban 1,3 23,8 74,9 187 PAREDES Intermediate 1,6 51,0 47,4

187 PAREDES Urban 1,1 45,7 53,1 197 TOMAR Rural 5,2 27,3 67,5

212 SANTARÉM Rural 6,1 24,8 69,1

226 SINES Rural 11,7 24,8 63,5 239 VIANA DO CASTELO Rural 3,9 34,8 61,3

254 VILA REAL Intermediate 9,0 29,9 61,1 254 VILA REAL Rural 11,0 19,8 69,2

259 LAMEGO Intermediate 9,7 38,6 51,6 259 LAMEGO Rural 16,2 21,5 62,3

277 VISEU Rural 4,5 30,6 64,9

- The LMA which intersect with rural regions

are situated in the north inner territory and

NUTS 2 Alentejo have higher representation

of the primary sector (between 9% and

16,2%)

- The employment in the secondary sector

was more important in LMA which intersect

with urban and intermediate regions (Santa

Maria da Feira, Guimarães and Paredes),

surrounding the LMA of Porto (almost 50%)

- The tertiary sector is more significant in

the LMA which intersect with urban regions

(Lisboa and Porto) and with the

intermediate regions (Faro and Portimão),

situated in NUTS 2 Algarve


COMMUTING MATRIXES ACCORDING TO REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY BY LAU 1

Flows of employed population according to Regional Urban-Rural Typology by LAU 1, 2011

- Concerning internal flows (flows between the same LAU 1), 65,5% of the rural employed

population and 38,4% of the urban employed population lives and works in the same LAU 1

- External flows (in and out flows) are more significant in urban LAU 1 (31,4% and 30,2%

respectively) compared to intermediate and rural LAU 1 – more mobility in urban LAU 1

LAU 1 Matrix

% Internal Flows % In Flows % Out Flows % Total Flows

% Employed Population




Urban 38,4 31,4 30,2 100

Intermediate 62,3 18,2 19,4 100

Rural 65,5 16,6 17,9 100


REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY IN COMMUTING MATRIX

- Almost 49% of employed population works in urban LAU 1, of which 46,2% lives and works in urban

LAU 1

- Almost 31% of employed population lives in rural LAU 1, of which 29,9% lives and works in rural LAU 1

- Concerning the flows between different typologies, the flows between intermediate LAU 1 and urban

LAU 1 represent the highest proportion of employed population: 1,2%

Proportion of employed population in commuting matrix according to Regional Urban-Rural Typology, 2011

From/To Urban Intermediate Rural Total

Urban 46,2 0,9 0,6 47,7

Intermediate 1,2 19,4 0,4 20,9

Rural 1,1 0,3 29,9 31,4

Total 48,5 20,6 30,9 100

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

Study Area

LAU 1

Porto Metropolitan

Territory

Lisboa Metropolitan

Territory

Algarve

RuralTerritories

AltoMinho


Intermediate

Rural

Urban

NUTS III


STUDY AREAS BASED ON REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY

NUTS3 and Regional Urban-Rural Typology

Douro

Algarve

Baixo Alentejo

Alto Alentejo

Alentejo Central

Beira Baixa

Ave

Oeste

Alentejo Litoral

Médio Tejo

Lezíria do Tejo

Beiras e Serra da Estrela

Alto Tâmega

Região de Coimbra

Terras de Trás-os-Montes

Alto Minho

ViseuDão

Lafões

Cávado

Região de Leiria

Tâmega e Sousa

Região de

Aveiro

AMP

AML

0 50 km

Urban

Intermediate

Rural


Territorial Limits

LAU 1

NUTS III

Study Areas and Regional Urban-Rural Typology

Study Areas:

1. Lisboa Metropolitan Territory

2. Porto Metropolitan Territory

3. Rural Territory 4. Algarve 5. Alto Minho

The study area of Alto Minho was chosen because of its non spatial contiguity with other rural territories Sensitive analysis were conducted in two scenarios/study areas: • Alto Minho separated

with other rural regions • Alto Minho with other

rural regions

STUDY AREAS BASED ON REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY (RURAL REGIONS VS ALTO MINHO)

minSZ minSC tarSZ tarSC No. LMA

5 000 0.80 35 000 0.85 45

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Rural Regions

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1


5 000 0.80 35 000 0.85 5

Alto Minho


35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 13

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

Rural Regions

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1


35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 1


STUDY AREAS BASED ON REGIONAL URBAN-RURAL TYPOLOGY

1. Lisboa Metropolitan Territory

• Lisboa Metropolitan Area + 2 Rural Regions (Oeste and Lezíria do Tejo)

