+ All Categories
Home > Documents > TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0...

TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0...

Date post: 09-Nov-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
62
Client: Product Designation: Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003 Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 All services undertaken are subject to the following general policy: This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to copy or distribute this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by A2LA, NIST, or any agency of the US Government. Tested by: Tests performed by: Report reviewed by: Standard: Michael J. Alvarado Senior Project Engineer Chris D. Capelle Senior Project Engineer Hayward Pool Products One Hayward Industrial Drive Clemmons, NC 27012 Contact: Carl Davidson Phone: 336.712.9900 TEST REPORT April 29, 2010 Intertek Testing Services NA Inc. 1950 Evergreen Blvd., Suite 100 Duluth, GA 30096 EN 55014-1 2000 +A1 +A2 2002: Electromagnetic compatibility - Part 1: Emissions EN 55014-2: 1997 +A1: 2001 + A2: 2008 - Electromagnetic compatibility - Part 2: Immunity EN 61000-3-2:2006 EN 61000-3-3:1995 +A1:2001 +A2:2005 Page 1 of 62 EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003
Transcript
Page 1: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

Client:

Product Designation: Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Report Number: 100034923ATL-003

All services undertaken are subject to the following general policy: This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client. Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to copy or distribute this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by A2LA, NIST, or any agency of the US Government.

Tested by:

Tests performed by: Report reviewed by:

Standard:

Michael J. AlvaradoSenior Project Engineer

Chris D. CapelleSenior Project Engineer

Hayward Pool ProductsOne Hayward Industrial Drive

Clemmons, NC 27012Contact: Carl DavidsonPhone: 336.712.9900

TEST REPORT

April 29, 2010

Intertek Testing Services NA Inc.1950 Evergreen Blvd., Suite 100

Duluth, GA 30096

EN 55014-1 2000 +A1 +A2 2002: Electromagnetic compatibility - Part 1: EmissionsEN 55014-2: 1997 +A1: 2001 + A2: 2008 - Electromagnetic compatibility - Part 2: ImmunityEN 61000-3-2:2006EN 61000-3-3:1995 +A1:2001 +A2:2005

Page 1 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 2: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

2.0 Test Summary

1.0 Introduction and Conclusion

Test DateTest Full Name ResultSection

System setup including cable interconnection details, support equipment and simplified block diagram. (System Setup)4.0

Criterion used to evaluate the Performance of the Equipment when tested against the immunity requirements for the European CE Mark (CE Immunity Verification)

5.0

04/27/2010Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006) PASS6.0

04/27/2010Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06) PASS7.0

04/27/2010Measurement of Terminal Disturbance Voltages (EN 55014-1 (CV)) PASS8.0

04/27/2010Measurement of disturbance power (EN 55014-1 (DP)) PASS9.0

04/28/2010Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01) PASS10.0

04/23/2010Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-4: 2004) (EN 61000-4-4: 2004) PASS11.0

04/23/2010Surge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-5: 2001) (EN 61000-4-5:95 +A1:01) PASS12.0

04/23/2010Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

PASS13.0

04/27/2010Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions and Voltage Variations Immunity Tests (IEC 61000-4-11: 2004) (EN 61000-4-11: 2004) PASS14.0

Radiated, radio-frequency, electromagnetic field immunity test (EN 61000-4-3:02 +A1:02) was waived due to not being applicable to Category II devices.

NA

The tests indicated in section 2.0 were performed on the product constructed as described in section 3.0. The remaining test sections are the verbatum text from the actual data sheets used during the investigation. These test sections include the test name, the specified test Method, a list of the actual Test Equipment Used, documentation Photos, Results and raw Data. No additions, deviations, or exclusions have been made from the standard(s) unless specifically noted.

Based on the results of our investigation, we have concluded the product tested complies with the requirements of the standard(s) indicated. The results obtained in this test report pertain only to the item(s) tested.

Page 2 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 3: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

3.0 Description of Equipment Under Test

Equipment Under Test

Description Manufacturer Model Number Serial Number Swimming Pool Heat Pump Hayward Pool Products SHE3003 21130003102987001

EUT receive date: April 09, 2010 EUT receive condition: Good

Description of EUT provided by Client:The EUT is a swimming pool heat pump, powered by 400VAC, 50 Hertz, 3 Phase AC power.

Description of EUT exercising:The EUT was powered by 400VAC, 50 Hertz, 3 Phase AC power. A reservoir of cold water was used to cycle through the EUT. The heating temperature was set for maximum 95 degrees Fahrenheit (35 degrees Celsius).

Page 3 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 4: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

System setup including cable interconnection details, support equipment and simplified block diagram. (System Setup)

4.0

Method:Record the details of EUTcabling, document the support equipment, and show the interconnections in a block diagram.

EUT

AC Mains

Water Reservoir

Water In

Water Out

A

Block Diagram

Photo:

Page 4 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 5: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

System setup including cable interconnection details, support equipment and simplified block diagram. (System Setup)

4.0

A

None Required

Support EquipmentDescription Manufacturer Model Number Serial Number

EUT 3 Phase AC Mains PowerAC Power 14.27m No NoneDescription

EUT CablingConnection

Length Shielding FerritesID From To

Data:

Page 5 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 6: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Criterion used to evaluate the Performance of the Equipment when tested against the immunity requirements for the European CE Mark (CE Immunity Verification)

5.0

Method:The equipment under test (EUT) is to be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The installation process includes, product assembly, connecting any support equipment, connecting power and configuration of the equipment under test. All unused transmit/receive telecommunication ports should be connected with loop backs. The EUT should indicate normal operation in accordance with the Operation Manual. Photographs showing each port or terminal and its connection should be made.

The EUT is operated by software which exercises the unit in a manner typical of normal operation (i.e. representative data rates, memory access, processor access, etc.). This software also monitors the operation of the unit and provides feedback on the real-time performance. This performance is monitored either by an Ethernet LAN connection, a terminal connected via serial cable to the unit or indicators included on the unit itself. The monitoring details are to be described in the following Results section.

The ability of the system to capture disturbances or degradations in performance is to be verified by inducing a hardware failure (i.e. physically remove an I/O loopback cable, reset an SCP or inject errors). Each classification is to be demonstrated where possible. The results of this verification of the ability of the system to capture these disturbances are to be recorded in the following Results section.

The results from the immunity testing are reported using the following classification criteria:

A) Zero Errors of any kind.B) EUT experiences errors induced by the test, no alarms are generated and continues to operate without operator intervention. Also, the EUT must recover when the stress from the test is removed.C) EUT ceases to function and requires operator intervention to continue.D) EUT is physically damaged.

The letters in the Data tables (A, B, C, D) indicate the criterion to which the EUT complied.

Page 6 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 7: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Criterion used to evaluate the Performance of the Equipment when tested against the immunity requirements for the European CE Mark (CE Immunity Verification)

5.0

Criterion and method used to evaluate EUT performanceThe EUT was powered by 400VAC, 50 Hertz, 3 Phase AC power. A reservoir of cold water was used to cycle through the EUT. The heating temperature was set for maximum 95 degrees Fahrenheit (35 degrees Celsius). Criteria A for this EUT, would be the continuous running to achieve the desired temperature setting (heating of pool water), when it will stop on its own as the water temperature has been heated to the set temperature with no deviation of the desired temperature and continuous operation.

Data:

Page 7 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 8: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Method:CLASSIFICATION OF EQUIPMENTFor the purpose of harmonic current limitation, equipment is classified as follows:Class A:- Balanced three-phase equipment- Household appliances excluding equipment identified as Class D- Tools excluding portable tools- Dimmers for incandescent lamps- Audio equipmentEquipment not specified in one of the other three categories shall be considered Class A equipment.

Class B:- Portable tools- Arc welding equipment which is not professional equipment

Class C:- Lighting equipment

Class D:- Personal computers and personal computer monitors- Television receivers

EQUIPMENT IN A RACK OR CASEWhere individual self-contained items are installed in a rack or case, they are regarded as being individually connected to the mains supply. The rack or case need not be tested as a whole.

TEST CONDITIONS FOR ITEITE is tested with the equipment configured to its rated current. In this case, the equipment, if necessary, may be configured with its power supplies loaded with additional load boards to simulate rated current conditions. Active loads, rather than resistive, should be used to load the power supply if possible.

TEST TIMEThe total test time applied must be sufficient to cover a complete operating cycle of the EUT.

