+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

Date post: 28-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: kareemece2007nsn
View: 555 times
Download: 30 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
66
TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1 Nokia Siemens Networks TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 1 (66) Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks. This material, including documentation and any related computer programs, is protected by copyright controlled by Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights are reserved. Copying, including reproducing, storing, adapting or translating, any or all of this material requires the prior written consent of Nokia Siemens Networks. This material also contains confidential information which may not be disclosed to others without the prior written consent of Nokia Siemens Networks.
Transcript
Page 1: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Nokia Siemens Networks

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 1 (52)

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks. This material, including documentation and any related computer programs, is protected by copyright controlled by Nokia Siemens Networks. All rights are reserved. Copying, including reproducing, storing, adapting or translating, any or all of this material requires the prior written consent of Nokia Siemens Networks. This material also contains confidential information which may not be disclosed to others without the prior written consent of Nokia Siemens Networks.

Page 2: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Revision History

Date Revision Revison History Author

2011-12-1 V1.0 Draft version Zhengwei Gao

2012-1-12 V1.1

Add Chapter 1 introducing main purpose of the document to avoid any ambiguity and misunderstanding.

Add hyperlinks of reference materials to Chapter 6 so that people can find them more easily.

Other minor changes.

Zhengwei Gao

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 2 (52)

Page 3: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Table of Contents

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD.......................................................................................1

Revision History........................................................................................................................................... 2

Table of Contents........................................................................................................................................ 3

Glossary...................................................................................................................................................... 5

List of Figures.............................................................................................................................................. 6

List of Tables............................................................................................................................................... 7

1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 8

2 KPI Overview........................................................................................................................................ 8

2.1 KPI Categories............................................................................................................................. 8

2.1.1 Accessibility............................................................................................................................. 8

2.1.2 Retainability (Reliability)...........................................................................................................9

2.1.3 Throughput............................................................................................................................... 9

2.1.4 Latency.................................................................................................................................... 9

2.1.5 Mobility................................................................................................................................... 10

2.2 Services Levels.......................................................................................................................... 10

2.3 Field and Network KPIs.............................................................................................................11

3 Field KPIs........................................................................................................................................... 11

3.1 Field KPI Definitions................................................................................................................... 11

3.1.1 (FTP) Service Accessibility Ratio...........................................................................................12

3.1.2 (FTP) Completed Session Ratio............................................................................................13

3.1.3 (FTP) Single User Throughput...............................................................................................14

3.1.4 Attach Time............................................................................................................................ 16

3.1.5 Attach Success Rate..............................................................................................................18

3.1.6 Service Request (EPS) Time, UE Initiated.............................................................................19

3.1.7 Service Request (EPS) Success Rate...................................................................................22

3.1.8 Service (EPS Bearer) Drop Rate...........................................................................................23

3.1.9 Handover Procedure Time.....................................................................................................24

3.1.10 Handover Success Rate....................................................................................................25

3.1.11 (LTE) Round Trip Time......................................................................................................26

3.1.12 (LTE) Single User Throughput...........................................................................................27

3.1.13 (LTE) Service Interrupt Time (HO).....................................................................................28

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 3 (52)

Page 4: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.14 (RB) Single User Throughput.............................................................................................29

3.1.15 Cell Throughput..................................................................................................................30

3.2 Test Conditions and Target Values............................................................................................31

4 Network KPIs...................................................................................................................................... 32

4.1 Network KPI Definitions.............................................................................................................32

4.2 Test Conditions and Target Values............................................................................................33

5 Appendix I: Trial Network KPIs...........................................................................................................34

5.1 CMCC Large Scale Trial............................................................................................................34

5.1.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration.......................................................................34

5.1.2 Field Results.......................................................................................................................... 35

5.2 Bharti Airtel Trial........................................................................................................................ 39

5.2.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration.......................................................................39

5.2.2 Field Results.......................................................................................................................... 40

5.3 Maxis Aircel Trial........................................................................................................................ 42

5.3.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration.......................................................................42

5.3.2 Field Results.......................................................................................................................... 44

5.4 Voentelecom Russia.................................................................................................................. 46

5.4.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration.......................................................................46

5.4.2 Field Results.......................................................................................................................... 47

5.5 Appendix II: Early Network KPIs................................................................................................49

5.5.1 STC Saudi.............................................................................................................................. 49

5.5.2 Sky Brazil............................................................................................................................... 49

6 References......................................................................................................................................... 49

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 4 (52)

Page 5: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Glossary

IBLER Initial BLock Error Rate

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 5 (52)

Page 6: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

List of Figures

Figure 1 LTE Bearer Service Architecture.................................................................................................10

Figure 2 Attach Procedure with Initial EPS Bearer Establishment (3GPP 23.401)....................................18

Figure 3 EPS Bearer Setup Procedure, Part I...........................................................................................21

Figure 4 EPS Bearer Setup Procedure, Part II..........................................................................................22

Figure 5 Test Environment of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou........................................................34

Figure 6 Test Environment of Bharti Airtel TD-LTE Trial............................................................................39

Figure 7 Test Environment of Maxis Aircel TD-LTE Trial...........................................................................43

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 6 (52)

Page 7: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

List of Tables

Table 1 List of Field KPIs........................................................................................................................... 12

Table 2 List of Network KPIs..................................................................................................................... 33

Table 3 Baseline Configuration of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou.................................................34

Table 4 Field Results of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou................................................................35

Table 5 Baseline Configuration of Bharti Airtel TD-LTE Trial.....................................................................39

Table 6 Baseline Configuration of Maxis Aircel TD-LTE Trial....................................................................43

Table 7 Baseline Configuration of Voentelecom TD-LTE Trial..................................................................46

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 7 (52)

Page 8: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

1 Introduction

This document is focused on what kind of KPI values can be achieved in TD-LTE with certain network configurations by collecting KPIs from trial networks and commercial networks. It can be seen as a complementary to [3], in which the KPI targets mainly come from lab tests and/or system-level simulations. KPIs from this document can be taken as the baseline KPIs which are useful for KPI negotiation with our customers and for KPI optimization.

This document doesn’t actually contain any approaches or methods which can be used in network optimization phase. Please refer to [5] for optimization guidelines for TDDFDD- LTE which is a counterpart of the FDD. Unfortunately, there is no official version for TDD-LTE version [6]yet.

KPIs in this document are specified for RL15TD.

This document is organized as follow:

Chapter 1: This chapter gives an introduction to main purpose of this document.

Chapter 2: This chapter gives an overview of KPIs in LTE, including KPI categories, KPI hierarchies and general information about field KPI and network KPI.

Chapter 3: This chapter firstly introduces which kinds of field KPIs are interested and their definitions, and the second part summarizes field KPI baselines and conditions to achieve the expected KPIs.

Chapter 4: This chapter firstly introduces which kinds of network KPIs are interested and their definitions, and the second part summarizes network KPI baselines and conditions to achieve the expected KPIs.

Chapter 5: This chapter compiles achieved KPIs from global TD-LTE trial networks and early networks.

Chapter 6: This chapter contains a list of useful reference materials.

2 KPI Overview

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are a set of selected indicators used for measuring the network performance which determine the quality of a network.

They are used during RFI/ RFQ phases and during the network/cluster acceptance process. Additionally, network KPIs can be used to monitor a network continuously and warn in time about potential problems.

2.1 KPI Categories

There are several KPIs categories defined, each one looking at a different performance aspect. The names indicate the respective category according to 3GPP 32.410 and 32.450. The names in brackets indicate the terminology commonly used if different from 3GPP.

