+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Taylor Monomials - in Time Scales - Kansas State University · Taylor Monomials in Time Scales...

Taylor Monomials - in Time Scales - Kansas State University · Taylor Monomials in Time Scales...

Date post: 10-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
62
Taylor Monomials in Time Scales Pauline Ballesteros, Juan Batista, Samantha Bell Department of Mathematics Kansas State University Manhattan, KS 66506 Mathematics REU July 24, 2012 P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials
Transcript

Taylor Monomialsin Time Scales

Pauline Ballesteros, Juan Batista, Samantha Bell

Department of MathematicsKansas State UniversityManhattan, KS 66506

Mathematics REUJuly 24, 2012

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Time Scales

Definition

A Time Scale T is an arbitrary, non-empty closed subset of R.

Examples: R, N, [0, 1], and [−5, 0] ∪ [3, 4] ∪ [8]

Q, (0, 1), and (3, 8] are not time scales.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Time Scales

Definition

A Time Scale T is an arbitrary, non-empty closed subset of R.

Examples: R, N, [0, 1], and [−5, 0] ∪ [3, 4] ∪ [8]

Q, (0, 1), and (3, 8] are not time scales.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Time Scales

Definition

A Time Scale T is an arbitrary, non-empty closed subset of R.

Examples: R, N, [0, 1], and [−5, 0] ∪ [3, 4] ∪ [8]

Q, (0, 1), and (3, 8] are not time scales.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Operators

Definition

The forward jump operatorσ : T→ T is defined by

σ(t) := inf {s ∈ T : s > t}.

Definition

The backward jump operatorρ : T→ T is defined by

ρ(t) := sup{s ∈ T : s < t}.

left scattered ρ(t) < t

right scattered σ(t) > t

left dense ρ(t) = t

right dense σ(t) = t

isolated ρ(t) < t < σ(t)

ρ2(t) ρ(t) t σ(t) σ2(t)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Operators

Definition

The forward jump operatorσ : T→ T is defined by

σ(t) := inf {s ∈ T : s > t}.

Definition

The backward jump operatorρ : T→ T is defined by

ρ(t) := sup{s ∈ T : s < t}.

left scattered ρ(t) < t

right scattered σ(t) > t

left dense ρ(t) = t

right dense σ(t) = t

isolated ρ(t) < t < σ(t)

ρ2(t) ρ(t) t σ(t) σ2(t)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Operators

Definition

The forward jump operatorσ : T→ T is defined by

σ(t) := inf {s ∈ T : s > t}.

Definition

The backward jump operatorρ : T→ T is defined by

ρ(t) := sup{s ∈ T : s < t}.

left scattered ρ(t) < t

right scattered σ(t) > t

left dense ρ(t) = t

right dense σ(t) = t

isolated ρ(t) < t < σ(t)

ρ2(t) ρ(t) t σ(t) σ2(t)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Delta Derivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R and t ∈ T. Then f ∆(t) the real number, if it exists,such that the following holds: ∀ε > 0 ∃δε > 0 such that if|s − t| < δε and s ∈ T then

|f (σ(t))− f (s)− f ∆(t)(σ(t)− s)| ≤ ε|σ(t)− s|.

Theorem

Assume f : T→ R is a continuous function and fix t ∈ Tκ.If t is right dense, then

f ∆(t) = lims→t

f (t)− f (s)

t − s= f ′(t).

If t is right scattered, then

f ∆(t) =f (σ(t))− f (t)

µ(t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Delta Derivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R and t ∈ T. Then f ∆(t) the real number, if it exists,such that the following holds: ∀ε > 0 ∃δε > 0 such that if|s − t| < δε and s ∈ T then

|f (σ(t))− f (s)− f ∆(t)(σ(t)− s)| ≤ ε|σ(t)− s|.

Theorem

Assume f : T→ R is a continuous function and fix t ∈ Tκ.If t is right dense, then

f ∆(t) = lims→t

f (t)− f (s)

t − s= f ′(t).

If t is right scattered, then

f ∆(t) =f (σ(t))− f (t)

µ(t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Nabla Derivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R and t ∈ T. Then f ∇(t) is the real number, if itexists, such that the following holds:∀ε > 0 ∃δε > 0 such that if|s − t| < δε and s ∈ T then

|f (ρ(t))− f (s)− f ∇(t)(ρ(t)− s)| ≤ ε|ρ(t)− s|.

