+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

Date post: 01-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
TC6 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OF UNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES FIT PROJECT TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CONTRACT NO. 68-01-6692 Preliminary Assessment Report of Tattle Street Landfill Tuttle Street and S.W. 14th Street Des Moines, Iowa Technical Directive Document No. R-07-8304-03 November 14, 1983 Prepared by: John Caoile and Sharon Martin >t ' .; S00101764 SUPERFUND RECORDS ecology and environment, inc. Internaticxva' Specialists in the Environmental Sciences DB004595 O6J1OO
Transcript
Page 1: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

TC6

FIELD INVESTIGATIONS OFUNCONTROLLED HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES

FIT PROJECT

TASK REPORT TO THEENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

CONTRACT NO. 68-01-6692

Pre l imina ry Assessment Report ofTattle Street L a n d f i l l

Tuttle Street and S .W. 14th StreetDes Moines, Iowa

Technical Directive Document No. R-07-8304-03

November 14, 1983

Prepared by:John Caoile and Sharon Martin>t • ' .;

S00101764SUPERFUND RECORDS

ecology and environment, inc.Internaticxva' Specialists in the Environmental Sciences

DB004595

O6J1OO

Page 2: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1

SECTION 2: SITE HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-1

SECTION 3: RECEPTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1

SECTION 4: PATHWAYS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-1

SECTION 5: WASTE CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . .5-1

SECTION 6: WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES . . . . . . . . . . .6-1

SECTION 7: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....... .7-1

SECTION 8: REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8-1

APPENDIX

EPA Potential Hazardous Waste Site Identificationand Preliminary Assessment form (2070-2) . . . . . . .A-l

Rating Form for Waste Disposal Site . . . . . . . . . .A-6

Nomograph for the Appropriate Level of Response . . . .A-8

Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .A-9

11

DB004596

Page 3: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a preliminary

assessment of the old Tuttle Street Landfill in Des Moines,

Iowa. The purpose of this study was to determine by file

search, interviews and site inspection if this site poses a

potential threat to the environment as a result of waste or

leachate migration. Due to several factors including, the

close proximity of this landfill to the Des Moines Water-

works intake gallery system and the Dico Company, this site

was suspected in previous studies by the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA), the Iowa Department of Water,

Air, and Waste Management [formerly the Iowa Department of

Environmental Quality (IDEQ)] and the Des Moines Waterworks

(DMWW) as a potential contributing source to the documented

volatile organic contamination occurring in the groundwater

of the area.

This task was authorized by the USEPA under Technical

Directive Document (TDD) No. R-7-8304-03 on April 11, 1983.

As part of this task we were asked to perform a preliminary

assessment of this site using former DICO studies as back-

ground. Therefore, some of the background information for

this report is derived from work performed under TDD No.

R-07-8101-7D.

DB004597

Page 4: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 2: SITE HISTORY

The Tuttle Street Landfill is located in the area of

S.W. 14th and Tuttle Streets in Des Moines, Iowa (see Figure

2-1). It is within the Central Des Moines Industrial Park

plat occupying predominantly lots 2,3,4,6,7,8 and 9 (E cen-

tral, sec. 8 and W central, sec. 9, T. 78 N., R. 24 W., Des

Moines SW, Iowa Quadrangle, see Figure 2-2) . The area is

presently owned by the various companies and individuals

shown in Table 2-1.

In past investigations by EPA and IDEQ concerning the

trichloroethylene (TCE) and vinyl chloride contamination of

the groundwater in the area of the DMWW north infiltration

gallery, several sources for this contamination were postu-

lated. Two of those sources were old landfills; one land-

fill is located on property owned by the DICO company (DICO)

and the other landfill is located in the vicinity of Tuttle

Street. The groundwater in the area of DICO has been in-

vestigated and is presently being monitored by the Field

Investigation Team (FIT) (TDD Nos. R-7-8101-7D and

R-7-8302-02) . Another of the nearby potential historical

waste generators for these contaminants may be an aircraft

plant located in what is now the Des Moines Vocational

School at the north end of the Fleur Drive bridge. (A pre-

liminary assessment for this site is also being prepared,

2-1 DB004598

Page 5: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

• W ISth STREET

MOUNDS «PORTER

KNUOSON CON8TRUCTIOICOMPANY

,MERCHANT*WAREHOUSE

TUTTLE STREET

ORAVELROAD

DUMPEDRUBBLE

OVERFLOWCHANNEL

PONDED DITCHPONDED DITCH

C LEVEE •

RACCOON RIVER

ISCHARQE VA

Figure 2-1. Sketch map of Tuttle Street landfill area(now Central Industrial Park).

2-2 DB004599

Page 6: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

Land2-1

in Central Des Maines Industrial BackQrTETtoner Parcel no.

Bock andpagerp.

Purchasedate

Previewsoner

toiU)

OO

Iowa Power &LiightPeter F. andRuanary /tri

Peter F. PadJoseph. D. Peri

Estate or TrustFrank A. tei TrustFrank Pactm Cb.

(Ctntract)Jbsech N.Chamberlain

Rxnds & Portermiter Cb.

FM.& anCb.

Transfierand Stzxage (I£D)FJft. Httr>11& ScnCb.Das Maines Lhim

Cb.Des MDires Uhicn

Cb.

lot 1

00169-(XG-OCa 5099-977 The Nxth 130 fieet en the east line June 1, 1981and the north 269.46 fieet en thevest line of let 2

fen ttrxlesaleCtcwery Cb.

