+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice,...

The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice,...

Date post: 27-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
223
logo1 Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem The Axiom of Choice Bernd Schr ¨ oder Bernd Schr¨ oder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science The Axiom of Choice
Transcript
Page 1: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

The Axiom of Choice

Bernd Schroder

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 2: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Why Do We Need More Axioms?

1. The final three axioms we discuss could be motivated bythe desire to “count past infinity” ...

2. ... and by the desire to have “standard sizes” for infinitesets.

3. Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’sLemma” incarnation is used every so often throughoutmathematics.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 3: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Why Do We Need More Axioms?1. The final three axioms we discuss could be motivated by

the desire to “count past infinity” ...

2. ... and by the desire to have “standard sizes” for infinitesets.

3. Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’sLemma” incarnation is used every so often throughoutmathematics.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 4: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Why Do We Need More Axioms?1. The final three axioms we discuss could be motivated by

the desire to “count past infinity” ...2. ... and by the desire to have “standard sizes” for infinite

sets.

3. Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’sLemma” incarnation is used every so often throughoutmathematics.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 5: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Why Do We Need More Axioms?1. The final three axioms we discuss could be motivated by

the desire to “count past infinity” ...2. ... and by the desire to have “standard sizes” for infinite

sets.3. Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s

Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughoutmathematics.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 6: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom.

The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 7: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice.

Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 8: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets.

Then there is a function f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 9: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I.

The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 10: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 11: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition.

Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 12: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets.

The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 13: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Axiom. The Axiom of Choice. Let {Ai}i∈I be an indexed familyof sets. Then there is a function f : I→

⋃i∈I

Ai so that f (i) ∈ Ai

for all i ∈ I. The function is also called a choice function.

Definition. Let {Ai}i∈I be a family of sets. The product ∏i∈I

Ai

of the Ai is defined as the set of all functions f : I→⋃i∈I

Ai with

f (i) ∈ Ai for all i ∈ I.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 14: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem.

Intersection and union are completely distributive.Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets. Then the following hold.

1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 15: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Intersection and union are completely distributive.

Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets. Then the following hold.

1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 16: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Intersection and union are completely distributive.Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets.

Then the following hold.1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 17: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Intersection and union are completely distributive.Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets. Then the following hold.

1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 18: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Intersection and union are completely distributive.Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets. Then the following hold.

1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 19: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Intersection and union are completely distributive.Let {Ji}i∈I be a family of index sets and let {Cij}i∈I,j∈Ji be afamily of sets. Then the following hold.

1.⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij =⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

2.⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij =⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 20: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).

Let x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 21: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 22: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 23: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji.

Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 24: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx

∈⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 25: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i)

⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 26: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 27: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i).

Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 28: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I.

But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 29: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 30: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 1).Let x ∈

⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I there is a ji with x ∈ Ciji .

For each i ∈ I set g(i) := ji. Thenx ∈

⋂i∈I

Cig(i) ⊆⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Conversely, let

x ∈⋃

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋂i∈I

Cif (i). Then there is a choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji so

that x ∈ Cif (i) for all i ∈ I. But then x ∈⋃j∈Ji

Cij for every i ∈ I.

Hence x ∈⋂i∈I

⋃j∈Ji

Cij.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 31: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).

Let x ∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 32: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij.

Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 33: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 34: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x

∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 35: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j

⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 36: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0)

⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 37: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 38: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 39: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij.

Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 40: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji .

Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 41: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 42: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i)

and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 43: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 44: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (part 2).Let x ∈

⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then there is an i0 ∈ I so that x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j.

For every choice function f ∈∏i∈I

Ji we have

x ∈⋂

j∈Ji0

Ci0j ⊆ Ci0f (i0) ⊆⋃i∈I

Cif (i). Therefore x ∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

For the reverse inclusion, let x 6∈⋃i∈I

⋂j∈Ji

Cij. Then for every i ∈ I

there is a ji ∈ Ji so that x 6∈ Ciji . Define g ∈∏i∈I

Ji by g(i) := ji.

Then x 6∈⋃i∈I

Cig(i) and hence x 6∈⋂

f∈∏i∈I Ji

⋃i∈I

Cif (i).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 45: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition.

Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 46: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set.

A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 47: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain.

An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 48: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 49: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma.

Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 50: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 51: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 52: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 53: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let X be an ordered set. A totally ordered subset Cof X is also called a chain. An element m ∈ X so that for allx ∈ X we have that m≤ x implies m = x is called a maximalelement of X.