2.1.1 Accessibility

Accessibility KPIs characterize the availability of a service, or service element to its users. They are expressed as a ratio of successful service requests to the total number of attempts. E.g. Call success ratio.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 8 (52)

Page 9: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Service request attempts, which are rejected due to insufficient access rights, bad user authentication, or errors in request parameters are not considered and should be taken out of the samples used for calculating the metric.

2.1.2 Retainability (Reliability)

Reliability KPIs can be referred to Service Drop Rates or to Transport Error Rates, that is, the ratio between erroneous or lost data units and the overall number of data units sent. The Service Drop Rates KPIs (i.e. drop rates) can be measured in the field with an FMT (Field Measurement Tool). They represent the ratio between unsuccessful (‘abnormal’) terminations of a service request (e.g. network attach, register, service request) to the overall established services.

For certain services, like bearer creation or VoIP call the service drop rate is also related to the duration of the session. This is motivated by the fact that the possibility of network errors, e.g. hand-over failures is higher if the service duration is longer. In this case, the drop ratio is expressed in [1/s] units instead of [%].

As always-on connectivity is the basic idea for LTE, traditional CDR KPIs may cause abnormal results. CDR per Data Volume has been proposed to solve this problem.

2.1.3 Throughput

Throughput KPIs show the data rates that can be provided to the users of a cell under different radio conditions. The location of the UE in the cell and the number of active UEs in that cell will strongly influence the data rate that can be experienced by one user.

Peak/Average cell throughputs and peak user throughputs are the metrics that characterize the capacity of an LTE network, and the average UL/DL user throughputs along a drive route (i.e. under different radio conditions) represent the end user experience. However, only cell throughput and peak user throughput metrics will be covered in this document.

2.1.4 Latency

Latency KPIs in this document are referred to RTT (Round Trip Time) measurements and to signalling procedures (e.g. setup times)

RTT for data applications is measured with the Ping application of the UEs operating system or with a comparable measurement tool. It records the time difference between sending an ICMP Echo Request to an IP host and the reception of the corresponding ICMP Echo Reply message.

The measurement can be executed between a mobile terminal and an IP host, which is configured to respond to ICMP Echo Requests.

The test is to be done for stationary and mobile end users. The measurement with stationary UE should be performed under average radio link conditions with normal SINR.

As mentioned above, the latency category also refers to the time for signalling procedures on the network or on application level (e.g. RAB service setup, VoIP call setup flow). In case of measuring latencies over the radio link, the time needed to attach the mobile to the network and to setup the necessary radio resources is a significant component.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 9 (52)

Page 10: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

2.1.5 Mobility

Mobility KPIs build a group because all of them are related to hand-over procedures. They could, however, be discussed in the Latency and Accessibility groups as well, because HO-related KPIs are either service interrupt time or success ratio type KPIs.A successful handover is understood to be any successfully performed make before break procedure and it is marked by an entry in the log, which carries the identifier of the new cell (destination).

2.2 Services Levels

In addition to the different categories, KPIs are also defined for different service levels as per 3GPP 36.300. These are:

Application Services

LTE E2E Network Service

Radio Bearer (RB) Service

IP based LTE Bearer Services: X2, S1, S5/S8 and external

Figure 1 shows the LTE Bearer Service Architecture where the KPIs categories above can be mapped into.

Figure 1 LTE Bearer Service Architecture

When it comes to field performance evaluation the most interesting KPIs are the “LTE E2E Network Service” KPIs as they characterize the overall LTE network performance. Another important group is the

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 10 (52)

Page 11: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Application Service KPIs as they show the user’s perceived quality of application services as impacted by the LTE network. The KPIs of this group are service specific. The services of common interest for mobile network operators and therefore, the ones that can be of interest during an acceptance process are:

Web Browsing (HTTP)

Data Upload / Download (FTP)

Email (POP/SMTP)

Conversational Audio Video (VoIP)

The current document concentrates on the Data Upload / Download application service.

2.3 Field and Network KPIs

Field KPIs are the scope of drive testing campaigns either in a trial network or in a live network. They are also called drive test KPIs and can be obtained with a FMT, whereas network KPIs are based on counters collected via NetAct.

Drive test KPIs measurements are recommended in all types of projects (trial, roll-out, swap and optimization). They reflect the network performance along the different drive routes and somehow, reflect the end user experience. They can also be collected in static or indoor locations (e.g. airports, shopping centres, office buildings). However, drive testing campaigns are expensive, time consuming and cannot cover the whole network as the NetAct measurements do. Self-optimization related features in later releases, part of the SON concept, may have an impact on the amount and need of drive testing.

Network KPIs do have statistical significance only if the traffic levels are high enough. This is a reason why, especially during the cluster acceptance process when there is not enough load in the network, the network KPIs may not reflect the network performance and the acceptance process should be based on field KPIs. With the network KPIs it is also unknown if the users causing bad statistical data samples are well inside the coverage area or at the coverage borders. However, network KPIs can be used to monitor networks permanently and highlight potential problems.

Network KPIs are valid and recommended in swap and optimization cases where networks are supposed to be mature and with enough traffic to provide reliable results. In future swap cases (too early at the moment), network KPIs shouldn’t be used to compare with other vendors KPIs as counters and counter triggering conditions are likely to be different.

3 Field KPIs

3.1 Field KPI Definitions

The defined field KPI lists do not present by any means a complete set of KPIs to be used in a customer case. It is the project team/CBT responsibility to define and agree with the customer the final list of KPIs to be used in each and every case.

The measurement procedure of each KPI is just informative, actual test procedure depends on customer’s requirements and may quite different from what has been stated here.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 11 (52)

Page 12: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

The most interested field KPIs are listed below:

Table 1 List of Field KPIs

KPI NameKPI Category

Application Services

PS Data Services (FTP, HTTP etc)

Service Accessibility Ratio [%] Accessibility

Completed Session Ratio [%] Reliability

Single User Throughput [Mbps] Throughput

LTE E2E Network Service

Control Plane

Attach Time [ms] Latency

Attach Success Rate [%] Accessibility

Service Request (EPS) Time [ms] LatencyService Request (EPS) Success Rate [%] Accessibility

Service (EPS) Drop Rate [%] Reliability

Handover Procedure Time [ms] Latency

Handover Success Rate [%] Accessibility

User Plane(LTE) Round Trip Time (RTT) [ms] Latency

(LTE) Single User Throughput [Mbps] Throughput

(LTE) Service Interrupt Time (HO) [ms] Latency

Radio Bearer Services

User Plane(RB) Single User Throughput [Mbps] Throughput

Cell Throughput [Mbps] Throughput

Note that: ‘Single User Throughput’ KPI can be specified on each protocol layer, such as application layer, IP layer, L2 layer (i.e. PDCP/RLC/MAC layer) and L1 layer (i.e. physical layer).

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 12 (52)

Page 13: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.1 (FTP) Service Accessibility Ratio

(FTP) Service Accessibility Ratio [%]

Definition It denotes the probability that the user can establish the necessary bearer (EPS) and access the FTP service successfully.

Service access covers starting the FTP client on the UE, setting up mobile access and creating a TCP connection to the FTP server.

Measurement methodology 1. Set the FMT to generate calls to the FTP Server automatically with the following script/sequence:

a. Connection attempt (network attach)b. Log into the FTP Serverc. FTP Download 800MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)d. Wait 3 sec. after session finishese. FTP Upload 300MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)f. Log out the FTP Server If UE gets into UE deregistered status

between calls, this test also valid to check the Attach Success Rate

g. Connection release (network detach)h. Leave 5 seconds before start next sessioni. Repeat all previous steps (from ‘a’)

2. Continue drive testing till the drive route is completed. 3. Stop the FMT at the end of the route.4. If the route does not generate more than 100 calls repeat the

measurement on the same measurement route.5. The FMT shall record the CRS RSRP, RSRQ and CRS SINR during the

measurement.6. Verify the PS Data Call success rate as per formula below

Formula (logical)FtpCmdSR=

numberof (successful FTP commands)numberof (total FTP commands)

∗100 %

Assumptions, pre-conditions The FTP transfer shall be executed in binary mode.

