Technology Resource Innovation
Outreach (TRIO) Roundtable November 7, 2012
EEFG, San Francisco, CA
Hosted by Pacific Gas and Electric Company
2
Welcome!
Susan Preston, General Partner
CalCEF Clean Energy Angel Fund
3
Safety Message
In Case of Emergency
4
Agenda
9:00 Welcome and introductions
Utility Programs: The Big Picture
ET Adoption Process
10:40 Networking Break
ET Adoption Process, continued
12:00 pm Networking Lunch
Program Development Primer
Q&A
2:00 Meeting Adjourned
5
Introductions
1. Your name and title/role
2. Company name
3. Brief product / service description
4. Target customers
Utility Programs: The Big Picture
Aaron Panzer, Manager
Emerging Technologies Program
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
7
Energy services to 15 MM people:
• 5.1 MM Electric customer accounts
• 4.3 MM Natural Gas accounts
70,000 square miles with diverse topography
and climate zones
20,000 employees
A regulated investor-owned utility
Ranked the greenest utility in the United States
in 2009 and 2010
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
8
California’s Progressive Utility
Regulatory Model
Cost Recovery
Shareholders’ Earnings
Decoupling Policy
California’s Investor Owned Utilities have no incentive
to sell more electricity
9
Balancing Competing Priorities
Reliable Service
Reasonable
Cost
Environmental
Sustainability
10
CA Long Term EE Strategic Plan
2020 Goal: EE is “Business as Usual”
Foundation of innovation, integration and
collaboration establishes vision
• All cost-effective, reliable, and
feasible measures
• Integrated systems or whole-building
approach
• Long-term energy savings
• Significant reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions
More information available at www.californiaenergyefficiency.com
11
Emerging Technologies Program
Increase energy efficiency technology supply and
market demand
• Supply: Promote development and deployment of
new and underutilized energy efficiency measures
• Demand: Facilitate adoption
The Emerging Technologies Coordinating Council (ETCC)
is a collaborative forum for information exchange.
12
Technology Resource Incubation
Outreach (TRIO)
• Joint initiative of California’s investor-owned utilities (IOUs):
PG&E, SCE, SoCal Gas, and SDG&E
• Authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission
• Funded through electric and natural gas rates
Engage early-stage entrepreneurs in Energy Efficiency and
Demand Response marketplaces
Support California’s billion dollar rebate and incentive programs
Entrepreneurs benefit from customer incentives, participate as a
third-party implementer, or receive development support
13
What are we looking for?
NEW or UNDERUTILIZED technologies that deliver
INCREMENTAL savings:
• Save energy
• Reduce peak demand
• Create behavior change
Must show:
• Verifiable and sustainable savings
• Commercial availability
• Market barriers addressed
• Scalable to large market
• Align with DSM Program Portfolio and
California Long Term Strategic Plan
14
Utilities achieve energy savings
through “Programs”
All “Measures” implemented through “Programs”
Program Portfolio Includes:
• Energy Efficiency Programs
• Demand Response Programs
Programs Span:
• State-wide or utility-specific
• Upstream (i.e. manufacturer), midstream (e.g. retail or
channel) or down-stream (end user)
• All market segments: consumer, commercial, industrial,
hospitality, agriculture, etc.
• Deemed and customized
15
Measure
Type
Energy
Savings Incentive Examples
Deemed Fixed Fixed
TVs, LED Streetlights,
CFLs, White Goods.
Food Service Technology
Customized
(“Calculated”) Variable Variable
Agricultural Pump, Boiler
Burner
Measure combines Energy Savings with Incentives
16
Market Channels (direct & indirect)
Low Income
3rd Party “3P”
Solution
Partners
Pay for performance
Solution Turn-key
Direct Install
Direct
PG&E’s
Energy Solutions
& Service (ES&S)
Organization
Government
&
Community
Partnerships
Residential SMB Commercial Industrial Agriculture Communities
Retail
Manufacturer
Trade
Alliances
contractors
architects
designers
Distributor
Energy Efficiency, Demand Response, Rates, Education, Information
Pro
gra
ms
C
han
nels
C
usto
mer
Seg
men
ts
PG&E’s 2013-14 Portfolio Structure
17
Statewide Programs
Local Programs
* Low Income EE funding requested in Low Income Filing.