Lemma. Let X be a set, and let Z ⊆P(X) be a nonempty set ofsubsets of X, ordered by set containment ⊆ and with thefollowing properties.

1. For every set C ∈ Z we have that every subset of C is anelement of Z.

2. For every chain (with respect to set containment) C ⊆ Z,the union

⋃C of C is an element of Z.

Then Z has a maximal element (with respect to setcontainment).

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 54: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup).

Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 55: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}.

The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 56: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X.

By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 57: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X

so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 58: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.

For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :={

x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z}

and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 59: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}

and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 60: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 61: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z

, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 62: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z.

Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 63: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (initial setup). Consider the indexed family{i}i∈P(X)\{ /0}. The union of this family is X. By the Axiom ofChoice, there is a choice function f : P(X)\{ /0}→ X so thatf (A) ∈ A holds for all A ∈P(X)\{ /0}.For each C ∈ Z, define the set EC :=

{x ∈ X \C : C∪{x} ∈ Z

}and let

g(C) :={

C∪{

f (EC)}

; if EC 6= /0,C; if EC = /0.

If M ∈ Z satisfies g(M) = M, then there is no element x ∈ X \Mso that M∪{x} ∈ Z, which means that M is maximal in Z. Theproof will be done once we find an M ∈ Z with g(M) = M.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 64: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers).

A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 65: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff

1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 66: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and

2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 67: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and

3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then⋃

C ∈ T .The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 68: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 69: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.

Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 70: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.

Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 71: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.

Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 72: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.

Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 73: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A.

First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 74: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (towers). A subset T ⊆ Z will be called a tower iff1. /0 ∈ T , and2. If C ∈ T , then g(C) ∈ T , and3. If C ⊆ T is a chain in T , then

⋃C ∈ T .

The set Z contains at least one tower, because Z itself is a tower.Moreover, the intersection of any set of towers is a tower, too.Let T0 be the intersection of all towers that are contained in Z.Then T0 is not empty, because /0 ∈ T0.Call an element C ∈ T0 comparable iff for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C or C ⊆ A. First note that, clearly, /0 is a comparable set.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 75: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable).

Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 76: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set.

Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 77: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}.

We will prove that U is atower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 78: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower

, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 79: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0

, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 80: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable.

Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 81: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U.

Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 82: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U.

Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 83: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A.

In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 84: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U.

In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 85: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A).

Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 86: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A

and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 87: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C

, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 88: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible.

Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 89: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C

, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 90: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U.

In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 91: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C.

Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 92: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable). Let C ∈ T0be a fixed comparable set. Consider the setU :=

{A ∈ T0 : A⊆ C or g(C)⊆ A

}. We will prove that U is a

tower, which implies that U = T0, which implies that g(C) iscomparable. Clearly, /0 ∈ U. Now let A ∈ U. Because C iscomparable, we have A = C or A⊂ C or C ⊂ A. In case A = C,we have g(A) = g(C)⊇ g(C), which means g(A) ∈ U. In caseA⊂ C, because C is comparable, g(A)⊆ C or C ⊂ g(A). Strictcontainment C ⊂ g(A) would mean (by A⊂ C) that C has atleast one more element than A and g(A) has at least one moreelement than C, which is impossible. Thus, in case A⊂ C wemust have g(A)⊆ C, which means g(A) ∈ U. In the last case,C ⊂ A, we note that A 6⊆ C. Thus, by definition of U,g(C)⊆ A⊆ g(A) and g(A) ∈ U.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 93: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).

Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 94: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain.

If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 95: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U.

Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 96: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A.

But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 97: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C

, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 98: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A

and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 99: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U.

Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 100: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower.

By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 101: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U

and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 102: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0.

Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 103: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A.

So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 104: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (C comparable implies g(C) comparable, concl.).Finally, let A ⊆ U be a chain. If C ⊇ A for all A ∈A , thenC ⊇

⋃A and

⋃A ∈ U. Otherwise, there is an A ∈A so that

C ⊂ A. But then A 6⊆ C, which implies g(C)⊆ A⊆⋃

A and

hence⋃

A ∈ U. Thus U ⊆ T0 is a tower. By definition of T0,T0 ⊆ U and hence U = T0. Thus for all A ∈ T0 we haveA⊆ C ⊆ g(C) or g(C)⊆ A. So if C ∈ T0 is comparable, theng(C) is comparable, too.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 105: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements).

Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 106: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0.

If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 107: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C .

Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 108: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A.

Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 109: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.

Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 110: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower.

BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 111: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable.

By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 112: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain.

Because T0 is a tower, we have⋃

T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 113: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0.

Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 114: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0

, which means that g(⋃

T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 115: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0.

By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 116: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0

, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 117: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 118: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 119: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (existence of maximal elements). Let C ⊆ T0 be a chainof comparable elements and let A ∈ T0. If there is a C ∈ C withA⊆ C, then A⊆ C ⊆

⋃C . Otherwise for all C ∈ C we have

C ⊆ A, which means⋃

C ⊆ A. Consequently, if C ⊆ T0 is a

chain of comparable elements, then the union⋃

C iscomparable.Thus the set of comparable elements in T0 is a tower. BecauseT0 is the intersection of all towers, every element of T0 iscomparable. By definition of comparable elements, T0 is achain. Because T0 is a tower, we have

⋃T0 ∈ T0. Hence

g(⋃

T0

)∈ T0, which means that g

(⋃T0

)⊆⋃

T0. By

definition of g, g(⋃

T0

)⊇⋃

T0, so g(⋃

T0

)=⋃

T0.

Hence M :=⋃

T0 is the desired maximal element.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 120: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem.

Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 121: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma.

Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 122: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound.

Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 123: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 124: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof.

Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 125: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.

If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 126: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too.

Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 127: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z.

Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 128: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M

with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 129: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion.

This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 130: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X

, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 131: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X

, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 132: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z.

But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 133: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M.

Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 134: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m.

Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 135: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z.

So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 136: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x.

Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 137: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 138: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Zorn’s Lemma. Let X be a nonempty ordered set sothat every chain in X has an upper bound. Then X has amaximal element.

Proof. Let Z be the set of all chains in X, ordered by inclusion.If C ∈ Z, then every subset of C is in Z, too. Moreover, theunion of every chain in Z is again an element of Z. Hence Z hasa maximal element M with respect to inclusion. This set M hasan upper bound m in X, and M∪{m} is a chain in X, that is,M∪{m} ∈ Z. But M is maximal in Z, so m ∈M. Now let x ∈ Xsatisfy x≥m. Then M∪{x} ∈ Z. So x ∈M and then m≥ x, thatis, m = x. Therefore, m is maximal in X.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 139: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem.

Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 140: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set.

Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 141: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)

= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 142: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1}

is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 143: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 144: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof.

Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 145: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A.

F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 146: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable.

F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 147: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion.

Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 148: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C

, and it will be abijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 149: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A

(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 150: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise).

Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 151: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F .

Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 152: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.

Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 153: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F .

Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 154: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.

Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 155: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function.

Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 156: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C

, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 157: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F

, contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 158: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Theorem. Let A be an infinite set. Then(A×{0}

)∪(A×{1}

)= A×{0,1} is equivalent to A.

Proof. Let F be the set of all bijective functionsf : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A. F 6= /0, because it contains allthe bijective functions f : X×{0,1}→ X, where X ⊆ A iscountable. F is ordered by set inclusion. Moreover for anychain C ⊆F we can form the union u :=

⋃C , and it will be a

bijective function u : Xu×{0,1}→ Xu for some subset Xu ⊆ A(good exercise). Now u is an upper bound for C in F . Thus thehypotheses of Zorn’s Lemma are satisfied.Let h : X×{0,1}→ X be a maximal element of F . Supposefor a contradiction that A\X contains a countably infinite set C.Let b : C×{0,1}→ C be a bijective function. Then t : h∪b is abijective function between (X∪C)×{0,1} and X∪C, that is,t ∈F , contradiction.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 159: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.).

Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 160: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite.

If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 161: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0

,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 162: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A.

Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 163: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0.

By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 164: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite.

Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 165: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.

Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 166: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C.

Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 167: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite.

Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 168: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction

and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 169: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction.

Then t :=(

h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 170: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 171: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Therefore A\X cannot be infinite. If A\X = /0,then the function h is the desired bijection between A×{0,1}and A. Finally consider the case that A\X 6= /0. By the above,A\X is finite. Let C ⊆ X be a countably infinite subset of X.Let R⊆ C be an |A\X|-element subset of C. Then C \R is stillcountably infinite. Let p : h−1[C]→ C \R be a bijectivefunction and let q : (A\X)×{0,1}→ A\X∪R be a bijectivefunction. Then t :=

(h\h|h−1[C]

)∪p∪q is the desired bijective

function with domain A×{0,1} and range A.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 172: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition.

Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 173: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.

Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 174: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total order

and every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 175: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 176: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example.

N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 177: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 178: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 179: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem.

Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 180: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem.

Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 181: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered.

That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 182: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Definition. Let S be a set and let ≤⊆ S×S be an order relation.Then ≤ is called a well-order (relation) iff it is a total orderand every nonempty subset of S has a smallest element withrespect to ≤.

Example. N is well-ordered.

Theorem. Well-ordering Theorem. Every set can bewell-ordered. That is, for every set S, there is a well-orderrelation ≤⊆ S×S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 183: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof.

Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 184: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S.

Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 185: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0.

For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 186: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff

D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 187: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2

, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 188: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1

, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 189: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.

Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 190: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X

(good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 191: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise).

Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 192: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 193: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation:

Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 194: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial.

Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 195: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤.

For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 196: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x.

Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 197: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′.

Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 198: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.

Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 199: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof. Let X be the set of all well-order relations ≤⊆ D×D,where D is a subset of S. Then X 6= /0. For any two well-orderrelations ≤1⊆ D1×D1 and ≤2⊆ D2×D2 in X define ≤1v≤2iff D1 ⊆ D2, every d2 ∈ D2 \D1 is a strict ≤2-upper bound ofD1, and ≤2 |D1×D1 =≤1.Then v is an order relation on X (good exercise). Let C ⊆ X bea chain and let ≤:=

⋃C .

≤ is an order relation: Reflexivity is trivial. Let D be thedomain of the relation ≤. For antisymmetry, let x,y ∈ D be sothat x≤ y and y≤ x. Then there is a ≤′∈ C with domain D′ sothat x,y ∈ D′. Hence x≤′ y and y≤′ x, which implies x = y.Transitivity is proved similarly.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 200: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.).

Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 201: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.

Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 202: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D.

Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 203: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′.

There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 204: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′.

Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 205: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′.

Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 206: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′.

Finally, because ≤=⋃

C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. Thisdoes not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 207: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′.

Thisdoes not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 208: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.

For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 209: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D.

Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 210: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0.

Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 211: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a.

Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 212: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′.

Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 213: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A.

Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 214: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order.

Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 215: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (cont.). Now let ≤′∈ C and let D′ be the domain of ≤′.Clearly, D′ ⊆ D. Let d ∈ D\D′ and let d′ ∈ D′. There is a≤′′∈ C with domain D′′ so that ≤′v≤′′ and d ∈ D′′ \D′. Butthen d ≥′′ d′, which means d > d′. Hence d is a strict ≤-upperbound of D′. Finally, because ≤=

⋃C , ≤ |D′×D′ =≤′. This

does not establish that ≤ is an upper bound of C , because westill do not know if ≤∈ X.For ≤∈ X, let A⊆ D be a nonempty subset of D. Then there is a≤′∈ C with domain D′ so that A∩D′ 6= /0. Because ≤′ is awell-order, A∩D′ has a ≤′-smallest element a. Because≤ |D′×D′ =≤′, a is the ≤-smallest element of A∩D′. Becauseall elements of D\D′ are ≤-strict upper bounds of D′, a is the≤-smallest element of A. Therefore (simple exercise, maybe toosimple) ≤ is a well-order. Hence it is a v-upper bound of C .

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 216: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.).

By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 217: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤.

Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 218: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D.

Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 219: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S.

Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 220: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D.

Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 221: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤.

Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 222: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice

Page 223: The Axiom of Choice - University of Southern Mississippi · 3.Other than that, the Axiom of Choice, in its “Zorn’s Lemma” incarnation is used every so often throughout mathematics.

logo1

Choice Functions Zorn’s Lemma Well-Ordering Theorem

Proof (concl.). By Zorn’s Lemma, X has a v-maximal element≤. Then ≤ is a well-order with domain D. Suppose for acontradiction that D 6= S and let s ∈ D\S. Define ≤′ to be anorder relation on D∪{s} so that ≤′ |D×D =≤ and so that s is astrict ≤′-upper bound of D. Then ≤′∈ X is a strict v-upperbound of ≤, contradicting the maximality of ≤. Hence ≤ mustbe a well-order for S.

Bernd Schroder Louisiana Tech University, College of Engineering and Science

The Axiom of Choice


Recommended