TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND...

TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency

2013

TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION

AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

Ministry of National Development Planning/National Development Planning Agency

2013

iiiTECHNICAL GUIDELINE

FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

Advisor Endah Murniningtyas Deputi Bidang Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan Hidup, Bappenas

Person in Charge Wahyuningsih Darajati Direktur Lingkungan Hidup, Bappenas

Editors Syamsidar Thamrin, Atjeng Kadaryana, Budhi Setiawan, Muchamad Muchtar

Authors Land-Based Sector GroupFahmuddin Agus, Sonya Dewi, Prihasto Setyanto, Iman Santosa, Miranti Ariani, Andree Ekadinata, Feri Johana, Anna Tosiani, Ai Dairiah, Maswar Basri, Ariwibowo, I. Wayan Susi Dharmawan, Febyana Suryaningrum, Yuliana C. Wulan, Putra Agung, Degi Harja, Anggri Hervani, Virni Budi Arifanti.

Energy-Based Sector GroupHarris, Gita Lestari, Fitria Firman, Kunaefi, Ezrom Tapparan, Erick Hutrindo, Agung Feinnudin, Imam Hambali, Karlo Manik, Gitafajar Saptyani, Saifuddin Suaib, Achmad Zacky Ambadar, M. Nanang Prayudyanto, Agustina Martha Kimberly, Trita Katriana, Devin Maeztri, Indira Darmoyono.

Waste SectorKati Andraini Darto, Dida Migfar, Gan Gan Dirgantara, Febrian Hadinata, R.M. Rangga Rajasa Akib, Badariah Yosiyana.

Technical Support TeamAries Kusumawanto, Mulkan A. Gani, Shinta Sirait, Zamsyar Giendhra Fad, Asclepias Rachmi, Soeharwinto, Damantoro, Altami Chrysan Arasty, Citara Nayla Iqbal, Dwiyanti Arimbi Jinca.

Administrative TeamLestira Wattimena, Harliana, Tanti Hariyanti, Septy Haryanny

TEAM OF AUTHORS

ivTECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We would like to extend our gratitude to all staff under the Deputy for Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of National Development Planning/ Bappenas for the support in the development of the Technical Guideline.

The development of the Technical Guideline for Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting (MER) of Local Action Plans for Green House Gas Emission Reduction (RAD-GRK) is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) through Policy Advice for Environment and Climate Change (Paklim). The support has been very highly appreciated.

The development process of the Technical Guideline has also been supported through well-fostered partnership of various institutions with high dedication from the following parties:

1. Ministry of Home Affairs2. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources3. Ministry of Forestry4. Ministry of Finance 5. Ministry of Environment6. Ministry of Transportation7. Ministry of Public Works8. Ministry of Industry9. Ministry of Agriculture10. GIZ Transport and Climate Change11. ICCTF12. ICED/USAID13. ICRAF (World Agro-forestry)14. JICA

Our deep gratitude is extended to all parties and participants of the workshop on the development of General Guideline and Technical Guideline for MER of RAD-GRK which provided a lot of inputs to the improvement of the Technical Guideline.

vTECHNICAL GUIDELINE


TEAM OF AUTHORS iiiACKNOWLEDGEMENT ivTABLE OF CONTENTS vLIST OF MER FORMS viLIST OF TABLES viiLIST OF PICTURES viiiGLOSSARY ix

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Goal 2 1.3 Scope 2 1.4 Definition 2

CAHPTER 2TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR LAND-BASED SECTOR GROUP 2.1 Agricultural Sector 8 2.2 Forestry and Peatland Sector 9

CHAPTER 3TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR ENERGY-BASED SECTOR GROUP 3.1 Energy Sector 59 3.2 Transportation Sector 72

CHAPTER 4 TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SECTOR 4.1 Domestic Solid Waste Sub-Sector 95 4.2 Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector 114

BIBLIOGRAPHY 129

TABLE OF CONTENTS

viTECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

LIST OF MER FORMS

FORM 2.1.1 Core Activity Form for Agriculture Sector 10FORM 2.1.2a Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector in Fertilizing System Category 13FORM 2.1.2b Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector of Rice Field Cultivation Category 19FORM 2.1.2c Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector of Animal

Husbandry Category 24FORM 2.1.3 Supporting Activity Form for Agriculture Sector 28FORM 2.2.1 Core Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector 37FORM 2.2.2a Calculation Form for Forestry and land Use Change in Mineral Land 41FORM 2.2.2b Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change in Peatland 47FORM 2.2.3 Supporting Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector 56FORM 3.1.1 Core Activity Form for Energy Sector 62FORM 3.1.2 Emission Calculation Form for Energy Sector 65FORM 3.1.3 Supporting Activity Form for Energy Sector 70FORM 3.2.1 Core Activity Form for Transportation Sector 76FORM 3.2.3 Supporting Activity Form for Transportation Sector 91FORM 4.1.1 Core Activity Form for Domestic Solid Waste Sub-Sector 97FORM 4.1.2 Supporting Activity Form for Domestic Solid Waste Sub-Sector 101FORM 4.1.3 District/City GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Solid Waste Sub-

Sector 104FORM 4.1.4 Provincial GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Solid Waste Sub-Sector 109FORM 4.1.5 National GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Solid Waste Sub-Sector 112FORM 4.2.1 Core Activity Form for Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector 115FORM 4.2.2 Supporting Activity Form for Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector 119FORM 4.2.3 District/City GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector 122FORM 4.2.4 Provincial GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector 124FORM 4.2.5 National GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Liquid Waste Sub-Sector

126

viiTECHNICAL GUIDELINE


LIST OF TABLES

TabLe 1 Example of activities in fertilizing activity group 17TabLe 2 Example of activities in rice field cultivation category 23TablE 3 Examples of activities in animal husbandry management activity group 27Table 4 Correction factor (cf ) for various water treatment in Indonesia 31Table 5 Default Ch4 emission SCALING factor for water regime before planting period 31Tabel 6 Default converstion factor for use of various types of organic materials 31Table 7 Correction factor (CF) of various varieties of field rice in Indonesia* 32Tabel 8 Correction factor (CF) for various varieties of tidal rice in Indonesia* 32Table 9 Default N2O emission factor from managed land 33Tabel 10 Default Emission Factor for N2O Indirectly from Volatilization and

Laundering 33TabLe 11 Emission Factor from Utilization of Amelioran in Peat Soil Converted into Rice Field 33Table 12 Peat soil Emission Factor with palm oil Land Use 34Table 13 CH4 emission factor from enteric fermentation 34Table 14 CH4 emission factor from cattle manure management 34Table 15 N2O Emission Factor direclty and indirectly from Cattle Manure in

Indonesia 34Table 16 Carbon stock per land cover type 52Table 17 Emission factor from decomposed Peat 53Table 18 Peat emission matrix of every land use change 54

viiiTECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

LIST OF PICTURES

Picture 1 Fuel consumption of each vehicle per kilometer 74

ixTECHNICAL GUIDELINE


GLOSSARY

APBN : State BudgetAPBD-K : City/District Government BudgetAPBD-P : Provincial Government Budget APL : Other Use Area Bappenas : National Development Planning AgencyBAU : Business As Usual ( condition without any action plans)BBM : Fuel BLH : Environmental AgencyBPS : National Bureau of StatisticsBRT : Bus Rapid TransitC dari Biomassa : Carbon from BiomassCF : Correction FactorCFL : Compact Fluorescent LampDAS : WatershedDBH : Diameter at Breast Height (for trees)DED : Detailed Engineering DesignDIPA : Budget Implementation DocumentsDIPDA : Local Development BudgetEF : Emission FactorEBT : New and Renewable EnergyEBTKE : New Renewable Energy and Energy ConservationESDM : Energy and Mineral Resources (EMR)Gg : Giga gram = 1.000.000.000 gramGRK : Green House Gas (GHG) HD : Village ForestHPT : Limited Production ForestHKm : Social ForestryHR : Community ForestHTI : Industrial Forest PlantationsHTR : Community Plantation ForestIKK : Key Performance Indicators IPAL : Waste Water Treatment PlantIPCC : Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeIPCC GL : Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National

Green House Gas InventoriesITS : Intelligent Transport System

xTECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

KLHS : Strategic Environmental Assessment KPH : Forest Management Unit KSN : National Strategic AreaLED : Light Emitting Diode LPJ : Accountability Report LPG : Liquid Petroleum GasMCK : Bathing, Washing and Toilet FacilityMRV : Measurement, Reporting, and VerificationMw : Mega WattMwH : Mega Watt hourNAMA : Nationally Appropriate Mitigation ActionNMT : Non-motorised transportPEP : Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting (MER)PHLN : Foreign Grants and LoansPJU : Public Street LightingPLN : State-Owned Electricity Company PLTB : Wind Power PlantPLTM : Minihydro Power PlantPLTMH : Micro Hydro Power PlantPLTS : Solar Power PlantPP : Government RegulationPTT : Integrated Crop Management (ICM)RAN-GRK : National Action Plans for Green House Gas Emission Reduction RAD-GRK : Local Action Plans for Green House Gas Emission Reduction REDD+ : Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and

the conservation of forests, the sustainable management of forests and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks

RIL : Reduced Impact LoggingRTR : Spatial Plan RTRW : Regional Spatial Plan SDH : Forest ResourceSF : Scaling FactorSITT : Crop-Livestock Integrated SystemSLPTT : Integrated Crop Management Field SchoolSRI : System of Rice IntensificationTIC : Traffic Impact ControlUPPO : Organic Fertilizer Processing UnitVTPI : Victoria Transport Policy Institute

1TECHNICAL GUIDELINE


1.1 Background

Implementation of National Action Plan and Local Action Plan for Green House Gas Emission Reduction (RAN-GRK and RAD-GRK) conducted by the central government and local governments constitutes a pivotal factor for the realization of Indonesian GHG emission reduction targets by 2020. The implementation effectiveness needs supporting through monitoring, evaluation and reporting (MER) in order to improve the performance of various GHG emission mitigation actions in a sustainable manner. In order to ensure consistent and quality MER implementation it is necessary to have a technical guideline which is expected to be used by all related stakeholders both at the national and sub-national level in accordance with respective authorities.

As an inseparable part of the General Guideline for MER of RAN/RAD-GRK implementation, the Technical Guideline for MER of RAD-GRK Implementation is an instrument for identifying mitigation action achievement and measuring the emission reduction. To accommodate all categories of activities under RAD-GRK, the Technical Guideline is divided into three parts, namely: 1) land-based sector group, including agriculture, forestry and peatland, 2) energy-based sector group including energy, transportation and industry, 3) waste management sector.

In detail, the Technical Guideline contains steps for monitoring the achievement of results and targets set in the planning stage. In addition, various emerging problems and initiatives to handle them can be assessed so that mitigation action performance can be improved in the following years.

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION

2TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING (MER) OF RAD-GRK IMPLEMENTATION

1.2 Goal

Goals of the Technical Guideline are: (1) Providing a reference especially for Local Governments and other relevant

parties to identify and collect information related to the implementation of the activities under RAD-GRK;

(2) Providing fill-in instructions for the achievement of mitigation actions and calculation of GHG emission reduction in the RAD-GRK.

1.3 Scope

The scope of the Technical Guideline includes how to fill in mitigation action and GHG emission reduction calculation in: (1) Land-based sector group covering agriculture, forestry and peatland sectors; (2) Energy-based sector group covering energy, transportation and industry

sectors, and (3) Waste management sector.

1.4 Definition

(1) MER of RAD-GRK The intended MER activities include monitoring, evaluation and reporting of

mitigation action achievement and the GHG emission reduction within RAD-GRK consisting of: a) Core activities, namely actions having direct impact on GHG emission

reduction and removal; and b) Supporting Activities, namely actions having indirect impact on GHG

emission reduction, and serve to facilitate the implementation of core activity or serve as conditions which will enable the implementation of core activity.

(2) GHG emission calculation Generally the calculation of total GHG emission produced/derived from every

mitigation action is obtained from this equation:

GHG EMISSION REDUCTION = ACTIVITY DATA X EMISSION FACTOR

In which: - Activity data are development-related activities or human activities which

generate or reduce GHG emission or removal.



In this MER activity, the activity data which are monitored and evaluated are obtained from main/specific performance indicators different from mitigation actions of each sector within provincial RAD-GRK documents.

- GHG emission or removal factors show the amount of emission/removal per unit of activity done.

If available, emission factor should use local emission factor (based on research). If not available, it is recommended to use local emission factors for other areas or national and regional emission factors based on respective sectors, as being developed by IPCC through Emission Factor Database. To make the reporting easier, the emission factors for every sector will be presented in the next chapters. If not available, the emission factor will be based on the decision of Minister of PPN/BAPPENAS with the Climate Change Coordination Team.

(3) Codification of Mitigation Actions To support the identification and assessment of Mitigation Actions especially

in the RAD-GRK and its relations with RAN-GRK, mitigation action codes have been developed. Qualification coding refers to codification format based on Sectors, Main Categories, Activity Categories in RAN, Province and RAD activities as shown below.

RAD 01 01 01 001

1 2 3 4 5

Local Sector Catagory of Province Mitigation Action Plan Core Activities Number 1-33 activities in or Supporting provincial Activities RAD-GRK

Notes:1) Code 1 is Local Action Plan (RAD)2) The next Two Digits (column 2) are Sector Category, in this case, Land-

Based Sector Group has Code 01, Energy-Based Sector Code 02, and Waste Management Sector Code 03

3) The next Two Digits (column 3) are Core Activity Category or Supporting Activity Category based on the outcomes of RAD-GRK activities.

4) The next Two Digits (column 4) shows the order of Provinces in accordance with the ordinal number in the Indonesian Bureau of Statistics (BPS).

5) The next Two Digits (column 5) shows the order of RAD-GRK activities at the Provincial Level



Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting (MER) of RAD GRK in the Forestry and Peatland sectors are conducted in three phases:1. Monitoring of RAD GRK activities;2. Evaluation of RAD GRK activities;3. Reporting of RAD GRK activities.

The explanation is as follows:1. Monitoring of RAD GRK activities conducted by Local Governments aims to :

a. Monitor Action Plan conducted in the local development process in the reporting year;

b. Monitor outputs from mitigation action implementation in accordance with key performance indicators;

c. Monitor change in activity data from emission reduction action in area unit.

The steps to be done in the monitoring phase are:a. To include a list emission reduction action plans already implemented in

local development in the reporting year. The activity data can be obtained from activity implementation report or local gocernment report or other

CHAPTER 2TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR LAND-BASED SECTOR GROUP


stakeholders’ ones (private sector, central agencies at the local level, as well as the socieity).

b. To categorize such activities into Core Activities and Supporting Activities;c. Categorize Core Activities into sub categories:

• Forestry’s Core Activities in Carbon Stock Reduction Avoidance SubCategory (PPCK) and Increase in Carbon Stock (PCK);

• Agriculture’s Core Activities in Fertilizing, Paddy Field Cultivation andAnimal Husbandry Sub Categories.

d. Include activity implementation achievements in key performance indicator parameters;

e. Include activity implementation achievements in the form of activity data represented by change in activity data area by land cover type.

2. Evaluation of RAD-GRK Activities conducted jointly by the local government and central government aims to: a. Evaluate GHG emission reduction action plan implementation by emission

reduction number/activity parameters;b. Evaluate change in activity data per land cover in the landscape scale in the

province;c. Evaluate implemented RAD GRK activities as recommendations for emission

reduction activities in the following year, including cost rationalization, resource availability, sustainability, etc.

In the evaluation phase, Local Governments are tasked with providing activity data in GHG emission reduction that describe change in ara by green house gas reduction activity resulted by the implemented activities/ budget investment; both with the use of government’s budget and other stakeholders’ including society.

Emission factor data is recommended by the central government and is subject to change in accordance with scientific advances in carbon sector research in Indonesia and across the world. If available, local governments can use local emission factor data which meet scientific requirements.

In the Guideline Book, Core Activity Calculation Form For serves as one of the support tools that can be used to evaluate emission reduction achievements by activity.

3. Reporting of RAD GRK Activities includes activities of:a. Reporting RAD GRK Activitiesb. Verifying RAD GRK Reportsc. Revising RAD GRK Reports;d. Approving RAD GRK Reports.



MER implementation of the Land-Based Sector Group mitigation actions includes (1) Agriculture Sector, and (2) Forestry and Peatland Sector. In this part there are Core Activity Form, GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form and Supporting Activity Form to measure mitigation action achievement in both sectors.

Core activities, namely activities that directly reduce GHG emission are grouped and defined as follows:01 Avoidance of the Reduction of Carbon Stock 02 Increase in Carbon Stock 03 Environmentally-Friendly and Sustainable Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Definitions and scope in core activity group are:1) Agriculture sector consists of 1 core activity category namely Environmentally-

Friendly and Sustainable Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, defined as agricultural and animal husbandry productivity improvement activities which aim at reducing emissions; for example, by reducing quantity of synthetic fertilizers, replacement with organic fertilizers, reduction of inundation period, use of low-emission rice variety, manure treatment, crop cultivation technology application such as SLI and SLPTT as well as livestock fodder management. In the sector group there are mitigation actions within RAD-GRK which can be grouped especially into the following activity groups:(a) Fertilizing system, for example reduction of synthetic fertilizer quantity,

replacement with organic/bio-fertilizers, and balanced use of fertilizers;(b) Rice Field Cultivation, for example improvement in plantation technique, use

of low-emission rice variety, and change in irrigation/inundation system, and(c) Livestock management such as livestock manure waste treatment and

livestock fodder management.

2) Forestry and Peat Land Sector have the following categories:(a) Avoidance of the Carbon Stock Reducation comprises any activities intended

to prevent, avoid and or reduce carbon stock reduction from land cover type with high carbon stock to land cover with low carbon stock. Examples of the activities in this activity category include guarding (prevention and reduction in illegal logging and encroachment), control over land use changes (no land use change from high carbon stock to lower one), as well as protection and prevention of forest fire; in the context of maintaining quantity and quality of forest cover. This category include activities intended to improve and or fix forest governance system and mentain stock carbon stability; including activities such as sustainable forest management (RIL in HPH) and operationaliation of Forest Managemetn Unit (KPH) by improving silviculture system.


(b) Increase in Carbon Stock: it is the category of activity aiming to increase carbon sink through improved quality and quantity of stands. Examples of mitigation actions in this category includes planting in forest area or other use area, forest and land rehabilitation, land reclamation after mining activity, mangrove rehabilitation, farming extensification/intensification from land with lower carbon stock.

For the calculation of GHG emission reduction from each mitigation action in the Forestry and Peatland and Agriculture sectors there are GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form consisting of:

(a) Core Activites for Forestry and Peatland Sector:I. Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change Activities Group in

Mineral LandII. Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change Activities Group in

PeatlandIII. Calculation Form for Fertilizing Activity Group in Peatland

(b) Core activities for Agriculture SectorI. Calculation Form for Fertilizing Activity Group II. Calculation Form for Rice Field Cultivation Activity Group III. Calculation Form for Animal Husbandry Activity Group

Supporting Activities that which have indirect impact on GHG emission reduction, and serve to facilitate the implementation of core activity or serve as conditions which will enable the implementation of core activity. Supporting activities are categorised into:1. Supporting Activities Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector, and2. Supporting Activities Form for Agriculture Sector.

2.1 AGRICULTURE SECTOR

2.1.1 Core Activity Form for Agriculture Sector Core Activity Form for Agriculture is used to monitor and evaluate each mitigation

action of agriculture sector in the Environmentally-friendly and Sustainable Agriculture and Animal Husbandry categories. The activities monitored and evaluated in this form are those included in the core activity category. This form is filled in by Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments according to their respective authorities..



2.1.2 Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector is used to monitor change

in activity data and emission factor in mitigation action implementation in the agriculture sector in order to calculate GHG emission reduction according to the emission sources calculated in BAU Baseline of RAD-GRK. Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector consists of:(a) Core Activity Calculation Form for Fertilizing System: is used to measure

emission reduction from low-emission agricultural activities related to fertilizing and organic materials returned to soil, both in rice fields, plantation, as well as other forms of agricultural activities which use fertilizers in improving agricultural production and reducing emissions;

(b) Core activity Calculation Form for Rice Field Cultivation: is used to measure emission reduction from low-emission agricultural activities related to rice field cultivation such as planting technique improvement, low-emission rice variety use, and irrigation/inundation systems;

(c) Core activity Calculation Form for Animal Husbandry Management is used to measure emission reduction from low-emission animal husbandry activities related to cattle manure management and cattle fodder management.

