Stanford CV Surgery
Techniques for ischemic mitral valve disease:
An Update
Grant/ Research Support: NHLBI RO1 HL67025 Consulting Fees/Honoraria:
•Stanford PI – PARTNER Trial, Edwards Lifesciences •Consultant, Abbott Vascular Structural Heart (MitraClip) •Consultant, Medtronic CardioVascular Division •Consultant, St. Jude Medical •Executive Committee, PARTNER U.S. Pivotal Trial , Edwards Lifesciences (non-remunerative)
Major Stock Shareholder/Equity Interest: Royalty Income: Ownership/Founder: Salary: Intellectual Property Rights: Other Financial Benefit:
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
Stanford CV Surgery
FMR and IMR PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC MECHANISMS &
TREATMENT
Levine, RA New Eng J Med 351: 1681,
2004
Stanford CV Surgery
Two mechanisms of leaflet malcoaptation:
Annular dilation with Carpentier type I leaflet motion (IMLC)
PPM
AML
PML
S-L
Stanford CV Surgery
Why do leaflets malcoapt in patients with IMR/FMR?
Two mechanisms of leaflet malcoaptation:
Annular dilation with Carpentier type I leaflet motion (IMLC)
AML
PPM
PML
Most common in FMR
Early and mid systolic leak
Stanford CV Surgery
Why do leaflets malcoapt in patients with IMR/FMR?
Two mechanisms of leaflet malcoaptation:
Papillary muscle displacement with apically restricted systolic leaflet motion (type IIIb)
(apical tethering, tenting) PPM
AML
PML
Stanford CV Surgery
Why do leaflets malcoapt in patients with IMR/FMR?
Two mechanisms of leaflet malcoaptation:
Papillary muscle displacement with apically restricted systolic leaflet motion (type IIIb)
(apical tethering, tenting)
PML AML
PPM
Why do leaflets malcoapt in patients with IMR/FMR?
Most common in IMR
Early systolic leak Stanford CV Surgery
Both mechanisms (type I and type IIIb) of leaflet malcoaptation can coexist in the same patient
Stanford CV Surgery
Why do leaflets malcoapt in patients with IMR/FMR?
Stanford CV Surgery
Advances in Echocardiography
Are Color Doppler and rt 3-D TEE just for amateurs?
But please don’t take away my X-plane and color M-mode
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Mechanisms of MR- Color M-mode echo Early systolic (FMR)
Stanford CV Surgery
Mechanisms of MR- Color M-mode echo Holosystolic (IMR)
Stanford CV Surgery
Mechanisms of MR- Color M-mode echo Late systolic (prolapse)
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR/FMR - apical tenting (type IIIb)
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR/FMR - apical tenting (type IIIb)
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR/FMR - type I s/p Bolling Procedure
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR/FMR - type I s/p Bolling Procedure
Stanford CV Surgery
Human Mitral “annulus”
From FC Wells and LM Shapiro, 1996
Stanford CV Surgery
Hueb AC et al., J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 216-24 Stanford CV Surgery
Standard Surgical Approach
Frank Langer, Homburg, Germany Stanford CV Surgery
Mihaljevic, T. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2191-2201
Surgical treatment of IMR
with ring annuloplasty ± CABG
Stanford CV Surgery
Mihaljevic, T. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2191-2201
3+ or 4+ residual/recurrent MR
Stanford CV Surgery
Mihaljevic, T. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:2191-2201
Survival After CABG ± Concomitant MV Annuloplasty
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Recurrent/residual MR ≥2+ after
ring annuloplasty for IMR
Magne et al. Cardiology 2009;112:244–259 Stanford CV Surgery
Large variety of annuloplasty rings available
a.) Various shapes (flat, saddle, dog bone)
b.) Various configurations (partial, complete)
c.) Various material properties (flexible, semi-flexible, rigid)
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR-FMR disease-specific ring designs Disproportionate septal-lateral dimension reduction
