Date post: | 27-Mar-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | competitive-advantage-cons |
View: | 221 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Brand &
The Cow
Brand strategy: a b2b guide
First published in Great Britain in 2007
CASYSTEMS 1 Chase Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT19 8TL
© CASYSTEMS 2007
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system or transmitted in anyway, or by any means,
electronic, reclaimed, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the
prior written permission of the copyright holder.
A number of brand names, trademarks, and service marks are
mentioned in this book. Their inclusion in this book is for purposes of
illustration, criticism, and analysis only.
The right of Andrew Graham to be identified as author
of this work has been asserted in accordance with the copyright,
designs and patents act 1998.
A CIP catalogue record for this book is available
from the British Library
ISBN 978�0�9555482�0�8
contents:
what is a brand?
why brand?
1 Understand brand strategy 8
1 In life it pays to read the signs 10
1 Brands make value visible 11
1 Invest in brand strategy 18
how to make a brand?
1 Choose a brand name 22
1 What’s in a name 23
1 Sponsored 25
1 Authentic 27
1 Appropriated 29
1 Invented 31
1 Acronym 33
1 Choose a brand colour 35
1 Choose a brand symbol 39
1 Choose a brand typeface 42
1 In summary 45
what do you brand?
1 Brand the tangible 47
1 Brand the intangible 50
1 Brand the customer’s context 53
1 Brand the vision, promise and ‘big idea’ 56
1 Brand the values and the way 58
1 Brand the business reputation 63
where do you brand?
1 Context provides relevance 65
when to review your brand?
1 Brand strategy for new company or product 68
1 Brand strategy for brand extension 69
1 Brand strategy for market positioning 69
1 Brand strategy for new leadership and ownership 73
how to control your brand?
1 House of brands or branded house 78
1 The rules and the players 79
5
what is a brand?
“…a brand is a mark
of ownership.”
6
To understand branding in a business context it is useful to use
the Wild West and cattle ranching as the metaphor. In Texas there
are 250,000 registered ‘brands’ and in Texas, as in business, a brand
is a mark ownership – i.e. this cow comes from the ‘Double Bar’
ranch and has these qualities and that one comes from the ‘Triple X’
ranch and has those qualities etc. The distinguishing differences
made visible by the different brands. So, the concept of a brand
strategy is a simple one:
• establish the market context (cattle ranching)
• choose and design your brand (double bar)
• then decide on the things (‘the cows’) 0 you wish to brand.
The aim is to make your ownership visible: the physical things,
and the conceptual things like ideas, values and even music, textures,
and smells too (car manufacturers and supermarkets both brand
smells and scents in order to add differentiation).
To keep things simple it is useful to keep the definition of ‘brand’
as the mark itself and separate from the things that we place the
brand on – the ‘cows.’ This allows us to make our choices and
adjustment to the brand and what we brand independent. This gives
us the greatest degree of flexibility and control. These are the choices
that define your brand strategy.
The difficulty in business is the fact that often we often have
many contexts, different levels of ownership and numerous tangible
and intangible things to brand. The aim is to use brand strategy to
provide clarity and whilst this concept of brand strategy is simple, it
doesn’t make it easy to do well.
7
why brand?
be one of the gang
declare ownership
deceive a predator
get recognised
attract a mate
be visible
8
understanding brand strategy
Intuitively, we are all experts in brand strategy. We all use brand
strategies everyday, to make ourselves visible, to define who we are,
to make our allegiances clear, choose what we eat, where we are
seen and how we dress. Branding is so superficial and yet at the
same time emotionally so deep.
Branding draws together the things we identify with. This defines
our differences as a community or business – one of the most
compelling images of the Twin Towers attack was a picture of a
Coke truck flattened in the ruins. This image was representative of
both the physical attack and the attack on the essence of the US
identity itself by association with this iconic brand.
Brand England is so different to brand Français and yet in
biological and scientific terms we are the same species. Until the
alien invasion, it is our brand rather than our species that we defend.
Homosapiens are in truth very much like one another. It is our brand
that pulls us together into groups and communities and it is our brand
that concocts the difference between them.
In b2b sectors the brand default position seems to be a natural
tendency to identify with the characteristics of our sector; perhaps
due to a primeval urge to gather into tribes. But in doing so, we are
no longer unique in the eyes of the customer. We become an
invisible part of a homogenous group.
Complete sectors align themselves with each other and end up
sharing a similar brand language, behaviour, artefacts etc. While this
perhaps gives an individual business the comfort of being part of a
9
group, it is the wrong group! And so this is a false comfort.
In order to achieve differentiation, clearly we have to look and
sound different to our competitors. So where then should we look for
the right cues to follow?
