+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Date post: 30-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: cmselearning
View: 69 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
28
For distribution only in markets where the Resolute Integrity coronary stent has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2011 Medtronic, Inc. All Rights Reserved. UC201202755EE 10/11 Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. For distribution only in markets where the Resolute Integrity coronary stent has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2012 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201303198EE 10/12 TCT 2012 Highlights
Transcript
Page 1: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

For d

istri

butio

n on

ly in

mar

kets

whe

re th

e R

esol

ute

Inte

grity

cor

onar

y st

ent h

as b

een

appr

oved

. Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

1 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

Rig

hts

Res

erve

d. U

C20

1202

755E

E 1

0/11

Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. For distribution only in markets where the Resolute Integrity coronary stent has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2012 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201303198EE 10/12

TCT 2012 Highlights

Page 2: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Resolute Integrity™ DES: Simplify the Challenge TCT 2012 Highlights

• RESOLUTE Pooled DAPT analysis• When interrupted 1 month after the procedure (including those that permanently

discontinued), the ST rate with Resolute™ DES was 0%*

• Strength in real world• Powerful TWENTE 2-year results continue to confirm Resolute DES real-world

performance• Excellent, long-term outcomes in all-comers RESOLUTE International 3-year results

• Strength in challenging subgroups• Very low event rates seen in RESOLUTE Pooled Small Vessel program and 38-mm

Long Lesion subgroup• Powerful performance seen in diabetic subset within this challenging subgroup, with no

difference to nondiabetics.

*ESC guidelines recommend a DAPT duration of 6–12 months after DES implantation in all patients and 1 year after ACS, irrespective of the type of implanted stent.

Page 3: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Recent DAPT Interruption Data on Second-Generation DESXience V™ DES, Tullio Palmerini, Presented at PCR 2012

DAPT Interruption

Page 4: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

RESOLUTE DAPT Interruption Analysis MethodologyDAPT Interruption

* Serruys PW et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:136–146. † Silber S, et al. The Lancet. 2011;377:1241–1247. ‡ Neumann FJ et al. EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1181–1188. §Yeung AC et al. JACC. 2011;57:1778–1783.

• Studies chosen due to quality of data on DAPT usage

• This pooled analysis included the following patients: 30.2% diabetics, 25.9% prior PCI, 45.1% ACS, RVD = 2.78±0.51mm, LL = 15.75±9.53 mm, 66.6% B2/C lesions

• All DAPT interruption was defined as a patient who stopped DAPT for more than 1 day, including those who never resumed.

• The analysis aimed to evaluate the 1-year rate of definite/probable ST for patients who had a DAPT interruption compared with those who continued DAPT without any interruption through 12 months.

RESOLUTE AC*† 1:1 RCT vs. Xience V™ EES (R = 1140; X = 1152) 3 yr

NonRCT Observational (R = 2349) 3 yr

2.25–4.00-mm NonRCT vs. Hx Control (R = 1402) 2 yrRESOLUTE US§

2.50–3.50-mm NonRCT (R = 100) vs. Hx ControlRESOLUTE Japan 2 yr

RESOLUTE Int‡

Pooled Patient-Level Data: N= ~5000

Page 5: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

0% ST Rate in Patients Interrupting DAPT Beyond 3 MonthsRESOLUTE Pooled DAPT Analysis

DAPT Interruption

Page 6: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

0% ST With First DAPT Interruption Between 1–12 MonthsRESOLUTE Pooled DAPT Analysis

DAPT Interruption

Page 7: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

1º endpoint: TVFcardiac death, TVMI, clinically driven TVR at 12 mo2º endpoints: Components of TVF, ARC ST, patient-oriented composite Major exclusion criteria: STEMI within 48 hr requiring primary PCI

TWENTEN = 1391

PI: C. von BirgelenThoraxcentrum Twente,

Enschede, the Netherlands

Resolute™ DESn = 697

Xience V™ DESn = 694

TWENTE Study: Independent, Real-World Study

30 d 2 yr12 moClinicalFollow-Up

Real-World1:1 randomised, noninferiority trial

(no lesion/vessel limitations)

TWENTE

Similar Trial Design to RESOLUTE All Comers

von Birgelen et al. The TWENTE  Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(15):1350-1361.Study received an unrestricted grant from Medtronic Inc. and Abbott Laboratories.