Preconditions: UE EMM-DEREGISTERED

Message flow, trigger points Trigger points:

Start: ftp get / put command issued on the UE.

Stop: first data byte sent / received by the UE, or ftp indicates network error (e.g. timeout expired).

Related E2E KPIs (FTP) Completion Session Ratio.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 13 (52)

Page 14: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.2 (FTP) Completed Session Ratio

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 14 (52)

Page 15: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

(FTP) Completed Session Ratio [%]

Definition The Completion Session Ratio is the proportion of completed FTP sessions and sessions that were started successfully. The session is not completed if a predefined timer expires, or a network failure occurred that could not be repaired by automatic restarts.

Measurement methodology 1. Set the FMT to generate calls to the FTP Server automatically with the following script/sequence:

a. Connection attempt (network attach)b. Log into the FTP Serverc. FTP Download 800MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)d. Wait 3 sec. after session finishese. FTP Upload 300MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)f. Log out the FTP Server If UE gets into UE deregistered status

between calls, this test also valid to check the Attach Success Rate

g. Connection release (network detach)h. Leave 5 seconds before start next sessioni. Repeat all previous steps (from ‘a’)

2. Continue drive testing till the drive route is completed. 3. Stop the FMT at the end of the route.4. If the route does not generate more than 100 calls repeat the

measurement on the same measurement route.5. The FMT shall record the CRS RSRP, RSRQ and CRS SINR during

the measurement.6. Verify the Completion Session Ratio as per formula below

Assumptions, pre-conditions The FTP transfer shall be executed in binary mode.

FTP Application DL Throughput as measured by the DOS ftp application.

If above measurement methodology is followed the UE needs to attach to the network between FTP UL/DL sessions if the Attach Success Rate wants to be measured.

Formula (logical)FtpSessionSR=

numberof (completed sessions)numberof (successfully started sessions )

∗100 %

Message flow, trigger points Trigger points:

Start: ftp get / put command issued on the UE Stop: after error free execution of the command, ftp returns with a

prompt and indicates the number of bytes transmitted.

Related E2E KPIs (FTP) Service Accessibility Ratio.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 15 (52)

Page 16: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.3 (FTP) Single User Throughput

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 16 (52)

Page 17: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

(FTP) Single User Throughput [Mbps]

Definition After the connection to the FTP server has been successfully established, the parameter describes the average data transfer rate measured over the data transfer phase. I.e. prerequisite to the data transfer is successful Service Access (availability of an EPS bearer and connection to the FTP service). The data transfer phase shall also be successfully terminated.

The throughput is measured on application level in UL/DL direction.

Measurement methodology 1. Set the FMT to generate calls to the FTP Server automatically with the following script/sequence:

a. Connection attempt (network attach)b. Log into the FTP Serverc. FTP Download 800MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)d. Wait 3 sec. after session finishese. FTP Upload 300MB file (or other size with transfer duration

>1min)f. Log out the FTP Server If UE gets into UE deregistered status

between calls, this test also valid to check the Attach Success Rate

g. Connection release (network detach)h. Leave 5 seconds before start next sessioni. Repeat all previous steps (from ‘a’)

2. Continue drive testing till the drive route is completed. 3. Stop the FMT at the end of the route.4. If the route does not generate more than 100 calls repeat the

measurement on the same measurement route).5. The FMT shall record the CRS RSRP, RSRQ and CRS SINR during

the measurement.6. Verify the average DL/UL throughput of each session and determine

the final average throughput of all sessions.7. The measured mean throughputs can be displayed in diagrams as

function of time to show the impact of FTP slow start.

Assumptions, pre-conditions The initial status of UE before starting the application: EMM-REGISTERED, ECM-CONNECTED. If above measurement methodology is followed the UE needs to attach to the network between FTP UL/DL sessions if the Attach Success Rate wants to be measured.

The FTP application shall be executed in binary mode, and the file to be transferred shall be binary.

Formula (logical)FtpMeanTp=

transferred¿ [bytes ]∗8transfer time [s ]

∗10−6

Message flow, trigger points The average throughput is measured from opening the data connection to the end of the successful transfer of the content (file, e-mail or web page).

Trigger points for ftp upload / download are defined in [ETSI102.250-2]

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 17 (52)

Page 18: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.4 Attach Time

Attach Time (Control Plane) [ms]

Definition With Attach, the mobile terminal registers at the LTE network. At the end of the procedure the UE is authenticated, and a default (non-GBR) bearer is established.

The Attach Time is the interval between the RRC CONNECTION REQUEST (carrying the Attach Request) and the reception of a positive response by the UE (Attach Complete).

Measurement methodology 1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Check the UE DEGERISTERED between data calls Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed

and enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the Attach Time

Assumptions, pre-conditions UE status before measurement: EMM-DEREGISTERED

UE locked to LTE network.

Formula (logical) AttachTime [ms ]=tAttachComplete−tAttach Request

Message flow, trigger points Trigger points on UE R interface (see Figure 2, and refer to [3GPP23.401]):

Begin: 1. RRC CONNECTION REQUEST sent by UE carrying L3 NAS: Attach Request in its body.

End: 21. RRC DIRECT TRANSFER message with L3 NAS: Attach Complete in its body sent by UE (refer to [3GPP24.008]).

Related E2E KPIs a) Attach Success Rate.b) No 3GPP defined KPI for Attach Time found exists, or

measurements defined in R8 documents.

Detailed attach procedure with initial EPS bearer establishment is shown below.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 18 (52)

Page 19: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3. Identification Request

1. Attach Request

new MME Old MME/SGSN

Serving GW PCRF HSS

3. Identification Response

PDN GW

2. Attach Request

eNodeB UE

4. Identity Request

4. Identity Response 5a. Authentication / Security

17. Initial Context Setup Request / Attach Accept

First Uplink Data

19. RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete

18. RRC Connection Reconfiguration

20. Initial Context Setup Response

24. Update Bearer Response

23. Update Bearer Request

First Downlink Data

25. Notify Request

(B)

(A)

16. Create Default Bearer Response

12. Create Default Bearer Request

8. Update Location Request

9. Cancel Location

11. Update Location Ack

9. Cancel Location Ack

10. Delete Bearer Request

10. Delete Bearer Response

13. Create Default Bearer Request

15. Create Default Bearer Response

7. Delete Bearer Response

7. Delete Bearer Request

First Downlink Data (if not handover)

(C)

EIR

5b. ME Identity Check

5b. Identity Request/Response

10. PCEF Initiated IP-CAN Session Termination

7. PCEF Initiated IP-CAN Session Termination

14. PCEF Initiated IP-CAN Session Establishment

6. Ciphered Options Request

6. Ciphered Options Response

23a. Update Bearer Request

23b. Update Bearer Response

(D)

21. Direct Transfer 22. Attach Complete

BUE

EUE

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 19 (52)

Page 20: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Figure 2 Attach Procedure with Initial EPS Bearer Establishment (3GPP 23.401)

For initial Attach, the following specifics of the message flow in Figure 2 have to be considered: A signaling bearer (SRB1) is to be established, before an Attach Request can be sent, i.e. the UE is

expected execute a contention based Random Access (RA) procedure. Step 3. is not executed, since the IMSI is queried from the UE directly using Step 4. The optional

Identity Request / Response messages in step 5.b do not have to be exchanged if the MEI is already returned by the UE using the Security Mode Complete message as part of step 5.a.

