+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and...

TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and...

Date post: 23-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
1 | Page TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study of the Prevention and control non communicable diseases (Diabetes & Hypertension) in Imenti South Sub County, Meru County Implemented by the Kenya Red Cross Society in collaboration with MOH and County Government of Meru Funded by: Danish Red Cross, Date of this terms of Reference (12 th June 2019)
Transcript
Page 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

1 | P a g e

TERMS OF REFERENCE

for the Baseline Study

of the

Prevention and control non communicable diseases (Diabetes &

Hypertension) in Imenti South Sub County, Meru County

Implemented by the Kenya Red Cross Society in collaboration with MOH and

County Government of Meru

Funded by: Danish Red Cross,

Date of this terms of Reference (12th June 2019)

Page 2: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

2 | P a g e

1. Summary

1.1. Purpose: The primary purpose of the baseline study is to describe the current status

of Non communicable diseases (NCD) and levels of access to critical NCD services in

the targeted communities in Imenti South Sub County, Meru County. The baseline

will provide benchmark statistics against the programme indicators, against which

programme progress, perfomance and impact will be gauged.

1.2. Partners: Kenya Red Cross Society and Danish Red Cross

1.3. Duration: 30 days

1.4. Estimated Dates: 8th July 2019 to 6th August 2019

1.5. Geographical Location: Imenti South Sub County, Meru County

1.6. Target Population: Population of 179,604 which includes Community members and

stakeholders within targeted locations, project staff.

1.7. Deliverables: Inception report and tools shared and presented, first and second

drafts and final report plus all data sets.

1.8. Methodology: Cross sectional study triangulated by qualitative methodologies

1.9. Baseline Study Management Team: KRCS M&E and program representatives, and

PNS representative

2. Background Information

Project Objectives

The overall objective is to contribute to reduction of the preventable burden, morbidity,

mortality and costs due to Non-communicable diseases and promote the well-being of the

Kenyan population by providing evidence based NCD prevention and control interventions

in order to ensure optimal health throughout the life course for sustainable socioeconomic

development by the year 2025.

The immediate objective is to improve primary and secondary prevention of Non

communicable diseases (Diabetes and Hypertension) through strengthening of the

continuum of care and advocacy in Imenti South Sub-county, Meru County.

Page 3: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

3 | P a g e

The specific objectives/outputs are to: (See annex 1 for results framework)

1. To increase NCD knowledge and practice of healthy lifestyles in Imenti Sub-County,

Meru County.

2. To improve early detection of NCD through introduction of NCD screening in the

existing health care system.

3. To enhance advocacy for NCD policies at the county and national level.

4. To build the capacity of MOH and KRCS at the county and national level on management

and implementation of NCD programs in Kenya.

The findings and the baseline data, contained in the Baseline Survey Report, will provide a

starting point for the program and the basis by which performance, progress, achievement

and impact will be measured during and after the project life. As well, the findings will

enable the project team to review the project plans to ensure that they have realistic and

evidence based targets, strategies and timeframes in lieu of the objectives and indicators.

The programme will be implemented in close coordination with the MoH at National and

County Level and with the involvement of the communities at the sub county level as the

programme objectives are in line with the Sub County Annual Operational Plans, thus

making the MoH a strategic stakeholder in the programme. In addition, the programme is

supporting the implementation of the Community Health Strategy, which is major priority

for the MoH. The MoH hosts coordination meetings with other health stakeholders in

Nairobi, a forum in which the KRCS is represented.

At the community level, the programme will be implemented by community health

volunteers supervised by the CHCs with links to the health system. The programme staff will

work closely and coordinate with the volunteers, committees and the relevant MoH staff.

Page 4: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

4 | P a g e

3. Study Purpose & Scope

3.1 Purpose: State the broad and specific objectives

The study aims to establish baseline information against the projects agreed indicators

which will be used as a threshold for this project to assess impact. This should include a KAP

survey that establishes the baseline on the indicators set for knowledge, attitude and

practice. The specific objectives of the baseline study be to:

1. Examine the current knowledge levels, Attitude and practices of the targeted

populations concerning the NCDs of interest.

