Tentative ASW Timeline - 2014 -

2015

September 10 DPI will extract course code data from PowerSchool

September 17 Teachers access schedule information in ASW Platform to complete a practice validation of their schedules

September 15 – 26 Window for districts to correct teacher schedule information

September 29 DPI will extract final course code data from PowerSchool

October 1 Teachers access schedule information in ASW Platform to complete the final validation of their schedules**Teachers on a semester schedule will validate their second semester schedule data in late January, 2015.

The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester.

The timeline below represents a TENTATIVE ASW Timeline for the Fall 2014 semester.

October 1 – 15 Teachers validate their schedules and principals approve. Teachers receive the classes for which they will collect evidence

October 15 Final Deadline for schedule validation and class selection by the online platform

October 15 – Jan. 2 Evidence Collection Window for Semester 1

January 5 Semester 1 Student Selection/Evidence Upload Window Opens

January 20 Semester 1 Evidence Upload Window Closes

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

Overview: Analysis of Student Work ASW Process

Pre TestSljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf

sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf

Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.

Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk

Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe

ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf

sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf

Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.

Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk

Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe

ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf

sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf

Collection Method Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting:

Pre TestSljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf

sdfllsdf sdflnsdf sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf

sdf

Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf

sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0

lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljkLjdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;lj

kw klwe ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf

Sljd

Collection Method → File Size

Up to 10 MB per file!

The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review

ED M

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise.

Blind Review

If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year.

Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

M

Blind Review

M

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.

M

Reviewer #3

Blind Review

E

2-Step ASW Process ReviewThese will be explained in detail in later modules.

#1Evidence Collection Checklist

#2

ASW Quality Rubric

Blind Review

Summer 2015

Content area specialists complete the review process.

Blind Review

Qualifications Application Training

• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth

• M = Meets Expected Growth

• E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection

Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection

Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Evidence Collection Rating Form:

TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5

Does Not Meet Meets ExceedsD D D D D M M M M M E E E E ED D D D E M M M M E M E E E ED D D D M D M M M M M M E E ED D D E E M M M E E D E E E ED D D M E D D M M M D M E E ED D D M M D M M M E D D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E

Receive Rating

• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Evidence Collection Rating Form:

TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5   

Receive Rating

D M M M E

Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating

a

Receive Rating

aDoes Not Meet Meets Exceeds

D D D D D M M M M M E E E E E

D D D D E M M M M E M E E E E

D D D D M D M M M M M M E E E

D D D E E M M M E E D E E E E

D D D M E D D M M M D M E E E

D D D M M D M M M E D D E E E D D M M E

D D M E E

D M M E E

Fall 2015

Teachers receive their Standard 6 ratings for 2014-2015.

Receive Rating

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Online Platform Tour

Choosing Objectives

Lessons Learned from Pilots

• Work together across content areas

• Focus on the philosophy behind the standards and objectives and how to assess them in your classroom

• Know your guidance chart and standards well