2. Porto Metropolitan Territory

• Hypothesis 1: Porto Metropolitan Area • Hypothesis 2: : Porto Metropolitan Area + 4

Intermediate Regions (Cávado, Ave, Tâmega e Sousa and Região de Aveiro)

3. Rural Territories

• 14 Rural Regions

4. Algarve • 1 Intermediate Region

Based on previous results it was concluded that despite setting high or low values on the parameters, the number of LMA in Alto Minho it is the same for both scenarios. So it were defined 4 study areas:

Final Study Areas

Concerning the two scenarios for Porto Metropolitan Territory, tests were conducted for both territories for comparability reasons at metropolitan level

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

Study Area

LAU 1

Porto Metropolitan

Territory

Lisboa Metropolitan

Territory

Algarve

RuralTerritories


Intermediate

Rural

Urban

NUTS III


STUDY AREAS CHARACTERISTICS


Study Areas characteristics

Study Area Nº

LAU 1 % Employed Population

Self-containment by LAU 1

Demand Side Supply Side Lisboa Metropolitan

Territory 41 36,0 56,0 56,3

Porto Metropolitan Territory

(Hypothesis 1) 17 17,8 59,8 60,4

Porto Metropolitan Territory

(Hypothesis 2) 53 34,2 68,0 67,7

Rural Territories 168 25,3 80,5 80,4

Algarve 16 4,5 78,0 78,2

PARAMETERIZATION SCENARIOS

4| Sensitive Analysis

Three parameterization scenarios: 1 - Scenario based on the LMA final geography parameters: 2 - Scenario based on parameters adjusted to metropolitan territories: depicting internal organization of metropolitan territories

- high levels of functional integration - lower size and self-containment values

3 – Scenario based on parameters adjusted to non-metropolitan territories: defining functional urban regions - high levels of self-containment at LAU 1 - over evaluate size and self-containment values

• Several tests were conducted but only one result was selected for each scenario

minSZ minSC tarSZ tarSC

35 000 0.80 100 000 0.85


LISBOA METROPOLITAN TERRITORY

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3


35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 3

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1


35 000 0.80 100 000 0.85 3


2 000 0.70 10 000 0.75 15

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA


PORTO METROPOLITAN TERRITORY (HYPOTHESIS 1)



35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 3


35 000 0.80 100 000 0.85 2


2 000 0.70 10 000 0.75 8

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA


PORTO METROPOLITAN TERRITORY (HYPOTHESIS 2)



35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 10


35 000 0.80 100 000 0.85 10


2 000 0.70 10 000 0.75 29

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA

0 10 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA


RURAL TERRITORIES



35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 13


35 000 0.80 100 000 0.85 14


2 000 0.70 10 000 0.75 29

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1

LMA

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA

0 50 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA


ALGARVE

Scenario 1 Scenario 2

Scenario 3


35 000 0.80 70 000 0.85 2


35 000 0.80 100 000 0,85 2


2 000 0.70 10 000 0.75 8

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LMA

LAU 1

0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA 0 5 km

Territorial Limits

LAU 1LMA

5 | Main findings

- Scenario 3 results, based on parameters adjusted to non-metropolitan territories – functional urban

regions approach – are similar to the results of Scenario 1 – LMA final geography (Eurostat Grant).

- Scenario 2, based on parameters adjusted to metropolitan territories – depicting internal organization of

metropolitan territories – applied to non-metropolitan territories ensure high levels of functional integration

in rural regions, meaning, in the Portuguese context, a high number of LMA with one single LAU 1: 48 LMA –

51,6%...

- Following our analysis and tests:

Should a specific set of parameters be defined according to the type of territory U/R

OR

should a hierarchical system of LMA be defined according to size and functional integration?

- The Algarve study area (intermediate region) is a good example on how this hierarchical system may work

Unit for the Coordination of Territorial Statistics

August 2018

Task Force on Establishment of European set of Labour Market Areas

Preliminary Analysis and Results

Date post:	23-May-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	7 times
Download:	0 times

Task Force on Establishment of European set of Labour ... · 10 AVEIRO Intermediate 2,9 37,5 59,6...

Documents