Steps 7-11 are not executed, no EPS bearers are to be deleted.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 20 (52)

Page 21: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.5 Attach Success Rate

Attach Success Rate (Control Plane) [%]

Definition The Attach Success Rate is defined as the ratio between the number of successful registrations (RRC DIRECT TRANSFER: Attach Complete) and the number of all requests (RRC CONNECTION REQUEST: Attach Request). It is the probability that a user can attach to the LTE network at any moment of time.

The calculated success ratio figure excludes attach requests, which are rejected by authentication failures. On the other hand, network attach requests which are terminated by timer expiry (due to the unavailability of some LTE resource) are considered as unsuccessful registrations.

If the success rate is calculated on the eNB by counting incoming RRC requests, RRC CONNECTION REQUEST retries are to be excluded, since they would increase the overall number of establishment attempts, and thus reduce the success ratio.

Measurement methodology

For defining the success ratio, the same series of “Attach Time” measurements can be used:

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and enough

samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the Attach Success Rate as per formula below

The KPI cannot be measured as end-user perceived ratio on certain mobiles, which do not indicate network attachment status to the end-user.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

UE status before measurement: EMM-DEREGISTERED

UE locked to LTE network.

Formula (logical) AttachSR=

numberof (successful attachments)numberof (all attempts )

∗100 %

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger events on UE R interface (see Figure 2):

Success: 21. RRC DIRECT TRANSFER message with L3 NAS: Attach Complete in its body sent by the UE

Attempts: 1. RRC CONNECTION REQUEST messages (with cause Attach Request) sent by UE

Related E2E KPIs Attach Time, Service Request (EPS) Success Rate.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 21 (52)

Page 22: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.6 Service Request (EPS) Time, UE Initiated

Service Request Time (EPS Bearer Setup), UE Initiated, Control Plane [ms]

Definition Time taken by the LTE network to setup an EPS bearer on request by the UE. The EPS bearer can be new (dedicated) or an existing one (e.g. the default EPS bearer). The latter is needed to re-assign Uu radio and S1 bearer resources to the existing EPS bearer of a previously idle UE.

The EPS bearer has to be created before IP packets can be exchanged.

The UE Initiated EPS Bearer Setup Time is the interval between the submission of the message RRC CONNECTION REQUEST: Service Request (refer to [3GPP36.331]) and the reception of the RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION response on the UE. The Bearer Setup procedure is based on the Service Request procedure according to [3GPP23.401] and [3GPP36.300].

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and

enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the EPS Bearer Setup Time Note below that UE pre-status is EMM-REGISTERED so this KPI excludes

the Attach time

Assumptions, pre-conditions

UE status before measurement: EMM-REGISTERED and idle initial state.

UE locked to LTE network.

Formula (logical) Service Request Time [ms ]=t RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete−tRRCConnectionRequest

Message flow, trigger points

The message flow diagram is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. The user initiated EPS bearer setup time is measured between the trigger points BUE and EUE on the UE R interface:

Begin: RRC CONNECTION REQUEST(NAS: Service Request) sent by UE End: corresponding RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION

COMPLETE message or first PDU in UL sent by the UE (refer to [3GPP24.008]).

Related E2E KPIs a) Attach Time.b) No 3GPP defined KPI for EPS bearer setup found (exists).

Detailed EPS bearer setup procedure is shown below:

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 22 (52)

Page 23: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

D

LTE-Uu S1- MME S11 S6a

UE eNodeB MME S-GW / P-GW HSS

S1-AP: UL NAS TRANSPORT

(L3: AUTHENTICATION AND CIPHERING

REQUEST)

Begin measurementRRC CONNECTION

REQUEST

MAP: Send Authentication Info

Setup SRB1

RRC CONNECTION

SETUP

S1-AP: INITIAL UE MESSAGE

(L3 NAS: SERVICE REQUEST)

MAP: Send Authentication Info Ack

RRC: DL INFORMATION TRANSFER

(L3: AUTHENTICATION AND CIPHERING

REQUEST)

If authentication vectors are not available in MME, authenticate UE

RRC: UL INFORMATION TRANSFER

(L3: AUTHENTICATION AND CIPHERING

RESPONSE)

S1-AP: DL NAS TRANSPORT

(L3: AUTHENTICATION AND CIPHERING

RESPONSE)

If authentication timer has expired, setup security association for user plane RB

UE EMM-REGISTERED and ECM-IDLE

RRC CONNECTION SETUP COMPLETE

(L3 NAS: SERVICE REQUEST)

L2 SCTP: Create Bearer Request

L2 SCTP: Create Bearer Response

Activate EPS bearer setup in

ePC

DL data

L2 SCTP: DL DATA NOTIFICATION

BN

BUE

Paging Procedure

Figure 3 EPS Bearer Setup Procedure, Part I

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 23 (52)

Page 24: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

UE eNodeB MME S-GW / P-GW HSS

LTE-Uu S1- MME S11 S6a

S1-AP: INITIAL CONTEXT

SETUP REQUEST

PM Counter: EPS_SETUP_ATT

RRC SECURITY MODE COMMAND

RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION

COMPLETE

S1-AP: INITIAL CONTEXT

SETUP COMPLETE

L2 SCTP: Update Bearer Request

L2 SCTP: Update Bearer Response

First UL PDU

T1

T2

RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION

RRC SECURITY MODE COMMAND COMPLETE

Setup user plane RB

Means „Delay DL Packet Notification Request“ to stop/enable DL data transferPM Counter:

EPS_SETUP_SUCC

End measurement

First DL PDU

EUE

EN

S1-AP: INITIAL CONTEXT

SETUP FAILURE

Figure 4 EPS Bearer Setup Procedure, Part II

The service request times for UE initiated and for network initiated EPS bearer setups are measured between the trigger points BUE and EUE, and between BN and EN, respectively. These trigger points are colored green in the diagram.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 24 (52)

Page 25: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.7 Service Request (EPS) Success Rate

Service Request (EPS) Success Rate, Control Plane [%]

Definition Ratio between successfully established EPS bearers compared to the overall number of EPS bearer establishment attempts. It corresponds to the probability that a user or the LTE network can establish an EPS bearer at any moment in time.

Requests which are terminated by timer expiry (due to the unavailability of some LTE resource) are considered as unsuccessful attempts. Authentication errors (requests rejected by the MME) are included in the total number of failures.

Only the first RRC CONNECTION REQUEST is to be considered, since counting retries of the same message would increase the overall number of bearer establishment attempts, and thus reduce the success ratio.

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and

enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the EPS Bearer Setup Success Rate

Note below that UE pre-status is EMM-REGISTERED so this KPI excludes the Attach time

Assumptions, pre-conditions

UE status before measurement: EMM-REGISTERED and idle initial state.

UE locked to LTE network.

Formula (logical)EPSSR=

numberof (RRCConnectionReconfigurationC omplete)numberof (RRCConnectionRequest )

∗100 %

Message flow, trigger points

The message flow diagram is shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. The trigger points for UE initiated EPS bearer setup success ratio on the R interface are:

Success : RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION COMPLETE message sent by the UE, see EUE on Figure 4.

Total : an attempt is the sending of RRC CONNECTION REQUEST with appropriate establishment cause by the UE, see BUE on Figure 3.

Related E2E KPIs Service Request (EPS) Time, UE Initiated.

For initial EPS bearers, refer to KPI “Attach Success Rate”.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 25 (52)

Page 26: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.8 Service (EPS Bearer) Drop Rate

Service (EPS Bearer) Drop Rate, Control Plane [%]

Definition

Ratio between abnormally released bearers, and the overall number of established EPS bearers. An abnormal release is defined as any EPS bearer termination, which was not triggered by the mobile user (from UE side). Thus, it reflects the probability that an established bearer gets aborted due to insufficient network resources.