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

AC Power Source/CTS System-Power Analyzer

California Instr. 15003iX-CTS-EOS 310856 11/13/2009 11/13/2010

Application software for Harmonics and Flicker Software CTS 3.0 (v 3.0.19) SW016 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 8 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 9: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 9 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 10: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Current & Voltage Waveforms - Phase A

Plot:

Page 10 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 11: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics & Class A Limit Line-Euro Limits Phase A

Plot:

Page 11 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 12: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Current & Voltage Waveforms - Phase B

Plot:

Page 12 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 13: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics & Class A Limit Line-Euro Limits-Phase B

Plot:

Page 13 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 14: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Current & Voltage Waveforms - Phase C

Plot:

Page 14 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 15: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics & Class A Limit Line-Euro Limits-Phase C

Plot:

Page 15 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 16: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics – Class-A per Ed. 3.0 (2006)(Phase A-Run time)EUT: SHE3003 Pool Heat Pump Tested by: MJA Test category: Class-A per Ed. 3.0 (2006) (European limits) Test Margin: 100 Test date: 4/27/2010 Start time: 1:47:31 PM End time: 2:07:54 PM Test duration (min): 20 Data file name: H-000084.cts_data Comment: G100034923 Customer: Hayward Pool Products Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Test result: Pass Worst harmonic was #28 with 19.50% of the limit.

Current Test Result Summary (Phase A-Run time) Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted THC(A): 0.29 I-THD(%): 3.55 POHC(A): 0.013 POHC Limit(A): 0.301 Highest parameter values during test:

V_RMS (Volts): 229.99 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 87.294 I_RMS (Amps): 23.002 I_Fund (Amps): 9.813 Crest Factor: 4.392 Power (Watts): 1741 Power Factor: 0.781

Voltage Source Verification Data (Phase A-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Highest parameter values during test:

Voltage (Vrms): 229.99 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 87.294 I_RMS (Amps): 23.002 I_Fund (Amps): 9.813 Crest Factor: 4.392 Power (Watts): 1741 Power Factor: 0.781

Harmonics Data - Phase A

Data:

Page 16 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 17: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics – Class-A per Ed. 3.0 (2006)(Phase B-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Test result: Pass Worst harmonic was #8 with 22.46% of the limit.

Current Test Result Summary (Phase B-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted THC(A): 0.328 I-THD(%): 3.700 POHC(A): 0.013 POHC Limit(A): 0.285 Highest parameter values during test:

V_RMS (Volts): 229.91 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 85.322 I_RMS (Amps): 24.722 I_Fund (Amps): 10.512 Crest Factor: 5.960 Power (Watts): 1740 Power Factor: 0.730

Voltage Source Verification Data (Phase B-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Highest parameter values during test:

Voltage (Vrms): 229.91 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 85.322 I_RMS (Amps): 24.722 I_Fund (Amps): 10.512 Crest Factor: 5.960 Power (Watts): 1740 Power Factor: 0.730

Harmonics Data - Phase B

Data:

Page 17 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 18: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Harmonic current emissions (EN 61000-3-2: 2006)6.0

Harmonics – Class-A per Ed. 3.0 (2006)(Phase C-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Test result: Pass Worst harmonic was #10 with 20.98% of the limit.

Current Test Result Summary (Phase C-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted THC(A): 0.239 I-THD(%): 2.294 POHC(A): 0.012 POHC Limit(A): 0.297 Highest parameter values during test:

V_RMS (Volts): 229.88 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 90.445 I_RMS (Amps): 25.804 I_Fund (Amps): 12.000 Crest Factor: 5.615 Power (Watts): 2066 Power Factor: 0.879

Voltage Source Verification Data (Phase C-Run time)Test Result: Pass Source qualification: Distorted Highest parameter values during test:

Voltage (Vrms): 229.88 Frequency(Hz): 50.00 I_Peak (Amps): 90.445 I_RMS (Amps): 25.804 I_Fund (Amps): 12.000 Crest Factor: 5.615 Power (Watts): 2066 Power Factor: 0.879

Harmonics Data - Phase C

Data:

Page 18 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 19: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Method:SUPPLY VOLTAGEThis test is applicable to electrical and electronic equipment having an input current up to and including 16 A per phase and intended to be connected to public low-voltage distribution systems between 220 V and 250 V at 50 Hz line to neutral.

The test supply voltage (open-circuit voltage) shall be the rated voltage of the equipment. If a voltage range is stipulated for the equipment, the EST voltage shall be 230V single-phase or 400 V three-phase. The test voltage shall be maintained within +/- 2 % of the nominal value. The frequency shall be 50 Hz +/- 0.5 %.

TEST CONDITIONS FOR ITEITE is tested with the equipment configured to its rated current. In this case, the equipment, if necessary, may be configured with its power supplies loaded with additional load boards to simulate rated current conditions. If resistive load boards are used, a justification for why active boards will not impact results must be prepared for each EUT.

The EUT shall be configured and exercised in a manner typical of normal operation.

LIMITSThe limits shall be applicable to voltage fluctuations and flicker at the supply terminals of the equipment under test, measured or calculated according to clause 4 under test conditions described in clause 6 and Annex A. Tests made to prove the compliance with the limits are considered to be type tests.

The following limits apply:- the value of Pst shall not be greater than 1,0;- the value of Plt shall not be greater than 0,65;- the value of d(t) during a voltage change shall not exceed 3,3 % for more than 500 ms;- the relative steady-state voltage change, dc, shall not exceed 3,3 %;- the maximum relative voltage change, dmax, shall not exceed; a) 4 % without additional conditions; b) 6 % for equipment which is: - switched manually, or - switched automatically more frequently than twice per day, and also has either a delayed restart (the delay being not less than a few tens of seconds), or manual restart, after a power supply interruption. NOTE The cycling frequency will be further limited by the Pst and Plt limit. For example: a dmax of 6 % producing a rectangular voltage change characteristic twice per hour will give a Plt of about 0,65. c) 7 % for equipment which is:- attended whilst in use (for example: hair dryers, vacuum cleaners, kitchen equipment such as mixers, garden equipment such as lawn mowers, portable tools such as electric drills), or- switched on automatically, or is intended to be switched on manually, no more than twice per day, and also has either a delayed restart (the delay being not less than a few tens of seconds) or manual restart, after a power supply interruption.

In the case of equipment having several separately controlled circuits in accordance with 6.6, limits b) and c) shall apply only if there is delayed or manual restart after a power supply interruption; or all equipment with automatic switching which is energized immediately on restoration of supply after a power supply interruption, limits a) shall apply; for all equipment with manual switching, limits b) or c) shall apply depending on the rate of switching.

Pst and Plt requirements shall not be applied to voltage changes caused by manual switching. The limits shall not be applied to voltage changes associated with emergency switching or emergency interruptions.

OBESRVATION PERIODThe observation period, Tp, for the assessment of flicker values by flicker measurement, flicker simulation, or analytical method shall be:- for Pst, Tp = 10 min;- for Plt, Tp = 2 h.

The observation period shall include that part of the whole operation cycle in which the equipment under test produces the most unfavourable sequence of voltage changes. For the assessment of Pst, the cycle of operation shall be repeated continuously, unless stated otherwise in Annex A. The minimum time to restart the equipment shall be included in this observation period when testing equipment that stops automatically at the end of a cycle of operation which lasts for less than the observation period.

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

AC Power Source/CTS System-Power Analyzer

California Instr. 15003iX-CTS-EOS 310856 11/13/2009 11/13/2010

Application software for Harmonics and Flicker Software CTS 3.0 (v 3.0.19) SW016 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 19 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 20: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 20 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 21: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Psti & Limit Line - Euro Limits - Phase A

Plot:

Page 21 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 22: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Plt & Limit Line - Phase A

Plot:

Page 22 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 23: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Psti & Limit Line - Euro Limits - Phase B

Plot:

Page 23 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 24: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Plt & Limit Line - Phase B

Plot:

Page 24 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 25: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Psti & Limit Line - Euro Limits - Phase C

Plot:

Page 25 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 26: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Plt & Limit Line - Phase C

Plot:

Page 26 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 27: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Flicker Test Summary per EN/IEC61000-3-3 (Phase A-Run time)

EUT: SHE3003 Pool Heat Pump Tested by: MJA Test category: All parameters (European limits) Test Margin: 100 Test date: 4/27/2010 Start time: 2:26:15 PM End time: 4:26:35 PM Test duration (min): 120 Data file name: F-000085.cts_data Comment: G100034923 Customer: Hayward Pool Products