Theorem

Assume f : T→ R is a continuous function and fix t ∈ Tκ.If t is left dense, then

f ∇(t) = lims→t

f (t)− f (s)

t − s= f ′(t).

If t is left scattered, then

f ∇(t) =f (t)− f (ρ(t))

ν(t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Nabla Derivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R and t ∈ T. Then f ∇(t) is the real number, if itexists, such that the following holds:∀ε > 0 ∃δε > 0 such that if|s − t| < δε and s ∈ T then

|f (ρ(t))− f (s)− f ∇(t)(ρ(t)− s)| ≤ ε|ρ(t)− s|.

Theorem

Assume f : T→ R is a continuous function and fix t ∈ Tκ.If t is left dense, then

f ∇(t) = lims→t

f (t)− f (s)

t − s= f ′(t).

If t is left scattered, then

f ∇(t) =f (t)− f (ρ(t))

ν(t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Pre-Antiderivatives

A function f : T→ R is:

regulated if right hand limits are finite at right dense pointsand left hand limits are finite at left dense points.

right dense continuous if it is regulated and continuous atright dense points (denoted as Crd(T)).

pre-differentiable on the region D if Tκ\D is countable and Dcontains no right scattered elements.

Theorem

Let f be regulated. Then there exists a pre-differentiable F withregion of differentiation D such that

F∆(t) = f (t) ∀t ∈ D.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Pre-Antiderivatives

A function f : T→ R is:

regulated if right hand limits are finite at right dense pointsand left hand limits are finite at left dense points.

right dense continuous if it is regulated and continuous atright dense points (denoted as Crd(T)).

pre-differentiable on the region D if Tκ\D is countable and Dcontains no right scattered elements.

Theorem

Let f be regulated. Then there exists a pre-differentiable F withregion of differentiation D such that

F∆(t) = f (t) ∀t ∈ D.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Pre-Antiderivatives

A function f : T→ R is:

regulated if right hand limits are finite at right dense pointsand left hand limits are finite at left dense points.

right dense continuous if it is regulated and continuous atright dense points (denoted as Crd(T)).

pre-differentiable on the region D if Tκ\D is countable and Dcontains no right scattered elements.

Theorem

Let f be regulated. Then there exists a pre-differentiable F withregion of differentiation D such that

F∆(t) = f (t) ∀t ∈ D.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Pre-Antiderivatives

A function f : T→ R is:

regulated if right hand limits are finite at right dense pointsand left hand limits are finite at left dense points.

right dense continuous if it is regulated and continuous atright dense points (denoted as Crd(T)).

pre-differentiable on the region D if Tκ\D is countable and Dcontains no right scattered elements.

Theorem

Let f be regulated. Then there exists a pre-differentiable F withregion of differentiation D such that

F∆(t) = f (t) ∀t ∈ D.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Pre-Antiderivatives

A function f : T→ R is:

regulated if right hand limits are finite at right dense pointsand left hand limits are finite at left dense points.

right dense continuous if it is regulated and continuous atright dense points (denoted as Crd(T)).

pre-differentiable on the region D if Tκ\D is countable and Dcontains no right scattered elements.

Theorem

Let f be regulated. Then there exists a pre-differentiable F withregion of differentiation D such that

F∆(t) = f (t) ∀t ∈ D.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Antiderivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R be a regulated function and F be apre-differentiable function of f . Define the indefinite integral of fby ∫

f (t)∆t = F (t) + C .

Define the Cauchy integral by∫ s

rf (t)∆t = F (s)− F (r). ∀r , s ∈ T

Theorem

Every rd-continuous function has an antiderivative. If t0 ∈ T, then

F (t) :=∫ ttof (τ)∆τ for t ∈ T is an antiderivative of f .

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Existance of Antiderivatives

Definition

Let f : T→ R be a regulated function and F be apre-differentiable function of f . Define the indefinite integral of fby ∫

f (t)∆t = F (t) + C .

Define the Cauchy integral by∫ s

rf (t)∆t = F (s)− F (r). ∀r , s ∈ T

Theorem

Every rd-continuous function has an antiderivative. If t0 ∈ T, then

F (t) :=∫ ttof (τ)∆τ for t ∈ T is an antiderivative of f .

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Delta Integration

Theorem

If f ∈ Crd and t ∈ Tκ, then∫ σ(t)

tf (τ)∆τ = µ(t)f (t).