Dropping the bearer gets visible to the end-user if an application service is actively using it. If the application automatically re-establishes the bearer, it remains unnoticed by the user.

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and

enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the EPS Bearer Drop Rate

Note below that UE pre-status is EMM-REGISTERED so this KPI excludes the Attach time.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

UE status before measurement: EMM-REGISTERED and idle initial state.

UE locked to LTE network.

Formula (logical) EPSBearerDR=numberof (dropped calls)numberof (successful calls )

∗100 %

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger points on UE R interface:

Success : submission of the message RRC CONNECTION RECONFIGURATION COMPLETE by the UE, refer to [3GPP36.331]

Drop : successful establishments minus terminations by the user, i.e. the UE submitting a L3 DETACH REQUEST (refer to [3GPP24.008]) carried within the RRC message UL NAS TRANSPORT (refer to [3GPP36.331]).

For the calculation of a network initiated EPS bearer drop rate, EPC initiated L3 DETACH REQUEST-s are to be considered.

Related E2E KPIs Service Request (EPS) Success Rate.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 26 (52)

Page 27: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.9 Handover Procedure Time

Handover Procedure Time, Control Plane [ms]

Definition It denotes the total time needed for the handover procedure as seen by the UE. It begins by receiving a Handover Command from the source eNB and ends by sending the Handover Confirm response to the target eNB by the UE. The value of the KPI also depends of the handover scenario. The following HO scenarios are distinguished (though not directly seen by the UE):

intra- and inter-frequency HO inter eNB HO via X2/S1 interface

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and

enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify HO time for the different HOs

The handover time shall be measured on the UE R interface.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

Since Inter-RAT HO is not part of RL15 the only HO scenarios considered are intra LTE. Therefore, the LTE UE must be locked to LTE network.

UE status before measurement: registered and connected.

Formula (logical) Average value from all measured samples.

HOProcedureTime [ms ]=tHOConfirm−t HOCommand

Message flow, trigger points

The HO time is seen by the UE as the elapsed time between:

Start: UE receives Handover Command in the body of an RRC Connection Reconfiguration request from source eNB.

Stop: UE sends Handover Confirm response to target eNB in an RRC Connection Reconfiguration Complete message.

Related E2E KPIs a) (LTE) Service Interrupt Time (HO), Handover Success Rateb) No 3GPP defined KPI for HO procedure time found.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 27 (52)

Page 28: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.10 Handover Success Rate

Handover Success Rate, Control Plane [%]

Definition The Handover Success Rate is the ratio between successfully executed (committed) HO procedures and the number of all Handover attempts.

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and

enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary) Verify the Handover Success Rate

The measurement is to be executed for different HO scenarios.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

LTE terminal must be locked into the LTE network.

Formula (logical)HOSR=

numberof (HandoverConfirm)numberof (Handover Request )

∗100 %

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger points on eNB X2/S1 interfaces:

Total # : Handover Requests sent by Source eNB to Target eNB (HO via X2), or sent by MME to Target eNB(HO via S1).

Success # : UE Context Release message received by Source eNB from Target eNB(HO via X2), or UE Context Release Command received by Source eNB from MME(HO via S1).

In case of intra eNB HO procedures, no Handover Request is sent. Both trigger points are counted by the Source eNB internally.

Related E2E KPIs Handover Procedure Time

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 28 (52)

Page 29: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

3.1.11(LTE) Round Trip Time

Round Trip Time (RTT), User Plane [ms]

Definition RTT in UL is the interval between sending a datagram by the UE & receiving the corresponding reply from an IP peer entity connected to the Gi interface of the P-GW.

RTT in DL is the interval between sending a datagram to the UE & receiving the corresponding reply by the IP host (peer entity).

Measurement methodology

Stationary users in different cell positions, which are uniformly distributed across the cell.

RTT is measured with the Ping application between the UE and an IP host (peer entity). As average RTT figure, the output of the Ping application is used (e.g. “MS-DOS >ping -n count -l size host name”). Size of ICMP packets: 32, …, MTU bytes.

Ping shall be executed at least 100 times to reduce the impact of the first ICMP message, which triggers the setup of radio bearer establishments in UL and DL directions.

Record the average RTT shown on the screen after the application has run.

Repeat the test 5 times in each location under different SINR.

Note: Ping tests can also be carried out as part of a drive test sequence in which case, it is not possible to guarantee certain SINR levels

Assumptions, pre-conditions

UE status before measurement: registered and connected. An IP address is assigned to the UE.

The IP peer entity shall be located as close as possible to the SGi interface. Usually, 1 hop away the SAE-GW. Additional delays between the P-GW and the IP host shall be avoided or minimized.

Formula (logical) RTT [ms ]=t ICMPEcho Reply−t ICMP EchoRequest

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger points both from UE, and from IP peer entity view:

Start: ICMP ECHO REQUEST Stop: ICMP ECHO REPLY

Related E2E KPIs No 3GPP defined KPI for LTE RTT found.

3.1.12 (LTE) Single User Throughput

(LTE) Single User Throughput, User Plane [Mbps]

Definition The metric describes the data speed available to one user of the LTE

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 29 (52)

Page 30: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

network on UDP/IP level. It is given as the maximum (95%-ile) value that can be observed over a short period of time (e.g. of 1s) and as a mean value that characterizes longer data transfer periods (minutes). Its value distribution over the radio cell is given as a function of the SINR. The maximum value is often referred to in the literature as instantaneous "Peak Throughput" that is achieved in optimal radio conditions. The

user throughput can be given for a single user active in the cell (single user data rate), or to one of several concurrently active users.

Measurement methodology

Stationary and mobile user covering all kinds of cell positions: near, medium, far, including different HO scenarios. The data rate is measured in UL/DL direction with UDP/IP traffic over a time period of several minutes.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

The IP host used as traffic generator (e.g. with Iperf) should be connected directly to the SGi interface. Additional delays and bandwidth restrictions between the S/P-GW and the server need to be excluded.

Formula (logical)UserTp [Mbps ]=

transferred¿ [bytes]∗8transfertime [ s]

∗10−6

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger points on the UE R interface:

• UL: UE sending UDP/IP packets to the IP peer entity.

• DL: IP peer entity sending UDP/IP packets to the UE.

Related E2E KPIs Cell Throughput, (FTP) Single User Throughput, (RB) Single User Throughput.

The Single User Throughput KPI has been defined on E2E network level to verify if the capacity of large non-GBR EPS bearers (QoS profile with large maximum bit rates) can in fact be exploited by IP based services. The same holds for the E-RAB and RB bearers being part of the EPS. Especially, the maximum achievable throughput of the RB bearer is interesting, since it is the critical resource of the LTE network. For this reason, the Peak Throughput is defined as a separate KPI on the RB level (see KPI: (RB) Single User Throughput), too. Because of this relationship (containment) between EPS, E-RAB and RB, user throughput KPIs can be verified with the same series of measurements. The KPIs are interesting as values calculated over the full duration of long data transfers (~minutes). Of equal interest are peak values observed for a short time period only (~seconds). Please note that throughput KPIs have also been defined for application services, e.g. Single User Throughput KPI of the Data Download / Upload service, but these do not characterize the capability of the LTE network alone, but also depend on the application service and its protocols.