If you brand your customers’ characteristics at an emotional,
subconscious level they are more likely to feel that you have some
understanding of their lives and contexts. In the search for a
company that best suits their needs, the one that already looks and
feels like “one of us” is surely at an advantage from the start. In the
effort to achieve this alignment with our customers we should
examine everything about them 0 rational and emotional, profound
and superficial 0 and brand ourselves to be attractive to them by
exhibiting outward signs, behaviour and understanding that connects
with their particular situation. This helps nurture a relationship of
reciprocity and mutual understanding.
To truly differentiate, we must ACTIVELY seek out and choose
DIFFERENT things from others we compete with in our sector to
define us – different values, signs, artefacts, language, behaviour,
dress, personality – and brand them. This is a golden rule of brand
differentiation.
In our everyday lives, we search out the things that will enhance
and differentiate our brand. In our business lives too, it is through
focussing on the depth, complexity and multiplicity of our brand in
all its facets both superficial and deep that we can give real value to
our brand.
Brand strategy is not only relevant in a consumer context. It can
10
bring competitive advantage to b2b companies and increase their
value too.
There are volumes written on brand strategy 0 worthy tomes all 0
but too many perpetrate the myth that it is a black art to be
administered only by the brand magicians! This is not so.
Brand experts can sometimes get tangled up and we think it is
time to redress the balance and give branding back to you, the brand
leader or owner and in the process we hope to make a stand for
simplicity and common sense.
in life: it pays to read the signs
Branding isn’t unique to us humans. Branding is a natural
phenomenon. Nature knows the power of branding using signs to
communicate between members of the same and different species the
common language of sex, danger, deception and attraction. Nature
uses signs to convey messages that say “stay close, leave alone…”
We believe that this natural process is at the centre of even the most
complicated business brand strategy.
Nature is a cornucopia of signs – safe, dangerous, edible,
poisonous, come closer, stay away – the white tail of a rabbit to
distract the hawk or fox, the yellow and black of the wasp warning of
danger. Understanding signs is part of the natural world. It is not
something we humans invented. It is arrogance to think otherwise.
Signs and therefore brands provide a shortcut to recognition and
understanding, speedily accessing memory and experience aiding our
11
very survival.
In business, it is advisable not to overcomplicate the concept of
branding 0 reading and making brands comes naturally to us all. We
benefit greatly if we become conscious of their value and power.
When we use nature as our guide, it makes the ambitions of the
politically naïve, who wish to lobby for a brand0less world, seem a
denial of the very essence of our existence. If we are in business we
believe we deny the power of brands at our peril. If we embrace this
power we grow and protect our assets both today and in the future.
brands make value visible
In nature the making and reading of signs is a matter of life and
death, so it is surprising that we spend so little time valuing this in
our b2b life.
It is better to embrace brands as part of our business ‘natural
history,’ where to stand out would appear to be the overwhelming
strategy, although by no means the only one. As in nature, we
sometimes turn the duplicity of the chameleon to our advantage, or
use signs of bigger animals to become something that we are not,
like the eyespots on the wings of a moth. Too often small companies
inadvertently communicate their smallness through their brand, when
in fact they can use signs to their advantage to convey an image
many times their actual size. All of these natural strategies are
available to us as brand strategies for our business too. We need to
make an informed choice, whether we wish to stand out or be part of
12
the crowd. Often in b2b our brands blend in, when really they need
to stand out or vice versa.
In business terms we are not making danger or sexual attraction
visible but we are making things like ownership, performance and
customer promises visible.
A word of caution here. It is a fact that visibility is a double0
edged sword. Visibility makes you more accountable to customers.
We have always felt that the Scout Movement is a great branding
model:
• they have the promise 0 to do their best; to do their duty to God
and the Queen; to help other people everyday
• the law 0 that guarantees the promises are met
• the signs 0 three fingered salute; symbols; woggle and cool
badges to collect.
The best brands work in this way. They contract their value to the
customer in ‘the law’ of the brand. If the brand breaks their law, then
the customer contract is void and the relationship is broken.
I recently heard a story about a Scout Akela who ‘dinked’ a
parked car in a supermarket car park and made the scouts in the car
with her deny it ever happened.
Oooops. In trying to conceal her guilt, her lie escalated and she
ended up with a suspended prison sentence and fine for perverting
the course of justice.
Not only did she break the law, but she broke The Scout Law.
This instigated a far more painful punishment for her than a mere
13
fine 0 ignominious expulsion from the Scout Movement. For
breaking their law total rejection was the only option.
14
“…branding
benefits
the brave!”
15
If you play the brand game, you must make promises that you
intend to keep. When brands break their promises, like the
unfortunate Akela, they are rejected.
A brand shows the customer where to go when all goes wrong, as
much as whom to praise when all goes right. Consumer companies
are willing to trade this perceived risk for the rewards in increased
margin and profitability that come with a well0executed brand
strategy. Far from being airy0fairy or fluffy, adopting a highly visible
brand strategy is not for the fainthearted. On the contrary, branding
benefits the brave!