00169-002-001 5217-73

5220-476

Boasting the north 130 fieet en theeast line and the north 259.46 feeten the west line, let 2

0169-003-001 4647-886 Krth 360 fieet en the wast line and Ftouary 2, 1976 Fcank Raxtanthe north 249.2 fieet en the east Onpanylinecf lot 3

00169-003-002 4644-163 Excepting the north 360 fiaet en the February 2, 1976 Frank Rasterwast line and the north 249.2 fieet Cbipenyen the east line, t 3

00169-004-000 4772-501 let 4

3932-463

00169-005-000 4772-501 let 5

00169-006-000 let 6

January 31, 1978 Das MainesTerminal Cb.

flfril 4, 1968

January 31, 1978 Das MinesTerminal Cb.

00169-007-000 let 7

Paxtcn luitaer Cb. 00169-008-000 let 8Des Madras Ihicn 00169-009-000 let 9Railway Cb.

From Develc/. . . j . — .*- /pnent Planning and Research Associates, Inc. (HBA) report-V«^P»%- W \ Jb \^^TY~/y ^*- VA Av '_*- J ^_ Tf £

3, IA, RgprBible Party Search", May

Page 7: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

DES MOINES SW, IOWASW/4 DES MOINES 15 QUADRANGLE

N4130—W9337 5 / 7 5

1956

PHOTOREVISED 1967. 1971. AND 1976

SCALE 124000o

1000 6000 7000 FEET

) HH.OMCTE*

Figure 2-2

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

Topographic map showing location of theTuttle Street landfill area (at arrow)

2-4

CM1 MILt

DB004601

Page 8: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

under TDD No. R-7-8306-08) .

According to interviews with Mr. Bud Hoffman, a former

supervisor at Solar Aircraft for a plant section using TCE,

the solvent sludges were not hauled to the Tuttle Street

landfill but to the city landfill at Maury Street and SE

16th Street on the Des Moines River when the plant was in

operation from about 1945 to 1951.

According to discussions with Robert Beers (Hubbell

Realty, President), Hubbell Realty owned the Tuttle Street

landfill during the time of its operation in the mid-1950's

until 1963 or 1965. He indicated it was a private landfill

and they allowed only clay, rock and construction debris to

be disposed there. The landfill was operated for Hubbell

Realty by Mr. Jessie Veach whose last known location was in

the vicinity of 6th and Scott Street in Des Moines.

Much"of the property was sold in 1965 to the Des Moines

Union Railroad (DMURR). Mr. Beers indicated that debris

fill was hauled in at a much faster rate following the

sale. As reported in a telephone conversation with Mr.

Cook, the auditor for the DMURR, the low areas were filled

with construction debris, mainly in the southwest area of

the site.

At the Tuttle Street Landfill, the exact areas filled

are not documented other than that which can be ascertained

from historical aerial photographs. it can be observed from

aerial photographs taken in 1956 by the Corps of Engineers

2-5DB004602

Page 9: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

that much of the dumping was done in the northeast portions

of the site both north and south of Tuttle Street. The

portion of the landfill north of Tuttle Street has been

under development with several light warehouse buildings

being constructed there.

The site was inspected on June 14, 1983 by John Caoile

and Jim Jackson of the Region 7 FIT of Ecology and Environ-

ment, Inc. The area inspected was essentially that shown in

Figure 2-1, but efforts were concentrated in the undeveloped

area bounded by Tuttle Street, the DICO Plant, the Des

Moines Union Railroad tracks, and the levee.

During the inspection, construction debris was observed

on the ground, in railroad cuts along the levee and occur-

ring as scattered piles (see Figure 2-1 and photographs in

the Appendix). There were no tanks, drums or other contain-

ers visible during this inspection. Therefore, if any con-

tainerized wastes are present, the containers are most like-

ly buried.

The site occurs adjacent to the DICO plant which has

been identified as a probable source of TCE contamination in

the groundwater that is the drinking water supply for Des

Moines. As will be discussed further, however, some

evidence exists that DICO may not be the only source of this

contamination and that the Tuttle Street landfill may be a

location where TCE and other contaminants have been placed

in the past.

2-6DB004603

Page 10: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 3: RECEPTORS

The site is located in the southwest bottomlands adja-

cent to the downtown area of the City of Des Moines, Iowa.

The area of the Tuttle Street landfill is zoned "M-2" or

heavy industrial according to the Des Moines Planning and

Zoning Department. Therefore, no persons occupy residences

in the area; however, daytime work force population is per-

haps as much as 1,000, as estimated from aerial photographs,

for a 1,000 foot perimeter surrounding the site.

The distances to the nearest off-site buildings is zero

since commercial buildings were contructed over areas of the

landfill itself. These companies are Paxton Lumber, Rounds

and Porter, Inc. and Merchants Warehouse. It is unknown

whether any landfilled material was removed in the con-

struction of these buildings.

The water supply for the City of Des Moines is obtained

from an infiltration gallery system (48" diameter horizontal

conduits). The north gallery is located on the west side of

the Raccoon river in the river alluvium and is approximately

1/4 mile west of the west edge of the Tuttle Street landfill

area (See Figure 2-2). The DMWW plant is located approxi-

mately 1/2 mile southwest of the site. TCE contamination

has been detected in Jao h of tlvese water sources.\\ v

No critical environments are located within three miles

3-1 DB004604

Page 11: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

of this site. However, several city parks and naturally

forested plots occur within this area.