Box 1• Agricultural Activities related to land use change such as farming

intensification with mixed agricultural land/plantation/farming or rubber plantation and cocoa farming extension on abandoned lands, the emission reduction is calculated by using FORM PCK .

2.1.3 Supporting Activity Form for Agriculture Sector Supporting Activity Form for Agriculture Sector is used to monitor and

evaluate each mitigation action included in supporting activities category namely activities which enable conditions for core activities or will reduce emissions indirectly.

2.2 FORESTRY AND PEATLAND SECTOR

Monitoring and evaluation in forestry and peatland sector is used to monitor and evaluate mitigation action implementation in RAD-GRK to reduce emissions according to emission sources calculated in BAU Baseline RAD-GRK. Mitigation actions in forestry and peatland sector are related to land use change, including activities that increase carbon removals through planting and rehabilitation in degraded forests and activities that reduce GHG emissions through forest management improvement.


FORM

2.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

12a

2b3a

3b4a

14b

15a

4a2

4b2

5b

Code

RAD

LPJ

RAD

LPJ

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

Star

tUn

itUn

itEn

d

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion/

Core

Act

ivity

(2)

Loca

tion

(3)

Targ

et (4

)

RAD

(4a)

LPJ (

4b)

RAN/

RAD

– GR

K Im

plem

enta

tion

Perio

d (5

)



FORM

2.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor (

Cont

inua

tion

)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

6a7a

8a6b

7b8b

6c7c

8c9

10a

10b

1113

1214

156d

7d6e

7e6f

7f

APBN

APBN

APBD-P

APBD-P

APBD-K

APBD-K

PHLN

PHLN

Swasta

Swasta

Jumlah

Jumlah

Narasi

Jumlah

Unit Satuan

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

Plan

bas

ed o

n so

urce

(m

illio

n ru

piah

) (6

)

Budg

et u

se b

ased

on

sour

ce

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

(7)

Key

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

r (8

)Re

alize

d Ac

tiviti

es(%

)

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tCO

2eq)

Actu

al

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)

GHG

Emss

ions

w

ith

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tions

(tC

O2e

q)

Rem

arks

Co-B

enefi

t

Activ

ity

Impl

emen

ter

(10)

RAD

LPJ


Instructions to fill in Form 2.1.1

The Core Activity Form is used to monitor and evaluate each mitigation action included in core activity category, namely activities that generate GHG emission reduction directly. Filling in the form can be done as follows:

1. Column 1 is filled with mitigation action code (see the section on category codes of core activities and supporting activities of land-based sector);

2. Column 2 is filled with titles of each mitigation action both based on RAD and LPJ; if RAD activities are already mentioned in LPJ, fill in both columns

3. Column 3 is filled with location of core mitigation action;

4. Column 4 is filled with targets of each mitigation action along with the unit used for the target;

5. Column 5 is filled with the mitigation action implementation period;

6. Column 6 is filled with budget allocation plan for conducting each mitigation action in the relevant year;

7. Column 7 is filled with budget use;

8. Column 8 is filled with key performance indicator;

9. Column 9 is filled with mitigation action implemented.

10. Column 10 is filled with mitigation action implementing institution.

11. Column 11 is filled with the total BAU Baseline GHG emission level (if it is not possible for BAU Baseline by activity, it can be filled by BAU Baseline by sector. The BAU Baseline is pursuant to what is mentioned in the annex of Perpres (Presidential Regulation) No. 61/2011 and RAD-GRK document).

12. Column 12 is filled with GHG emissions generated by each mitigation action.

13. Column 13 is filled with GHG emission reduction from each implemented mitigation action.

14. Column 14 is filled with information on co-benefit resulted in mitigation action.

15. Column 15 is filled with additional information as necessary.



15a

6a5b

6b2

73

84

Code

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Dist

rict

Core

Act

ivity

Ca

tego

ryD

escr

iptio

n of

Ac

tivity

Enab

ling

Cond

ition

s

Cood

inat

e (5

)

*ESt

art

°N o

r °S

End

RAD

-GRK

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pe

riod

(6)

FORM

2.1

.2a

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor i

n Fe

rtili

zing

Sys

tem

Cat

egor

y

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


9a10

a10

b10

c9b

9c1

9c2

9c3

9d1

9d2

9d3

Type

of

agric

lutra

l lan

dCo

nten

t of C

Wat

er co

nten

tIn

dire

ct E

miss

ion

fact

or o

f N2O

Ar

ea si

ze (h

a)Ty

pe o

f Fer

tilize

rTy

pe o

f Fer

tilize

rPr

e-ac

tivity

Dos

e (k

g)Pr

e-ac

tivity

Dos

e (k

g)Po

st-A

ctiv

ity D

ose

(kg)

Post

-Act

ivity

Dos

e (k

g)

Use

of O

rgan

ic F

ertil

izer (

9c)

Use

of S

ynth

etic

Fer

tilize

r (9

d)

Activ

ity D

ata

(9)

Emiss

ion

Fact

or (1

0)

FORM

2.1

.2a

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor i

n Fe

rtili

zing

Sys

tem

Cat

egor

y (C

onti

nued

)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



FORM

2.1

.2a

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor i

n Fe

rtili

zing

Sys

tem

Cat

egor

y (C

onti

nued

)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

1112

a12

b12

c12

d12

e13

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n Ta

rget

in R

AD-G

RK

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (1

2)

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tCO

2eq)

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ac

hiev

emen

t (%

)

Emiss

ion

Afte

r Miti

gatio

n Im

plem

ente

d (tC

O2e

q)

Cum

ulat

ive

Achi

evem

ent

until

The

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar(tC

O2e

q)

Rem

arks


Instructions to fill in Form 2.1.2a

Form 2.1.2a Core Activity Calculation Form for Agriculture Sector in Fertilizing System Category is to be filled as follows:

1. Column 1: Determine mitigation action code; [See codification section]

2. Column 2: Mitigation action column is filled based on RAD-GRK mitigation plan for core activities which has been carried out until the reporting year;

3. Columns 3, 4, 5: Collect and complete information related to activity implementation location (administrative location, zone, coordinate points (if spatial data is available, shp file can be attached in the report).

4. Column 6: Complete mitigation action implementation period, including (6a) Starting period (year),and (6b) End period (year);

5. Column 7: Determine RAN/RAD-GRK core activity category pursuant to the set definition, namely Environmentally Friendly and Sustainable Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

6. Column 8 is filled with enabling conditions that support activity implementation. The enabling conditions can take the form of supporting activities mentioned in RAD-GRK and supporting core activities or enabling conditions such as policies;

7. Column 9 is filled with Activity Data Change, covering:

- Type of fertilized Farming Land: for example rice fields, plantation, etc;

- Area size of activities or area size in which fertilizers are applied;

- Fertilizer Utilization Data covering (10c1) type of organic fertilizers (green fertilizers, composts, bio-fertilizers, etc) (10c2) Pre-activity fertilizer dose/in conventional manner (kg), (10c3) Post-activity fertilizer dose by reducing synthetic fertilizer use (kg),

8. Column 10 is filled with emission factors from fertilizer:

- C content and water content (if applying organic fertilizers, refer to Decree or Regulation of Agriculture Minister (Peraturan Menteri Pertanian) No. 70 year 2011 on Bio-Fertilizers)

- N2O emission factor

9. Column 11 shows emission reduction targets from mitigation action implementation(pursuant to RAD-GRK)

10. Analyse change in activity data and emission factor on emission reduction activities and calculate emission reduction.

11. Column 12 is filled with emission reduction achievement:

- In the reporting year

- Cumulative from year start of RAD-GRK activities

- Percentage of emission reduction compared to targets in RAD-GRK

12. Column 13 contains remarks or information to be conveyed in the report.



Box 2To compare targets with emission reduction results, the activity data and emission factors used must be the same with those used in the development of BAU Baseline of RAD-GRK and those used in PEP of RAD-GRK. Therefore, in the emission reduction calculation, please recheck documentation when RAD-GRK was developed.

Example of Activities

Use of organic fertilizers

Return of organic materials to soil

Optimization of organic and un-organic fertilizers in balanced manner

Urea reduction in plantation of palm oil trees

UPPO (Organic Fertilizer Processing Unit)

Non-burnt straw waste

Description

Use of plant waste or cattle dunk matured (composting process) as organic fertilizers

Use of agricultural waste into organic fertilizers then it is applied to rice fields or dry land/plantation

Balanced use of fertilizers

Reduction in urea dose in palm oil plantation

Installation of agricultural waste treatment to produce organic fertilizers

Optimization of rice straw biomass by returning organic materials into farming lands

Activity Data

Type and number of un-organic fertilizers reduced

Type and number of organic fertilizers used, land area

Type and number of organic fertilizers used. Type and number of un-organic fertilizers reduced

Type and number of un-organic fertilizers reduced

Type and number of organic fertilizers produced (assumption, number produced equal to that applied)

Harvest land area, planted varieties, type of organic materials, plants’ age

Emission Factor

C and water contents


C and N contents

C and N contents


C contents

Table 1. Example of activities in

fertilizing activity group.


Box 3In RAD-GRK, the government advises farmers to use lower urea dose and substitute it with organic fertilizers; to calculate emission reduction, calculate reduction of urea fertilizer dose and compare it to the recommended dose, but added by organic fertilizers. The produced emission will be additional emission from urea use (with lower dose) added by emission from organic fertilizers.

13. Calculate Emissions in fertilizing activities: Equation used = Activity data x emission factor

UREA EMISSION = (M UREA X EF UREA)

Urea Emission = Annual C Emission from application of urea, ton CO2 per year; M urea = Number of urea fertilizer applied, ton per year; EF urea = Emission factor, ton C per (urea). Default IPCC (Tier 1) for IPCC is 0.20.

Example of Calculation: Name of Activity: Efficient use of urea dose in rice fields Activity data: •Paddyplantingarea:225.000ha •Riceureadoserecommended:250kg/ha/year •Efficientriceureadose:200kg/ha/year •EFurea=0,20(IPCC,2006)

Reduction in the number of urea fertilizer consumption on rice: 225.000 ha x (250-200) kg/ha x 10-3 = 11.250 ton

Reduced CO2 emissions = (M Paddy Urea x EF urea) = 11.250 ton/year x 0,20 = 2.250 ton CO2/year



FORM

2.1

.2b

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor o

f Ric

e Fi

eld

Cult

ivat

ion

Cate

gory

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

15a

6a5b

6b2

73

84

Code

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Dist

rict

Core

Act

ivity

Ca

tego

ryD

escr

iptio

n of

Ac

tivity

Enab

ling

Cond

ition

s

Cood

inat

e (5

)

*ESt

art

°N o

r °S

End

RAD

-GRK

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pe

riod

(6)


9a10

a10

b10

c9b

9c1

9c2

9c3

9d1

9d2

9d3

Type

of

agric

lutra

l lan

dCo

nten

t of C

Wat

er co

nten

tIn

dire

ct E

miss

ion

fact

or o

f N2O

Ar

ea si

ze (h

a)Ty

pe o

f Fer

tilize

rTy

pe o

f Fer

tilize

rPr

e-ac

tivity

Dos

e (k

g)Pr

e-ac

tivity

Dos

e (k

g)Po

st-A

ctiv

ity D

ose

(kg)

Post

-Act

ivity

Dos

e (k

g)

Use

of O

rgan

ic F

ertil

izer (

9c)

Use

of S

ynth

etic

Fer

tilize

r (9

d)

Activ

ity D

ata

(9)

Emiss

ion

Fact

or (1

0)

FORM

2.1

.2b

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r A

gric

ultu

re S

ecto

r of R

ice

Fiel

d Cu

ltiv

atio

n Ca

tego

ry (C

onti

nued

)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



FORM

2.1

.2b

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r A

gric

ultu

re S

ecto

r of R

ice

Fiel

d Cu

ltiv

atio

n Ca

tego

ry (C

onti

nued

)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

1112

a12

b12

c12

d12

e13

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n Ta

rget

in R

AD-G

RK

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (1

2)

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tCO

2eq)

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ac

hiev

emen

t (%

)

Emiss

ion

Afte

r Miti

gatio

n Im

plem

ente

d (tC

O2e

q)

Cum

ulat

ive

Achi

evem

ent

until

The

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar(tC

O2e

q)

Rem

arks


Instructions to fill in Form 2.1.2b

Steps for numbers 1-8 are similar to those in Core activity Calculation Form for Fertilizing System. The following steps are:

9. Collect activity data related to rice field cultivation, (compare with emission source and activity data used in the BAU Baseline development);

a. Annual harvest area,

b. Type of irrigation,

c. Type of planted plants, plants’ age, production per year;

Note: If spatial data is available, shp file is attached in the report

10. Collect information related to rice field cultivation emission factors, including documentation in the BAU Baseline development.

11. Analyze activity data and emission factors which change from Business as usual condition due to activity implementation. Examples of the activities can be seen in Table 2

12. Emission Calculation Method:

Equation used = ACTIVITY DATA X EMISSION FACTOR

For Example: Rice field land area = 60 ha Type of Inundation = intermittent Calculate daily emissions: Emissionrice field cultivation = Activity Data x Emission Factor = Land area x EF ch4 = 60 ha x 160 kg/ha/season x 21 = 201,6 tCO2e

Box 4If other activity data are obtained, for example rice varieties and inundation length; the scaling factor can be added.



Example of Activities

SRI (System of Rice Intensification) including organic rice cultivation

Irrigation

SLPTT

Description

Rice field intensification with organic farming by using organic fertilizers (note: in the development, un-organic fertilizers are also implemented)

Use of intermittent irrigation technology

- PTT Technological application (Integrated Plant Management):

- Balanced Fertilizing (use of organic ones and reducing un-organic)

- Irrigation system- Low-emission

productive varieties - ‘jajar legowo’

planting system

Activity Data

Annual harvest area, planted varieties, plants’ age

Annual harvest area, type of inundation

Annual harvest area, planted varieties, Balanced Fertilizing, efficient irrigation system, plants’ age

Monitored Emission Factor

Emission factors CH4 and N20

Emission factors CH4 and N2O (for N20, the value = 1)

Emission factors CH4 and N20

Table 2. Example of

activities in rice field cultivation

category


FORM

2.1

.2c

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor o

f Ani

mal

Hus

band

ry C

ateg

ory

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

15a

6a5b

6b2

73

84

Code

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Dist

rict

Core

Act

ivity

Ca

tego

ryD

escr

iptio

n of

Ac

tivity

Enab

ling

Cond

ition

s

Cood

inat

e (5

)

*ESt

art

°N o

r °S

End

RAD

-GRK

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pe

riod

(6)



9a9b

9c9d

9e10

a10

b9d

3

Type

of c

attle

Num

ber o

f cat

tle

Num

ber o

f bio

gas

(uni

t)

Emiss

ion

fact

or C

H4

from

ent

eric

ferm

en-

tatio

n

Volu

me

of b

ioga

s (m

3)

Emiss

ion

fact

or C

H4

from

cattl

e w

aste

tre

atm

ent

Volu

me

of m

anur

e (to

n/ye

ar)

Emiss

ion

fact

or N

2O

from

cattl

e w

aste

tre

atm

ent

Emiss

ion

Fact

or (1

0)Ac

tivity

Dat

a (9

)

FORM

2.1

.2c

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor o

f Ani

mal

Hus

band

ry C

ateg

ory

(Con

tinu

ed)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


1112

a12

b12

c12

d12

e13

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n Ta

rget

in R

AD-G

RK

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (1

2)

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tCO

2eq)

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)Pe

rcen

tage

of

Achi

evem

ent (

%)

Emiss

ion

afte

r Miti

gatio

n im

plem

ente

d (tC

O2e

q)

Cum

ulat

ive

Achi

evem

ent

until

the

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar(tC

O2e

q)

Rem

arks

FORM

2.1

.2c

Core

Act

ivit

y Ca

lcul

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor o

f Ani

mal

Hus

band

ry C

ateg

ory

(Con

tinu

ed)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



Instructions to fill in Form 2.1.2c

Steps for numbers 1-8 are similar to those in Core activity Calculation Form for Fertilizing rice field cultivation. The following steps:

9. Collect information related to cattle management: type and number of cattle;

10. Collect information related to emission factor of cattle management: number of biogas (if available/if number of cattle is not available), volume of biogas, and volume of cattle manure;

11. Collect emission factor data which change from cattle management.

12. Analyze activity data and emission factors in emission reduction activity application. Examples of activities can be seen in Table 3:

13. Emission Calculating Method:

Equation used = activity data x emission factor

Calculation steps: 1. Calculate direct N2O = (number of cattle x average annual excretion x cattle

management faction) x direct Emission factor N20 2. Calculate indirect N20 = volatilized N size x indirect EF N20 3. Calculate emission from CH4 from enteric fermentation and Cattle Manure

Treatment = number of cattle x EF CH4 4. Emission reduction is calculated by comparing actual emissions to Business

As Usual condition (condition in which there is no manure treatment and cattle enteric fermentation). Specifically, emission reduction in manure treatment is the amount of CH4 from managed/captured cattle’s manure.

Table 3. Examples of activities in

animal husbandry management

activity group.

Activity

Biogas

Integrated cattle management

Probiotic and supplement

SITT

Description

Use of cattle manure for bio-energy

Use of cattle manure for bio

Fodder fermentation for accelerated decomposition

Integration of plants and cattle:- Organic fertilizing- Fodder management- Manure treatment- Biogas

Monitored Activity Data

Number of cattle and volume of cattle manure /number of biogas and volume of biogas

Number of cattle

Area size, number of cattle, number of organic fertilizers, volume of biogas

Monitored Emission Factor

EF CH4 and N20 from cattle waste treatment

EF CH4 from enteric fermentation

EF CH4 and N20 from cattle waste treatment and cattle enteric fermentation,


18a

8b9b

9a9c

2a5a

2b5b

36

47

Code

Dist

rict

Core

act

ivity

su

ppor

ted

Area

Func

tion

or A

PL

Supp

ortin

g Ac

tivity

Ca

tego

ry

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

(2)

RAD

-GRK

Im

plem

enta

tion

Perio

d (8

)RA

D-G

RK A

ctiv

ity Ta

rget

(9)

Coor

dina

te(5

)

RAD

ESt

art

Indi

cato

rEn

dQ

uant

ityUn

itLP

JN,

S

FORM

2.1

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for A

gric

ultu

re S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

: Su

ppor

ting

Activ

ities

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



FORM

2.1

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for A

gric

ultu

re S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

ued)

SEC

TOR

: AG

RICU

LTU

RE

CATA

GO

RY

: Su

ppor

ting

Activ

ities

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

10a1

12a

10b2

12e

10a3

12c

11a

13b

10a2

12b

10b3

13a

10b1

12d

11b

14

Qua

ntity

Unit

APBN

%

Achi

evem

enRA

D

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

Plan

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

(11)

Activ

ity Im

plem

ente

r

Rem

arks

Budg

et u

seAc

cord

ing

to F

inan

cing

Sou

rce

(mill

ion

rupi

ah) (

12)

APBD

-KRA

DUn

it %

Achi

evem

enAP

BD-P

Priv

ate

sect

or fu

nd

Qua

ntity

LPJ

PHLN

LPJ

Achi

evem

ent i

n th

e Re

port

ing

Year

(10a

)Cu

mul

ativ

e Ac

hiev

emen

t unt

il The

Re

port

ing

Year

(10b

)

RAD

-GRK

Act

ivity

Impl

emen

tatio

n (1

0)



Supporting Activity Form is to be filled in as follows:

1. Column 1: is filled with mitigation action code (see code number for mitigation actions and code number for supporting activities for land-based sector);

2. Column 2: mitigation action column is filled based on mitigation action plans based on RAD-GRK or LPJ implemented until the reporting year. If RAD-GRK actions are mentioned in LPJ, columns 2a and 2b are filled wih the same details.