3.1.13 (LTE) Service Interrupt Time (HO)

(LTE) Service Interrupt Time (HO), User Plane [ms]

Definition Service interrupt is the discontinuity (increased packet inter-arrival time) of an

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 30 (52)

Page 31: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

IP packet flow caused by hand-over. It is the interval between the last sent/received user IP packet of a continuous UL/DL data stream in the old cell, and the first sent/received user IP packet in the new cell (user plane break).

The value of the KPI also depends of the handover scenario.

Measurement methodology

1 LTE UE/terminal with FMT

Set FMT to generate data calls to the data server automatically

Start drive test and continue driving until drive route is completed and enough samples are collected (re-drive route if necessary)

Verify the Service Interrupt Time

The measurement is to be executed for different HO scenarios: intra eNB, inter eNB via X2/S1 etc.

Only mobile user scenarios are considered. FTP upload/download data transfer, or real-time media flow during the handover.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

It is assumed that the X2 interface is enabled between the source and target eNBs (for inter eNB HO scenarios).

LTE terminal must be locked into the LTE network to measure the Service Interrupt Time.

Formula (logical) Service Interrupt Time [ms ]=tFirstPacket ¿ /¿TeNB¿−tLast Packet ¿/¿SeNB ¿

Message flow, trigger points

The trigger points for service interrupt time (from UE point of view):

Start: UE sends/receives last packet to/from source eNB

Stop: UE sends/receives first packet to/from target eNB.

Related E2E KPIs Handover procedure time.

3.1.14 (RB) Single User Throughput

(RB) Single User Throughput, User Plane [Mbps]

Definition The metric describes the RB throughput achievable by one user. It can be given as single user throughput if only one user is active in the cell, or as multi-user throughput for a given number of concurrently active users. The user throughput distribution over the cell is given as function (CDF) of the radio conditions characterized by the SINR.

The time variation of the KPI value in a given cell position is given with its maximum (95%-ile) (also referred to as instantaneous “Peak User Throughput”), and with its average (mean) value.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 31 (52)

Page 32: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Measurement methodology

Stationary and mobile user covering all kinds of cell positions: near, medium, far, including different HO scenarios.

The eNB assigns all resources (resource blocks) to this user, except the resource blocks used for signaling and controlling. With the help of trace analysis, PDCP, RLC, MAC and PHY layer throughputs can be defined.

With and w/o concurrency in UL / DL traffic.

The mean user data rate is calculated over a few minutes, peak data rate values are averaged over short periods of time (e.g. 1s).

Assumptions, pre-conditions

All transport bearers between the UE and IP peer entity should have higher capacity than the radio link in order to avoid bandwidth bottlenecks.

Formula (logical)RBUserTp [Mbps ]=

transferred¿[bytes]∗8transfer time [s ]

∗10−6

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger events on the eNB Uu interface or the UE R interface:

UL: eNB receiving PDUs, or UE sending PDUs DL: eNB sending PDUs, or UE receiving PDUs

Measured at the upper SAPs of the protocols PDCP, RLC, MAC or PHY.

Related E2E KPIs (LTE) Single User Throughput, Cell Throughput.

3.1.15 Cell Throughput

(RB) Single User Throughput, User Plane [Mbps]

Definition The metric shows the sustainable aggregate throughput of the cell (in UL/DL) available to “n” stationary users distributed uniformly in the cell and running a typical mix of applications. The “cell throughput” is the sum of all bits transported in all resource blocks carrying PDUs (i.e. bits in ULSCH/DL-SCH transport blocks) during one second.

The cell capacity is also given as peak value (called peak cell capacity, or throughput), which is defined as the aggregate throughput of “n” users all located in best radio conditions.

The cell throughput value is defined here on PHY level, but could be given for other protocol levels (UDP/IP, PDCP, RLC, MAC), too. When the (peak, average) cell throughput is expressed on UDP/IP level, it corresponds to the (peak, mean) user throughput value at comparable radio conditions.

Measurement methodology

Stationary users uniformly distributed in the cell. UE categories according to application mix. Peak value measured with one user in LoS cell position using UDP/IP load to approach the full buffer condition.

Measured with UDP/IP traffic on PHY layer (UL-SCH/DL-SCH transport block

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 32 (52)

Page 33: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

bits) over several minutes. With the help of trace analysis PDCP, RLC and MAC layer values can also be given.

Assumptions, pre-conditions

All IP transport bearers (S1, S5/S8, SGi) between the UE and IP peer entity should have higher bandwidth than the cell capacity to avoid bandwidth bottlenecks.

Formula (logical)CellTp [Mbps ]=

transferred¿ [bytes ]∗8transfer time [s ]

∗10−6

Message flow, trigger points

Trigger events on the eNB Uu interface or the UE R interface:

UL: eNB receiving PDUs, or UE sending PDUs DL: eNB sending PDUs, or UE receiving PDUs

Related E2E KPIs (RB) Single User Throughput.

3.2 Test Conditions and Target Values

Field KPI Target Values CommentsThroughput

Single User UL Peak

Throughput

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7): 15.4M

In case UL/DL conf=3:1(#2) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7): 7.5M

CMCC Hangzhou TD-LTE trial:*Cat 3 UE is considered and MCS20 is the max MCS in UL for RL15.*PUCCH overhead is 4RB and PDCCH overhead is 3 OFDM symbols.*L3 TCP throughput is considered.*Network is unloaded.*System bandwidth is 20M.

Single User DL Peak

Throughput

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):TM3: 59.6MTM7: 34M

In case UL/DL conf=3:1(#2) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):TM3: 80.7MTM7: 40.3M

Cell UL Average

Throughput

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 14.5M50% load: 13.3M70% load: 15.6M

In case UL/DL conf=3:1(#2) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 7.6M50% load: 6.5M

CMCC Hangzhou TD-LTE trial:*Cat 3 UE is considered and MCS20 is the max MCS in UL for RL15.*PUCCH overhead is 4RB and PDCCH overhead is 3 OFDM symbols.*L3 TCP throughput is considered.*System bandwidth is 20M.*20 UEs distributed by 2:4:8:6.*DL MIMO is TM3/TM7 adaptive and UL is SIMO.*eNB SW version is different for each neighbor load: RL15_2_CD1.0 for 0% load, RL15_2_CD2.0 for 50% load and RL15_2_CD3.0 for 70% load.

Cell DL Average

Throughput

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 35.6M50% load: 21.77M70% load: 24.82M

In case UL/DL conf=3:1(#2) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 40M

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 33 (52)

Page 34: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

50% load: 25.1M

Latency(Control Plane)

Attach LatencyIn case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 168ms

Voentelecom Russia TD-LTE Trial:*Radio condition is classified as:Good: CRS SINR >25Average: 10<CRS SINR<25Poor: 0<CRS SINR<10

Idle to Active Latency

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):50% load: 106ms

CMCC Hangzhou TD-LTE trial:*Radio condition is classified as:Very Good: CRS SINR > 22dBGood: 15dB< CRS SINR < 20dBMedium: 5dB < CRS SINR < 10dBPoor: -5dB < CRS SINR < 0dB*Pre-scheduling is off for 'Ping Latency' test,

Latency(User Plane)

Ping Latency

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load and single UE: for 32 bytes payload: 26msfor 1500 bytes payload: 30ms

50% load and single UE:for 32 bytes payload: 27msfor 1500 bytes payload: 31ms

50% load and 3 UEs:for 32 bytes payload: 28msfor 1500 bytes payload: 38ms

Mobility

Handover Latency

(Control Plane, intra-eNB or inter-eNB via

X2)

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 32ms

 CMCC Hangzhou TD-LTE trial:*Drive route includes both intra-eNB handover and inter-eNB handover (via X2)..*C-plane latency is counted as MAC layer latency, and U-plane latency is counted as PDCP layer latency, which is not strictly complied with CMCC's test specification.