3-2DB004605

Page 12: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 4: PATHWAYS

Before discussing the potential role of the Tuttle

Street Landfill in contributing to the contamination of the

area, the existing problem needs to be discussed. Tri-

chloroethylene (TCE) has been detected in the finished water

at the Des Moines Water Works since December 11, 1974. In

March, 1975, 80 ppb (ug/1) TCE was detected by IDEQ. EPA

studies in March, 1976, during the National Organic Monitor-

ing Survey revealed TCE concentration of 32-56 ppb. Cooper-

ative work between the two agencies disclosed that the TCE

contamination was derived through the infiltration gallery

system with highest concentrations in the north gallery.

Table 4-1 shows the most recently available analytical

data for samples taken by the FIT in June, 1983 from the Des

Moines Waterworks. TCE was again found in greatest concen-

tration in the gallery system. Bromodichloromethane, di-

bromochloromethane, and chloroform have not previously beenv.:,r *""

detected in waters from the **BWW and their source is un-

known. These three compounds also were not detected in sam-

ples collected from monitoring wells located on DICO proper-

ty and near the north gallery. The following metals and

organic compounds are among those analyzed for, but whose

presence was not detected in the DMWW samples: aluminum,

chromium, barium, cadmium, copper, zinc, arsenic, mer-

4-1 DB004606

Page 13: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

TABLE 4.1Water Analyses

Des Moines Water WorksJune, 1983

.uIKJ

PPbFinish WaterLaboratory

Finish WaterWest High Lift

Raw WaterEast Low Lift

Raw WaterNorth Gallery

IronLeadManganeseBoronTrichloroethylene1 ,2-transdichloroethyleneBromodichlorome thaneDibromochlorome thaneChloroform

64NDNDND34542

12

5865

NDND163217

94ND97ND39NDNDND7

96ND9212026043NDNDND

TDD NO. R-7-8302-02

Oo

ND = not detected

o

Page 14: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

cury, nickel, vinyl chloride, methylene chloride,

1,1-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethane, . benzene, and

1,1,1-trichloroethane. These constituents, however, have

been detected in water from the previously mentioned

monitoring wells (See Table 4-2).

Much of the TCE (and many of the other contaminants)

identified in waters near the DMWW are also present in the

degreasing sludges sampled at DICO (located immediately west

of the Tuttle Street landfill area). Table 4-2 shows the

most recently available analytical data for groundwater

sampling in the DICO area. Values are in micrograms per

TABLE 4.2DICO

Quarterly Groundwater AnalysisJune, 1983

Range (ppb)

AluminumChromiumBariumCadmiumCopperIronLeadManganeseZincBoronArsenicMercuryNickelTrichloroethyleneTrans 1 ,2-dichloroethyleneVinyl chlorideMethylene chloride1 , 1-dichloroethene1 ,1 ,1-trichloroethane1 , 2-dichloroethanebenzene

ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -468 -ND -102 -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -ND -

25,100604687

9452,100

716,870250

1,430210

1298608802605

34422

.2

.7

TDD No. R-7-8302-02

ND = not determined

4-3DB004608

Page 15: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

milliliter (ug/1) (approximately equal to ppb) for the 11

wells in this area. Trichloroethylene, trans

1,2-dichloroethylene, and vinyl chloride were found in

concentrations above 250 ppb.

The site is located on the floodplain of the Racoon

River, approximately one mile west of the confluence of the

Raccoon and Des Moines Rivers. The general flow of the

Raccoon River is eastward. However, approximately 1/2 mile

west of the site the river meanders such that the river flow

direction is to the south near the western edge of the land-

filled area. Due to levee construction, the southern and

topographically lower portion of the site is in a 100 year

floodplain, with the area at and north of Tuttle Street in a

100-500 year floodplain1.

The principle mode of transport of potential contami-

nants generated at the Tuttle Street Landfill is by ground-

water. Substantial evidence has been obtained in the FIT

investigation of DICO (TDD No. R-07-8101-7D) that ground-

water flow in this area is northwest towards the north

gallery of the water supply system. The flow is induced by

drawdown, caused by a pumping rate of 7.5 million gallons

per day. It is possible that groundwater underlying the

Tuttle Street landfill is discharging into the Raccoon River

and into the infiltration gallery.

A secondary mode of transport of potential contaminants

is by surface flow into drainage culverts along the levee

and subsequently into the Raccoon River (see Figure 2-1 and

4-4 DB004609

Page 16: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

photographs in the Appendix). These culverts are connected

to a sewer line that drains from the north and by pipe

soutnward to the Raccoon River. Due to the high permeabil-

ity of the rubble fill and due to low relief and slope, sur-

face migration is not the major transport mechanism.

Additionally, well drained to excessively drained soils

of the Colo-Dickinson-Dorchester-Waukegan Series occur in

the vicinity of the site^. Considering the opportunity

for recharge and the proximity to the Raccoon River, the

seasonal high of the groundwater table is within 15 feet of

the surface under the Tuttle Street Landfill area. The net

precipitation of the area is approximately -4 inches3.

Beneath the soil cover approximately 35 feet of

alluvium overlie Pennsylvanian-age (Cherokee Group) shale.

Alluvium is bounded by valley walls of Wisconsin till to the

north and lowan loess overlying Kansan glacial drift to the

south4. Alluvium in the area generally consists of an

upper horizon of silty clay or clayey silt that is underlain

by silty sand, grading into coarse sand and gravel. The

permeability of the alluvium ranges from moderate to very

high while the underlying shale bedrock acts as an aquitard

and thus confines significant groundwater flow.

