Date post: | 04-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | kellie-hinton |
View: | 27 times |
Download: | 2 times |
The 3 rd Meeting of Parallel/Coordinated Audit on Disaster Preparedness
Preparedness
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Towards
Joint Report!..
Kick-off Meeting1st Meeting in Antalya, 25 October 2011
Scope of the parallel audit
Audit types/audit perspective
How to design study
Preliminary Schedule
Next steps
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
First Steps
Obtain background knowledge and information needed
to understand the entity to be audited, to allow on assessment of the problem and risk to plan the study to specify staffing requirements to determine the study timetable
Prepare the study proposal.Plan the studyDetermine audit objectives and methodologyFormulate the audit criteria.
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Discussion Topics in the 2st Meeting in Ankara, 25-26 April 2012
How should this Parallel Audit be
Conducted?
In what form and to what extent should
the participating SAIs share
information?
In what form should the audit results be
documented?Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Survey Structure
Part A: Audit Design
Part B: Parallel Audit Results
Part C: The Draft Guidelines for Auditing Disaster Preparedness
Part D: Cooperation among SAIs
Part E: Next Steps of Parallel Audit
Part F: Closure
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Content for Joint Reports Preamble Introduction/ Background Scope and objectives of parallel audit Participating SAIs event analysis and risk assessment (types of disaster; Disaster information system etc.) Common audit methodology
Summary Part I Joint conclusions and recommendations/ Different Examples Part II Comparative analysis and assessment of auditing of participating SAIs. Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to disaster preparedness Assessment of governance structure based upon organization& coordination structure Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS, GPRS, GPS, early warning systems Evaluation of training activities and public awareness campaigns Analysis of financial structure concerning disaster preparedness Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area resilient
Part III Summary of National audits on disaster preparedness. (Objectives and scope of the audit, common criteria, risks to VFM, key findings of the audit, good practice examples)
Part IV Lesson learned for SAIs
Improving International and Regional Collaboration to Struggle against disaster Importance of International and Regional Collaboration The Need for the International and Regional Initiatives Development Enhancing the Efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision)
Introduction/ Background
Scope and objectives of the parallel audit Participating SAIs Identification of the characteristics of the
disaster in the countries of participating SAIs.Q.5 : Please give information about the characteristics of the
disaster such as event analysis and risk assessment in your country by taking into consideration the ISSAI 5510 part 3, p.13.4 and 13.5. It would be better to support information with statistics and graphics.
Common points of audit methodology
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Introduction/ Background Common Audit Methodology
Data and document analysis Interview Questionnaire Analysis plans and budget, etc. Observation / physical examination / site
visit Confirmation (oral and written) Verification list
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Audit Questions& Criteria
Common Questions& CriteriaAzerbaijan, Chile, India(+), Indonesia (+/-),
Pakistan, Romania (flood), Romania
(earthquake+/-), Turkey Different Questions & CriteriaPhilippines, Ukraine
Lack of informationNetherland (+/-?)
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Part I: Joint Findings/ Conclusions and Recommendations
SAIs Findings/Conclusions Recommendations
Azerbaijan formulation (?) -
Chile comparable comparable
India - -
Indonesia Different example (not whole text ?)
Different example
Netherland - -
Pakistan comparable comparable
Philippines Different example Different example
Romania (Flood) comparable comparable
Romania (Earthquake) (mostly) comparable (mostly) comparable
Turkey comparable comparable
Ukraine Different example Different example
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Part II: Comparative Analysis and Assessment of Participating SAIs’
Audits Specification of policy gabs and legal arrangement related to
disaster preparedness Assessment of governance structure based upon
organization& coordination structure Evaluation of national strategies, national and local planning. Usage and evaluation of management tools such as GIS,
GPRS, GPS, early warning systems Evaluation of training activities and public awareness
campaigns Assessment of financial structure concerning disaster
preparedness Assessment of projects & programs for making urban area
resilientParallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Concerning Legal Framework
When disaster law was published, Whether the law is satisfactory in terms of
effective management and coordination of disaster preparedness activities,
Which aspects of the legislation is deficient/missing,
Which kind of activities related to disaster preparedness are left outside the scope of this law
Specification of policy gabs etc. Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Part III: Summary of National Audits on Disaster Preparedness
Scope and objectives of the audit,Criteria, Risks to VFM, Key findings/ conclusions Good practice examplesOther issues which SAI wants to
emphasise Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Part IV: Lesson learned for SAIs
Improving international and regional collaboration to struggle against disaster
Importance of international and regional collaboration
The need for the development of international and regional initiatives
Enhancing the efficiency of the SAIs (Monitoring and supervision)
Other issues which participating SAIs want to emphasise
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
The Schedule for the Parallel/Coordinated Audit
October 2011 Kick-off meeting in October 2011
Preparing the audit proposal
April 2012 The 2nd meeting of parallel audit
common question & criteria
February 2013 The 3rd meeting of parallel audit
the individual SAIs’ audit results to TCA
25 th February 2013 Sending of lack of information to TCA
May 2013 Preparing the draft joint of report
Adaptation of the Exposure ISSAI 5510
July 2013 Sending the draft joint report to participating SAIs
November 2013 Finalizing the joint report and approval
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013
Thank you
Arife COŞKUNTurkish Court of Accounts (TCA)e-mail: [email protected]
Tel: +90 312 295 37 01
Parallel/coordinated audit on disaster preparedness, 3rd Meeting in İstanbul, 07-08 February 2013