+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for...

Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for...

Date post: 13-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
Transcript
Page 1: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic
Page 2: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

JSC “CENTER OF EARTH SCIENCE, METALLURGY AND ORE BENEFICATION”

Authors: Abdulvaliyev R.A., Tastanov E.A., Gladyshev S.V., Akhmadiyeva N.K.

Page 3: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for red mud

Page 4: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

SACS

SACS

SACS

SACSH

HH

H

ASH

ASH

CT

T

Compound Name Formula

Hematite Fe2O3

Aluminum Silicate Hydrate Al2Si70O143·H2O

Sodium Aluminum Carbonate Silicate 3NaAlSiO4·Na2CO3

Calcite CaCO3

Tridymite (syn) SiO2Component NaO Al2O3 SiO2 Fe2O3 TiO2 CaO

% 9,95 39,53 6,18 23,12 4,37 1,1

Page 5: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360

Alu

min

a ex

tract

ion

effic

ienc

y, %

Concentration of Na2O, g/L

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

150 200 250 300 350 400

The

Na 2

O c

onte

nt in

HHM

Concentration of Na2O, g/L

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3

Alu

min

a ex

tract

ion

effic

ienc

y, %

molar ratio of CaO:SiO2

00,5

11,5

22,5

33,5

44,5

0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5

The

Na 2

O c

onte

nt in

HHM

molar ratio of CaO:SiO2

The optimum conditions for leaching were found to be: 240°C, 90 minutes, liquid to solid molar ratio of 4, CaO:SiO2 molar ratio of 2,25, αk=30.

Page 6: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 30 60 90 120 150 180Alu

min

a ex

tract

ion

effic

ienc

y, %

Digestion time, min

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

0 50 100 150 200

The

Na 2

O c

onte

nt in

HHM

Digestion time, min

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

180 200 220 240 260 280 300Alu

min

a ex

tract

ion

effic

ienc

y, %

Temperature, °C

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

180 200 220 240 260 280 300

The

Na 2

O c

onte

nt in

HHM

Temperature, °C

Page 7: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

% Al2O3 SiO2 TiO2 CaO Fe2O3 Na2O

Hydrogarnet mud 4.04 11.85 7,03 23,82 41.95 0.32

g/L Al2O3 SiO2 Na2O SO3 αk

Middle modulus solution 24.24 0.05 172.94 3,52 11.22

Compound Name FormulaHematite Fe2O3Andradite (hydrated) Ca3(Fe0.87Al0.13)2(SiO4)1.65(OH)5.4Katoite, syn Ca3Al2(O4H4)3Magnetite, syn Fe3O4

Page 8: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

Component, ppm Ga Sc Y La Ce Nd Sm Eu Gd Er Lu ΣREE

Magnetic faction 57 64,5 6,5 51 - 23 - - 25,4 9 7 186,4

Non-magnetic faction 17 167,0 57 144 33,6 80 2 3 33 6,5 1 527,1

Component, %

Pig iron Slag Magnetic

faction Non-

magnetic faction

Fe 94.7 37,56 0,22Si 3,2 6,79 9,47Ti 1,8 14,1 1,07Al 0.52 4,36 12,43P 0.001 C 2,3Cr 0.38

Mn 0.101 Ni 0.043 Cu 0.052 Ca 11,52 35,94

Page 9: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

30

40

50

60

70

20 40 60 80 100 120

Degr

ee o

f syn

thes

is, %

Temperature, °CEffect of leaching temperature

on synthesis of TCHA

30

40

50

60

70

50 100 150 200 250Degr

ee o

f syn

thes

is, %

Duration, min30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

50 80 110 140 170

Degr

ee o

f syn

thes

is, %

CaO, %Effect of CaO addition on synthesis of TCHA (from 100% in an amount stoichiometrically required СaO)

Effect of leaching duration on synthesis of TCHA

Na2O·AI2O3+3 Са(ОН)2 = 3CaO·AI2O3·6H2O + 2NaOH

Compound Name Formula %

Calcium Aluminium Hydrogen Oxide Ca3Al2(O4H4)3 91,5

Portlandite, syn Ca(OH)2 4

Calcite, syn CaCO3 4

Paraalumohydrocalcite CaAl2(CO3)2(OH)4·6H2O 0,5

The optimum conditions for synthesis of tricalcium hydroaluminate were found to be: 100°C and 2 hours.

Page 10: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

1

2

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Degr

ee o

f TC

AH

deco

mpo

sitio

n

Na2CO3, g/dm3

Effect of TCAH decomposition on soda solution concentration on different temperatures1 – 100 °C,2 - 180 ͦ C

Tricalcium hydroaluminate decomposition was carried out with 3 types of solution:- alkali solution Na2O 240 g/L- sodium-alkali solution Na2O 120 g/L and Na2CO3 20 g/L- soda solution Na2CO3 60-160 g/L

Compound name Formula S-Q, %

Calcyte Ca(CO3) 88,3

Unnamed_Hydrogarnet (CaO)3(Al2O3)1,75(H2O)3,75 6

Sodium Carbonate Oxide Na2CO3 5,7

The optimum conditions of decomposition were found to be: CNa2CO3 -140g/L , t-180ºC, τ-2 h, L:S = 4

Page 11: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

Comp. %

Na2O 24,8

Al2O3 29,5

CO2 31,5

Ga 0,52

V2O5 0,92

Page 12: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for red mud

Page 13: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

As a result of processing of red mud by hydrogarnet technology98,0 of alkali regenerated.Hydrogarnet mud – silicaferrous concentrate with high consumerproperties. 64,9% of Al2O3 extracted from hydrogarnet mud.The optimum conditions for leaching were found to be: 240°C, 90minutes, liquid to solid ratio of 4, CaO:SiO2 molar ratio of2,25, αk=30.The optimum conditions for synthesis of tricalciumhydroaluminate were found to be: 100°C and 3-4 hours.The optimum conditions for decomposition of tricalciumhydroaluminate were found to be: Na2CO3 concentration 140-160g/l, 180°C and 2 hours. Extraction of Al2O3 95-98,3%.Direct smelting reduction of hydrogarnet mud to obtain pig ironand slag was studied. Extraction of iron into pig iron was 88%.

Page 14: Technological scheme of hydrogarnet process for …conference2015.redmud.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/P7...Gd Er Lu Σ REE Magneticfaction 57 64,5 6,5 51-23--25,4 9 7 186,4 Non-magnetic

Recommended