** Third-Party Programs included in market sectors.
Customer
Agricultural Industrial Commercial Residential*
Local and Regional Government Partners
Institutional Government Partners
Third-Party Programs**
Marketing Education and Outreach
Wo
rkfo
rce
Ed
uc
atio
n a
nd
Tra
inin
g
Co
de
s a
nd
Sta
nd
ard
s
Lig
htin
g
Em
erg
ing
Te
ch
no
log
ies
Fin
an
cin
g
Sta
tew
ide
Inte
gra
tion
18
Programs
• Price-responsive
• Reliability
Sample Program Components
• kW load reduction
• Contract period
• Eligibility (e.g. size, meter)
• Firm Service Level
• Curtailment window
• Event trigger
• Notification time
• Incentive payment
• Non-compliance penalties
• Enabling technology
PG&E Demand Response Portfolio
Business Programs
• Aggregator (retail, bilateral)
• Optional Bidding Mandatory Curtailment
• Scheduled Load Reduction
• Base Interruptible
• Demand Bidding Program (DBP)
• Peak Day Pricing
Residential Programs
• SmartAC
• SmartRate
Enabling Technology Programs
• Automated Demand Response
• Permanent Load Shifting
19
Automated Demand Response (ADR)
Program
Helps customers investment in energy management
technologies that enable them to perform Demand
Response (DR). Includes:
• Incentives for DR-enabling technologies based on total
curtailable load;
• Project scoping, screening, auditing, and other technical
services as needed;
• Process management to help customers along each step of
program to successfully receive full incentives.
20
Automated Demand Response (ADR)
Customer Benefits include:
• Increased control and flexibility of their building
operations/processes;
• Lower utility bills through strategic management of their
building operations, hedging against potentially higher peak
demand rate charges
• Incentives can make projects more financially viable since up
to 100% of project costs can be recovered for DR-enabling
technology
• Additional incentives and greener brand through
participation in eligible DR programs
21
From Emerging Technologies
to Measures
Product Managers
Emerging Technologies
Core Products
CPUC / ED TPS
(Technical Product Support)
Product Launch
Product Managers
• Responsible
for identifying:
• market
needs
• technologies
that need
savings
verifications
• product
portfolio
needs
• Recommends
ET projects
Emerging Technologies
• Performs due
diligence to:
• assess
market
adoption
potential
• verify
energy
savings
• identify
impacts
(positive and
negative)
• Identify key
issues of
emerging/un
derutilized
technologies
Core Products
• Receives ET
results and
works with
internal
groups (i.e.
PD&A, TPS,
EM&V) to
make go/no
go decision to
pursue
measure
• Pursues
SPARC*
approval
CPUC / ED
• TPS engages
ED for early
opinion
mechanism to
discuss
proposed
work paper
• ED shares
desired data
points and
concerns
TPS (Technical
Product Support)
• Works with
product
managers to
develop work
papers for
measures
• Works with
ED in iterative
process of
work paper
creation
Product Launch
• Upon work
paper
approval,
product can
be launched
as a deemed
measure and
PG&E can
claim savings
* SPARC (Smart Products And Rewarded Customers): internal PG&E phased gate product development and governance process
22
Roadmap into Utilities Programs
New Technology, Idea, Product, Service or Tool
Idea Review
Screen
ET Assessment
Internal Program & Product Governance
Customized Incentive
Deemed Incentive
3rd Party Programs
Adoption by Programs
23
Technology Stages / Actions
Upstream ET Program
TRIO workshops
Technical review
Lab testing
Identify specifications
Stage 1: Unverified / Unavailable
Concept, Alpha or Beta Product.
Stage 2: Unverified / Available
May be sales, but not part of existing CA utility programs.
Stage 3: Verified / Available
Similar products on market already being sold in the
market.