2. To establish level of NCD service provision and uptake at the community level.

3. To generate the benchmark values of all the log frame indicators.

4. To determine the current level of implementation of NCD policies and plans by the

health authorities at the county and national government levels.

5. Examine community preferable approaches of engagement in relation to their

participation in the project and feedback mechanism.

4. Study criteria and Key questions

Baseline values: What is the current coverage of the log frame outcome indicators?

Relevance:

o Does the community realize the need for the project?

o How relevant will the interventions be to county/national government

priorities

Expected Outcomes: What will be the anticipated changes? Whether positive or

negative?

Gender and disability mainstreaming: To what extent should gender equity and

disability mainstreaming issues be integrated throughout the project cycle?

Sustainability: What measures should be put in place to ensure sustainability of the

project (consider institutional, environmental, financial, socio cultural)

Community Engagement and Accountability

Page 5: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

5 | P a g e

o How would the community wish to be involved in the project?

o To what extent is the Community Engagement and Accountability (CEA)

integrated in the project design?

o How can Community Engagement and Accountability best be put in place in

the project design, to:

Ensure that the project set-up take into account the changing

community needs and risks in their political, social, economic and

physical contexts

Ensure that the communities understand the project and all its

systems and are up to date with project implementation status and

plans.

Ensure communities participate in the project decision making.

5. Study Methodology

The Baseline Study shall employ the cross sectional study design where quantitative,

qualitative and spatial methodologies will be used to reach its findings. For every indicator,

every quantitative piece of data must be qualified by its corresponding qualitative and

spatial data. That means that the study, especially for the qualitative aspect must employ

participatory methodologies and also try to link the health challenge and solution to their

physical environment and geographical area to the location level. Quantitative data must be

collected using mobile phones.

6. Study Quality & Ethical Standards

The consultant shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the study is designed and

conducted to respect and protect the rights and welfare of the people and communities

involved and to ensure that the study is technically accurate and reliable, is conducted in a

transparent and impartial manner, and contributes to organizational learning and

accountability. Therefore, the study team shall be required to adhere to the study standards

and applicable practices as recommended by International Federation of Red Cross and Red

Crescent Societies.

Page 6: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

6 | P a g e

Utility: Study must be useful and used.

Feasibility: Study must be realistic, diplomatic, and managed in a sensible, cost

effective manner.

Ethics & Legality: Study must be conducted in an ethical and legal manner, with

particular regard for the welfare of those involved in and affected by the study.

Impartiality & Independence; Study should be impartial, providing a comprehensive

and unbiased study that takes into account the views of all stakeholders.

Transparency: Study activities should reflect an attitude of openness and

transparency.

Accuracy: Study should be technically accurate, providing sufficient information

about the data collection, analysis, and interpretation methods so that its worth or

merit can be determined.

Participation: Stakeholders should be consulted and meaningfully involved in the

study process when feasible and appropriate.

Collaboration: Collaboration between key operating partners in the study process

improves the legitimacy and utility of the study.

It is also expected that the study will respect the seven Fundamental Principles of the Red

Cross and Red Crescent: 1) humanity, 2) impartiality, 3) neutrality, 4) independence, 5)

voluntary service, 6) unity, and 7) universality.

7. Qualifications and Experience for Consultants

The lead consultant must possess the following qualifications:

1. A master’s degree in Public Health.

2. Proven experience in NCD programming and evaluations.

3. Must have led in at least five participatory studies. Experience of conducting

baselines and working in the target or similar communities (preferred)

4. High level of professionalism and an ability to work independently and in high-

pressure situations under tight deadlines.

Page 7: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

7 | P a g e

5. Strong interpersonal and communication skills

6. The team must have a statistician familiar with SPSS for data management.

7. Firm must have experience in using mobile phone technology for data collection,

monitoring and reporting

8. The lead consultant must have strong analytical skills and ability to clearly synthesize

and present findings, draw practical conclusions, make key recommendations and to

prepare well-written reports in a timely manner.

9. Availability for the period indicated.

8. Management of the Baseline Study

Duration: The Baseline Study shall be conducted for 30 working days to be completed by

mid-July 2019.

Deliverables:

1. Inception report detailing the Baseline Study design, sampling methodology & survey

tools, agreed budget and work plan.