Test Result: Pass Status: Test Completed

Parameter values recorded during the test: Vrms at the end of test (Volt): 227.78 Highest dt (%): -0.15 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Time(mS) > dt: 0.0 Test limit (mS): 500.0 Pass Highest dc (%): 0.00 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Highest dmax (%): -0.10 Test limit (%): 4.00 Pass Highest Pst (10 min. period): 0.064 Test limit: 1.000 Pass Highest Plt (2 hr. period): 0.064 Test limit: 0.650 Pass

Flicker Data Phase A

Data:

Page 27 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 28: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Flicker Test Summary per EN/IEC61000-3-3 (Phase B-Run time)

EUT: SHE3003 Pool Heat Pump Tested by: MJA Test category: All parameters (European limits) Test Margin: 100 Test date: 4/27/2010 Start time: 2:26:15 PM End time: 4:26:35 PM Test duration (min): 120 Data file name: F-000085.cts_data Comment: G100034923 Customer: Hayward Pool Products

Test Result: Pass Status: Test Completed

Parameter values recorded during the test: Vrms at the end of test (Volt): 227.57 Highest dt (%): 0.19 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Time(mS) > dt: 0.0 Test limit (mS): 500.0 Pass Highest dc (%): 0.00 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Highest dmax (%): -0.12 Test limit (%): 4.00 Pass Highest Pst (10 min. period): 0.064 Test limit: 1.000 Pass Highest Plt (2 hr. period): 0.064 Test limit: 0.650 Pass

Flicker Data - Phase B

Data:

Page 28 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 29: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage fluctuations and flicker (IEC 61000: 2005) (EN 61000-3-3:95 +A1:01 +A2:06)7.0

Flicker Test Summary per EN/IEC61000-3-3 (Phase C-Run time)

EUT: SHE3003 Pool Heat Pump Tested by: MJA Test category: All parameters (European limits) Test Margin: 100 Test date: 4/27/2010 Start time: 2:26:15 PM End time: 4:26:35 PM Test duration (min): 120 Data file name: F-000085.cts_data Comment: G100034923 Customer: Hayward Pool Products

Test Result: Pass Status: Test Completed

Parameter values recorded during the test: Vrms at the end of test (Volt): 227.33 Highest dt (%): 0.22 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Time(mS) > dt: 0.0 Test limit (mS): 500.0 Pass Highest dc (%): 0.00 Test limit (%): 3.30 Pass Highest dmax (%): -0.12 Test limit (%): 4.00 Pass Highest Pst (10 min. period): 0.064 Test limit: 1.000 Pass Highest Plt (2 hr. period): 0.064 Test limit: 0.650 Pass

Flicker Data - Phase C

Data:

Page 29 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 30: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of Terminal Disturbance Voltages (EN 55014-1 (CV))8.0

Method:Measurements in the frequency range of 150kHz to 30 MHz shall be performed with a quasi-peak or average detector instrument that meets the requirements of Section One of CISPR 16. An AMN defined in CISPR 16 shall be used. The voltage probe shall be used when measuring on terminals other than mains terminals e.g. load and control terminals.

The methods of Section 6 of EN 55014 are to be used with the EUT operation in accordance with Section 7 of EN 55014. In general, the following conditions apply.

The EUT shall be located so that the distance between the boundary of the EUT and the closest surface of the AMN is 0.8m.

If a flexible mains cord is provided by the manufacturer that is in excess of 1m, the excess cable shall be folded back and forth as far as possible to form a bundle not exceeding 0.4m in length.

The EUT shall be arranged and connected with cables terminated in accordance with the product specification.

Conducted disturbance shall be measured between each current carrying conductor and the reference ground. Each measured values shall be reported.

If EUT is intended for tabletop use, the EUT shall be placed on a table whose top is 0.8m above the ground plane. A vertical, metal reference plane is be placed 0.4m from the EUT. The vertical metal reference-plane is at least 2m by 2m. The EUT shall be kept at least 0.8m from any other metal surface or other ground plane not being part of the EUT. The table shall be constructed of non-conductive materials. Its dimensions are at least 1m by 1.5m, but may be extended for larger EUT.

If EUT is floor standing, the floor standing EUT shall be placed on a horizontal metal ground plane and isolated from the ground plane by up to 12 mm of insulating material. The metal ground plane shall extend at least 0.5m beyond the boundaries of the EUT and had minimum dimensions of 2m by 2m.

TEST SITEThe test site for radiated emissions is located at 1950 Evergreen Blvd, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia 30096.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.150 kHz to 30 MHz: +/- 2.8 dB

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Cable E11, <18GHz Huber-Suhner Sucoflex 104PEA E11 211266 06/19/2009 06/19/2010

EMI Receiver Hewlett Packard 8546A 211505 02/02/2010 02/02/2011

EMI Receiver, Preselector section Hewlett Packard 85460A 015762 02/02/2010 02/02/2011

Excel spreadsheet for conducted emissions tests

Software Excel - CE Worksh SW002 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

LISN Solar Electronics 8028-50-TS-24-BN 213153 10/01/2009 10/01/2010

LISN Solar Electronics 8028-50-TS-24-BN 213033 10/01/2009 10/01/2010

LISN Solar Electronics 8028-50-TS-24-BN 213034 10/01/2009 10/01/2010

LISN Solar Electronics 8028-50-TS-24-BN 213042 10/01/2009 10/01/2010

Tile - software profile for radiated and conducted emissions testing.

Software Tile - Emissions SW006 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 30 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 31: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of Terminal Disturbance Voltages (EN 55014-1 (CV))8.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 31 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 32: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of Terminal Disturbance Voltages (EN 55014-1 (CV))8.0

Conduct ed Emissions Testing

100. 0K 1.0M 10.0M 100. 0M

Frequency (MHz)

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

Am

plit

ude

(dB

uV

)

Oracle Number: G 10003 4923

Company: Haywa rd Pools

10 :41:4 2 AM, Tuesda y, April 27, 2 010

Operator: RCB

Input Power: 23 0VAC/5 0HzSta ndard: E N 5501 1Not es: Heating mode

E UT - Pool HeaterM /N - SHE 3003Class - B

Quasi -Peak L imitAve rage L imitL ine 1 DataL ine 2 DataL ine 3 DataNeutral Data

Conducted Emissions @ 230Vac/50Hz

Plot:

Page 32 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 33: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of Terminal Disturbance Voltages (EN 55014-1 (CV))8.0

Client: Receiver: HP 8546AModel Number: SHE3003 Cables: E11

Project Number: G100034923 LISN 1: 213034 Tested By: RCB LISN 2: 213042

Date: 04/27/2010 LISN 3: 213153 Frequency Range (MHz): .150 - 30.0

Input power: 230Vac/50Hz Limit: CISPR Class BModifications for compliance (y/n): n

A B C D E F G H ILISN Cable LISN Ins.

Number Detector Frequency Reading Loss Loss Net Limit Margin1,2,3,4 (P,QP, A) MHz dBuV dB dB dBuV dBuV dB

1 QP 0.189 26.4 0.6 0.5 27.5 64.3 -36.81 A 0.189 16.0 0.6 0.5 17.1 54.3 -37.21 QP 0.701 28.2 0.6 0.3 29.1 56.0 -26.91 A 0.701 13.7 0.6 0.3 14.6 46.0 -31.41 QP 1.477 21.0 0.6 0.1 21.7 56.0 -34.31 A 1.477 20.4 0.6 0.1 21.1 46.0 -24.92 QP 0.220 23.4 0.6 0.2 24.2 62.8 -38.62 A 0.220 16.8 0.6 0.2 17.6 52.8 -35.22 QP 0.694 35.5 0.6 0.2 36.3 56.0 -19.72 A 0.694 13.2 0.6 0.2 14.0 46.0 -32.02 QP 0.955 27.9 0.6 0.2 28.7 56.0 -27.32 A 0.955 13.6 0.6 0.2 14.4 46.0 -31.63 QP 0.211 52.4 0.6 0.3 53.3 63.2 -9.93 A 0.211 20.7 0.6 0.3 21.6 53.2 -31.63 QP 0.344 50.6 0.6 0.1 51.3 59.2 -7.93 A 0.344 18.4 0.6 0.1 19.1 49.2 -30.13 QP 0.588 47.6 0.6 0.1 48.3 56.0 -7.73 A 0.588 15.7 0.6 0.1 16.4 46.0 -29.64 QP 0.170 37.6 0.6 0.3 38.5 65.0 -26.54 A 0.170 17.7 0.6 0.3 18.6 55.0 -36.44 QP 0.338 35.0 0.6 0.1 35.7 59.3 -23.64 A 0.338 3.7 0.6 0.1 4.4 49.3 -44.94 QP 0.470 32.9 0.6 0.1 33.6 56.5 -22.94 A 0.470 17.1 0.6 0.1 17.8 46.5 -28.7

Note: Peak measurements are compared to the average limit.

