+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David...

Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David...

Date post: 02-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: brooke-reynolds
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
17
Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer Morris Josh Snyder Sub-group 1 Sub-group 2 Sub-group 3
Transcript
Page 1: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Team CrushPhase II Completion

Ryan Gonzalez

Brent Rieman

Matt Yankow

Alec Byrum

Patrick David

Amanda Koch

John Ranalli

Mark Kintner

Kelly Murphy

Spencer Morris

Josh Snyder

Sub-group 1

Sub-group 2

Sub-group 3

Page 2: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Phase One: Overview

• Toolkit 1-Technical foundations, Infrastructure,

Experimental Research, Energy and Resources,

Communication.

• Toolkit 2- Processing, Research Consideration of

Materials, Materials Testing, Processing Functions.

• Toolkit 3- Design Process, Problem Solving and

Brain Storming, Material Considerations, Innovation,

Research.

Page 3: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Phase One: Application to Crush

• Toolkit 1: Develop Infrastructure, Utilize Resources

• Technology: Personal Responsibilities.

• Toolkit 2: Processing, Material Durability, Important

Processes.

• Toolkit 3: Concurrent Design, Problem Solving & Brainstorming, Research and innovation.

Page 4: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Tool 4 Overview

• Cost analysis – Direct & Indirect Costs, ROI, BEA

• Productivity Improvement – Examination, Teamwork

• Traditional Productivity Tools – Time, Methods, Sampling

• Japanese Techniques – Synchronous Production, Reducing Production Time, J.I.T.

Page 5: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Tool 4: Application to Crush

• Costs – Staying under budget when purchasing materials

and paying labor

• Productivity – Teamwork, Product Improvements, And reducing the time of production using Japanese techniques

• Tools – Timing of product implementation, Testing to enhance productivity

Page 6: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Tool 5 Overview

• Quality Systems – Quality Function Deployment, ISO 9000

• Metrology & Inspection – Quality Characteristics, Specific Inspection

• Data-Based Systems – Charts, Statistics

• Problem Solving – Steps for Correcting Problems

• Reliability & Quality - Materials, Standards

Page 7: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Tool 5: Application to Crush

• Quality Systems – Meeting set Quality Standards

• Inspection –Quality and Functionality of all prototypes and products

• Flow Charts- Enhance Productivity, Reduce downtime

• Problem Solving – Identifying and Correcting Problems, Testing Solutions

• Quality – Materials selection, Manufacturing processes

Page 8: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Toolkit 6: Overview

• Robotics and Handling - useful for dangerous materials

and repetitive motions

• Programmable Controllers - control motion, flow,

pressure, etc. A machine follows a list of commands.

• Computer Aided Production - increases production time,

speed, accuracy while decreasing production time and cost.

• Group Technology - documentation of parts, inventory,

time, to assure maximum profitability

Page 9: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Toolkit 6 Summary

• Robotics and Handling - Increase accuracy on cuts, and when drilling holes

• Programmable Controllers - Ensures holes are not drilled too deeply, enables handling of delicate materials (PVC, thin dowels) without damage.

• Computer Aided Production - Allows holes to be drilled and materials cut to specific tolerances, without the error of locating each cut or hole.

• Group Technology - Has allowed our teams to communicate effectively, determine production numbers and perform cost analysis functions.

Page 10: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Prototype TwoEase of construction

Crushing ability

Product usefulness

Ease of use/maintenance

Original Prototypes

Prototype OneProduct usefulness

Structural integrity

Crushing ability

Ease of use/maintenance

Page 11: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Group 1: Product Slide

• Design elements: slanted sides, can be used standing by itself or put on a wall.

• Can Crushing: Prototype one uses the same basic crushing mechanism that both the other two use.

• Usability: PVC pipe is moveable so that the can can slide out after it has been crushed.

Designed by - Ryan Gonzalez, Brent Rieman, Matt Yankow

Page 12: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Part/ Unit

Materials Operation Or Function

Specifications Sub-UnitCost

TotalUnit Cost

Dir.Cost

Ind.Cost

Total Part Costs

Plywood Wood Serves as base, sides and backing of can crusher

Side: 2 - 5in x16in sectionsBase – 3.5in x 16 in

1.201.03

3.43 .30 .30 4.03

Smashing arm Wood To crush the can Total: 8’x2”x4”Sub units:11.75’’x2”x4”

.32 .32 .30 .50 1.12

Handle Black iron Designed to pushthe smashing arm down to crush thecan

Total: 6ft x 3/4inSub units:13.5in section

.90 .90 .20 .30 1.40

Metal Rod Steel Holds handle to base o

Total: 6ft x 1/8inSub unit5in section

.23 .23 .10 .30 .63

PVC tubing PVC piping

Holds can in place so can will be crushed.

Total: 10ft section 3in in diameterSub units: in section

.66 .66 .20 .60 1.46

Bolts and nuts and washers

Steel Hold various parts together

2 – ¼ in x 2in bolts1 – ¼ in x 4 in bolt4 – ¼ in nuts2 – ¼ in washers

.10

.20

.20

.05

1.30 .10 .30 1.70

ColumnTotals

4.89 6.84 1.20 2.30 10.34

Cost Analysis and Flowchart

Cut main backboard

1/2in plywood to length

Cut sides to same length

as back

Drill holes and attach

sides to back

Drill holes and attach sides to back

Drill holes and attach sides to back

Cut and shape Arm and attach to handle

Cut small pieces for

handle mounting

Glue pieces to backing and drill holes.

