Date post: | 03-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | simon-nelson |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
TEACH LEVEL II: CLINICAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES STREAM
Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology
Director, Center for Evidence-based Practice
Medical Director, Clinical Decision Support
Senior Associate Director, ECRI-Penn AHRQ EPC
TEACH Plenary
August 8th, 2013
2
Goal
To gain knowledge, attitudes and skills required to develop and adapt clinical policies and guidelines for implementation in health care.
3
Faculty
Karen Schoelles, MD, MS• Director, ECRI-Penn AHRQ EPC
Louise Falzon, MS• Research Librarian, Columbia University, and BCBS AHRQ EPC
Ian Graham, PhD• Vice-President, Knowledge Translation, Canadian Institutes of Health
Research; and Associate Professor, University of Ottawa
4
Daily Schedule
5
An Illustrative Case: Surgical Site Infections
6
Defining the problem and building a team
Building a team to define and address the problem• Multidisciplinary• Executive sponsorship• Consumers• COI
Using evidence as part of the process• Local• Published
Frame or “fit” problem within priorities of leadership to motivate support and solutions
Mitchell MD, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26(3):294-300.
Harris C, Turner T and Wilkinson F. Guideline Development Toolkit. 2008.
Lavis JN, et al. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2009, 7(Suppl 1):S4 doi:10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S4.
7
PICO and Analytic Frameworks
Samson D, Schoelles KM. J Gen Intern Med . 2012; 27(Suppl 1):S11–19.
8
Daily Schedule
9
Pyramid: 3 dimensional “3-S” model linking study designs to electronic resources
Silva SA, Wyer PC. The Roadmap: a blueprint for evidence literacy within a Scientifically Informed Medical Practice and Learning (SIMPLE) model. The International Journal of Person Centered Medicine. 2012. (In press)
10
National Guideline Clearinghouse
11
PubMed: Guidelines and Reviews
12
Cochrane Library: Reviews and HTAD
13
Daily Schedule
14
Trustworthy Guidelines
15
IOM
IOM domains
1. Establishing transparency
2. Management of conflict of interest
3. Guideline development group composition
4. Clinical practice guideline - systematic review intersection
5. Establishing evidence foundations for and rating strength of recommendations
6. Articulation of recommendations
7. External review
8. Updating
16
AGREE II Instrument
Tool to assess the quality of clinical practice guidelines.
Composed of 23 items in 6 domains:• Scope and purpose (3 items)• Stakeholder involvement (3 items)• Rigor of development (8 items)• Clarity of presentation (3 items)• Applicability (4 items)• Editorial independence (2 items)
Two Overall Assessments:• Rating of the overall quality of the guideline• Whether the user recommends the guideline for use in practice
AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. Brouwers et al., Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 (2010) 1308e1311
17
Daily Schedule
18
Hospital-based Health Tech Assessment
J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(12):1352–5
19
Daily Schedule
20
Seven Key Steps for Systematic Reviews
1. Define the question2. Establish eligibility criteria3. Search literature4. Extract data5. Evaluate individual study quality6. Synthesize data qualitatively and/or
quantitatively (MA)7. Explore heterogeneity
21
Daily Schedule
22
23
Daily Schedule
24
CAN-IMPLEMENT©: a six step model
Tool 4.1o Recommendations Matrix (template)
26
Stream Objectives
By the end of this workshop, participants in this stream will be able to:
Knowledge
1.Describe how to define a health care problem and identify questions requiring guideline recommendations2.Describe how to find, appraise, and adapt guidelines and systematic reviews for local use3.Describe the principles involved in doing original systematic reviews of the evidence4.Describe how to formulate actionable recommendations
27
Stream Objectives (continued)
Attitudes
1.Recognize the importance of carefully defining questions prior to searching for answers2.Recognize the importance of the contribution of multidisciplinary teams to getting the questions right3.Recognize the importance of appraising the quality of guidelines when selecting a guideline to adapt4.Recognize the importance of adapting guidelines to local context
28
Stream Objectives (continued)
Skills
1.Frame questions using an analytic frameworks such as the PICO format2.Develop efficient search strategies corresponding to the analytic framework3.Use tools such as AGREE II to appraise guideline quality4.Use tools such as AMSTAR to appraise the quality of systematic reviews5.Use GRADE or similar principles to synthesize an evidence base and develop actionable recommendations6.Use ADAPTE and Can Implement to adapt national guidelines for local use
29
Questions?