Despite past and on-going studies at DICO, a source for

certain pollutants has not been identified. These include

the known carcinogen, vinyl chloride, found in both soil and

water samples at DICO, and other volatile organics such as

bromomethane and trans 1,3-dichloropropene detected in past

4-5DB004610

Page 17: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

analyses. Although these constituents may be present as im-

purities in the degreasing sludge once spread at DICO to

control dust or may be degradation byproducts of this

sludge, the possibility still remains for a source outside

of DICO's influence. The Tuttle Street landfill is a

possible source considering the direction of groundwater

flow (predominately northwest) and the apparent laxity of

controls during the filling of this landfill.

4-6DB004611

Page 18: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 5: WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

Volatile organic contaminants have been detected in the

groundwater in: 1) the north gallery, 2) a monitoring well

located between the river and the north gallery, and 3) in

several monitoring wells on the east side of the river

between the levee and SW 16th Street (mainly on DICO

property). Volatile organics were also detected in soil

samples taken from well borings; but to date, only in those

from DICO property. L p,cVS<<J>

Assuming most of the fill at the Tuttle Gfe~ek Landfill

is demolition debris and that the fill resembles that at

DICO, the amount of fill averages 10 feet and consists main-

ly of brick and concrete with possible drums (empty or

otherwise). Some of this debris was moved during con-

struction of railroad tracks along the levee (see photo-

graphs in the Appendix).

At the present level of this investigation, no evidence

has been found either by visual observations or interviews

to indicate that significant quantities of industrial wastes

were disposed of at the Tuttle Street Landfill. However, as

discussed previously, the character of the materials buried

is unknown, as is the groundwater quality.

If related to a common source as the DICO site, the

suspected contaminants at the Tuttle Street Landfill would

5-1DB004612

Page 19: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

be many and varied in characteristics. The volatile organ-

ics discussed in the previous section' (see Tables 4-1 and

4-2) are mostly highly toxic and suspected or known carcino-

gens. These compounds occur as liquids with vapor pressures

varying from low (58 mm) for TCE to very high (2600 mm) for

vinyl chloride^. Some have relatively high densities,

such as TCE (1.46) and bromomethane (1.73)^, and would

tend to settle to the bottom of the aquifer and move along

the alluvial-bedrock interface. Compounds such as bromo-

dichloromethane are highly persistent and not easily bio-

degraded. Most of these compounds are only slightly soluble

(<1%) and not of an ignitable or corrosive danger under

present conditions. Ignitability of these compounds ranges

from low for TCE to high for vinyl chloride.

The concentration of organic contaminants in the

groundwater of the area appears to be decreasing slightly

with time since the ceasation of spreading sludges at DICO

in 1979. However, due to the complexities of groundwater

flow, it is difficult to make a long range prediction that

this trend will continue or accelerate.

5"2 DB004613

Page 20: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 6: WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

The Tuttle Street Landfill was closed and covered in

the mid-late 1960's. The area has since been partitioned so

that there are several owners and businesses (see Table 2-1)

involved with various points of access. As only demolition

debris has been found on the surface, any possible hazardous

wastes would be expected to occur beneath the surface. The

amount of hazardous wastes may be relatively small — the

result of possible midnight or other uncontrolled dumping.

Unless sealed drums are present, the danger of incompatible

wastes is minimal as the mixture will have already reached

an equilibium.

It is not known that any liners or leachate collection

systems were used at this landfill. However, due to the in-

tended use of the landfill, it is considered unlikely that

such preventive measures were used.

6~1 DB004614

Page 21: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 7: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

While the possibility of former disposal of hazardous

wastes at the Tuttle Street Landfill seems remote, mainly

due to lack of records on fill material, this possibility

should not be ignored. Trichloroethylene (TCE) contamina-

tion of the Des Moines public water supply has been docu-

mented over the past several years. At least some of the

TCE contamination can be traced to DICO (located immediately

west of the Tuttle Street landfill area); but for some con-

taminants found in soil and water samples at DICO, no known

source exists. And inasmuch as groundwater at the Tuttle

Street landfill area is located upgradient of both DICO and

the city's north infiltration gallery system, monitoring of

this possible source is warranted. If this area proves to

be devoid of these contaminants, then monitoring data would

serve as background for DICO studies.

The installation of a system of monitoring wells locat-

ed around the periphery of the old landfill area should be

considered. Some wells could be placed to intercept ground-

water flow between the old landfill and the DICO plant.

Other wells could be put toward the south edge of the site

to monitor groundwater flow in that area in the event a

groundwater divide occurs such that flow in this area would

be towards the river. Finally, a background well should be

7-1DB004615

Page 22: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

located to the northeast of the old landfill area. Figure

7-1 shows general locations for these wells. Location and

number of wells are dependent upon access agreements and

locations of sewer and utility lines.

7-2DB004616

Page 23: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

Figure 7-1 Location of proposed and existingmonitoring wells in the Tuttle Streetlandfill and DICO areas, respectively.Base map is from Federal HighwayAdministration-Iowa Dept. of Transporta-tion Environmental Impact Statement 83-01-D.

7-3DB004617

Page 24: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

SECTION 8: REFERENCES

Federal Highway Administration - Iowa Department ofTransportation Environmental Impact Statement 83-01-D.

Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department ofAgriculture, 1960, Soil Survey — Polk County, Iowa,Series 1953, no. 9, 96 p.