Page 8: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Variable (%)

Resolute™ ZES(N = 697)

Xience V™ EES(N = 694) p-Value

Age (yr) 63.9 64.5 0.32Female 27.5 27.4 0.94Diabetes mellitus 22.7 20.6 0.35Arterial hypertension 55.4 55.8 0.89Hypercholesterolemia 57.0 61.4 0.10Current smoker 25.3 23.6 0.48Prior PCI 19.9 21.5 0.48Acute coronary syndrome 51.9 51.2 0.47

Unstable angina 24.7 22.0 0.47Non-ST-elevation-MI 27.3 29.1 0.47

Multivessel treatment 25.0 23.3 0.48At least one bifurcation 25.7 26.4 0.77At least one CTO 7.3 6.3 0.47At least one in-stent restenosis 5.2 4.8 0.73At least one small vessel (RVD <2.75 mm) 63.8 61.8 0.43At least one long lesion (<27 mm) 22.4 19.7 0.23Complex Patients* 78.5 76.4 0.35

Patient Baseline and Lesion CharacteristicsTWENTE

*Complex patient definition: bifurcation, bypass grafts, ISR, AMI <72 hr, LVEF <30%, unprotected LM, >2 vessels stented, renal insufficiency or failure (creatinine >140 µmol/L), lesion length >27 mm, >1 lesion per vessel, lesion with thrombus or TO (preprocedure TIMI = 0). Resolute Integrity™ DES is currently not specifically approved for use in LVEF, renal insufficiency, unprotected left main or bypass grafts.

Page 9: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Low, Similar Results for Resolute™ DES and Xience V™ DES TWENTE

Page 10: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Similar Outcomes at 2 Years for Resolute™ DESvs. Xience V™ DESComponents of Target Vessel Failure (TVF)

TWENTE

Page 11: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Low Rates of ST in Independent, Real-World StudyTWENTE

Page 12: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Variable (%)

TWENTE(N = 1391)

RESOLUTE All Comers(N = 2292)

Age (yr) (mean ± SD) 64.2 64.23 ± 10.8Female 27.5 23.1Diabetes mellitus 21.6 23.5Hypertension 55.6 71.2Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 20.7 32.0Acute coronary syndrome 51.5 48.0

Unstable angina 23.4 19.2Non-ST-elevation-MI 28.2 13.9ST-elevation-MI NA 15.0

Multivessel treatment 24.0 24.9Lesion length (mm) 14.4 12.02 ± 7.68RVD (mm) 2.65 2.63 ± 0.57At least one bifurcation 26.0 17.3 At least one in-stent restenosis 5.0 8.0At least one small vessel (RVD <2.75 mm) 62.8 67.6At least one long lesion (>27 mm) 21.1 6.3Complex Patients* 77.4 66.3

Patient Baseline and Lesion CharacteristicsTWENTE and RESOLUTE All Comers

TWENTE

*Complex patient definition: bifurcation, bypass grafts, ISR, AMI <72 hr, LVEF <30%, unprotected LM, >2 vessels stented, renal insufficiency or failure (creatinine >140 µmol/L), lesion length >27 mm, >1 lesion per vessel, lesion with thrombus or TO (preprocedure TIMI = 0). Resolute Integrity™ DES is currently not specifically approved for use in LVEF, renal insufficiency, unprotected left main or bypass grafts.

Page 13: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

TWENTE Continues to Confirm RESOLUTE All Comers Results at 2 Years

TWENTE

Page 14: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

RESOLUTE International Trial Design

Primary endpoint: Composite of cardiac death and target vessel MI at 12 moKey secondary endpoint: ARC definite/probable stent thrombosis at 12 moDrug therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlopidine ≥6 mo (per guidelines)

Real-World (Open Label)All patients with symptomatic coronary artery

disease eligible for DES implantation(no lesion/vessel limitations)

6 mo 3 yr2 yr12 moClinical endpoints

30 d

Resolute™ DESn = 2200

88 international sites (Europe, Asia, Africa and South America)No angiographic follow-up

100% independent clinical event adjudication25% randomly assigned to 100% monitoring

PI: J. Belardi, F-J. Neumann, P. Widimský

Prospective, Multicentre, Real-World Study

RESOLUTE International

Page 15: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Enrollment Reflects Real-World PracticeSimilar Baseline Characteristics of RESOLUTE International and RESOLUTE All Comers

RESOLUTE International RESOLUTE All ComersResolute™ DES

(n = 2349)Resolute DES

(n = 1140)Xience V™ DES

(n = 1152)

Age (yr) 63.4 ± 11.2 64.4 ± 10.9 64.2 ± 10.8Men (%) 77.8 76.7 77.2Diabetes mellitus (%) 30.4 23.5 23.4 Insulin dependent (%) 8.9 8.4 7.1Prior MI (%) 27.0 28.9 30.4Unstable angina (%) 26.1 19.4 18.9AMI (within 12 hr) (%) 9.7 15.4 17.8AMI (within 72 hr) (%) 20.0 28.9 28.8Lesions treated per patient 1.3 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.7 1.5 ± 0.8Multivessel treated (%) 14.0 25.0 25.0Small vessel (RVD ≤2.75 mm) 45.4 67.8 67.4Long lesion (length >18 mm) 46.1 18.2 21.2In-stent restenosis (%) 7.6 8.1 8.0Bifurcation/trifurcation (%) 18.2 16.9 17.7Total occlusion (%) 6.3 16.3 17.2