3. Columns 3,4,5: Collect and complete information related to activity implementation locations (administrative locations, area function /APL, coordinate points (if applicable))

4. Column 6 identifies the relevant core activity which are supported

5. Column 7 complements types of supporting activities based on categories:

(1) Institutional Capacity Building and Quality Improvement;

(2) Research;

(3) Provision of Service Infrastructures and Technology;

(4) Regulation/ Policy Development.

6. Column 8: RAD-GRK activity implementation period

7. Column 9: Determine emission reduction activity targets, including the amount (the target value) and Unit (Unit used)

8. Column 10: overview of achievement of activities implemented in the reporting year and overview of cumulative achievement since activity is commenced. Then, compare them with planned targets

9. Column 11 is filled with budget allocation plan to implement each mitigation action in the reporting year.

10. Column 12 is filled with budget use in the reporting year according to sources (APBN, APBD-P, APBD-K, PHLN, Private Sector fund).

11. Column 13 is filled with relevant institution(s) implementing mitigation action.




LIST OF TABLES OF EMISSION FACTOR, CORRECTION FACTOR AND SCALING FACTOR FROM AGRICULTURE SECTOR

Catagory Sub-category SF* SF Koreksi SF dari Kisaran (berdasarkan (berdasarkan Jenih Tanah IPCC riset di di Indonesi Guidelines 1996) Indonesia)

High Land N/A 0

Irigation Continuously inundated 1.0 1.00

Intermittent Single 0.5 irrigation Aeration (0.2 - 0.7)

0.46 0.38 - 0.53 Multiple 0.2 Aeration (0.1 - 0.3)

LowLand Rain- Pronetofloods 0.8

0.49 0.19 - 0.75 fed (0.5 - 1.0)

Prone to drought 0.4 (0 - 0.5)

Deep Water depth of 0.8 water 50 - 100 cm (0.6 - 1.0)

Water depth of <50 cm 0.6 (0.5 - 0.8)

Water regime before planting Agregat Disagregat Scaling factor Bias range Scaling factor Bias range (SFp) (SFp)Not inundated before planting 1 0.88-1.14(>180 days)Not inundated before planting 1.22-1.07 1.40 0.68 0.58-0.80(<180 days)Inundated before planting (>30 days) 1.9 1.65-2.18

Organic materials Conversion factor Bias range

Straw is added in short-term period (>30 days) before planting 1 0.97-1.04Straw is added in short-term period (<30 days) before planting 0.029 0.20-0.40Compost 0.05 0.01-0.08Organic fertilizer 0.14 0.07-0.20Green fertilizer 0.5 0.30-0.60

Table 4. Correction factor

(cf ) for various water treatment

in indonesia.

Table 5. Default ch4

emission scaling factor for water

regime before planting period.

Table 6. Default

converstion factor for use of various types of organic

materials

* Taken from various sources: IAERI 2001a; IAERI 2001b; IAERI 2001c; IAERI 2006a; IAERI 2007a; IAERI 2007b; Setyanto et al 2000; Setyanto et al 2002

CH4 Emission Factor: 16.09 (0.67-79.86) g/m2/season = 160.9 kg/ha

Source: based on IPCC, 2006

Source: based on IPCC, 2006


No Variety Average emissions (kg/ha/season) CF

1 Banyuasin 584.8 2.492 Batanghari 517.8 2.203 Siak Raya 235.2 1.004 Sei Lalan 152.6 0.655 Punggur 144.2 0.616 Indragiri 141.1 0.607 Air Tenggulang 140.0 0.608 Martapura 125.7 0.53

No Variety Average CF No Variety Average CF emissions emissions (kg/ha/season) (kg/ha/season)

1 Gilirang 496.9 2.46 21 Wayrarem 91.6 0.452 Fatmawati 365.9 1.81 22 Maros 73.9 0.373 Aromatic 273.6 1.35 23 Mendawak 255 1.264 Tukad Unda 244.2 1.21 24 Mekongga 234 1.165 IR 72 223.2 1.10 25 Memberamo 286 1.416 Cisadane 204.6 1.01 26 IR42 269 1.337 IR 64** 202.3 1.00 27 Fatmawati 245 1.218 Margasari 187.2 0.93 28 BP360 215 1.069 Cisantana 186.7 0.92 29 BP205 196 0.9710 Tukad Petanu 157.8 0.78 30 Hipa4 197 0.9811 Batang Anai 153.5 0.76 31 Hipa6 219 1.0812 IR 36 147.5 0.73 32 Rokan 308 1.5213 Memberamo 146.2 0.72 33 Hipa 5 Ceva 323 1.6014 Dodokan 145.6 0.72 34 Hipa 6 Jete 301 1.4915 Way Apoburu 145.5 0.72 35 Inpari 1 271 1.3416 Muncul 127.0 0.63 36 Inpari 6 Jete 272 1.3417 Tukad Balian 115.6 0.57 37 Inpari 9 Elo 359 1.7718 Cisanggarung 115.2 0.57 19 Ciherang 114.8 0.57 20 Limboto 99.2 0.49

Table 7. Correction factor (CF) of various varieties of field rice in Indonesia*

Table 8. Correction factor (CF) for various varieties of tidal rice in Indonesia*

* Taken from various sources: IAERI 2004a, IAERI 2003a, IAERI 2003b, IAERI 2002a, IAERI 2002b, IAERI 2002c, IAERI 2001d, IAERI 2001e, IAERI 1999, IAERI 1998a, IAERI 1997, Mulyadi et. al 2004, Setyanto, P 1999; Setyanto, P 2000; Setyanto, P 2004; Setyanto, et al 2008; Setyanto, et al 2000; Suharsih, et al 2004; Husin, Y.A 1994; Konsorsium PI 2009

** Baseline for rice variety is the variety generally planted by farmers in rice fields.

* Taken from various sources: IAERI 2004b; IAERI 2005; IAERI 2006b; IAERI 2006c; IAERI 2007c; IAERI 2007d. Baseline for rice varieties namely the variety generally planted by farmers in tidal rice land.



Emission Factor Value Range

From input N to dry land kg N2O-N per N input 0.01 0.003-0.03FrominputNforirrigationfield kgN2O-NperNinput 0.003 0.000-0.006For organic plants and savana in tropical area kg N2O-N per ha 16 5-48For organic forest soil in tropical area kg N2O-N per ha 8 0-24For cows, poultry and pigs kg N2O-N per ha 0.02 0.007-0.06For sheep and other cattle kg N2O-N per ha 0.01 0.003-0.03

Amelioration in peat soil CH4 CO2 N2O kg/ha/day

Control 16.28 53.28 0.00253Dolomite 13.07 48.99 0.00254Zeolit 8.09 17.10 0.00296Steel slag 6.25 24.67 0.00168Straw 6.46 56.76 0.00276Organic fertilizer 14.74 65.96 0.00153Silicate fertilizer 4.20 45.09 0.00220Compost 29.27 57.70 0.00041Organic fertilizer + dolomite 4.92 99.89 Pugam A 3.50 50.09 0.00458Volcanic ash 2.40 23.49 0.00689Fe Fertilizer 3.17 36.51 0.00471NI 3.41 55.54 0.00763

Emission Factor Value Range

From N deposit on soil and water surface kg N2O-N per NH3-N + 0.01 0.002-0.05 NOX-N tervolaltilisasiFrom N deposit on land and water surface kg N2O-N per NH3-N + 0.0075 0.0005-0.025 NOX-N tervolaltilisasiFracGasF volatilization from synthetic fertilizers kg N2O-N per NH3-N + 0.1 0.03-0.3 NOX-N per kg N yang digunakanFracGasF volatilization from all organic N kg N2O-N per NH3-N + 0.2 0.05-0.5fertilizers NOX-N per kg N yang digunakanFracGasF volatilization due to laundering kg N2O-N per NH3-N + 0.3 0.1-0.8 NOX-N per kg N yang digunakan

Table 9. Default N2O emission factor from managed land.

Table 10. Default emission factor for N2O indirectly from volatilization and laundering

Table 11. Emission factor from utilization of amelioran in peat soil converted into rice field.

Default value Urea = 20% from Urea Carbon size (CO(NH2)2) 0.02Source: based on IPCC, 2006

Default value Urea = 20% from Ures Carvon size (CO(NH2)2) 0.02Source: based IPCC, 2006

* Taken from Annual Report IAERI 2007-2011


Land Use CO2 (kg/ha/day)

New peat opening 70Natural peat 116Plants have yet to produce 77Plants have yet to produce 106Plants produce in 12 years 118Plants produce in 18 years 125

No Type of cattle Emission Factor of Correction factor/ CH4 (kg/cattle/year) K(t)

1 Beef cattle 47 0.722 Dairy cow 61 0.753 Buffalo 55 0.724 Sheep 5 5 Goat 5 6 Pig 1 7 Horse 18

No Cattle manure management system Emission factor for Emission factor for N2O-N direct emission N2O-N indirect emission

1 Savanna - -2 Daily sown 0 0.013 Piled dry 0.02 0.014 Poultry with collecting container 0.01 0.015 Poultry without collecting container 0.01 0.01

No Type of cattle Emission Factor CH4 (kg/ekor/tahun)

1 Beef cattle 12 Dairy cow 313 Buffalo 24 Sheep 0.25 Goat 0.226 Pig 77 Horse 2.198 Native chicken 0.029 Broiler 0.0210 Layer chicken 0.0211 Duck 0.02

Table 12. Peat soil emission factor with palm oil land use.

Table 13. CH4 emission factor from enteric fermentation.

Table 14. CH4 emission factor from cattle manure management.

Table 15. N2O emission factor direclty and indirectly from cattle manure in Indonesia

Reference: Final Report of Balingtan-PPKS-IPB, 2010

Source: based on IPCC 2006





2.2.1 Core Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector

Core Activity Form for Forest and Peatland Sector is used to monitor and evaluate RAD-GRK mitigation actions included in the core activity category. Core activities are the ones with direct impacts on emission reduction and in emission reduction calculation, defined as:- Activity data change compared to BAU scenario, or;- Emission factor change compared to BAU scenario

Activity data in Forestry and Peatland sector is forest/land area in which land use changes occur and result in emissions/ carbon sequestration, while emission factor is the amount of GHG emission or GHG removal from carbon stock change from a land use or land cultivation management system.

Core Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector is categorised as follow:

(a) Avoidance of the Carbon Stock Reducation comprises any activities intended to prevent, avoid and or reduce carbon stock reduction from land cover type with high carbon stock to land cover with low carbon stock. Examples of the activities in this activity category include guarding (prevention and reduction in illegal logging and encroachment), control over land use changes (no land use change from high carbon stock to lower one), as well as protection and prevention of forest fire; in the context of maintaining quantity and quality of forest cover. This category include activities intended to improve and or fix forest governance system and mentain stock carbon stability; including activities such as sustainable forest management (RIL in HPH) and operationaliation of Forest Managemetn Unit (KPH) by improving silviculture system.

(b) Increase in Carbon Stock: is activity category which aims to improve carbon sink through increased quality and quantity of stands. Example of mitigation actions include such activities as: planting in forest area or other use area, forest and land rehabilitation, post-mining land reclamation, mangrove rehabilitation, farming extensification/intensification from land with lower carbon stock.

2.2.2 Calculation Support Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector

Below is Calculation Form for Core activities that serves to support in the evaluation of the MER of RADGRK in terms of the calculation of emission reduction from mitigation actions in the Forestry and Peatland Sector. The Calculation form is categorised as follow:


2.2.2a Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change in Mineral Land2.2.2b Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change in Peatland.

2.2.3 Supporting Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector

Supporting Activity Form for Forestry and Peatland Sector is used to monitor and evaluate activities in forestry and peatland sector in RAD-GRK which constitute as enabling conditions or which indirectly contribute or important in achieving GHG emission reduction targets.



12a

2b3a

3b4a

14b

15a

4a2

4b2

5b

Code

RAD

LPJ

RAD

LPJ

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

Star

tUn

itUn

itEn

d

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tions

/Cor

e ac

tiviti

es (2

)Lo

catio

n (3

)Ta

rget

(4)

RAD

(4a)

LPJ (

4b)

RAN/

RAD

– GR

K Im

plem

enta

tion

Perio

d (5

)

FORM

2.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r For

estr

y an

d Pe

atla

nd S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


6a7a

8a6b

7b8b

6c7c

8c6d

7d6e

7e6f

7f

APBN

APBN

APBD

-PAP

BD-P

APBD

-KAP

BD-K

PHLN

PHLN

Priv

ate

sect

or fu

ndPr

ivat

e se

ctor

fund

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

Det

ails

Qua

ntity

Unit

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

Plan

bas

ed o

n So

urce

s (m

illio

n Ru

piah

) (6)

Budg

et U

se b

ased

on

sour

ces

(mill

ion

Rupi

ah)(7

)Ke

y pe

rform

ance

indi

cato

r (8

)

FORM

2.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r For

estr

y an

d Pe

atla

nd S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

ued)

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



FORM

2.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r For

estr

y an

d Pe

atla

nd S

ecto

r (co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

910

a10

b11

1213

1415

(%)

Real

ized

activ

ities

Activ

ity im

plem

enta

tion

(10)

Emiss

ion

BAU

(tCO

2eq)

GHG

Emiss

ion

with

M

itiga

tion

Actio

ns

(tCO

2eq)

Actu

al E

miss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)Re

mar

ksCo

-Ben

efit

RAD

LPJ



The Core Activity Form is used to monitor and evaluate each mitigation action included in the core activity category, namely activities contributing directly to GHG emission reduction, both in the activity data change and emission factors. The reporting of the form is done as follows:

1. Column 1 is filled with a number.

2. Column 2 is filled with titles of each mitigation action done.

3. Column 3 is filled with the location of the core mitigation action.

4. Column 4 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation and the unit of the quantity, in RAD-GRK and in LPJ.

5. Column 5 is filled with mitigation action implementation period.

6. Column 6 is filled with budget allocation plan to carry out each mitigation action in the relevant year.

7. Column 7 is filled with budget use.

8. Column 8 is filled with key performance indicators.

9. Column 9 is filled with realization of mitigation action targets.

10. Column 10 is filled with mitigation action implementing institutions.

11. Column 11 is filled with total GHG BAU Baseline emission level (if not possible for BAU Baseline per activity, fill in with BAU Baseline per sector. The BAU Baseline is in accordance with that mentioned in the annex of Perpres 61/2011 and RAD-GRK documents).

12. Column 12 is filled with GHG emission value produced by each mitigation action.

13. Column 13 is filled with GHG emission reduction from each mitigation action implementation.

14. Column 14 is filled with information on co-benefit resulted by the mitigation action.




FORM

2.2

.2a

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

land

Use

Cha

nge

in M

iner

al L

and

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

4a5a

4b5b

12

63

Miti

gatio

nAc

tion

Dist

rict

Area

Func

tion/

APL

Enab

ling

cond

ition

Coor

dina

te (4

)

0 ESt

art

0 N, 0 S

End

RAD

– GR

K Im

plem

enta

tion

Perio

d(6

)


7a1

8a7b

18c

7c1

9b10

7a2

8b7b

29a

7c2

9c

Initi

al C

ondi

tion)

(7a)

Activ

ity D

ata

(7)

Carb

on S

tock

in la

nd co

ver t

ype

(ton

C/ha

) (8

)BA

U RA

D-G

RK (7

b)Ac

hiev

emen

t in

the

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar (

7c)

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (1

5)

Land

cate

gory

fo

r pla

nned

la

nd u

se

Type

of a

ctua

l La

nd U

seAr

ea(H

A)Ar

ea(H

A)Ty

pe o

f Ini

tial

Land

Use

Star

tch

ieve

men

ts

of th

e Re

port

ing

Year

Emiss

ion

Afte

rM

itiga

tion

(tCO

2eq)

Rem

arks

Area

(Ha)

BAU

Emiss

ion

BAU

(tCO

2eq)

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

q)

FORM

2.2

.2a

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in M

iner

al L

and

(Con

tinu

ed)

Seco

nd s

ectio

n: A

void

ance

of R

educ

tion

of C

arbo

n St

ock

Cate

gory



FORM

2.2

.2a

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in M

iner

al L

and

(Con

tinu

ed)

Seco

nd s

ectio

n: A

void

ance

of R

educ

tion

of C

arbo

n St

ock

Cate

gory

7a1

7a3

7a5

97a

27a

77a

48

7a6

Capa

ian

Pada

Tahu

n Pe

lapo

ran(

7)

Type

of t

rees

Num

ber o

f tre

es/h

a1Pl

antin

g ar

ea

(ha)

Carb

on st

ock

in p

revi

ous l

and

cove

r (to

n C/

ha/y

ear)

Type

of I

nitia

l La

nd U

seAn

nual

Ave

rage

Car

bon

Sink

(to

n C/

ha/y

ear)

Rem

arks

Type

of

plan

ned

land

us

e

Carb

on si

nk in

repo

rtin

g ye

ar

(tCO

2eq)


Instructions to fill in Form 2.2.2a

Calculation Form is developed with the following colours:

Yellow Data needs to be filled in by user

Red Constant value (user do not need to fill in; data is available or determined/recommended)

Green Automatic calculation (will calculate automatically, user do not need to fill in)

Blue Optional, if data available

The GHG emission reduction calculation Form for forestry and peatland sector group is filled in with the following step:

A. Columns 1 until 6 is the sections with general explanation/details of mitigation action

1. Mitigation action column is filled in based on mitigation action plans in RAD-GRK implemented until the reporting year =column 1 ;

2. Collect and complete information related to activity implementation location (administrative location, area/zone, coordinate points (position of degree of °E as well as °N or °S; if spatial data is available, shp file is attached in the report) = columns 2,3,4.

3. Complete mitigation action implementation period = column 5

For example:

Forest rehabilitation is planned for 10 years starting from 2010 to 2020

4. Identify activities/enabling conditions for core activity. Enabling conditions can be a supporting activity(ies) which have indirect impact on GHG emission reduction, and serve to facilitate the implementation of core activity or serve as conditions which will enable the implementation of core activity = column 6.

B. The following columns explain changes in activity data as a result of mitigation action

1. Category of Avoidance of Reduction of Carbon Stock (PPCK)

a. Identify changes in activity data as a result of mitigation action, in which the changes are measures in the unit of area size, with the following explanation:

• Identificationofinitiallanduse(7a):Typeoflandusetobeintervenedin zone/APL



• IdentificationofBusinessasusuallanduse(7b):typeoflandusethatis expected if mitigation is not carried out

• Identificationofactuallanduseinreportingyear(7c):typeoflandusebecause of mitigation actions, which result in changes of BAU land use.

b. Carbon stock on each type of land use (column 8) will be automatically filled in. The carbon stock uses the value recommended by the Working Group on Climate Change of RAN-RADGRK.

c. Emission Reduction (column 9) in PPCK category explains the total of carbon stock that can be retained with mitigation actions. The equation is as follow:

d. Remarks column (column 10) is to be filled with additional information relating to changes of activity data or if provincial working group wants to use local emission factor and data..

2. Category Enhancement of Carbon Stock

a. Identifying change in activity data resulted from mitigation action whose change is explained in unit of area size; with the following explanation:

- Initial Land Use Type (7a1): Targeted Land Use Type as targets from mitigation actions;

- Land use type is expeted to be formed by planting activities and achieved in the reporting year (7a2): Land use type occurs due to implementation of mitigation actions resulting in the change in the initial land use type;

- Type of planted trees (7a3) can be included if data is available;

- Planting area (7a4) is the land cover width formed in the reporting year following the planting activities;

- Number of trees (7a5) describes the number of planted trees (if data is available). In relations to the planting area column (7a4), if the available data is the number of trees, the used assumption is 1 ha of planting = 1000 units of trees;

- Average annual removal (7a7) is average carbon removal per ha of planting. The data has been recommended by the RAN-RAD GRK National Working Group. The local data can be used if regions use more detailed data and in accordance with the methodologies recommended by the National Working Group.