Hayward Pool

Calculations G=D+E+F I=G-H

Data:

Page 33 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 34: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of disturbance power (EN 55014-1 (DP))9.0

Method:Measurements in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 300 MHz shall be performed wit h receivers with quasi-peak detectors shall be in accordance with clause 2 of CISPR 16-1; receivers with average detectors shall be in accordance with clause 4 of CISPR 16-1.

The absorbing clamp shall be in accordance with clause 13 of CISPR 16-1.

The methods of Section 6 of EN 55014 are to be used with the EUT operation in accordance with Section 7 of EN 55014. In general, the following conditions apply.

The appliance to be tested is placed on a non-metallic table at least 0.4 m from other metallic objects and the lead to be measured on is stretched in a straight line for a distance sufficient to accommodate the absorbing clamp, and to permit the necessary measuring adjustment of position fortuning. The clamp is placed around the lead so as to measure a quantity proportional to the disturbance power on the lead.

The absorbing clamp is positioned for maximum indication at each test frequency: the clamp shall be moved along the lead until the maximum value is found between a position adjacent to the appliance and a distance of about a half-wavelength from it.

The straight portion of the lead to be measured on should therefore be about 6 m long. If the original lead of the appliance is shorter than the necessary length it shall be extended or replaced by a similar lead.

Any plug or socket which will not pass through the absorbing clamp due to its size shall be removed or, especially in the case of controversy with regard to the banning of sales or withdrawal of a type approval the lead may be replaced by a lead of similar quality with the necessary length.

TEST SITEThe test site for radiated emissions is located at 1950 Evergreen Blvd, Suite 100, Duluth, Georgia 30096.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.150 kHz to 30 MHz: +/- 2.8 dB

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Absorbing Clamp Fischer Custom Comm F-201 213185 05/14/2009 05/14/2010

Cable E11, <18GHz Huber-Suhner Sucoflex 104PEA E11 211266 06/19/2009 06/19/2010

EMI Receiver Hewlett Packard 8546A 211505 02/02/2010 02/02/2011

EMI Receiver, Preselector section Hewlett Packard 85460A 015762 02/02/2010 02/02/2011

Excel spreadsheet for absorbing clamp tests Software Excel - Absorb Cla SW001 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Tile - software profile for emissions testing using the absorbing clamp.

Software Tile - Absorb Clam SW014 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 34 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 35: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of disturbance power (EN 55014-1 (DP))9.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 35 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 36: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of disturbance power (EN 55014-1 (DP))9.0

EN 55013 Disturbance Power

30. 0M 57.0M 84.0M 111. 0M 138.0M 165.0M 192. 0M 219. 0M 246.0M 273.0M 300.0MFrequency (MHz)

0

10. 0

20. 0

30. 0

40. 0

50. 0

60. 0

Am

plit

ude

(dB

uV

/m)

Company: Hayward Pool

Oracle Number: G100034923

09:52:3 6 AM, Tuesday, April 27, 20 10

Operato r: RCB

Mode: HeatingLead: AC Mains

EUT - Pool HeaterM/N - SHE3003S/N - No tes -

QP Lim itAverage LimitDisturbance Power Data

Power Disturbance from 30-300MHz

Plot:

Page 36 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 37: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Measurement of disturbance power (EN 55014-1 (DP))9.0

Client: Receiver: HP 8546AModel Number: SHE3003 Cables: E11 (6-19-2009)

Project Number: G100034923 Absorbing Clamp: AID-213185 SN-161-ABS(5-Tested By: RCB Preamplifier: No PreAmp

Date: 04/27/2010Frequency Range (MHz): 30-300 Limit: Household

Input power: 230Vac/50Hz Modifications for compliance (y/n): nNotes:

A B C D E F G H IClamp Cable Preamp

Detector Frequency Reading Factor Loss Gain Net Limit Margin(P,QP, A) MHz dBuV dB dB dB dBpW dBpW dB

P 77.045 22.5 -0.3 0.6 0.0 22.8 36.7 -13.9P 79.955 24.2 -0.3 0.6 0.0 24.5 36.8 -12.3P 95.962 25.0 -1.3 0.6 0.0 24.3 37.4 -13.1P 101.052 29.7 -1.8 0.6 0.0 28.5 37.6 -9.1P 104.203 30.2 -1.8 0.6 0.0 29.0 37.7 -8.7P 106.145 27.4 -1.7 0.6 0.0 26.3 37.8 -11.5

Note: Peak measurements are compared to the average limit.

Hayward Pool

Calculations G=C+D+E-F I=G-H

Data:

Page 37 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 38: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Method:The test set-up consists of the test generator, EUT and auxiliary instrumentation necessary to perform direct and indirect application of discharges to the EUT in the following manner:a) contact discharge to the conductive surfaces and to coupling planes;b) air discharge at insulating surfaces.

The EUT shall be arranged in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for installation (if any).

In the case of air discharge testing, the climatic conditions shall be within the following ranges:- ambient temperature: 15° C to 35° C;- relative humidity: 30 % to 60 %;- atmospheric pressure: 86 kPa (860 mbar) to 106 kPa (1 060 mbar).NOTE Any other values are specified in the product specification. The EUT shall be operated within its intended climatic conditions.

GENERAL SETUPA ground reference plane shall be provided on the floor of the laboratory. It shall be a metallic sheet (copper or aluminium) of 0.25 mm minimum thickness; other metallic materials may be used but they shall have at least 0.65 mm minimum thickness.

The minimum size of the reference plane is 1 m^2, the exact size depending on the dimensions of the EUT. It shall project beyond the EUT or coupling plane by at least 0.5 m on all sides, and shall be connected to the protective grounding system.

Local safety regulations shall always be met.

The EUT shall be arranged and connected according to its functional requirements.

A distance of 1 m minimum shall be provided between the equipment under test and the walls of the laboratory and any other metallic structure.

The EUT shall be connected to the grounding system, in accordance with its installation specifications. No additional grounding connections are allowed.

The positioning of the power and signal cables shall be representative of installation practice.

The discharge return cable of the ESD generator shall be connected to the ground reference plane. The total length of this cable is in general 2 m.In cases where this length exceeds the length necessary to apply the discharges to be selected points, the excess length shall, where possible, be placed non-inductively off the ground reference plane and shall not come closer than 0.2 m to other conductive parts in the test set-up.

The connection of the earth cables to the ground reference plane and all bondings shall be of low impedance, for example by using clamping devices for high frequency applications.

Where coupling planes are specified, for example to allow indirect application of the discharge, they shall be constructed from the same material type and thickness as that of the ground reference plane, and shall be connected to the GRP via a cable with a 470 kOhm resistor located at each end. These resistors shall be capable of withstanding the discharge voltage and shall be insulated to avoid short circuits to the GRP when the cable lies on the GRP.

TABLETOP EQUIPMENTThe test set-up shall consist of a wooden table, 0.8 m high, standing on the ground reference plane.

A horizontal coupling plane (HCP), 1.6 m x 0.8 m, shall be placed on the table. The EUT and cables shall be isolated from the coupling plane by an insulating support 0.5 mm thick.

If the EUT is too large to be located 0.1 m minimum from all sides of the HCP, an additional, identical HCP shall be used, placed 0.3 m from the first, with the short sides adjacent. The table has to be enlarged or two tables may be used. The HCPs shall not be bonded together, other than via resistive cables to the GRP.

Any mounting feet associated with the EUT shall remain in place.

FLOOR STANDING EQUIPMENTThe EUT and cables shall be isolated from the ground reference plane by an insulating support about 0.1 m thick.

Any mounting feet associated with the EUT shall remain in place.

TEST METHOD FOR UNGROUNDED EQUIPMENTThe test method described in this subclause is applicable to equipment or part(s) of equipment whose installation specifications or design preclude connection to any grounding system. Equipment, or parts thereof, includes portable, battery-operated and double-insulated equipment (class II equipment). Rationale: Ungrounded equipment, or ungrounded part(s) of equipment, cannot discharge itself similarly to class I mains-supplied equipment. If the charge is not removed before the next ESD pulse is applied, it is possible that the EUT or part(s) of the EUT be stressed up to twice the intended test voltage. Therefore, double-insulated equipment could be charged at an unrealistically high charge, by accumulating severalESD discharges on the capacitance of the class II insulation, and then discharge at the breakdown voltage of the insulation with a much higher energy.