Complex Patients*(%) 67.5 67.0 65.6

RESOLUTE International

*Complex patient definition: bifurcation, bypass grafts, ISR, AMI <72 hr, LVEF <30%, unprotected LM, >2 vessels stented, renal insufficiency or failure (creatinine >140 µmol/L), lesion length >27 mm, >1 lesion per vessel, lesion with thrombus or TO (preprocedure TIMI = 0). Resolute Integrity™ DES is currently not specifically approved for use in LVEF, renal insufficiency, unprotected left main or bypass grafts.

Page 16: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Excellent Safety and Efficacy Clinical OutcomesSustained Low Event Rates Out to 3 Years

RESOLUTE International

Page 17: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

0% Stent Thrombosis for Patients Interrupting DAPT at 3 MonthsRESOLUTE International Consistent with Pooled RESOLUTE 3 M DAPT Analysis

RESOLUTE International

Page 18: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

No Stent Thrombosis in Patients Interrupting DAPT Beyond 1 MonthRESOLUTE International Consistent with Pooled RESOLULTE 3 M DAPT Analysis

RESOLUTE International

Page 19: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

RESOLUTE PooledSmall Vessel SubgroupPatients with vessel diameter ≤2.5mm

RESOLUTE Pooled,SV Subgroup

RESOLUTE NonRCT First-in-Human (R = 139)

RESOLUTE All Comers 1:1 RCT vs. Xience V™ (R = 1140; X = 1152)

RESOLUTE International NonRCT Observational (R = 2349)

RESOLUTE US 2.25–4.00-mm Non-RCT (R = 1402)38-mm Substudy NonRCT vs. PG (R = 114)

RESOLUTE Japan 2.50–3.50-mm NonRCT (R = 100) vs. Hx Control

R-Japan SVS 2.25-mm NonRCT vs. PG (R ≈ 63)

RESOLUTE Asia NonRCT (R ≈ 300)

R-China Registry Registry (R = 1800 max)

R-China RCT 1:1 RCT vs. Taxus™ DES (R = 200; T = 200)

1956 Small Vessel Patients from theFollowing Highlighted Trials

Page 20: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

%

RVD ≤2.50 mm

N = 1956

RVD >2.50 mm

N = 3174 p-Value

Age (yr) 64.7 ± 10.9 63.3 ± 11.0 <0.001

Male 71.4 77.0 <0.001

Diabetes mellitus 34.4 27.2 <0.001

IDDM 10.8 7.7 <0.001

Hypertension 77.0 71.1 <0.001

Hyperlipidemia 76.5 68.5 <0.001

Current smoker 20.9 25.4

Prior MI 27.3 25.9 0.295

Prior PCI 33.1 29.5 0.007

Prior CABG 9.1 8.2 0.281

History of stroke or TIA 7.3 4.9 0.064

Clinical status: <0.001

Stable angina 39.5 37.9

Unstable angina 26.7 25.4

Myocardial infarction 19.9 24.0

RESOLUTE Pooled,SV SubgroupPatient Baseline and Lesion Characteristics

Higher Comorbidities seen in Small Vessel Subgroup

RVD ≤2.50 mmN = 1956

Patients, 2974 Lesions

RVD >2.50 mmN = 3174

Patients, 3884 Lesions p-Value

Number of diseased vessels (>50%) <0.001

Single 48.5 58.7

Double 33.7 27.7

Triple 17.0 13.2

Lesion location (%)

LAD 54.1 46.6 <0.001

LCx 41.4 22.9 <0.001

RCA 28.3 36.7 <0.001

Left Main 1.0 2.4 <0.001

RVD* (mm) 2.4 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.4 <0.001

MLD* (mm) 0.6 ± 0.4 0.7 ± 0.5 0.002

Lesion length* (mm) 14.7 ± 9.2 16.5 ± 9.6 <0.001

% diameter stenosis* 72.8 ± 16.3 77.7 ± 16.1 <0.001

Patient Characteristics Lesion Characteristics

*For RESOLUTE International (R-Int), angiographic measurements are site reported.

