bullrgterfuii(i Recordf Center y ^ ( ^ ^ 0gt
o eo
u Qo
If)
Q
Technical Memorandum Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
J Prepared by
Tetra Tech EC Inc 133 Federal Street Boston MA 02110
Submitted by Tetra Tech EC Inc on behalf of Jacobs - Tetra Tech EC Joint Venture Two Center Plaza Boston MA 02108-1906
2008-O-JV03-0008 | 1 1
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silreslm Superfund Site
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L SITE CHRONOLOGYn REVISED AND UPDATED BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES AND CLEAN-UP GOALS
1 3
TABLES
Table 1 Chronology of Silresim Site Risk AssessmentManagement Activities Table 2 Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - OralDermal Table 3 Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation Table 4 Cancer Toxicity Data - OralDermal Table 5 Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation Table 6 Determination of VolatiUty for Application of a Volatilization Factor for the Surface
and Subsurface Soil COCs Table 7 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the CommercialIndustrial Worker Table 8 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the Construction Worker Table 9 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the Trespasser Table 10 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (B AVs) and Recommended
Clean-up Goals (CUGs) Table 11 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and Recommended
Clean-Up Goals (CUGs) Table 12 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and Recommended
Clean-Up Goals (CUGs)
APPENDIX
Appendix A Sample Calculations of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
April 30 2008
This memorandum summarizes the completion of two additional tasks with regard to the Silresim Superftmd Site (the Site)
I) Developing a chronological summary of the principal risk assessment and risk management activities that have been conducted at or in relation to the Silresim Superfund Site (the Site) over the past few years and
II) Developing and describing revised site-specific risk-based Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and recommended Clean-Up Goals (CUGs) for the Site that reflect a number of updated technical and policy considerations that have arisen since the submittal of the Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) (USEPA September 2003)
These two tasks are discussed in the sections that follow
I Site Chronology
The Silresim Site has been undergoing active assessment and remedial actions for a number of years Aspects of the risk assessment and risk management approach have been adjusted over this period in response to new information about the Site new regulatory policies and new scientific information regarding contaminant dose-response and risk assessment These adjustments have been overseen by various Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) from the United States Enviroiunental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 1 and Massachusetts Department of Enviroimiental Protection (MassDEP) On September 13 2005 the RPM requested that a chronology of Site-related risk assessment and risk management activities be compiled Table I presents this chronology The principal risk assessment activities associated with the Site are further highlighted below
Baseline human health and ecological risk assessments were completed in March 1990 as part of the Remedial Investigation (RI) The principal finding of this assessment was the potential risks projected for a number of current and anticipated fiiture users ofthe Site and adjacent properties A Record of Decision (ROD) was written in 1991 In addition vapor intrusion was subsequently identified as a topic to further evaluate relative to the occupied buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel (LIampS) property
The 5-Year ROD Review in 1999 identified and highlighted a number of important changes that occurred with respect to the Site that prompted a revision and updating of the Site management approach and the associated CUGs An initial set of revised CUGs was developed in 2001 (Foster Wheeler 2001) These modified CUGs were calculated specifically to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Railroad Workers who may be exposed to impacted soil and groundwater associated with the Site (as applicable) Further discussion by the Site Managers identified additional modifications and adjustments that were warranted The Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals issued in January 2002 (Foster Wheeler 2002) hereafter called 2002 CUG Report expanded the focus of the original risk assessments by addressing the potential risks to Child Recreational Users in response to a request from MassDEP The Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) (USEPA September 2003a) document included a comparison ofthe 2002 CUGs to Site data Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) and the CUGs that were presented in the original ROD
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Subsequent to the 2002 CUG Report renewed interest in the potential risks to Utility Workers arose and the investigation of potential vapor intrusion into subsurface structures and buildings at the adjacent LIampS property continued In September of 2004 the potential for indoor inhalation and the associated risk to Utility Workers at the LIampS property was evaluated and CUGs were calculated for this receptor group (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004) In 2005 USEPA Region 1 directed that recreational use of these properties by adults as well as by children also should be evaluated Simultaneously any updates to the toxicity values that were used in the CUG development and any changes associated with updated risk assessment guidance also were to be incorporated into the development of the new values A draft of these revised and updated CUGs was submitted to USEPA Region 1 and MassDEP in late 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a 2005b) Following review USEPA Region 1 transmitted a memo to TtEC (December 6 2007) containing comments and direction regarding revisions and updates to both the BAVs and the recommended CUGs (USEAP 2007b) The principal revisions and updates related to
1 Removing the vapor intrusion component from the BAV calculations for receptors at off-property locations where that potential pathway was an assumed contributor to risk - Additional investigation and evaluation by USEPA Region I was summarized in a Memorandum by J DiLorenzo former USEPA Remedial Project Manager on the Silresim Site (USEPA November 29 2007a) concluded that there is currently not a complete Silresim Site-related indoor air exposure pathway at the BampL Auto Parts location (ie the off-property location nearest and down-gradient of the groundwater contamination other than the LIS facility that was explicitly investigated relative to possible vapor intrusion) The April 14 2008 Property Use Assessment of the LIS property similarly concluded that indoor air migration is not a complete pathway at the multiple LIS facilities In addition this assessment suggested that a periodic review of property use be performed concurrent with the annual MassDEP groundwater sampling and no less than every 5 years by USEPA Subsequently USEPA Region 1 directed that this exposure pathway not be included in the BAV calculations for these off-property receptors
2 Evaluating inhalation risk using the Reference Concentration (RfC) and Inhalation Unit Risk (lUR) toxicity factors instead of the inhalation Reference Doses (RfDs) and inhalation Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) - Supplemental federal guidance for Superfitnd inhalation risk assessment is currently being drafted to specify that this approach be applied to inhalation risk assessment at CERCLA sites In 1996 (USEPA 1996) and 2002 (USEPA 2002d) USEPA published and then updated the Soil Screening Guidance documents which implement the RfCIUR approach in developing risk-based Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) USEPA Region 1 has adopted this approach for use in inhalation risk assessments and in the development of risk-based clean-up goals The inhalation risk assessment components of the BAVs were borrowed from the corresponding components ofthe earlier baseline risk assessment which used the older approach
The remainder of this memorandum documents the cumulative set of actions that have been taken to revise and update the BAVs and CUGs since the submittal of the ESD docimient (USEPA September 2003)
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
II Revised and Updated Benclimarlc Assessment Values and Clean-Up Goals
The CUGs previously established for the surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater at the Site (as described in the 2002 CUG Report and documented in the ESD (USEPA September 2003a) were further revised and updated in various modifications as indicated above Risk-based BAVs represent the starting point of the CUG specification process The contaminant-specific BAVs are the concentration of that contaminant in a particular exposure medium that is projected to correspond to a specified target risk level to an identified receptor group exposed to that medium now or during reasonably anticipated future uses BAVs were calculated for each chemical of potential concern (COPC) based on the potential for them to cause carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effects endpoints The target excess lifetime cancer risk goal specified for individual carcinogenic COPCs was 1 x 10 and the target Hazard Index for non-carcinogenic COPCs was specified to be 1 These BAVs along with several other criteria and published standards will be considered by the Site Managers in the ultimate specification ofthe CUGs for the Site
The following summarizes the changes that were made to the inputs to our approach for calculating the BAVs as a result of the full set of cumulative comments and suggestions received from USEPA Region I during the period 2003 to 2007
1 Modification of the List of Target Receptors for the Site Relative to the Specification of CUGs
Summary Risk-based BAVs and recommended CUGs were calculated to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Utility Workers relative to the Site The BAVs that were developed previously to be protective of Railroad Workers and Aduh and Child Recreational Users were not updated and were not considered in the subsequent updated CUG development process
Discussion In discussions with USEPA Region 1 and the Site Managers it was decided that the recreational scenario was no longer a valid basis on which to develop CUGs for the Site Therefore the BAVs that were calculated for Adult and Child Recreational Users of the Site were removed from the comparison that identified the most stringent BAV calculated for each COPC In addition the occasional risk posed to Raikoad Workers was believed to be adequately addressed by the consideration of Construction Workers and Utility Workers Therefore Railroad Workers also were removed from the basis ofthe revised BAVs and recommended CUGs Since the Utility Worker risk assessment effort (see Table 1) did not include the calculation of CUGs relative to this receptor CUG spreadsheets were developed for Utility Workers using the equations and methods defined in the 2002 CUG Report and the exposure assumptions assumed in the September 2004 Utility Worker risk calculations The evaluation of risk with respect to the Utility Worker considers potential exposures to soil and contaminated groundwater that may be encountered while working in either a trench or an open excavation enviroimient
2 Consideration of Additional Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)
Summary Risk-based BAVs were calculated for 14-dioxane for each ofthe identified receptors relative to their potential exposure to impacted surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater
Discussion Based on the 5-Year Review conducted in 2004 USEPA requested that groundwater influent to the on-site groundwater treatment facility be analyzed for 14-dioxane This constituent was found to be present in the influent at levels above detection limits and therefore was subsequently included as a parameter in influent sampling In June of 2007 USEPA Region 1 determined that 14-dioxane should be included as a COPC for the Site and requested that BAVs and
2008-O-JV03-0008 3 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silreslm Superfund Site
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L SITE CHRONOLOGYn REVISED AND UPDATED BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES AND CLEAN-UP GOALS
1 3
TABLES
Table 1 Chronology of Silresim Site Risk AssessmentManagement Activities Table 2 Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - OralDermal Table 3 Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation Table 4 Cancer Toxicity Data - OralDermal Table 5 Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation Table 6 Determination of VolatiUty for Application of a Volatilization Factor for the Surface
and Subsurface Soil COCs Table 7 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the CommercialIndustrial Worker Table 8 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the Construction Worker Table 9 Adult Lead Model Assumptions and Calculations for the Trespasser Table 10 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (B AVs) and Recommended
Clean-up Goals (CUGs) Table 11 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and Recommended
Clean-Up Goals (CUGs) Table 12 Summary of Site-Specific Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and Recommended
Clean-Up Goals (CUGs)
APPENDIX
Appendix A Sample Calculations of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
April 30 2008
This memorandum summarizes the completion of two additional tasks with regard to the Silresim Superftmd Site (the Site)
I) Developing a chronological summary of the principal risk assessment and risk management activities that have been conducted at or in relation to the Silresim Superfund Site (the Site) over the past few years and
II) Developing and describing revised site-specific risk-based Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and recommended Clean-Up Goals (CUGs) for the Site that reflect a number of updated technical and policy considerations that have arisen since the submittal of the Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) (USEPA September 2003)
These two tasks are discussed in the sections that follow
I Site Chronology
The Silresim Site has been undergoing active assessment and remedial actions for a number of years Aspects of the risk assessment and risk management approach have been adjusted over this period in response to new information about the Site new regulatory policies and new scientific information regarding contaminant dose-response and risk assessment These adjustments have been overseen by various Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) from the United States Enviroiunental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 1 and Massachusetts Department of Enviroimiental Protection (MassDEP) On September 13 2005 the RPM requested that a chronology of Site-related risk assessment and risk management activities be compiled Table I presents this chronology The principal risk assessment activities associated with the Site are further highlighted below
Baseline human health and ecological risk assessments were completed in March 1990 as part of the Remedial Investigation (RI) The principal finding of this assessment was the potential risks projected for a number of current and anticipated fiiture users ofthe Site and adjacent properties A Record of Decision (ROD) was written in 1991 In addition vapor intrusion was subsequently identified as a topic to further evaluate relative to the occupied buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel (LIampS) property
The 5-Year ROD Review in 1999 identified and highlighted a number of important changes that occurred with respect to the Site that prompted a revision and updating of the Site management approach and the associated CUGs An initial set of revised CUGs was developed in 2001 (Foster Wheeler 2001) These modified CUGs were calculated specifically to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Railroad Workers who may be exposed to impacted soil and groundwater associated with the Site (as applicable) Further discussion by the Site Managers identified additional modifications and adjustments that were warranted The Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals issued in January 2002 (Foster Wheeler 2002) hereafter called 2002 CUG Report expanded the focus of the original risk assessments by addressing the potential risks to Child Recreational Users in response to a request from MassDEP The Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) (USEPA September 2003a) document included a comparison ofthe 2002 CUGs to Site data Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) and the CUGs that were presented in the original ROD
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Subsequent to the 2002 CUG Report renewed interest in the potential risks to Utility Workers arose and the investigation of potential vapor intrusion into subsurface structures and buildings at the adjacent LIampS property continued In September of 2004 the potential for indoor inhalation and the associated risk to Utility Workers at the LIampS property was evaluated and CUGs were calculated for this receptor group (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004) In 2005 USEPA Region 1 directed that recreational use of these properties by adults as well as by children also should be evaluated Simultaneously any updates to the toxicity values that were used in the CUG development and any changes associated with updated risk assessment guidance also were to be incorporated into the development of the new values A draft of these revised and updated CUGs was submitted to USEPA Region 1 and MassDEP in late 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a 2005b) Following review USEPA Region 1 transmitted a memo to TtEC (December 6 2007) containing comments and direction regarding revisions and updates to both the BAVs and the recommended CUGs (USEAP 2007b) The principal revisions and updates related to
1 Removing the vapor intrusion component from the BAV calculations for receptors at off-property locations where that potential pathway was an assumed contributor to risk - Additional investigation and evaluation by USEPA Region I was summarized in a Memorandum by J DiLorenzo former USEPA Remedial Project Manager on the Silresim Site (USEPA November 29 2007a) concluded that there is currently not a complete Silresim Site-related indoor air exposure pathway at the BampL Auto Parts location (ie the off-property location nearest and down-gradient of the groundwater contamination other than the LIS facility that was explicitly investigated relative to possible vapor intrusion) The April 14 2008 Property Use Assessment of the LIS property similarly concluded that indoor air migration is not a complete pathway at the multiple LIS facilities In addition this assessment suggested that a periodic review of property use be performed concurrent with the annual MassDEP groundwater sampling and no less than every 5 years by USEPA Subsequently USEPA Region 1 directed that this exposure pathway not be included in the BAV calculations for these off-property receptors