2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data.

3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline will be

presented at a feedback meeting at HQ to be held after completing the draft report

4. Dissemination and validation presentation to the County Stakeholders teams.

5. Final Baseline Survey Reports.

6. Copies of original and cleaned data sets with codebook. The raw data, the database

which has been cleaned (both qualitative and quantitative, including original field

notes for in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, as well as recorded audio

material), should be submitted together with the report. A simple inventory of

material handed over will be part of the record. KRCS & DRC will have sole

ownership of all final data and any findings shall only be shared or reproduced with

the permission of KRCS.

Evaluation Management Team: The evaluation management team shall consist of KRCS

MEA&L Unit Representative, KRCS NCD Program Manager, Danish Red Cross Representative

Page 8: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

8 | P a g e

as well as the Meru County MoH Representative. They shall ensure that the deliverables

agreed upon and approved in the inception report are achieved on time.

Role of KRCS (project and MEA&L team)

Lead the recruitment and evaluation process.

Coordinate the evaluation implementation process through the KRCS M&E unit.

Review of evaluation products including the log frame, tools and reports.

KRCS will organize logistics for the evaluation team.

Avail data collectors within agreed criteria.

Avail all necessary documents for desk review.

KRCS will be the link between the community, donor and the consultant

Will be the custodian of all data generated from the study

Organize dissemination forums as necessary

Role of Danish Red Cross

Participate in the TOR development and recruitment process

Review and give feedback on all baseline products

Fund the activity budget

Final approval of the report

9. Application Requirements

To apply, the consultant shall prepare in writing both technical and financial proposals and

submit them adhering to the outline in annex 1. The financial proposal MUST BE SENT IN A

SEPARATE ENVELOP FROM THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

Please also note that the people whose names appear in the team composition template

MUST be the ones to undertake the study. As such, they MUST be the ones to appear in

person if the proposal moves to the interview stage.

Failure to adhere to any of these requirements will lead to automatic disqualification or

breach of contract if the work has begun.

Page 9: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

9 | P a g e

Kenya Red Cross Society reserves the right to cancel the contract if, convinced that the

consultant is in breach of the terms and conditions including those approved in the

inception report.

10. Submission of proposal

The technical and financial proposals addressed to the Chairperson, tender committee,

Kenya Red Cross Society, P.O Box 40712-00100 Nairobi should be submitted by 26th June

2019 at 12noon.

The Technical Proposal MUST comply with the outline provided in Annex 1 while the

financial proposal shall conform to the template provided in Annex 2. Team

composition should conform to Annex 3

Bidders should provide a technical and financial proposal in two separate envelopes

clearly marked “Technical Proposal” and “Financial Proposal” and sealed in one plain

envelope clearly marked “Tender No. PRF05203 “Call for Consultancy for Baseline

“Prevention and Control of NCDs for Healthy Lifestyle Project

ANNEX 1: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL FOMART

1) Introduction: description of the firm, the firm’s qualifications and statutory compliance

(1 page)

2) Back ground: Understanding of the project, context and requirements for services, Key

questions (2 pages)

3) Proposed methodology - Indicate methods to be used for each indicator and highlight

any areas where indicators may need adjustment. The targeted respondents should be

indicated for each indicator. Proposed detailed questions should be indicated. Detailed

sampling procedure needs to be indicated. (5 pages)

4) Firms experience in undertaking assignments of similar nature and experience from the

geographical area for other major clients (Table with: Name of organization, name of

assignment, duration of assignment (Dates), reference person contacts-2 pages

Page 10: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

10 | P a g e

5) Proposed team composition (As per annex 3)-1 page

6) Work plan (Gantt chart of activity and week of implementation)-1 page

NB: Evidence of past reports done and statutory documents to be availed during the oral

phase.

ANNEX 2: BUDGET TEMPLATE

The consultant shall only quote for the items below as KRCS will manage all other related

costs (Logistics and payment of enumerators)

Item Unit # of

Units

Unit

Cost Total Cost (Ksh.)