To simulate a single ESD event (either by air or by contact discharge), the charge on the EUT shall be removed prior to each applied ESD pulse.

The charge on the metallic point or part to which the ESD pulse is to be applied, for example, connector shells, battery charge pins, metallic antennae,

Page 38 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 39: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Method:shall be removed prior to each applied ESD test pulse.

When one or several metallic accessible parts are subject to the ESD test, the charge shall be removed from the point where the ESD pulse is to be applied, as no guarantee can be given about the resistance between this and other accessible points on the product.

A cable with 470 k-Ohm bleeder resistors, similar to the one used with the horizontal and vertical coupling planes, shall be used.

As the capacitance between EUT and HCP (tabletop) and between EUT and GRP (floor-standing) is determined by the size of the EUT, the cable with bleeder resistors may remain installed during the ESD test when functionally allowed. In the discharge cable, one resistor shall be connected as close as possible, preferably less than 20 mm from the EUT test point. The second resistor shall be connected near the end of the cable attached to the HCP for tabletop equipment (see Figure 8), or GRP for floor-standing equipment.

The presence of the cable with the bleeder resistors can influence the test results of some equipment. In case of dispute, a test with the cable disconnected during the ESD pulse takes precedence over the test with the cable installed during the test, provided that the charge has sufficiently decayed between the successive discharges.

As an alternative, the following options can be used:- the time interval between successive discharges shall be extended to the time necessary to allow natural decay of the charge from the EUT;- a carbon fibre brush with bleeder resistors (for example, 2 x 470 k-Ohm) in the grounding cable;- an air-ionizer to speed-up the "natural" discharging process of the EUT to its environment. The ionizer shall be turned off when applying an air-discharge test. The use of any alternative method shall be reported in the test report. NOTE In case of dispute concerning the charge decay, the charge on the EUT can be monitored by a non-contacting electric field meter. When the charge has decayed below 10 % of the initial value, the EUT is considered to be discharged.

The tip of the ESD generator shall be held normal (perpendicular) to the surface of the EUT.

Tabletop equipment: For tabletop equipment, the EUT is placed on the horizontal coupling plane on top of the insulating foil (0,5 mm thick). When a metallic accessible part, to which the ESD pulse is to be applied, is available on the EUT, this part shall be connected to the HCP via the cable with bleeder resistors.

Floor-standing equipment: Floor-standing equipment without any metallic connection to the ground reference plane shall be installed similarly to 7.1.2 and Figure 6 of EN 61000-4-2. A cable with bleeder resistors shall be used between the metallic accessible part, to which the ESD pulse is to be applied, and the ground reference plane (GRP).

EXECUTION OF TESTSThe testing shall be performed by direct and indirect application of discharges to the EUT as appropriate.

Direct application of discharges to the EUT:The static electricity discharges shall be applied only to those points and surfaces of the EUT which are accessible to persons during normal use. The following exclusions apply (i.e. discharges are not applied to those items):a) those points and surfaces which are only accessible under maintenance. In this case, special ESD mitigation procedures shall be given in the accompanying documentation;b) those points and surfaces which are only accessible under service by the (end-)user. Examples of these rarely accessed points are as follows: battery contacts while changing batteries, a cassette in a telephone answering machine, etc.;c) those points and surfaces of equipment which are no longer accessible after fixed installation or after following the instructions for use, for example, the bottom and/or wall-side of equipment or areas behind fitted connectors;d) the contacts of coaxial and multi-pin connectors which are provided with a metallic connector shell. In this case, contact discharges shall only be applied to the metallic shell of that connector. Contacts within a non-conductive (for example, plastic) connector and which are accessible shall be tested by the air-discharge test only. This test shall be carried out by using the rounded tip finger on the ESD generator.e) those contacts of connectors or other accessible parts that are ESD sensitive because of functional reasons and are provided with an ESD warning label, for example, r.f. inputs from measurement, receiving or other communication functions. Rationale: Many connector ports are designed to handle high-frequency information, either analogue or digital, and therefore cannot be provided with sufficient overvoltage protection devices. In the case ofanalogue signals, bandpass filters may be a solution. Overvoltage protecting diodes have too much stray capacitance to be useful at the frequencies at which the EUT is designed to operate.

The test voltage shall be increased from the minimum to the selected test level, in order to determine any threshold of failure. The final test level should not exceed the product specification value in order to avoid damage to the equipment.

The test shall be performed with single discharges. On preselected points at least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) shall be applied.

For the time interval between successive single discharges an initial value of 1 s is recommended. Longer intervals may be necessary to determine whether a system failure has occurred. NOTE The points to which the discharges should be applied may be selected by means of an exploration carried out at a repetition rate of 20 discharges per second, or more.

The ESD generator shall be held perpendicular to the surface to which the discharge is applied.

The discharge return cable of the generator shall be kept at a distance of at least 0.2 m from the EUT whilst the discharge is being applied.

In the case of contact discharges, the tip of the discharge electrode shall touch the EUT, before the discharge switch is operated.

In the case of painted surfaces covering a conducting substrate, the following procedure shall be adopted:

Page 39 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 40: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Method:If the coating is not declared to be an insulating coating by the equipment manufacturer, then the pointed tip of the generator shall penetrate the coating so as to make contact with the conducting substrate. Coating declared as insulating by the manufacturer shall only be submitted to the air discharge. The contact discharge test shall not be applied to such surfaces.

In the case of air discharges, the round discharge tip of the discharge electrode shall be approached as fast as possible (without causing mechanical damage) to touch the EUT. After each discharge, the ESD generator (discharge electrode) shall be removed from the EUT. The generator is then retriggered for a new single discharge. This procedure shall be repeated until the discharges are completed. In the case of an air discharge test, the discharge switch, which is used for contact discharge, shall be closed.

Indirect application of the discharge:Discharges to objects placed or installed near the EUT shall be simulated by applying the discharges of the ESD generator to a coupling plane, in the contact discharge mode.

Horizontal coupling plane (HCP) under the EUT:Discharge to the HCP shall be made horizontally to the edge of the HCP. At least 10 single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) shall be applied at the front edge of each HCP opposite the centre point of each unit (if applicable) of the EUT and 0.1 m from the front of the EUT. The long axis of the discharge electrode shall be in the plane of the HCP and perpendicular to its front edge during the discharge. The discharge electrode shall be in contact with the edge of the HCP. In addition, consideration should be given to exposing all sides of the EUT to this test.

Vertical coupling plane:At least 10 single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) shall be applied to the centre of one vertical edge of the coupling plane. The coupling plane, of dimensions 0.5 m x 0.5 m, is placed parallel to, and positioned at a distance of 0.1 m from, the EUT. Discharges shall be applied to the coupling plane, with sufficient different positions such that the four faces of the EUT are completely illuminated.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.Voltage: +\- 10%Rise Time: +\- 30%

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Digital Pocket Thermometer and Hydrometer Mannix SAM700BAR 211897 11/16/2009 11/16/2010

Electrostatic Discharge Gun (ESD) NoiseKen TC-815P 211511 06/08/2009 06/08/2010

Electrostatic Discharge Simulator (ESD) Noiseken ESS-200AX 014450 07/06/2009 07/06/2010

Multimeter Fluke 87 213046 10/07/2009 10/07/2010

Vertical Coupling Plane Intertek ESD-VCP 213119 VBU VBU

Vertical Coupling Plane Intertek ESD-VCP 212100 VBU VBU

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 40 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 41: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 6

Photo:

Page 41 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 42: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 42 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 43: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 5

Photo:

Page 43 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 44: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 4

Photo:

Page 44 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 45: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 3

Photo:

Page 45 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 46: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 1

Photo:

Page 46 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 47: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

Test Targets - Slide 2

Photo:

Page 47 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 48: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-2: 2001 Edition 1.4) (EN 61000-4-2:95 +A1:98+A2:01)

10.0

DischargeTest Voltage >Point Type Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos Neg Pos NegHCP Contact A(1) A(1) A(1) A(1)Edge Contact A(2) A(2) A(2) A(2)VCP Contact A(3) A(3) A(3) A(3)1 - 8 Air A A A A A A9 - 15 Contact A A A A

16 - 18 Contact A A A A19 - 27 Contact A A A A

Standard: Test Levels:

Input Voltage: 230 Vac / 50Hz975 kOhms (VCP) Ambient Temperature: 20.5 °C

Yes Relative Humidity: 48 %Atmospheric Pressure: 982.5 mbars

Test Voltages, Polarities and Result Classification2 kV 4 kV 6 kV 8 kV 15 kV ___kV

Notes:(1) Discharges to the Horizontal Coupling Plane, 4 locations, is not applicable for floor standing equipment.

