Date post: | 01-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | vuongthien |
View: | 226 times |
Download: | 2 times |
NCHRP 9-45NCHRP 9-45
Test Methods and Specification Criteriafor Mineral Filler Used in HMANCHRP 9-45
Hussain U. Bahia
University of Wisconsin – Madison
NCAUPG MeetingFebruary 2-3, 2011, Columbus , Ohio
NCHRP 9-45
Research Team – NCHRP Project 9-45
•Results are based on NCHRP Project :– Test Methods and Specification Criteria for Mineral
Filler Used in HMA
•Research Team:– MTE - Gerry Reinke and Erv Dukatz
– UIUC - Imad Al Qadi
– UW-Madison - Ahmed Faheem, Cassie Hintz & Hussain Bahia
NCHRP 9-45
Objectives of the NCHRP Study
(1)Identify or develop test methods for mineral fillerthat characterize its mechanical and chemicaleffects on the performance of :
(a) mastics and
(b) hot mix asphalt (HMA)
(2) Recommend specification criteria for mineralfiller that optimize HMA performance
Project started in 2007, draft final is under review
NCHRP 9-45
Do binders or mastics control HMAperformance?
Stiff particle
In Collaboration with Prof. Rod Lakes UW- Madison
•Fillers & modifiers affect all aspect of masticbehavior
NCHRP 9-45NCHRP 9-45
Fillers’EffectsVary
Problem Statement:Predicting effects of fillers
• Fillers vary in their effects onbitumen properties
• Einstein Model for DilutedComposites (1911):
– ηr = 1 + KEøηr= Viscosity of mastic/ viscosity of (Binder)
KE= Einstein Constant ~2.5
Ø: Filler volume fraction
ηr
Ø Volume conc. of filler
NCHRP 9-45
Basic Concept of Study:Fillers’ Interaction with Binders (Tunnicliff in 1960)
1. Filler2. Asphalt adsorbed layer3. Asphalt layer affected by adsorption
Gradient of stiffening
Important Filler Properties:1.Geometry , and 2.Composition
NCHRP 9-45NCHRP 9-45
Conceptual Model –Binder& Filler Interaction (Faheem et al. 2008 )
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 20 40 60
80
Filler Volume Fraction (%)
G*
rati
o
In this region, filler particlesare separated enough by thefree asphalt volume
Co
nc
en
trate
d
Dilu
ted
1. Initial Stiffening Rate,2. Critical Filler Concentration, 3.Terminal Stiffening Rate
3
2
1 At this concentration the transitionis due to the consumption of “FreeAsphalt”
G* Ratio vs. Filler Volume Fraction
NCHRP 9-45
Important Filler Properties – 1. Geometry
• Fillers’ geometry can be defined by four measurements:
–Size, shape, angularity, & texture.
Last 3 are difficult to measure individually.
–A good indicator of all is (Packing)
–Fractional Voids (also called Rigden Voids)
•Two Secondary : Absorption & Specific Gravity
NCHRP 9-45
Rigden Voids -- Fixed & Free binder
• Rigden voids’ content
– Volume percentage of voids in a dry, compacted filler sample
• Higher Rigden voids leads to higher stiffening of binder
NCHRP 9-45
RIGDEN VOIDS (BS 812, EN 1097-4)
NCHRP 9-45
New Rigden Voids Device by Gilson
NCHRP 9-45
New Device by Instrotek
NCHRP 9-45
Important Filler Properties – 2. Composition
•There appears to be a small number of chemicalcompounds that affect asphalt-filler interactions.
•Two main properties are important:
– Reactivity
Calcium compound.
Water solubility.
– Harmful fines
Active Clay Content.
Organic Content.