2 Evaluating inhalation risk using the Reference Concentration (RfC) and Inhalation Unit Risk (lUR) toxicity factors instead of the inhalation Reference Doses (RfDs) and inhalation Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) - Supplemental federal guidance for Superfitnd inhalation risk assessment is currently being drafted to specify that this approach be applied to inhalation risk assessment at CERCLA sites In 1996 (USEPA 1996) and 2002 (USEPA 2002d) USEPA published and then updated the Soil Screening Guidance documents which implement the RfCIUR approach in developing risk-based Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) USEPA Region 1 has adopted this approach for use in inhalation risk assessments and in the development of risk-based clean-up goals The inhalation risk assessment components of the BAVs were borrowed from the corresponding components ofthe earlier baseline risk assessment which used the older approach
The remainder of this memorandum documents the cumulative set of actions that have been taken to revise and update the BAVs and CUGs since the submittal of the ESD docimient (USEPA September 2003)
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
II Revised and Updated Benclimarlc Assessment Values and Clean-Up Goals
The CUGs previously established for the surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater at the Site (as described in the 2002 CUG Report and documented in the ESD (USEPA September 2003a) were further revised and updated in various modifications as indicated above Risk-based BAVs represent the starting point of the CUG specification process The contaminant-specific BAVs are the concentration of that contaminant in a particular exposure medium that is projected to correspond to a specified target risk level to an identified receptor group exposed to that medium now or during reasonably anticipated future uses BAVs were calculated for each chemical of potential concern (COPC) based on the potential for them to cause carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effects endpoints The target excess lifetime cancer risk goal specified for individual carcinogenic COPCs was 1 x 10 and the target Hazard Index for non-carcinogenic COPCs was specified to be 1 These BAVs along with several other criteria and published standards will be considered by the Site Managers in the ultimate specification ofthe CUGs for the Site
The following summarizes the changes that were made to the inputs to our approach for calculating the BAVs as a result of the full set of cumulative comments and suggestions received from USEPA Region I during the period 2003 to 2007
1 Modification of the List of Target Receptors for the Site Relative to the Specification of CUGs
Summary Risk-based BAVs and recommended CUGs were calculated to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Utility Workers relative to the Site The BAVs that were developed previously to be protective of Railroad Workers and Aduh and Child Recreational Users were not updated and were not considered in the subsequent updated CUG development process
Discussion In discussions with USEPA Region 1 and the Site Managers it was decided that the recreational scenario was no longer a valid basis on which to develop CUGs for the Site Therefore the BAVs that were calculated for Adult and Child Recreational Users of the Site were removed from the comparison that identified the most stringent BAV calculated for each COPC In addition the occasional risk posed to Raikoad Workers was believed to be adequately addressed by the consideration of Construction Workers and Utility Workers Therefore Railroad Workers also were removed from the basis ofthe revised BAVs and recommended CUGs Since the Utility Worker risk assessment effort (see Table 1) did not include the calculation of CUGs relative to this receptor CUG spreadsheets were developed for Utility Workers using the equations and methods defined in the 2002 CUG Report and the exposure assumptions assumed in the September 2004 Utility Worker risk calculations The evaluation of risk with respect to the Utility Worker considers potential exposures to soil and contaminated groundwater that may be encountered while working in either a trench or an open excavation enviroimient
2 Consideration of Additional Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)
Summary Risk-based BAVs were calculated for 14-dioxane for each ofthe identified receptors relative to their potential exposure to impacted surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater
Discussion Based on the 5-Year Review conducted in 2004 USEPA requested that groundwater influent to the on-site groundwater treatment facility be analyzed for 14-dioxane This constituent was found to be present in the influent at levels above detection limits and therefore was subsequently included as a parameter in influent sampling In June of 2007 USEPA Region 1 determined that 14-dioxane should be included as a COPC for the Site and requested that BAVs and
2008-O-JV03-0008 3 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
April 30 2008
This memorandum summarizes the completion of two additional tasks with regard to the Silresim Superftmd Site (the Site)
I) Developing a chronological summary of the principal risk assessment and risk management activities that have been conducted at or in relation to the Silresim Superfund Site (the Site) over the past few years and
II) Developing and describing revised site-specific risk-based Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) and recommended Clean-Up Goals (CUGs) for the Site that reflect a number of updated technical and policy considerations that have arisen since the submittal of the Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD) (USEPA September 2003)
These two tasks are discussed in the sections that follow
I Site Chronology
The Silresim Site has been undergoing active assessment and remedial actions for a number of years Aspects of the risk assessment and risk management approach have been adjusted over this period in response to new information about the Site new regulatory policies and new scientific information regarding contaminant dose-response and risk assessment These adjustments have been overseen by various Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) from the United States Enviroiunental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 1 and Massachusetts Department of Enviroimiental Protection (MassDEP) On September 13 2005 the RPM requested that a chronology of Site-related risk assessment and risk management activities be compiled Table I presents this chronology The principal risk assessment activities associated with the Site are further highlighted below
Baseline human health and ecological risk assessments were completed in March 1990 as part of the Remedial Investigation (RI) The principal finding of this assessment was the potential risks projected for a number of current and anticipated fiiture users ofthe Site and adjacent properties A Record of Decision (ROD) was written in 1991 In addition vapor intrusion was subsequently identified as a topic to further evaluate relative to the occupied buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel (LIampS) property
The 5-Year ROD Review in 1999 identified and highlighted a number of important changes that occurred with respect to the Site that prompted a revision and updating of the Site management approach and the associated CUGs An initial set of revised CUGs was developed in 2001 (Foster Wheeler 2001) These modified CUGs were calculated specifically to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Railroad Workers who may be exposed to impacted soil and groundwater associated with the Site (as applicable) Further discussion by the Site Managers identified additional modifications and adjustments that were warranted The Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals issued in January 2002 (Foster Wheeler 2002) hereafter called 2002 CUG Report expanded the focus of the original risk assessments by addressing the potential risks to Child Recreational Users in response to a request from MassDEP The Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) (USEPA September 2003a) document included a comparison ofthe 2002 CUGs to Site data Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) and the CUGs that were presented in the original ROD
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Subsequent to the 2002 CUG Report renewed interest in the potential risks to Utility Workers arose and the investigation of potential vapor intrusion into subsurface structures and buildings at the adjacent LIampS property continued In September of 2004 the potential for indoor inhalation and the associated risk to Utility Workers at the LIampS property was evaluated and CUGs were calculated for this receptor group (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004) In 2005 USEPA Region 1 directed that recreational use of these properties by adults as well as by children also should be evaluated Simultaneously any updates to the toxicity values that were used in the CUG development and any changes associated with updated risk assessment guidance also were to be incorporated into the development of the new values A draft of these revised and updated CUGs was submitted to USEPA Region 1 and MassDEP in late 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a 2005b) Following review USEPA Region 1 transmitted a memo to TtEC (December 6 2007) containing comments and direction regarding revisions and updates to both the BAVs and the recommended CUGs (USEAP 2007b) The principal revisions and updates related to
1 Removing the vapor intrusion component from the BAV calculations for receptors at off-property locations where that potential pathway was an assumed contributor to risk - Additional investigation and evaluation by USEPA Region I was summarized in a Memorandum by J DiLorenzo former USEPA Remedial Project Manager on the Silresim Site (USEPA November 29 2007a) concluded that there is currently not a complete Silresim Site-related indoor air exposure pathway at the BampL Auto Parts location (ie the off-property location nearest and down-gradient of the groundwater contamination other than the LIS facility that was explicitly investigated relative to possible vapor intrusion) The April 14 2008 Property Use Assessment of the LIS property similarly concluded that indoor air migration is not a complete pathway at the multiple LIS facilities In addition this assessment suggested that a periodic review of property use be performed concurrent with the annual MassDEP groundwater sampling and no less than every 5 years by USEPA Subsequently USEPA Region 1 directed that this exposure pathway not be included in the BAV calculations for these off-property receptors
2 Evaluating inhalation risk using the Reference Concentration (RfC) and Inhalation Unit Risk (lUR) toxicity factors instead of the inhalation Reference Doses (RfDs) and inhalation Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) - Supplemental federal guidance for Superfitnd inhalation risk assessment is currently being drafted to specify that this approach be applied to inhalation risk assessment at CERCLA sites In 1996 (USEPA 1996) and 2002 (USEPA 2002d) USEPA published and then updated the Soil Screening Guidance documents which implement the RfCIUR approach in developing risk-based Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) USEPA Region 1 has adopted this approach for use in inhalation risk assessments and in the development of risk-based clean-up goals The inhalation risk assessment components of the BAVs were borrowed from the corresponding components ofthe earlier baseline risk assessment which used the older approach
The remainder of this memorandum documents the cumulative set of actions that have been taken to revise and update the BAVs and CUGs since the submittal of the ESD docimient (USEPA September 2003)
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
II Revised and Updated Benclimarlc Assessment Values and Clean-Up Goals
The CUGs previously established for the surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater at the Site (as described in the 2002 CUG Report and documented in the ESD (USEPA September 2003a) were further revised and updated in various modifications as indicated above Risk-based BAVs represent the starting point of the CUG specification process The contaminant-specific BAVs are the concentration of that contaminant in a particular exposure medium that is projected to correspond to a specified target risk level to an identified receptor group exposed to that medium now or during reasonably anticipated future uses BAVs were calculated for each chemical of potential concern (COPC) based on the potential for them to cause carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effects endpoints The target excess lifetime cancer risk goal specified for individual carcinogenic COPCs was 1 x 10 and the target Hazard Index for non-carcinogenic COPCs was specified to be 1 These BAVs along with several other criteria and published standards will be considered by the Site Managers in the ultimate specification ofthe CUGs for the Site
The following summarizes the changes that were made to the inputs to our approach for calculating the BAVs as a result of the full set of cumulative comments and suggestions received from USEPA Region I during the period 2003 to 2007
1 Modification of the List of Target Receptors for the Site Relative to the Specification of CUGs
Summary Risk-based BAVs and recommended CUGs were calculated to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Utility Workers relative to the Site The BAVs that were developed previously to be protective of Railroad Workers and Aduh and Child Recreational Users were not updated and were not considered in the subsequent updated CUG development process
Discussion In discussions with USEPA Region 1 and the Site Managers it was decided that the recreational scenario was no longer a valid basis on which to develop CUGs for the Site Therefore the BAVs that were calculated for Adult and Child Recreational Users of the Site were removed from the comparison that identified the most stringent BAV calculated for each COPC In addition the occasional risk posed to Raikoad Workers was believed to be adequately addressed by the consideration of Construction Workers and Utility Workers Therefore Railroad Workers also were removed from the basis ofthe revised BAVs and recommended CUGs Since the Utility Worker risk assessment effort (see Table 1) did not include the calculation of CUGs relative to this receptor CUG spreadsheets were developed for Utility Workers using the equations and methods defined in the 2002 CUG Report and the exposure assumptions assumed in the September 2004 Utility Worker risk calculations The evaluation of risk with respect to the Utility Worker considers potential exposures to soil and contaminated groundwater that may be encountered while working in either a trench or an open excavation enviroimient
2 Consideration of Additional Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)
Summary Risk-based BAVs were calculated for 14-dioxane for each ofthe identified receptors relative to their potential exposure to impacted surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater
Discussion Based on the 5-Year Review conducted in 2004 USEPA requested that groundwater influent to the on-site groundwater treatment facility be analyzed for 14-dioxane This constituent was found to be present in the influent at levels above detection limits and therefore was subsequently included as a parameter in influent sampling In June of 2007 USEPA Region 1 determined that 14-dioxane should be included as a COPC for the Site and requested that BAVs and
2008-O-JV03-0008 3 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Subsequent to the 2002 CUG Report renewed interest in the potential risks to Utility Workers arose and the investigation of potential vapor intrusion into subsurface structures and buildings at the adjacent LIampS property continued In September of 2004 the potential for indoor inhalation and the associated risk to Utility Workers at the LIampS property was evaluated and CUGs were calculated for this receptor group (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004) In 2005 USEPA Region 1 directed that recreational use of these properties by adults as well as by children also should be evaluated Simultaneously any updates to the toxicity values that were used in the CUG development and any changes associated with updated risk assessment guidance also were to be incorporated into the development of the new values A draft of these revised and updated CUGs was submitted to USEPA Region 1 and MassDEP in late 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a 2005b) Following review USEPA Region 1 transmitted a memo to TtEC (December 6 2007) containing comments and direction regarding revisions and updates to both the BAVs and the recommended CUGs (USEAP 2007b) The principal revisions and updates related to
1 Removing the vapor intrusion component from the BAV calculations for receptors at off-property locations where that potential pathway was an assumed contributor to risk - Additional investigation and evaluation by USEPA Region I was summarized in a Memorandum by J DiLorenzo former USEPA Remedial Project Manager on the Silresim Site (USEPA November 29 2007a) concluded that there is currently not a complete Silresim Site-related indoor air exposure pathway at the BampL Auto Parts location (ie the off-property location nearest and down-gradient of the groundwater contamination other than the LIS facility that was explicitly investigated relative to possible vapor intrusion) The April 14 2008 Property Use Assessment of the LIS property similarly concluded that indoor air migration is not a complete pathway at the multiple LIS facilities In addition this assessment suggested that a periodic review of property use be performed concurrent with the annual MassDEP groundwater sampling and no less than every 5 years by USEPA Subsequently USEPA Region 1 directed that this exposure pathway not be included in the BAV calculations for these off-property receptors