ET Program
TRIO workshops
Idea Card
ET Assessment (Field/Lab)
Open Forum
Certifications
Existing Programs or 3rd Party Implementers
TRIO Workshops
ET Assessment
3rd Party Programs
Incentives
Customized Program
Solution Codes
Future Codes & Standards
24
ET Program Activities
Scan/Screen to identify new technologies for all customer segments
Assess manufacturer’s claims:
• literature search
• laboratory evaluations
• field studies
Analyze and compile findings and forward recommendations for adoption
www.ETCC-CA.com
25
Research Ecosystem
26
Road to Adoption
R&D to Proof of Concept
To Prototype
To Production Prototype
To Certification
& Specs Early Sales
Volume Sales
S A B C EXIT Seed Round Round Round
DoE Demonstration & Project Finance
Visa, Master Card, Amex, home equity loan, friends & family
Seed VC
Early VC Late VC & Private Equity Angels
Banks
Corporate VC
CEC PIER, DoE, SBIR, CARB, SCAQMD
Corporate R&D / Industry Partners Fu
nd
ing
Emerging Technologies (ET) Utility Programs
Codes & Standards
Uti
lity
Pro
gra
ms
Test Centers
TRIO – Technology, Resources, Incubation, Outreach
Tech Assessments
Scale Field Placements
Market & Behavioral Studies
Demonstration Showcases
Technology Development Support
Open Forum
Utility Programs (Utility Idea)
3rd Party Programs (Your Idea)
Incentives & Rebates
On-Bill-Financing
Reach Codes
Fed & State Stand. Codes
27
Road to Adoption
Emerging Technologies (ET) Utility Programs
Codes & Standards
Uti
lity
Pro
gra
ms
Test Centers
TRIO – Technology, Resources, Incubation, Outreach
Tech Assessments
Scale Field Placements
Market & Behavioral Studies
Demonstration Showcases
Technology Development Support
Open Forum
Utility Programs (Utility Idea)
3rd Party Programs (Your Idea)
Incentives & Rebates
On-Bill-Financing
Reach Codes
Fed & State Stand. Codes
SCREEN Assess
Emerging Technologies (ET) Utility Programs
Codes & Standards
Uti
lity
Pro
gra
ms
Test Centers
TRIO – Technology, Resources, Incubation, Outreach
Tech Assessments
Scale Field Placements
Market & Behavioral Studies
Demonstration Showcases
Technology Development Support
Open Forum
Utility Programs (Utility Idea)
3rd Party Programs (Your Idea)
Incentives & Rebates
On-Bill-Financing
Reach Codes
Fed & State Stand. Codes
Transfer
1-3 Months 6-24 Months 6-12 Months
28
Screen • Conduct a detailed review
• Research market & technical potential
• Evaluate rationale of offering technology as an energy-saving “measure”
• Prepare scope and budget for further investigation, if appropriate ____________________________
• Opportunity Summary
• 1 month
Evaluate • Review, score and prioritize ideas
• Approve or reject project and funding at monthly meeting
• Evaluate potential collaboration with IOUs, SMUD, PIER, etc. ____________________________
• Executive Summary
• 1 month
Scan • Company submits technology brief
/ business plan
• Utility scans the market for new or underutilized technologies
• Utility selects commercially viable ideas for additional screening ____________________________
• Idea Proposal Form
• 1 month
Se
lec
t
Plan • Determine data requirements and
equipment tests
• Establish methodology, protocols
• Develop detailed plan ____________________________
• Project Plan
• 1 month
Execute • Establish baseline
• Test new technology
• Install monitoring equipment
• Interpret and analyze data ____________________________
• Tracking Data
• 3-12 months
Resource • Enlist customer(s)
• Select site(s)
• Engage consultant(s) ____________________________
• Project Documents (Customer Agreement, Contract, etc.)