Bothe W, Swanson J, et al., JTCVS 139:1114-1122, 2010
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR-FMR disease-specific ring designs Disproportionate S-L reduction vs. CE Physio
Bothe W, Swanson J, et al., JTCVS 139:1114-1122, 2010 Stanford CV Surgery
IMR-FMR disease-specific ring designs Disproportionate S-L reduction vs. CE Physio
Bothe W, Swanson J, et al., JTCVS 139:1114-1122, 2010 Stanford CV Surgery
•Coapsys®, SLAC, Hvass PM sling or
PM-suturing, Kron UVA stitch, Homburg
“STRING”, second-order chordal cutting,
CorCap CSD, Fontan stitch, epicardial LV
balloon patch, LV wall polymer injection
Adjunctive surgical subvalvular approaches
Stanford CV Surgery
CorCap CSD
Acorn Medical
Stanford CV Surgery JTCVS 2011; 142:569-574
Stanford CV Surgery JTCVS 2011; 142:569-574
Stanford CV Surgery JTCVS 2011; 142:569-574
Ventricular Level Approaches
Hvass Papillary Muscle Sling
U Hvass, et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:809 –11
Stanford CV Surgery
U Hvass, et al. JTCVS 2010;139:418-423
Hvass Papillary Muscle Sling
Stanford CV Surgery
CIRCULATION 2010; 122 [suppl 1] : S29–S36
Ventricular Level Approaches
Papillary Muscle Imbrication (Univ. of Osaka)
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
MGH thrust #2- 2° order CT cutting to AMVL
Messas, Guerrero, Handschumacher, Conrad, Chow, Sullivan,
Yoganahan, Levine (CIRCULATION 2001; 104:1958-1963) Stanford CV Surgery
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1483-92
MR grade Ring + CABG Ring + CT cutting +CABG
Stanford CV Surgery
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:1483-92
Event-free survival
Defined as freedom from death, recurrent >
moderate MR, reop, TE, hemolysis, major
ACH , or PVE
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR/MR
Is the MR the real culprit ?
Stanford CV Surgery
Benefits of MR Reduction in Ischemic MR Patients:
Lessons from RESTOR_MV Trial Open CABG + ring annuloplasty
vs. OpCAB + Coapsys
Eugene A. Grossi, MD
for the RESTOR-MV Study Group
NYU School of Medicine &
NY Harbor Veterans Healthcare System Stanford CV Surgery
RESTOR_MV Trial: FDA Prospective Study
Minimally invasive (no CPB) Ventricular Shape Change Device
Stanford CV Surgery
RESTOR_MV: MR Evaluation
CABG+MVRepair vs. CABG+Coapsys
Both effect of time and treatment p=0.0001 Stanford CV Surgery
Intent-To-Treat: All Patient Survival
Stanford CV Surgery
Other Approaches
de Varennes CIRC 2009 Langer CIRC 2009 Borger JTCVS 2007
LV systolic function ? X-clamp time ?
Stanford CV Surgery
STRING-technique Kron-technique • via atriotomy • final tension in arrested heart
• via horizontal aortotomy • final tension in loaded beating heart under TEE guidance
Stanford CV Surgery
IMR (n=60) with severe leaflet tethering (tenting height > 10 mm)
historical matched control group
(n=30)
RING RING+STRING
study group (n=30)
Langer CIRC 2009
Stanford CV Surgery
> 10 mm
Stanford CV Surgery
> 40 mm
Stanford CV Surgery
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 840
20
40
60
80
100RING+STRING
RING
3030
2626
2024
923
322
subjects at risk 020
014
0 0
p=0.13
Follow-up (months)
Su
rviv
al
(%)
F. Langer CIRC 2009 Stanford CV Surgery
0 12 24 36 48 60 72 840
25
50
75
100RING+STRING
RING
subjects at risk3030
2520
1818
918
317
016
010
0 0
p=0.01
*
Follow-up (months)
Fre
ed
om
fro
m M
R >
II (
%)
F. Langer CIRC 2009 Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery AATS 2012
Stanford CV Surgery EJCTS 2011;39:295-303
Goal for CHF and FMR / IMR
Accomplish something below the annulus in
conjunction with disease-specific undersized
annuloplasty ring designs and/or other
adjunctive procedures to restore and maintain
more elliptical LV shape and minimize MR
Which should translate into better reverse
LV remodeling
Stanford CV Surgery
Stanford CV Surgery
Thank you