2 Evaluating inhalation risk using the Reference Concentration (RfC) and Inhalation Unit Risk (lUR) toxicity factors instead of the inhalation Reference Doses (RfDs) and inhalation Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) - Supplemental federal guidance for Superfitnd inhalation risk assessment is currently being drafted to specify that this approach be applied to inhalation risk assessment at CERCLA sites In 1996 (USEPA 1996) and 2002 (USEPA 2002d) USEPA published and then updated the Soil Screening Guidance documents which implement the RfCIUR approach in developing risk-based Soil Screening Levels (SSLs) USEPA Region 1 has adopted this approach for use in inhalation risk assessments and in the development of risk-based clean-up goals The inhalation risk assessment components of the BAVs were borrowed from the corresponding components ofthe earlier baseline risk assessment which used the older approach
The remainder of this memorandum documents the cumulative set of actions that have been taken to revise and update the BAVs and CUGs since the submittal of the ESD docimient (USEPA September 2003)
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
II Revised and Updated Benclimarlc Assessment Values and Clean-Up Goals
The CUGs previously established for the surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater at the Site (as described in the 2002 CUG Report and documented in the ESD (USEPA September 2003a) were further revised and updated in various modifications as indicated above Risk-based BAVs represent the starting point of the CUG specification process The contaminant-specific BAVs are the concentration of that contaminant in a particular exposure medium that is projected to correspond to a specified target risk level to an identified receptor group exposed to that medium now or during reasonably anticipated future uses BAVs were calculated for each chemical of potential concern (COPC) based on the potential for them to cause carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effects endpoints The target excess lifetime cancer risk goal specified for individual carcinogenic COPCs was 1 x 10 and the target Hazard Index for non-carcinogenic COPCs was specified to be 1 These BAVs along with several other criteria and published standards will be considered by the Site Managers in the ultimate specification ofthe CUGs for the Site
The following summarizes the changes that were made to the inputs to our approach for calculating the BAVs as a result of the full set of cumulative comments and suggestions received from USEPA Region I during the period 2003 to 2007
1 Modification of the List of Target Receptors for the Site Relative to the Specification of CUGs
Summary Risk-based BAVs and recommended CUGs were calculated to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Utility Workers relative to the Site The BAVs that were developed previously to be protective of Railroad Workers and Aduh and Child Recreational Users were not updated and were not considered in the subsequent updated CUG development process
Discussion In discussions with USEPA Region 1 and the Site Managers it was decided that the recreational scenario was no longer a valid basis on which to develop CUGs for the Site Therefore the BAVs that were calculated for Adult and Child Recreational Users of the Site were removed from the comparison that identified the most stringent BAV calculated for each COPC In addition the occasional risk posed to Raikoad Workers was believed to be adequately addressed by the consideration of Construction Workers and Utility Workers Therefore Railroad Workers also were removed from the basis ofthe revised BAVs and recommended CUGs Since the Utility Worker risk assessment effort (see Table 1) did not include the calculation of CUGs relative to this receptor CUG spreadsheets were developed for Utility Workers using the equations and methods defined in the 2002 CUG Report and the exposure assumptions assumed in the September 2004 Utility Worker risk calculations The evaluation of risk with respect to the Utility Worker considers potential exposures to soil and contaminated groundwater that may be encountered while working in either a trench or an open excavation enviroimient
2 Consideration of Additional Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)
Summary Risk-based BAVs were calculated for 14-dioxane for each ofthe identified receptors relative to their potential exposure to impacted surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater
Discussion Based on the 5-Year Review conducted in 2004 USEPA requested that groundwater influent to the on-site groundwater treatment facility be analyzed for 14-dioxane This constituent was found to be present in the influent at levels above detection limits and therefore was subsequently included as a parameter in influent sampling In June of 2007 USEPA Region 1 determined that 14-dioxane should be included as a COPC for the Site and requested that BAVs and
2008-O-JV03-0008 3 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
II Revised and Updated Benclimarlc Assessment Values and Clean-Up Goals
The CUGs previously established for the surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater at the Site (as described in the 2002 CUG Report and documented in the ESD (USEPA September 2003a) were further revised and updated in various modifications as indicated above Risk-based BAVs represent the starting point of the CUG specification process The contaminant-specific BAVs are the concentration of that contaminant in a particular exposure medium that is projected to correspond to a specified target risk level to an identified receptor group exposed to that medium now or during reasonably anticipated future uses BAVs were calculated for each chemical of potential concern (COPC) based on the potential for them to cause carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effects endpoints The target excess lifetime cancer risk goal specified for individual carcinogenic COPCs was 1 x 10 and the target Hazard Index for non-carcinogenic COPCs was specified to be 1 These BAVs along with several other criteria and published standards will be considered by the Site Managers in the ultimate specification ofthe CUGs for the Site
The following summarizes the changes that were made to the inputs to our approach for calculating the BAVs as a result of the full set of cumulative comments and suggestions received from USEPA Region I during the period 2003 to 2007
1 Modification of the List of Target Receptors for the Site Relative to the Specification of CUGs
Summary Risk-based BAVs and recommended CUGs were calculated to be protective of CommercialIndustrial Workers Trespassers Construction Workers and Utility Workers relative to the Site The BAVs that were developed previously to be protective of Railroad Workers and Aduh and Child Recreational Users were not updated and were not considered in the subsequent updated CUG development process
Discussion In discussions with USEPA Region 1 and the Site Managers it was decided that the recreational scenario was no longer a valid basis on which to develop CUGs for the Site Therefore the BAVs that were calculated for Adult and Child Recreational Users of the Site were removed from the comparison that identified the most stringent BAV calculated for each COPC In addition the occasional risk posed to Raikoad Workers was believed to be adequately addressed by the consideration of Construction Workers and Utility Workers Therefore Railroad Workers also were removed from the basis ofthe revised BAVs and recommended CUGs Since the Utility Worker risk assessment effort (see Table 1) did not include the calculation of CUGs relative to this receptor CUG spreadsheets were developed for Utility Workers using the equations and methods defined in the 2002 CUG Report and the exposure assumptions assumed in the September 2004 Utility Worker risk calculations The evaluation of risk with respect to the Utility Worker considers potential exposures to soil and contaminated groundwater that may be encountered while working in either a trench or an open excavation enviroimient
2 Consideration of Additional Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPCs)
Summary Risk-based BAVs were calculated for 14-dioxane for each ofthe identified receptors relative to their potential exposure to impacted surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater
Discussion Based on the 5-Year Review conducted in 2004 USEPA requested that groundwater influent to the on-site groundwater treatment facility be analyzed for 14-dioxane This constituent was found to be present in the influent at levels above detection limits and therefore was subsequently included as a parameter in influent sampling In June of 2007 USEPA Region 1 determined that 14-dioxane should be included as a COPC for the Site and requested that BAVs and
2008-O-JV03-0008 3 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
CUGs be developed for this COPC CUGs were calculated for 14-dioxane for both soil and groundwater during this current effort
3 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Oral and Dermal Pathways
Summary Updated published toxicity values or specific values provided by USEPA Region 1 for certain COPCs were used in the revised BAV calculations and all of the other toxicity values that were used in the previous CUG development effort were checked and updated (if necessary) to be current with the specified hierarchy of sources
Discussion To maintain consistency between the previous CUG evaluations and the current supplemental effort the same methodology and assumptions were used except for the updated toxicological information (see the 2002 CUG Report for the previous evaluation) The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each of the COPCs were revised to reflect the most current information and hierarchy of sources The preferred hierarchy currently is
(1) the USEPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (2) the USEPA Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values (PPRTVs) and (3) Other Sources (ie CaUfomia Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registrys (ATSDR) Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) and the Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) in that order)
Discussions with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor also provided direction as to which toxicity values should be applied in order to maintain consistency with USEPA Region I protocol The non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic toxicity values for each COPC were reviewed based on the above hierarchy and regional protocols Tables 2 and 4 contain the full set of updated toxicity values for the oral and dermal pathways that were applied in the CUG development It should be noted that these tables list all the constituents that were addressed in the various risk assessments Many of these constituents subsequently did not warrant the development of CUGs The following identifies which toxicity values have been revised relative to the values presented in the November 2005 Report (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 2 and 4)
Non-Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Chlorobenzene PPRTV n-Propylbenzene USEPA (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Toluene IRIS 111 -Trichloroethane IRIS 112-Trichloroethane IRIS 14-Dioxane IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Aluminum PPRTV Barium IRIS
NOTE TTie oraldermal Reference Doses (RfDs) for 11 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Acetone Benzene 11shyDichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene 12-Dichloroethene (total) 12-Dichloropropane 1122-Tetrachloroethane Trichloroethene Xylene Thallium and alpha-BHC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Oral Dermal Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane IRIS Cadmium (food) IRIS (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD (Dioxin) CalEPA and Dioxin Reassessment
N O T E The oral Cancer Slope Factors (CSFs) for 8 COPCs had previously been updated in 2005 (Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b) relative to the values that were used in the 2002 CUG Report These were Chloroform 11-Dichloroethene 12shyDichloropropane Methyl tert-Butyl Ether Trichloroethene 14-DichIorobenzene Cadmium and Lindane USEPA Region 1 suggested the use ofthe CalEPA values for the oral CSF for both tetrachloroethene and trichloroethene The carcinogenic toxicity values for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood were verified as appropriate for this assessment for vinyl chloride by USEPA Region 1 (USEAP December 6 2007b)
4 Application of Updated Toxicity Values for the Inhalation Pathway
Summary As noted earlier (see also Item 5 below) current USEPA Region 1 policy is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented and the RfDj and CSFi values were removed from Tables 3 and 5 and were replaced with the available RfCs and lURs
Discussion The row pertaining to the Vinyl Chloride value associated with lifetime exposure from birth was removed from both Tables 3 and 5 as suggested by USEPA within General Comments 4 and noted within Specific Comments for Table 5 The lUR value for TCE was entered as 20E-06 (CalEPA) and not 17E-06 (as noted within Specific Comments for Table 5) because this is the most updated value Chronic versus Subchronic values were also footnoted and referenced accordingly (Note All changed values are shown in bold in Tables 3 and 5)
Non-Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source Acetone ATSDR Chlorobenzene PPRTV Chloroform ATSDR 12-DichIoroethane ATSDR trans-12-Dichloroethene PPRTV Methylene Chloride ATSDR n-Propylbenzene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene ATSDR Toluene IRIS 14-Dioxane (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 123-Trichlorobenzene NCEA 124-Trichlorobenzene NCEA Aluminum PPRTV Barium HEAST C10-C22 Aromatics MassDEP
NOTE 124-Trichloroben2ene was used as a surrogate for 123-Trichlorobenzene with respect to assigning toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superflind Technical Support Center
2008-O-JV03-0008 5 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Cancer Inhalation Toxicity Value Changes Since 2005
COPC New Source 11 -Dichloroethene (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) Tetrachloroethene CalEPA Trichloroethene CalEPA and USEPA (2 values used) 14-Dioxane CalEPA Nickel IRIS 44^-DDE CalEPA Lindane (gamma-BHC) (Now Unquantified - No Value Supported) 2378-TCDD HEAST
N O T E The carcinogenic toxicity value for vinyl chloride published for continuous lifetime exposure during adulthood was used for this assessment
5 Evaluation of Inhalation Risk On the Basis of Exposure Using RfC and lUR Toxicity Values
Summary As indicated earlier current USEPA Region 1 policy (USEPA 2007b) is to evaluate inhalation exposure and risk using the airborne exposure approach and RfC and lUR toxicity values To reflect this policy this calculation approach was implemented for both non-cancer and cancer equations for the appropriate surface soil subsurface soil and groundwater exposure pathways (as illustrated in Appendix A)
Discussion The inhalation intake equations were rewritten for all receptors assumed to have inhalation intake from the surface soil subsurface soil or groundwater The appropriate exposure-based toxicity values were incorporated into these new relationships
6 Modification of the Application of Particulate Emission Factors (PEFs) and Volatilization Factors (VFs) for the Soil-to-Air Pathways
Summary The updated approach for applying either a PEF or a VF (but not both) to address the potential inhalation risk due to COPCs via the soil-to-air exposure pathways was systematically apphed The decision as to whether to utilize a PEF or a VF was based on the COPCs Henrys Law Constant and Molecular Weight A default PEF value consistent with the USEPAs Soil Screening Guidance was applied for the Trespasser and the CommercialIndustrial Worker receptors while a published PEF more suitable to dusty conditions during construction and excavation was applied for the Construction Worker and Utility Worker receptors
Discussion VFs were calculated and applied for those constituents that were detected in the soil that are identified as sufficiently volatile in the Draft Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance (USEPA 2002c) Table 1 This Guidance considers a chemical to be volatile if its Henrys Law Constant is greater than or equal to 1 x 10 atm- m mole and its Molecular Weight is less than 200 gramsmole If a VF value was calculated it was used in the intake estimation even if a PEF was also available as the volatilization mechanism generally leads to greater exposure than through particulate inhalation in these cases
Table 6 presents the assessment of whether a surface or subsurface soil COPC was sufficiently volatile (requiring the application of a VF) For those COPCs that did not meet these criteria receptor-specific PEFs were applied instead For Trespassers and CommercialIndustrial Workers
2008-O-JV03-0008 6 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
the default USEPA PEF value of 132 x 10 m kg (USEPA 2002c) was used This value replaced the Site-specific PEF that was developed for the 2002 CUG calculations The calculated PEF value from 2002 was re-evaluated and judged to reflect an airborne dust scenario that is too conservative (ie too dusty) for the anticipated exposures of these two receptors A PEF of 170 x 10 mVkg was used for the Construction and Utility Workers This value the same as was used in the development ofthe 2002 CUGs was published by the US Department of Energy to apply to construction work in an envirotmient with a heavy dust loading (ie 600 ugm^) This PEF value remains comparable to other approaches used to address exposures associated with soil excavation
7 Updating of the Lead Exposure Analysis
Summary Regional rather than national input parameters were applied in the Adult Lead Model evaluations performed for Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers and Construction Workers and the potential exposure of Utihty Workers to lead in soil was reassessed in light of USEPAs Intermittent Exposure Guidance
Discussion The original (2002) calculations (Foster Wheeler 2002) performed using the Adult Lead Model made use of default assumptions for two input parameters based on a relatively unspecified homogeneous exposed adult population These two parameters were the geometric mean blood lead level in women of child-bearing age in the absence ofany Site exposure to lead and the corresponding geometric standard deviation of this blood lead concentration in this group More specific subpopulation characteristics are now available for these parameters These parameters may be specified by region ofthe US and by race or ethnicity
In accordance with USEPA Region 1 direction the values for these parameters identified for a Non-Hispanic White population in the Northeast Region of the United States were adopted for the reevaluation These substitutions resulted in more stringent BAVs for lead for CommercialIndustrial Workers (see Table 7) Construction Workers (see Table 8) and Trespassers (see Table 9) As the exposure frequency for Utility Workers was assumed to be only 5 days per year (ie less than the minimum 90 days required to apply the Adult Lead Model) the USEPA guidance Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003b) was consulted The decision tree presented in Figure 1 of that Guidance Document indicated that the lead exposure to Utility Workers could not be considered appropriately using the Adult Lead Model and that the exposure was sufficiently short and intermittent that it did not warrant further evaluation