NCHRP 9-45
Filler Mineralogical Types Selected
Filler Type
1.Andesite2.Basalt
3.Caliche4.Dolomite5.Granite
6. Limestone1.Hydrated Lime
2.Fly Ash
3.Slag
• Natural Fillers
•Imported Fillers
NCHRP 9-45
Distribution of Rigden VoidsCan be grouped by Mineralogy
25
30
35
40
45
50
Rig
de
nV
oid
s(%
)
Average
NCHRP 9-45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Filler Type
Composition Variation of Fillers
Al2O3 CaO FeO K2O MgO SiO2
NCHRP 9-45
Asphalt Binders for Producing Mastics
• (a) PG 64-22 with low asphaltenes
– (from a light crude source)
• (b) PG 64-22 with high asphaltenes
– (from a heavy crude source)
• Binder (a) modified with PPA to a PG 76-22
• Binder (a) modified with SBS to a PG 76-22
• All mastics prepared at 1:1 ratio by mass
NCHRP 9-45
Distribution of Volume Fraction@ 1:1 ratio by mass
0.20
0.22
0.24
0.26
0.28
0.30
Vo
lum
eF
rac
tio
n(%
)
± One StandardDeviation (0.01)
Average
NCHRP 9-45
Mastic & Mixture Testingand Analysis of Results
NCHRP 9-45
Mastic Properties Measured
1. Workability measure:
Viscosity: 135°C at 1 – 50 RPM
2. Rutting:
MSCR Jnr, %Recovery, 58°C, 64°C, at 0.1, 3.2,10kPa
3. Fatigue:
G*.Sinδ, and Time Sweep, 25°C and 10Hz
4. Low Temp Cracking:
S, m, at -12°C, Cracking temperature (ABCD)
5. Moisture Damage
Pull Off Test, 24hr moisture conditioning at 60°C
NCHRP 9-45
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
NoFille
r
AN1
BH1
BH2
CA2
DH1
DS2
GH1
GH2
GRQ2
GS1
GS2
LH1
LS2
FAC2
FAF1 FS2
HL2
Visc
osity
(cP)
Filler
Flint Hills
PPA
SBS
Valero
Average
Legend:1st Letter: Filler 2nd / 3rd Letter:A:Andesite FS: Furnace Slag H: HardB: Basalt G: Granite S: Soft
C: Caliches GRQ: Gravel Quartzite 4th/5th Letter:D: Dolomite HL: Hydrated Lime 1: Source 1FA: Fly Ash 2: Source 2
Natural Manufactured
Viscosity at 135 C
NCHRP 9-45
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
FDH
1
FGH
2
FGS2
FLH
1
PFA
C2
PG
RQ
2
PG
S1
PH
L2
SAN
1
SCA
2
SDS2
SFS2
VB
H2
VC
A2
VG
RQ
2
VG
S1
Nu
mb
er
of
Gyr
atio
ns
to9
2%
Max
imu
mD
en
sity
Mastics
Coarse
Fine
Flint Hills +
PPA PG 70-22
Flint Hills +
SBS PG 70-22Valero
PG 64-22
Flint Hills
PG 64-22
Legend:1st Letter: Binder 2nd Letter: Filler 3rd/4th Letter:
F: Flint Hills A: Andesite FS: Furnace Slag H: HardV: Valero B: Basalt G: Granite S: SoftP: PPA C: Caliches HL: Hydrated Lime 4th/5th Letter:S: SBS D: Dolomite 1: Source 1
FA: Fly Ash 2: Source 2
Filler type can increasecompaction resistance( N92 ) By 100%
NCHRP 9-45
0.01
0.10
1.00
10.00
No
Fille
r
AN1
BH1
BH2
CA2
DH1
DS2
GH1
GH2
GRQ
2
GS1
GS2
LH1
LS2
FAC2
FAF1 FS2
HL2
Jnr(
1/kP
a)
Filler
Flint Hills
PPA
SBS
Valero
Average
Legend:1st Letter: Filler 2nd / 3rd Letter:
A:Andesite FS: Furnace Slag H: HardB: Basalt G: Granite S: Soft
C: Caliches GRQ: Gravel Quartzite 4th/5th Letter:D: Dolomite HL: Hydrated Lime 1: Source 1
FA: Fly Ash 2: Source 2
Natural Manufactured
MSCR test: Effects of fillers on Jnr
