+ All Categories
Home > Law > The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Date post: 12-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: myplace-conveyancing
View: 164 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
26
The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls Is your business protected?
Transcript
Page 1: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Is your businessprotected?

Page 2: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

The contents of this presentation are for information purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. 

If you have any particular concerns or queries, please contact our office for specific advice.

Disclaimer

Page 3: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls
Page 4: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Employment law in Victoria is derived from 3 sources:

• Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth);

• Modern Awards or Enterprise Agreements; and

• Common law.

The legal framework

Page 5: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

The impact on a business of non-compliance with employment laws can be significant and can include:

• Distraction from running the business• Staff issues including poor morale and lost productivity• Substantial back-payments • Prosecution by Fair Work Ombudsman seeking pecuniary

penalties

Why does it matter?

Page 6: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• The Fair Work Ombudsman has broad reaching powers to investigate non-compliance and ensure any underpayments are rectified

FWO complaints and audits 2006-2014

Fair Work Ombudsman

      2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

Complaints received   13,740.00 23,728.00 22,670.00 23,698.00 21,890.00 23,366.00 24,678.00 24,103.00

Complaints finalised   11,977.00 24,207.00 23,338.00 21,070.00 22,253.00 28,412.00 26,574.00 25,650.00

Underpayments recovered $13.5m $36.6m $32.5m $21.3m $26.2m $39.8m $20.5m $23m

No. of employee   6,754.00 15,842.00 28,648.00 9,823.00 16,088.00 18,497.00 12,134.00  

$ per complaint   $1,100.00 $2,310.00 $1,350.00 $2,168.00 $1,541.00 $2,152.00 $1,689 

       

Audits and campaigns   3,119.00 4,800.00 7,080.00 3,678.00 6,779.00 6,547.00 5,675.00 4,567.00

Underpayments recovered $1.85m $13.4m $5.9m $4.9m $4.7m $6.16m $3.9m $4.0m

Page 7: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• Pecuniary penalties imposed on businesses for breaches of the FW Act and awards in comparison to quantum of underpayments

Fair Work Ombudsman

Page 8: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• The most frequently complained about and litigated area is breaches of wages and conditions

Fair Work Ombudsman

Page 9: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• The maximum amount of penalties for breach have increased 54.5% since 28 December 2012

• The current maximum penalties for each breach are: $10,200 for an individual; and $51,000 for a corporation.

• Most prosecutions by the FWO relate to multiple breaches and seek the imposition of penalties on both the employer entity, the Directors or Managers and others involved in the breaches

Fair Work Ombudsman

Page 10: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• Directors and others who run businesses must ensure that the employing entity complies with its employment law obligations to avoid personal liability

• The accessory liability provisions in the FW Act are a commonly overlooked source of potential personal liability

• Section 550(1) of the FW Act provides that “A person who is involved in a contravention of a civil liability provision is taken to have contravened that provision”

• Section 550(2) further provides that “a person is involved in a contravention if, and only if, the person:a) has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention; orb) Has induced the contravention, whether by threats or promises or otherwise;

orc) Has been in any way, by act or omission, directly or indirectly, knowingly

concerned in or party to the contravention; ord) Has conspired with others to effect the contravention.

Accessorial liability

Page 11: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ross Geri Pty Ltd & Ors [2014] FCCA 959 (6 June 2014)

• A Strathfieldsaye security business was prosecuted in the Federal Circuit Court for various contraventions of the FW Act and pre-reform award that occurred between 2006 and 2011

• The underpayments to 4 casual employees totalled $89,117• The business paid flat rates to its staff that did not meet minimum

requirements for overtime rates, shift loadings, weekend and public holiday penalty rates

• The Court imposed fines totalling $147,708 for 8 categories of contraventions: Company $110,880 The husband Director $22,176.00; and The wife employee (responsible for payroll) $14,652.00.

Recent case

Page 12: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ross Geri Pty Ltd & Ors (continued)

• Fines of $147,708 were imposed despite: The company being “a relatively small, family owned and operated

business in a regional town” with few assets– ‘No less than large corporate employers, small businesses have an

obligation to meet minimum employment standards and their employees, rightly, have an expectation that this will occur. When it does not it will, normally, be necessary to mark the failure by imposing an appropriate monetary sanction. Such a sanction must be imposed at a meaningful level’

– ‘Employers must not be left under the impression that because of their size or financial difficulty that they are able to breach an award. Obligations by employers for adherence to industrial instruments arise regardless of their size. Such a factor should be of limited relevance to a Court’s consideration of penalty.”

