+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Teaching for Equality

Teaching for Equality

Date post: 09-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: eljace
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 12

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    1/12

    Teaching for Equality

    and Social Justice

    Does the through-road concept bring equality and

    social justice to HKs education system?

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    2/12

    Farrells 4 Types of (In)equality

    Equality of access- different social groups getting in

    Equality of survival

    - different social groups staying in Equality of output

    - different social groups learn the same thingsat the same points

    Equality of outcome- different social groups live relatively similarlines (jobs, incomes, status, etc)

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    3/12

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    4/12

    . . . Still in the past . . .

    1995

    university entrants: 7% to 18%

    Elite school graduates got in mostly

    Exam orientation drove the edu system Both students and parents felt the

    pressure in what many perceived as

    unequal education

    How different will it be with HKDSE?

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    5/12

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    6/12

    Nowadays: Edu Reforms

    Through-road model = students enjoy

    studying without having to jump hoops

    like public exams

    Less pressure for students when studying

    Higher chance to reach their potentialand develop in schools

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    7/12

    People believed that an individualsintelligence was responsible for ones

    own success/failure

    But Bourdieu argues:

    due to uneven distribution of cultural

    capital ie education institution

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    8/12

    Govt aim:

    break inequality circle (smarter studentsfrom elite schools gets into higher school

    places while the lower achievers lose out)j

    Originally lower achieving students now

    have a chance b/c they may do better

    with the NSS (less pressure from HKAL)

    Is this fair? (fair to who?)

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    9/12

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    10/12

    Criticism:

    Academic standard drops (melting pot of

    smart and less-smart students)

    Overall learning and teaching standard

    decreases to cater to overall lower

    abilities in classes

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    11/12

    so what did some schools try to do?

    Privatize / become DSS to maintain higher

    academic standard

    = families who can pay the higher school fees

    could send their children to study there

    cost as a barrier

    inequality on class rather than on ability

  • 8/8/2019 Teaching for Equality

    12/12

    Walk in their shoes

    1. Students from lower income families2. Students from high-middle income families

    3. Parents from lower income families

    4. Parents from high-middle income families

    5. Principals from traditional elite schools

    6. Teachers

    (what they think / how they feel about

    these changes and effects)

    Also consider Farrells 4 types of equality


Recommended