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1979, Climatic Atlas of theUnited States, National Climatic Center, Ashville,North Carolina.

Bain, H.F., 1896, Geology of Polk County, IowaGeological Survey Annual Report 7, p. 263-412.

Sax, N.I., 1979, Dangerous Properties of IndustrialMaterials, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company: New York,N.Y., 1118 p.

8-1

DB004618

Page 25: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

£\ f_^r}/\ • i i . T I A L HA7 AKDOUS * A S T E SITEV./'l—I *~\ JDEKl l i lC; . - ^ AH? PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT I• ——~-————————————————————————•——————•————•——" ————— —~- ———•—————————-——•————•—- • •• ——-- •-———————————-————— ——.——— _——————————, - _______ __._.______ ___ __ 1

NOTE: THit Conn It comj.ltlrd (CM r « c >. [ u ! r r . t > « l htnrdout «.»tle »ite lor. dp »rt priori..e* lor i Ite Iniprrtion. T>ir Inlor-r . l:.r. I• uV-rcltled on this form It b»rd on oallablr rorotdt end nay bt updited on tubtrqucnt form* *i t retull ol •ddillontl Inpuirln• od ob-«lle Ln »t>TC UOD».

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Complete Eecboni 1 »nd HI O>ruuer> X •• completely •• poitlblr before Section II (PielimlntryA»*t**tn»nt). Flte Ihli (om In the Regional H»l«rdou» »tltt Lot File knd tubmil • copy to: U.S. Environment*) ProterliooAgrocy; Sit* Trackinf Ejtlem; H»»»r<Joo» l»»le Enforcement T»tk Force (£/V->J3>. 40) U St.. SW. Wohinflon, DC 20460.

1. SITE IDENTIFICATIONA. SITE. NAME

Tuttle Street Landfill (Central Des Moinesc. c,jfUui>lr1d1 Park)

Des Moines

B. S T R E E T (» *(r>»r H»ntlllft)In oroximity of Tuttle St. & SW 14th Street

D.STATE

IowaE. ZIP CODE

50309F. COUNTY N A M E

Polk___C. OwNER/OPt RATOR (II

various - see attached list and Table 2-1I i. Tri_c^Mom

M. TYPE OF OwNtRSMIP

1 )t. r EDEKAL. CD2' *T*TE CZ11- COUNTY CD* MUNICIPAL P3 & PRIVATE [ ]t. UNKNOWN

t. »ITf DEiCRIPTIOH

old landfill -- closed and coveredJ. HO» IDENTIFIED (I.*.. ell/«»"'« ee»»>l»in»«. OSHX cll'flon*. *leO

During DICO Investigations - identified by Harold Carville (DICO)

K. DATE IDENTIFIED(••o., d*r. 4 r*~)

1980L. PRINCIPAL S T A T E CONTACT

Mr. George Welch, Iowa Dept. of Water, Air and Waste Management 515/281-890011- P R E L I M I N A R Y A S S E S S M E N T fcocy»lgla thlt •ecb'on

A. «>P> ARrWi'sf RToUTsiii OF PROBLEM

\—[<. HIGH (??32- MEDIUM 1 \*. LO* [~~]« NONE [~~]s UNKNOWN

S. RECOMMENDATION

[ ] |. NO A C T I O N N E E D E D fr*o >>•

INiPECTIpN»C HI OUL ED POM

WILL •! PI«FO"l«JtO

Installation of monitoring wells

1 ] 1 I M M E D I A T E SITE INSPECTION NEEDED«. T E N T A T I V E L Y 1 C M C D U I . C D f O«

b WILL »E PCHPOKI - ICD BY:

[ ]4. SITE INSPECTION NEEDED f/e- Pr/o,i

C. PREPARER I N F O R M A T I O N

Sharon P. Martin, Ecology & Environment, Inc.I 2. TELEPHONE MUU

913/371-3213i. D A T E (no.. *«r. 4 r>-;

11/3/83111. SITE INFORMATION

A. SITE STATUS[ ] 1. ACTIVE (T7>o.. I. INACTIVE H>. OTHER (•p.cllr)'_____

«•• •!!•• thar Includ* *urhdl»po»m1

IS GENERATOR ON SITE*

rxi«. *o | ^ 2. vei (•/••«"> «•»••'•••»•• lo-M sic c»d

C. AREA Of SITE fl» »C»»»J

approx. 85 acres

D. IF APPARENT SERIOUSNESS OF SITE IS HIGH. SPECIFY COORDINATESI LATITUDE (**!•—•"'"•—***') I 1. LOMCITUOE (4*t-—•><«.— ••cj

41° 34' 38.7" N 93° 37' 49.8" WE. ARE THERE •UILDIMGS OM THE SITEI

•Q«.no CQi- YTsoF.c.rw Paxton Lvnber, Rounds and Porter, Inc., & Merchants Warehouse

TJ070-JConfinwc On

A-1 DB004619

Page 26: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

I V . C H A K A C 1 1 N 01 S l t F A C T I V I T Y

!o_>c « .» I •'

. T W A W S P O K T I R

>. »MIP

• > «nd fr\*'.\t >r!»l lr. f Ic f »rh • c t l v l t y I j tr;«rllr.( 'X' In t>.» «[>proprl«l» boi»i.