B2b companies struggle to value this visibility and can’t equate
their small market to consumer markets where brand visibility is
essential to success. The audience may be smaller, but the need for
visibility is no less significant. The aim of b2b brand strategy is to be
visible in the particular business context. It is true these companies
do not need the visibility of Nike or Coke, but in their community
visibility remains a key differentiator and competitive advantage.
The more visible your company the more likely you are to be front
of mind – in preference to your competitor.
The boundaries of the desired visibility are very specific in b2b
and defined by their sector alone and not the general consumer
population. So when looking for examples of successful b2b brands
it is often difficult to see their value, as they do not resonate with the
market you understand and you do not know why, or what they are
branding, or valuable for. This should not be used as an excuse for
denying the effectiveness of brand strategy out of hand.
16
value:
a technology start0up
that invests in a brand
strategy increases its
value 10 fold (true story)
17
18
invest in brand strategy
“I do not know of any valuable b2b brands” does not mean we
can draw the conclusion that “therefore brand strategy is of little
importance or use to a b2b company.” Quite the opposite is true:
because branding is seen functionally rather than strategically in b2b
it makes the rewards from brand strategies much greater for those
that are prepared to invest and adopt them.
The value of investing in brand strategy in a b2b arena is twofold.
Firstly, a consistent brand strategy increases visibility and visibility
leads to favourability – if your brand is seen more than others then
you are more likely to be ‘front of mind’ and receive preference from
your audience
Secondly, a thought through brand strategy makes differentiation
visible by branding both the tangible (products, services, assets,
innovations, people, etc) and the intangible (ideas, values, concepts,
conversations, etc)
The ultimate test of a brand strategy is reflected in the price
customers are prepared to pay for their preferred brand. In consumer
terms this can be as much as double the price of the own label or the
generic product. Whilst the increased margin might not be so
obvious in b2b, there are all the other benefits of investing in a brand
strategy e.g. increased market share, stronger relationships and
ultimately increased shareholder value. B2b boardrooms are still
sceptical of the ‘brand effect’ in their context. Paradoxically this
gives great advantage to those that do invest. A brand strategy will
increase and protect competitiveness, reduce wasted effort and
19
duplication and make best use of resources.
We were once doing some research for a specialist precision
engineering oil brand. When we interviewed a distributor he told us a
story of a machine tool, cutting bit that was made by one
manufacturer and sold under four different brand names. Machine
engineers, a rational breed by all accounts, would swear that one bit
out performed the other two and paid a premium price for it. There
was no rational or analytical basis for their buying preference. It was
a matter of belief in the brand only.
20
“…a well executed
brand strategy can
increase margin in
even the most
rational of
business to business
sectors.”
21
how to make
a brand?
sponsored 0 Kelloggs
authentic 0 Post0it
invented 0 Accenture
acronym 0 BMW
appropriated 0 Virgin
22
The brand mark is made up of four distinct elements: �
the name, the colour, the typeface and the symbol (if you have one).
It is the combination of these elements applied consistently over
time that leads to visibility and brand recognition.
choose a brand name
Brand names are usually single words or acronyms. The name
needs to be short and phonetic in many languages with no obvious
negative associations (different words can be problematic in different
languages like the Vauxhall Nova, which means ‘no go’ in
Spanish!).
Business to business companies are sometimes tempted to use the
complete company name as their brand. This does not increase
visibility and recognition. It hinders it. A brand name must function
physically, it must be visible and it must stand out. In a ranching
context, the brand itself is burnt into the rump of the animal. This is
enough to declare ownership. B2b companies often want to do the
equivalent of brand the whole flank of the animal! They often end up
shouting their ownership at their customers and believe more is more
when we all know the maxim that less is so and in branding terms as
a rule this definitely is the case.
Often the first task is to shorten the company name to create the
brand name. Definitely take off the description of the company and
its limited or plc status – the company name is rarely the brand. At
the beginning of our b2b journey when we won a pitch we were told
23
that we could do anything we like with the marketing but “… you
cannot change the name…” and this was the first thing we
recommended and did! To be recognised you need to be seen and
remembered. Brand strategy is often a tool of seduction rather than
domination!
The shorter the word the bigger the cap0height and the more the
brand stands0out. It’s as simple as that. Less is definitely more.
a) SENSOR HYWAY LIMITED
b) Sensa
Which business was more visible, was it ‘a’ or ’b’?
‘b’ 0 This was the same company with a different brand.
One of the most attractive things to human beings is intrigue – It
is what you leave out that is often more interesting then what you put
in.
what’s in a name?
For all the different brand names in the world there are
essentially five different types 0 sponsored, authentic, invented,
acronym, appropriated.