Jnr is 10 times lowerDue to type of filler
NCHRP 9-45
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
No
Fille
r
AN1
BH1
BH2
CA2
DH1
DS2 GH1
GH2
GRQ
2
GS1
GS2
LH1
LS2
FAC2
FAF1 FS2
HL2
%Re
cove
ry
Filler
Flint Hills
PPA
SBS
Valero
Average
Legend:1st Letter: Filler 2nd / 3rd Letter:
A:Andesite FS: Furnace Slag H: HardB: Basalt G: Granite S: Soft
C: Caliches GRQ: Gravel Quartzite 4th/5th Letter:D: Dolomite HL: Hydrated Lime 1: Source 1
FA: Fly Ash 2: Source 2
Natural Manufactured
MSCR - % Recovery @ 3.2 KPa
NCHRP 9-45
Jnr at 58°C and 3.2kPa –Compare effects of modifiers + fillers
0.1
1.0
10.0
Jnr
(1/k
Pa)
PPA
SBS
Valero
Increasing Rigden Voids
PG 64
PG 76
NCHRP 9-45
Prediction of Mastic Jnr
The best fit regression equation at ( 1:1 binder to filler) is:
Mastic Jnr = 1.19 + 0.156 Binder Jnr - 0.0273 Rigden Voids
Predictor Coef SE Coef T P
Constant 1.1934 0.2248 5.31 0.000
Binder Jnr 0.15590 0.02193 7.11 0.000
Rigden Voids -0.0272 0.005632 -4.84 0.000
S = 0.123381 R-Sq = 74.7% R-Sq(adj) = 72.7%
NCHRP 9-45
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
FDH
1
FFA
C2
FFS2
FGH
2
PCA
2
PDS2
PFA
F1
PLS2
SAN
1
SBH
2
SGR
Q2
SGS2
VG
H1
VG
S1
VH
L2
VLH
1
Flow
Num
ber
Mastics
Coarse
Fine
Flint Hills +
PPA PG 70-22
Flint Hills +
SBS PG 70-22
Valero
PG 64-22
Flint Hills
PG 64-22
Legend:1st Letter: Binder 2nd Letter: Filler 3rd/4th Letter:
F: Flint Hills A: Andesite FS: Furnace Slag H: HardV: Valero B: Basalt G: Granite S: Soft
P: PPA C: Caliches HL: Hydrated Lime 4th/5th Letter:S: SBS D: Dolomite 1: Source 1
FA: Fly Ash 2: Source 2
Mixture Flow Number (FN)
Mix FN canVary by 6 timesDue to filler type
NCHRP 9-45
Effects on Mixture Rutting ResultsMeasured by FN (Coarse Mixtures)
Coarse: Correlation Between Mixture and
Mastic Rutting Indicators
y = -1037.1x + 1379.9
R2 = 0.652
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Mastic Jnr (1/kPa)
Mix
ture
Flo
wN
um
be
r
NCHRP 9-45
Deriving Mastic Jnr LimitsFor Acceptable Rutting Resistance
• Mixture (FN) Limits derived from NCHRP 9-33 Recommendations:
• Corresponding Mastic Jnr Limits:
Traffic Level (Million ESALs) Minimum Flow Number @ 200kPa< 3 -----------
3 to < 10 53010 to < 30 1,900
≥ 30 7,400
Mixture Gradation Maximum Mastic Jnr at 3.2kPa (1/kPa)
Fine 0.41Coarse 0.62
NCHRP 9-45
Limits on Measured or PredictedMastic Jnr (@ 3.2 Kpa) Propose limits on Mastic Jnr as measured or
predicted. Jnr < 0.5 1/Kpa
Best fit regression analysis:
Jnr (mastic) = 2.05 + 0.166 Binder Jnr - 0.0162 RigdenVoids - 4.67 Volume Fraction
Predictor T P
Constant 5.38 0.000
Binder Jnr 10.71 0.000
Rigden Voids -5.97 0.000
Volume Fraction -3.84 0.000
S = 0.136097 R-Sq = 70.9% R-Sq(adj) = 69.5%
NCHRP 9-45
Effects on Low TemperatureCracking
Measured
1.S, m for mastics
2. Creep Stiffness and Strength for mixtures
NCHRP 9-45
Mastic Stiffness at -12°C
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900St
iffn
ess
at-1