Air

Onl

y >

8 kV

8kV air / 4 kV contactEN 55014-2

Resistor Value:Waveform Verifed:

(2) Discharges to the front edge of Horizontal Coupling Plane, is not applicable for floor standing equipment.(3) Discharged to Vertical Coupling Plane, 4 locations.

Data:

Page 48 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 49: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-4: 2004) (EN 61000-4-4: 2004)11.0

Method:TEST SIGNAL VERIFICATIONAn oscilloscope should be used to verify the application of the EFT.

GENERALThe following is taken from IEC 1000-4-4. The operator is required to configure the EUT to test and execute the test program which included specifying the test parameters.

Testing should take place within an ambient temperature of 15 to 35°C, relative humidity of 25 to 75% and an atmospheric pressure of 860 to 1060 mbar.

TEST SETUPThe reference ground plane should project beyond the EUT by at least 0.1m on all sides and shall be connected to the protective grounding system. The EUT shall be arranged and connected to satisfy its functional requirements, according to the equipment installation specifications. The EUT shall be connected to the earthing system in accordance with the manufacturer’s installation specifications; no additional earthing connections are allowed. The minimum distance between the EUT and all other conductive structures (e.g. the walls of a shielded room), except the ground plane beneath the EUT, shall be more than 0.5 m. The connection of the test equipment ground cables to the ground reference plane and all bondings shall provide minimum inductance.

COUPLING DEVICESCoupling devices shall be used for the application of the test voltages. They shall be coupled to the lines between the EUT and the decoupling network or between the two units of equipment involved in the test.

The length of the signal and power lines between the coupling device and the EUT shall be 1m or less. If the manufacturer provides a non-detachable supply cable more than 1 m long with the equipment, the excess length of this cable shall be gathered into a flat coil with a 0.4 m diameter and situated at a distance of 0.1 m above the ground reference plane. The distance of 1 m or less between EUT and the coupling device shall be maintained.

= = > Coupling/decoupling Network for A.C./D.C. Mains Supply PortThis network is an integral part of the EFT signal generator.

= = > Capacitive Coupling ClampThe device is composed of a clamp unit (made of galvanized steel, brass, copper or aluminum) for housing the cables (flat or round) of the circuits under test and shall be placed on the ground plane of minimum area of 1m x 1m. It is designed to be used on lines connected to I/O and communication ports, but also on AC/DC power supply ports if the coupling/decoupling network specified above for power supply ports cannot be used.

When using the clamp, a proper connection must be made between it and the ground plane. Ensure that the ground plane and underside of the clamp are clean and free of anything which would prohibit complete surface to surface contact. Tape the clamp to the ground plane with copper tape.

The reference ground plane shall extend beyond the clamp by at least 0.1 m on all sides. The minimum distance between the coupling plates and other conductive structures, except the ground plane beneath the coupling clamp and beneath the EUT, shall be 0.5 m.

The generator shall be connected to that end of the clamp that is nearest to the EUT.

The clamp itself shall be closed as much as possible to provide maximum coupling capacitance between the cable and the clamp.

EQUIPMENT UNDER TEST SETUPIn the case of table-top equipment, the EUT should be located 0.8 m above the ground plane.

For floor standing equipment, the EUTs shall be placed on a ground reference plane and shall be insulated from it by an insulating support 0.1 m thick.

Unless specifically designed as floor standing, the EUT should be tested as table top.

If the EUT is specified as either stand alone or rack mountable, the test shall be performed in both configurations.

When an equipment rack is used, the rack shall be bonded to the ground plane with at least a 1 inch ground strap.

The EUT is to be cabled in a manner typical of normal operation. The configuration shall remain the same whether the power lines or data lines are tested.

Test programs and software shall be chosen so as to exercise all normal modes of operation of the EUT. The use of special exercising software is encouraged, but permitted only where it can be shown that the EUT is being comprehensively exercised. The EUT shall be continually operated in its most sensitive mode (program cycle) which shall be determined by preliminary testing.

If monitoring equipment is required, it should be decoupled in order to reduce the possibility of erroneous failure indication.

Before, during and after each event, the EC EMC Imm Verification: 6/01 Method should be used to verify and classify any resulting observations. All results should be recorded below. Photos should be taken of showing the grounding strap if used.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.Voltage: +\- 10%Rise Time: +\- 30%

Page 49 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 50: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-4: 2004) (EN 61000-4-4: 2004)11.0

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Application to control EMC Pro for -4-4, -4-5, -4-8, -4-11

Software CEWare (2.10) SW019 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

CDN, 3 Phase Coupler/Decoupler - Surge + Burst

KeyTek CM-3CD 213199 11/02/2009 11/02/2010

Digital Pocket Thermometer and Hydrometer Mannix SAM700BAR 211897 11/16/2009 11/16/2010

EMC Immunity Test System KeyTek EMC Pro 213192 11/02/2009 11/02/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 50 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 51: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-4: 2004) (EN 61000-4-4: 2004)11.0

Test CouplingPoint Method pos neg pos neg pos neg pos neg pos neg

Power L1 Direct A A A APower L2 Direct A A A APower L3 Direct A A A A

Power Neutral Direct A A A APower PE Direct A A A A

Standard: EN 55014-2 Cat II Input Voltage: 400VAC,50Hz,3�Test Levels: Ambient Temperature: 21ºC

Relative Humidity: 51.3%Ground Strap used: Yes Atmospheric Pressure: 980.4 mBars

EFT observed on oscilloscope: Yes

Test Voltages, Polarities, and Result Classification0.25kV 0.5kV 1 kV 2 kV 4 kV

AC:1kV, Signal/DC:0.5kV

Data:

Page 51 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 52: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Surge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-5: 2001) (EN 61000-4-5:95 +A1:01)12.0

Method:SIMULATOR VERIFICATIONPrior to conducting the surge test, verification should be performed to ensure proper operation of the simulator.

GENERALThis test is performed in accordance with EN 61000-4-5.

CLIMATIC CONDITIONSTesting should take place within an ambient temperature of 15 to 35°C, relative humidity of 10 to 75% and an atmospheric pressure of 860 to 1060 mbar.

TEST SETUPThe surge is to be applied to the EUT power supply terminals via the capacitive coupling network. Decoupling networks are required in order to avoid possible adverse effects on equipment not under test that may be powered by the same lines and to provide sufficient decoupling impedance to the surge wave so that the specified wave may be developed on the lines under test. The coupling/decoupling network is built into the test generator.

If not otherwise specified the power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling network shall be 2 m in length (or shorter).

To simulate the representative coupling impedance, in some cases, additional specified resistors have to be used for the tests.

If the actual operating signal sources are not available, they may be simulated.

TEST DETAILSThe following items are met when the test sequence for full compliance is run on the EMC-Pro. This test sequence is included in the control software.

If not otherwise specified the surges have to be applied synchronized to the voltage phase at the zero-crossing and the peak value of the O.C. voltage wave (positive and negative).

The surges have to be applied line to line and line(s) and earth. When testing line to earth the test voltage has to be applied successively between each of the lines and earth, if there is no other specification.

The test procedure shall also consider the non-linear current-voltage characteristics of the equipment under test. Therefore the test voltage has to be increased by steps up to the test level specified in the results section. All lower levels including the selected test level shall be satisfied. To find all critical points of the duty cycle of the equipment, a sufficient number of positive and negative test pulses shall be applied.