8 Application of Updated Guidance-Based Modeling Parameters and Regulatory Standards
SummaryDiscussion Since the development of the CUGs in 2002 and their revision in 2005 USEPA and MassDEP have released new or updated guidance or regulatory standards on a variety of exposure toxicity or risk assessment aspects Two examples are the USEPAs updated RAGS Part E (Dermal Guidance) and the Wave Two revisions to the MassDEP Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Method 1 Standards and Upper Concentration Limits The new or updated guidance or standards applicable to the CUG development were checked for modified parameter values or newly recommended assumptions and approaches Any identified differences from past site-specific protocols were discussed with the USEPA Region 1 Risk Assessor and were incorporated into the updated BAV calculations when directed
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
After all of these modifications and refinements were incorporated into the linked BAV calculation spreadsheets new BAVs were generated for each receptor exposure pathway and exposure medium combination It should be emphasized that the exposure parameters for the evaluated receptors were not changed from their original values and the target individual chemical risk goals also were not changed (ie a target excess lifetime cancer risk of 1x10 and a target Hazard Index for non-carcinogens of I were applied)
Appendix A presents a set of sample calculations of the BAVs for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health endpoints for the following cases
bull BAVs for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a CoimnercialIndustrial Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker bull BAVs for Trichloroethene in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker
Further details on these and the remaining COPCs exposure media receptors that were addressed for this Site can be foimd in the 2002 CUG Report (specifically in Appendices F and G) Tables 10 through 12 present the recalculated BAVs for each appropriate receptor for the surface soil subsurface soil and groimdwater respectively
Table 10 presents the surface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Trespassers CommercialIndustrial Workers Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptors relative to the surface soil also is identified in Table 10 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV The most stringent BAVs were all associated with either CommercialIndustrial Workers (9 of 17 COPCs) or Construction Workers (7 of 17 COPCs) Depending on the carcinogenistic toxicity value assumed for trichloroethene the most stringent BAV is either associated with the Commercial Industrial Worker or the Construction Worker It should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 10 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 11 presents the subsurface soil BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers and Utility Workers with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of both of these receptors relative to the subsurface soil also is identified in Table 11 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV Nearly all of the most stringent BAVs were all associated with Construction Workers (23 of 24 COPCs) Only one COPC (12-dichloroethane) had a more stringent BAV for the Utility Worker scenario Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene and for 2378-TCDD reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
Table 12 presents the groundwater BAVs calculated to be protective of Construction Workers (in either a deep trench or an open excavation) and Utility Workers (in a trench) with respect to both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints The lowest (ie most stringent) BAV that is projected to be protective of all of these receptorexposure situation combinations relative to the groundwater also is identified in Table 12 for each COPC as is the receptor and health effect type associated with the most stringent BAV All of the most stringent BAVs were associated with Construction Workers (23 of 23 calculated COPC values) Two COPCs (cis-l2-dichIoroethene and lead) do not have calculated BAV values due to lack of available data Again it should be noted that two sets of BAV calculations are shown in Table 11 for trichloroethene reflecting different assumptions about toxicity
2008-O-JV03-0008 8 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
Tables 10 through 12 also present additional chemical-specific information to provide a context for the calculated BAV values relative to the specification of CUGs Tables 10 and II for the surface and subsurface soil respectively present the site-specific background concentrations for COPCs in each medium There are no site-specific background data shown for groundwater in Table 12 Where available the mean 95 percent upper confidence limit on the mean and maximum detected concentrations of that COPC from the background soil data sets are shown The practical quantitation limits (PQLs) for each COPC in each exposure medium also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 In addition Tables 10 and 11 list relevant regulatory policy criteria for 2378-TCDD (dioxin) in soil
As was described in the 2002 CUG Report recommended site-specific CUGs were developed using the calculated BAVs through the following process
Step A The lowest (most stringent) BAV was identified for each COPC for each exposure medium in consideration of both carcinogenic andor non-carcinogenic health effect endpoints relative to all ofthe identified receptor scenarios for that exposure medium
Step B If the COPC was a naturally occurring or ubiquitous chemical in the vicinity of the site then the risk-based BAV identified in Step A was compared to the applicable background concentration of that COPC in that exposure medium (if available) If the risk-based BAV value identified in Step A was lower than the applicable background value the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward from the BAV value to match that background level Otherwise the risk-based BAV value from Step A was carried forward in the CUG development process [NOTE The mean background concentration was used as the applicable background concentration for this effort (as it was in the 2002 CUG Report) A more appropriate measure to use in the specification of the CUGs for naturally occurring COPCs like arsenic and lead would be an upper percentile estimate ofthe background concentration ofthe COPC in that medium (ie not the sampled mean or the 95 percent-ile estimate ofthe mean) This upper percentile value would likely be somewhat less than the available maximum detected background level shown]
Step C The recommended CUG value identified in Step B was then compared to the PQL for that COPC in that exposure medium Ifthe recommended CUG value identified in Step B was lower than the PQL the recommended CUG value was adjusted upward to match the PQL Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step B was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step D At this point certain policy criteria established for a COPC in a similar exposure setting were adopted as the recoimnended CUG value if directed by USEPA Region 1 This step only came into play for 2378-TCDD in soil Otherwise the recommended CUG value from Step C was carried forward in the CUG specification process
Step E The recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each soil COPC were then compared to their Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) Upper Concentration Limits (UCLs) for soil in Tables 10 and 11 Due to the potential for groundwater at the site to discharge into nearby River Meadow Brook the recommended CUG values identified in Step D for each groundwater COPC were compared to their respective MCP groundwater UCLs and also to their respective MCP Method 1 GW-3 standards Table 12 presents the results of these comparisons The lowest value from either Step D or Step E was shown in Tables 10 through 12 as the Recommended Site-Specific CUG for that COPC
2008-O-JV03-0008 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
The CUGs presented in the ESD Report (USEPA September 2003) also are shown in Tables 10 through 12 for purposes of comparison Since 2003 Table 10 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 4 COPCs decreased for 2 COPCs and did not change for 10 COPCs One new COPC 14-dioxane now has a recommended surface soil CUG Table 11 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific CUG values increased for 21 COPCs decreased for I COPC and did not change for I COPC Once again there is a newly developed Recommended Site-Specfic CUG for 14-dioxane in the subsurface soil Table 12 shows that the Recommended Site-Specific groundwater CUG values increased for 13 COPCs decreased for 7 COPC and did not change for 4 COPCs Again a new CUG was calculated for 14-dioxane in groundwater
2008-O-JV03-0008 10 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
REFERENCES
Foster Wheeler 2001 Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts May
Foster Wheeler 2002 Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals Sibesim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts January
Foster Wheeler 2003 Recommended Clean-Up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site based on Discussions during the Sih-esim Site Meeting September
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2004 Risk Evaluation for the Ufility Worker on Lowell Iron amp Steel Property Assuming Worst-Case Contamination Conditions September 31
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005a Draft Update ofthe Sikesim Superfiind Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) June
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2005b Draft Update of the Silresim Superftmd Site Clean Up Goals (CUGs) November
Tetra Tech FW Inc 2006 2006 MCP Amendment Impacts and Comparison of EPAMassDEP Exposure Factors - Silresim Superfund Site April
USEPA 1996 Soil Screening Guidance Users Guide USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Publication 93554-23 EPA540R-960I8 July
USEPA 2002a Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 ofthe National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) OSWER 92857shy52 March
USEPA 2002b Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) Federal Register November 29 2002 Volume 67 Number 230 Page 71169-71172
USEPA 2002c Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater and Soils (Subsurface Vapor Intrusion Guidance) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA 530-F-02-052 November
USEPA 2002d Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites (1996 Soil Screening Guidance Revision) USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response OSWER 93554-24 December
USEPA 2003a Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superfiind Site Lowell MA USEPA Region I - New England Boston MA September
USEPA 2003b Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposures at Lead Sites USEPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response EPA-540-R-03-008 OSWER 92857-76 November
USEPA 2007a Memorandum from Jim DiLorenzo USEPA Region 1 RPM to Site File through Bob Cianciarulo USEPA Region 1 Chief of MA Superftmd Section and Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Assessment of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superfund Site Lowell MA December 3
2008-O-JV03-0008 l l 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
USEPA 2007b Memorandum from Chau Vu USEPA Region 1 Human Health Risk Assessor to Dan Keefe USEPA Region I RPM Comments on the Draft 2007 Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation for the Silresim Superfund Site (dated October 31 2007) December 6
2008-O-JV03-0008 12 5108
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation Silresim Superfund Site
TABLES
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1978-1982
1983-1984
1984
1986
March 1990
September 19 1991
February 1999
May 2001
June 8 2001
TITLE Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action Emergency Response Remedial Action
Final Draft Remedial Investigation Report for the Silresim Superfund Site Lowell Massachusetts shyVolume I Chapter 700 Public Health Risk and Environmental Assessment
Record of Decision
ROD Remedy Review for the Silresim Superfund Site
Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site
MADE Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site
DESCRIPTION Fenced the Site perimeter and removed approximately 30000 drums and tanks containing waste Demolished on-site buildings aboveground tanks and capped the Site Crushed stone was placed over surficial soil contamination in three areas adjacent to the Site Extended the Site perimeter fencing in the southeastern comer to enclose an area of surficial soil contamination and placed cmshed stone over surficial soil contamination in other areas Baseline risk assessment Human health receptors considered were Residents Trespassers Commercial Workers Utility (sewer) Workers and BampM Railroad Workers Ecological receptors considered were River Meadow Brook East Pond and the BampM Railroad Area The results led to a focus on indoor air quality in the buildings on the Lowell Iron amp Steel Property
Record of Decision signed for the Silresim Superftmd Site In most cases the groundwater clean-up goals linked directly or indirectly to achieving drinking water standards Evaluation ofthe remedial actions taken at the Site since the 1991 Record of Decision Review highlighted issues and changes associated with groundwater use and groundwater value determination (as a non-drinking water supply) leaching potential activity and use limitations linked to land reuse refinements in vapor migration modeling updated extent of contamination (soil and groundwater) a new chemical of concern screening process updated toxicity values and updated risk assessment policies and procedures Implemented the findings ofthe 5-Year ROD Remedy Review Evaluated a CommercialIndustrial Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groundwater) Construction Worker (exposure to surface soil subsurface soil groimdwater) BampM Railroad Worker (exposure to surface soil) and Adolescent Trespasser (exposure to surface soil) Calculated risk-based clean-up goals for target risk levels of 1 x 10 and 01 No Utility Worker addressed in this analysis based on earlier EPAMADEP Site Manager discussions with representatives ofthe municipal utility
Reference to an USEPA and MADEP meeting on May 23 with a party who had shown interest in developing the Silresim property for recreational use Potential for recreational reuse considered to exist MADEP requested that USEPA revise the risk assessment to address this potential use Recreational Child receptor selected because of anticipated greater exposure than for a Recreational Adult receptor (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe ultimate clean-up goals)
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE 1 August 13
2001
1 August 14 2001
November 2001
December 20 2001
January 2002
March 19 2003
May 14-15 2003
September 2003
October 2004
November 30 2004 June 29 and November 5 2005
TITLE USEPA Comments on the Draft Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfiind Site Draft Results for the Surface Soil Benchmark Assessment Value Development for Recreational Land Use
Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site USEPA Comments on the Draft Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superfund Site Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Memorandum on Summary of Teleconference Call on the Off-Silresim Non-VOC Soil Excavation Estimates and a Proposal to Refine the Excavation Boundaries and Quantities Using a Projected Residual Risk Calculation Approach Risk Calculation Tasks to Support the ROD Amendment (as discussed at the Project Meeting of 514shy152003)
Explanation of Significant Differences for the Silresim Chemical Corporation Superftmd Site Indoor Air Vapor Intmsion Assessment
Scope of Work
Draft Update ofthe Silresim Superfiand Site Clean-Up Goals
DESCRIPTION Included MADEP comments MADEP questioned why no risk-based clean-up goals were calculated for the Sewer Workers Potential redevelopment ofthe property for an energy facility was noted Clean-up goals were developed for surface soil assuming a child recreational receptor modeled after a possible fiiture user of an athletic field (Results incorporated into the revised Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Clean-up Goals for the Silresim Superftmd Site Report Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Included MADEP comments Minor comments to clarify aspects of the groundwater-to-surface water connection and the vapor intrasion modeling performed
Incorporated the previously identified updates revisions
Discussion of a risk-based approach for reducing the required excavation footprint
Various alternatives were to be explored (1) changing the risk-based clean-up goals to 1x10 and 10 (2) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to excavation and the Constmction Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals and (3) seeing what effect Activity and Use Limitations relative to indoor air vapor intrasion and fhe CommercialIndustrial Worker would have on the ultimate clean-up goals Incorporated revised clean-up goals reflecting groundwater reclassification updated calculations and receptors (Note Recreational land use clean-up levels were not included in the selection ofthe clean-up goals) Summary exposure and risk evaluation using the results of the indoor air sampling performed in relation to the Lowell Iron amp Steel Buildings on July 21 1999 April 26 2000 April 20 2001 and April 17 2002 Update the clean-up goals using recently revised toxicity 1 values and EPA Region 1 policies Update ofthe revised clean-up goals to also consider the 1 exposure to a Utility Worker and Adult Recreational User updated toxicity values and reassessment ofthe factors in going from risk-based Baseline assessment values to cleanshyup goals
2008-O-JV03-0008
1
TABLE 1 CHRONOLOGY OF SILRESIM SITE RISK ASSESSMENTMANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
DATE December 3 2007
February 19 2008
TITLE Assessment ofthe Vapor Intmsion Pathway and Related Inspection of BampL Used Auto Parts - Silresim Superftmd Site Lowell MA
Supplemental Clean-Up Goal Evaluation