2°C
MP
a
Flint Hills
PPA
SBS
Valero
Increasing Rigden Voids
Filler effect is importantBut filler type is (NOT)
NCHRP 9-45
Relative m-value at -12°C
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
Re
lati
vem
-val
ue
at-1
2°C Flint Hills
PPA
SBS
Valero
Increasing Rigden Voids
Filler effect is importantBut filler type is (NOT)Binder Modification is most important
NCHRP 9-45
ANOVA Analysis for Mixture Stiffnessat -12 C
Variable F-Value P-Value
Gradation 55.21 0.000
Binder Source 17.34 0.000
Binder Modification 0.35 0.708
Filler Mineralogy 0.37 0.946
R2 = 62.31%•Binder type (source) & aggregate gradation are most important.•Binder modification and fillers are insignificant.•Some fillers may negate or even reverse the effect of the bindermodification ( e.g. PPA binder with soft limestone).
NCHRP 9-45
ANOVA Analysis for Mixture Strengthat -12 C
Variable F-Value P-Value
Gradation 5.84 0.019
Binder Source 1.38 0.246
Binder Modification 5.08 0.010
Filler Mineralogy 1.96 0.065
R2 = 39.80%
Binder modification is the most significant factorwhile filler effects are only marginal.
NCHRP 9-45
So, What ‘s New?
•Measure Rigden Voids
•Measure Specific Gravity
•Change mixture design procedure to include
– Volume fraction of fillers rather than dust to binderratio
– Caution about modifiers and fillers combinations
NCHRP 9-45
Recommended specification criteria formineral fillers that optimize HMA performance
Perform.Indicator
MasticProperty
MasticLimit
Mastic Models
WorkabilityRel. Viscosity
@135ºC<5.00
Mastic Vis. =- 8244 + 4.68Binder Viscosity + 205 Rigden
Voids
RuttingJnr @3.2kPa -58ºC, (1/kPa)
< 0.40 Mastic Jnr = 1.01 + 0.160
Binder Jnr - 0.0230 Rigden Voids
Low TemperatureRelative Stiffness @60 Seconds and
@-12ºCNo Limits
Mastic Stiffness = 145 + 2.32 Binder Low Temp Stiff +4.84 Rigden Voids – 1.71 CaO%
Moisture Damage Pull off strength No Limits No acceptable Model
FatigueG*sin(delta),
Number of Cycles to FailureNo Limits No acceptable Model
• Because of high binder-filler interaction,criteria is based on Mastic testing
NCHRP 9-45
Recommended specification criteria formineral fillers that optimize HMA performance
Perform.Indicator
MasticProperty
MasticLimit
Mastic Models
WorkabilityRel. Viscosity
@135ºC<5.0
Mastic Vis. =- 8244 + 4.68Binder Viscosity + 205 Rigden
Voids
RuttingJnr @3.2kPa -58ºC, (1/kPa)
< 0.40 Mastic Jnr = 1.01 + 0.160
Binder Jnr - 0.0230 Rigden Voids
LowTemperature
Relative Stiffness @60Seconds and @-12ºC
NoLimits
Mastic Stiffness = 145 + 2.32 BinderLow Temp Stiff + 4.84 Rigden Voids
– 1.71 CaO%
MoistureDamage
Pull off strengthNo
LimitsNo acceptable Model
FatigueG*sin(delta),
Number of Cycles toFailure
NoLimits
No acceptable Model
NCHRP 9-45
RIGDEN VOIDS (BS 812, EN 1097-4)
NCHRP 9-45
Acknowledgment
•NCAUPG Organizers
– Dr. McDaniel
•NCHRP
– Dr. Ed Harrigan and the Project Panel
•Asphalt Research Consortium- FHWA. WRI