Consultancy Fee (for the whole study

period)

Per day

Office expenses (Printing, photocopy,

binding, communication costs etc.)

lump sum

Grand Total

ANNEX 3: PROPOSED TEAM COMPOSITION TEMPLATE

Name of Team Member Highest Level of

Qualification

General Years of

Experience related

to the task at

hand

Roles under this

assignment

Page 11: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

11 | P a g e

ANNEX 4: TENDER STUDY CRITERIA

A three stage study procedure will be used to evaluate all proposals from bidders. The total

number of points which each bidder may obtain for its proposal is:

Technical Proposal 60 marks

Oral presentation 30 marks

Financial Proposal 10 marks

1. Study of the Technical Proposal

The technical proposal shall be evaluated on the basis of its responsiveness to the TOR.

Specifically, the following criteria shall apply:

Study Criteria Maximum

Points

Possible

Bidders

score

Remarks

(1) Introduction:

Description of the Firm and the Firm’s

Qualifications

Detail of Legal Compliance

5

(2) Background : Understanding of the project,

context and requirements for services

10

(3) Proposed Methodology: The proposed

methodology MUST provide an indication of its

effectiveness and added value in the proposed

assignment.

20

(4) Firms Experience in undertaking assignments

of similar nature and experience from related

geographical area for other major clients

Provide a summary and supporting

information on overall years of experience,

and related technical and geographic

coverage experience.

10

Page 12: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

12 | P a g e

(5) Proposed Team Composition:

Tabulate the team composition to include

the general qualifications, suitability for the

specific task to be assigned and overall

years of relevant experience to the

proposed assignment.

The proposed team composition should

balance effectively with the necessary skills

and competencies required to undertake

the proposed assignment.

Lead Consultant Qualifications – should be

as per the TOR

Mandatory-statistician

10

(6) Work Plan: A Detailed logical, weekly work plan

for the assignment MUST be provided.

5

TOTAL SCORE 60

Total scores of the technical bid analysis shall be converted to a denominator of 60. Top

three firms will go to the orals and financial review stage. If we get only three bids, then

they all go to the oral stage and financials.

Name of Consultant

Criteria Score Remarks

Understanding of the assignment

(5 Marks)

Clear and scientific methodology

(15 Marks)

Page 13: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

13 | P a g e

Presentation of

Detailed CVs of team to be involved

Evidence of legal Compliance-

Registration, PIN certificate, tax

compliance etc.)

two Sample reports of previous

assignments

(5 marks)

Referee’s’ feedback (5 Marks)

2. Study of the Financial Proposal

The Financial Proposal shall be prepared in accordance to Annex 2. The maximum number

of points for the Financial Proposal shall be 10% (10 points). This maximum number of

points will be allocated to the lowest Financial Proposal. All other Financial Proposals will

receive points in inverse proportion according to the below formula:

Points for the Financial Proposal being evaluated =

(Maximum number of points for the financial proposal) x (Lowest price)

Price of proposal being evaluated

A total score obtained including both Technical and Financial Proposals is calculated for each

proposal. The bid obtaining the overall highest score is the winning bid.

Page 14: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

14 | P a g e

Annex 1: Results framework

Overall Objective: To contribute to reduction of the preventable burden, morbidity, mortality and costs

due to Non-communicable diseases and promote the well-being of the Kenyan population by providing

evidence based NCD prevention and control interventions in order to ensure optimal health throughout

the life course for sustainable socioeconomic development by the year 2025.

Immediate

Objective: To

improve primary

and secondary

prevention of Non

communicable

diseases (Diabetes

and Hypertension)

through

strengthening of

the continuum of

care and advocacy

in Imenti South

Sub-county, Meru

County

E1: % of target population 18+ years with

high BMI (defined as body mass index ≥ 25

kg/m² for overweight and body mass index ≥

30 kg/m² for obesity) disaggregated by age

and gender

Health

facility

records

1. There will be

adequate supply of

drugs, equipment,

staff and

consumables

throughout the life

of the project for

the relevant

activities. That is

there will be no

industrial action or

tarnsfers or other

dynamics that will

cause huge turnover

of health

workers/volunteers.