• 4-6 months
As
se
ss
Prepare • Draft report
• Solicit review and feedback
• Revise and prepare final report ____________________________
• ET Project Report
• 2 months
Publish • Publish to ETCC website
• Enter in ETCC database ____________________________
• 1.5 months
Transition • Present summary to utility’s “New
Ideas” committee
• Prepare work paper and cost-effectiveness calculations ____________________________
• 6 months Re
po
rt /
Tra
ns
itio
n
ET Adoption Process
Ahmed Abdullah, ET Manager, SDG&E
Aaron Panzer, ET Manager, PG&E
Paul Delaney, ET Manager, SCE
Bruce Baccei, ET Manager, SMUD
30
Screen • Conduct a detailed review
• Research market & technical potential
• Evaluate rationale of offering technology as an energy-saving “measure”
• Prepare scope and budget for further investigation, if appropriate ____________________________
• Opportunity Summary
• 1 month
Evaluate • Review, score and prioritize ideas
• Approve or reject project and funding at monthly meeting
• Evaluate potential collaboration with IOUs, SMUD, PIER, etc. ____________________________
• Executive Summary
• 1 month
Scan • Company submits technology brief
/ business plan
• Utility scans the market for new or underutilized technologies
• Utility selects commercially viable ideas for additional screening ____________________________
• Idea Proposal Form
• 1 month
Se
lec
t
Plan • Determine data requirements and
equipment tests
• Establish methodology, protocols
• Develop detailed plan ____________________________
• Project Plan
• 1 month
Execute • Establish baseline
• Test new technology
• Install monitoring equipment
• Interpret and analyze data ____________________________
• Tracking Data
• 3-12 months
Resource • Enlist customer(s)
• Select site(s)
• Engage consultant(s) ____________________________
• Project Documents (Customer Agreement, Contract, etc.)
• 4-6 months
As
se
ss
Prepare • Draft report
• Solicit review and feedback
• Revise and prepare final report ____________________________
• ET Project Report
• 2 months
Publish • Publish to ETCC website
• Enter in ETCC database ____________________________
• 1.5 months
Transition • Present summary to utility’s “New
Ideas” committee
• Prepare work paper and cost-effectiveness calculations ____________________________
• 6 months Re
po
rt /
Tra
ns
itio
n
Scan, Screen & Evaluate
31
Scan
• Company submits technology brief / business plan
• Utility scans the market for new or underutilized technologies
• Utility selects commercially viable ideas for additional screening ____________________________
• Idea Proposal Form: www.ETCC-CA.com
• 1 month
32
Scan: Idea Proposal Form
33
Screen
• Conduct a detailed review
• Research market & technical potential
• Evaluate rationale of offering technology as an energy-saving “measure”
• Prepare scope and budget for further investigation, if appropriate ____________________________
• Opportunity Summary
• 1 month
34
Screen : Opportunity Summary
Overview
• Background
• Estimated project cost
Project Plan
• Project core idea, description, and methods
• Defined scope and tasks
• Expected results
• Start / end dates
• Status of project
• PIER connection
• Contractors identified
• Host
Technology status
• Technology status/maturity
• Time to market
Market & energy/demand opportunity
• Product features
• Market segments
• Plausible energy and demand impacts for an individual unit or service, compared to alternative technologies
• Estimated energy savings from existing cases studies
Value proposition summary
• Source to develop value proposition
• Assessment of value to California ratepayers
Sustainability / environmental impact
Scoring
• Market size
• Program relevance
• Estimated market penetration
35
Evaluate
• Review, score and prioritize ideas
• Approve or reject project and funding at monthly meeting
• Evaluate potential collaboration with IOUs, SMUD, PIER, etc. ____________________________
• Executive Summary
• 1 month
36
Evaluate: Executive Summary
Refrigeration Heat Reclaim
Summary
The objective of this project is to evaluate heat recovery from refrigeration system for space heating in supermarkets. This project will identify opportunities to capture savings, select optimal configuration that minimizes impact on refrigerant change, and validate therms savings. Successful validation will help introduce technology to retrofit and new construction projects. Targeted at grocery superstores and potentially, industrial sector. Recently added as part of 2013 Title 24 for supermarkets, applicable to new construction.
Key Metrics, Impacts, Strategies
• There are about 1,350 supermarket stores in PG&E’s service territory that could benefit from this technology.
• Average 15,000 therms* savings per store per year, PG&E addressable market 20,250,000 therms.