Cut slot in back and attach handle to backing.

Sub-Group 1

Page 13: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Group 2: Product Slide

Benefits of Design:

• Efficient Cost wise

• Free Standing or Wall-Mountable

•Cost effective design

•Compact

•Easy to build

Downfalls of Design:

•Not aesthetically appealing

•Low durability

•Low quality

•Hard to operate

Designed by – Alec Byrum, Patrick David, Amanda Koch, John Ranalli

Page 14: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Part/ Unit

Materials Operation Or Function

Specifications Sub-UnitCost

TotalUnit Cost

Dir.Cost

Ind.Cost

Total Part Costs

Base boards Wood Back and base of product that will be connected to the wall.

Back: 13” x 2” x 4”Bottom: 5” x 2” x 4”

.35

.13.48 .30 .30 1.08

Smashing arm Wood To crush the can 1 -11” x 4”x 2”(makes 2 smashing arms)

.30 .15 .40 .40 .95

Handle Dowel Rod Connected to the smashing arm, it decreases the force needed to beapplied from the user

1 – ¾” d. – 12” section . 50 .50 .10 .25 .85

L Brackets Steel Holds handle to base

2 – 2” .47 .94 .10 .30 1.34

PVC tubing PVC piping Location for can to be placed during crushing process.

1 – 6.25” section, 3” diam.

.52 .52 .40 .80 1.72

Connections Hex BoltsNutsWood Screw

Hold various parts together.

1– ¼ in x 1.5 in bolt1 – ¼ in x 2 in bolt2 – ¼ in nuts2 – 4 in screws4 – 1 in screws

1 * .251 * .302 * .052 * .154 * .09

1.31 .10 .30 1.71

ColumnTotals

3.11 3.90 1.40 2.35 7.65

Swivel Bracket Blocks, Plywood

Base, Crushing

Tube, Ram, Handle,

Crushing Pad

Cut to Length/Width

Needed

Drill Holes for Pivots on the

Handle

Notch out Space for Handle on

Ram

Inspect Final Product

Attach Swivel Bracket Blocks to

Base

Attach Brackets

Attach Crushing Tube

and Pad to Brackets

Attach Handle Brackets to

Base

Attach Handle

Attach Ram to Handle

Inspect

Production Flow Chart and Cost Analysis

Final Assembly

Sub-Group 2

Page 15: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Group 3: Product Slide

Benefits of Design:

• Uses Mechanics universal to Team 1

• Free Standing or Wall-Mountable

• Recessed Handle for easy operation and reduction of moving parts

• Cost effective design

•Enclosure sweeps open to drop can into wastebasket below.

•Crushing Beam easily slides into PVC pipe.

Designed by – Mark Kintner, Kelly Murphy, Spencer Morris, Josh Snyder

Page 16: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Part/ Unit

Materials Operation Or

Function

Specifications Sub-UnitCost

TotalUnit Cost

Dir.Cost

Ind.Cost

Total Part Costs

Frame Wood Aesthetics and structure

Three 1” x 6” planks, 19” long. Two for sides, one for backing

$.25 $.75 $.10 $.50 $1.35

Handle Wood Leverage ¾” Dowel Rod, 12” in length

$.43 $.43 $.10 $.50 $1.03

Can Holder

PVC Can enclosure

3” ID PVC pipe 7” in length

$.75 $.75 $.15 $.75 $1.65

Crushing Beam

Wood Crushes the can

2” x 4” plank of wood, notched to enclose handle. 10.5” in length

$.37 $.37 $.15 $.50 $1.02

Wood Platform

Wood Platform inside tubing.

2” x 4” plank of wood, 3” in length, rounded to fit inside PVC pipe.

$.16 $.16 $.15 $.50 $.81

Hardware Steel (Zinc)

Hold can crusher together

1 - ¼” x 3” Carriage Bolt2 – ¼” x 6” Carriage Bolt3 – ¼” x 20 thread Nuts

$.15$.30$.05

$.15$.60$.15

$.05$.05$.05

$.10$.10$.10

$.30$.75$.30

ColumnTotals

$2.46 $3.36 $.80 $3.05 $7.21

Cut pieces, sides, handle, crushing arm,

base, PVC pipe, crush

plate.

Drill holes in PVC,

handle, base, crush plate, sides.

Cut recess slot for

handle

Round edges on bottom of

handle and cut crushing arm at angle

Assemble handle and

crushing arm with bolts,

nuts, washers

Attach PVC to base with bolts, nuts,

washers

Attach handle and

throwing arm assembly to

the base

Attach sides to enclose

crusher

Production Flow Chart and Cost AnalysisSub-Group 3

Page 17: Team Crush Phase II Completion Ryan Gonzalez Brent Rieman Matt Yankow Alec Byrum Patrick David Amanda Koch John Ranalli Mark Kintner Kelly Murphy Spencer.

Conclusion: The Final Product

• Durable construction

• Most advanced, creative and

functional design

• Marketability

• More expensive per unit compared to

other two products, but the appearance

is worth the cost

• Total Cost: $ 10.34

The design of Sub-Group 1, Team Crush


Recommended