Date post: | 21-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | randolf-walton |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Agenda for Tax Reform in Ireland – Tax Expenditures
William H. Batt, Divisional Director, William H. Batt, Divisional Director,
Indecon International Economic ConsultantsIndecon International Economic Consultants
2020thth June 2008 June 2008
2
Presentation Structure
IntroductionDescription of Tax ExpendituresIssues re Review of Tax ExpendituresExamples and Outcomes from Indecon ReviewConcluding Remarks
3
Introduction
Context for Commission’s work in area of tax expenditures:» Proliferation of various tax incentive mechanisms and
schemes over long period» Increased focus on need to demonstrate value for
money in usage of public resources» Absence – until recently – of timely information on usage
and costs relating to different tax expenditures» Continued scarcity of information on outputs/benefits of
tax expenditures
4
Description of Tax Expenditures
Definition of tax expenditures:
“A tax expenditure can be defined as a transfer of public resources that is achieved by reducing tax obligations with respect to a benchmark tax, rather than by a direct expenditure” (OECD, 2003)
Tax expenditures, as distinct from public expenditures, may take a variety of forms, including:
»Exemptions»Allowances»Credits»Reliefs, including tax rate reductions»Tax deferrals
5
Description of Tax Expenditures
A wide range of different tax expenditure schemes/mechanisms have been employed in Ireland
Some (limited) examples of schemes/mechanisms include:» ‘Property-based’ and sector-specific taxation incentive schemes,
e.g. childcare facility scheme» ‘Area-based’ taxation incentive schemes – e.g. Section 23» Tax credits – e.g. R&D credits» Pension contribution relief
6
Issues re Review of Tax Expenditures
Introduction and operation of various tax expenditures over time in Ireland have reflected variety of policy contexts and rationales
Tax expenditures should be evaluated similarly to other public expenditure programmes => value for money imperative and both represent a cost to the taxpayer
Evaluation/review of tax expenditures should therefore follow Department of Finance’s guidance on evaluation of expenditure programmes:
» Relevance» Rationale» Effectiveness» Efficiency» Impact
7
Issues re Review of Tax Expenditures
Particular challenges involved in evaluation/review of tax expenditures: » Tax expenditures are passive in nature» Full costs of standard public expenditures typically known ex ante;
costs of tax expenditures are only known ex post => issue of take-up impacting on costs
» Issue of information – absence, until recent change in tax return requirements, of timely information on costs relating to different tax expenditures
» Very little information available on outputs/benefits of tax expenditures
8
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Instructive to consider evaluation of tax expenditures by reference to previous review work in this area
Detailed review of property-based tax incentive schemes was completed by Indecon for Department of Finance
This review considered 11 different property-based schemes across number of sectors/areas including tourism, medical, 3rd-level education, childcare sectors
9
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Useful, for purposes of this presentation, to focus on 2 examples of schemes reviewed by Indecon, namely:» Capital allowances for Hotels; and» Capital allowances for Childcare Facilities
10
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Key components of Indecon’s approach to review are set out below
Approach to and Key Components of Indecon Review
Quantification of Level of Activity, Investment/Capital Expenditures andExchequer Costs
Evaluation of Gross Economic Costs and Benefits
Adjustments for Deadweight, Displacement and Opportunity Cost ofResources Utilised
Analysis of Distributional Impacts of Benefits
Assessment of Alternatives and/or Refinements to Schemes
11
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Capital allowances for Hotels – key features:» Capital expenditure incurred up to 31 December 2004 on any
building or structure used as a hotel or holiday camp qualified for capital allowances
» Allowances of 15% of expenditures for first 6 years and 10% in seventh year
» Reduction to 4% per annum over 25 years on expenditure incurred after December 2004
» Finance Act 2004 provided extension of transitional arrangements from December 2004 to July 2006
» Capital allowances ring-fenced and could be offset only against rental income in case of individual, passive investors
12
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Number of significant changes in hotel sector in Ireland:» Considerable increase in room supply and quality since
mid-1990s (see overleaf), particularly in 4* category» Substantial increase in planning application activity
