Supplement Information
Effect of Naphtha Diluent on Greenhouse Gases and
Reduced Sulfur Compounds Emissions from Oil
Sands Tailings
Kathleen F. Gee, Ho Yin Poon, Zaher Hashisho and Ania C. Ulrich*
Address correspondence to Ania C. Ulrich, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G2W2, Canada. Tel: 780-492-8293; E-mail: [email protected]
Word Count: 248 with 3 figures and 2 tables.
Page S4. Table S1: Concentration for non-metal and trace metal in the surrogate pond water Page S5. Table S2: List of primers and conditions used for DsrAB and MCR PCR amplification Page S6. Table S3: Relative abundance of selected sulfur reducing bacteria and methanogens Page S7. Figure S1: Dissolved organic carbon, and carbon dioxide measurements for the PW and SPW groups Page S8. Figure S2: Carbonyl sulfide, butyl mercaptan, and thiofuran concentrations for the PW and SPW groups
Page S9. Figure S3: 2-methylthiophene, 2-methylthiophene, 2,5-dimethylthiophene concentrations for the PW and SPW groups
S1
1
2
3
4
5
6
789
10
11
12131415161718
1920
Detailed condition for Gas analysis
CH4 and CO2 productions in the mesocosms were measured by removing 50 μL headspace gas
and analyzing it with a 7890A gas chromatograph with a thermal conductivity detector (GC-
TCD) equipped with Supelco, 80/100 Hayesep Q column, 10 FT x 1/8 IN SS. Helium 5.0
(Praxair) was the carrier gas. Method parameters were the following: Inlet temperature and total
flow (200 oC and 15 mL/min); detector temperature and reference flow (200 oC and 30 mL/min);
and oven temperature was 25 oC (hold 3 minutes).
For sulfur gas analysis of hydrogen sulfide, carbonyl sulfide, thiofuran, butyl mercapatan, 2-
methylthiophene, 3-methylthiophene, and 2,5-dimethylthiophene, RSCs were analyzed using a
7890A GC and an Agilent Technologies 355 sulfur chemiluminescence detector (GC-SCD)
equipped with a DB-1 column from Agilent Technologies (part no. 123-1035). Hydrogen 5.0 and
Ultra zero air from Praxair were used for the SCD. Method parameters were the following: Inlet
temperature, total flow and split ratio (210 oC, 15 mL/min, 5:1); H2 flow rate, 39 sccm; Air flow
rate, 59.7 sccm; oven temperature, 30 oC for 3 mins; and ramp 15 oC/min to 185 oC. RSCs were
measured by injecting 5 mL gas samples into the SCD. If dilution was required, headspace gas
was diluted in 40 mL EPA vials filled with 5.0 nitrogen gas and sealed with Mininert caps. The
sulfur gas standard (Air Liquide) has the following component concentrations: hydrogen sulfide
(151 ppmv); carbonyl sulfide (5.09 ppmv), thiofuran (15.3 ppmv), butyl mercaptan (10.1 ppmv),
2-methylthiophene (91.6 ppmv), 3-methylthiophene (40.7 ppmv), and 2,5-dimethylthiophene
(61.1 ppmv).
Sulfate Reduction Rates Calculation
S2
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
The averaged SO42- concentration measurement was converted from mg/L to mol/L. Moles of
SO42- was calculated by multiplying SO4
2- concentration by the water volume inside the
mesocoms. The SO42- change (in moles) was then divided by the volume of MFT in mesocoms
and days between samples taken.
¿
¿
¿¿
Illumina MiSeq sequencing
Total metagenomic DNA was submitted to PCR amplification of the V4 hypervariable regions of
bacterial 16S rRNA genes, using the primers 515F (5ʹ-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3ʹ) and
806R (5ʹ-GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT-3ʹ). Both forward and reverse primers were tagged
with adapter, pad and linker sequences. Each barcode sequence (12 mer) was added to the
reverse primer for pooling multiple samples in one run of MiSeq sequencing. The PCR
conditions were 95 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min
of extension, followed by 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were purified and combined in
equimolar ratios with the quantitative DNA binding method in order to create a DNA pool that
was further used for sequencing from the adaptor. The 16S rRNA gene fragments were
sequenced using the Illumina Miseq platform following the manufacturer procedure. The
sequences were deposited in SRA within the study with accession number PRJ. Sequences were
sorted out according to their barcode tags and trimmed to remove sequencing adaptors and
primers. After removing the low quality sequences, operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were
defined and assigned to taxa using UPARSE pipeline. The community matrix was normalized
with the DESeq package. The bacterial communities were ordinated with non-matric
multidimentsion scaling (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis distance matrix using phyloseq.