Corollary

If [a, b] consists of only isolated points, then

∫ b

af (t)∆t =

ρ(b)∑t=a

µ(t)f (t) : a < b

0 : a = b

−ρ(a)∑t=b

µ(t)f (t) : a > b.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Delta Integration

Theorem

If f ∈ Crd and t ∈ Tκ, then∫ σ(t)

tf (τ)∆τ = µ(t)f (t).

Corollary

If [a, b] consists of only isolated points, then

∫ b

af (t)∆t =

ρ(b)∑t=a

µ(t)f (t) : a < b

0 : a = b

−ρ(a)∑t=b

µ(t)f (t) : a > b.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Nabla Integration

Theorem

If f ∈ Cld and t ∈ Tκ, then∫ t

ρ(t)f (τ)∇τ = ν(t)f (t).

Corollary

If [a, b] consists of only isolated points, then

∫ b

af (t)∇t =

b∑t=σ(a)

ν(t)f (t) : a < b

0 : a = b

−a∑

t=σ(b)

ν(t)f (t) : a > b.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Nabla Integration

Theorem

If f ∈ Cld and t ∈ Tκ, then∫ t

ρ(t)f (τ)∇τ = ν(t)f (t).

Corollary

If [a, b] consists of only isolated points, then

∫ b

af (t)∇t =

b∑t=σ(a)

ν(t)f (t) : a < b

0 : a = b

−a∑

t=σ(b)

ν(t)f (t) : a > b.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Integrals

Proof.

We have ∫ tρ(t) f (τ)∇τ = F (t)− F (ρ(t))

= ν(t)F∇(t)= ν(t)f (t).

For a < b, ∫ ba f (τ)∇τ =

ρ(b)∑t=a

∫ σ(t)

tf (τ)∇τ

=

ρ(b)∑t=a

ν(σ(t))f (σ(t))

=b∑

t=σ(a)

ν(t)f (t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Integrals

Proof.

We have ∫ tρ(t) f (τ)∇τ = F (t)− F (ρ(t))

= ν(t)F∇(t)= ν(t)f (t).

For a < b, ∫ ba f (τ)∇τ =

ρ(b)∑t=a

∫ σ(t)

tf (τ)∇τ

=

ρ(b)∑t=a

ν(σ(t))f (σ(t))

=b∑

t=σ(a)

ν(t)f (t).

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula

Taylor’s Formula on R:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1(R). Fix s. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f (k)′(s)hk(t, s) +

∫ t

shn+1(t, τ)f (n+1)′(τ)dτ

where

h0(t, s) = 1,

hk+1(t, s) =∫ ts hk(τ, s)dτ, k ≥ 0.

When T = Rhk(t, s) = (t−s)k

k!

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula

Taylor’s Formula on R:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1(R). Fix s. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f (k)′(s)hk(t, s) +

∫ t

shn+1(t, τ)f (n+1)′(τ)dτ

where

h0(t, s) = 1,

hk+1(t, s) =∫ ts hk(τ, s)dτ, k ≥ 0.

When T = Rhk(t, s) = (t−s)k

k!

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula

Taylor’s Formula on R:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1(R). Fix s. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f (k)′(s)hk(t, s) +

∫ t

shn+1(t, τ)f (n+1)′(τ)dτ

where

h0(t, s) = 1,

hk+1(t, s) =∫ ts hk(τ, s)dτ, k ≥ 0.

When T = Rhk(t, s) = (t−s)k

k!

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula

Taylor’s Formula on R:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1(R). Fix s. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f (k)′(s)hk(t, s) +

∫ t

shn+1(t, τ)f (n+1)′(τ)dτ

where

h0(t, s) = 1,

hk+1(t, s) =∫ ts hk(τ, s)dτ, k ≥ 0.

When T = Rhk(t, s) = (t−s)k

k!

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula cont.

Taylor’s Formula on T for ∆ derivatives:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1rd (T). Fix s ∈ T. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f ∆k(s)hk∆(t, s) +

∫ t

sh(n+1)∆(t, σ(τ))f ∆n+1

(τ)∆τ

where

h0∆(t, s) = 1,

h(k+1)∆(t, s) =∫ ts hk∆(τ, s)∆τ, k ≥ 0.

hk∇(t, s) defined similarly.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula cont.