Before, during and after each event, verify and classify any resulting observations. All results should be recorded below.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.Voltage: +\- 10%Rise Time: +\- 30%

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Application to control EMC Pro for -4-4, -4-5, -4-8, -4-11

Software CEWare (2.10) SW019 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

CDN, 3 Phase Coupler/Decoupler - Surge + Burst

KeyTek CM-3CD 213199 11/02/2009 11/02/2010

Digital Pocket Thermometer and Hydrometer Mannix SAM700BAR 211897 11/16/2009 11/16/2010

EMC Immunity Test System KeyTek EMC Pro 213192 11/02/2009 11/02/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 52 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 53: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Surge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-5: 2001) (EN 61000-4-5:95 +A1:01)12.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 53 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 54: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Surge Immunity Test (IEC 61000-4-5: 2001) (EN 61000-4-5:95 +A1:01)12.0

pos neg pos neg pos neg pos negA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA A

A AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA AA A

Standard:Ambient Temperature: 20.6°C

Relative Humidity: 51.6% Test MatrixAtmospheric Pressure: 979.1 mbars AC:

Input Voltage: 400VAC, 50Hz, 3� DC:Observed surge on Oscilloscope? Yes Indoor Signal:

Outdoor Signal:

EN 55014-2 Cat II

na

L-to-PE2kVnana

L-to-L1kVnana

L1-PE, at 0 degL1-PE, at 90 degL1-PE, at 180 degL1-PE, at 270 deg

Test

Test Voltages, Polarities, and Result Classification0.5kV 1kV 2kV 4kV

N-PE, at 0 degN-PE, at 90 degN-PE, at 180 deg

L1-L2, at 270 deg

N-PE, at 270 degL1-L2, at 0 degL1-L2, at 90 degL1-L2, at 180 deg

L3-N, at 0 degL3-N, at 90 degL3-N, at 180 degL3-N, at 270 deg

na

L2-PE, at 0 degL2-PE, at 90 degL2-PE, at 180 degL2-PE, at 270 degL3-PE, at 0 degL3-PE, at 90 degL3-PE, at 180 degL3-PE, at 270 deg

L1-L3, at 0 degL1-L3, at 90 degL1-L3, at 180 degL1-L3, at 270 degL2-L3, at 0 degL2-L3, at 90 degL2-L3, at 180 degL2-L3, at 270 degL1-N, at 0 degL1-N, at 90 degL1-N, at 180 degL1-N, at 270 degL2-N, at 0 degL2-N, at 90 degL2-N, at 180 degL2-N, at 270 deg

Data:

Page 54 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 55: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

13.0

Method:TEST SIGNAL VERIFICATIONDuring the testing described below, a current clamp connected to the spectrum analyzer should be placed on the cable to which the test signal is coupled. The spectrum analyzer should then be monitored to verify that the signal is indeed being coupled onto the cable.

COUPLING AND DECOUPLING NETWORKS (CDNs)The disturbing signal shall be coupled to the supply lines, using type CDN-M1 (single wire), CDN-M2 (two wires) or CDN-M3 (three wires) networks. If in real installations the supply wires are individually routed, separate coupling and decoupling networks CDN-M1 shall be used and all input ports shall be treated separately.

If the EUT is provided with other earth terminals (e.g. for RF purposes or high leakage currents), they shall be connected to the ground reference plane:- through the CDN-M1 when the characteristics or specification of the EUT permit. In this case, the (power) supply shall be provided through the CDN-M3 network;- when the characteristics or specification of the EUT do not permit to have a CDN-M1 network in series with the earth terminal for RF or other reasons, the earth terminal shall be directly connected to the ground reference plane. In this case the CDN-M3 network shall be replaced by a CDN-M2 network to prevent an RF short circuit by the protective earth conductor. When the equipment was already supplied via CDN-M1 or CDN-M2 networks, these shall remain in operation.

For coupling and decoupling disturbing signals to an unscreened cable with balanced lines, a CDN-T2, CDN-T4 or CDN-T8 shall be used as coupling and decoupling network.- CDN-T2 for a cable with 1 symmetrical pair (2 wires).- CDN-T4 for a cable with 2 symmetrical pairs (4 wires).- CDN-T8 for a cable with 4 symmetrical pairs (8 wires).

CLAMP INJECTIONFor balanced or non-balanced multi-pair cables, clamp injection is more appropriate.

With clamp injection devices, the coupling and decoupling functions are separated. Coupling is provided by the clamp-on device while the common-mode impedance and the decoupling functions established at the auxiliary equipment. As such, the auxiliary equipment becomes part of the coupling and decoupling devices.

SETTING (CALIBRATION) OF THE TEST GENERATORDuring the setting of the test generator, all connections to the EUT and AE Port of the coupling and decoupling devices, other than those required, shall be disconnected either to avoid short-circuit conditions or to avoid destruction of the measurement equipment.

After the correct settings have been made, the modulation shall be switched on and checked using an RF oscilloscope.

During the tests the modulation shall remain switched on.

SETTING OF THE OUTPUT LEVEL AT THE EUT PORT OF THE COUPLING DEVICEThe test generator shall be connected to the RF input port of the coupling device. The EUT port of the coupling device shall be connected in common-mode through the 150 ohm to 50 ohm adapter to a measuring equipment having a 50 ohm input impedance. The AE port shall be loaded in common-mode with a 150 ohm to 50 ohm adapter, terminated with 50 ohms.

The setting has to be performed for each individual coupling and decoupling device.

TEST SET-UPThe equipment, both table-top and floor-standing, to be tested is placed on an insulating support of 0.1 m height above a ground reference plane. All relevant cables shall be provided with the appropriate coupling and decoupling devices at a distance between 0.1 m and 0.3 m from the projected geometry of the EUT on the ground reference plane.

All cables, selected for testing, shall be terminated functionally as close as possible to the real installation conditions.When several cables coming from the EUT are in close proximity over a length of more than 10 m or going from the EUT to another equipment in a cable tray or conduit they shall be treated as one cable.

In general, it is sufficient that only a limited number, n (With 2 <= n <= 5) of current distributions through the EUT are excited. Testing shall be carried out using the most sensitive cable configuration. All other cables connected to the EUT shall either be disconnected (when functionally allowed) or provided with decoupling networks only.

= = > EUT comprising a single unitThe EUT shall be placed on an insulating support, 0.1 m above the ground reference plane. For table-top equipment the ground reference plane may be placed on a table.

On all cables to be tested, coupling and decoupling devices shall be inserted. The coupling and decoupling devices shall be placed on the ground reference plane, making direct contact with it at about 0.1 m to 0.3 m from the EUT. The cables between the coupling and decoupling devices and the EUT shall be as short as possible and shall not be bundled nor wrapped. Their height above the ground reference plane shall be between 30 mm and 50 mm.

If the EUT is provided with other earth terminals, they shall, when allowed, be connected to the ground reference plane through the coupling and decoupling network CDN-M1.

If the EUT is provided with a keyboard or hand-held accessory, then the artificial hand shall be placed on this keyboard or wrapped around the

Page 55 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 56: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

13.0

Method:accessory and connected to the ground reference plane.

Auxiliary equipment (AE) required for the defined operation of the EUT, as well as auxiliary equipment necessary for ensuring any data transfer and assessment of the functions, shall be connected to the EUT through coupling and decoupling devices. However, as far as possible the number of cables to be tested should be limited by restricting attention to the representative functions.

= = > EUT comprising several unitsEquipment comprising several units which are interconnected together, shall be tested using one of the following methods.

Preferred method: Each sub-unit shall be treated and tested separately as an EUT considering all others as AE. Coupling and decoupling devices shall be placed on the cables of the sub-units considered as the EUT. All sub-units shall be tested in turn.

Alternative method: Sub-units that are always connected together by short cables, i.e. <= 1 m, and that are part of the equipment to be tested can be considered as one EUT. No conducted immunity test shall be performed on their interconnecting cables, these cables being regarded as internal cables of the system.

The units being part of such an EUT shall be placed as close as possible to each other without making contact, all on the insulating support 0.1 m above the ground reference plane. The interconnecting cables of these units, shall also be placed on the insulating support. Coupling and decoupling devices shall be placed on all other cables of the EUT, e.g. on cables to the mains supply and auxiliary equipment.

= = > Injection Using the Current ClampEach AE used with clamp injection shall represent the functional installation conditions as closely as possible. To approximate the required common-mode impedance the following measures need to be taken.

- Each AE, used with clamp injection, shall be placed on an insulating support 0.1 m above the ground reference plane.

- All cables connected to each AE, other than those being connected to the EUT, shall be provided with decoupling networks. These decoupling networks shall be applied no further than 0.3 m from the AE. The cable(s) between the AE and the decoupling network(s) or in between the AE and the injection clamp shall not be bundled nor wrapped and shall be kept between 30 mm and 50 mm above the ground reference plane.

- The cable length between the AE and the clamp injection device shall be as short as possible (<=0.3 m) to improve reproducibility at higher frequencies (>=30 MHz).

- At each AE the decoupling network installed on the cable, closest to the one(s) being connected to the EUT, shall be replaced by a CDN which is terminated at its input port with 50 ohms. This CDN represents the 150 ohm loading of the AE to the ground reference plane. In the case where the AE is provided with a (separate) earth terminal, this earth terminal shall be connected through a CDN-M1 network, terminated with 50 Ohm at the input port, to the ground reference plane while keeping decoupling networks on all other cables.