24
These definitions are not rigorous. Boundaries blur and there are
numerous hybrid examples like IKEA which is a sponsored brand
(after the founder: Ingvar Kampard; Village and farm name
Elmtaryd & Agunnaryd) reduced to an acronym and which looks like
it is an invented name! However, these distinctions serve to access a
route that is acceptable to you and your board.
The name itself is only one part of the brand and any of the five
routes is equally represented by highly successful or unsuccessful
brand examples. It is not the brand name that defines success or
failure. It is the value of the business or product itself. To blame the
brand is to scapegoat it.
It is most important that the brand functions, is protectable as a
trademark and does not have problematic associations. Often these
criteria are more important than the choice of the brand name itself.
Brand naming is often an emotive subject, so it is advisable to take a
pragmatic approach when choosing one.
25
sponsored
The most common sponsored brand name is a derivative of the
founder’s name itself: Cadbury, Dunlop, Kellogg’s, Dyson, Hewlett
Packard, Ford, and Hutchinson, all use the name of the founder to
add legitimacy, provenance and accountability. The individual who
sponsors the product with their name is the guarantee. It shows that
they personally believe in the product they are endorsing. Their
integrity is made visible through the brand name.
At the turn of the century, before affective trading standards,
many products were often adulterated. At Cadbury World in
Bournville there is an exhibit that explained how the Cadbury brand
guaranteed quality at a time when many chocolate powders were
adulterated with brick dust!
Note. The founder often remains integral to brands even when the
brand does not take the founder’s name, e.g. Branson and Virgin,
Gates and Microsoft, Jobs and Apple, Roddick and Bodyshop –
every self respecting brand should have one! The founder’s name
adds reassurance and legitimacy. Brand marketers know this and
have used this strategy to invent names that have no relationship to
the actual founders’ names at all, such as Haagen0Dazs and Crabtree
& Evelyn.
26
Dyson
Cadbury
Kellogg’s
Hewlett Packard
Ford
Dunlop
27
authentic
These brands rely on their genuineness and authenticity. The
brand name encapsulates exactly what the product is. Referencing
the features and functionality of the product itself is another effective
way to come up with a brand. In this way the brand declares
ownership of the authentic product features, denying those features
to their competitors. This relies on first mover advantage – Dyson’s
Dual Cyclone technology brand prohibits others from using the name
and therefore takes the authentic position. The competition
technology is always going to be the follower.
Maintaining TM protection for this type of brand name can prove
more challenging if the name itself is also a generic term. The
founder of ‘So Organic’ was recently up in arms with Sainsbury’s
over their use of this name. It will be interesting to see how she fares
when taking on the 800 pound corporate gorilla. Bit of a warning
here. If you are the small guy it is difficult to protect a name that is
in the vernacular, particularly when your competitor has deeper legal
pockets. Frustration and anger does not change your ability to protect
your brand name. However, many brands have successfully achieved
authenticity and TM protection through creative juxtaposition – Post
It, Dual Cyclone, Easyjet, etc. This is a common b2b branding
solution for both products and companies. In the 1950’s NASA was
looking for water dispersant to prevent corrosion on rockets that
were exposed to desert air or cold weather. They were looking for a
fine oil to avoid condensation freezing and adversely affecting the
28
rocket launch. Water Dispersant 40 (the 40th prototype) was the
answer – better known to you and me as WD40.
29
appropriated
This is another route. All brands are symbolic in some way but
these are more so. These brand names take ownership of a word that
somehow encapsulates the mood and values of the brand –
• Orange 0 optimism
• Nike 0 victory
• Egg 0 security
• Polo 0 sporting
These brands take ownership of the associated and symbolic
values that they represent. Nike is the goddess of victory in Greek
mythology. An image of the goddess was on every medal at the
Sydney Olympics – not a bad piece of appropriation by Nike the
shoe brand! Often these brands tap into a customer zeitgeist
somehow connecting at a deeper subconscious level than their
competitors. A brave approach sometimes used to position a new
brand in a new context like ‘Egg’ in internet banking. It is not
common for b2b companies to take this overly emotional approach,
but it could be highly effective if someone was brave enough to try!
30
31
invented
These brand names begin their life with no intrinsic ownership of
provenance, concept, value, feature or benefit. All these associations
have to be made after the birth of the brand. Remembering these
brands is therefore an issue particularly in the early days.
Often this is the preferred solution in markets which are crowded
and where trademark protection is key. Pharmaceuticals and cars are
two such markets. There has also been a corporate fashion for made
up brand names too. Some of these brands have been more
successful than others. Accenture being recognised as a success, the
Consignia name a resounding failure.
The problem with these brands is that they can at first appear
hollow, empty and meaningless – which they are. There are no
collective associations or reference points for these brands and
unless this is assimilated quickly they can flounder.
Sometimes when there is a large corporate merger, acquisition, or
disposal, inventing a new name seems the best way to go, as there
are no founders or geographies to declare ownership of. Features are
unspecific and appropriating a name would seem a step too far. So
the sensible option is to make something up, achieve TM protection
and dot.com status and create visibility from day one. These benefits
outweigh any take0up challenges for many.