DESCRIPTION Documentation of an inspection ofthe BampL Used Auto Parts property Summary ofthe indoor airvapor intmsion assessments performed relative to the Silresim Site during the period 1999 to 2003 Concluded that current conditions did not warrant a ftill assessment of potential vapor intrasion at this facility Updated and revised the prior draft benchmark assessment values (BAVs) and clean-up goals to reflect current toxicity values removing the Railroad Worker as a target receptor adding 14-dioxane removing the vapor phase inhalation pathway updated lead modeling applying the inhalation exposure assessment approach other current risk assessment guidance and current regulatory criteria
2008-O-JV03-0008
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
- shyChemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal
Concern RfD (2)
Acetone Chronic 900E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-01 MGKG-DAY
Benzene Chronic 400E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-03 MGKG-DAY
2-Bulanone Chronic 600E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY
Chlorobenzene Subchronic (19) 700E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 700E-02 MGKG-DAY
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
11-Dichloroethane Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA
11-Dichloroethene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloroethene (total) Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
cis-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 100E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
trans-12-Dichloroethene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY
12-Dichloropropane Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY
Ethylbenzene Chronic 1 OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
Hexachlorobutadiene Chronic 200E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-04 MGKG-DAY
Isopropylbenzene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
4-lsopropyltoluene Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY
^ethylene Chloride Chronic 600E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether NA NA NA NA NA NA
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
1122-Tetrachloroethane Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 400E-02 MGKG-DAY
Tetrachloroethene Chronic 1 OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY
Toluene Chronic 800E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-02 MGKG-DAY
111 -Trichloroethane Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 200E+00 MGKG-DAY
112-Trichloroethane Chronic 400E03 MGKG-DAY 100 400E03 MGKG-DAY
Trichloroethene Chronic 300E-04 MKG-DAY 100 300E-04 MGKG-DAY
124-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
135-Trimethylbenzene Chronic 500E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 500E-02 MGKG-DAY
Vinyl Chloride Chronic 300E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-03 MGKG-DAY
Xylene (total) Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY
Primary
Target
Organ
Kidney
White Blood Cells
Developmental
Liver
NA
Liver
None
NA
Liver
NA
NA
Liver
Liver
Liver and Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Kidney
Liver
Liver Kidney and Whole Body
NA
NA
Red blood cells and Liver
Respiratory
Liver
Kidney
Reduced Body
Weight
Liver
NA
NA
NA
Liver
Increased mortality
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
1000
300
1000
300
NA
100
None
NA
100
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
3000
NA
NA
1000
1000
1000
3000
1000
1000
NA
NA
NA
30
1000
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV
NA
IRIS
PPRTV (13)
PPRTV
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
HEAST
IRIS
IRIS (4)
IRIS
HEAST
NA
USEPA (12)
IRIS
ATSDR
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
USEPA (1217)
USEPA (12)
USEPA (12)
IRIS (18)
IRIS
Dates of RfD
Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
091807
091807
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
NA
091807
091707
091707
091807
051805
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
073197
NA
5122005
091807
080196
091807
091807
042308
042308
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
1 Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
Chemical Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
of Potential RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
Concern
Acenaphthylene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807
Benzo(a)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(ghi)perylene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3enzo(k)fluoranthene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthalate Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
Chrysene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
3ibenz(ah)anthracene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-O2 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene Chronic 900E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 900E-02 MGKG-DAY None 1000 IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 14-Oloxane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobenzene Chronic 800E-04 MGKG-DAY 100 800E-04 MGKG-DAY Liver 100 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 3000 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone Chronic 200E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-01 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2-Methylnaphthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-02 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS (5) 091807 1
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
^Japhthalene Chronic 200E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 200E-O2 MGKG-DAY Body weight 3000 IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY None 3000 IRIS (7) 091807
Phenol Chronic 300E-01 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-01 MGKG-DAY Body weight 300 IRIS 091807
Pyridine Chronic 100E-03 MGKG-DAY 100 1 OOE-03 MGKG-DAY Liver 1000 IRIS 091807
123-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS (10) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene Chronic 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY 100 1OOE-02 MGKG-DAY Kidney 1000 IRIS 091807
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
A luminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium Cadmium (food)
Cadmium (water)
Chromium (total)
Copper
ead
Ulanganese Mercury
Mickel Selenium
rhallium Vanadium
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
3eta-BHC delta-BHC
Chlordane
4^ -DDE Endosulfan sulfate
-leptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Jndane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
Chronic
Subchronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic NA
NA
Chronic NA
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
Chronic
NA
Oral RfD
Value
100E+00
400E-04
300E-04
200E-01
200E-03
100E-03 500E-04
300E-03
NA NA
140E-01
300E-04
200E-02
500E-03
800E-05
700E-03
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03
NA
NA 500E-04
NA 600E-03 500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Oral RfD
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
NA MGKG-DAY
NA MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Oral to Dermal Adjustment Factor (1)
100
15
100
7
1
3
5 3 NA
NA
4
7
4 100
100
3
100
100
100
100
100
100 NA
NA
100 NA
100
100
100
100
NA
Adjusted
Dermal
RfD (2)
100E+00
600E-05 300E-04
140E-02
140E-05
250E-05
250E-05 750E-05
NA
NA 560E-03
210E-05
800E-04
500E-03 800E-05 182E-04
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
200E-05
300E-05
800E-03 NA NA
500E-04
NA
600E-03
500E-04
130E-05
300E-04
NA
Units
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
NA NA
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY NA
NA
MGKG-DAY NA
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
MGKG-DAY
NA
Primary
Target
Organ
Neurotoxicity Developmental
Longevity
Skin
Kidney
Small Intestine
Proteinuria
Proteinuria None NA
NA
CNS
Autoimmune OrganBody weight
Selenosis
None NA
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Eye Keratin Immune System
Liver
Liver
NA NA
Liver NA
Body weight
Liver
Liver
LiverKidney
NA
Combined
UncertaintyModifying
Factors
100
1000
3
300
300
10
10
900 NA
NA 1
1000 300
3
3000 100
300
300
300
300
1000
100 NA NA
300
NA
100
300
1000
1000
NA
Sources of RfD
Target Organ
PPRTV
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS (8) NA
NA
IRIS
IRIS (9)
IRIS IRIS
IRIS (16) HEAST
IRIS (11)
IRIS (11)
IRIS
IRIS (11)
IRIS
ATSDR NA
NA IRIS
NA
IRIS (14)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
Dates of RfD Target Organ (3)
(MMDDYY)
9172007
091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
091807 091807
NA
NA 091807
091807
091807 091807
091807
073197
091807
091807
091807
091807
091807
052405
NA
NA 091807
NA 091807
091807
091807
091807
NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 3 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable51
TABLE 2 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Chronic Oral RfD Oral RfD Oral to Dermal Adjusted Units Primary Combined Sources of RfD Dates of RfD
of Potential Subchronic Value Units Adjustment Factor (1) Dermal Target UncertaintyModifying Target Organ Target Organ (3)
Concern RfD (2) Organ Factors (MMDDYY)
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C19 -C3 6 Aliphatics Chronic 200E+00 MGKG-DAY 100 600E+00 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C5 - C8 Aliphatics Chronic 400E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-02 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I O Aromatics Chronic 300E-02 MGKG-DAY 100 300E-02 MGKG-OAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics Chronic 1OOE-01 MGKG-DAY 100 600E-01 MGKG-DAY NA NA MassDEP (15) 10312002
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Infonnation System ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (I) Refer to RAGS Part E Exhibit 41 (USEPA 2001)
^ laquo y D bdquo [ ^ ^ _ j J = laquo D o [ ^ ^ ^ J OraloDerbdquoAdjbdquosnebdquoFbdquoaor
(3) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Naphthalene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (6) Pyrene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) Anthracene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (9) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (10) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center ( I I ) Aroclor 1254 toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (12) Values obtained from EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (13) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (14) Endosulfan toxicological information used based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (15) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implementation of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31 (16) Thallium(l)Sulfate used as a surrogate as per USEPA Risk Assessor (17) For trichloroethene the oral RfD value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Characterization (External Review Draft) 2001 (18) For vinyl chloride the oral RfD value is the subchronic value for an adult
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 4 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable51
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyModifying RfCiRfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugm3) (MMDDYY)
Acetona 130E04 CNS 100 ATSDR 122107 3enzene 300E-01 White BloocJ Cells 300 IRIS 121707 2-Butanone 500E+03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707 Chlorobenzene SOOE-t-lll Liver Kidney 1000 PPRTV 91707
Chloroethane 100E04 Fetus Bones 300 IRIS 121707
Chloroform 992E+01 Liver 100 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethane 500E-02 Kidney 1000 HEAST 073197
12Dichloroethlaquone 247E1-03 Liver 90 ATSDR 122107
11-Dichloroethene 2 OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
12-Oichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA NA
as-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA
trangt-12-Dlchloroethene 600Elaquo01 Lungs 3000 PPRTV 091707
12-Dichloropropane 400E+00 Nose 300 IRIS 121707
ithylbenzene 1 OOE-03 Developmental 300 IRIS 121707
-texachlorobutadiene NA NA NA NA NA
sopropyltwnzene 400E02 Kklney 1000 IRIS 121707
4-lsopropyltoiuene 400E-02 Kidney 1000 IRIS (3) 121707
Methylene Chloride 106E-03 Liver 30 ATSDR 122107
4-Melhyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 3 00E03 Fetus 300 IRIS 121707
^ethyl-tert-butyl ether 300E-03 Liver Kidney 100 IRIS 121707
1-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene 1OOE-03 CNS 30 IRIS 121707
1122-Totrachloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Tetrachloroethene 2 76E-02 CNS 100 ATSDR 12212007
Toluene S O O E - F O J CNS 10 IRIS 121707
111-Trichloroethane 220E-03 Neurotoxicity NA PPRTV 051205
112-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA NA
Trichloroethene 400E-01 NA NA USEPA (45) 051205
124-Trimethyltraquon2ene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
135-Triniethylbenzene 600E-00 NA NA USEPA (4) 051205
Vinyl ChioricJe 1OOE-02 Liver 30 IRIS 121707
jxylene (total) 1OOE-02 Motor Coordination 300 IRIS 121707
Acenaphthylene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707
3enzo(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(b)f1uoranthene NA NA NA NA NA
3enzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA NA
Jenzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA NA 1 3is(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA NA
200e-OOV03-0008 TablB3-12-24-07xlsTablB3
TABLE 3 NON-CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Value Primary Combined Sources of Dates of RfC of Potential Inhalation Target UncertaintyT^odifying RfCiFtfD and RfD
Concern RfC(1) Organ Factors Target Organ Target Organ (2) (ugfmS) (MMDOYY)
Whole Body - Decreased 12-Otchlorobenzene 200E-02 1000 HEAST 073197
Weight Gain
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA 14-Dichlorobenzene 800E-02 Liver 100 IRIS 121707 14-Dloxane NA NA NA NA NA Hexachlorobenzene NA NA NA NA NA indeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA NA sophorone NA NA NA NA NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS (6) 121707 4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA NA Maphthalene 300E-00 Nose 3000 IRIS 121707 Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA NA Phenol NA NA NA NA NA Pyridine NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzena 4 OOE-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
124-Trichlorobenzane 400E-00 Liver 1000 NCEA 100107
Aluminum 500E-00 Psychomotor 300 PPRTV 9172007 Antiriiony NA NA NA NA NA Arsenic NA NA NA NA NA Barium 500E-01 Fetus 1000 HEAST 12C107 Beryllium 2 OOE-02 Lung 10 IRIS 121707 Cadmium (food) NA NA NA NA NA Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA NA Chromium (total) 1OOE-01 Lung 300 IRIS (7) 121707 Copper NA NA NA NA NA Lead NA NA NA NA NA Manganese 500E-02 CNS 1000 IRIS 121707 Mercury 300E-01 CNS 30 IRIS (8) 121707 Nickel 900E-02 Respiratory 30 ATSDR 090303 Selenium NA NA NA NA NA Thallium NA NA NA NA NA Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA
Arockir-1242 NA NA NA NA NA Arodor-1248 NA NA NA NA NA Aroclor-1254 NA NA NA NA tMA
Arockgtr-1260 NA NA NA NA NA
Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA alpha-BHC NA NA NA NA NA Deta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA
aelta-BHC NA NA NA NA NA 3htordane 700E-01 Liver 1000 IRIS 121707 4-4--DDE NA NA NA NA NA Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA NA -leptachlor NA NA NA NA NA ieptachlor Epoxkte NA NA NA NA tltA
Jndane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDD NA NA NA NA NA
C10 - C22 Aromatics SOOE-rOI NA NA MassDEP (9) 103102 C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA t^A 5 - C8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C I O Aromatics NA NA NA NA NA
9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
3 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systefn ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Healtti and Hazand Assessment Toxicity Critena Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables MassOEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Pnatectkin NCEA = Nabonal Center for Environmental Technical Support Center PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value USEPA = US Environmental Pnatection Agency (1) All listed values relate to chronic exposure (2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For NCEA values this ts the date of the article provkJed by NCEA For PPRTV values this is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) Isopropyltjenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Values obtained from EPA Superfurnj Technical Support Center (5) For trichloroethene the inhialation RfC value is from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment Synthesis and Ctiaracterizatkin (External Review Draft) 2001
(6) Napthtalene was used as a sunogate for toxicological values (7) Hexavalent chromium toxicological information used (6) Elemental n^ercury toxicological values were used (9) MADEP 2002 Characterizing Risks Posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites Implemenlatkin of MADEP VPHEPH Approach October 31
200e-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table3-12-24-07xlsnable3
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - OFiAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral 10 Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Benzene 550E-02 100 550E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 1OOE-02 100 1 OOE-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethane NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethane 910E-02 100 9 iaE -02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
11-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
12-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA D IRIS (3) 091807
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
trans-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 360E-02 100 360E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobutadiene 780E-02 100 780E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (4) 091807
Methylene Chloride 750E-03 100 750E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 180E-03 100 180E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 200E-01 100 200E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 051305
Tetrachloroethene 540EO1 100 540E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 122107
Toluene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
111-Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA D IRIS 3112005
112-Trichloroethane 570E-02 100 570E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 031105
Trichloroethene 130E42 100 130E02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA (11) 122107
124-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 720E-01 100 720E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS (5) 091807
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 5 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope
of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
3enzo(a)anthracene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(a)pyrene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS (6) 091807
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA IRIS 091807
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 730E-02 100 730E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRTS(6) 091807