Taylor’s Formula on T for ∆ derivatives:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1rd (T). Fix s ∈ T. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f ∆k(s)hk∆(t, s) +

∫ t

sh(n+1)∆(t, σ(τ))f ∆n+1

(τ)∆τ

where

h0∆(t, s) = 1,

h(k+1)∆(t, s) =∫ ts hk∆(τ, s)∆τ, k ≥ 0.

hk∇(t, s) defined similarly.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula cont.

Taylor’s Formula on T for ∆ derivatives:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1rd (T). Fix s ∈ T. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f ∆k(s)hk∆(t, s) +

∫ t

sh(n+1)∆(t, σ(τ))f ∆n+1

(τ)∆τ

where

h0∆(t, s) = 1,

h(k+1)∆(t, s) =∫ ts hk∆(τ, s)∆τ, k ≥ 0.

hk∇(t, s) defined similarly.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Taylor Formula cont.

Taylor’s Formula on T for ∆ derivatives:

Theorem

Assume f ∈ Cn+1rd (T). Fix s ∈ T. Then

f (t) =n∑

k=0

f ∆k(s)hk∆(t, s) +

∫ t

sh(n+1)∆(t, σ(τ))f ∆n+1

(τ)∆τ

where

h0∆(t, s) = 1,

h(k+1)∆(t, s) =∫ ts hk∆(τ, s)∆τ, k ≥ 0.

hk∇(t, s) defined similarly.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

T = hZ = {0,±h,±2h,±3h, ...}

Example ([1])

For T = hZ and t > s,

hk∆(t, s) =

∏(k−1)i=0 (t − ih − s)

k!

Compute hk∆ for small k .

Identify a pattern.

Verify by Taylor’s Formula.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

T = hZ = {0,±h,±2h,±3h, ...}

Example ([1])

For T = hZ and t > s,

hk∆(t, s) =

∏(k−1)i=0 (t − ih − s)

k!

Compute hk∆ for small k .

Identify a pattern.

Verify by Taylor’s Formula.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

How to Find h2∇(t, s)

h1∇(t, s) = t − s

h2∇(t, s) =

∫ t

sh1∇(τ, s)∇τ

=t∑

σ(s)

h1∇(τ, s)ν(τ)

=t∑

σ(s)

(τ − s) · 1

=k∑

τ=1

τ

=k(k + 1)

2

=(t − s)(t − s + 1)

2

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

hk∇(t, s)

Example (B3)

For T = hZ and t > s,

hk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1i=0 (t + ih − s)

k!

Recall:

hk∆(t, s) =

∏(k−1)i=0 (t − ih − s)

k!

Differ by sign on ih

hk∆(t, s) is 0 for large k

hk∇(t, s) 6= 0 for large k

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

hk∇(t, s)

Example (B3)

For T = hZ and t > s,

hk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1i=0 (t + ih − s)

k!

Recall:

hk∆(t, s) =

∏(k−1)i=0 (t − ih − s)

k!

Differ by sign on ih

hk∆(t, s) is 0 for large k

hk∇(t, s) 6= 0 for large k

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

hk∇(t, s)

Example (B3)

For T = hZ and t > s,

hk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1i=0 (t + ih − s)

k!

Recall:

hk∆(t, s) =

∏(k−1)i=0 (t − ih − s)

k!

Differ by sign on ih

hk∆(t, s) is 0 for large k

hk∇(t, s) 6= 0 for large k

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

T = qZ

Example ([1])

For T = qZ and t > s,

hk∆(t, s) =k−1∏m=0

t − qmsm∑j=0

qj

Example (B3)

hk∇(t, s) =k−1∏m=0

tqm − sm∑j=0

qj

Similar to hZ.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

When t < s...

Define gk∆(t, s), gk∇(t, s) to be Taylor monomials when t < s.

Example (B3)

In hZ,gk∆(t, s) =

gk∇(t, s) =(−1)k

∏ki=0(s − t − ih)

(k − 1)!

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Comparisons

T = hZ

hk∆(t, s) =∏(k−1)

i=0 (t−ih−s)k! hk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1i=0 (t+ih−s)

k!

gk∆(t, s) =(−1)k

∏k−1i=0 (s+ih−t)k! gk∇(t, s) =

(−1)k∏k

i=0(s−t−ih)(k−1)!