When using clamp injection and the common-mode impedance requirements cannot be met at the AE side, it is necessary that the common-mode impedance of the AE is less than or equal to the common-mode impedance of the EUT port being tested. If not, measures shall be taken, e.g. by using decoupling capacitors at the AE port, to satisfy this condition.

- Each AE and EUT used with clamp injection shall represent the functional installation conditions as close as possible e.g. either the EUT shall be connected to the ground reference plane or placed on an insulating support.

- By means of an extra current probe (having low insertion loss), inserted in between the injection clamp and the EUT, the current resulting from the induced voltage shall be monitored. If the current exceeds the nominal circuit value Imax given below, the test generator level shall be reduced until the measured current is equal to the Imax value:Imax = Uo/150 ohm

TEST PROCEDUREWhen using a CDN, a proper connection must be made between the ground plane and the CDN. Ensure that the ground plane and underside of the CDN are clean and free of anything which would prohibit complete surface to surface contact. Tape the CDN to the ground plane with copper tape.

The test shall be performed with the test generator connected to each of the coupling and decoupling devices in turn while the other non-excited RF input ports of the coupling devices are terminated by a 50 ohm load resistor.

The frequency range is swept from 150 kHz to 80 MHz, using the signal levels established during the setting process, and with the disturbance signal 80% amplitude modulated with a 1 kHz sine wave, pausing to adjust the RF signal or to switch coupling devices as necessary. The rate of sweep shall not exceed 1.5 x 10^-3 decades/s. Where the frequency is swept incrementally, the step size shall not exceed 1% of the start and thereafter 1% of the preceding frequency value.

The dwell time at each frequency shall not be less than the time necessary for the EUT to be exercised and able to respond. Sensitive frequencies e.g. clock frequency(ies) and harmonics or frequencies of dominant interest shall be analyzed separately.

Before, during and after each event, the EC EMC Imm Verification: 6/01 Method should be used to verify and classify any resulting observations. All results should be recorded below. Photos should be taken of showing the setup of every coupling device used.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYCompliance of the product is based on the measured value. However, the measurement uncertainty is included for informational purposes. The

Page 56 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 57: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

13.0

Method:values given are the measurement uncertainty values with an expanded uncertainty of k=2.150 kHz to 230 MHz: +/- 1.9 dB

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

Amplifier, Wideband RF Power Kalmus 747LC-CE 213031 VBU VBU

Attenuator, 06 dB, <18GHz Weinschel Corp 59-6-34 211565 VBU VBU

Attenuator, 06 dB, <18GHz Weinschel Corp 2 200002 09/09/2009 09/09/2010

Cable E17, <18GHz Belden RG214/U E17 06/08/2009 06/08/2010

Digital Pocket Thermometer and Hydrometer Mannix SAM700BAR 211897 11/16/2009 11/16/2010

Directional Coupler Werlatone C5964 200016 VBU VBU

EM Clamp Fischer Custom Comm FCC-203I 213070 01/18/2010 01/18/2011

EM Clamp Calibration Fixture Fischer Custom Comm F203I-CF 213117 VBU VBU

Power Meter Boonton 4232A-01 211504 01/19/2010 01/19/2011

Power Sensor, Dual Diode, 100kHz to 18GHz, 20 dBm

Boonton 51013(4E) 211503 01/19/2010 01/19/2011

Power Sensor, Dual Diode, 10kHz to 8GHz, 20 dBm

Boonton 51011-EMC 200065 01/18/2010 01/18/2011

Signal Generator, 10kHz-990MHz Hewlett Packard 8656B LEX-1016 05/12/2009 05/12/2010

Tile - software profile for conducted immunity testing

Software Tile - Cond Imm SW012 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 57 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 58: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

13.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 58 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 59: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Immunity to conducted disturbances, induced by radio-frequency fields (IEC 61000-4-6:2003 + A1:2004 + A2:2006) (EN 61000-4-6: 2007)

13.0

Result ClassificationA

Temp: 21.3°C Input V:Humidity: 52.2% Standard:

Test PortAC: 150kHz-230MHz, 3 Vrms, 1kHz, (80%AM)DC: n/a

Signal/Control: 150kHz-230MHz, 1 Vrms, 1kHz, (80%AM)Func. Earth or Notes: n/a

Injection Device Clamp

Test Level

400VAC, 50Hz, 3PhaseEN 55014-2 Cat II

Atmospheric Pressure: 980.8 mBars

Port DescriptionAC Power Line Input

Test Level (Vrms)3

Data:

Page 59 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 60: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions and Voltage Variations Immunity Tests (IEC 61000-4-11: 2004) (EN 61000-4-11: 2004)

14.0

Method:The voltage test basis (Ut) is equal to the "rated voltage" for the equipment under test (EUT). If the EUT has a "rated voltage range" the following applies:- if the maximum voltage does not exceed 20% of the lowest voltage specified in the "rated voltage range", a single voltage from that range may be specified as the voltage test basis (Ut);- in all other cases, the test must be repeated with the lower and upper voltages in the voltage range as the voltage test basis (Ut).

Testing should take place within an ambient temperature of 15 to 35°C, relative humidity of 25 to 75% and an atmospheric pressure of 860 to 1060 mbar. The test should be performed with the EUT connected to the test generator with the shortest power supply cable as specified by the EUT manufacturer. If no cable length is specified, it shall be the shortest possible length suitable. If actual operating signal sources are not available to the EUT, they may be simulated.

The EUT should be tested for each selected combination of voltage test level and duration with a sequence of three dips/interruptions at intervals of 10 s minimum (between each to event). Each representative mode of operation should be tested.

The test is to be performed at the zero crossings of the voltage on each phase. The following voltage test levels (in % Ut) are to be used: <5%, 40% and 70%, corresponding to dips and interruptions of >95%, 60% and 30%.

Before, during and after each event, the EC EMC Imm Verification: 6/01 Method should be used to verify and classify any resulting observations. All results should be recorded below.

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTYVoltage: +/- 5%Voltage Change at 100%: +/- 5%Voltage Change at 70%: +/- 7%Voltage Change at 40%: +/- 10%

Description: Manufacturer: Model: Asset Number: Cal Date: Cal Due:

Test Equipment Used:

AC Power Source/CTS System-Power Analyzer

California Instr. 15003iX-CTS-EOS 310856 11/13/2009 11/13/2010

Application for EN 61000-4-11 (Version 1.18) Software AC Source GUI32 SW017 12/09/2009 12/09/2010

Digital Pocket Thermometer and Hydrometer Mannix SAM700BAR 211897 11/16/2009 11/16/2010

Results: The sample tested was found to Comply.

Page 60 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 61: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions and Voltage Variations Immunity Tests (IEC 61000-4-11: 2004) (EN 61000-4-11: 2004)

14.0

Test Setup

Photo:

Page 61 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003

Page 62: TEST REPORT · Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued: 04/29/2010 Intertek 2.0 Test Summary 1.0 Introduction and Conclusion Section Test Full Name Test Date Result 4.0 System setup

04/29/2010Report Number: 100034923ATL-003 Issued:Intertek

Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions and Voltage Variations Immunity Tests (IEC 61000-4-11: 2004) (EN 61000-4-11: 2004)

14.0

0 deg 180 deg

Test Specification #1 400 50 0 100 0.0 0.5 B(1)Test Specification #2 400 50 40 60 160.0 10 B(1)Test Specification #3 400 50 70 30 280.0 25 B(1)

Standard:Ambient Temperature: 21ºC

Relative Humidity: 55.0%Atmospheric Pressure: 971.6 mBars

Test Specif ication MatrixTest Specif ication #1: <5% of rated voltage, 0.5 periods, 0°, Criterion CTest Specif ication #2: 40% of rated voltage, 10 periods, 0°, Criterion CTest Specif ication #3: 70% of rated voltage, 25 periods, 0?, Criterion CTest Specif ication #4: N/A

Test Note: N/A

Notes:

Result ClassificationVoltage

Test Level (%)

restored, the EUT continued to perform as intended w ithout user intervention.

Voltage Dip (%)

(1) With interruptions, the EUT w ould briefly sputter (as it should w ith any loss of pow er), and w hen pow er w as fully

Rated Voltage (Vac)

EN 55014-2 Cat II

Test Voltage(Vac)

Specification Frequency(Hz)

Duration (Periods)

Data:

Page 62 of 62EMC Report for Hayward Pool Products on the Swimming Pool Heat Pump, Model SHE3003


Recommended