Date post: | 20-Jan-2017 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | rickard-waernelid |
View: | 16,794 times |
Download: | 5 times |
1
The 7 deadly sins of financial modelling
ModelOff Global Training Camp
Presented by Rickard Wärnelid Group CEO
London 4 December 2015
3
THE 7 DEADLY SINS OF FINANCIAL MODELLING
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
1
2
3
Inconsistency
Proudness of complexity
Non-guidance of model users
4
5
6
Ignorance of potential future events
Acceptance of poor presentation
Ignorance of the end user
7 Negligence in model management
7
INCONSISTENCY [1/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Workbooks
Individuals
Teams
Organisations
The World
9
PROUDNESS OF COMPLEXITY [2/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Complex solutions to common problems - Nested Ifs / Indirects, Index/Offset
Innovative functionality
Excessive / Undocumented VBA
12
NON-GUIDANCE OF MODEL USERS [3/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Documentation: Labels, cover sheet, user guide, version control
Summary sheet
Functional design: Styles, structure, conditional formatting
14
IGNORANCE OF POTENTIAL FUTURE EVENTS [4/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Flexible timing structure
Built in scenarios / sensitivities
Static: Lack of "spares", hard coding, inconsistent formulae, embedded
assumptions
15
Training Academy, financial modelling, valuations, project finance, LBO modelling, Excel, forecasting and VBA
1-6 months 2-6 weeks 3-36 months
5-70 years
New project/venture Decision process Decision Operations
• Board paper submission • Business cases • Equity investment
• Valuation process • Funding analysis • Project finance structure • PFI/758/P3 bid process
• Board paper submission • Bid submission • Financial close • IPO • Press release
• Construction reporting • System integration • Performance analysis • Service contracts
DECISION PROCESS EXAMPLE
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
16
BUILD FOR THE FUTURE – TIMING ARCHITECTURE
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
A financial model needs to be a dynamic representation of future scenarios. Using fully dynamic timing calculations provide our clients with flexibility to analyse a broad range of outcomes
17
SCENARIO ANALYSIS
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Scenario analysis is the core functionality of a financial model. Using a structured approach our clients gain deep strategic insights which support a stronger decision process.
18
ACCEPTANCE OF POOR PRESENTATION [5/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
No / bad styling
Lack of structure
Different styles across model
19
ACCEPTANCE OF POOR PRESENTATION [5/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Hidden rows Inconsistent formatting
20
FUNCTIONAL STYLES
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Our approach to financial modelling includes a continuous focus on functionality for flexible, structured and powerful analysis.
21
IGNORANCE OF THE END USER [6/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Purpose
Assumptions structure
Level of detail
Model architecture
Tailored outputs for purpose
22
STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
BANKS COMPANIES
ADVISORS DEVELOPMENT BANKS
DEVELOPERS INVESTORS
Financial model
23
NEGLIGENCE IN MODEL MANAGEMENT [5/7]
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Unqualified "Owner" / User
Unclear ownership of model/assumptions
Limited understanding of model interfaces
Lack of process – versions, calendar, distribution, etc.
26
FINANCIAL MODELLING ECOSYSTEM
Date ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Fund / Investor analysis
Board strategy model
12 months budget
ERP
Corporate model
Alternative business
cases
27
FINANCIAL MODELLING ECOSYSTEM
Date ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
Fund / Investo
r analysi
s
Board strategy model
12 months budget
10 year strateg
y
Operational cost
Corporate Model
Treasury Bank debt
model
Staff / HR
Performance monitoring
Tax
ERP
Stock exchange
communications
New ventures
28
THE 7 DEADLY SINS OF FINANCIAL MODELLING
ModelOff Global Training Camp - London 2015
1
2
3
Inconsistency
Proudness of complexity
Non-guidance of model users
4
5
6
Ignorance of potential future events
Acceptance of poor presentation
Ignorance of the end user
7 Negligence in model management