• Vendor will provide design assistance, recommend sizing, hardware and HVAC integration; participate in calibration, commissioning and testing.
• Safeway will pay all hardware and incremental cost of contractors/vendors.
Request of SPARC Governance Team (Go/No Go)
• Sept 2012 – Dec. 31, 2013, Budget $80K
37
Screen • Conduct a detailed review
• Research market & technical potential
• Evaluate rationale of offering technology as an energy-saving “measure”
• Prepare scope and budget for further investigation, if appropriate ____________________________
• Opportunity Summary
• 1 month
Evaluate • Review, score and prioritize ideas
• Approve or reject project and funding at monthly meeting
• Evaluate potential collaboration with IOUs, SMUD, PIER, etc. ____________________________
• Executive Summary
• 1 month
Scan • Company submits technology brief
/ business plan
• Utility scans the market for new or underutilized technologies
• Utility selects commercially viable ideas for additional screening ____________________________
• Idea Proposal Form
• 1 month
Se
lec
t
Plan • Determine data requirements and
equipment tests
• Establish methodology, protocols
• Develop detailed plan ____________________________
• Project Plan
• 1 month
Execute • Establish baseline
• Test new technology
• Install monitoring equipment
• Interpret and analyze data ____________________________
• Tracking Data
• 3-12 months
Resource • Enlist customer(s)
• Select site(s)
• Engage consultant(s) ____________________________
• Project Documents (Customer Agreement, Contract, etc.)
• 4-6 months
As
se
ss
Prepare • Draft report
• Solicit review and feedback
• Revise and prepare final report ____________________________
• ET Project Report
• 2 months
Publish • Publish to ETCC website
• Enter in ETCC database ____________________________
• 1.5 months
Transition • Present summary to utility’s “New
Ideas” committee
• Prepare work paper and cost-effectiveness calculations ____________________________
• 6 months Re
po
rt /
Tra
ns
itio
n
Assess
38
Plan
• Determine data requirements and equipment tests
• Establish methodology, protocols
• Develop detailed plan ____________________________
• Project Plan
• 1 month
39
Plan: Project Plan
40
Resource
• Enlist customer(s)
• Select site(s)
• Engage consultant(s) ____________________________
• Project Documents (Customer Agreement, Contract, etc.)
• 4-6 months
41
Resource: Formal Agreements
• Customer Agreement
• Vendor Contracts
42
Execute
• Establish baseline
• Test new technology
• Install monitoring equipment
• Interpret and analyze data ____________________________
• Tracking Data
• 3-12 months
43
Execute: Tracking Data
Networking Break
30 Minutes
ET Adoption Process
(continued)
Ahmed Abdullah, ET Manager, SDG&E
Aaron Panzer, ET Manager, PG&E
Paul Delaney, ET Manager, SCE
Bruce Baccei, ET Manager, SMUD
46
Screen • Conduct a detailed review
• Research market & technical potential
• Evaluate rationale of offering technology as an energy-saving “measure”
• Prepare scope and budget for further investigation, if appropriate ____________________________
• Opportunity Summary
• 1 month
Evaluate • Review, score and prioritize ideas
• Approve or reject project and funding at monthly meeting
• Evaluate potential collaboration with IOUs, SMUD, PIER, etc. ____________________________
• Executive Summary
• 1 month
Scan • Company submits technology brief
/ business plan
• Utility scans the market for new or underutilized technologies
• Utility selects commercially viable ideas for additional screening ____________________________
• Idea Proposal Form
• 1 month
Se
lec
t
Plan • Determine data requirements and
equipment tests
• Establish methodology, protocols
• Develop detailed plan ____________________________
• Project Plan
• 1 month
Execute • Establish baseline
• Test new technology
• Install monitoring equipment
• Interpret and analyze data ____________________________
• Tracking Data
• 3-12 months
Resource • Enlist customer(s)
• Select site(s)
• Engage consultant(s) ____________________________
• Project Documents (Customer Agreement, Contract, etc.)
