Technological transformation and payment
systemsLorenza Martínez Trigueros, June 2016
Summary
Innovation: existing versus disruptive networks
Innovation brings new participants and services...
…and changes the way we pay
Mexican experience: benefits of innovation
New challenges: regulation
2
1
2
3
4
5
Innovation: existing versus disruptive networks
Incremental innovations have had an important impact
• Network externalities on payment systems: take advantage of critical
mass
3
Innovation
Existing networks
Disruptive networks
Cards
Transfers and others
Virtual assets
Parallel networks of
existing services
10
01 10
01
1
New participants and services
4
Card
Networks
Checks and
Transfers
Befo
reC
urr
ently
New
2
t+1
Devices
Innovation changes participants and services
5
2
Technological
transformation
Reduces
fixed costs
New participants
or systems
New/improved
services and
products
– prices
– barriers to entry
Expands
frontiers
+ competition
+ participants
+ different participants
(non-banks)
+ users (financial
inclusion)
+ use by existent
customers
+ customer experience
(e.g., + trust in non-
banks, - steps to pay for
customers)
+ flexible products
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 2014
Card payments Direct debits Checks
Credit transfers E-money payments
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2005 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 2014
Card payments Direct debits Checks
Credit transfers E-money payments
The way we pay is changing
6
Distribution of transactions by method of payment
1/ CPMI countries: Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China,
France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico,
Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa,
Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States.
Source: CPMI
3
2/ EMDEs: Brazil, China, India, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South
Africa and Turkey.
Source: CPMI
CPMI countries1/ EMDEs2/
43% Card payments
25% Checks
61%
7%
37% Card payments
26% Checks
70%
3%
Mexican experience: cards systems
7
Reduction of entry barriers for aggregators has brought new benefits and
improvements.
446 447 482548
622682
765
867
41
61
131
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
1,100
2008 09 10 11 12 13 14 2015
POS, banks POS, aggregators
Source: Bank of Mexico
Number of POS terminals from banks and aggregators
Mexico, thousands
4
In 2015, one of the largest aggregators affiliated:
+ 8,000 taxi cabs (1% of total POS)
+ 6,500 small merchants
13%
Mexican experience: cards systems
8
Advances in regulation:
However, there are still areas of opportunity in terms of high discount rates and
low penetration.
Source: CPMI Source: Bank of Mexico
POS terminals per million inhabitants
CPMI countries, 2014
Discount rates on debit and credit cards
Percentage
4
2.38%
1.98%
1.80%
2.83%
2.36%2.23%
1.5%
1.7%
1.9%
2.1%
2.3%
2.5%
2.7%
2.9%
3.1%
2006 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 2015
Debit Credit
• Reduce entry barriers for ACHs
• Reduced tariffs
• New cards acquirers (business model: information based)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Au
str
alia
Tu
rke
y
Ita
ly
Un
ited
Kin
gd
om
Sin
ga
po
re
Can
ad
a
Bra
zil
Fra
nc
e
Sw
itzerl
an
d
Sw
ed
en
Neth
erl
an
ds
Belg
ium
Ch
ina
Germ
an
y
Ru
ss
ia
So
uth
Afr
ica
Mex
ico
Sau
di A
rab
ia
Ind
ia
2015
SPEI, the Mexican RTGS and fast payment system, is allowing for system-wide
interoperability and relevant new services such as mobile payments on a 24 / 7
schedule.
Electronic disbursement of federal payments has cut costs by 3.3% of total
annual expenditure.3/
9
1995
SPEUA began operations.
Min. transaction: $38K USD.
Fee: $0.18 USD.
1996
Min. transaction:
$8K USD
1997
Min transaction:
$4K USD2004
SPEI began operations
Min. transaction: $4K USD.
Fee: $0.08 USD.
2005
SPEUA shuts down
Min. transaction: removed
2006
Fee: $0.04 USD
2000: Banxico began
the design of SPEI
1990 2000 2010
2015
24/7 Operation
Mobile payments
2015
Fee = MC = $0
SPEUA SPEI SPEI 24/7
Min. transaction is the minimum amount per transfer on SPEUA/SPEI
Fee is the amount that Banxico charges to commercial banks per transaction on SPEUA/SPEI.
Mexican experience: transfers4
3/ Babatz (2013). “Sustained Effort, Saving Billions: Lessons from the Mexican Government’s Shift,” Better Than Cash Alliance.
Mexican experience: new developments
10
New technologies attack the reasons behind people not having a bank account
(restrictive requirements, high prices, distance to bank branches). Potential: users have
shown increased acceptance of developments such as mobile banking.
Some new products and services might convey lower transaction costs and faster
services. This is potentially beneficial for the remittances market, where users still face
relatively high prices.
4
200 USD 500 USD
Bank 4.68% 3.31%
MTO 5.15% 3.42%
Total 5.09% 3.40%
4q 2015 4.75% 3.15%
Remittance prices in USA-MEX corridor
As % of value sent, 2015
Source: Remittance Prices Worldwide, World Bank247,473
883,657
2,699,378
5,087,915
6,070,183
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Number of accounts with mobile banking
functionality
Source: National Banking and Securities Commission
Data corresponds to the last quarter of each year, except for 2015 (2nd quarter)
New challenges: regulation
11
Technological changes pose benefits (+ competition, quality and quantity of payment
alternatives)…
… albeit new risks (e.g., cybersecurity, data privacy, money laundering, financial
instability)
Necessity to create a regulatory framework. Considerations:
Focus on services rather than on particular entities or payment devices
Protect consumers
Give legal certainty to payment service providers
Enough flexibility as to encourage innovation
Degree of regulatory power over payment innovations relies on:
• Type of network innovations are installed on (existing or parallel networks)
• Degree of centralization
• Ability to move internationally
5