Emission reduction = (Area Width without Mitigation- Area Width with mitigation action) x (Carbon Stock in without mitigation condition-Carbon stock with mitigation action)


b. Expected carbon sink in the reporting year (column 8) will be automatically filled out according to recommendations Technical Working Group of RAN-RAD GRK. The equation used is:

c. In column 9 include remarks or other information needed to mention as related to the reporting.

Equation of estimation of carbon stock change/removal from land use change is:

EMISSION/REMOVAL = ACTIVITY DATA X EMISSION FACTOR

Activity data = area per each land use change in the monitoring year (ha/year)

Emission factor = average carbon stock in changed land cover (for mineral soil)

Emission reduction = change in number of carbon stock from land cover class before mitigation action to land cover class planned in mitigation action

Box 4Notes for plantation (for example palm oil or rubber)• Inmineralland,missingCarbonStockduetolandusechange,forexample

from forest into palm oil, is monitored in Core Activity Calculation Form for Forestry and land use Change in mineral land;

• Inmineralland,emissionscausedbypalmoilfertilizingismonitoredinCoreactivity Calculation Form for Agriculture of Fertilizing Category;

• Inpeatland,bothemissionfromlandusechangeanddrainageandpalmoilfertilizing is monitored in Calculation Form for Forestry and Land Use Change in Peatland and Fertilizing in Peatland;

Emissions coming from palm oil processing plants are put into industrial sector group, instead of land-based sector group

Emission Reduction = (Planting Area width) x (Carbon stock in initial land use type – Expected average carbon sink in land use type with mitigation actions)



FORM

2.2

.2b

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in P

eatl

and

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

: Fo

rest

ry a

nd L

and

Use

Cha

nge

in P

eatla

nd

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

15a

6a5b

6b2

37

4

NoM

itiga

tion

Actio

nDi

stric

tAr

ea Fu

nctio

n /A

PLEn

ablin

g co

nditi

ons

Coor

dina

te (5

)

0 ESt

art

0 N, 0 S

End

RAD

- GRK

Im

plem

enta

tion

Perio

d(6

)


FORM

2.2

.2b

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in P

eatl

and

(Con

tinu

ed)

Seco

nd s

ectio

n: Id

entifi

catio

n of

cha

nges

in a

ctiv

ity d

ata

afte

r the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

miti

gatio

n ac

tion

8b1

8a1

8c1

8b2

8b3

8a2

8a3

8c2

8c3

Activ

ity D

ata

(11)

Initi

al C

ondi

tion

(8a)

BAU

RAD

- GRK

(8b)

Achi

evem

ent i

n th

e Re

port

ing

Year

(8c)

Type

of I

nitia

l La

nd U

seTy

pe o

f nex

t La

nd U

seTy

pe o

f act

ual

land

use

Area

(Ha)

Drai

nage

(c

m)

Drai

nage

(cm

)Dr

aing

se(c

m)

Area

(Ha)

Area

(Ha)



9a1

9b1

10b

9a2

9b2

9a3

9b3

10a

Star

tSt

art

Peat

land

Em

issio

ns (1

2a)

Carb

on S

ink/

Emiss

ion

in th

e Re

port

ing

year

(ton

C/h

a/ye

ar)

(9b)

Emiss

ion

Fact

or (

9)

Plan

ting

Data

(10)

BAU

BAU

Num

ber o

f tre

es/h

aTy

pe o

f tre

esAc

hiev

emen

t of

the

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar

Annu

al a

vera

ge

carb

on si

nk (t

on C

/ha

/yea

r)2

FORM

2.2

.2b

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in P

eatl

and

(Con

tinu

ed)

Third

sec

tion:

Cha

nges

in E

mis

sion

Fac

tor a

nd C

arbo

n Si

nk


11a

11b

11c

12

GHG

emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n in

tCO

2eq

(11)

Tota

l Em

issio

n Re

duct

ion

(tCO

2eq)

Peat

land

em

issio

n af

ter

miti

gatio

n (tC

O2e

q)Ca

rbon

sink

(tC

O2e

q)

Rem

arks

FORM

2.2

.2b

Calc

ulat

ion

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Land

Use

Cha

nge

in P

eatl

and

(Con

tinu

ed)

Four

th s

ectio

n: T

he re

sult

of E

mis

sion

Red

uctio

n ca

lcul

atio

n



Instructions to fill in Form 2.2.2b

The filling-in of supporting activity monitoring Form for forestry and peatland sector is as follows:

A. Columns 1 to 6 are parts that contain narrative/ general information on mitigation action

1. Mitigation action column is filled in based on mitigation action plans in RAD-GRK implemented until the reporting year =column 2 ;

2. Collect and complete information related to activity implementation location (administrative location, forest area/land use area, coordinate points (position of degree of °E as well as °N or °S); if spatial data is available, file shp is attached in the report) = columns 3,4 and 5.

3. Complete mitigation action implementationperiod = column 6.

4. Identify enabling conditions for core activity. Enabling conditions can be a supporting activity (ties) which indirectly reduces emission as part of core activities, as well as policies or enabiling conditions for implementation of core activities = column 7.

B. The following columns constitute parts that explain changes in activity data as results of implemented mitigation actions:

1. Identify changes in activity data as result of mitigation actions, in which the changes are explained in unit of area size; with the following explanation:

- Type of Initial Land Use (8a): Type of Land Use intended as targets of mitigation actions.

- Type of Business as usual Land Use (8b): type of land use occurs if mitigation actions are not implemented in target land use type.

- Type of achieved land use in the reporting year (8c): Type of land use resulted from implementation of migiation actions resulting in changes of BAU land use type.

- For land use change, emission calculation in peatland is assumed based on the drainage depth (8 a,b,c 3). In the MER of RAD GRK, drainage assumption has been recommended and will be fitted to supplementary guideline of IPCC 2006 for peatland.

Users only need to identify changes in activity data width on the target land use type after migiation action implementation.

2. Emission factors and stock carbon in each type of land use (kolom 9) will be automatically filled out according to recommendation from RAN-RAD GRK Tehnical Working Group.

3. The planting data (column 10) is filled in with types and number of trees if data is available. If the number of planted trees has been informed while the planting area is unknown, the planting area is assumed based on the assumption 1 ha=1000 units of trees.


4. Emission reduction (column 11) is obtained from addition between emission reduction or carbon stock reduction prevention and carbon stock addition.

5. Remark column (12) contains information to be added as remarks on activity data and if the Local working group want to include local data and emission factor.

LIST OF TABLES OF EMISSION FACTORS FROM FORESTRY AND PEATLAND SECTOR

Land use Average carbon stock (ton C/ha)

Primary Dry Land Forest 195.4Secondary Dry Land Forest 169.7Primary Mangrove Forest 170Primary Swamp Forest 196Plantation Forest 64Bushes 30*Plantation 63Settlement 5*Open Land 2.5*Grass 4.5Secondary Mangrove Forest 120Secondary Swamp Forest 155Swamp Bushes 30*Dry Land Farming 10*Mixed Dry Land Farming 30*Rice Field 2Ponds 0Airports /Ports 0*Transmigration 10Mining 0Swamps 0

Table 16. Carbon stock per land cover type.

Note : *Update from DirGen of Planology, MOF, December 2012

Box 5 Local emission factor data can be used if they have been published/ released officially by local government agencies (Provincial, district/city) (including government’s official website).



LAND USE Assumed drainage depth (cm) CO2 Emission (t/ha/year)

Primary peat forest 0 0Logged-over peat forest 30 19Community rubber 50 32Palm oil 60 38HTI ((Industrial Forest Plantation) 50 32Mixed crops/ Agro-forestry 50 32Peat Bush 30 19Seasonal crop 30 19Settlement 70 45Grass/ferns 30 19Ricefields 10 6Mining 100 64

Table 17. Emission

factor from decomposed

peat.

Notes:

Emissions t CO2/ha/year = drainage depth (cm) * 0.91 (according to Hooijer 2006, 2010)

Modification for root respiration correction: ~30% (according to Fahmudin, et al. 2010)

Emission t CO2/ha/year = 0.7 * drainage depth (cm) * 0.91 (according to Hooijer 2006, 2010)

Source: Fahmuddin et al, 2013

Box 6Land use class adjustment:1. City forest can take the form of plants forest/ secondary forest, depending on: a. Land covers b. Vegetation type 2. HKm (community forest) and Village Forest or social forestry generally in

secondary forest or in primary forest which provide the community with the right for cultivation; or it can take the form of agro-forestry in degraded forests

3. People’s forest and People Plantation Forest generally take the form of plantation forest.


Prim

ary D

ry

Land

For

est

0 9.

5 0

0 16

9.

5 19

22

.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

16

3 0

0 22

.5

32

0

Seco

ndar

y Dry

La

nd F

ores

t 9.

5 19

9.

5 9.

5 25

.5

19

28.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25

.5

12.5

9.

5 9.

5 32

41

.5

9.5

Prim

ary M

angr

ove

Fore

st 0

9.5

0 0

16

9.5

19

22.5

9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 16

3

0 0

22.5

32

0

Prim

ary S

wam

p Fo

rest

0 9.

5 0

0 16

9.

5 19

22

.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

16

3 0

0 22

.5

32

0

Plan

tatio

n Fo

rest

16

25.5

16

16

32

25

.5

35

38.5

25

.5

25.5

25

.5

25.5

25

.5

25.5

32

19

16

16

38

.5

48

16

Bush

es

9.5

19

9.5

9.5

25.5

19

28

.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25.5

12

.5

9.5

9.5

32

41.5

9.

5

Plan

tatio

n 19

28

.5

19

19

35

28.5

38

41

.5

28.5

28

.5

28.5

28

.5

28.5

28

.5

35

22

19

19

41.5

51

19

Settle

men

t 22

.5

32

22.5

22

.5

38.5

32

41

.5

45

32

32

32

32

32

32

38.5

25

.5

22.5

22

.5

45

54.5

22

.5

Open

Lan

d 9.

5 19

9.

5 9.

5 25

.5

19

28.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25

.5

12.5

9.

5 9.

5 32

41

.5

9.5

Gras

s 9.

5 19

9.

5 9.

5 25

.5

19

28.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25

.5

12.5

9.

5 9.

5 32

41

.5

9.5

Seco

ndar

y M

angr

ove

Fore

st 9.

5 19

9.

5 9.

5 25

.5

19

28.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25

.5

12.5

9.

5 9.

5 32

41

.5

9.5

Seco

ndar

y Sw

amp

Fore

st 9.

5 19

9.

5 9.

5 25

.5

19

28.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25

.5

12.5

9.

5 9.

5 32

41

.5

9.5

Swam

p Bu

sh

9.5

19

9.5

9.5

25.5

19

28

.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25.5

12

.5

9.5

9.5

32

41.5

9.

5

Dry L

and

Farm

ing

9.5

19

9.5

9.5

25.5

19

28

.5

32

19

19

19

19

19

19

25.5

12

.5

9.5

9.5

32

41.5

9.

5

Peat

land

Emiss

ion

Primary Dry Land Forest

Secondary Dry Land Forest

Primary Mangrove Forest

Primary Swamp Forest

Plantation Forest

Bushes

Plantation

Settlement

Open Land

Grass

Secondary Mangrove Forest

Secondary Swamp Forest

Swamp bush

Dry Land Farming

Mixed Dry Land Farming

Rice Field

Pond

Airport/Port

Transmigraton

Mining

Swamps

Tabl

e 18

. Pe

at e

mis

sion

mat

rix o

f eve

ry la

nd u

se c

hang

e



Mixe

d Dr

y Lan

d Fa

rming

16

25

.5

16

16

32

25.5

35

38

.5

25.5

25

.5

25.5

25

.5

25.5

25

.5

32

19

16

16

38.5

48

16

Ricefie

ld3

12.5

33

19

12.5

22

25.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

12.5

19

63

325.5

35

3

Pond

0

9.5

0 0

16

9.5

19

22.5

9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 16

3

0 0

22.5

32

0

Airp

ort/

Port

0 9.

5 0

0 16

9.

5 19

22

.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

9.5

16

3 0

0 22

.5

32

0

Tran

smigr

ation

22

.5

32

22.5

22

.5

38.5

32

41

.5

45

32

32

32

32

32

32

38.5

25

.5

22.5

22

.5

45

54.5

22

.5

Mini

ng

32

41.5

32

32

48

41

.5

51

54.5

41

.5

41.5

41

.5

41.5

41

.5

41.5

48

35

32

32

54

.5

64

32

Swam

p 0

9.5

0 0

16

9.5

19

22.5

9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 9.

5 16

3

0 0

22.5

32

0

Peat

land

Emiss

ion

Primary Dry Land Forest

Secondary Dry Land Forest

Primary Mangrove Forest

Primary Swamp Forest

Plantation Forest

Bushes

Plantation

Settlement

Open Land

Grass

Secondary Mangrove Forest

Secondary Swamp Forest

Swamp bush

Dry Land Farming

Mixed Dry Land Farming

Rice Field

Pond

Airport/Port

Transmigraton

Mining

Swamps


18a

8b9b

9a9c

2a5a

2b5b

36

47

Code

Dist

rict

Core

act

ivity

su

ppor

ted

Area

Fu

nctio

n or

APL

Supp

ort-

ing

Activ

ity

Cate

gory

Miti

gatio

nAc

tion

(2)

RAD

-GRK

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pe

riod

(8)

RAD

-GRK

Act

ivity

Targ

et

(9)

Coor

dina

te(5

)

RAD

0 ESt

art

Indi

cato

rEn

dQ

uant

ityUn

itLP

J0 N,

0 S

FORM

2.2

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Peat

land

Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

: Su

ppor

ting

Activ

ity

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



FORM

2.2

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for F

ores

try

and

Peat

land

Sec

tor (

Cont

inua

tion

)

SEC

TOR

: FO

REST

RY A

ND

PEA

TLA

ND

CATA

GO

RY

: Su

ppor

ting

Activ

ity

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:

10a1

12a

10b2

12e

10a3

12c

11a

13b

10a2

12b

10b3

13a

10b1

12d

11b

14

Qua

ntity

Unit

APBN

%

Achi

eve-

men

tRA

D

Budg

et a

lloca

tion

plan

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

(11)

Activ

ity Im

plem

ente

r

Rem

arks

Real

ized

Fund

Abs

oprt

ion

acco

rdin

g to

Fi

nanc

ing

Sour

ces (

mill

ion

rupi

ah)

(12)

APBD

-KRA

DUn

it%

Achi

eve-

men

tAP

BD-P

Priv

ate

sect

or fu

ndQ

uant

ityLP

JPH

LNLP

J

Achi

evem

ent i

n th

e Re

port

ing

Year

(1

0a)

Cum

ulat

ive

Achi

evem

ent u

ntil

the

Repo

rtin

g Ye

ar (1

0b)

RAD

-GRK

Act

ivity

Impl

emen

tatio

n (1

0)



The filling-in of supporting activity monitoring Form for forestry and peatland sector is as follows:

1. Column 1: fill in the mitigation action code (see the code of mitigation activities and supporting activities of land-based sector);

2. Column 2: Mitigation action column is filled in based on mitigation action plans in RAD-GRK which have been carried out until the reporting year

3. Columns 3, 4, 5: Collect and complete information related to activity implementation location (administrative location, area/zone, coordinate points (if spatial data is available, shp file is attached in the report).

4. Column 6: relevant core activity which is supported

5. Column 7: Complete supporting activity category based on the classification such as:

(1) Institutional Capacity Building and Quality Improvement

(2) Research;

(3) Provision of Service Infrastructure and Technology;

(4) Regulation/Policy Development.

6. Column 8: Complete mitigation action implementation period

7. Column 9: Determine emission reduction activity targets, including the number and unit (the units used)

8. Column 10: overview of achievement of activities implemented in the reporting year and overview of cumulative achievement since activity is commenced. Then, compare them with planned targets

9. Column 11 is filled with budget allocation plans to carry out each mitigation action in the reporting year.

10. Column 12 is filled with realized fund in the reporting year.

11. Column 13 is filled with mitigation action funding sources (APBN, APBD-P, APBD-K, PHLN, Private sector fund).


13. Column 15 is filled with information or supporting remarks to be conveyed in the report



The implementation of monitoring and evaluation of energy-based sector group mitigation activities consists of two sectors namely: (1) Energy sector, and (2) Transportation sector. In this section Core Activity Form is made available to measure mitigation action achievement in both sectors. For calculation of GHG emission reduction from each mitigation action in energy and transportation sectors there are GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form containing indicators, parameter, activity data as well as emission factors. Supporting activities which can reduce green house gas emission can indirectly be reported in Supporting Activity Form.

3.1 ENERGY SECTOR

3.1.1 Core Activity Form for Energy Sector

This Core Activity Form is used to monitor and evaluate each mitigation action including in core activity category namely activities that directly generate GHG emission reduction. This form is filled in by Central Government, Provincial Governments/District/City Governments based on their respective authorities.

Calculation table is arranged by using three different colours with the following explanation:

CHAPTER 3TECHNICAL GUIDELINE FOR ENERGY-BASED SECTOR GROUP


For core activities of the energy sector, mitigation actions are generally grouped and defined as follows:(1) Utilization of renewable energy (on grid); This mitigation action is an effort from supply side to generate electricity by

utilizing renewable energy (outside fossil fuel). Included in this category are: development of Mini-hydro Power Plants (PLTM), development of Micro-hydro Power Plants (PLTMH), Wind Power Plants (PLTB), and Solar Power Plants (PLTS) in which electricity will be distributed through national power grid.

(2) Utilization of renewable energy (off grid); The mitigation action is similar to the former mitigation action, but the locations

are scattered so that generated electricity can reach out isolated areas outside the national power grid. Included in this category are: development of PLTM, PLTMH, PLTB, PLTS and development of Biomass Power Plant (from palm kernel shell).

(3) Fuel substitution; The mitigation action is related to the demand side, in which demand for energy

will decrease due to the use of other energy sources. Included in this category are substitution of kerosene to LPG, to biogas, and substitution of diesel fuel to biodiesel.

(4) Energy efficiency, The mitigation action is also related to the demand side, in which demand for

electricity will decrease due to the use of energy-saving and highly efficient devices. Included in this category are utilization of CFL (four star) energy –efficient lamps and utilization of LED lights for street lighting.

A number of Provincial Energy and Mineral Resources Agency (Distamben or Dinas ESDM) have also monitored and calculated emission reduction from post-mining reclamation activities. The activity data and GHG emission reduction from post-mining reclamation activities are reported to the Working Group of Land-Based Sector Climate Change as emission reduction from land-based sector.

Data to be filled in by users

Constant (users do not need to fill in; data is provided or determined)

Calculation result (will calculate automatically, users do not need to fill in)

Yellow

Red

Green



3.1.2 GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form for Energy Sector

For GHG emission reduction calculation from each mitigation action in energy sector, there is GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form for Energy Sector containing indicator, parameter, activity data as well as emission factors needed. The parameters needed for each activity category are: - Renewable energy (on grid), namely production of energy (sold energy) in MWh. - Renewable energy (off grid), namely installed capacity (MW) and number of

operational hours in a year. - Energy conversion from kerosene to LPG, namely the number of unit s of LPH

sold (in kg) and ratio of substitution of LPG for kerosene. - Energy conversion from kerosene to biogas namely volume of total digester

biogas and substitution value of biogas for kerosene . - Energy conversion from diesel fuel to biodiesel, namely biodiesel volume used

and substitution value of biodiesel for diesel fuel.- Energy efficiency from the use of CFL lamps, namely the number of units

installed and energy consumption per unit. - Energy efficiency form the use of LED lamps for Public Street Lighting namely

the number od units installed and energy consumption per unit.

The Working Group on Climate Change in the Energy Sector has calculated the national emission factors used to calculate emission reduction from each mitigation action. The calculation is derived from IPCC Guidelines 2006 based on the type and quality of energy (fuel) or emission factors set beforehand.

3.1.3 Supporting Activity Form for Energy Sector

Supporting Activity Form for Energy Sector is used to monitored and evaluate mitigation activities included in the supporting activity category, namely activities predicted to generate GHG emission reduction indirectly. This form is filled in by the Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments based on their respective authorities.