T = qZ

hk∆(t, s) =∏k−1

m=0t−qmsm∑j=0

qjhk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1m=0

tqm−sm∑j=0

qj

gk∆(t, s) =∏k−1

m=0 s−qmtm∑j=0

qjgk∇(t, s) =

∏k−1m=0 sq

m−km∑j=0

qj

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Main Theorem

Theorem

Let T be an isolated or dense time scale, s ∈ Tκ, t ∈ Tκ, witht > s. Then

hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)

if

(hk∆(t, s))(µ(t)− ν(s)) = µ(t)hk∆(t, ρ(s))− ν(s)hk∆(σ(t), s)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.

Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ T

Assume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)

Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0

Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof of Main Theorem

Proof

We prove this by induction

Fix s, t ∈ T, with s < t.Base Case: h0∆(t, s) ≡ 1 ≡ g0∇(s, t) ∀t, s ∈ TAssume k th step: hk∆(t, s) = (−1)kgk∇(s, t)Need: hk+1∆(t, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t)

Show this by existence/uniqueness of solutions to differentialequations:

Note that hk+1∆(s, s) = (−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, s) = 0Consider the following differential equation:

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof Continued

Proof.

Computing the derivative gives

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

⇔ hk+1∆(t, s)− hk+1∆(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= (−1)k+1gk∇(s, t)

Inserting the inductive hypothesis and inserting the definitionof hk∆(t, s):

hk+1δ(t, s)− hk+1δ(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= −(hk∆(σ(t), s)− hk∆(t, s))

µ(t)

Algebraic rearrangement gives

(hk∆(t, s))(µ(t)− ν(s)) = µ(t)hk∆(t, ρ(s))− ν(s)hk∆(σ(t), s)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof Continued

Proof.

Computing the derivative gives

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

⇔ hk+1∆(t, s)− hk+1∆(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= (−1)k+1gk∇(s, t)

Inserting the inductive hypothesis and inserting the definitionof hk∆(t, s):

hk+1δ(t, s)− hk+1δ(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= −(hk∆(σ(t), s)− hk∆(t, s))

µ(t)

Algebraic rearrangement gives

(hk∆(t, s))(µ(t)− ν(s)) = µ(t)hk∆(t, ρ(s))− ν(s)hk∆(σ(t), s)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof Continued

Proof.

Computing the derivative gives

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

⇔ hk+1∆(t, s)− hk+1∆(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= (−1)k+1gk∇(s, t)

Inserting the inductive hypothesis and inserting the definitionof hk∆(t, s):

hk+1δ(t, s)− hk+1δ(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= −(hk∆(σ(t), s)− hk∆(t, s))

µ(t)

Algebraic rearrangement gives

(hk∆(t, s))(µ(t)− ν(s)) = µ(t)hk∆(t, ρ(s))− ν(s)hk∆(σ(t), s)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Proof Continued

Proof.

Computing the derivative gives

(hk+1∆(t, s))∇s = ((−1)k+1gk+1∇(s, t))∇s

⇔ hk+1∆(t, s)− hk+1∆(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= (−1)k+1gk∇(s, t)

Inserting the inductive hypothesis and inserting the definitionof hk∆(t, s):

hk+1δ(t, s)− hk+1δ(t, ρ(s))

ν(s)= −(hk∆(σ(t), s)− hk∆(t, s))

µ(t)

Algebraic rearrangement gives

(hk∆(t, s))(µ(t)− ν(s)) = µ(t)hk∆(t, ρ(s))− ν(s)hk∆(σ(t), s)

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Future Research

Taylor Monomials on non-isolated Time Scales.

Fourier and Laplacian Analysis on Time Scales.

Multivariate Taylor Expansions.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Future Research

Taylor Monomials on non-isolated Time Scales.

Fourier and Laplacian Analysis on Time Scales.

Multivariate Taylor Expansions.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Future Research

Taylor Monomials on non-isolated Time Scales.

Fourier and Laplacian Analysis on Time Scales.

Multivariate Taylor Expansions.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Future Research

Taylor Monomials on non-isolated Time Scales.

Fourier and Laplacian Analysis on Time Scales.

Multivariate Taylor Expansions.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

References

Reagan J. Higgins and Allan Peterson. Cauchy Functions andTaylor’s Formula for Time Scales. Department ofMathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

M. Bohner and A. Peterson, Dynamic Equations On TimeScales: An Introduction With Applications, Birkhauser,Boston, 2001.

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

Special Thanks To...

National Science Foundation

Dr. Nathan Pennington

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials

????

Thank you!

Any questions?

P. Ballesteros, J. Batista, S. Bell Taylor Monomials


Recommended