32
Accenture
Consignia
Lenovo
Viagra
Cyalis
33
acronym
This is an extremely common branding solution. It is part of the
natural process of refinement associated with established brands.
Over time it requires less and less of the original name in order to
make the mental connection in the viewer – the trigger becomes
refined to the acronym or the colour or the symbol alone. Often
customers forget what the acronym stands for and they no longer
need to know the name in order to recognise the brand.
It is the ultimate accolade of a successful brand strategy when a
smallest reference point triggers recognition. This makes these
brands highly competitive based on awareness and recall alone. All
brands should aspire to this reduction and should actively encourage
it. In brand development terms this is an indication of strength, not
weakness – less is more. All b2b brands should aspire to refinement
from the beginning. The reduction of your brand name is part of the
brand’s growth.
This group of brand names can have its roots in any of the
previous name segments:
34
Ingvar Kampard Elmtaryd Agunnaryd
Bayerische Motoren Werke
International Business Machines
British Broadcasting Corporation
International Chemical Industries
Dual Cyclone
35
choose a brand colour
Choosing colours is a natural process i.e. we look to nature for
the values of colour:
• Sunshine warmth, vibrancy yellow
• Life0blood energy, aggression red
• Sea & sky constancy, trust blue
• Earth natural caring green/brown
• Night mystery depth black
• Light clarity, purity, white
• Rare metals precious, special gold/silver
Colours can be chosen to reinforce your values. For example, the
optimism of ‘orange’ and the trust of Amex and IBM ‘blues’ and the
environmental concern of Bodyshop ‘green.’
Different cultures have different meanings for colours. In the
west red is the colour of energy and aggression, (the red of Ferrari or
the Manchester United ‘red devils’). In China it represents good luck
on birthdays and at New Year. On a physiological and psychological
level red stimulates the brain more than other colours. Maybe it is
not surprising then that the teams wearing red football kits have won
the European cup a disproportionate number of times. Many, many
successful brands use red as their colour: HSBC, Coca Cola,
Chevron, Vodaphone, 3M, Ferrari to name a few.
To have red as part of your brand brings energy to it. Not only
36
brands, but also many countries use red to communicate their energy
and the blood of conquest and revolution. This is an aside, but if
creating a new brand in a new country it is a good idea to check to
see if you can leverage the national colours for your brand – another
kind of appropriation.
The most common colour for a corporate identity is blue, the
colour of constancy. You know where you are with blue and it’s a
colour you can trust. ICI, BMW, BA and Unilever are good ‘blue’
companies. These solid ‘blue0chips’ are the equities we can always
trust to deliver.
The greens and browns are colours of nature and increasingly
common in an environmentally aware and organic world. Brands like
Bodyshop, Waitrose and bp use green very effectively. Arguably the
M&S colours support their food offer well too. Green and brown
says organic.
Yellow is almost too vibrant to be often used as the primary
brand colour. The notable exception is in the contracting machinery
sector where to stand out is not only communicating high energy, but
is safer too. CAT and JCB are two brands that come to mind using a
predominance of yellow. Yellow is often used as a secondary colour
to add an accent of zing. Yellow is uplifting.
Mystery, depth and the aesthetic are communicated with black. It
is often used by premium consumer brands such as jewellery,
watches, perfume, etc. These brands are intriguing because of their
absence of colour – Sony, Nike, Orange, and NatWest all use the
depth of black for their brand. Black communicates premium in b2b
37
too and is an underused colour in the b2b colour palette.
White is the leader of the colour pack. When it snows the colours
of our world are obfuscated and all colours of the rainbow are
contained within white light. White is the colour of purity,
simplicity, calm and spirituality. From the white robes of the Celtic
druid, to the white coat of the medical surgeon and dog collar of a
priest, white commands attention. It is no surprise that white is a
common colour in the corporate palette, particularly in
pharmaceutical and medical sectors.
There is something about gleaming metals that appeals to our
shared consciousness. For millennia, pure metal must have been
exceedingly rare, desirable and valued both as jewellery and
weapons. It is not surprising that these colours appeal to us deeply.
These metals often had highly cultural meanings and were revered.
Therefore, silver and gold are colours of premium and status.
Silver is often used in technology and car sectors. Silver can be
quite a masculine colour.
Gold on the other hand is more alluring, more feminine (more
expensive!). Gold is often used on premium consumer brands from
beers to chocolates 0 the gold top, gold crest, etc. Tescos uses gold
on its Finest brand. The ultimate premium colour selection is a
combination of gold, black, white and red.
Communication is not limited to the colour itself. We can also
choose tones and shades too. Deep colours denote premium value.
Bright colours appeal to children and are used by budget brands.
Pastel colours are softer and more feminine.