15c

25d

4b7a

8c3

6a5a

7b8d

4a6b

8b5b

8a8e

Code

Miti

gatio

nAc

tion

Prog

ram

/Ac

tivity

Loca

tion

Budg

et a

lloca

tion

plan

s (m

illio

n ru

piah

)

Budg

et u

se(m

illio

n ru

piah

)Fi

nanc

ing

Sour

ces

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

Targ

et

RAD

RAD

RAD

RAD

RAD

APBN

APBD

-KQ

uant

ityQ

uant

ityLP

JLP

J

LPJ

LPJ

LPJ

APBD

-PPH

LNPr

ivat

ese

ctor

fund

Unit

Unit

FORM

3.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Ene

rgy

Sect

or

SEC

TOR

: EN

ERG

Y

CATA

GO

RY

: Co

re A

ctiv

ities

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



9a13

9b11

b10

a14

1211

a15

16

RAD

Impl

e-m

enta

tion

Real

ized

Activ

ity

Activ

ity

Impl

emen

ter

Actu

al E

miss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

)Co

-Ben

efit

Rem

arks

End

Star

tRA

D

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tCO

2e)

(%)

LPJ

Emiss

ion

Redu

cton

Ta

rget

(tC

O2e

)

FORM

3.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Ene

rgy

Sect

or (C

onti

nuat

ion)

SEC

TOR

: EN

ERG

Y

CATA

GO

RY

: Co

re A

ctiv

ities

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



The Core activity Form is filled in with the following step:


2. Column 2 is filled with the title of each mitigation action done (based on the authority of each government level).

3. Column 3 is filled with the title of Program/Activity based on LPJ related to mitigation action in column 2.

4. Column 4 is filled with the location of core mitigation action.

5. Column 5 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation in RAD-GRK and in LPJ, and the unit of the quantity.

6. Column 6 is filled with budget allocation plan to carry out each mitigation action in the reporting year.

7. Column 7 is filled with budget use in the reporting year.

8. Column 8 is filled with mitigation action financing sources (APBN, APBD-P, APBD-K, PHLN, Private sector fund).

9. Column 9 is filled with mitigation action implementation period based on RAD-GRK.

10. Column 10 is filled with realized mitigation actions based on RAD- GRK targets.


12. Column 12 is filled with total BAU Baseline Emissions according to what is mentioned in the annex of Perpres (Presidential Regulation) 61/2011 and RAD-GRK documents. If not possible, it can be filled with BAU Baseline per sector.

13. Column 13 is filled with GHG emission reduction targets generated from each mitigation action (according to what is mentioned in the annex of Perpres 61/2011 and RAD-GRK documents).

14. Column 14 is filled with GHG emission reduction from each mitigation action implementation.

15. Column 15 is filled with information of co-benefits resulted by the mitigation action.




No.

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

Pa

ram

eter

1

Para

met

er 2

Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r Em

issi

on R

educ

tion

RENE

WAB

LE E

NERG

y (O

N GR

ID)

No.

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

In

stal

led

Capa

city

En

ergy

Gen

erat

ed

Activ

ity D

ata

Emis

sion

Fac

tor*

Em

issi

on R

educ

tion

(MW

) in

a y

ear

(tC

O2e/

MW

h)

(tCO2

e)

(MW

h)

1 De

velop

men

t of

PLTM

M

Wh

Ca

pacit

y ins

talle

d &

0

0

En

ergy

gen

erat

ed2

Deve

lopm

ent o

f PL

TMH

M

Wh

Capa

city i

nsta

lled

&

0

0

Ener

gy g

ener

ated

3 De

velop

men

t of

PLTB

M

Wh

Ca

pacit

y ins

talle

d &

0

0

En

ergy

gen

erat

ed

4 De

velop

men

t of P

LTS

MW

h

Capa

city i

nsta

lled

&

0

0

Ener

gy g

ener

ated

ENER

GI T

ERBA

RUKA

N (O

FF G

RID)

No.

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

In

stal

led

Capa

city

Op

erat

ing

Hour

s Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r PLT

D Em

issi

on R

educ

tion

(MW

)

(tC

O2e/

MW

h)

(tCO2

e)

1 De

velop

men

t of

PLTM

M

Wh

Ca

pacit

y ins

talle

d &

oper

ating

6132

0

0,8

0

hour

s (70

%X8

760)

2 De

velop

men

t of

PLTM

H

MW

h In

stalle

d ca

pacit

y & O

pera

ting

61

32

0 0,

8 0

ho

urs (

70%

X876

0)3

Deve

lopm

ent o

f PL

TB

MW

h In

stalle

d ca

pacit

y & O

pera

ting

17

52

0 0,

8 0

ho

urs (

20%

X876

0)4

Deve

lopm

ent o

f PLT

S

MW

h In

stalle

d ca

pacit

y & O

pera

ting

17

52

0 0,

8 0

ho

urs (

20%

X876

0)5

Deve

lopm

ent o

f PLT

Biom

assa

M

Wh

Insta

lled

capa

city &

Ope

ratin

g

788

4 0

0,8

0

(palm

kern

el sh

ell)

ho

urs (

90%

X876

0)

FORM

3.1

.2 E

mis

sion

Cal

cula

tion

For

m fo

r Ene

rgy

Sect

or


FUEL

SUB

STIT

UTIO

N

NO

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

Nu

mbe

r of

Subs

titut

ion

Ratio

Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r of

Emis

sion

Red

uctio

n

So

ld U

nit (

kg)

Kero

sene

(kg

CO2e

/lite

r) (tC

O2e)

1 Su

bstitu

tion

of K

eros

ene

to L

PG

Liter

of k

eros

ene

To

tal w

eight

of L

PG d

istrib

uted

1,75

4385

965

0 2,

58

0

and

subs

titutio

n ra

tio

NO

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

kato

r Pa

ram

eter

Vo

lum

e Di

gest

er

Subs

titut

ion

Ratio

Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r of

Emis

sion

Red

uctio

n

(ju

mla

h un

its x

Ke

rose

ne

(tCO2

e)

uk

uran

uni

t)

(k

gCO2

e/lit

er)

2 Su

bstitu

tion

of ke

rose

ne to

Lit

er o

f ker

osen

e Vo

lume

of d

igeste

r and

0,62

0

2,58

0

bio

gas (

only

emiss

ion re

ducti

on

su

bstitu

tion

fro

m fu

el co

nver

sion

is

calcu

lated

)

NO

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

Vo

lum

e bi

odie

sel

Subs

titut

ion

Ratio

Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r of

Emis

sion

Red

uctio

n

ya

ng d

igun

akan

(kL)

Ke

rose

ne (t

CO2

e/ki

lolit

er)

(tCO

2e)

3 Su

bstitu

tion

of d

iesel

fuel

to

Liter

of d

iesel

fuel

Volum

e of

biod

iesel

used

and

0,56

0

2,6

0

biodie

sel (

blend

ing b

y

subs

titutio

n ra

tio

PT. P

erta

mina

)

ENER

Gy E

FFIC

IENC

y

NO

Actio

n Pl

an

Indi

cato

r Pa

ram

eter

Ju

mla

h Un

it E

nerg

y us

ed/

Ac

tivity

Dat

a Em

issi

on F

acto

r*

Emis

sion

Red

uctio

n

/ lam

p po

ints

(tCO2

e/M

Wh)

(t

CO2e

)

(kW

h/La

mpu

)

1 Us

e of

CFL

lam

ps (4

star

)

KWh

Num

ber o

f unit

s and

40,8

8 0

0

en

ergy

use

d/ la

mp

point

s2

Use

of L

ED la

mps

for P

ublic

KW

h Nu

mbe

r of u

nits a

nd

0

0

Stre

et L

ightin

g

ener

gy u

sed/

lam

p po

ints

Not

e: *

) Adj

uste

d to

em

issi

on fa

ctor

of t

he lo

cal s

yste

m o

r ele

ctric

ity m

eter




The GHG Emission Reduction Calculation Form for Energy Sector is filled with the following step:

1. The mitigation action column is filled based on mitigation action plans in RAD-GRK divided into 4 categories.

2. Indicators contain units serving as reference. Indicators used for renewable energy is MWh (Megawatt hour) . Indicator for fuel substitution is liter of kerosene and liter of diesel fuel, while indicator for energy efficiency is kWh (Kilowatt hour).

3. Parameter column contains measurable indicators to identify the size of activity data. Below is the parameter for energy sector:

• Renewableenergy(ongrid):energyproduction(soldenergy)inMWh.Dataonenergy production can be obtained from provincial Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency.

• Renewableenergy(offgrid):installedcapacity(MW)andnumberofoperationalhours in a year. Data on installed capacity can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency and PLN. The number of operational hours is determined (a “constant” value). Off grid PLTM and PLTMH are assumed to operate for 70% in a year, meaning, operational hours are 6132 hours/year. Assumed operational hours for PLTB and PLTS are 20% a year, meaning, 1752 hours/year. For Biomass Power Plant, in addition to installed capacity and number of operational hours in a year, anoother parameter is needed: efficiency. Assumed operational hours of Biomass Power Plant is 7884 hours (90% in a year) and the efficiency is 35%.

• FuelsubstitutionofLPGforkerosene:numberofLPHunitssold(inkg)andratioof substitution of kerosene to LPG. The data on the number of sold LPG units can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency, while the ratio of substitution of kerosene to LPG uses constant value which shows comparison of kerosene and LPG energies (1 liter of kerosene is equal to 0.57 kg LPG).

• Energyconversionfromkerosenetobiogas:thetotalvolumeofbiogasdigesterand substitution value of kerosene to biogas. The total volume of biogas digester can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency. Meanwhile, the substitution value of kerosene to biogas uses constant value.

Energy sector calculates emission reduction coming from fossil fuel substitution (in this case kerosene) to biogas, while emission reduction coming from methane gas catchment from cattle manure treatment is calculated by the Working Group of Climate Change in Land-based Sector. Data sources for the utilization of biogas directly for replacing kerosene, can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency or coordinated with the Working Group of Climate Change in Land-Based Sector.

1 Satuan dalam megawatt hour (Mwh) setara dengan 1,000 Kilowatt hours (Kwh).


• Thevolumeofbiodieselused(liter)andsubstitutionratiobetweenbiodieselanddiesel fuel. Use of biodiesel as a substitution from diesel fuel reduces GHG emission by 56% (a study from Indonesian Palm Oil Council). Total volume of biodiesel use can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency.

• Energy efficiency from CFL lamp use: number of installed units and energyconsumption per unit. Data on the number of installed unit can be obtained from local Energy and Mining/Mineral Resources Agency. Energy consumption per unit is energy consumption of replaced lamps. It is assumed that replaced lamps are 14-watt lamps as they are mostly used and the daily use is only for 8 hours.

• Energy efficiency from LED lamp use for Public Street Lighting: number ofinstalled units and energy consumption per unit. Energy consumption per unit is energy consumption of replaced conventional PJU (Public Street Lighting) lamps. Data on the energy consumption is obtained from monitoring or sampling directly conducted by PJU or obtained from average number of PLN power use for PJU divided by the number of lamp points.

For measuring emission reduction as the result of energy-efficient lamp use (both LED or other types of lamps) for Public Street Lighting, the provinces that conduct this mitigation action are advised to add meter-installing program so that more accurate data can be obtained;

4. Activity data column is obtained from measureable parameters based on the data inserted in the previous columns. • Renewableenergy(ongrid):

ACTIVITY DATA = ENERGY PRODUCTION (SOLD ENERGY)

• Renewableenergy(offgrid): ACTIVITY DATA = INSTALLED CAPACITY X NUMBER OF OPERATIONAL HOURS IN A YEAR

Especially for Biomass Power Plant (PLT) : ACTIVITY DATA = INSTALLED CAPACITY X NUMBER OF OPERATIONAL HOURS IN A YEAR X EFFICIENCY OF BIOMASS POWER PLANT(PLT)

(it is assumed that efficiency of Biomass Power Plant is 35%)• EnergyconversionfromkerosenetoLPG:

EMISSION REDUCTION = TOTAL WEIGHT OF SOLD LPG X RATIO OF SUBSTITUTION OF LPG FROM KEROSENE

• Energyconversionfromkerosenetobiogas:

ACTIVITY DATA = VOLUME OF BIOGAS DIGESTER X RATIO OF SUBSTITUTION OF BIOGAS FROM KEROSENE X DIGESTER EFFICIENCY (it is assumed that the digesters are fixed dome with 30% efficiency value)

• Energyconversionfromdieselfueltobiodiesel:

ACTIVITY DATA = VOLUME OF BIODIESEL USED X RATIO OF SUBSTITUTION OF BIODIESEL FROM DIESEL FUEL



• EnergyefficiencyfromCFLlampuse: ACTIVITY DATA = NUMBER OF UNITS X ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER UNIT X

CFL LAMP’S ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION FACTOR

(Difference in efficiency of 1-star lamp with 4-star lamp is 20%).

• EnergyefficiencyfromLEDlampuseforPublicStreetLighting:

ACTIVITY DATA =NUMBER OF UNIT X ENERGY CONSUMPTION PER UNIT X ENERGY CONSUMPTION REDUCTION FACTOR OF PJU LED LAMP

(energy consumption reduction factor by LED lamps against conventional PJU lamp is 33%)

5. Emission factor column contains constant to multiply activity data with emission reduction.

Emission factors for mitigation activities should refer to the following values:

Fuel Type EmissionFactor

Solar (diesel fuel) 2,2 kg CO2/liter of solar*Premium (fuel oil) 2,6 kg CO2 /liter of premium*Kerosene 2,58 kg CO2 /liter of mitan**LPG 2,98 kg/kg LPG**Firewood 1,75kgCO2/kgoffirewood**

Electricity System Emission Factor (kgCO2/kWh)

Java – Madura – Bali Interconnection system 0,741Sumatera Interconnection system 0,748Khatulistiwa Interconnection System (West Kalimantan System) 0,748Barito Interconnection System (South and Central Kalimantan) 1,003Mahakan Interconnection System (East Kalimantan System) 0,820Minahasa - Kotamobagu Interconnection 0,319South Sulawesi – West Sulawesi Interconnection System 0.601Batam Interconnection System 0,568Maluku, Nusa Tenggara and Papua 0,800Diesel Power Plant (PLTD) 0,800

Source: DirGen for Electricity, 2012

Source: * Calculation result of IPCC Guidelines 2006 and Pertamina, 2006** BIRU program research result

In Emission Calculation Form for Energy Sector, the emission factor will show automatically if the column for province name is filled.

For Mitigation Action Plans related to fuel substitution, the following emission factor is used:

6. Emission reduction column shows the amount of emission reduction from a mitigation action = activity data x emission factor

2 Based on GIZ PAKLIM , Substitution of Conventional Street Lights with LEDs (2012).


1 1 2

Tech

nica

l Gui

danc

e (B

IMTE

K) R

enew

able

Ne

w E

nerg

y (E

BT)

Prov

ision

of r

egul

atio

n on

geo

ther

mal

and

gr

ound

wat

er

23

4a4b

5a6a

5c7a

5b6b

5d7b

Code

RAD

LPJ

Prog

ram

/Act

ivity

RAD

LPJ

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

RAD

RAD

Unit

Unit

LPJ

LPJ

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Loca

tion

(3)

Targ

et (4

)

RAD

LPJ

Budg

et a

lloca

tion

plan

(m

illio

n ru

piah

)Bu

dget

use

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

FORM

3.1

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for E

nerg

y Se

ctor

SEC

TOR

: EN

ERG

Y

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



8a8b

8c9b

11b

8d8e

9a11

a12

APBN

APBD

-PAP

BD-K

Priv

ate

Sect

or Fu

ndEn

dLP

JPH

LNSt

art

RAD

Fina

ncin

g So

urce

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

RAD

Impl

emen

tatio

nRe

alize

d Ac

tiviti

es

(%)

10

Activ

ity Im

plem

ente

r

Core

Act

ivity

supp

orte

d

FORM

3.1

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for E

nerg

y Se

ctor

(Con

tinu

ed)

SEC

TOR

: EN

ERG

Y

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


3.2 TRANSPORTATION SECTOR

3.2.1 Core Activity Form for Transportation Sector

The Core Activity Form for transportation section is intended to monitor and evaluate each mitigation action categorized as core mitigation action and which generate GHG emission reduction directly. The form is filled out by the Central Government/ Provincial/District/City Governments based on their respective authorities.

For Core activities of Transportation Sector, the mitigation actions can be grouped in general and defined as follows:

(1) Avoid; The avoid strategy is conducted by reducing demand trip, especially urban

trip (trip demand management) through land use management, reducing unnecessary trip and trip distance. Mitigation actions included in the strategy is the application of traffic impact control through Traffic Impact Analysis (Andalalin);

(2) Shift; The shift strategy is conducted by shifting from private vehicle (transportation

mode with high energy consumption) to low carbon transportation such as non-motorized means of transportation, public transports, and water transports. The mitigation actions included in this strategy are:a. Development of Intelligent Transport Systemb. Reformed transit system – BRT System c. Rejuvenation of public transport fleetsd. Construction of facilities for pedestrians (pedestrians’ walk) and cyclists

(bicycle lanes)e. Motorized vehicle-free day (car free day)f. Congestion charging and road pricing refer to Government Regulation (PP)

32/2011 on Traffic Management and Engineering, Analysis of Traffic Impacts and Traffic Need Management

g. Parking management application

(3) Improve; The Improve strategy is conducted by improving energy efficiency and carbon

emission reduction on motorized vehicles of the means of transportation. The mitigation actions included in this category are:a. Emission testing on all vehiclesb. Smart driving training (eco-driving).



Data needs to be filled out by users

Constant (users do not need to fill out; data is provided or determined)

Calculation result ( will calculate automatically. Users do not need to fill out)

Yellow

Red

Green

This technical guideline for GHG emission reduction calculation (especially for Transportation Sector) has gone through contionuous improvement process which eventually decides that mitigation actions of: constructing pedestrian’s facility (pedestrian walk) and cyclists’ facility (bicycle lanes), congestion charging and road pricing and emission testing on all vehicles are temporarily not included in the Technical Guideline. But this does not exclude any possibilities for the cities that have implemented the three mitigation actions to carry on the implementation because the Technical Guideline will continue to be developed further.

3.2.2 GHG Emission Calculation Form for Transportation Sector

For calculation of GHG emission reduction from each mitigation action in the transportation sector, there are additional forms that contain indicators, parameters, activity data as well as needed emission factors.

In the transportation sector, each mitigation action has additional forms containing data necessary for emission reduction calculation. The following is the general instruction to fill out GHG Emission Reduction Form of transportation sector.

• Calculationtableisdevelopedbyusingthreedifferentcolorswiththefollowingexplanation:

• Typesofvehiclesusedincalculationtablearearrangedbasedontheclassificationset by the BPS

- Passengers’ cars - Motorcycles - Buses - Trucks

• Datawhichistheconstantisfuelefficiency,theamountofvehicles’emissioninurban area (BAU) and emission factor.


Amount of Urban Vehicles’ Emission (BAU) comes from the calculation from each city/ province.

Average Fuel Consumption per Day shows average amount of fuel used by each type of vehicle for each travelled kilometer.

Fuel efficiency is relations between speed and fuel consumption for every kilometer. The function of the constant constitutes the assessment result done by JICA’s 2004 SITRAMP project.

Picture 1. Fuel consumption of each vehicle per kilometersource: sitramp, 2004.

The fuel efficiency value based on the types of vehicles and the constant in Picture 1 can be seen in the table below.

Type of vehicle Function of Constant

PC (private car) y = 7E-05x2 - 0,0077x + 0,2579MC (motorcycle) y = 1E-05x2 - 0,0009x + 0,0601SB (small bus) y = 3E-05x2 - 0,0029x + 0,1285MB (medium bus) y = 5E-05x2 - 0,0056x + 0,2961Patas-AC, LB (large bus) y = 3E-05x2 - 0,0029x + 0,1533S/MT (small/medium truck) y = 5E-05x2 - 0,0053x + 0,2771LT (large truck) y = 5E-05x2 - 0,006x + 0,3147

Type of vihicle Average Fuel Consumption per Day (Litre/Km)

Passengers’Car 0,13Motorcycle 0,05Small Busses/Van 0,13Medium Bus 0,18Big Bus 0,33

Source: Urban Transportation System Development



GHG emission factor or removals shows the amount of emission/removal per unit of activity done. Emission factor used is the one issued by PERTAMINA (2006) based on carbon content in fuel type.