S3
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Table S1: Concentration for non-metal and trace metal in the surrogate pond water
Non-metal Compound
Concentration
(mg/L) Trace MetalConcentration (mg/L)
NH4Cl 16.4 Cr 0.0064KCl 28.1 Mn 0.0407NaCl 584.4 Co 0.0013MgSO4 56.7 Ni 0.0095Na2SO4 552.0 Cu 0.0054NaHCO3 1308.2 Zn 0.0071CaCl2 57.5 As 0.0132NaF 6.5 Se 0.0053KBr 0.5 Cd 0.0001SrCl26H2O 2.4 Sb 0.0015LiCl 1.7 Ba 0.3653
Mo 0.1180Ag 0.0001Ba 2.8900Si 3.0000
S4
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Table S2: List of primers and conditions used for DsrAB and MCR PCR amplification.
Primers Condition
DsrDSR1F - ACS CAC TGG AAG CAC G
DSR4R - GTG TAG CAG TTA CCG CA
28 cycle (98 °C-10s, 55 °C-10s, 72 °C-
1min)
mcr
A
F – TAY GAY CAR ATH TGG YT
R – ACR TTC ATN GCR TAR TT
38 cycle (98 °C-10s, 50 °C-30s, 72 °C-
30s)
16S
F –
TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATA
A
GAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCA
G
R –
GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTAT
AA
GAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTA
ATCC
S5
81
Table S3: Relative abundance of selected sulfur reducing bacteria and methanogens.
Desulfobulbaceae Desulfobacteraceae Desulfuromonadaceae
Desulfomicrobiaceae Methanoregulaceae Methanotrichaceae
MFT week 0 1.74E-02 9.93E-03 1.35E-02 1.25E-03 2.70E-02 1.58E-02
Week 5
MFT-PW 7.37E-02 2.45E-02 1.40E-02 9.20E-03 4.92E-02 1.74E-02MFT-PW-0.8% 1.01E-01 2.61E-02 1.41E-02 6.32E-03 6.69E-02 2.03E-02MFT-SPW 6.33E-02 2.64E-02 2.20E-02 1.33E-02 3.74E-02 3.90E-02MFT-SPW-0.2% 6.87E-02 4.96E-02 6.79E-03 2.21E-03 1.08E-01 5.07E-02MFT-SPW-0.8% 6.25E-02 2.86E-02 2.03E-02 3.44E-02 5.12E-02 4.82E-02MFT-SPW-1.5% 8.19E-02 2.25E-02 1.68E-02 1.09E-02 4.38E-02 3.35E-02
Week 11
MFT-PW 1.11E-01 2.73E-02 1.13E-02 9.19E-03 7.15E-02 4.85E-02MFT-PW-0.8% 7.15E-02 2.66E-02 5.85E-03 4.39E-03 1.03E-01 5.65E-02MFT-SPW 4.25E-02 2.97E-02 1.11E-02 2.77E-03 7.27E-02 3.73E-02MFT-SPW-0.2% 7.87E-02 1.91E-02 1.43E-02 4.59E-03 6.00E-02 1.61E-02MFT-SPW-0.8% 2.69E-02 1.37E-02 2.41E-02 3.27E-02 3.57E-02 1.39E-02MFT-SPW-1.5% 7.02E-02 2.08E-02 1.77E-02 1.80E-02 4.11E-02 1.65E-02
Values indicate abundance in percentage of total reads.
S6
82
8384
Figure S1: Dissolved organic carbon, and carbon dioxide measurements for the PW and SPW groups over the 11-week study period. The values for the methane measurement, MFT (PW, SPW, and SPW-0.2%) are averages from duplicate measurements. For all other mesocosms, only one measurement is represented. Filled circles: PW or SPW +0.8% diluent; open diamonds: +MFT; open triangle: +MFT/+0.2% diluent, open square: +MFT/+0.8% diluent; x: +MFT/+1.5% diluent
S7
8586878889909192
Figure S2: Carbonyl sulfide, butyl mercaptan, and thiofuran concentrations for the PW and SPW groups over a 14-week study period. The values for butyl mercaptan (PW-0.8% at W0) and thiofuran (PW-0.8%, all; MFT-SPW-0.8% at W6; MFT-PW-0.8% at W4 and W14; MFT-SPW-0.8% at W4; and MFT-SPW-1.5% at W4) represent one measurement. All other values are averages from duplicate measurements and the error bars (where visible) represent plus and minus one standard deviation. Filled circles: PW or SPW +0.8% diluent; open diamonds: +MFT; open triangle: +MFT/+0.2% diluent, open square: +MFT/+0.8% diluent; x: +MFT/+1.5% diluent
S8
93
949596979899
100101102
Figure S3: 3-methylthiophene, 2-methylthiophene, 2,5-dimethylthiophene concentrations for the PW and SPW groups over a 14-week study period. Filled circles: PW or SPW +0.8% diluent; open diamonds: +MFT; open triangle: +MFT/+0.2% diluent, open square: +MFT/+0.8% diluent; x: +MFT/+1.5% diluent
S9
103
104105106107108109