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 140E-02 100 140E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Chrysene 730E-03 100 730E-03 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenz(ah)anthracene 730E+00 100 730E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Dibenzofuran NA N7A NA NA D IRIS 091807
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
14-Dichlorobenzene 540E-03 100 540E-O3 (MGKG-DAY)-1 NA CalEPA 091907
14-Dioxane 110E-02 100 110E-02 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
Hexachlorobenzene 160E+00 100 160E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 B2 IRIS 091807
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene 730E-01 100 730E-01 (MGKG-DAY)-1 82 IRIS (6) 091807
Isophorone 950E-04 100 950E-04 (MGKG-DAY)-1 C IRIS 091807
2Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA C IRIS 091807
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Phenol NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
[pyridine NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA D IRIS (7) 091807
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA N T A NA D IRIS 091807
Aluminum NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 150E+00 100 150E+00 (MGKG-DAY)-1 A IRIS 091807
Barium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Beryllium NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (food) NA NA NA TA B1 IRIS 091807
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA B1 IRIS 091807
Chromium (total) NA NA NA NA A IRIS 091807
Copper NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Lead NA I^A NA NA 82 IRIS 091807
Manganese NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Mercury NA NA NA NA C IRIS (8) 091807
Mickel NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Selenium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Thallium NA NA NA NA D IRIS 091807
Vanadium NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 6 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07 xlsTabie61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA - ORALDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical
of Potential
Concern
Aroclor-1242
Aroclor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
Chlordane
4-4-DDE
Endosulfan sulfate
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Lindane (gamma-BHC)
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics
C19-C36 Aliphatics
C5 - C8 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I O Aromatics
C 9 - C I 2 Aliphatics
C 9 - C I 8 Aliphatics
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350Y0V
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Oral to Dermal
Adjustment
Factor
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
NA
100
100
NA
100
100
100
100
100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Adjusted Dermal
Cancer Slope Factor (1)
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
200E+00
170E+01
630E+00
180E+00
NA
350E-01
340E-01
NA
450E+00
910E+00
110E+00
130E+05
100E+06
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Units
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
(MGKG-DAY)-1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Cancer Guideline
Description
B2
B2
B2
B2
82
82
C
D
82
82
NA
82
B2
82
-B2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Source
Target Organ
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
USEPA (9)
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
IRIS
NA
IRIS
IRIS
CaiEPA
CalEPA
Dioxin Reassessment (10)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Date of Slope
Factor (2)
(MMDDYY)
051205
051205
051205
051205
091807
091807
091807
9182007
9182007
9182007
NA
9182007
091807
091907
091907
090100
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2008-O-JV03-00O8 Page 7 of 8 Tables 5amp6 07xlsTable61
TABLE 4 CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ ORAUDERMAL
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Oral Cancer Slope Factor Oral to Dermal Adjusted Dermal Source Date of Slope of Potential Adjustment Cancer Slope Factor (1) Units Cancer Guideline Target Organ Factor (2)
Concern Factor Description (MMDDYY)
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation data IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System EPA Group ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Minimal Risk Levels A - Human carcinogen CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database 81 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates that limited human data are available HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables B2 - Probable human carcinogen - indicates sufficient evidence in animals and MassDEP= Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection inadequate or no evidence in humans PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value C - Possible human carcinogen
D - Not classifiable as a human carcinogen (1) SFc [ V H kg - day j E - Evidence of noncarcinogenicity
SFr laquolaquo k g -day ) 1 ( j bdquo bdquo Ogrbdquo AdJuslmenI Factor
(2) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this Is the date of the provisional value was confirmed
(3) cis-12-Dichloroethene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (4) Isopropylbenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (5) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (6) 8enzo(a)pyrene toxic equivalency factors applied to slope factor based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (7) 124-Trichlorobenzene used as a surrogate for toxicological values based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (8) Mercuric chloride toxicological information used (9) Value based on consultation with EPA Superfund Technical Support Center (10) Proposed value in USEPAs Draft Dioxin Reassessment 2000 (11) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (40E-01 mgkg-day) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (lisl
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 8 of 8 Tables 5amp6_07xlsTable61
- laquo ^
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA ~ INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chetnical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Acetone NA NA NA NA
Benzene 780E-06 A IRIS 121707
2-Butanone NA NA NA NA
Chlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
Chloroethane NA NA NA NA
Chloroform 230E-O5 B2 IRIS 121707
11-DichloTOethane NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloroethane 260E-05 B2 IRIS 121707
11-Oichlaroethene NA NA NA NA
ll 2-Dichloroethene (total) NA NA NA NA
cis-12-Dichloroethene NA NA NA NA
trans-12-Dichlon3ethene NA NA NA NA
12-Dichloropropane 100E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
Ethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Hexachlorobutadiene 220E-a5 C IRIS 121707
Isopropylbenzene NA NA NA NA
4-lsopropyltoluene NA NA NA NA
Methylene Chloride 470E-07 B2 IRIS 121707
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA NA NA NA
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 260E-07 NA CalEPA 121707
n-Propylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Styrene NA NA NA NA
1122-Tetrachloroethane 580E-05 C IRIS 121707
Tetrachloroethene 590E-06 NA CalEPA 121707
Toluene NA NA NA NA
111 -Trichloroethane NA NA NA NA
112-Trichloroethane 160E-05 C IRIS 121707
Trichloroethene 200E-06 NA CalEPA (5) 121707
124-Trimethylbenzere NA NA NA NA
135-Trimethylbenzene NA NA NA NA
Vinyl Chloride 440E-06 A IRIS (2) 121707
Xylene (total) NA NA NA NA 1 Acenaphthylene NA NA NA NA 1 Ben20(a)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(a)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(ghi)perylene NA NA NA NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene NA NA NA NA
Bis(2-ethyihexyl)phthaiate NA NA NA NA
Chrysene NA NA NA NA Dibenz(ah)anthracene NA NA NA NA
Dibenzofuran NA NA NA NA
12-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
13-Dichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
14-Dichlorobenzene 110E-05 NA CalEPA 121707
14-Dioxane 770EO6 NA CalEPA 121707
Hexachlorobenzene 460E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
lndeno(123-cd)pyrene NA NA NA NA
Isophorone NA NA NA NA
2-Methylnaphthalene NA NA NA NA
4-Methylphenol NA NA NA NA
Naphthalene NA NA NA NA
Phenanthrene NA NA NA NA
Phenol NA NA NA NA
Pyridine NA NA NA NA
123-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA
124-Trichlorobenzene NA NA NA NA j
2008-O-JV03-0008 Page 1 of 2 Table5-12-24-Q7xlsTable5
TABLE 5
CANCER TOXICITY DATA - INHALATION
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Chemical Source Date of Unit of Potential Unit Risk Cancer Guideline Risk Factor (1)
Concern (ugm3)-1 Description (MMDDYY)
Aluminum NA NA NA NA
Antimony NA NA NA NA
Arsenic 430E-03 A IRIS 121707
Barium NA NA NA NA
Beryllium 240E-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (food) 18DE-03 B1 IRIS 121707
Cadmium (water) NA NA NA NA
Chromium (total) 120E-02 A IRIS (3) 121707
Copper NA NA NA NA
Lead NA NA NA NA
Manganese NA NA NA NA
Mercury NA NA NA NA
Nickel 240E-04 A IRIS 121707
Selenium NA NA NA NA
Thallium NA NA NA NA
Vanadium NA NA NA NA
Aroclor-1242 (particulates) 571 E-G4 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1254 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (particulates) 571 E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1242 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1248 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4) 091807 Aroclor-1254 (volatiles) 114E-04 82 USEPA (4) 091807
Aroclor-1260 (volatiles) 114E-04 B2 USEPA (4J 091807
Aldrin 490E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
alpha-BHC 180E-O3 B2 IRIS 121707
beta-BHC 530E^)4 C IRIS 121707
delta-BHC NA NA NA NA
Chlordane 100E-04 B2 IRIS 121707
44DDE 400E-05 B2 CalEPA 121707
Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA
Heptachlor 13DE-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Heptachlor Epoxide 260E-03 B2 IRIS 121707
Lindane (gamma-BHC) NA NA NA NA
2378-TCDO 33E-05 B2 HEAST 122107
CIO-022 Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C19-C36 Aliphatics NA NA NA NA
C5 - C8 AliphaBcs NA NA NA NA
C9-CIO Aromatics NA NA NA NA
C9 - C12 Aliphatrcs NA NA NA NA
C9-C18Aliphatks NA NA NA NA
NOTES BOLDED ENTRIES INDICATE A CHANGE SINCE THE NOVEMBER 2005 REVISION NA = Not Available signifies inadequate or unassessed inhalation date IRIS = Integrated Risk Information Systen
CalEPA = California Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment Toxicity Criteria Database HEAST= Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables USEPA = US Environmental Protection Agency (1) For IRIS values this is the date IRIS was searched
For ATSDR values this is the date of MRL For CalEPA values this is the date CalEPA was searched For HEAST values this is the date of HEAST For PPRTV values this is the date of the pnjvisional value was confirmed
(2) Value taken from the LMS method for continous lifetime exposure during adulthood (3) Hexavalent Chromium toxicological information used (4) Value taken from email from EPA Region 1 risk assessor with suggested toxicity values (5) Tables 10 11 and 12 also calculate the BAV using the upper bound of the CSF range (110 E-04 ugrr) from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (51407) (listed as the second row entry for TCE in Tables 10 11 and 12
2O08-O-JV03-0008 Page 2 of 2 Table5-12-24-07xlsTable5
TABLE 6
DETERMINATION OF VOLATILITY FOR APPLICATION OF A VOLATILIZATION FACTOR FOR THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOIL COCs
Sllrestm Superfund Site
1 DECISION FACTORS |
Chemical Henrys Law Henrys Law Molecular Is Henrys Law gt10E-05 Is molecular weight VF needed
of Potential Constant 11234) Constant (5) Weight (234) atm-m^mo1 lt200 g mde
Concern H H MW
unitless atm-m3mol g md
Benzene 22SE-01 556E-03 78 1 YES YES YES
Chlorobenzene 152E-01 371E03 1126 YES YES YES
Chtofotonn 150E01 366E-03 1194 YES YES YES
12-Dichk)rDethane 401E02 978E04 99 YES YES YES
11-Dichkraquooethene 107E00 261E02 969 YES YES YES
Ethyltjenzene 323EJ)1 788EJ)3 1062 YES YES YES
Methylene Chlonde 898E-02 219E^)3 8 4 9 YES YES YES
Styrene 1 13E-01 276E-03 104 1 YES YES YES
1122-TetracWoroettiane 141E-02 344E-04 1 6 7 9 YES YES YES
754E-01 184E^)2 1658 YES YES YES
Toluene 270E-O1 659E-03 921 YES YES YES
111-Trichloroethane 705E01 172E-02 1334 YES YES YES
112-Trichloroethane 374E^gt2 912E-CI4 1334 YES YES YES
Tnchloroethene 422E^)1 103E-02 1314 YES YES YES
124-Tnniethylbenzene 252E-01 615E03 120 2 YES YES YES
135-Trimethylbenzene 359E-01 876E-03 120 2 YES YES YES
^^inyl chlonde 1 11E+00 2 71E-02 625 YES YES YES
Benzo(a)anthraoene 137E04 334E-06 228 3 NO NO NO
Benzolta)pyTene 463E05 113E-06 2523 NO NO NO
Benzoltb)fluoranthene 455E^)3 1 11E-04 2523 YES NO NO
Dibenzah)anlhracene 603E-07 147E-08 2784 NO NO NO
12-Dichlorobenzene 779E-02 190E-03 147 YES YES YES
14-Dioxane 196E04 478E-06 881 NO YES NO
Hexachlorobenzene 541EJJ2 132E-03 2848 YES NO NO
4aphtlialene 19eE02 483E-04 1282 YES YES YES
124-Tnchlorobenzene 580E02 141E03 1815 YES YES YES
ftreenpc 7 7 9 NO NO
Lead 207 2 NO NO -Mercury 2006 NO NO
237S-TCDD 204E-03 498E-05 3220 YES NO NO
ftrockx-1242 140E-02 341 E-04 2920 YES NO NO
Aroclor-1254 116E-02 2B3E-04 3264 YES NO NO
ftroclor-1260 137E-02 334E-04 3953 YES NO NO ftluminum Antimony
Arsenic
3arium
Cadmium (food)
Chromium (total)
Copper
Lead
Manganese
k^ercury
ThattHjm
C I O - C 2 2 Aromatics 720E04 300E-02 150 YES YES YES
C 1 9 - C 3 6 Aliphatics YES NO No
C5 - c e Aliphatics 130E+00 540E-01 93 YES YES YES
C9-CIOAromat ics 792E-03 330E-01 120 YES YES YES
C 9 - C 1 2 Aliphatics 156E+00 6 50E+01 149 YES YES YES
C 9 - C I S Aliphatics 166E+00 690E+01 170 YES YES VES II
Footnotes
(1) EPA 2002 Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superlund Sites OSWER 93554-24 December Extiibit C-1
(2) EPA 2004 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I Human Health Evaluation Manual (Pari E) July Appendix 8
(3) Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) tittpnskl5dornl govcgi-bintoxTOX_selectselect =csf Accessed September 26 2007
(4) Syracuse Research Corporation 2007 CHEUFATE Database httpwwwsyrTe3 comescefdbhtm Accessed September 26 2007
(5) EPA 1991 Henrys Law Constant (unitless) was converted to Henrys Lew Constant (atnn-mSmol) using the relationship presented in (he Superfund Exposure
Assessment Manual p 20 equation 2-13
H latm m^ mol] = H x R [atm m^ mol K] x T x K
200ampO-JV03-0008
TABLE 7 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Silresim and Industrial Properties Surrounding Silresim Receptor Population CommercialIndustrial Worker Receptor Age Adult
Parameter Parameter Code Definition
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal (or Lead
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among Fetuses Bonn to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Chjid-Bearing Age
R fetalmaternal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Biolsinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate EF Exposure Frequency
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested Lead in Soil
1 AT Averaging Time for Exposure
PbB fetal 0 95goal PbB adult central goal GSD^^y^^R felal
[PbB - PIgtB^uio)-^T adub cen tral goa I BAV bull
BKSF - m - A F EF
Units
mgkg
ugdL
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
ugdL per ugday
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
Value Rationale Reference
808 Calculated
10 i)
201 [2]
09 [31
193 [21
04 [4)
010 151 150 [6]
012 [7]
365 mdash m mdash
Equation
Model Name
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
II
[1 ] USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concenb-ations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulatkgtn OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concenb^tksns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sherlock et al (1984)
[51 Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-19 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Regional value reflecting the amount of time soil would be covered by snow and ice Suggested value for worfters in non-contact intensive activities (USEPA 2001) (ie non-intrusive) - See USEPA Comment in Appendix A
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] For continuing long tenn exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 1 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCIW
TABLE 8 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION WORKER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe CurrentFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in ttie CSM Receptor Population Construction Worlter Receptor Age Adult
-Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV PbB fetal 095goal
Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among
Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
mgkg
ugdL
232 10
Calculated
11)
Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
GSD 1 adult
R fetalmatemal
PbB adultO
Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among Women of Child-Bearing Age
Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the SKe Soil
ugdL
dimensionless
ugdL
201
09
193
12]
131
12]
BKSF Biokinelic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
ugdL per ugday 04 HI
IRs EF AF
AT
Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate Exposure Frequency Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested
Lead in Soil Averaging Time for Exposure
gday daysyear
dimensionless
days
020 130 012
182
[51 [61 [71
12
Notes
P^fera l 0 95goat ^ aJtilr central goal GSD^y^^ ^ fetal
maternal
B K S F bull m bull A F E F
[1] USEPA 2003 Recommendations ofthe Technical Review Woritgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
[2] USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentrations and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-22 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002) [6j Typical construction project duration reflecting 5 days per week for 6 months (PAR 2001)
[7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble)
[8] Most appropriate averaging time for exposures expected to occur over a period less than 1 year Reflects the duration of the constmction activity As recommended by the Technical Review Wortt Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 2 of 4 3-Tables789xlsCW
TABLE 9 ADULT LEAD MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS FOR THE TRESPASSER
SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Scenario Timeframe Cun^ntFuture Medium Soil Exposure Medium Surface Soil Exposure Point Any Industrial Property Discussed in the CSM Receptor Population Trespasser Receptor Age Adolescent
1 Parameter Parameter Units Value Rationale Equation
Code Definition Reference Model Name
BAV Calculated Risk-Based Cleanup Goal for Lead mgkg 1010 Calculated Adult Lead Model (see Notes)
PbB fetal 095goal Goal for the 95th Percentile Fetal Blood Lead Concentration Among ugdL 10 [11 Fetuses Bom to Women Having Exposures to the Site Soil
GSD i adult Individual Geometric Standard Deviation Blood Lead Level Among ugdL 201 [21 Women of Child-Bearing Age