2. The Health

Management

Information System

(HMIS) is

functioning

adequately enough

to provide accurate,

complete, precise

timely and

verifiable data and

E2: % of target population 18+ years with

raised blood pressure(defined as systolic

blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic

blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) disaggregated by

age and gender

Health

facility

records

P1: #/% of target population that have gained

access to prevention, treatment and care

services through the project disaggregated by

type of service, gender and age

Evaluation

P2: # of target population 18+ with raised

blood pressure and/or high BMI

disaggregated by gender and age

Health

facility

records

E4: % of targeted population that have

received t MoH recommended routine NCD

tests

Health

facility

records

P3: # of target population reached by the

project disaggregated by gender and age

Activity

reports

Output 1: Increased

knowledge of

diabetes and

hypertension and

Practice of healthy

E1 % population aware of Risk Factors to

Diabetes and Hypertension and how to

prevent/manage them disaggregated by age,

gender, occupation and NCD status

Evaluation

E2% of target population with improved Evaluation

Page 15: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

15 | P a g e

lifestyles in Imenti

South Sub-county

dietary practices /E3 % of target population

with improved physical activity practices

information for

decisions for the

project and its

results. This

includes adequate

tools for data

recording,

aggregation

summary and

analysis into the

DHIS as well as the

required SCHRIO.

3. The community

health units are

fully functional as

per the CHS

functionality

checklist.

4. Peace and

tranquility will

prevail in the sub

county and in

Kenya. That means

that there will be no

violent conflict and

its effects such as

population

movement among

others.

Process 2%3: # health workers trained in NCD

prevention and care aggregated by gender +

# of CHW trained in NCD prevention and care

aggregated by gender

Activity

reports

# of target population identified with risk

factors and referred for screening

Health

facility

records

P: # of community sessions on promotion of

healthy lifestyle implemented according to

plan

Activity

reports

Output 2:Improved

early detection,

screening and

diagnosis of

diabetes and

hypertension by

enhancing

integration of NCD

screening into

existing healthcare

systems

Process 3: Percentage of NCD patients seen

regularly at clinics e.g. Four times a year.

Health

facility

records

Process/End line: #% of target population

screened for BP and raised glycose

Facility

records

Process: # of patients in treatment for for an

NCD condition at the health facility

Facility

records

Process: Number of people who do regular

home monitoring of blood glucose and blood

pressure e.g. daily or weekly.

Evaluation

Output 3: Enhanced

Advocacy and

contribution to

policy for NCD

programming at

County and

National level

End line 1: % increase in funds allocation of

NCDs programmes by the county government

County

budget

End line 2: Level (%) of operationalizing of the

NCD strategies and policies as per the

planned timeliness.

Evaluation

Process 1: Number of adopted National NCD

policies, guidelines, strategies etc. adopted

by the target sub-county by type and target

group

Evaluation

Page 16: TERMS OF REFERENCE for the Baseline Study · 2019. 6. 13. · 2. Draft Baseline Study Report and all raw data. 3. A power point presentation highlighting key findings from the baseline

16 | P a g e

Process 2: Number of goodwill ambassador

advocating for NCD programming in the

county

Evaluation 5. There will be no

largescale

emergencies that

may divert skills and

resources and

therefore slow

down the

achievement of

results.

Output 4: Enhanced

KRCS and MOH (at

sub county level)

capacity for NCD

management and

implementation

End line 1: Percentage of project objectives

that perform at over 91% of the set quarterly

and annual targets

Evaluation

End line 2: Proportion of the target

population receiving quality health care

services

Evaluation

Process 1: Number of the staff supported to

attend NCD related technical trainings and

conferences

Mission

Reports

Process 2: Number of new NCD partnerships

established

Signed

agreement

Output 5:Inspire

DRC partner

National Societies

in Africa to engage

in NCD

programming

focusing on

prevention and care

End line 1:% level participants who

understand the NCD burden and risk factors

as well as RCRC added value in this

workshop

evaluation

report

End line 2: % level of completion of NCD

programming plan of action for DRC in Africa

PoA

Process 1: Number of workshops conducted

to disseminate the NCD programming plan of

action for DRC in Africa.

Workshop

reports

Process 2: # of project concepts (2 pager)

developed and received seed funding to

start implementing in 2019

concepts

notes


Recommended