X. S T O K E R C . 1 H I A T t

I . r IL T n A TION

1. IN C l*> I M A T ION

X 'D. DiiPOJCR

I . L ANDr ILL

I- L AN D r A MM

I. • A R CC i. VOLLIMC MIDUCTION . OPf N DU-"

«. T M U C H CHOUMO . INC/K I C O V t R T IWIPOUNDM(N1

I. PIP CLIMC t. T A N K . B C L O M CHOUMD t . CHIM. /PMVB. . MIDNIOMT OU"'

i. OTHCK X «. «. B I O L O G I C A L (. IN C IN I It AT rON

Lumber YardMerchants WarehouseConstruction Co.

T. W A I T t OIL NC^MOCIXINC . UMDCMCMOUMD INJtCTION

n i c o v c n v

C. SPECIFY DETAILS OF SITE ACTIV IT IES AS NEEDED

Former landfill -- various light industries on site now.

V. WASTE RELATED INFORMATIONA. W A S T E TYPE

[~~)|. UNKNOWN LIQUID ». SOLID SLUDGE t~l»- GAS

B. W A S T E C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S /

[— ),. UNKNOWN O»- CORROSIVE QV. ICNITABLK O«- RADIOACTIVE

[J]*. TOXIC Q'- REACTIVE [~Y» INERT (~~1»- FLAMMABLE

MICMLV VOLATILE

OTHER f.p.cifr; _Susjiectej wastes - TCE and other volatile organicsC A T E G O R I E S

rord* of »«H.. Sp .c l f j

None known to exist2. EmUn>«t» tb« «inount(fpocttf unit of me»*ure)of wnlr by c«trgory; m«rk 'Z' to Lpdlc«l« -whJch w«il«t mre pr«trnt.

.. SLUDGEAMOUNT

JIT 0V M C A t U K C

b. OIL

UNIT CXT'VIC A

e . S O L V E N T S

Unknown_____MIT Or UCAtJMt

d. C H E M I C A L SAMOUNT

UNIT Of MC A §U« t

«. SOLIDSA MC-' IN T

UNIT Or MCAIUME

I. OTHER

UNIT or uc A tune

I I) PA INT .PICMCNT*

111 UCT AL«

Ml OILY«A1TC*

111 POT*

IIIM•OLVCNT1

III NON-H A L O C N T O•OLVCN1I

111 O T H C Plf

•LUDCC

Ml A CIO>

111 P I C K L I N GLIQUOnl

111 C AU1TIC*

141 P 11TIC IOCS

III DT I i/IN Kl

III C V ANIDI

111 rLVAlH

(II A I B C I T O I

III MILL INC/MINE TAILING!

FCMROU1' IULTC. KAITC1

NON-r CMHOU*1 M L T C . W A I T C I

. L A B O H A T O H Y' P H A M M A C IUT.

Ill HOlPIT AL

III H A D I O A C T I V K

ITI PMtNOLB

ill MALOCCMI

III PC*

IMC T AL*

1 I I O TM C * (fff

DB004620

Page 27: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

i> i"».-ii.TT A N C I I or. I T I *. r L A T f P l K F C K f c » M I O M (tonttnutd)• .«i c >- WAY PL OK TH{ V i l t ( r ' * < * ' " * * * c * r ^ '

Trichloroethylene (TCE) \Other volatile organics, in minor amounts:

vinyl chloride;bromome thane; trans 1 ,3-dichloropropene

4. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR N A R R A T I V E DESCRIPTION OF S I T U A T I O N K N O W N Oft R E P O R T E D TO E X I S T AT THE SITE.

No records or communications verifying hazardous waste disposal at site. However,site is located close to several past generators of such waste. Additionally public -watPr SUDDlv i* contaminated with ICE. ——————————————————————— _ ———————————————————

———— — VI. H A Z A R D D E S C R I P T I O N

A- TYPE OF KAIARD

1. NO MAX AMD

1. MUfAM HCAUTM

NON-*>OHKCR*• INJURT/CX^O»t»««

«. W O M K C M IMJOBV

C O H T A M I M & T I O N•• Of W A T C * lU^Pl-Y

C O M T A k 4 I M A f l O N•• or rooo CHAIN

C OM T »»JIN » T ION* • or C»»OIJWD W A T I *

C O W T A " I M » T ' O N* • O F » U « ' » C l W A T C "

O*"* C C TO*• r L ow A/r AUNA

1C. FI»M KILL

C O M T AI^IW A TIO»i* * • OF AIR

11. M O T I C « A » » _ l OOOWt

,, CONTAMINATION Or »OIL

14. * R O * I R T T OAUACE

________ ——————— ——————— —————————— - ——————

I. PIMK OR K»FL01IOM ,

• IH.m/1-I AKIN6 CONYAINl«»/'•• VuNOrr/iTANDlNC LIQUID*

. ——— —— - ——— ——————S C O C M . «TOR««

1T- DRAIN rnO«LI»0

It. «RO«ION rnO«LK-»

. ——— ————— — • —————,«. INADCOUATC »«CU«ITY

. —————————————— ————————— ————————————

,». »NCO«»ATI«Lt «A»Ttl

___ ————————————— - ———————————————

11. MIONI«MT OU««^«"«

XX. 01»«l«f«*»«'W

».POTEN-

T I A LH A 7 X R D

f^.iH -X')

X

X

X

X

X

X

C.A L L E G E DINCIDENT(•»..<» 'JC'J

"•~^-.-, '

D. D A T E OFINCIDENT

f»io..rf»7.r».J

-TS' -"• - ' : •*< ~

*

1

C. R E M A R K S

V_^-vV.:iV*-:v>-K---v--V^>'-/,,^ir.,O^'a-.»^.-C;--.i

TCE - carcinogen

TCE present in drinking water

Site is possible source for knowncontamination.

