+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Date post: 25-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: shanta
View: 27 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
EVALUATION OF ROLE OF PCR IN DIAGNOSIS OF HERPETIC STROMAL KERATITIS & ENDOTHELIITIS AND CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME . Radhika Tandon , MD, DNB, FRCS, FRCOphth. Dr. Manoj Sharma, MD Dr. Bhavna Chawla , MS Dr Namrata Sharma, MD Prof. Jeewan.S.Titiyal , MD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
14
uthors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this post Radhika Tandon, MD, DNB, FRCS, FRCOphth Department of Cornea, Cataract & Refractive Surgery and *Ocular Microbiology Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre For Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS
Transcript
Page 1: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Radhika Tandon, MD, DNB, FRCS, FRCOphth

Department of Cornea, Cataract & Refractive Surgery and *Ocular Microbiology Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre For Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS

Page 2: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Table 1- Shedding of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) DNA in active stromal keratitis and / or endotheliitis, as detected by polymerase chain reaction analysis

of tear samples obtained from different method

*Data are the total no. of subjects with shedding of HSV-1 DNA/total no. of subjectsassessed (percentage of patients with shedding of HSV-1 DNA).

Authors (year) [PCR type]

Subjects, proportion (%)*

Sample method

Total Samplecollected

per subject,no.

Active stromal keratitis Endotheliitis

Yamamoto S et al. (1994) [Conventional PCR]

2/6(33.33%) - Schirmer’s 1

Kudo E et al. (1996) [Nested PCR] 5/15(33.33%) - Schirmer’s 3.3

Pramod NP et al.(2000 ) [(Conventional PCR] 12/40(30%) - Schirmer’s 2

Fukuda M et. al (2003) [Real-time PCR] 8/14(57%) 0/3 eye rinse

method 1

Fukuda M, Deai T, et al. (2008) ) [Real-time PCR] 13/22(59.1%) 0/3 eye rinse

method 1

Page 3: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

To evaluate the role of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in confirmation of diagnosis of clinically suspected Herpetic stromal keratitis or endotheliitis in tear samples

To evaluate the effect of antiviral therapy on test result.

Page 4: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Inclusion criteria › Clinically diagnosed cases of active stromal keratitis

and endotheliitis

Exclusion criteria › Pure epithelial keratitis with no stromal involvement› H/o previous oral acyclovir use within one month

Page 5: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Study group: 66 eyes( 59 patients)› 52 Unilateral & 7 Bilateral affected

Control group: 130 eyes of 90 patients› Contra lateral eye of 50* unilateral affected patients› Both eyes of 40 normal volunteers

• *2 patients had contralateral phthisis bulbi and sample from phthisical eye was not taken

Page 6: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Before starting treatment, tear samples from both eyes of patients were collected by fire polished microcapillary tube and subjected to PCR for HSV DNA detection

PCR Protocol› DNA extraction: commercial QI Amp DNA blood kit› Polymerase chain reaction

Primer-111 bp region of HSV 1 thymidine kinase gene (Hofgartner W T et. al Clinical chemistry, 1999)

Amplification- thermal cycler (Gene Amp PCR system 9700, applied biosystem, USA)

› Electrophoreses- in 2% agarose gel

Page 7: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Tab acyclovir 400 mg (5 times/day) × 7 day Tab acyclovir 400 mg (BD) × 6 months Topical steroid (1% prednisolone acetate)

Adjunct therapy was given as required Topical antibiotic Topical mydriatic (2% homide) Topical lubricant (preservative free) Analgesics( if required)

Page 8: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Follow up examination was done

Day 2, day 3-6, day-12, day 13-17, day 18-22 & at 3 mths

Repeat PCR was done 3 months after initiating treatment

Page 9: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Figure 1: Distribution of tear samples from various clinical categories

PUK=Peripheral ulcerative keratitisA= active Q= quiescentP= with perforationV= virus

Page 10: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

PUK=Peripheral ulcerative keratitisA= active Q= quiescentP= with perforationV= virus

Figure 2: PCR result in different clinical categories

Page 11: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

FPCR= PCR at follow-up (at 3 month from initiation of treatment)

Figure 3: PCR result in tear samples at presentation and at 3 months

Page 12: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

PCR

Negative

• Necrotizing keratitis with perforation (0/6)

• Recurrence in Graft (0/1)• Quiescent stromal keratitis (0/3)

Control sample

Positive 13 (20%)

(Active) • Stromal keratitis 8/30(26%)• Necrotizing keratitis 1/3 (33%)• Keratouveitis 2/11 (22%) • Endotheliitis 2/9 (22%)

Page 13: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

20% cases of active Herpetic stromal keratitis and endotheliitis had positive tear sample PCR test result. All positive cases showed good response to treatment and no HSV DNA was detected after antiviral therapy

Positive PCR test result can therefore be used as a marker of active viral replication in cases of active stromal keratitis & endotheliitis

Page 14: The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.

Address for Correspondence : Professor Radhika Tandon

([email protected]) Dr. RP Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi 110029


Recommended