38
We have so many colour combinations to choose from. Using
colour we can choose to stand together or we can choose to stand
apart from our customers and competitors. Your choice of colours is
a considered one and is a fun thing to do. Ultimately, after years of
consistent application, the sight of the colour alone in a given context
can represent the brand.
• Soft drink red Coke
• Mobile telephones orange Orange
• Computers blue IBM
• Petrol green bp
A word of caution. Obviously the more colours you choose to be
part of your brand the more expensive it is to maintain consistency
and reproduce the brand when applying it to things. It is wise to
choose a primary colour, accent colour and complementary palette.
Many highly successful brands just use black or a single colour in
their mark and allow additional colours to come from the things that
they choose to brand. This is part of the confidence that comes when
a brand is established and reduced. The BBC is a great example of a
brand that moved from the multiple colours of broadcasting in their
brand, to the simplicity and quality of just black and white. Sony is
another quality brand that just uses black in the brand.
39
choose a brand symbol
Not every brand needs the additional symbol. Often the name,
typography or the colours alone are symbolic enough. But sometimes
a symbol can really add to the visibility of a brand. Nature exhibits a
natural symbolism, read by animals at a subconscious level. In nature
signs mean things 0 when to mate, whom to mate with, what to eat,
where to find food, who are your friends and who to avoid in the
forest. It seems only natural for human beings to take this to the
conscious level and to adopt these natural symbols to mean cultural
things to themselves and others 0 friend or enemy, freeman or slave,
priest or farmer, trendy, boring. In society everything is symbolised
as it is in nature.
In Texas recently we noticed the symbols on a number plate and
we were struck how the Texas brand reinforces its identity through
the appropriation of signs. We had a debate concerning the state’s
existence – one side of the argument was that the state only really
exists because of the definition it is given by the signs – the cowboy
– the moon – the space shuttle – oil wells and its chosen uber sign –
the lone star (chosen to represent the fight for independence from
Mexico and then as a symbol of the Texan republic), which all
appear on this number plate. Take the signs away and the brand of
Texas is diminished. The signs define the conceptual boundaries of
the state.
The counter argument claims that without the signs the state still
exists 0 the people – the land – the boundaries.
It is possible to harmonize these two positions. In physical terms
40
the state physically exists but psychologically if we have no signs we
have no orientation to say whether we are emotionally in the state or
somewhere else – anywhere else.
We need to appropriate the signs of our environment to help us to
identify with our group. Signs and their symbolism help us to stand
together or stand apart.
If you desire to choose a symbol for your brand then it helps if
you know your deepest values so you can mirror them with
something from your world 0 either natural or man made 0 that share
these values. This creates a powerful connection with the members
of the group who share the knowledge of the sign and what it
symbolises.
All societies appropriate items from their surroundings and make
them symbolic to their own group. In nature these symbols are
intrinsic to different species. In humans we create this species0like
differentiation by codifying things for our ‘tribe.’ Almost anything
can be made symbolic. Take the symbol used by the Rolling Stones
based on Mick Jagger’s lips!
Over the millennia human beings acquired the ability to adopt,
adapt and manipulate symbols mirroring the natural world. For all
the complexity of our human societies, paradoxically it is often the
natural world that becomes symbolic in them.
Often it is the things that are closest to us whose significance we
understand intuitively that the group chooses to make symbolic 0 the
stars of the US flag, the cedar tree of Lebanon, the Southern Cross of
Australia. It is as if their natural boundaries mirror our own0shared
41
consciousness – events, nature, geography, race and environment.
All are acquired and made symbolic of the group that we belong too.
Symbols range from:
• the super valued symbols of culture and religious faith
• the symbols of politics (the ‘elephant’ of the republicans and
the ‘rose’ of New Labour)
• the symbols of business (the bull and the bear of the stock
exchange, the Nike tick. It’s worth noting here that the symbol
is next to valueless until it is imbued with meaning and shared
memory. The designer who came up with the Nike tic design
was a student Carolyn Davidson who was paid $35.
Interesting to speculate how much this symbol is worth now?)
• the prosaic symbols of the football club mascot (the Chicago
Bears, the Manchester United red devils, etc)
This symbol was synonymous with CND in the 50’s and 60’s and
with the peace movement in the US during the Vietnam War. With
all our current anxieties 0 the threat of nuclear terrorism, nuclear
proliferation, Iran, Trident and the revisiting of the nuclear energy
programme in the UK 0 it is set for a refresh.
42
The combination of the rational and the emotional are striking
within the symbol. The sign combines the semaphore symbols for
N(uclear) and D(isarmament) and the impeaching figure with open
arms imploring, ‘why?’
Symbols are made more powerful by their simplicity. The orange
square of orange, the candle and barbed wire of Amnesty
International, the poppy of Armistice Day, the maple leaf of Canada,
the propeller of BMW, the Helios of bp (this is a cautionary tale, as I
heard the other day that Friends of the Earth have appropriated the
bp Helios and represented it as the burning planet!). These symbols
connect us with the point, the purpose and the relevance.