R fetalmatemal Constant of Proportionality Between the Fetal Blood Lead dimensionless 09 [31 Concentration at Birth and the Maternal Blood Lead Level
PbB adultO Typical Blood Lead Concentration in Adults (Women of Child-Bearing ugdL 193 |2] Age) in the Absence of Exposures to the Site Soil
BKSF Siokinetic Slope Factor Relating Increase in Typical Adult Blood Lead ugdL per ugday 04 [41 Concentration to Average Daily Lead Uptake
IRs Combined Soil and Dust Intake Rate gday 010 [51 EF Exposure Frequency daysyear 120 [6]
AF Absolute Gastrointestinal Absorption Fraction for Ingested dimensionless 012 mLead in Soil
AT Averaging Time for Exposure days 365 181
Notes
p bdquo P^^fe a 0 95gool ^ ^aduhcen l ra l goa l V 645 Z
l y j i J i adult) -Kfetal maternal
bdquo bdquo _ PbBbdquo^i ^bdquobdquo ^ igbdquogi - P b B ^ ^ Q ] bull A T
B K S F bull IR bull A F bull E F
[11 USEPA 2003 Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead EPA-540-R-03-001 OSWER Directive 92857-54 value for protection of the fetus to the same level as children Recommended for estimating cleanup goals based on risk to the developing fetus
(21 USEPA 2002 Blood Lead Concentrations of US Adult Females Summary Statistics from Phases 1 and 2 of the National Health and Nutritbn Evaluation Survey (NHANES III) Table 3a Values for Northeast Region Non-Hispanic White Subpopulation OSWER 92857-52 March 2002 [3] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on Goyer (1990) and Graziano et al (1990)
[4] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value derived from the study of Pocock et al (1983) which based the study between tap water lead concentratbns and blood lead concentrations in adult males and the analysis of Sheriock et al (1984) [5] Set to soil ingestion rate listed in Table 6-26 of the Final Additional Site Investigation and Revision of Site Clean-up Goals (Foster Wheeler 2002)
[6] Set at 120 daysyear to match the original risk assessment assumption The shortest period of time for which the model is to be applied (Technkal Review Work Group for Lead Guidance Document Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Adult Lead Model April 1999 Rev 0) is 90 days An alternate plausible estimate would be based on total months in which direct contact with surface soil through trespassing is considered plausible (total of 6 monti^s) At 2 daysweek for 3 of the monttis and for 4 daysweek for the other 3 months = 72 daysyear [7] USEPA 2003 Table 1 - Default value based on an absorption factor for soluble lead of 020 and the relative bioavailability of Pb as 06 (soilsoluble) [8] For continuing long term exposures Sufficient for blood lead levels to approach quasi-steady state
2008-O-JV03-0008 TD01-066 522008 Page 3 of 4 3-Tables789xlsAT
1
TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR SURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptor and Health Effects Types 1
i Trespasser Trespasser Commercial
Industrial Worker Commercial
Industrial Wortcer Construction
Worilter Construction Woriter Utility Wori(er Utility Worker Most Stringent Basis Practical
Quantitation Policy Recommended Site-Specific Basis
CUG in 2003 Basis
Chemicals of Potential (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria MCP UCL (4) Surface Soil CUG for ESD for Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
TR-C TR-NC CIW-C CIW-NC CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 1122-Tetrachloroethane 29 57000 23 68000 140 39000 630 1000000 23 CIW-C NA NA NA 0005 400 23 CIW-C 20 RISK Trichloroethene 200 (9) 170 180 (9) 250 960 (9) 81 4700 (9) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 190 RISK Trichloroethene 4 (10) 170 31 (10) 250 18 (10) 81 88 (10) 5000 31 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -124-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 320 No Value (1) 73 No Value (1) 9500 73 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 73 CW-NC 73 RISK 135-Trimethylbenzene No Value (1) 44 No Value (1) 76 No Value (1) 18 No Value (1) 4800 18 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - - 18 CW-NC 17 RISK Benzo(a )anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 27 79 79 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Benzo(a)pyrene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 16 57 40 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK Benzo(b)fluoranthehe 75 28000 50 39000 660 21000 690 540000 50 CIW-C 40 18 14 033 - 3000 50 CIW-C 50 RISK Dlbenz(ah)anthracene 75 28000 50 39000 66 21000 69 540000 50 CIW-C 024 10 10 033 - 300 50 CIW-C 5 RISK 14Dioxane 320 No Value (1) 260 No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 260 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 260 CIW-C - -Heicachlorobenzene 22 B10 15 1100 140 590 270 15000 15 CIW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 15 CIW-C 15 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 370 NoVahie (1) 620 No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 18 RISK Arsenic 49 380 30 480 270 270 280 7000 30 CIW-C 21 130 130 10 - 200 30 CIW-C 30 RISK Lead NoVahw (1) 1010 (6) No Value (1) 808 (6) No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) No Value (11) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 03 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 20 No Value (1) 34 No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 004 - 300 080 CW-NC 08 RISK 2378-TCDD 000057 (2) NoVnIiifl (1) 000034 (2) No Value (1) 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 000034 CIW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 (8) 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 0000074 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 (3) No Value (1) 000063 (3) No Value (1) 0001 (3) No Value (1) 0000045 CIW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1248 27 18 18 26 230 13 240 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK Aroclor 1254 22 18 15 26 170 13 230 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 002 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italic are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Traspassar CIW Commercitrilndustrial Wortcer CW = Constructk)n Worker UW = Utility Worker Health Effects Types 0 = Carcinooenic NC = Noncarcinoganic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCU = Upper CcnMsnoe Limit ESP = Explanatkxi of Significafrt Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitatton Limit BK(3D = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL = Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factors (2) Current toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carcinogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 http7wwwirtassgovdepseivicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method Ijased on normaHtylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per comsspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (7) PQLs extracted from the MettKxi SW-646 References for the chemical family groupings or indnndual chemicals (8) USEPA 1998 Memorandum Approach for Addressing Dkjxin in Soil at CERCLA and RCRA Sites OWSER Directive 92004-26 April - Low-end value of 5 to 20 ppb range recommended for commercialindustrial exposure scenarios Used based on correspondance with Region 1 Risk Assessor (61107) (9) BAV based on CaiEPA toxicity value (2007) (10) BAV based on the upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichkgtroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (11) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment In accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
200i-O-IV03-0(m 322008 Plaquogc2or3 total CUGs_0I-07-O8xlsss
TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED GLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs) FOR SUBSURFACE SOIL (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmartc Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types 1 Construction Constrijctksn Most Practical Recommended
Wori(er Wortcer Utility Woricer Utility Worker Stringent Basis Quantitation Policy MCP UCL Site-Specific Basis CUG in Basis (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) BAV for Background Concentration (5) Limit (7) Criteria (4) Subsurface Soil CUG for 2003 ESD for
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkfl) Value (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) (mgkg) Value (mgkg) Value
CW-C CW-NC UW-C UW-NC Mean 95 UCL Maximum 1 Benzene 200 68 1000 8300 68 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 9000 68 CW-NC 004 RISK Chtorobenzene No Value (1) 270 No Value (1) 35000 270 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 270 CW-NC 12 RISK Chkxofom 69 220 72000 26000 69 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 5000 69 CW-C 0015 RISK 12-Oichtofoethane 7600 8200 440 1000000 440 UW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 6000 440 UW-C 0031 RISK
No Value (1) 220 No Value (1) 29000 220 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 10000 220 CW-NC 0005 RISK -EthyHwnzencopy No Value (1) 4500 No Value (1) 490000 4500 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4500 CW-NC 12 RISK
3000 2100 14000 240000 2100 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 2100 CW-NC 056 RISK Styretie No Value (1) 11000 No Value (1) 1000000 11000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 290 RISK 1122-Tetiachloroethane 140 39000 630 1000000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 400 140 CW-C 016 RISK Tetrachloroethene 210 560 660 59000 210 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 210 CW-C 085 RISK Toluene No Value (1) 14000 No Value (1) 1000000 14000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 10000 MCP-UCL 11 RISK 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 4000 No Value (1) 520000 4000 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 4000 CW-NC 13 RISK 112-Trichloroethane 240 3800 1200 100000 240 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 2000 240 CW-C 012 RISK Trichloroethene 960 (8) 81 4700 (8) 5000 81 CW-NC NA NA NA 0005 - 10000 81 CW-NC 025 RISK Trichloroethene 18 (9) 81 88 (9) 5000 18 CW-C - - - - - - - - shyVinyl ChkDride 110 130 990 560000 110 CW-C NA NA NA 0005 - 300 110 CW-C 00062 RISK 12-Dichlorobenzene No Value (1) 2500 No Value (1) 280000 2500 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 10000 2500 CW-NC 75 RISK 14-Dioxane 1600 No Value (1) 4800 No Value (1) 1600 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - - 1600 CW-C - -Hexachlorobenzene 140 590 270 15000 140 CW-C NA NA NA 033 - 300 140 CW-C 6 RISK Naphthalene No Value (1) 140 No Value (1) 18000 140 CW-NC 18 36 11 033 - 10000 140 CW-NC 16 RISK 124-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 150 No Value (1) 18000 150 CW-NC NA NA NA 033 - 9000 150 CW-NC 1 RISK Lead No Value (1) 232 (6) No Value (1) Not Assessed (10) 232 CW-NC 380 1554 1970 030 - 3000 380 BKGD 448 RISK Mercury No Value (1) 080 No Value (1) 100 080 CW-NC 077 42 42 0040 - 300 080 CW-NC 077 RISK 2378-TCDD 00048 (2) No Value (1) 0005 (2) No Value (1) 00048 CW-C NA NA NA 000000052 0005 0003 0003 MCP-UCL 00002 MCP UCL 2378-TCDD 000063 (3) No Value (1) 000065 (3) No Value (1) 000063 CW-C - - - - - - - - - -Aroclor 1242 150 13 220 350 13 CW-NC NA NA NA 0017 - 100 13 CW-NC 13 RISK
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS Italics Candidate CUGs in italics are greater than the MCP UCL Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommercialIndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effecte Types C = Carcinogenic NC = Noncxircinogenic - = No Vdue Identified NA=NotAvailabte CUG Clean-Up Goal UCL bull Upper Confidenoe Limit ESD = Explanation of Signifkraquont Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Practical Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentratkin RISK = Established based on the risk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusetts Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit (1) BAV not calculated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicokgtgical factors (2) Curient toxicofcjgical cananogenic slope factor for dioxin published in CalEPA (3) Proposed toxicological carciriogenic slope factor for dioxin in USEPAs 2000 Dioxin Reassessment (4) MADEP UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtm (5) 95 UCL calculated using the appropriate method based on normalitylognormality of data Maximum value shown when data is not normal or lognormal or if the calculated 95 UCL is greater than the maximum measured value (6) Value resulting from the application of the Adult Lead Model (ALM) used per correspondance with Region 1 Risk ssessor (61107 (7) PQLs extracted from the Method SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (8) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (9) BAV based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk Assessor (42108) (10) Exposure to lead by this receptor is too infrequent and intermittent to warrant asessment in accordance with Assessing Intermittent or Variable Exposure at Lead Sites (USEPA 2003)
2008-CKJV03O008 Page 3 of 3 lolal CUGs_01-07-Oexlssb 522008
1
1
TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF SITE-SPECIFIC BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT VALUES (BAVs) AND RECOMMENDED CLEAN-UP GOALS (CUGs)
FOR GROUNDWATER (COMMERCIALINDUSTRIAL LAND USE) SILRESIM SUPERFUND SITE LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS
Calculated Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Various Receptors and Health Effects Types
Construction Constmction Wortcer Constmction Wortcer Wortcer (open Construction Wortcer Utility Wortcer
(trench) (trench) excavation) (open excavation) (trench) Utility Wortcer (trench) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic) (carcinogenic) (noncarcinogenic)
Chemicals of Potential Concern (mgL) (mgL) (mgfl) (mgL) (mgL) (mgrt) CWt-C CWt-NC CWoe-C CWoe-NC UWt-C UWt-NC
Acetone No Value (1) 4100 No Value (1) 150000 No Value (1) 110000 Benzene 17 56 43 13 18 150 Chlorobenzene No Value (1) 14 No Value (1) 91 No Value (1) 350 Chloroform 93 20 180 54 10 520 12-Dichloroethane 77 780 64 27000 80 20000 11-Dichloroethene No Value (1) 47 No Value (1) 180 No Value (1) 1200 12-Dichloroethene (total) No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) 58 No Value (1) No Value (1) cis-12-Dichloroethene No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Ethylbenzene No Value (1) 67 No Value (1) 84 No Value (1) 1700 Hexachlorobutadiene 16 0041 18 0041 16 11 Methylene Chloride 350 240 1200 780 360 6200 1122-Tetrachloroethane 30 160 13 160 15 890 Tetrachloroethene 11 78 11 85 11 720 123-Trichlorobenzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 37 No Value (1) 25 111-Trichloroethane No Value (1) 620 No Value (1) 4600 No Value (1) 16000 112-TrichlorDethane 11 21 59 21 12 560 Trichloroethene 67 (7) 087 160 (7) 093 69 (7) 23 Trichloroetfiene 2 (8) 087 5 (8) 093 21 (8) 23 Vinyl Chloride 79 15 94 28 83 390 14-Dioxane 37 No Vail m (1) 940 No Value (1) 38 No Value (1) Naphthalene No Value (1) 09 No Value (1) 11 No Value (1) 23 124-Trichlorobonzene No Value (1) 10 No Value (1) 36 No Value (1) 25 Arsenic 48 31 48 31 50 800 Cadmium (water) No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 26 No Value (1) 67 Lead No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) No Value (1) Nickel No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 410 No Value (1) 11000
NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS facs Candkiato CUGs in itoNcs are greater than the MCP UCL or the Method 1 GW3 Standard or both Receptors TR = Trespasser CIW = CommerdaVlndustrial Wortcer CW = Construction Wortcer UW = Utility Wortcer Health Effects Types 0 = Cardnoganic NC = Noocardrwgenic - = No Value Identified NA = Not Available CUG = Clean-Up Goal UCL = Upper Confidence Limit ESD = Explanation of SigniAcant Differences Report (September 2003) PQL = Pracitkal Quantitation Limit BKGD = Established to be the Site background concentration RISK = Established based on the nsk-based BAV POLICY = Established based on USEPA or Mass DEP policy MCP GW-3 = Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Groundwater 3 Standard for the protection of ecological resources MCP UCL= Established to be the Massachusette Contingency Plan Upper Concentration Limit SOL = Solubility Limit (1) BAV not calcraquojlated due to lack of pathway-specific toxicological factore (2) BAV Concentration not calculated due to lack of chemical-spedfic data for Volatilzation Factor calculation (3) Limited data obtained from non-impacted wells (eg VOCs) Background concentrations not yet established (4) Solubilities from Soil Screening Guidance (USEPA 1996) or Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) accessed September 10 2007 (5) MADEP Method 1 GW-3 and UCLs taken from MCP Numerical Standards Spreadsheets - January 2008 httpwwwmassgovdepservicecomplianceriskasmthtn (6) PQLs extracted from the Methcjd SW-846 References for the chemical family groupings or individual chemicals (7) BAV based on CalEPA toxicity value (2007) (8) CUG based on upper bound of the CSF range from the EPAs Trichloroethylene Health Risk Assessment 2001 per request of Region 1 Risk ssessor (42108)
Solubility (4) (mgL)
1000000 1750 472
7920 8520 2250 NA
3500 169 323
13000 2970 200 300
1330 4420 1100 1100 2760
1000000 31 300 NA NA NA NA
Most Stringent
BAV (mgL)
4100 56 14 93 77 47 58
3500 67
0041 240 30 11 10 620 11
087
-79 37
089 10 31 26
410
Basis for
Value
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
SOL CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC cwt-c
CWt-NC
_ cwt-c cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC CWt-NC
CWt-NC
Background Concentration
(3) (mgL)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Practical Quantitation
Limit (6) (mgL)
0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005 0005
-0005 025 001 0005 0010 0005
00030 0040
Policy Criteria (mgL)
-------------------------
MCP Method 1
GW-3 Standard
(5) (mgL)
50 10 1 10 20 30
-50 4 3
-50 30
-20 50 5
-50
-20 50 09
0004 001 02
MCP UCL (5)
(mgL)
100 100 10 100 100 100 100 100 100 30 100 100 100
-100 100 50
-100
-100 100 9
005 015
2
Recommended Site-Specific
Groundwater CUG (mgL)
50 56 1
93 77 30 58 50 4
0041 100 30 11 10 20 11
087
-79 37
089 10
090 0004 001 02
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 cwt-c cwt-c
MCP GW-3 CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CWt-NC MCP-UCL
CWt-C CWt-C
CWl-NC MCP GW-3
CWt-C CWt-NC
-CWt-C cwt-c
CWt-NC CWt-NC
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
CUG in 2003 ESD
(mgL)
50 048 05 02 05
0015 120 50 34
0041 14
061 5
38 50 11 14
-013
-089 015 04 001 003 008
Basis for
Value
MCP GW-3 RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 RISK RISK
-RISK
-RISK RISK
MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3 MCP GW-3
2008-O-JV03-000e Page 1 of 3 total CUGs_01-07-O8xlsgw S22008
APPENDIX A
Draft Sample Calculations of
Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) for Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic
Health Effect Endpoints
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