 

Handover Latency

(User Plane, intra-eNB or inter-eNB via

X2)

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 61ms

Accessibility

Attach Success Rate

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 100%50% load: 99.17%

CMCC Hangzhou TD-LTE trial:*2.6G frequency band with 20M system bandwidth.*Drive test, speed is about 30Km/h.*Attach SR is defined as: #(Attach complete) / #(UE Power on).*RRC Connection Establishment SR is defined as: #(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete) / #(Data service request)*Handover SR is defined as:#(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete containing Handover Confirm to Target eNB) / #(Handover Request)*DR is defined as:#(RRCConnectionRelease and/or without application-layer throughput for more than 10s) / #(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete)

RRC Connection

Establishment Success Rate

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 99%50% load: 97.84%

Handover Success Rate

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 100%50% load: 98.37%

Reliability Drop Rate

In case UL/DL conf=2:2(#1) and special subframe conf=10:2:2(#7):0% load: 2%50% load: 3.42%

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 34 (52)

Page 35: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

4 Network KPIs

4.1 Network KPI Definitions

The defined network KPI lists do not present by any means a complete set of KPIs to be used in a customer case. It is the project team/CBT responsibility to define and agree with the customer the final list of KPIs to be used in each and every case.

The most interested network KPIs are listed below. Formula is indicated with the counter ID (e.g. M8007C1) which is unique for each counter instead of the counter name. More information about these KPIs and other network KPIs can be found in RISE database (refer to RL20 instead).

Table 2 List of Network KPIs

KPI Name Formula

Data Radio Bearer Setup Success Ratio

LTE_5003a100*sum(M8007C1) / sum(M8007C0)

Radio Bearer Drop Ratio

LTE_5004a

100*sum(M8007C5+M8007C6) / sum(M8007C3+M8007C4+M8007C5+M8007C13+M8007C6)

RRC Connection Establishment Success Rate

LTE_5218a

100*sum(M8013C5) / sum(M8013C17+M8013C18+M8013C19+M8013C20)

E-RAB Setup Success Ratio

LTE_5017a100*sum(M8006C1) / sum(M8006C0)

E-RAB Drop Ratio

LTE_5025a

100*sum(M8006C12+M8006C14+M8006C13) /sum(M8006C6+M8006C7+M8006C8+M8006C9)

HO Success Ratio (intra eNB)

LTE_5035a100*sum(M8009C7) / sum(M8009C6)

HO Success Ratio (inter eNB)

LTE_5048a100*sum(M8014C7) / sum (M8014C6)

Cell Availability Ratio

LTE_5750a100*sum(M8020C3) /sum(M8020C6)

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 35 (52)

Page 36: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

4.2 Test Conditions and Target Values

TBD

5 Appendix I: Trial Network KPIs

5.1 CMCC Large Scale Trial

5.1.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration

Test environment of CMCC large scale trial in Hangzhou is illustrated as below. There are 24 eNBs and 50 cells in total. Selected route for DT is also shown.

Figure 5 Test Environment of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou

Baseline configuration is shown as below.

Table 3 Baseline Configuration of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou

Parameter Baseline Configuration

Morphology Typical Urban

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 36 (52)

Page 37: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Carrier Frequency 2.6G

System Bandwidth 20M

Frame Structure

Normal CPUL/DL Configuration #1 (2:2) Special Subframe Configuration #7 (10:2:2)

CFI 3

Transmission ModeDL: TM3/TM7 AdaptiveUL: SIMO

Power ControlEnable PUCCH, PUSCH, and Sounding RS Power Control

HARQ Enable

AMC EnableeNB Transmission Power 8×5W

Random Access Contention-based

UE location is selected based on CRS SINR according to the following rules:

*Very Good: >22dB

*Good: 15dB~20dB

*Medium: 5dB~10dB

*Poor: -5dB~0dB

5.1.2 Field Results

Note that interference/load is generated by real UEs distributed evenly in medium point and poor point, performing UL/DL FTP traffic at the same time, which results in 50%/70%/100% load in DL and 5dB/8dB/11dB IoT in UL respectively.

Table 4 Field Results of CMCC Large Scale Trial in Hangzhou

KPI Name Test Condition Field Results Comments

Attach SR Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load.

Without load: 100%50% load: 99.17%

Defined as:Count(Attach complete)/Count(UE Power on)

RRC Connection Establishment SR

Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load. preambleTransMax=3.

Without load: 99%50% load: 97.84%

Defined as:Count(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete)/Count(data service request)

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 37 (52)

Page 38: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Paging SR Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load. preambleTransMax=3.

Without load: 98%50% load: 95.11%

Defined as:Count(Initial UE Message, NAS: Service Request)/Count(Paging)

DR Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load.

Without load: 2%50% load: 3.42%

Defined as:Count(RRCConnectionRelease and/or without application-layer throughput for more than 10s)/Count(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete)

Handover SR Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load.

Without load: 100%50% load: 98.37%

Defined as:Count(RRCConnectionReconfigurationComplete containing Handover Confirm to Target eNB)/Count(Handover Request)

Long-term Retainability and Average Throughput

Drive test(~30km/h), without load or under 50% load.

Without load: 23.3M in DL and 10.5M in UL50% load: 4.6M in DL and 5.9M in UL

Single User Peak TP

Stationary test and without load.

DL TM is TM3 or TM7, and UL is SIMO

When UL/DL conf=2:2 and S subframe conf=10:2:2:

UL: 15.27M (16.10M)

DL TM3: 57.70M(59.57M)

DL TM7: 32.87M(34.02M)

When UL/DL conf=3:1 and S subframe conf=10:2:2:

UL: 7.44M (7.98M)

DL TM3: 76.89M(79.98M)

DL TM7: 39.99M(45.18M)

Cat3 UE and physical layer TP is used.

Figures in the bracket are theoretical peak TP.

MCS20 is the maximum available MCS in UL for RL15.

Cell TP Stationary test, without load or under 50%/70% load.

20 UEs are distributed evenly: 2:4:8:6.

TM3/TM7 adaptive is used in DL and SIMO for UL.

When UL/DL conf=2:2 and S subframe conf=10:2:2,

*without load (RL15_2_CD1.0)

UL only:14.53M

DL only: 35.56M

UL&DL: 12.34M/27.51M

*50% load (RL15_2_CD2.0)

UL only:13.27M

Cat3 UE and L3 TP is used.

MCS20 is the maximum available MCS in UL for RL15.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 38 (52)

Page 39: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

DL only: 21.77M

UL&DL: 13.81M/20.46M

*70% load (RL15_2_CD3.0)

UL only:15.62M

DL only: 24.82M

UL&DL: 13.51M/23.67M

When UL/DL conf=3:1 and S subframe conf=10:2:2:

*without load (RL15_2_CD1.0)

UL only:7.55M

DL only: 40.02M

UL&DL: 6.13M/26.71M

*50% load (RL15_2_CD2.0)

UL only:6.48M

DL only: 25.09M

UL&DL: 5.22M/22.82M

*Ping Latency, also RTT latency

Single user ping latency, without load

Payload Test ConditionMax

Latency

Min Latency

Avg Latency

32 Bytes

Very Good 30ms 14ms 26msGood 30ms 14ms 26ms

Medium 41ms 14ms 25msPoor 42ms 14ms 26ms

1500 Bytes

Very Good 44ms 18ms 31msGood 45ms 21ms 29ms

Medium 44ms 18ms 30msPoor 102ms 18ms 31ms

Single user ping latency, with 50% load

PayloadTest

ConditionMax

LatencyMin

LatencyAvg

Latency

32 Bytes

Very Good 40ms 24ms 27ms

Good 37ms 14ms 26msMedium 51ms 17ms 26ms

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 39 (52)

Page 40: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Poor 51ms 24ms 29ms

1500 Bytes

Very Good 41ms 26ms 31ms

Good 41ms 18ms 30msMedium 51ms 19ms 30ms

Poor 61ms 23ms 33ms

Multiple users ping latency, with 50% load

PayloadTest

Condition

Max Latency

Min Latency

Avg Latency

32 Bytes

Good 43 24 28

Medium 49 18 29

Poor 43 24 28

1500 Bytes

Good 57 26 37

Medium 69 24 38

Poor 66 31 39

*Control-plane Latency, also idle-to-active latency

Control-plane latency is defined as the duration between MSG1 of random access and the RRCConnectionConfigurationComplete sent by UE to eNB.