coincident with incentive scheme» Room and bed utilisation rates have fallen, however,
since 2000» Average size of hotels has increased» Evidence that incentive scheme has had significant
differential impact on supply and majority of hoteliers believe scheme has contributed to over-supply in sector
13
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Total Number of Hotel Rooms - 1996-2005
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
1996 1999 2002 2005
Source: Gulliver database
14
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Estimated Total Eligible Capital Expenditure on Hotels and Holiday Camps under the Tax Incentive Scheme
Detail Estimated Value - € Million
Total Cumulative Capital Expenditure – 2001-2005 664.4
Forecast for Future Capital Expenditure 977.0
Source: Indecon Calculations
15
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Exchequer Costs - Estimated Tax Revenue Foregone under the Tax Incentive Scheme for Hotels/Holiday Camps
Estimate € Million
Capital Expenditure to Date 664.4
Est. Additional/Future Capital Expenditure 977.0
Gross Tax Revenue Foregone 195.8
Estimated Economic Benefits (adjusted for opportunity cost of resources)
41.7
Tax contribution adjusted for Indirect Tax Revenues 75.2
Net Tax Revenue Foregone 120.5
Net Tax Revenue Foregone – adjusted for Deadweight 125.0
Source: Indecon calculations
16
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Capital allowances for Childcare Facilities:» Allowances available for expenditures on or after 2
December 1998 on construction, extension or refurbishment of approved childcare facilities
» 100% relief available in Year 1 or at 15% per annum for first 6 years and 10% in Year 7
» Clawback provision if building ceases to be used as a childcare facility within 10 years
» No termination date for incurring qualifying expenditure on this relief
17
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Capital allowances for Childcare Facilities – Activity:» Evidence of positive differential impact of tax relief
scheme on supply of childcare places (+37% between 1999 and 2004)
» However, demand has outstripped supply and childcare costs have continued to increase
18
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
€95
€85
€139€126
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2000 2005
Childcare Providers that have availed of the tax incentive scheme over the past 5 years
Childcare Providers that have not availed of the tax incentive scheme over the past 5 years
Av
era
ge
Co
st
of
Pla
ce
s -
€ p
er
We
ek
19
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Estimated Total Eligible Capital Expenditure on Childcare Facilities under the Tax Incentive Scheme
Detail Estimated Value - € Million
Total Cumulative Capital Expenditure – 2001-2005 30.7
Forecast for Future Capital Expenditure (based on planning applications in 2005)
21.2
Source: Indecon Calculations
20
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Exchequer Costs - Estimated Tax Revenue Foregone under the Tax Incentive Scheme for Childcare Facilities
Estimate € Million
Capital Expenditure to Date 30.7
Est. Additional/Future Capital Expenditure 21.2
Gross Tax Revenue Foregone 8.6
Estimated Economic Benefits (adjusted for opportunity cost of resources)
7.7
Tax contribution adjusted for Indirect Tax Revenues 3.5
Net Tax Revenue Foregone 5.1
Net Tax Revenue Foregone – adjusted for Deadweight 5.7
Source: Indecon calculations
21
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Number of general policy recommendations for future operation of property-based schemes on were issued:» Increase requirements for disclosure of key information to
Revenue and the Exchequer by investors/promoters» Decision on any new incentive schemes should be informed by
full appraisal of likely costs and benefits» Option of direct public expenditure rather than tax reliefs should
be considered» Need to specify defined lifespan for any schemes introduced» Consider potential cap on total annual allowances which can be
claimed by any one individual (distributional impacts)
22
Examples and Outcomes from Indecon Review
Specific recommendations re Hotels and Childcare schemes» “There should be no further extension of capital
allowances for hotels and holiday camps for projects which have not lodged a full and valid planning application before 31 December 2004”
» “Capital allowances for childcare facilities should continue subject to certain amendments”
23
Concluding Remarks
Large number of tax expenditure-based schemes/mechanisms have operated in the State
Increasing emphasis on demonstrating value for money and absence of information costs have prompted review and evaluation
Overall, while many schemes have generated benefits, Indecon analysis indicated that schemes, with limited exceptions, have served their purpose
Key issue of whether direct public supports would, in majority of cases, represent more efficient, effective and targeted usage of scarce resources