1 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Benzo(a)pyrene in Surface Soil to be Protective of a Commerciaiyindustrial Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) BAV bull
THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
EF ED ^^^bullIR^CFX^FlY[y^f^CFVAF^ABS^V bullSAY[y^^^^[yp^pOR y^^^VCF BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TERM
(Ic) TR BW ATc
BAV EF bull E D bull (SFo -IR bull C F F f ) + ( S F ^ CF ] bull AF ABS EV SA ) + lUR [ypEFOR y v F c F BW j
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 seel hr PEFshy
(2) 0036 bulli-vyi -^y ^ F)
The PEF for this receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA shown below This value was calculated using Equation 2 with the parameters matched to the characteristics of USEPAs defauh site and location
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314-D -rf^ VF bull C F (3)
(4) D A = p-K)+e^y9-H)
Kbdquo bull ^ o c bull fo i (5)
In general for this Site these three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile However benzo(a)pyrene does not meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so only the particulate inhalation term (using the PEF) was used in the BAV calculations for benzo(a)pyrene
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For benzo(a)pyrene in the surface soil for CommercialIndustrial Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] 013 AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 007 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 9125 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [ 10 kgmg] 1x10-^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10-^ DA = Apparent Diffusivity [cm^sec] 287x10 (Calculated) Di = Diffiisivity in Air [cm^sec] 430x10^ Dw = Diffiisivity in Water [cmsec] 900x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 25 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 150 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UmUt [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 463x10^ IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 100 lUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Not Applicable Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cmVg] 765x10^ (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 102x10 n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [m^kg] 132x10(USEPA Default) 0a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 (USEPA Default) RfC] = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Not Applicable RfDo = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 3x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 730x10deg T = Exposure Interval [sec] 788x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10^ Urn = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] USEPA Default PEF used U = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] USEPA Defauh PEF used V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] USEPA Defauh PEF used VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [mkg] Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 - 11
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kj using Equation 5 is
llt-d = f oc yoc = 102x10cm^lg00075=765xl0^cm^lg (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
9yyDrH)4p^iyDj (4)
p -K ) + e^+(6-H)
plS^ bull43x10^ cm^lsec-463xl0-^]+()2deg^ -9x10^ cm^sec]
035 ^ = 287x10 cm^ I sec
[l7gcm^ -765x10^ cm^g)--02+ [ol5-463x10-^)
The application of a VFs is not appropriate for this COPC because B(a)P does not meet the criteria of being sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10^ atmshymVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) As such this calculation was included onlv for illustration
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW AT^ BAV = bull
EF ED y I R C F I F l U [ y CFIAF bullABS^EV bull S A U l y bull[yp^^OR y VCF^^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = ynrp bull IRc bull CFI bull FI (6)
= y -lOOmgldaylxlO-kglmglO = 333xlOkglmg 3x10 mg I kg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = yV)r- bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA y ^ D
(7)
= K laquo-2 1x10Jtgffg007ngcw^-evelaquor0131evenr(^av3300cm^ =10x10^ AgVwg i x lO mgkg-day =lt = = -
InhalationTerm= y^y^ bullVpppjCF^ bullBW (8)
= VM 7 -f k-^ r 9 3 |-1000-70tg=0 tgVwg N o Value [ 3 2 x W m f kg) ^ s i s
2008-O-JV03-0008 - I l l
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8 (INC)
THI BW AT^ BAV
EF ED y j ^ ^ ^ I R ^ C F l ^ F l ] y y ^ ^ C F l A F A B S E V S A J [ y j ^ ^ [ y ^ ^ O R y ^ y C F B W
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1 bull 70 g-9125^0^5 ^ _ _ _ ^ _ = 3 93x10w k
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF bullED (SFa bullIRs bull C F ] F I ) + ( S F C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR IPEFOR yp ] cF BW I
INGESTION T E R M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull C F 1 bull F I (9) = 730x10deg [mglkg-dayY bulltOO mgday bullx0^kgmg bull]0 = 730x0kg^mg
DermalAbsorptionTerm = SF ^ bull CF bull AFbull ABS^ bull EVbull SA (]())
= 730x10deg [mg I kg - d a y ] bull 1x10 t g m g 007 mg cm -event 013 bullt event day -3300 cm ^ = 2 1 9 x 1 0 kg^ mg | h
InhalationTerm = IUR bull p ^ p ) - C F l bull BW (11)
= No Value bull V -f 0 bull 1000 bull 70 tg = 0 kg bull i mg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
^I 32 xlO m ^ kg
TR BW ATlt BAV
EF ED (SFo IRs bull C F F I ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J bull EV bull S A ) + IUR 1 BW [ypEFOi^ y v F ^ ^ ^ shy
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
xW bulllQkg^l5550days bdquo bdquoo bdquo r deg bull mdash mdash rmdash mdash (t= 502x10deg mgg
ISO^ayx^T- 25^r-[(730x10 kg mg+ (219x10 kg- mg+ (OAgV^^jj
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
2 Sample Calculations of the Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Subsurface Soil to be Protective of a Construction Worker
with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G ofthe 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for surface soil for this receptor assume exposure via incidental ingestion dermal absorption and inhalation of either particulates or volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
(INC) THI bull BW bull ATbdquo
BAV = EF ED y ^ ^ ^ I R ^ ^ C F X ^ F I ] [ j j ^ bullCF V AF bull ABS j E V bullSA]-^ RfC PEF OR y bull CF bull BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TERM INHALATION TER M
TR BW AT^ (Ic)
BAV EF ED (SFa IRs C F I F I ) (SF^ bull CF I bull AF bull ABS bull EV bull SA )4 IUR V P E F OR^ 1 V F C F BW
INGESTION TER M DERMAL TER M INHALATION TER M
The particulate emission factor for this receptor is given by
Q 3600 secjhr PEF =
(2) ^ 0036^l-V^y^^^ -Fix)
In general for this site the PEF for each receptor was taken as the default value from USEPA when the COPC was determined not to be sufficiently volatile to require the calculation of a volatilization factor However the COPC TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile (ie having a Henrys Law Constant greater than or equal to 1x10 atm- mVmole and a molecular weight less than 200 gramsmole) and so the PEF for this compound is not used in the BAV calculations This equation is included here for illustration purposes only
The volatilization factor for this receptor and the surface soil is given by
Q (314 D^ bull T f (3) VF = ^ bullCF3 C 2p-D)
(4) D A = shy pbKy+0bdquo+0H)
^oc fc (5) f^d = oc J oc
These three related parameters were calculated on a chemical-specific basis using these relationships when the COPC was determined to be volatile As discussed above TCE does meet the specified criteria for sufficiently volatile so the volatile inhalation term (using the calculated VF) was used in the BAV calculations for TCE and is illustrated below
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the subsurface soil for Construction Workers the following parameters were used
Parameter Description [units] Value
ABSd = Dermal Absorption Fraction [unitless] NA AF = Adherence Factor of Soil-to-Skin [mgcm^-event] 02 ATc = Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 25550 ATN = Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] 365 BW = Body Weight [kg] 70 CFl = Conversion Factor 1 [kgmg] 1x10^ CF2 = Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] 1x10^ CF3 = Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] 1x10 DA = Apparent Diffiisivity [cm^sec] 205x10^ (Calculated) Di = Diffusivity in Air [cmVsec] 79x10^ Dw = Diffusivity in Water [cm^sec] 91x10^ ED = Exposure Duration [years] 1 EF = Exposure Frequency [daysyear] 130 EV = Event Frequency [eventsday] 1 FI = Fraction Ingested from Contaminated Source [unitless] 1 foe = Fraction of Organic Carbon Content of Soil [unitless] 00075 F(x) = Function Dependent on UnUt [unitless] Not Applicable H = Henrys Law Constant [unitless] 422x10 IRs = Soil Ingestion Rate [mgday] 200 IUR = Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] 200x10 Kd = Soil-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 125x10deg (Calculated) Koc = Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient [cm^g] 166x10^ n = Total Soil Porosity [unitless] 035 71 = Mathematical Constant [unitless] 314159 Pb = Dry Soil Bulk Density [gcm^] 17 PEF = Particulate Emission Factor [mkg] Not Applicable 6a = Air-Filled Soil Porosity [unitless] 015 0w = Water-Filled Porosity [unitless] 02 QC = Inverse of the Mean Concentration at Center of Square
Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] 487 RfCi = Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] 400x10 RfDD = Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10 RfDo = Oral Reference Dose [mgkg-day] 300x10^ SA = Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm^] 3300 SFD = Dermal Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ SFo = Oral Cancer Slope Factor [mgkg-day] 130x10^ T = Exposure Interval [sec] 315x10^ THI = Target Hazard Index [unitless] 1 TR = Target Risk [unitless] 1x10 Um = Mean Annual Wind Speed [ms] Not Applicable Ut = Equivalent Threshold Value of Wind Speed at 10 m [ms] Not Applicable V = Fraction of Vegetative Cover [unitless] Not Applicable VFs = Soil-to-Air Volatilization Factor [m^kg] 995x10
V I bull2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
The calculation for Kltj using Equation 5 is
I d =^oc -foe = 166x10 c^Vg-00075 = 125x10deg cwV (5)
DA is then calculated using Equation 4
(4) DA =
p-K)+0^+0^H)
(015deg-79x10-cwVsec bull422x10)H-(02deg-91x10^ cwVsec)
035 = 205x10 cwVsec
(17 gcm bull 125x10deg CW Vg)+ 02 -1- (o 15 bull 422x10)
The volatilization factor (VF) is then calculated using Equation 3
(3) C 2 p D )
^ an t 2 3 (314-205xlGc77sec-315xlOsecr ^4 2 bdquo bdquo ^2 3 VF = 487g m - sec perkg I m-^ 3 oraquoc n-4 2 r ^ bull 10( cw)= 9-95x10mV^g
(2-17^cm -205x10 cm sec)
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
(INC) THI BW ATbdquo
BAV
EF ED ^^^bullIRsCFX^Flj^[y^^^CFX^AF^ABS^EV^SAy^y^^^[y^^ORy^J^CF^BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
IncidentalIngestionTerm= Yufn IRs CFl FI (6) RfDo Rl^o 1 bull 200 wgpoundaj-1x10 itgwg-10 = 667x10tgVwg ^3x10 mgkg-day
Dermal Absorption Term = Vrri bull CFl bull AF bull ABSJ -EV SA ty^D
= 1 bdquo 4 -IxlO^ kgmg bull02 mgcm -event bullNoValue bull I eventday 3300 cm =000 kg ymg (^) 3x lO mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = j ^ bull Vyp)- CFl bull BW (8)
= K n bull h ^ o m^ 3 lOOOMgmg-70^g = 176x10deg ^gVwg 4x10 mgKg-aoy 1^995x10 m kg J lt= c o 0 1 0
Combining Equations INC 6 7 and 8
2008-O-JV03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
(INC) THI BW bull AT
BAV
EF ED bull [yRfD^^-^^-y (XDC^-^^-^^^--^ bullYiRjc ypEpO yvF^^-] INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
bull70g-365cagt5 810x10ngtg
130poundav5vr-lgtr-[(667x10tg7ng)+(0tgVg)+(l-76x10degtgVg I
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR BW AT^ BAV
EF ED (SFo bull I R s ^ C F ^ F l ) + (SFj bull C F ^ AF bull ABS ^ bull EV bull S A ) + IUR bull | j ^ ^ f OR j ^ ^ c F bull BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
Incidental Ingestion Term = SFo bull IR^ bull CF bull Fl tlt)
= 130x10^ [ m g l k g - d a y Y 100 mgdaybullIxlO kgmg-10 = 160-^ k g m g
Dermal Absorption Term = SFbdquo bull CFl bull AF bull ABS^ bull EV bull SA j QN
= 130x10^ [mg^g-lt^av] bullXxlQ kg mg Olmg cm^ - event bull NoValue bull event day 3300 cm = 000 kg mg
InhalationTerm = IUR bull(IVF)-CF1^BW (11)
= 200x10 bullug m -f I bull 1000 ug mg bulllOkg = 41 xlO kg mg 995x10 m kg
Combining Equations Ic 9 10 and 11 (Ic)
TR BW AT BAV
EF ED (SFg IRs CF ^ F l ) + ( S F bull C F ^ AF bull ABS J EV bullSA)+ lUR bullypEF deg yvF]-^^ BW
INGESTION TERM DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
1x10 bull 70 ^g bull 25550 pounday5 960x10 mgkg
UOdaysyr -lyr- [(260x10 kgymg)+ (0)tg 7^)+ (1-41x10 V^g)]
2008-O-A03-0008
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
3 Sample Calculation ofthe Benchmark Assessment Values for Trichloroethene (TCE) in Groundwater (Open Excavation andor Trench) to be Protective of a
Construction Worker with respect to Non-Carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Health Effects
As presented in Appendix G of the 2002 CUG Report the BAVs for groundwater for this receptor assume exposure via dermal absorption and inhalation of volatiles The derivation of Equation INC (for non-carcinogenic COPCs) and Equation Ic (for carcinogenic COPCs) is presented in Appendix F-1 of that document
T H I bull B W A T BAV
E F bull E D bull DA bull C F bull BW y RfD c -E^ - ^ ^ V W R J C VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
(Ic) TR bull BW bull AT c
BAV
E F bull E D ( S F 0 bull DA E V bull SA ) + f IUR C F 2 bull B W event I Cgw VF
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
The absorbed dose per dermal contact event per unit of groundwater concentration (DAeventcgw) for this receptor is calculated using three different equations depending on the volatility ofthe compound and the exposure event duration
For organic compounds
If tevent ^ t thcn
DA^ecs = ^FA bull K^ bull CF4 bull j ^ ^ ^ - (2A) V TT
Iftevengttthen
--3B-t-3B DA^^^bdquo ^^FA-K^CF4- bull + 2r (2B)
1 + 5 l^Bf For inorganics or highly ionized organic compounds
D) - fC bull CFd t (2C)
The inhalation volatilization factor (VFglaquo) for this receptor is calculated according to two different exposure scenarios
Where VFgw for standing groundwater to breathing space in an excavation trench is defined as the following
VairD-CF2 VF gw (3A) E^-L
And VFg v for standing groundwater to breathing space in an open air excavation is defined as the following
Q- bull CF3 VF =^-pound (3B)
aveN
2008-O-JV03-0008 IX shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For TCE in the groundwater at an open excavation for the Construction Worker the following parameters were used
Parameter
ATc ATN
B
BW = CF2 = CF3 = CF4 = D J J A ventCgw~
ED EF EN =
EV FA IUR JaveN
Kp
L n QC
RfC RfDo SA SFD
t ^event
^event
THI TR V bull V air
VF gw
Description [units]
Averaging Time (Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Averaging Time (Non-Carcinogenic Effects) [days] Dimensionless Ratio ofthe Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the Stratum Comeum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis [unitless] Body Weight [kg] Conversion Factor 2 [ugmg] Conversion Factor 3 [m^cm^] Conversion Factor 4 [1 Lcm^] Depth of Excavation Trench [m] Absorbed Dose Per Dermal Contact Event per Unit of Groundwater Concentration [mgcm^-event per mgL] Exposure Duration [years] Exposure Frequency [daysyear] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normahzed to the Area ofthe Trench Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Event Frequency [eventsday] Fraction Absorbed [unitless] Cancer Inhalation Unit Risk [ugm^] Volatile Emission Rate Calculated Using the WATERS Model (USEPA 1995a) Normalized to the Area ofthe Excavation Bottom and the Dissolved Volatile Chemical Concentration in the Groundwater [(gsec-m^)(mgL)] Dermal Permeability Coefficient of Compound in Water [cmhr] Length of Excavation Trench [m] Mathematical Constant [unitless] Inverse ofthe Mean Concentration at Center of Square Source [gm^-sec per kgm^] Inhalation Reference Concentration [ugm^] Dermal Absorption Reference Dose [mgkg-day] Skin Surface Area Available for Contact [cm ] Dermal Absorption Slope Factor [(mgkg-day)] Time to Reach Steady-State (24Teveiit) [hr] Event Duration [hrevent] Lag Time Per Event [hrevent] Target Hazard Index [unitless] Target Risk [unitless] Average Velocity ofthe Air Flow Through the Trench and Over the Standing Groundwater [ms] Groundwater Volatilization Factor for Standing Groundwater to Breathing Space in an Open Air
Value
25550 365
Not Applicable 70 1x10^ 1x10 1x10^ Not Applicable
191x10 1 130
Not Applicable Not Applicable 1 1 200x10
125x10
120x10^ Not Applicable 314159
487 400x10 300x10^ 3300 130x10^ 139 058 057 1 1x10
Not Applicable
2008-O-JV03-0008 X shy
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
Excavation [m L] 390x10 Since tlttevent for TCE the calculation for DAeventcgw using Equation 2A is
DA ert = ^FA bull K^ bull CFA bull I t l e ^ n T L ^
6 bull 057hr I event bull OSihr I event P^^ bdquo=2- l -1 20xl0 cm r - lx l0^I cm -J = 191x10^mgcm-evewrpermgL
VFg v is then calculated for an open excavation using Equation 3B
_QyCF3 _ 4S7gsec-m^permyi-IxlO^kgmg _ VFbdquo = 3 90xWmyL
oveN 125x10 g s ec -m permgL
Equations INC and Ic were grouped into collections of related terms to allow for better presentation ofthe calculations For the non-carcinogenic BAV calculation
THI bull BW AT BAV
EF bull ED XyDbdquo-^^~-c -^^ bull ^ bull ^ j M X y c X F ^ bullc^^-BH
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
Dermal Absorption Term = pyr- TgtA ( bull EV bull SA (4) RJ-D
= ^ bdquo bdquo bdquo 4 bull9x0~^ mgcm-event permg I L-eventday bull3300cm=2 0x0 kg-Lmg 300x10 mgkg-day
Inhalation Term = 1 ^ - i^^ | - CFl bull BW (5)
X00xl0gg-yayJiX90xl03Lj^deglaquo^^-^deg^ = - ^ ^^-^^
Combining Equations INCJ 4 and 5
THI bull BW AT BAY
E F bull ED y jD bdquo-^^trade -bull bull y y y R c X ^ ^ ^ ^ DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM (INC)
l -70^g-365^qy5 935x10MgL
n0daysyr^yr-^2 0xW kg-Llmg)+[449x0- kg-Llmg)
2008-O-JV03-0008 - X I bull
Tetra Tech EC Inc Draft Sample Calculations
Of Benchmark Assessment Values (BAVs) For Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effect Endpoints
For the carcinogenic BAV calculation (Ic)
TR - BW bull AT cBAV
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA bdquobdquo ^ bull E V bullSA ) + IUR bull y bull CF 2 bull BW
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
D e r m a l Absorpt ion Term = SF bull DA^bdquo ^ ^ E V ^ S A (6) = 10 x t O [mg I kg - day ]bull 191 x l O m g c m ^ - e v e n t permg L bulltevent day -3300 cm ^ = 8 1 8 x 1 0 t g - L m g
Inhalat ionTerm = IUR bull X bdquo - C F l bull BW (7)
= 2 0 0 x 1 0 ug I m Y -I I bull1000 ug I mg bull10 kg = 3 5 9 x 1 0 leg - L m g 3 90x10 m bull
Combining Equations Ic 6 and 7 (Ic)
TR bullBW bull AT BAV bdquo =
E F bull ED ( s F bdquo bull DA EV bull SA ) + IUR I bull ^Xrr C F 1 bull BW V F
DERMAL TERM INHALATION TERM
lx10 bull 70 tg bull 25550 days = 161x10^ wgL
3^daysyr -lyr- [(818x10 kg - Lmg)+ (359x10 kg - Imgj]
2008-O-JV03-0008 - Xll shy