+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

Date post: 04-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: darrylcroft
View: 223 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    1/18

    Taxing carrots and sticks:

    Incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    Darryl CroftDirector

    World Sustainable Energy Days 2013Wels, Austria

    27 February 2013

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    2/18

    Outline

    Key barriers to uptake of energy efficiency

    Use of Energy Efficient Stamp Duty (EESD)

    Integration with financing approaches

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    3/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    4/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

    Energy

    efficiency

    measures must

    pay back

    through fuel billsavings

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    5/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

    Key Barrier 2

    Period of occupancytypically shorter

    than lifetime of

    measures

    Energy

    efficiency

    measures must

    pay back

    through fuel billsavings

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    6/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

    Key Barrier 2

    Period of occupancytypically shorter

    than lifetime of

    measures

    Energy

    efficiency

    measures must

    pay back

    through fuel bill

    savings

    Risk over pay-

    back: Expensive

    measures

    excluded, risk

    over cheaper

    measures

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    7/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

    Key Barrier 2

    Period of occupancytypically shorter

    than lifetime of

    measures

    Energy

    efficiency

    measures must

    pay back

    through fuel bill

    savings

    Risk over pay-

    back: Expensive

    measures

    excluded, risk

    over cheaper

    measures

    Finance

    mechanisms

    (eg. UK Green

    Deal)

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    8/18

    Why lack of motivation for EE?

    Key Barrier 1

    Energy efficiency

    doesnt add value to

    property

    Key Barrier 2

    Period of occupancytypically shorter

    than lifetime of

    measures

    Energy

    efficiency

    measures must

    pay back

    through fuel bill

    savings

    Risk over pay-

    back: Expensive

    measures

    excluded, risk

    over cheaper

    measures

    Property taxes

    (e.g. Purchase,

    Municipal)

    Finance

    mechanisms

    (eg. UK Green

    Deal)

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    9/18

    Stamp Duty Land Tax

    Charged as a percentage of the value of property purchased

    Up to 125,000 Zero125,001 - 250,000 1%250,001 - 500,000 3%500,001 to 1 million 4%

    Over 1 million 5%

    Precedent for using SDLT to deliver additional objectives:

    From 2010, 0% rate extended to properties worth up to 250,000 for firsttime buyers

    Since 2007 all new Zero Carbon homes are fully exempt from SDLT

    Proposal: Use SDLT to address first barrier:

    Adjust rate of SDLT paid by the purchaser based upon the energy efficiency ofproperty being bought = Energy Efficient Stamp Duty (EESD)

    www.ukace.org

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    10/18

    An Illustration

    300,000

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    11/18

    -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0 +0.5 +1.0 +1.5300,000300,000

    An Illustration

    EPC Band B EPC Band E

    Standard SDLT: 3% 3%

    EE adjustment: -1% +0.5%

    Final rate: 2% 3.5%

    Cost: 6,000 10,500

    Stamp Duty Land Tax adjusted based on EPC rating

    A B C D E F G

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    12/18

    Theoretical Impact

    EE property requires 4,500 lower tax payment

    EE property more attractive to purchaser since invokes a lower tax

    payment

    EE property has increased value as a result

    Incumbent household has confidence that improving efficiency will

    increase value

    Household chooses to invest in energy efficiency immediately: inaddition, they benefit from lower fuel bills until point of sale

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    13/18

    Installation costs vs tax reduction

    For 44% of households SDLT reduction would exceed the installation cost

    required to move up one EPC band

    80% when including 5 years of fuel bill savings

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    14/18

    Financing with Energy Efficient tax

    Case becomes compelling when twinned with financing

    mechanism:

    removes upfront capital requirement

    Energy Efficiency Stamp Duty is a motivation, encouraging energyefficiency take-up via Green Deal

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    15/18

    Financeable improvements

    EPC ratings of English homes under financing scenarios:

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    16/18

    Relevance for financing

    Concern is that a finance charge will be viewed negatively by

    purchasers i.e. depress house price.

    Energy Efficient tax is designed to increase value of efficient

    properties: may have a finance charge attached but willinvoke a lower tax payment

    => Efficient properties with finance are more attractive

    improving efficiency through the Green Deal seen as adding

    value.

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    17/18

    Conclusions

    Reflecting energy efficiency in value of property is desirable

    merely reflects running costs

    EE property taxes are a mechanism that could help deliver this

    Could drive uptake of finance mechanisms

    Would address the perceived concern that a property with

    finance is unattractive due to repayment charge

  • 7/29/2019 Taxing Carrots and Sticks: incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    18/18

    - For further details see:- Croft and Sunderland (2011)

    Addressing Key Barriers in the Delivery of Domestic Energy Efficiency

    Improvements - The Case for Energy Efficiency Property Purchase Taxeshttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdf

    - Croft and Preston (2013)

    Taxing carrots and sticks: Incentivising efficiency through property taxes

    Thank You

    Darryl Croft

    Director, Abelscroft EI

    [email protected]

    http://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdfhttp://www.ukace.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/ACE-Research-2011-06-5-214-Croft.pdf

Recommended