Site is possible source for knowncontamination.

-

PACE > or 4

A-3DB004621

Page 28: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

A. INCH All *l t A f F - , . H . » r i * l ''I MILD »T l* t

t — ] i. H»-DI v PIHUI

Q3 4. AIK P E R M I T *

| —— 1 7.

[^] x ir-cc PL [^) »

O I. LOCAL PIKUIT [ ) I

[ ] ». KCHA

pr »MIT ( • / • • ( ir

T K * * i^O K T t *

10. (ftttr) Unknown, probably none neededIN COMPLIANCE'

«• 1. NO ( 1 >. UNKNOWN

4. WITH KCS>ECT TO fl/*>l rwjwUffM •***.• 4

VIH. PAST REGULATORY ACTIONSA. WONC f*t«x«»*rf»* b«fow)

IX. INSPECTION ACTIV ITY (P**t or

| 1 A. NONE [X] •. YES fco-^J.r. 1,. . J.J.j. A t

A C T I V I T Ya D A T C OP

P A S T AC TION . DOCMIPTION

Site Visit 6/14/83 FITSite inspection, information retrieval byJohn Caoile and James Jackson.

X. R E M E D I A L A C T I V I T Y (p*»f or on Jofnfl)

A. NONE [ j B. V ES .»,• 1.3.3. A 4

I . T Y P I O f A C T I V I T Ya. D A T E or

P A S T A C TION(B.O.. «»«r. 4 T'*)

«. OC1CMIPTION

NOTE' Based on the information in Sections DI thrr-jgh X, Gil out the Prel iminary Assessment (Section II)information on the first page of this form. ________________________________

~- TJ070-J (>0-7») FACE 4 OF 4

A-4 DB004622

Page 29: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

Attachment to Form-; 2070-2

Land Ownership in Central Des Moines Industrial Park(Tuttle Street Landfill Area)

Iowa Power & Light823 Walnut StreetDes Moines, IA 50319(515) 281-2222

Frank Paxton Lumber Co.205 SW llth StreetDes Moines, IA 50309(515) 283-2131

Joseph N. Chamberlain1727 Grand AvenueDes Moines, IA 50309(515) 288-0500

Rounds & Porter Lumber Co.315 SW 14th StreetDes Moines, IA 50309(515) 243-0538

Des Moines Union Railway Co,902 Walnut StreetDes Moines, IA 50319(515) 288-6549

Peter F. Acri3226 Wakonda CourtDes Moines, IA 50321(515) 285-2656)

Frank A. Acri (Trust)3508 SE 18 CourtDes Moines, IA 50320(515) 244-1796

Joseph D. Acri(Estate or Trust)Address Unknown

F. M. Hubbell & Son Co.(Hubbell Realty Co.)Address Unknown

Merchants Transfer & Storage(Merchants White LineWarehouse, Inc.)1350 Market StreetDes Moines, IA 50309(515) 244-2123

A-5

DB004623

Page 30: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

VTING FORM FOR WASTE 1

NAMEOfsrrc Tuttle Street Landfill t

LOCATION Des Moines, Iowa

DISPO .L SITES

ICTTVt^JNACTTvfr INACTIVE AND ABANDONED (CIRCLE ONE)

OWNER/OPERATOR various businesses now located there

t^^Lrrc. The landfill was closed and covered in mid-late 1960 's .

PREPARED BY: Sharon P. Martin, Ecology & Environment, Inc. ON Nov. 3, ,„ 83

RATINGFACTOR

SOURCE AND BASISOF INFORMATION

SITE RATINGICIRCU ONE)

MULTI-PLIER

SITESCORE

MAXIMUMPOSSIBLE

SCORERECEPTORS

POPOLATKJN WTTMIN 1.000 FTFT

DISTANCE TO NEAREST DRINKING-WATER WELL

DISTANCE TO NEAREST OFF STOBUILDING

LAND USE ATONING

CRmCAL ENVIRONMENTS

ADDITIONAL POINTS FOR OTHERRECEPTORS

no residences

gallery system

ad.iacentindustrial

none

e0

0

0

<D

1

1

1

1

1

2

©

2

<s>2

S

3

Qa

3

12

8

8

6

6

work force

MiiMnnt nr MISSINC, AND ASSUMED VALUES . 0 our of

PERCENTAGE OF MISSING AND ASS LJMED VALUES . 0 *.

SUBTOTALS

SUBSCORE(SITE SCORE CMAXIMUM SC

0 .

16

2412

0

10

62

MV1DED BYORE AND MULT)

36

24

24

18

'18

60

17036.5 .

PLJED BY 100 i

PATHWAYS

EVIDENCE Of CONTAMINATION

LEVEL Of CONTAMINATION

TYPE OF CONTAMINATION

DISTANCE TO NEARESTSURFACE WATtR

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATtR

NET PRECIPfTATON

SOIL PERMEABILITY

BEDROCK PERMEABILITY

DEJTM TO BEDROCK

ADDITIONAL POINTSFOR OTHER PATHWAYS

NUMBER OF M7SSJNG AND ASSUMED

PERCENTAGE Of MASSING AMD ASSU

located upgraaieni OTpublic water supplyunknown - low levels

public water supply

adjacent to river

less than 15 feet

-4.2 inches

alluvium (hiqh)shale

40-45 feet

0

0

0

«

0

e

&•

oo

1

1

1

o1

1

£VAl If* . 0 OUT Of B.