• 4-6 months
As
se
ss
Prepare • Draft report
• Solicit review and feedback
• Revise and prepare final report ____________________________
• ET Project Report
• 2 months
Publish • Publish to ETCC website
• Enter in ETCC database ____________________________
• 1.5 months
Transition • Present summary to utility’s “New
Ideas” committee
• Prepare work paper and cost-effectiveness calculations ____________________________
• 6 months Re
po
rt /
Tra
ns
itio
n
Report and Transition
47
Prepare
• Draft report
• Solicit review and feedback
• Revise and prepare final report ____________________________
• ET Project Report
• 2 months
48
Prepare: ET Project Report
49
Publish
• Publish to ETCC website
• Enter in ETCC database ____________________
• 1.5 months
http://www.etcc-ca.com/
50
Transition
• Present summary to utility’s “New Ideas” committee
• Prepare work paper and cost-effectiveness calculations ____________________________
• Program Implementation Plan (PIP), Work Paper, E3, DEER
• 6 months
Networking Lunch
60 Minutes
Program Development
Primer
Steve Blanc, Supervisor
Technical Product Support
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
53
Utility Product Development
Lifecycle
Define Plan Execute
Ideate Evaluate Develop Validate Launch Sunset
Market Test
Go/No Go
Develop Go/No Go G1
Launch
Go/No Go
G2 G3
Sunset Go/No
Go S
ET
I
New Idea*
Go/No Go
Scan Screen Assess
Emerging Technology* Sunset
*Not all new ideas go through ET, but all ET go
through SPARC
If Idea is successful, it moves to SPARC for G1
Review S
54
From Emerging Technologies
to Measures
Product Managers
Emerging Technologies
Core Products
CPUC / ED TPS
(Technical Product Support)
Product Launch
Product Managers
• Responsible
for identifying:
• market
needs
• technologies
that need
savings
verifications
• product
portfolio
needs
• Recommends
ET projects
Emerging Technologies
• Performs due
diligence to:
• assess
market
adoption
potential
• verify
energy
savings
• identify
impacts
(positive and
negative)
• Identify key
issues of
emerging/un
derutilized
technologies
Core Products
• Receives ET
results and
works with
internal
groups (i.e.
PD&A, TPS,
EM&V) to
make go/no
go decision to
pursue
measure
• Pursues
SPARC*
approval
CPUC / ED
• TPS engages
ED for early
opinion
mechanism to
discuss
proposed
work paper
• ED shares
desired data
points and
concerns
TPS (Technical
Product Support)
• Works with
product
managers to
develop work
papers for
measures
• Works with
ED in iterative
process of
work paper
creation
Product Launch
• Upon work
paper
approval,
product can
be launched
as a deemed
measure and
PG&E can
claim savings
* SPARC (Smart Products And Rewarded Customers): internal PG&E phased gate product development and governance process
55
The Work Paper
Section Content
1 General measure
and baselines
• Description
• Baseline data
• Estimated Useful Life
• Net to Gross
2 Calculation
methods
• Energy Demand & Gas Savings
• Variables: building type/vintage, climate zone (defined at ww.deeresources.com)
3 Load shapes • Base Case and Measure Load Shapes
4 Base case and
measure costs
• Base, Incremental & Full Measure Cost
56
Program Implementation Plan (PIP)
57
E3 Calculator
Californian utilities use the “E3 Calculator” to compute benefits
and all costs, including avoided costs, to satisfaction of the
CPUC.
The E3 Calculator can be found at www.ethree.com/cpuc4.php
Primary societal benefits of EE and DR are "avoided costs" of
building and operating power plants, transmission and
distribution lines, and other facilities.
58
E3 Calculator Concept
Hourly
Avoided
Costs
($/kWh) Hourly
Shape
(kWh/hr)
Hourly
Benefits
($/hr)
X
=
Qtr 1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4
Avoided generation and T&D cost for
service area. Both energy and capacity
costs.
“Shape” for the new measure for a specific segment and climate
zone
59
DEER
Q&A
Aaron Panzer, PG&E
Ahmed Abdullah, Sempra
Paul Delaney, SCE
Bruce Baccei, SMUD