Page 21: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Low Event Rates Across Small Vessel SubgroupNo Difference Seen in SV and Overall Population at 24 Months

RESOLUTE Pooled,SV Subgroup

Page 22: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

No Statistical Differences Between Diabetic and Nondiabetic PatientsLow Event Rates Across Diabetic Small Vessel Subgroup

RESOLUTE Pooled,SV Subgroup

Page 23: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

RESOLUTE Pooled—38-mm Subgroup

Meredith IT et al. EuroIntervention. 2010;5:692–697. Serruys PW et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:136–146. Silber S, et al. The Lancet. 2011;377:1241–47. Neumann FJ et al. EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10):1181–1188. Yeung AC et al. JACC. 2011;57:1778–1783.

RESOLUTE Pooled,38 mm Subgroup

223 Patients from the Following Highlighted Trials

RESOLUTE NonRCT First-in-Human (R = 139)

RESOLUTE All Comers 1:1 RCT vs. Xience V™ (R = 1140; X = 1152)

RESOLUTE International NonRCT Observational (R = 2349)

RESOLUTE US 2.25–4.00-mm NonRCT (R = 1402)38-mm Substudy NonRCT vs. PG (R = 114)

RESOLUTE Japan 2.50–3.50-mm NonRCT (R = 100) vs. Hx Control

R-Japan SVS 2.25-mm NonRCT vs. PG (R ≈ 63)

RESOLUTE Asia NonRCT (R ≈ 300)

R-China Registry Registry (R = 1800 max)

R-China RCT 1:1 RCT vs. Taxus™ DES (R = 200; T = 200)

Page 24: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Patient and Lesion Characteristics

RESOLUTE 38 mm

% N = 223 Patients

Age (yr) 60.9 ± 10.6

Male 78.9

Diabetes mellitus 37.7

IDDM 10.3

Hypertension 74.9

Hyperlipidemia 58.7

Current smoker 18.8

Prior MI 32.4

Prior PCI 27.4

Cardiac status:

Stable angina 39.2

Unstable angina 47.4

Myocardial infarction 13.4

RESOLUTE 38 mmN = 223 Patients,

269 Lesions

Number of multi-vessel (≥2) vessels 53.8

Lesion locationLAD 52.0

LCx 20.2

RCA 44.4

Lesion lengthDiscrete (<10 mm) 4.6

Tubular (10-19.9 mm) 24.5

Diffuse (≥20 mm) 70.9

Branch vessel disease 47.9

B2/C lesion 91.2

Lesion length (mm) 25.22 ± 8.83

RVD (mm) 2.78 ± 0.42

MLD (mm) 0.80 ± 0.36

Preprocedure % diameter stenosis 71.33 ± 11.61

QCA measurements may have been made by careful visual estimate, online QCA or IVUS.

RESOLUTE 38 mm Subgroup

Complex Challenging Anatomies With >35% Diabetics and >90% B2/C Lesions

Page 25: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

RESOLUTE 38-mm Subgroup Demonstrates Significantly Lower TLF Rate vs. Performance GoalExtremely Low Event Rates in Challenging Patients

RESOLUTE 38 mm

Page 26: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Low Rates in Challenging Diabetic PopulationNo Differences in Diabetics and Nondiabetics Subgroup

RESOLUTE 38 mm

Page 27: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trad

emar

ks m

ay b

e re

gist

ered

and

are

the

prop

erty

of t

heir

resp

ectiv

e ow

ners

. Fo

r dis

tribu

tion

only

in m

arke

ts w

here

the

Res

olut

e In

tegr

ity c

oron

ary

sten

t has

bee

n ap

prov

ed.

Not

for d

istri

butio

n in

the

US

A or

Jap

an. ©

201

2 M

edtro

nic,

Inc.

All

right

s re

serv

ed. U

C20

1303

198E

E 1

0/12

Resolute Integrity™ DES: Simplify the Challenge TCT 2012 Highlights

• RESOLUTE Pooled DAPT analysis• When interrupted 1 month after the procedure (including those that permanently

discontinued), the ST rate with Resolute™ DES was 0%*

• Strength in real world• Powerful TWENTE 2-year results continue to confirm Resolute DES real-world

performance• Excellent, long-term outcomes in all-comers RESOLUTE International 3-year results

• Strength in challenging subgroups• Very low event rates seen in RESOLUTE Pooled Small Vessel program and 38-mm

Long Lesion subgroup• Powerful performance seen in diabetic subset within this challenging subgroup, with no

difference to nondiabetics.

*ESC guidelines recommend a DAPT duration of 6–12 months after DES implantation in all patients and 1 year after ACS, irrespective of the type of implanted stent.

Page 28: Tct 2012 Msg Deck (Ous)

Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. For distribution only in markets where the Resolute Integrity coronary stent has been approved. Not for distribution in the USA or Japan. © 2012 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved. UC201303198EE 10/12


Recommended