A recent quarterly profit and loss statement showing a net loss of $383,496.46

In addition to the underpayments of $89,117, the Respondents had incurred nearly $80,000 in legal fees

Recent case

Page 13: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Fair Work Ombudsman v Ross Geri Pty Ltd & Ors (continued)

• In relation to a statement from the husband Director below, the Court held that “these consequences are an inevitable result of proceedings under the FW Act, and are of no relevance to the question of penalty”.

“Working 7 days a week can be stressful as it is having limited time to spend with family. But the ongoing emotional toll trying to get through the unknown of the Fair Work case has been unbearable at time. It has caused a wedge in my marriage, I’m often unable to spend quality time with my son due to the fact that I need to work 24 hour shift just to get some money back into this business to pay my liabilities. And the insecurity of the ongoing viability of my business causes me so much stress that I am often unable to sleep and I no longer feel relaxed even when I am not working it is always playing on my mind. Shocked how I could have got it wrong, confusion trying to resolve it, embarrassment facing my clients and my employees.”

Recent case

Page 14: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Recent case

Page 15: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

1. Employment contracts

2. Award identification and compliance

3. Performance management

4. Correct classification – FT, PT, casual

5. Termination entitlements

Avoiding the Common Pitfalls

Page 16: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• When starting a new business, clients are often overwhelmed by the tasks required

• Imperative to get the employment framework correct from the start

• “Start” – starting a business, buying a business, new financial year, employing a new employee

Getting it right from the start

Page 17: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• Buying a business can often lead to unintended liabilities and inherited entitlements

• Wages costs often form the largest expense of the business – may lead to assumption the vendor’s rates of pay are correct

• The website of Fair Work Ombudsman contains many useful tools: The small business helpline 13 13 94 Small business page

fairwork.gov.au/find-help-for/small-business Online learning centre

o fairwork.gov.au/how-we-will-help/online-learning-centre

Buying a business

Page 18: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• A couple purchased a café in Mornington in 2010• Employed a part-time kitchen hand who worked at the café from October

2010 until February 2014• For most of her employment, the employee was paid just $11.50 an hour • New owners made two incorrect assumptions:

The rates of pay paid by the Vendor remained correct; Because the employee has a disability, Malt Cow mistakenly assumed

that she was receiving a supported wage • Employee was 18 when she started working at the café and was entitled

to pay increases on her 19th and 20th birthdays and minimum national wage increases each July thereafter

• Following a complaint to the FWO, an investigation found that she had been underpaid a total of $19,622 during her three-and-a-half years at the café.

Malt Cow Pty Ltd

Page 19: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

• Malt Cow was also found to have breached the Award when it reduced the employee’s rostered hours without documenting the change in writing

• Malt Cow agreed to sign an Enforceable Undertaking requiring it to: Back-pay all outstanding entitlements to the affected employee

within six months and apologise in writing for the conduct; Provide a report within a month on steps taken to ensure its

compliance with workplace laws; Post a workplace notice advising other employees of its

contraventions, giving a commitment that such behaviour will not occur again;

Undertake training on employer obligations under federal workplace laws, including managing employees with disabilities;

Audit the company’s compliance with workplace laws each year for the next three years; and

Make a $1000 donation to Disability Advocacy Victoria.

Malt Cow Pty Ltd

Page 20: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

1. Employment contract: Probationary period Policies and procedures; Fair Work Information Statement; Continuity clause; Annualised salary and off-set clauses; and Restraint of trade.

Employment Contract

Page 21: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

2. Award identification and compliance: Base rates of pay, overtime, penalties and allowances; Pay cycles and rosters; Inform employee of correct classification; Redundancy and consultancy obligations; and Wage increases.

Award identification & compliance

Page 22: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

3. Performance management: Position description and KPIs; Frequent discussions – positive and negative; The myth of 3 warnings.

Performance management

Page 23: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

4. Correct classification – FT, PT, casual, independent contractors Beware the long-term casual

o Casual loadings in addition to leave entitlementso Minimise risk with off-set clause in written contract

Incorrectly treating employees as contractors can lead to:o Prosecution for sham contractingo Mistakenly believing business is a small business under the FW Acto PAYG withholding penalty for not meeting their PAYG withholding

obligationso super guarantee charge (for not meeting their super obligations), made up

of: – super guarantee shortfall amounts (amount of super contributions that

should have been paid into a complying fund)– interest– an administration fee.

Correct classification

Page 24: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

5. Termination entitlements: Notice – NES v Contract; Payment in lieu; Garden leave; Annual leave loading; and Restraint of trade.

Termination entitlements

Page 25: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Questions?

Page 26: The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

The 5 Most Common Employment Pitfalls

Is your businessprotected?


Recommended