Fuel Emission Factor

Petrol 2,6 kg CO2/litreDiesel Fuel 2,2 kg CO2/litre

3.2.3 Supporting Activity Form for Transportation Sector

The Supporting Activity Form for Transportation Sector is used to monitor and evaluate each mitigation action included in the supporting activity category, namely any activity predicted to generate GHG emission reduction indirectly. This form is filled out by the Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ City/District Governments based on their respective authorities.


1 1 2

23

4a4b

5a6a

8b5c

7a8d

5b6b

8c5d

8a7b

8e

Code

RAD

LPJ

Prog

ram

/Act

ivity

RAD

LPJ

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

RAD

APBD

-PRA

DPH

LNUn

itUn

itAP

BNLP

JAP

BD-K

LPJ

Priv

ate

Sect

or

Fund

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Loca

tion

(3)

Targ

et (4

)

RAD

LPJ

Budg

et

allo

catio

n pl

an(m

illio

n ru

piah

)

Budg

et

allo

catio

n pl

an(m

illio

n ru

piah

)

Fina

ncin

g So

urce

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

FORM

3.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Sect

or

SEC

TOR

: TR

AN

SPO

RTAT

ION

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



9b11

b9a

11a

1516

1314

12

End

LPJ

Star

tRA

D

RAD

Impl

emen

tatio

nRe

alize

d Ac

tivity

(%)

10

Activ

ity Im

plem

ente

r

BAU

Emiss

ion

(tC

O2e

)

Actu

al E

miss

ion

Redu

ctio

n (tC

O2e

)

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n Ta

rget

(tCO

2e)

Co-B

enefi

tRe

mar

ks

FORM

3.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Sect

or (C

onti

nued

)

SEC

TOR

: TR

AN

SPO

RTAT

ION

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



The filling in of the form is conducted as follows:


2. Column 2 is filled with the title of each mitigation action done (based on the authorities of each governmental level).

3. Column 3 is filled with the title of Program/Actvity based on LPJ related to the mitigation action in column 2.

4. Column 4 is filled with the location of the core mitigation action.

5. Column 5 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation in RAD-GRK and in LPJ, and the unit of the quantity.

6. Column 6 is filled with budget allocation plan to carry out each mitigation action in the reporting year.

7. Column 7 is filled with budget use in the reporting year.

8. Column 8 is filled with financing source of mitigation action (APBN, Provincial APBD, District/City APBD, PHLN, Private sector fund).

9. Column 9 is filled with the implementation period of core mitigation action based on RAD-GRK.

10. Column 10 is filled with realization of mitigation action target based on RAD-GRK.

11. Column 11 is filled with the mitigation action implementing institution.

12. Column 12 is filled with total level of BAU Baseline GHG Emission pursuant to what is mentioned in the annex of Presidential Regulation (Perpres) 61/2011 and RAD-GRK document. If not possible, it should be filled with BAU Baseline by sector.

13. Column 13 is filled with GHG emission reduction target generated from each mitigation action (pursuant to what is mentioned in Presidential Regulation (Perpres) 61/2011 and RAD-GRK document).

14. Column 14 is filled with GHG emission reduction from the implementation of each mitigation action.

15. Column 15 is filled with information on co-benefit resulted by the mitigation action.

16. Column 16 is filled with other information or remarks deemed necessary to convey.



3.2.4 EMISSION CALCULATION FORM FOR TRANSPORTATION SECTOR

1. ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems)

ITS is the technological use and its adjustment to engineering system concept in order to develop and improve all types of transportation systems. The GHG Reduction Calculation Form for the mitigation action below includes all parameters used and being within the corridor context where the ITS program is applied..

* Table on GHG emission reduction calculation form can be multiplied according to the number of ITS application locations.

** 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by cities that have not developed BaU properly yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor that was previously used.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN ITS MITIGATION ACTION DATA - Column 1, contains data on vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with fuel type pursuant to the vehicle type (Petrol/Diesel Fuel).- Column 3 (P1), is filled with the average number of vehicles passing through ITS

application lane (unit/hour).- Column 4 (P2), contains the average number of operating days per year, namely

300 days.- Column 5 (P3), is filled with the average number of trips per day.- Column 6 (P4), is filled with the length of ITS application corridor (km).- Column 7 (P5), is filled with the average vehicle speed before ITS application (km/

hour).- Column 8 (P6), is filled with the average vehicle speed after ITS application (km/

hour).


- Column 9 (P7), contains information on the average fuel consumption before ITS application based on vehicle speed and refers to Picture 1, Fuel Consumption of Each Vehicle per Kilometer (Liter/km). The column will be filled out automatically.

- Column 10 (P8), contains information on the average fuel consumption after ITS application based on vehicle speed and refers to Picture 1, Fuel Consumption of Each Vehicle per Kilometer (Liter/km). The column will be filled out automatically.

- Column 11 (P9), contains Emission Factor that shows the amount of CO2 emission according to the fuel type used (kgCO2/liter). The column will be filled out automatically if Column 2 has been completed.

- Column 12 (P10), contains total trip per year (Km). The column will be filled out automatically.

TOTAL TRIP PER YEAR (KM) = P1 X P2 X P3 X P4

- Column 13 (P11), contains CO2 emission per year before ITS application (TCO2e). The column will be filled out automatically.

CO2 EMISSION PER YEAR BEFORE APPLICATION = [P7 X P9 X P10]/1000 (TCO2e)

- Column 14 (P12), contains CO2 emission per year after ITS application (TCO2e). The column will be filled out automatically.

CO2 EMISSION PER YEAR AFTER APPLICATION = [P8 X P9 X P10]/1000 (TCO2e)

- Column 15, contains total CO2 emission reduction per year (TCO2e). The column will be filled out automatically.

EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = P11 – P12



2. MitigationActionofTrafficImpactControl Application (Andalalin)

Andalalin is an activity conducted to analyze traffic impacts caused by constructions of activity centers, settlement and other facilities which potentially bring about generation. The activity should be done before the constructions so that it can keep traffic condition safe, in order and running smoothly. However, Andalalin mitigation action aims to calculate reduced CO2 from the Andalalin application. Without Andalalin application, traffic congestion and disorder will result in the increase in CO2 emission from vehicle’s fuel combustion. The table in the GHG emission reduction calculation form can be multiplied according to the number of Andalalin application locations. The GHG emission reduction calculation form for Andalalin application’s mitigation action is as follows:

* The following table can be multiplied according to the number of Andalalin application zones (in reference to the exisiting Andalalin document)

** 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly

yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON MITIGATION ACTION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT CONTROL APPLICATION (ANDALALIN)- Column 1, is filled with the vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with the fuel type according to the vehicle type.


- Column 3 (P1), is filled with the number of vehicles in the city in the counting year (unit/year).

- Column 4 (P2), contains assumptions of the reduced number of vehicles after Andalalin application, namely at 10%.

- Column 5 (P3), contains assumptions of road network proportion impacted by Andalalin application, namely at 10 %.

- Column 6 (P4), is filled with the average number of operating days per year (day).

- Column 7 (P5), is filled with the average number of trip per day (trip).- Column 8 (P6), is filled with the average trip length per day (km/trip).- Column 9 (P7), contains the average set number of fuel consumption per day

(liter/km).- Column 10 (P8), contains fuel consumption per year (liter). This column will be

filled out automatically.

FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR (LITER) = P1 X P4 X P5 X P6 X P7


- Column 12, contains Emission Reduction. The column will be filled out automatically.

EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = [(P2/100) X( P3/100) X P8 X P9] /1000

3. Mitigation Action of Parking Management

Parking Management is a policy that can take a role as a push factor that forces mode shifting to public transports and potentially change private vehicle use into mass public transport use patterns and improve traffic smoothing especially in city centers. The GHG emission reduction calculation form for parking management mitigation action is as follows.



* 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON PARKING MANAGEMENT MITIGATION ACTION- Column 1, is filled with the vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with the fuel type, namely petrol or diesel fuel. - Column 3 (P1), is filled with the availability of off-street parking space (parking

space unit).- column 4 (P2), is filled with the availability of on-street parking space (parking

space unit).- Column 5 (P3), is filled with the average number of vehicles do off street parking

per day before parking management application (unit)- Column 6 (P4), is filled with the average number of vehicles do off street parking

per day after parking management application (unit).- Column 7 (P5), is filled with the average number of vehicles do on street parking

per day before parking management application (unit).- Column 8 (P6), is filled with the average number of vehicles do on street parking

per day after parking management application (unit).- Column 9 (P7), contains the average number of operating days per year, namely

300 days.- Column 10 (P8), is filled with the average number of trips per day (trip).- Column 11 (P9), is filled with the average trip length per day (km/trip).- Column 12 (P10), contains the average set number of fuel consumption per day

(liter/km).- Column 13 (P11), contains off street fuel consumption per year before parking

management application (liter). The column will be filled out automatically.

OFF STREET FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR BEFORE APPLICATION = P1 X P3 X P7 X P8 X P9 X P10 (LITER)

- Column 14 (P12), contains off street fuel consumption per year after parking management application (liter). The column will be filled out automatically.

OFF STREET FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR AFTER APPLICATION = P1 X P4 X P7 X P8 X P9 X P10 (LITER)


- Column 15 (P13), contains on street fuel consumption per year before parking management application (liter). The column will be filled out automatically.

ON STREET FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR BEFORE APPLICATION = P2 X P5 X P7 X P8 X P9 X P10 (LITER)

- Column 16 (P14), contains on street fuel consumption per year after parking management application (liter). The column will be filled out automatically.

ON STREET FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR AFTER APPLICATION = P2 X P6 X P7 X P8 X P9 X P10 (LITER)

- Column 17 (P15), contains Emission Factor that shows amount of CO2 emission according to the fuel type used (kgCO2/liter). The column will be filled out automatically if Column 2 has been completed.

- Column 18 (P16), contains off street emission per year. The column will be filled out automatically.

OFF STREET EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = [(P11-P12) X P15] /1000

- Column 19 (P17), contains on street emission per year. The column will be filled out automatically.

ON STREET EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = [(P13-P14) X P15] /1000

- Column 20, contains total emission reduction per year. This column will be filled out automatically.

TOTAL EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = P16+P17

4. Mitigation Action of Reformed Transit System – BRT System

Transit System is part of urban mass transports and is one of the transitional phases towards Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). The mitigation action aims to calculate CO2 emission reduction resulted from transport pattern change from private vehicles to mass public transports, in this case namely shifting to Transit System. The table on GHG emission reduction calculation form can be multiplied according to the number of corridors of Transit System- BRT System application. The GHG reduction calculation form for mitigation action of reformed transit system- BRT System is as follows:



* Table on GHG emission reduction calculation form can be multiplied according to the number of Transit System- BRT System application locations.

** 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

*** Non-Bus Public Transports such as Water Bus, Bentor, Bajaj (if data is available).

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON MITIGATION ACTION OF REFORMED TRANSIT SYSTEM –BRT SYSTEM- Column 1 (P1), is filled with the number of transit system buses (unit).- Column 2 (P2), is filled with bus capacity (passengers).- Column 3 (P3), is filled with bus’ operations per day (return).- Column 4, contains type of private vehicle, namely car or motorcycle.- Column 5, contains the fuel type generally used by car and motorcycle, namely

petrol.- Column 6 (P4), is filled with modal shift (%). Modal Shift is obtained from direct survey result with respondents from users of

private vehicles, public transports and/or transit system buses.- Column 6A (P5), is filled with level of occupancy from each vehicle category. The

value is obtained from survey


- Column 7 (P6), contains number of private vehicles shifting to public transports (unit).

NUMBER OF PRIVATE VEHICLES SHIFTING TO PUBLIC TRANSPORTS = (P1 X P2 X P3 X (P4/100))/P5

- Column 8 (P7), contains with average set number of operating days per year namely 300 days.

- Column 9 (P8), is filled with average trip per day (trip).- Column 10 (P9), is filled with average trip length per day (km/trip).- Column 11 (P10), contains average set number of fuel consumption per day

(liter/km).- Column 12 (P11), contains fuel consumption per year (liter). The column will be

filled out automatically.

FUEL CONSUMPTION PER YEAR (LITER) = P6 X P7 X P8 X P9 X P10

- Column 13 (P12), contains Emission Factor that shows the amount of CO2 emission according to fuel type used (kgCO2/liter). The column will be filled out automatically if Column 2 has been completed.

- Column 14 (P13), contains Emission reduction from shifting of motorized vehicles to BRT. The column will be filled out automatically.

EMISSION REDUCTION FROM SHIFTING OF MOTORIZED VEHICLES TO BRT (TCO2e) = [P1 X P3 X (P11/P4) X P12] /1000

- Column 15 (P14), contain BRT corridor’s length.- Column 16, contains fuel type used by BRT- Column 17 (P15), contains the economy of BRT’s filled fuel based on the

constant.- Column 18 (P16), contains total fuel consumption of operating BRT. The column

will be filled out automatically

TOTAL FUEL CONSUMPTION OF BRT (LITER) = (P1 X P3 X P7 X P14) X P15

- Column 19 (P17), contains emission factor (kg/L), constitutes the constant- Column 20 (P18), contains total CO2 from operational BRT. The column will be

filled out automatically

TOTAL CO2 OF OPERATIONAL BRT (TCO2) = (P16 X P17)/1000



- Column 21 (P19), contains total CO2 reduction from BRT system. The column will be filled out automatically.

TOTAL CO2 REDUCTION FROM BRT SYSTEM (TCO2) = (P13 – P18)

5. Mitigation Action of Public Transport Fleet Rejuvenation

Rejuvenation of Public Transport Fleet aims to replace old and unfit-to-operate public transports with new vehicles and same operating routes with the replacement. The GHG reduction calculation form for mitigation action of public transport fleet rejuvenation is as follows:

* Data can be obtained from Operators and/or Organda (local transportation organization)** 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly

yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON MITIGATION ACTION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT FLEET REJUVENATION- Column 1, is filled with the vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with the fuel type used (petrol/diesel fuel)- Column 3 (P1), is filled with the number of public transports rejuvenated (unit/

year). Number of public transport units can be obtained from District or City

Transportation Agency. - Column 4 (P2), is filled with bus’s operations per day (return).- Column 5 (P3), filled with average length of trip per day (km/trip).- Column 6 (P4), contains average operating days per year, that is, 300 days.- Column 7 (P5), is filled with fuel consumption (liter/km) per year before

rejuvenation.


- Column 8 (P6), is filled with fuel consumption (liter/km) per year after rejuvenation.

Fuel consumption data (liter/km) for public transports can be obtained from local Organda or public transport’s operator.

- Column 9 (P7), contains fuel consumption (liter).

FUEL CONSUMPTION REDUCTION (LITER) = P1 X P2 X P3 X P4 X (P5 - P6)


- Column 11, contains Emission Reduction. The column will be filled out automatically.

EMISSION REDUCTION (TCO2e) = (P7 X P8)/1000

6. Mitigation Action of Motorized Vehicle Free Day (Car Free Day)

Car Free Day refers to activity that aims to reduce the number of vehicles on the set lanes and particular time. The GHG emission calculation form for mitigation action of motorized vehicle free day (Car Free Day) is as follows.



* 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON MITIGATION ACTION OF MOTORIZED VEHICLE FREE DAY (CAR FREE DAY)- Column 1, is filled with the vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with the fuel type.- Column 3 (P1), is filled with the average number of vehicles passing through

car-free day application lanes (unit/day).- Column 4 (P2), is filled with duration of car-free day implementation per day

(hour).- Column 5 (P3), is filled with the duration of car-free day implementation per

year (day).- Column 6 (P4), contains the average number of operating days per year, namely

300 days.- Column 7 (P5), is filled with the average number of trips per day (trip).- Column 8 (P6), is filled with the average trip length per day (km/trip).- Column 9 (P7), is filled with the average fuel consumption (liter/km) The average fuel consumption is obtained from the Organda or manual book

from vehicle’s dealer- Column 10 (P8), contains fuel consumption (liter)

FUEL CONSUMPTION (LITER) = P1 X [(P2 X P3)/24] X P4 X P5 X P6 X P7

- Column 11 (P9), contains Emission Factors that shows the amount of CO2 emission according to the fuel type used (kgCO2/liter). The column will be filled out automatically if Column 2 has been completed.



7. Smart Driving Mitigation Action(Eco- Driving)

Smart driving (eco-driving) aims to provide training on energy-efficient, environmentally-friendly, safe and comfortable driving behaviours to reach the most efficient fuel consumption. The GHG calculation form for smart driving mitigation action (eco-driving) is as follows:


* Driving Method Application will potentially save fuel ranging between 10%-40% and reduce vehicle’s exhaust emission gas up to 20% (BSTP study, 2009)

** 2006 Pertamina Emission Factor is used by the cities that have not developed BaU properly yet; the cities that have developed BaU can use the Emission Factor used previously.

INSTRUCTION TO FILL IN DATA ON SMART DRIVING MITIGATION ACTION (ECO- DRIVING)- Column 1, is filled with the vehicle type.- Column 2, is filled with the fuel type (petrol/diesel fuel).- Column 3 (P1), is filled with the number of smart driving/eco driving training

participants (person/year).- Column 4 (P2), contains the average number of operating days per year, namely

300 days.- Column 5 (P3), is filled with the average trip per day (Trip).- Column 6 (P4), is filled with the transport’s operations per day (Return).- Column 7 (P5), contains data on average fuel consumption per day (liter/km). The average fuel consumption is obtained from Organda or operator or manual

book from vehicle’s dealer- Column 8 (P6), contains potential emission reduction (%). Driving Method Application will potentially save fuel ranging between 10%-

40% and reduce vehicle’s exhaust emission gas up to 20% (BSTP study, 2009)- Column 9 (P7), contains fuel consumption data (liter)

FUEL CONSUMPTION (LITER) = P1 X P2 X P3 X P4 X P5 X P6






1 1 2

Spee

d lim

it on

toll

road

Tree

pla

ntin

g

23

4a4b

5a6a

5c7a

5b6b

5d7b

Code

RAD

LPJ

Prog

ram

/Act

ivity

RAD

LPJ

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

RAD

RAD

Unit

Unit

LPJ

LPJ

Miti

gatio

n Ac

tion

Loca

tion

(3)

Targ

et (4

)

RAD

LPJ

Budg

et a

lloca

tion

plan

(m

illio

n ru

piah

)Bu

dget

use

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

FORM

3.2

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for T

rans

port

atio

n Se

ctor

SEC

TOR

: TR

AN

SPO

RTAT

ION

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


8a8b

8c9b

11b

8d8e

9a11

a12

APBN

APBD

-PAP

BD-K

Priv

ate

Sect

or Fu

ndEn

dLP

JPH

LNSt

art

RAD

Fina

ncin

g So

urce

(mill

ion

rupi

ah)

RAD

Impl

emen

tatio

nRe

alize

d Ac

tivity

(%)

10

Activ

ity Im

plem

ente

r

Core

Act

ivity

supp

orte

d

FORM

3.2

.3 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for T

rans

port

atio

n Se

ctor

(Con

tinu

atio

n)

SEC

TOR

: TR

AN

SPO

RTAT

ION

CATA

GO

RY

:

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




The form should be filled in with the following step:

i. Column 1 is filled with the number of each mitigation action.

ii. Column 2 is filled with the title of each mitigation action done (based on the authorities of each governmental level).

iii. Column 3 is filled with the title of Program/Actvity based on LPJ related to the mitigation action in column 2.

iv. Column 4 is filled with the location of supporting mitigation action.

v. Column 5 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation in RAD-GRK and in LPJ, and the unit of the quantity.

vi. Column 6 is filled with budget allocation plan to carry out each mitigation action in the reporting year.

vii. Column 7 is filled with budget use in the reporting year.

viii. Column 8 is filled with financing source of mitigation action (APBN, Provincial APBD, District/District APBD, PHLN, Private sector fund).

ix. Column 9 is filled with the implementation period of supporting mitigation action based on RAD-GRK.

x. Column 10 is filled with realization of the achievement of supporting mitigation action target, based on RAD-GRK.

xi. Column 11 is filled with the mitigation action implementing institution.

xii. Column 12 is filled with relevant core activity which is supported.