Many brands do perfectly well without a symbol and if you are
going to choose to have one, make it simple, make it intuitive, make
it reflect the moment and make sure it is easily applied. And another
thing 0 make sure everyone can see it. As a matter of interest the
Peace symbol has no copyright and we can all use it.
choose brand typefaces
Another key component of your brand is the typeface. When
choosing a typeface there are some fundamental decisions to be
made 0 is it to be serif, sans serif, script, condensed, bold, light,
extended, italic, capitals, lower case, etc. There are literally
thousands of combinations to choose from and these choices say
something about your brand. Type is encoded with meaning not
unlike colour.
43
Type can indicate the brands nationality, cultural roots and
historical period.
Often type is used by consumer brands to reinforce provenance
either perceived or real. The Perrier logotype is so – ‘je ne c’est
quoi?’ – French. The traditional type face of Crabtree & Evelyn
communicates a quintessential Englishness, when in fact it is an
American creation. Type is fashionable and defines and resonates
with different periods – art deco; World War II; the swinging sixties.
Pizza Express still retains that flower power look. Type tells the
viewer so much. Type helps to position the brand in the sector. A
typeface can be used to align your brand to a sector or stand out from
the crowd, e.g. Virgin’s use of the scripted ‘V’ visually reinforces the
brand’s differentiation from the traditional corporation. Similarly a
typeface can be adopted to signify belonging. In this case being
different is not an advantage. For example, all US sports teams are
signified by their use of bold slab serif faces. The pharmaceutical
and technology sectors have similar preferences for clean, modern
styles. It would seem inevitable that Dyson chose a sans serif face to
position their reputation for technological innovation, design and
performance. These choices are part of developing your brand
strategy and quickly connect you with the values of your customers.
Often it pays to make your logotype unique to reinforce
differentiation, your sense of ownership and aid registration and
trademark protection.
44
Warm
TOUGH
intellectual
modern
old fashioned
45
in summary:
c + a = vf α value
It is the consistency (c) and application (a) of the brand elements over time (t) that delivers visibility (v) and
favourability (f). Visibility and favourability is proportionate to value (v).
t
46
what do you brand?
“…first impressions are memorable, use the brand
to make them so.”
47
brand the tangible
Earlier we defined the difference between ‘the brand’ and ‘the
cows.’ The ‘cows’ are split into two groups the tangible and the
intangible and we wish to create visibility and reinforce
differentiation by branding both.
Visibility in context is essential. As a rule of brand if customers
can’t see you, they can’t find you! If you are not seen consistently
the customer gets confused.
The jury is out on a leading budget airline and car hire company
in our family. The airline – douze points (plane on time, plane brand
new, pilot competent – staff friendly and efficient…it’s all you need)
Car hire from the same company 0 nil points (brand invisible at Pisa
airport, no signs, no guidance, no staff…!) The car hire franchise had
been given to a local car company. This lack of brand visibility
meant we had to work it all out for ourselves, contributing to overall
negative brand perceptions for both parts of their business – negative
brand perception in one area affects the positive brand reputation in
another.
If you desire to stand out, the first task is to choose the tangible /
physical objects of your business that you intend to brand and make
your ownership of them visible.
First you need to audit all internal and external, tangible branding
opportunities:
• buildings
• products
• receptions & meeting rooms
48
• offices
• vehicles
• communications
• literature
• people
• websites
• stationery, etc.
If our aim is to be visible then the brand must be discreetly or
blatantly present on everything. Look at your building, your car park,
your people and particularly your reception area. Does your brand
surround your customer and embrace them in a differentiated
experience? If your brand environment is uninspiring or the same as
others then you are selling yourself short, keeping your value hidden,
not visible. You do not stand out. Your own physical environment is
not the only place to make your brand visible.
49
I came across this great piece of branding whilst I was waiting for
the 7am Intercity from Swindon to Paddington. The Hornby brand
has had resurgence in recent years and with brand placement like this
it is hardly surprising! What a catch for all the baby boomer dads as
they trudge to work. Any excuse to buy that train set the second time
around.
Make the brand visible on partners’ products too if you can and
if it is relevant. (I was recently in a Hamley’s toyshop and saw that
the staff sweatshirts were dual branded with Hamley’s and Ever
Ready, making the relevant association between toys and long life
batteries).
Finding additional tangible branding opportunities is a creative
challenge. Using sponsorship and events is a common way of
tangibly extending brand visibility – the opportunity is to find
relevant connections between your customer, your product and the
chosen branding opportunity. Consumer companies have done this
for years – Marlboro branding motor racing and snooker, Land
Rover sponsoring horse trials.