"rp«»^*f _ 0 »

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

&&6

a

(5is

2

7

5

8

7

6

6

4

4

DB004624HJB TOTALS

KUISIMA

BSCOREIT SCORf DTJUMUM SCO

2

- • " 7

15

24

21

6

1R

0

4

0

97

tflDFD BY

6

21

15

24

21

16

12

12

25

172

56.4«E AND MULTIPLIED BY UX»

recycled papier and rminmmrnt. inr.

A-6

Page 31: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

. o, Tuttle Str£ Landfill

WASTE CHARACTERISTICS

TOXJOTY

RADIOACTIVITY

PERSISTENCE

•GNrTABIUTY

REACTIVITY

CORROSIVENESS

SOLUBILITY

VOLATILITY

rHYSICAL STATE

ADDITIONAL POINTS FOR OTHERWASTE CHARACTERISTICS

Possible TCE*

Background levelsPossible TCE*

Possible TCE*

Possible TCE*

pH 6-9

Possible TCE*

Possible TCE*

Liquid

0

&e

(!)

©

(i>0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

©1

1

(l)3

6)2

t

2

a

®<D

a

s

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

7

7

B

3

3

3

4

4

4

Carcinogen

*NUMBER OF MISSING AND ASSUMED VALUES - 6 OUT Of B

PERCENTAGE OF MISSING ANDTkS!>UMED VALUES » 66 . 7 %

SUBTOTALS

SUBSCOREJSITE SCORE DMAXIMUM SCC

14

0

10

0

0

04

8

8

751

VIDEO BY)RE AND MULTIPI

21

21

15

9

9

9

12

12

12

20

140

36.4

JED BY 100.1

WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

SJTE SECURITY

HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY

TOTAL WASTE OUANTTTY

WASTE INCOMPATIBILITY

USE Of UNEKS

USE OF LEACKATECOLLECDON SYSTEMS

USE OF GASCOLLECTION SYSTEMS

USE AND CONDITIONOF CONTAINERS

ADDITIONAL POINTS FOR OTHERWASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

* NUMBER Of MISSING AND ASSUM1

PERCENTAGE OF M1SSJNG AMD AS!

No barriers

0-250 tons0-10 acres

none expected

nonenone

none

possible drums*

0

&&&

e

e

e

e

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

o

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

a

0y

3

j

&&Q

3

7

7

6

5

3

3

2

2

T> VALUFS . 1 OUT Of ft.

ojMm VAtun -11.1 %.

SUBTOTALS

SUBisrrtMAX

NUMBER OF MISSING AMD ASSUMED TOTAL SITE SCOREVA1U«. 7 OUT Of H

PERCENTAGE Of UtSSJNG AMD*51HJ"TP vAiurs . 22.6 .»

TOTALMAXJ

OVERALL SOfTOTAL SCO*AND MULTIP-

SCORESCORE DfVIMUM SCO

21

0

0

0

99

6

2

o47

21

21

15

15

9

9

6

6

30

126

37.3HDED BY 1 ——————————RE AND MULTIPLIED BY 100)

257

MUM POSSIBLE SITE S(

DUE

-f«r fiflR

42.3

«E CXV1DEO BY MAXIMUM SCOREUED BY 100)

A-7DB004625

Page 32: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

TUTTLE STREET

AE:SOLUTE LEVEL OF HAZARD

10 20

Overall Score!

30 ^0 50 60 70 80 90 100

VERY LOW

TLOW - MED - HIGH • VERY HIGH •

Overal1f> c or e t

1 00-

90-

30-

70-

60-

50-

30-

20-

10-

0-

Gerieralized Level of Hazard;

AF-PROF-RIATE LEVEL OF RESF'ONSE

Level ofResponse t

IMMINENT

HIGH

es

-100

-90

-00

-70

-60M

-50

LOW

-30

-20

-10

-0

Source! "Methodology for Rating the Hazard Potential ofWaste Disposal Sites" by JRE; Associates, 1980.

A-8 DB004626

Page 33: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

P h o t o g r a p h e r

John Caoile

Wi tness :

J1m Jackson

Date : 6-14-83

T ime: 1300 hours

Di rec t ion :

N o . Subjec t : East ponded ditch on south end of site.

Faci 1 Ity: Tuttle Street Landfill - Des Moines. la.

Pho tog raphe r

John Caoile

Wi tness :

Jim Jackson

Date : 6-14-83

Time: 1315 hours

Di rect ion South

No. 2 Subject : Pond overflow channel at discharge pipeundpr PR trarlrc and IPUPP tn Parrnnn P1i/ar ————————————————

Faci l i ty : StrPPt lanHfiH - He* Mninps. la.A-9

DB004627

Page 34: TASK REPORT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ...

No 3 S u b j e c t : _ View from southwest corner of site,,exposed rubble fill on left side of photograph.______

Tac i l i t y : Tuttle Street Landfill - Des Moines. la.

P h o t o g r a p h e r

John Caoile

Wi tness :

Jim Jackson

Date : 6-14-83

Time: 1330 hours

D i rec t ion : Northeast

Pho tog raphe r

John Caoile

Wi tness :

Jim Jackson

Date : 6-14-83

Time : ^45 hours

Di rect ion East

No. 4 Subject: Southwest area of site, view of rubblefill eXCavatpfj for* plyrymant qf frarlrc ————————————————————

Fac i l i t y : Tuttle Street Landfill - Des Hoines. la.A-10

DB004628


Recommended