Reporting implementation is conducted by filling in MER forms presented in this Chapter. For filling in the forms, it is absolutely necessary to have the newest document of Accountability Report (LPJ) on provincial/city/district APBD (local government budget). The LPJ is absolutely required to identify activities at the provincial/city/district levels. Without the LPJ, the completed activities cannot be identified, so that it is not possible to fill in the Reporting forms.

MER Implementation of the waste management sector GHG mitigation actions consists of two parts: (1) domestic solid waste sub-sector, and (2) domestic liquid waste sub-sector. Mitigation actions in each sector can be classified into: 1) Core activity Group, namely activities with directly impact on GHG emission

reduction, and2) Supporting Activity Group, namely activities with indirect impact on emission

reduction; however this group serves as constitutes important element for successful implementation of core activities in the waste management sector emission reduction efforts.

4.1 DOMESTIC SOLID WASTE SUB-SECTOR

Based on the RAN and RAD-GRK documents, domestic solid waste sub-sector core activities are generally grouped into two:(1) Improvement in landfill facilities;(2) 3 R activity implementation (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle)

CHAPTER 4TECHNICAL GUIDELINEFOR WASTE MANAGEMENT SECTOR


Meanwhile, the supporting mitigation activities of domestic solid waste subsector, based on RAN and RAD-GRK can be categorized into three: (1) Institutional and regulation development, (2) Human resources capacity development, and (3) Incentive and disincentive system development.

Besides MER forms for Core activities and Supporting Activities there are GHG Inventory Forms that function as additional forms for supporting GHG inventory in the waste sector. The indicators used in the GHG inventory forms of domestic waste sub-sector include:- Number of population, population composition based on income, produced

waste, waste composition, waste management method and facilities;- Daily garbage piles produced in each district/city and annual garbage piles;- Composition and contents of garbage dry materials in each district/city areas

take the form of food garbage, paper, diapers, wood, park garbage, textile products, rubber, plastic, metal, glass and other types of garbage.

- Quantity of garbage treated with various methods: garbage transported to Landfill (TPA), composted garbage, recycled garbage, burned garbage and unmanaged garbage (dumped in any place);

- Information on the number and type of Landfills (TPA) in district/city consisting of Unmanaged Shallow (US), Unmanaged Deep (UD), Managed Anaerobic (MA), and Managed Semi Aerobic (MS).

Notes on Landfill (TPA) types based on the 2006 IPCC GL, namely:a) US = Un-managed Shallow = the height of garbage pile in TPA is less than 5

meters and deep ground water surface.b) UN = Un-managed Deep = the height of garbage pile in TPA is more than 5

meters or shallow ground water surface.c) MA = Anaerobic – Managed TPA = There is arrangement of pile location, at

least has one of the following (a) covering layer, (b) mechanic compaction, (c) garbage pile height limit.

d) MS = Semi-aerobic TPA = there is pile location arrangement, has structures that enable air to pass through garbage pile, namely (a) permeable covering layer, (b) leaching system, (c) regulating pond age and (d) gas ventilation system.

- Number of 3R facilities and composting facilities available in district/city.

Inventory conducted at the District/City level will then be compiled at the Provincial and National Levels by using different Inventory Forms.



18

29

511

143

106

154

137

1216

No.

Title

of M

itiga

tion

Actio

n/ C

ore

Activ

ityLo

catio

nBu

dget

allo

catio

n in

RAD

-GRK

(rupi

ah)

Impl

emen

ter

Budg

et u

se b

ased

on

Sour

ces (

Rupi

ah)

Targ

et

RAD

-GRK

RAD

-GRK

RAD

-GRK

APBN

City

/ Di

stric

t AP

BDQ

uant

ityQ

uant

ityLP

JLP

J

LPJ

Prov

inci

al

APBD

PH

LNPr

ivat

eSe

ctor

Fund

Unit

Unit

FORM

4.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Dom

esti

c So

lid W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


1722

1819

2324

2120

Key

perfo

rman

ce

indi

cato

r

Co-B

enefi

tSu

ppor

ting

Info

rmat

ion

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n(to

n CO

2e)

Qua

ntity

Det

ails

BAU

Base

line

GHG

Emiss

ions

(ton

CO2e

)Un

it

GHG

Emiss

ions

with

M

itiga

tion

Actio

n(to

n CO

2e)

FORM

4.1

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Dom

esti

c So

lid W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor (

Cont

inua

tion

)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




This core activity form is used for monitoring and evaluating each mitigation action categorized as core activities that produce GHG emission reduction directly. The form is filled by The Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments twice a year based on their respective authorities. The form should be filled in with the following step:


2. Column 2 is filled with the title of each of the completed mitigation actions/ activities in provincial RAD-GRK document.

3. Column 3 is filled with the title of each of the completed mitigation actions/ activities in the LPJ of provincial/ city-district local budget (APBD).

4. Column 4 is filled with location of mitigation action/activity in RAD-GRK document.

5. Column 5 is filled with location of mitigation action/activity in LPJ document.

6. Column 6 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation in RAD-GRK.

7. Column 7 is filled with the unit of the quantity of targeted implementation, corresponding column no.6.

8. Column 8 is filled with the quantity of targeted implementation in LPJ.


10. Column 10 is filled with budget allocation in RAD-GRK to carry out the mitigation activities.

11. Column 11 is filled with activity implementing institutions.

12. Column 12 is filled with budget use with the State Budget (APBN) fund source.

13. Column 13 is filled with budget use with Provincial Local Government Budget (APBD) fund source.

14. Column 14 is filled with budget use with District/City Local Government Budget (APBD) fund source.

15. Column 15 is filled with budget use from Foreign Grant and Loan (PHLN) fund source.

16. Column 16 is filled with budget use from Private fund source.

17. Column 17 is filled with key performance indicator explanation on each mitigation action.

18. Column 18 is filled with the quantity of key performance indicator on each mitigation action.

19. Column 19 is filled with Unit of Key performance indicator on each mitigation action.

20. Column 20 is filled with GHG emission reduction produced from each mitigation action.


21. Column 21 is filled with BAU baseline emission status for waste sector in the reporting year. See provincial RAD-GRK document to get this data.

22. Column 22 is filled with estimated GHG emission for waste sector in the reporting year, if mitigation actions are implemented. The 2006 IPCC GL Spreadsheet is used in conducting estimation of GHG emission reduction from outcome/IKK (key performance indicator) of each completed activity.

23. Column 23 is filled with information on co-benefits resulted by mitigation action.

24. Column 24 is filled with other various information deemed necessary to convey as related to mitigation action implementation.



16

82

79

311

104

5

No.

Title

of S

uppo

rtin

g M

itiga

tion

Actio

n/Ac

tivity

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

in R

AD-G

RK (r

upia

h)Im

plem

ente

r

Targ

et

RAD

-GRK

Loca

tion

RAD

-GRK

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

LPJ

RAD

-GRK

LPJ

LPJ

Unit

Unit

FORM

4.1

.2 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


1415

1312

16

Budg

et U

se B

ased

on

Sour

ce

(Rup

iah)

APBN

City

/Dist

rict

APBD

Prov

inci

al

APBD

PHLN

Priv

ate

Sect

or Fu

nd

1718

1920

Key

Perfo

rman

ce

Indi

cato

rSu

ppor

ting

Info

rmat

ion

Qua

ntity

Det

ails

Unit

FORM

4.1

.2 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




This supporting activity form is used for monitoring and evaluating each mitigation action categorized as supporting activities that produce GHG emission reduction directly. The form is filled by The Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments twice a year based on their respective authorities. The form should be filled in with the following step:

1. Column 1 is filled with a number



4. Column 4 is filled with location of mitigation action in RAD-GRK document.

5. Column 5 is filled with location of mitigation action in LPJ document.





10. Column 10 is filled with budget allocation in RAD-GRK to carry out the mitigation actions.





15. Column 15 is filled with budget use with Foreign Grant and Loan (PHLN) fund source.

16. Column 16 is filled with budget use from private sector fund source.

17. Column 17 is filled with Key performance indicator explanation on each mitigation action.


19. Column 19 is filled with the unit of key performance indicator on each mitigation action.



12

610

48

123

711

59

1314

Num

ber o

f Pop

ulat

ion

(peo

ple)

Garb

age

Pile

kg/p

erso

n/da

yDi

aper

Rube

rFo

od W

aste

Park

Ga

rbag

eM

etal

Gg/y

ear

Woo

dPl

astic

Pape

rTe

xtile

Glas

sO

ther

Garb

age

Com

posit

ion

(%)

FORM

4.1

.3 D

istr

ict/

City

GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:



1815

2226

2017

2428

1916

2327

2125

2930

Dry

Mat

eria

l Con

tent

s of D

omes

tic S

oild

Was

te (%

)

Food

Was

teDi

aper

Rube

rD

umpe

d to

La

ndfil

l/T

PA

Park

Garb

age

Met

alRe

cycl

edPa

per

Woo

dPl

astic

Com

post

edTe

xtile

Glas

sBu

rned

Oth

erUn

man

aged

Garb

age

Man

agem

ent D

istrib

utio

n (%

)

FORM

4.1

.3 D

istr

ict/

City

GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


3331

3741

3532

3934

3836

40

Garb

age

Man

agem

ent F

acili

ty

Nam

e of

La

ndfil

l(T

PA)

m3/

day

MA

USQ

uant

ity(U

nit)

Qua

ntity

(Uni

t)To

nM

SUD

Land

fill (

TPA)

Di

strib

utio

n ba

sed

on

Type

(%)

Tota

l M

anag

emen

t Ca

paci

ty

(ton/

year

)

Aver

age

garb

age

volu

me

to L

andfi

ll (T

PA)

3R Fa

cilit

yCo

mpo

stin

g Fa

cilit

yLa

ndfil

l (TP

A) D

istrib

utio

n ba

sed

on Ty

pe (%

)

FORM

4.1

.3 D

istr

ict/

City

GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




This District/City Indicator Form for domestic solid waste sub-sector is earmarked for monitoring and evaluating indicators related to GHG emission from domestic solid waste at the District/City level each year. The form is filled by The District/City Governments under supervision of Provincial Governments. The form should be filled in with the following step:

1. Column 1 is filled with the population number in each District/City every year. The number of population can use the data from local BPS (Local Bureau of Statistics).

2. Columns 2 and 3 are filled with garbage pile average daily produced in each district/ city as well as yearly garbage pile. Ideally, the number is obtained from surveys in each district/city areas, but if it is not available average data in related province can be used.

3. Columns 4 through 14 are filled with waste composition in each district/city areas like food waste, paper, diapers, wood, park garbage, textile products, rubber, plastic, metal, glass and other.

4. Columns 15 through 25 are filled with garbage dry material content in each district/city area such as garbage, food waste, paper, diaper, wood, park garbage, textile product, rubber, plastic, metal, glass, etc.

5. Ideally, composition number and dry material contents are obtained from surveys done in each district/city. But in the initial phase average number in related provinces can be used.

6. Columns 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 are filled with the number of garbage managed by various methods such as garbage transported to Landfill (TPA), garbage that is composted, garbage that is recycled, garbage that is burned as well as garbage that is not managed yet (dumped in any place).

7. Columns 31, 32, 33 are filled with information on name and average volume of garbage entering Landfill (TPA) in district/city.

8. Columns 34, 35, 36, and 37 are filled with information on the number of Landfills in district/city whose type consists from Unmanaged Shallow (US), Unmanaged Deep (UD), Managed Anaerobic (MA) and Managed Semi Aerobic (MS).

9. Columns 38 and 39 are filled with information on the total number and capacity from 3R facilities available in district/city. These facilities can take the form of Integrated 3R Waste Management Facilities, Garbage Bank, or the others.

10. Columns 40 and 41 are filled with the total number and capacity of composting facilities available in district/city.

The data to be filled in the indicator form can be obtained from:

a. Provincial RAD-GRK Reports.

b. Provincial GHG Inventory Reports.


c. Susenas (National Social Economic Survey) Result on Sanitation Data from Central Bureau of Statistics (BPS).

d. Waste Water & Waste Study (EHRA) by Bappeda (local development planning agency) for the development of City/District White Book .

e. Garbage Management Performance Data from BLH (Environmental Agency) for Adipura scoring.

f. Performance Data/ Annual Report/Profiles of District/City Dinas/Agency/UPTD(Regional Technical Implementing Unit)/City Cleanliness Division.

g. Performance Data/Annual Report/Profiles of City/District Environmental Agency.

h. Waste Master Plan/Outline Plan

i. Waste Water Master Plan/Outline Plan.

j. White Book K/K available in Working Unit of Environmental and Settlement Sanitation/ Bappeda’s PPSP (Housing Sanitation Development Acceleration) Working Group.

k. City Sanitation Strategy in Environmental and Settlement Sanitation Working Group/ Bappeda’s PPSP (Housing Sanitation Development Acceleration) Working Group



1No.

26

104

812

37

115

913

1514

16

City

/Dist

rict

Num

ber o

f Po

pula

tion

(peo

ple)

Garb

age

Pile

kg/p

erso

n/da

yDi

aper

Rube

rFo

od W

aste

Park

Ga

rbag

eM

etal

Gg/y

ear

Woo

dPl

astic

Pape

rTe

xtile

Glas

sO

ther

Garb

age

Com

posit

ion

(%)

FORM

4.1

.4 P

rovi

ncia

l GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Nat

iona

l Was

te M

anag

emen

t Wor

king

Gro

up

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:


2017

2226

1924

2818

2327

2125

2931

3032

Dry

Mat

eria

l Con

tent

s of D

omes

tic S

oild

Was

te (%

)

Food

Was

teDi

aper

Rube

rD

umpe

d to

La

ndfil

l/T

PA

Park

Garb

age

Met

alRe

cycl

edPa

per

Woo

dPl

astic

Com

post

edTe

xtile

Glas

sBu

rned

Oth

erUn

man

aged

Garb

age

Man

agem

ent D

istrib

utio

n (%

)

FORM

4.1

.4 P

rovi

ncia

l GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Nat

iona

l Was

te M

anag

emen

t Wor

king

Gro

up

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:



3342

3741

3543

3934

3836

40

Garb

age

Man

agem

ent F

acili

ty

Nam

e of

La

ndfil

l(T

PA)

m3/

day

MA

USQ

uant

ity(U

nit)

Qua

ntity

(Uni

t)To

nM

SUD

Land

fill (

TPA)

Di

strib

utio

n ba

sed

on

Type

(%)

Tota

l M

anag

emen

t Ca

paci

ty

(ton/

year

)

Aver

age

garb

age

volu

me

to L

andfi

ll (T

PA)

3R Fa

cilit

yCo

mpo

stin

g Fa

cilit

yLa

ndfil

l (TP

A) D

istrib

utio

n ba

sed

on Ty

pe (%

)

FORM

4.1

.4 P

rovi

ncia

l GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Solid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic S

olid

Was

te

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Nat

iona

l Was

te M

anag

emen

t Wor

king

Gro

up

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:


1 2 ...3 33No.

26

104

812

37

115

913

1514

16

City

/Dist

rict

Num

ber o

f Po

pula

tion

(peo

ple)

Was

te M

anag

emen

t Dist

ribut

ion

(%)

Dum

ped

to la

ndfil

l (T

PA)

Unm

anag

edM

SRe

cycl

edUD

Tota

l Man

-ag

emen

t Ca

paci

ty

(ton/

year

)

Tota

l Man

-ag

emen

t Ca

paci

ty

(ton/

year

)Co

mpo

sted

USQ

uant

ity(U

nit)

Qua

ntity

(Uni

t)Bu

rned

MA

Num

ber o

f Was

te M

anag

emen

t Fac

ility

Land

fill B

ased

on

Type

3R Fa

cilit

yCo

mpo

stin

g Fa

cilit

y

FORM

4.1

.5 N

atio

nal G

HG

Inve

ntor

y Fo

rm fo

r Dom

esti

c So

lid W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E/D

OM

ESTI

C SO

LID

WA

STE

MA

NA

GEM

ENT

CATA

GO

RY

: N

atio

nal

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Nat

iona

l Was

te M

anag

emen

t Wor

king

Gro

up

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:



Instructions to fill in Form 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

Provincial Indicator Forms for domestic solid waste and domestic liquid waste sub-sectors constitute a compilation of information collected at the district/city levels. These forms are earmarked for monitoring and evaluating indicators related to GHG emissions from domestic solid waste and liquid solid waste sub-sectors in a province every year.

National Indicator Form for domestic solid waste and domestic liquid waste sub-sectors constitutes a compilation of information collected at the provincial level. The form is earmarked for monitoring and evaluating indicators related to GHG emission form domestic solid waste and domestic liquid waste sub-sectors at the national level every year.


4.2 DOMESTIC LIQUID WASTE SUB-SECTOR

Core mitigation actions of domestic liquid waste sub-sector are generally divided into 2 parts: (1) Off-site liquid waste management facility development, and(2) On-site liquid waste management facility development

The supporting mitigation activities of the domestic liquid waste sub-sector are divided into two big parts: (1) Institutional and regulation development, (2) Human resources capacity development.

In the domestic liquid waste sub-sector GHG inventory is conducted. Its indicators include: - Social grouping based on the level of income, living in rural areas, urban

communities with middle to high income, as well as urban communities with medium to low income;

- Proportion of domestic liquid waste management facilities used by the people in rural areas which are divided into septic tanks, pit latrines, centralized management (sewerage system), other types as well as without management (dumped into rivers or water body).

- Proportion of domestic liquid waste management facilities used by urban communities with medium to high income level which are divided into septic tanks, pit latrines, centralized management (sewerage system), other types as well as without management (dumped into rivers or water body);

- Proportion of domestic liquid waste management facilities used by urban communities with medium to low income level which are divided into septic tanks, pit latrines, centralized management (sewerage system), other types as well as without management (dumped into rivers or water body);

GHG Inventory in domestic liquid waste sub-sector is conducted at the district/city level and then compiled at the provincial and national level



16

82

79

311

104

5

No.

Title

of S

uppo

rtin

g M

itiga

tion

Actio

n/Ac

tivity

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

in R

AD-G

RK (r

upia

h)Im

plem

ente

r

Targ

et

RAD

-GRK

Loca

tion

RAD

-GRK

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

LPJ

RAD

-GRK

LPJ

LPJ

Unit

Unit

FORM

4.2

.1 C

ore

Act

ivit

y Fo

rm fo

r Dom

esti

c Li

quid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


1213

1415

1617

1819

2021

2223

24

Qua

rter

IV

Budg

et u

se b

ased

on

Sour

ce (R

upia

h)Ke

y pe

rform

ance

indi

cato

r

APBN

Qua

rter

IV

Prov

inci

alAP

BD

Qua

rter

IV

City

/Di

stric

tAP

BD

Qua

rter

IV

PHLN

Qua

rter

IV

Priv

ate

Sect

or Fu

ndD

etai

lsQ

uant

ityUn

it

GHG

Emiss

ion

Redu

ctio

n(to

n CO

2e)

GHG

Emis-

sion

with

m

itiga

tion

actio

n(to

n CO

2e)

BAU

Base

line

GHG

Emis-

sion

(ton

CO2e

)

Co-B

enefi

tSu

ppor

ting

info

rmat

ion

FORM

4.2

.1 C

ore

acti

vity

For

m fo

r Dom

esti

c Li

quid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r (Co

ntin

uati

on)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




This core activity form is used for monitoring and evaluating each mitigation action categorized as core activity that produces GHG emission directly. The form is filled by The Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments twice a year based on their respective authorities. The filling-in of the form is conducted as follows.




4. Column 4 is filled with location of mitigation action/activity in RAD-GRK document.

5. Column 5 is filled with location of mitigation action/activity in LPJ document.















20. Column 20 is filled with GHG emission reduction produced from each mitigation action.


21. Column 21 is filled with BAU baseline emission status for waste sector in the reporting year. See provincial RAD-GRK document to get this data.

