Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | chetana-didugu |
View: | 233 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
1/37
A linear Programming Model for
Distribution of Electrical Energy in aSteel Plant
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
2/37
Guiding Principle
The guiding principle of this model is
that in the case of power shortage,
power is allocated to those non-essential loads which have a higher
contribution per unit.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
3/37
Introduction Optimal allocation of electrical energy is a very
important decision with the management of asteel plant.
This case study deals with the development andimplementation of a mathematical model for
optimal allocation energy in a steel plant.
Unlike in other studies, in this case study thesteel plant ha been modeled with a profit
maximization objective and energy as a limiting
constraint.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
4/37
Historical Development of the
Company
The steel company where the modelwas developed was the largest private
company in India. Started in 1907 in the
eastern part of India, it had grown over
the years and is now the second largest
steel company in India with a sales
revenue of approximately 1.05 billion
dollars. (1992)
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
5/37
Goutam Dutta 5
Basic Flow Sheet in an Integrated
Steel Plant
Iron
Making
Steel
makingCasting
Rolling
Finish
Rolling
RM
Processing
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
6/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
7/37
The model is now extensively used for the following:
1.Optimal allocation of the plant capacities to the various
markets.
2.To indicate the economics of individual products on an
overall basis.
3.The potential benefit of capacity expansion proposals.4.Optimal route of a product.
5.Best use of limiting processes like a bogie bottom
pouring, normalizing and cold drawing.
6.Break-even price of critical products like scrap, coal
and coke.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
8/37
102
97
92
87
82
77
72
AVERAGEP
OWER(MEGAW
ATT)
APR 86 JAN 87 JAN 88 JAN 89 JAN 90
WITH MODERNISATION, TATA STEELS DEMAND FOR POWER
CONTINUALLY EXCEEDS THE AVAILABILITY OF POWER.
POWER DEFICIT
POWER REQUIRED BY WORKS
POWER AVAILABLE TO WORKS
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
9/37
Definitions, Assumptions and
constraints (contd..)
Power balance:
The four major components in the
power balance:
1. Power generation processors.
2. Power consuming processors.
3. External power purchased.4. Fixed power requirement.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
10/37
Power Flow in the Steel Plant :
POWER HOUSE NO 2
POWER HOUSE NO 3
POWER HOUSE NO 4
POWER HOUSE NO 5
D G SETS
EXTERNAL SUPPLY
POWER
SYSTEM
CONTROL
BY
CENTRAL
CONTROL
ROOM
ESSENTIAL LOADS
NON ESSENTIAL
LOADS
ASSOCIATED
COMPANIES
CITY POWER
Power Distribution Diagram
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
11/37
Problem of Power Allocation in
our Steel Plant
Supply fluctuation
Demand fluctuation
Essential loads Domestic load or city power
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
12/37
Definitions, Assumptions and
constraints
Processor: A processor is a unit which producessteel, hot metal or provides service to the steel plant.
Net Realization: The net realization of he product isthe difference between the price and the totaldeduction in the form of taxes, excise duties and
other dues in the government.
Variable Cost: This is the sum of all the materialcosts and the variable portion of the conversioncost.
Contribution: The difference between the netrealization and the variable cost of the product.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
13/37
Model Formulation
The model is based on linear
programming and hierarchical
optimization
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
14/37
Processor
Very similar to a facility
It converts input/inputs (raw materials) to
outputs
It will consume electricity by knowing itsgiven by parameter (KWH/ton)
It may consume oxygen (NM3/ton)
It may consume fuel (Kcal/ton)
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
15/37
Materials
It may be input/ WIP/output
A processor convert one material to
another material
Every materials have net realization,
variable cost.
When a material is processed in a facility,it has yield and OHPT or TPOH that is
required in LP formulation
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
16/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
17/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
18/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
19/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
20/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
21/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
22/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
23/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
24/37
Model Formulation
The model is based on linear
programming and hierarchical
optimization
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
25/37
Model Formulation
Objective : Maximize the Contribution to
Profit
Contribution = Net Realization-Variable
Cost
Constraints
Material Balance
Energy Balance
Oxygen Balance
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
26/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
27/37
Model
400 equations
750 variables
200 marketing bounds
MPS-TEMPO (Burroughs 6800)
VAX VMS 2-3 min
Scatter diagram showing the line of best
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
28/37
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
X-Axis: PRODUCTION (THOUSAND TONNES)
Y-Axis: POWER CONSUMPTION (MILLION KWH)
Y-INTECEPT = FIXED POWER (KWH/TONNE)
SLOPE = VARIABLE POWER
CONSUMPTION (KWH/TONNE)
Scatter diagram showing the line of best
fit of the total electrical energy consumed
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
29/37
Model Implementation
Marginal contribution of power
Financial benefit after 1986-87
Financial benefit per unit after 1986-87Following are the graphs representing the
above three issues.
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
30/37
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
X-axis :External MW
Y-axis :Rs.10000/MW
Marginal contribution of Power
70 At low levels of availability, the marginal contribution of power is very high;
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
31/37
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
035 40 45 50 55 60 65
VARIABLE POWER (MEGAWATT)
MONEYUNIT
PERMONTH
At low levels of availability, the marginal contribution of power is very high;
as power becomes abundant, its incremental contribution drops sharply
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
32/37
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1991/92
1.06
Prodn.
Expend.1.869
Gr. Rev. 2.04
Profit 2.79
Financial benefit after 1986-87
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
33/37
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
1986/87 1987/88 1988/89 1989/90 1990/91 1991/92
Profit/ton2.62
Gr.Rev./ton
1.92
Expend./ton
1.75
Financial benefit per unit after 1986-87
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
34/37
Before Implementation After Implementation
MEGAWATT PRODUCTON CONTRIBUTION
AN EMPHASIS SHIFT FROM TONNES/KWH TO CONTRIBUTION/VARIABLE KWH
LED TO OPTIMAL USE OF AVAILABLE POWER
Aug 86 Sep Oct Nov Dec 86
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
35/37
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
36/37
Implementation problems in a
developing country
Social responsibility of the company
Data consistency
Linearity of some mills Software availability
C l i
8/11/2019 Tata Steel Power
37/37
Conclusion In addition to deciding the priority in the case of power
crisis, planning the production target marketing
strategy, the model is being used in critical situations.The implementation of the model has not only had asignificant impact on the performance of theorganization, but has also enhanced the confidence ofthe top management in using Operations Research and
Management Science Techniques for making short- andlong-term business decisions. The model has beensuccessfully tested on a steel plant as well as on a tubemanufacturing plant. Since the power shortage situationis expected to continue for at least a decade in adeveloping country like India, these types of modelscan be utilized in other steel industries and other similarindustries to improve the industrial productivity andprofitability in a constrained situation.