With 50% load:

Test Conditio

n

Min Latency

Max Latency

Avg Latency

Very Good

100 110 105

Good 100 110 107Medium 100 120 107

Poor 100 130 107

*Handover Latency

Handover latency of control-plane is defined as the duration between MeasurementReport sent by UE to source eNB and the RRCConnectionConfigurationComplete sent by UE to target eNB.

Handover latency of user-plane is defined as the duration between UE/source eNB receives the last packet from source eNB/UE and UE/target eNB receives the first packet from target eNB/UE in DL and UL respectively.

Without load:

 Min

LatencyMax

LatencyAvg

LatencyControl Plane

24 53 32

User Plane 45 155 61

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 40 (52)

Page 41: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

ULUser Plane

DL45 155 61

5.2 Bharti Airtel Trial

5.2.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration

There are 4 sites for Bharti Airtel TD-LTE Trial, which are shown as below.

Figure 6 Test Environment of Bharti Airtel TD-LTE Trial

Baseline configuration is listed as below.

Table 5 Baseline Configuration of Bharti Airtel TD-LTE Trial

Parameter Baseline Configuration

Frequency Band 2.3G

Carrier Bandwidth 10M/20M

Maximum Tx power DL 3 x 20 Watts

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 41 (52)

Bharti Co-located

Sital Lodge

Republic of Chicken

Ranbaxy

630 mtrs

640 mtrs

420 mtrs

840 mtrs

530 mtrs

Page 42: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

(Pout @ eNodeB)

Antenna System Dedicated Antenna System

DL MIMO Configurations 2x2 TM2/TM3

Test UEs Class 3

Test UE Mobility Stationary and drive test

5.2.2 Field Results

*Handover Latency: DL TCP with speed 30km/h, unloaded network.

Handover latency for Intra-eNB case is defined as:

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 42 (52)

Page 43: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Total latency for intra-eNB handover is 65.31ms.

Handover latency for inter-eNB via X2 is defined as:

Total latency for inter-eNB HO via X2 interface is 90.07ms.

*Service Request Time, also idle-to-active time

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 43 (52)

Page 44: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

UE location is selected based on following radio conditions:

-Near: CRS SINR >25dB

-Middle: 12dB<CRS SINR <15dB

-Far: 2dB<CRS SINR<5dB

Field results are:

Note that, herein definition of idle-to-active latency, which is the duration between ServiceRequest and RRCConnectionSetupComplete, is not correct.

*RTT, also ping latency

Field results(pre-scheduling is on) are:

*Single User Throughput

Field results are:

In above figure, “Config-1” means UL/DL configuration 1 with special subframe configuration 7, and “Config-2” means UL/DL configuration 2 with special subframe configuration 7.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 44 (52)

Page 45: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

5.3 Maxis Aircel Trial

5.3.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration

There are 3 sites for Maxis Aircel TD-LTE Trial, which are shown as below.

Figure 7 Test Environment of Maxis Aircel TD-LTE Trial

Baseline configuration is listed as below.

Table 6 Baseline Configuration of Maxis Aircel TD-LTE Trial

Parameter Baseline Configuration

Frequency Band 2.3G

Carrier Bandwidth 20M

Maximum Tx power DL (Pout @ eNodeB)

3 x 20 Watts

Frame Configuration UL/DL Configuration 2 (3:1)

Special Subframe Configuration 7 (10:2:2)

DL MIMO Configurations 2x2 TM2/TM3

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 45 (52)

Page 46: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Test UEs Class 3

Test UE Mobility Stationary and drive test

5.3.2 Field Results

*Peak Throughput

Single user peak throughput with frame configuration 2-7(3:1 and 10:2:2) is: max=80.6M, avg=71.6M.

*Ping Latency (pre-scheduling is on)

Payload=32Bytes, min=12ms, avg=14ms, and max=17ms.

*Cell Throughput

10 UEs all located in good/medium/poor location, and neighbour load is 0% or 70%. Test results are:

*Handover Latency

In case of intra-eNB handover, test results are:

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 46 (52)

Page 47: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

In case of inter-eNB handover via X2 interface, test results are:

In case of inter-eNB handover via S1 interface, test results are:

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 47 (52)

Page 48: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

5.4 Voentelecom Russia

5.4.1 Test Environment and Baseline Configuration

There are 3 sites for Voentelecom TD-LTE trial, and the baseline configuration is as below.

Table 7 Baseline Configuration of Voentelecom TD-LTE Trial

Parameter Baseline Configuration

Frequency Band 2.3G

Carrier Bandwidth 20M

Maximum Tx power DL

(Pout @ eNodeB)

3 x 20 Watts

Frame Configuration UL/DL configuration 1 (2:2) and 2 (3:1)

DL MIMO Configurations 2 x 2 TM4

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 48 (52)

Page 49: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

Test UEs Class 3

Test UE Mobility Stationary and drive test

5.4.2 Field Results

*Single user throughput

UDP throughput with UL/DL configuration 1: 55.8M in DL and 15.2M in UL.

UDP throughput with UL/DL configuration 2: 80.2M in DL and 7.4M in UL.

TCP throughput with UL/DL configuration 2: 69.3M in DL

*Peak cell throughput

UDP throughput with UL/DL configuration 2: 111M (55.8M+55.2M) in DL and 19.3M (10.8M+8.5M) in UL

*Attach Latency

UE location is selected based on following radio conditions:

-Good: CRS SINR >25

-Average: 10<CRS SINR<25

-Poor: 0<CRS SINR<10

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 49 (52)

Page 50: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

*Handover Latency:

Note that inter-eNB HO is based on X2 interface.

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 50 (52)

Page 51: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

*RTT Latency, also ping latency:

5.5 Appendix II: Early Network KPIs

5.5.1 STC Saudi

TBD

5.5.2 Sky Brazil

TBD

6 References

[1] <e-UTRAN Field and Network KPI list for RL10>, Lorena Serna

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D411459148

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 51 (52)

Page 52: TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD_V1.1

TD-LTE KPI Optimization Guidelines for RL15TD Version: 1.1

[2] <E2E Field Network Performance - LTE, KPI Definitions>, Andras Balazs

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D428312882

[3] <E2E Field Network Performance - KPI Targets for RL15TD>, Andras Balazs

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D428312884

[4] <Cluster Acceptance Guidelines for TD-LTE >, Ric Kong

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D435855209

[5] <TDD-LTE Optimization Guidelines>, Lorena Serna

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/439397953

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D415266561

[6] <FDD-LTE Optimization Guidelines>, Lorena Serna

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/Open/D415266561

[7] NWS-TDD-LTE Wiki

https://twiki.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/bin/view/LTETechSup/TdLteHome

[87] RL15 Trials and Pilots

https://sharenet-ims.inside.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/livelink/livelink?func=ll&objId=421758333&objAction=Browse

[89]

Copyright © Nokia Siemens Networks 2011Company Confidential Page 52 (52)


Recommended