+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title:...

Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title:...

Date post: 27-Jun-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
22
Copyright 2017 1 Thanks to Scott Adams and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990)
Transcript
Page 1: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

1

Thanks to Scott Adamsand Dilbert (11 Feb 1990)

Page 2: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

2

How to Deliver an Unwelcome Message Without Being Shot

Content Analysis in Support of Critical Theory Research

Roger ClarkeXamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, Canberra

Visiting Professor, U.N.S.W., A.N.U.

http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/CACT{.html, .ppt}

Bled eConference – 20 June 2017

Page 3: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

3

A Personal Problem

A perfectly good paper

(just ask the author)

was rejected by the reviewers

Page 4: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

4

A Personal Problem

The Apparent Reasons• Lack of robustness of the research method• Dismay about the fact that the paper

subjected Special Issue papers to criticism

A perfectly good paper

(just ask the author)

was rejected by the reviewers

Page 5: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

5

The Research

• Applied 'Researcher Perspective' Theory(Clarke 2016, in the Bled Proceeedings)

• Assessed the papers in a Special Issue:'Personal Data Markets', EM 25,2 (Jun 2015)

• Concluded that the papers:• considered only one side of the market• were strongly committed to the

corporate (data-buyer's) perspective

Page 6: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

6

Personal Data MarketsParticipants / Stakeholders

PLUS:Data Subjects,

whose data is traded

Page 7: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

7

The Meta-Questions

• What guidance is available in relation to secondary research whose raw data is published academic papers?

• What particular approaches need to be adopted when the theory-lens through which the observation is being performed arises from critical theory research?

• What guidance exists for expressing the outcomes of research of this nature?

Page 8: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

8

The Research Objective

Enhance the publishability of the research,by taking the following steps:

• Ground the content analysis technique more frmly in the research methods literature

• Demonstrate the appropriateness of constructive criticism of published works

• Improve the expression of the results

Page 9: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

9

Somewhat Relevant Techniques – 1 of 3Qualitative Research Techniques

Sources• Natural Settings

(Field Research)• Contrived Settings

(Laboratory Experiments)• Mixed Settings (e.g.

interviews conducted in the subject's workplace)

Forms• Text• Speech• Natural Non-Verbal

(Behaviour)• Non-Verbal, Non-Textual

(Questionnaire Responses)

Ethnography, Grounded Theory, Phenomenology

Page 10: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

10

Somewhat Relevant Techniques – 2 of 3Informal Literature Reviews

"Traditional literature reviews ... commonly focus on the range and diversity of primary research using a selective, opportunistic and discursive approach to identifying and interpreting relevant literature"

(Oakley 2003, p.23)

Page 11: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

11

Okoli & Schabram 2010

Somewhat Relevant

Techniques3 of 3

Systematic Literature Reviews

Page 12: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

12

A More Relevant TechniqueContent Analysis

"The interpretation of the content of text data through the systematic classifcation process of coding and identifying themes or patterns"

Hsieh & Shannon (2005)

• Conventional Content Analysis /

Emergent Coding• Directed Content Analysis /

A Priori Coding• Summative Content Analysis• (Computational Content Analysis

– Debortoli et al. 2016)

Page 13: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

13

Criticism is vital to Scientific Progress

• A theory is scientifc if it deals in statements that are empirically falsifable

• Progress depends on attempts to demonstrate falsity of theoretical statements (Popper 1963)

• But 'normal science' is conducted within a 'paradigm' and subject to conventions

• 'Paradigm shifts' are resisted, and only occur after substantial 'anomaly accumulation' (Kuhn 1962)

Page 14: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

14

And the IS Disciplineis Wary of Criticism

• "In contrast to specifc and critical reviewsof individual papers, tell the reader what patterns you are seeing in the literature".'Do not fall into the trap of being overly critical"(Webster & Watson 2002)

• "Papers should be in apposition rather than in opposition"[i.e. position things side by side or close together] (Straub 2009)

Page 15: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

15

Schools of Thought or Approaches to Research

• Positivism• Interpretivism

• Design Science

• An odd bedfellow:Critical Research / Critical Theory Research

Page 16: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

16

Key Elements of Critical Research

• Critique of Power Relationships• Transformation / Instrumentalism

with the needs of society in focus• Insight / Depth of Study• Refexivity / Self-Questioning

Myers 1997, Cecez-Kezmanovich 2001, Myers & Klein 2011

Page 17: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

17

Hermeneutic Approach

for Conducting

Literature Reviews

Boell & Cecez-Kecmanovic (2014)

Page 18: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

18

Critical Discourse Analysis

• IS is subject to 'Ideological Hegemony'

• Ideological Hegemony refers to dominant thought patterns and worldviews, engrained in a discipline and beyond scrutiny, concerning:

• framing of research topics and questions• choices of theories and research methods

• So assess power relationships between actors, and evaluate comprehensibility, truthfulness, legitimacy and sincerity

Habermas 1984, Cukier et al. 2009, Wall et al. 2015

Page 19: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

19

Implications for the Research Project• Make clear that 'researcher perspective' theory

is a product of critical theory research• Be specifc about the method's use of repetitive loops

and introspective questioning• Distinguish preliminary 'orientational reading'

from subsequent, deep 'analytical reading'• Depict as directed content analysis using a priori coding,

and provide (relevant) quantifcation• Be specifc about how coding reliability is achieved• Stress the issue of 'legitimacy', and show that the papers

do not represent all stakeholder perspectives• Assume that 'hegemonic participation' is unconscious

Page 20: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

20

Critical Content Analysis

Themes

• A Personal Problem• The Research Objective• Content Analysis• The Role of Criticism in Research• Critical Theory• A Solution

Page 21: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

21

Thanks to Scott Adamsand Dilbert (15 Mar 1999)

Page 22: Thanks to Scott Adams Copyright 2017 and Dilbert (11 Feb 1990) 1 · 2018. 8. 19. · Title: Critical Content Analysis Author: Roger Clarke Created Date: 6/20/2017 9:52:25 AM

Copyright2017

22

How to Deliver an Unwelcome Message Without Being Shot

Content Analysis in Support of Critical Theory Research

Roger ClarkeXamax Consultancy Pty Ltd, Canberra

Visiting Professor, U.N.S.W., A.N.U.

http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/CACT{.html, .ppt}

Bled eConference – 20 June 2017


Recommended