22. Column 22 is filled with estimated GHG emission for waste sector in the reporting year, if mitigation activities are implemented. The 2006 IPCC GL Spreadsheet is used in conducting estimation of GHG emission reduction from outcome/IKK (key performance indicator) of each completed activity.

23. Column 23 is filled with other various information deemed necessary to convey as related to mitigation action implementation



16

82

79

311

104

5

No.

Title

of S

uppo

rtin

g M

itiga

tion

Actio

n/Ac

tivity

Budg

et A

lloca

tion

in R

AD-G

RK (r

upia

h)Im

plem

ente

r

Targ

et

RAD

-GRK

Loca

tion

RAD

-GRK

Qua

ntity

Qua

ntity

LPJ

RAD

-GRK

LPJ

LPJ

Unit

Unit

FORM

4.2

.2 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for D

omes

tic

Liqu

id W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:


1213

1415

1617

1819

20

Qua

rter

IV

Budg

et u

se B

ased

on

Sour

ce (R

upia

h)Ke

y pe

rform

ance

indi

cato

r

APBN

Qua

rter

IV

Prov

inci

alAP

BD

Qua

rter

IV

City

/Dist

rict

APBD

Qua

rter

IV

PHLN

Qua

rter

IV

Priv

ate

Sect

or Fu

ndD

etai

lsQ

uant

ityUn

it

Supp

ort

Info

rmat

ion

FORM

4.2

.2 S

uppo

rtin

g A

ctiv

ity

Form

for D

omes

tic

Liqu

id W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor (

Cont

inua

tion

)

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




This supporting activity form is used for monitoring and evaluating each mitigation action categorized as supporting activities that produce GHG emission reduction directly. The form is filled by The Central Government/ Provincial Governments/ District/City Governments twice a year based on their respective authorities. The filling-in of the form is conducted as follows.



3. Column 3 is filled with the title of each of the completed mitigation actions/activities in the LPJ of provincial/ city-district local budget (APBD).

4. Column 4 is filled with location of mitigation action in RAD-GRK document.

5. Column 5 is filled with location of mitigation action in LPJ document.

6. Column 6 is filled with the number of target activities in RAD-GRK.

7. Column 7 is filled with activity unit in LPJ document.

8. Column 8 is filled with the number of target activities in LPJ document.

9. Column 9 is filled with activity target unit in LPJ Document.











20. Column 20 is filled with other various information deemed necessary to convey as related to mitigation action implementation.


1 1 2 3

Rura

l

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to

High

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to

Low

26

124

108

143

713

511

915

No.

Latri

ne5)

Dist

ribut

ion

of D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

Man

agem

ent a

nd D

ispos

al S

yste

m U

tiliza

tion

(%)

Inco

me

Grou

p

Popu

latio

n Pr

opor

tion

(%)

Dire

ct

Disp

osal

to

river

s, sw

amps

, an

d se

a

Cent

raliz

ed

aero

bic I

PAL

(poo

rly m

ain-

tain

ed)

Sept

ic Ta

nkFl

owin

g se

wer

2)

Anae

robi

c sh

allo

w

lago

on 3)

Com

mun

al

Dry

Latri

neSt

agna

nt

sew

er 1)

Anae

robi

c di

gest

er

for m

ud

Indi

vidu

al D

ry

Latri

ne

(3-5

peo

ple)

Cent

raliz

ed

Aero

bic I

PAL

(wel

l mai

n-ta

ined

)

Anae

robi

c de

ep la

goon

4)W

et L

atrin

e

Not

e1)

Sta

gnan

t sew

er is

a ty

pe o

f was

te w

ater

dis

posa

l sys

tem

whe

re th

ere

is n

o w

ater

flow

, for

exa

mpl

e po

nd a

nd th

e lik

e.2)

Flo

win

g se

wer

is a

type

of w

aste

wat

er d

ispo

sal s

yste

m w

here

ther

e is

wat

er fl

ow, f

or e

xam

ple

river

s, di

tche

s (o

pen

and

clos

ed)

3) A

naer

obic

was

te w

ater

trea

tmen

t pon

d w

ith le

ss-t

han-

2 m

eter

dep

th4)

Ana

erob

ic w

aste

wat

er tr

eatm

ent p

ond

with

mor

e-th

an-2

met

er d

epth

5)

- L

atrin

e is

a s

impl

e M

CK (b

athi

ng, w

ashi

ng a

nd to

ilet)

faci

lity

with

out w

aste

wat

er tr

eatm

ent s

yste

m, f

or e

xam

ple

pit l

atrin

e an

d la

trin

e w

ithou

t sep

tic ta

nk.

-

Dry

latr

ine:

latr

ine

whi

ch is

loca

ted

in d

ry c

limat

e ar

ea w

ith g

roun

d w

ater

sur

face

pos

ition

und

er th

e la

trin

e’s

bott

om.

-

Wet

latr

ine:

latr

ine

whi

ch is

loca

ted

in w

et c

limat

e ar

ea o

r gro

und

wat

er s

urfa

ce p

ositi

on a

bove

latr

ine’

s bo

ttom

.

FORM

4.2

.3 D

istr

ict/

City

GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Liqu

id W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:

Dis

tric

t/Ci

ty G

over

nmen

t D

istr

ict/

City

:




The District/City GHG Inventory Form for Domestic Liquid Waste sub-sector is earmarked for monitoring and evaluating indicators related to GHG emissions from domestic liquid waste sub-sector in district/city levels every year. The form is filled by District/City Governments with supervision from Provincial Governments. The form should be filled in with the following step:

1. Column 3 is filled with proportion/fraction of population in rural and urban areas with medium to high income and urban communities with medium to low income. The data can probably be obtained from the local Centre of Statistics Agency (BPS). The total amount for column 3 must be 100%.

2. In line 1, columns 4 through 15 are filled with proportion/fraction of distribution of rural domestic liquid waste disposal and treatment types. The total amount of columns 4 through 15 in line 1 must be similar to 100.

3. In line 2, columns 4 through 15 are filled with proportion/fraction of distribution of urban domestic liquid waste disposal and treatment types with the population of medium to high income. The amount of columns 4 through 15 in line 2 must be similar to 100%.

4. In line 3, columns 4 through 15 are filled with proportion/fraction of distribution of urban domestic liquid waste disposal and treatment types with the population of medium to low income. The amount of columns 4 to 15 in line 3 must be similar to 100%.


1 1 1 12 2 2Rura

l

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to H

igh

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to L

ow

26

124

108

143

713

511

915

No.

Latri

neDi

strib

utio

n of

Dom

estic

Liq

uid

Was

te M

anag

emen

t and

Disp

osal

Sys

tem

Util

izatio

n (%

)

City

/Dist

rict

Popu

latio

n Pr

opor

tion

(%)

Dire

ct D

is-po

sal t

o riv

ers,

swam

ps, a

nd

sea

Cent

raliz

ed

aero

bic I

PAL

(poo

rly m

ain-

tain

ed)

Sept

ic Ta

nkFl

owin

gSe

wer

2)

Anae

robi

c Sh

allo

wLa

goon

3)

Com

mun

al

Dry

Latri

neSt

agna

ntSe

wer

1)

Anae

robi

c di

gest

er fo

r m

ud

Indi

vidu

al

Dry

Latri

ne

(3-5

peo

ple)

Cent

raliz

ed

Aero

bic I

PAL

(wel

l mai

n-ta

ined

)

Anae

robi

cD

eep

Lago

on4)

Wet

Lat

rine

FORM

4.2

.4 P

rovi

ncia

l GH

G In

vent

ory

Form

for D

omes

tic

Liqu

id W

aste

Sub

-Sec

tor

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:

Prov

inci

al G

over

nmen

t Pr

ovin

ce

:



Note1) Stagnant sewer is a type of waste water disposal system where there is no water flow, for example

pond and the like.2) Flowing sewer is a type of waste water disposal system where there is water flow, for example rivers,

ditches (open and closed)3) Anaerobic waste water treatment pond with less-than-2 meter depth4) Anaerobic waste water treatment pond with more-than-2 meter depth 5) - Latrine is a simple MCK (bathing, washing and toilet) facility without waste water treatment system,

for example pit latrine and latrine without septic tank.

- Dry latrine : latrine which is located in dry climate area with ground water surface position under the latrine’s bottom.

- Wet latrine : latrine which is located in wet climate area or ground water surface position above latrine’s bottom.


Compile each type of domestic liquid waste management and disposal in every city/district, then the result is put into the provincial-level indicator form in the form 4.2.4.


1 1 1 12 2 2Rura

l

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to H

igh

Urba

n –

Med

ium

to L

ow

26

124

108

143

713

511

915

No.

Latri

neDi

strib

utio

n of

Dom

estic

Liq

uid

Was

te M

anag

emen

t and

Disp

osal

Sys

tem

Util

izatio

n (%

)

Prov

ince

Popu

latio

n Pr

opor

tion

(%)

Dire

ct D

is-po

sal t

o riv

ers,

swam

ps, a

nd

sea

Cent

raliz

ed

aero

bic I

PAL

(poo

rly m

ain-

tain

ed)

Sept

ic Ta

nkFl

owin

gSe

wer

2)

Anae

robi

c Sh

allo

wLa

goon

3)

Com

mun

al

Dry

Latri

neSt

agna

ntSe

wer

1)

Anae

robi

c di

gest

er fo

r m

ud

Indi

vidu

al

Dry

Latri

ne

(3-5

peo

ple)

Cent

raliz

ed

Aero

bic I

PAL

(wel

l mai

n-ta

ined

)

Anae

robi

cD

eep

Lago

on4)

Wet

Lat

rine

FORM

4.2

.5 N

atio

nal G

HG

Inve

ntor

y Fo

rm fo

r Dom

esti

c Li

quid

Was

te S

ub-S

ecto

r

SEC

TOR

: W

AST

E M

AN

AG

EMEN

T

CATA

GO

RY

: D

omes

tic L

iqui

d W

aste

YEA

R :

REPO

RTER

:

Cent

ral G

over

nmen

t M

inis

try

:



Note1) Stagnant sewer is a type of waste water disposal system where there is no water flow, for example

pond and the like.2) Flowing sewer is a type of waste water disposal system where there is water flow, for example rivers,

ditches (open and closed)3) Anaerobic waste water treatment pond with less-than-2 meter depth4) Anaerobic waste water treatment pond with more-than-2 meter depth5) - Latrine is a simple MCK (bathing, washing and toilet) facility without waste water treatment system,

for example pit latrine and latrine without septic tank.

- Dry latrine: latrine which is located in dry climate area with ground water surface position under the latrine’s bottom.

- Wet latrine: latrine which is located in wet climate area or ground water surface position above

latrine’s bottom.


Similarly for the national level, this constitutes the recapitulation from the provincial level and put into form 4.2.5.




BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agus, F., Wahyunto, A. Dariah, E. Runtunuwu, E. Susanti and W. Supriatna. 2012. Emission Reduction Options for Peatland in Kubu Raya and Pontianak Districts, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Journal of Oil Palm Research 24:1378-1387.

Agus F, Hairiah K, Mulyani A. 2011. Pengukuran Cadangan Karbon Tanah Gambut. Petunjuk Praktis. World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, SEA Regional Office dan Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian (BBSDLP), Bogor, Indonesia. 58 p.

Agus, F., Wahyunto, Dariah, A., Setyanto, P., Subiksa, I. M., Runtunuwu, E., et al, 2010. Carbon Budget and Management Strategies for Conserving Carbon in Peatland: Case Study in Kubu Raya and Pontianak Districts, West kalimantan, Indonesia. Proceedings Of International Workshop of Evaluation and Sustainable Management of Soil Carbon Sequestration in Asia Countries (pp. 217-234). Bogor: Indonesian Soil Research Institute.

Agus, F., E. Handayani, M. Van Noordwijk, K. Idris dan S. Sabiham, 2010a. Root respiration interferes with peat CO2 emission measurement. pp. 50-53 In Proceedings 2010 19th World Congress of Soil Science, 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia. Published on DVD.

Dharmawan, I. W., Arifanti, V. B., Lugina, M., & Naito, R. 2013. Enhanced Approaches to Estimate Net Emission Reductions from Deforestation and Degradation of Undrained Peat Swamp Forests in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Bogor: Forestry Research and Development Agency Ministry of Forestry,METI Japan and ITTO.

Direktorat Jenderal Ketenagalistrikan, KESDM. 2012. Surat Nomor 1281/05/600.4/2012 perihal Penyampaian Perhitungan Faktor Emisi Proyek Clean Development Mechanism, 8 Februari 2012.

Hooijer A, Page S, Canadell JG, Silvius M, Kwadijk J, Wösten H, Jauhiainen J. 2010. Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences, 7, pp 1505–1514.

Hooijer A, Silvius M, Wösten H Page S. 2006. PEAT-CO2, Assessment of CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in SE Asia. Delft Hydraulics report Q3943.

Husin, Y.A, 1994. Methane flux from Indonesia wetland rice: the effects of water management and rice variety. [Disertasi]

IAERI Annual Report 2007-2011IAERI 2007a, Identifikasi emisi GRK pada sistem pengelolaan padi terpadu di lahan

sawah irigasi. Final reportIAERI 2007b,Pengaruh Pengelolaan Pertanian Padi Sawah Terhadap Emisi GRK di

Tanah Gambut. Final report.IAERI 2007c. Indentifikasi emisi GRK pada sistem pengelolaan padi terpadu di lahan

sawah irigasi.Final report.IAERI 2007d. Pengaruh Pengelolaan Pertanian Padi Sawah Terhadap Emisi GRK di

Tanah Gambut.Final report


IAERI 2006a. Final report :Pengaruh varietas padi pasang surut terhadap emisi GRK di lahan sawah pasang surut

IAERI 2006b. Pengaruh varietas padi pasang surut terhadap emisi GRK di lahan sawah pasang surut.Final report

IAERI 2006c. Pengaruh varietas padi pasang surut terhadap emisi GRK di lahan sawah pasang surut.Final report

IAERI 2005. Pengaruh varietas padi pasang surut terhadap emisi gas rumah kaca di lahan sawah pasang surut. Final report

IAERI 2004a,Penelitian validasi model CH4 di lahan sawah, Final reportIAERI 2004b. Mitigasi GRK pada lahan sulfat masam tipe luapan B di Kalimantan

selatan.Final reportIAERI 2003a,Pengolahan tanah dan sumber pupuk N untuk menekan emisi gas CH4

di lahan sawah vertisol,Annual reportIAERI 2003b, Validasi model simulasi untuk mengukur potensi dan emisi gas CH4

pada lahan sawah irigasi,Annual reportIAERI 2002a Emisi dan mitigasi gas CH4 dan N2O pada berbagai model pola tanam

di lahan sawah tadah hujan.Annual report.IAERI 2002b Kuantifikasi emisi gas-gas rumah kaca pada lahan sawah di Jawa,

Annual report. IAERI 2002c Pengaruh takaran azolla pada sistem minapadi terhadap produktivitas

dan emisi GRK di lahan sawah, Annual report.IAERI 2001a.Annual report:Emisi dan mitigasi gas CH4 dan N2O dari pengolahan

tanah, varietas dan pemberian bahan organik dalam pola tanam padi-palawija pada lahan sawah tadah hujan

IAERI 2001b.Annual report:Pengaruh dosis dan jenis pupuk N terhadap besarnya emisi CH4 dan N2O pada lahan sawah irigasi Vertisol

IAERI 2001c.Annual report:Pengaruh varietas padi terhadap besarnya emisi gas CH4 pada lahan sawah irigasi vertisol

IAERI 2001dEmisi dan mitigasi gas CH4 dan N2O dari pengolahan tanah, varietas dan pemberian bahan organik dalam pola tanam padi-palawija pada lahan sawah tadah hujan. Annual Report.

IAERI 2001e. Pengaruh varietas padi terhadap besarnya emisi gas CH4 pada lahan sawah irigasi vertisol. Annual report

IAERI 1999,Emisi gas CH4 dari Berbagai Varietas Padi,Annual Report 1998/99 IAERI 1998a,Emisi metan dari berbagai sistem pengaturan air pada lahan

sawah,Annual report 1997/1998IAERI 1998b,Pengaruh beberapa varietas padi terhadap emisi gas metana pada

lahan sawah, Annual Report 1997/1998IAERI 1997, Annual Report 1996/97 JICA. 2004. Study of Integrated Transportation Master Plan for Jabodetabek (SITRAM

Phase II). Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Metodologi penghitungan tingkat emisi

GRK kegiatan pengadaan dan penggunaan energi. Volume 1. Jakarta: KLH.



Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Metodologi penghitungan tingkat emisi GRK kegiatan proses industri dan penggunaan produk. Volume 2. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Metodologi penghitungan tingkat emisi GRK kegiatan pertanian, kehutanan, dan penggunaan lahan lainnya. Volume 3. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Metodologi penghitungan tingkat emisi GRK kegiatan pengelolaan limbah. Volume 4. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2012. Pedoman penyelenggaraan inventarisasi gas rumah kaca nasional. Buku I Pedoman Umum. Jakarta: KLH.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas, 2011. Pedoman pelaksanaan Rencana Aksi Penurunan emisi GRK. Jakarta: Bappenas.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. 2011. Pedoman penyusunan Rencana Aksi Daerah Penurunan emisi GRK (RAD-GRK). Jakarta: Bappenas.

Konsorsium PI 2009, Identifikasi dan Pengujian Varietas Padi Rendah Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca. Report 2008-2009.

Masripatin, N, Dharmawan, IWSD dan Gintings, ANg. 2009. Indonesia Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap: Forestry Sector. Kerjasama antara Bappenas dan FORDA.

Mulyadi, A. Pramono, Poniman dan A. Wihadjaka. 2004. Pengaruh Pupuk Kandang Terhadap Hasil Padi Gogo Rancah dan Emisi Gas CH4 di Lahan sawah Tadah Hujan. Seminar nasional pengelolaan lingkungan pertanian. 479-485.

Planologi, D. I. (2012). Sosialisasi REL (Reference Emission Level) Sektor Kehutanan Tingkat Nasional. Materi Presentasi Sosisalisasi REL Sektor Kehutanan. Bogor: Dirjen Planologi Kementerian Kehutanan.

Presiden Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 61 Tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Aksi Nasional Penurunan Emisi GRK.

Setyanto, P, 2004, Methane emission from rice field under different crop establishments and rice cultivars.[Disertasi]

Setyanto, P,2000, Methane emission from three soil types planted with flooded rice (Thesis)

Setyanto, P, Methane emission in different water regimes. [Disertasi] Setyanto, P, Burhan, H, Jatmiko, S.Y, 2008. Effectiveness of water regime and soil

management on methane emission reduction from rice field. Prosiding seminar Nasional pencemaran lingkungan pertanian melalui pendekatan pengelolaan daerah aliran sungai (DAS) secara terpadu. 219-233

Setyanto, P, Makarim, A, K., Fagi, A, M., Wassmann, R, Buendia, L, V. 2000. Crop management affecting methane emission from irrigated and rainfed rice in central Java. N.C.E. 58 : 85-124

Setyanto, P, Makarim, A, K., Fagi, A, M., Wassmann, R, Buendia, L, V. 2000. Crop management affecting methane emission from irrigated and rainfed rice in central Java. N.C.E. 58 : 85-93

Setyanto, P, Suharsih, A. Wihardjaka, A. K Makarim. 1999. Pengaruh pemberian pupuk anorganik terhadap emisi gas metan pada lahan sawah. Risalah Seminar hasil penelitian emisi gas rumah kaca dan peningkatan produktifitas padi di lahan sawah. 36-43.


Suharsih, P. Setyanto, A.K. Makarim. 2004. “Emisi gas metan pada lahan sawah irigasi inceptisol akibat pemupukan nitrogen pada tanaman padi.”PP Tanaman Pangan 22 (2) : 43-47

Setyanto et al. 2002. Influence of soil properties on CH4 emission from rice field, IJAS. Assume to be the same as Oxisol.

Date post:	18-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dangkien
View:	233 times
Download:	2 times