B2b companies use industry events, golf days, rugby and football
matches for relationship building but sometimes do not maximise the
brand visibility. If the brand is as visible as possible it is more likely
that the investment in the event will be much longer lasting than the
day itself as memories of the event will always be linked with your
brand.
It is also desirable to brand physical items that customers will
take into other areas of their life. It is possible to get your brand into
50
their office, or even into their home. Seeing the trigger will stimulate
a continuous reminder of the brand. This is the physical side of
branding. This is the brand that we can see in the world.
The ultimate branding coup must surely be Coca Cola’s branding
of Father Christmas in the 1940’s and 50’s which was symptomatic
of the increasing commercialisation of Christmas for the consumer
age.
brand the intangible
To be competitive we must brand more than the tangible things
we own. When branding the intangible the aim is to get inside the
customers’ heads. If possible, we wish to brand their subconscious.
51
This means branding the customers’ fears, desires, memories and
beliefs, whereupon the brand becomes the trigger for their recall.
For the duration of England’s World Cup campaign Mars literally
replaced its brand with the England supporters’ psyche. I can only
BELIEVE that this campaign was an inspired success for Mars,
sadly not for England though – Ronaldo put a stop to that!
It is desirable to brand the things we cannot see – the things that
exist in the mind of the customer. We heard a funny story at a
seminar recently. We were discussing the justifications for the
elevated price point of Heinz beans over their own0label rivals, and
as usual the 'Heinz beans tastes better' brigade was winning. Then
one of the delegates, who up until then had been quiet all morning,
piped up with an amusing story of his personal brand deception.
Some years earlier his girlfriend had bought home 'stripey
Tesco value’ beans in the weekly shopping. Seeing them was
an affront to his status and sensibilities, so he made it clear
that "...there would only be Heinz beans in his kitchen
cupboard!"
Subsequently, he was pleased to see that his instructions
had been carried out to the letter and for the next couple of
years he was pleasantly reassured every time he opened the
kitchen cupboard to see his precious Heinz beans proudly
standing to attention on the shelf. Unbeknown to him his
girlfriend had been buying Tesco’s value beans for ages and
hiding them at the back of the cupboard. He had been eating
the Tesco's brand beans for years. Being deceived by what he
52
saw in the cupboard he was convinced that the beans on his
plate were his beloved Heinz. The emotional reassurance
provided by the sight of the brand was enough to modify the
perceived taste of the beans. In truth they weren't Heinz, they
were inferior and he fooled himself every time he ate them.
I think this goes to prove that when we buy Heinz we are
buying into much more than taste alone. We are paying for
other emotional reassurances as well and we justify and
rationalise this as taste. To do otherwise would be admitting
our irrational judgement.
Filling up with petrol recently I noticed that Esso has
developed a fuel brand called ‘Energy.’ This is a perfect
example of branding the intangible benefit as well as the
tangible product. As a car driving customer, of course we don’t
value petrol, we value ‘energy’. In b2b terms how often do we
promote the product rather than the customer benefit? Too
often. It feels counter intuitive to promote the customer’s need
0 the desire for energy 0 rather than the business aim to sell us
petrol. This Esso branding reminds the driver of the intangible
value of the fuel every time they fill up the car. This is timely,
with fuel prices at the pump nudging a pound a litre. Two
years ago we had fuel riots and blockades over the price of
petrol, at this time we are more resigned to the value of energy
it seems. And the uncertain future of energy is packed with
emotional content
When bp first ran their ‘beyond petroleum’ campaign, they were
53
ridiculed. Being first with the idea has resulted in them emerging as
the leader of the pack. No one is making fun now, as their profits rise
exponentially. On the one hand, oil is a finite resource and will
eventually run out. On the other hand, our need for energy never
will. We can take some heart from the fact that oil companies are
rebranding as energy companies and reinvesting some of their profits
in our future need for energy, not petrol. Let us hope this sign from
Esso is more than just a cynical marketing ploy and is part of a
broader understanding of our future needs. Your brand being top of
the customers’ mind should be your goal. Being remembered first is
a great advantage as it is very difficult for a competitor to usurp your
brand from the customer's mind if it is your brand that is associated
with the intangible thing first. This makes Volvo’s desire to change
their perceived value from safety to lifestyle an uphill challenge for
them.
Consumer brands have known this for years, and this is where
b2b brands can achieve outstanding results, because b2b companies
are locked into the tangibility of their fixed assets, products, and
services. Too often they do not spend the thinking time to evaluate
the intangible things that can be branded in the mind.
All companies, customers, people, products and services have
intangible attributes that can increase their value if made visible with
branding.
We desire to brand these intangible things.
54
brand the customers’ contexts
The first intangible we have an opportunity to brand is the
customer context itself. The customer context is the stimulus for the
customers’ anxieties and desires. Branding these things gets you and
the customer onto the same page.
B2b marketing can learn from its consumer cousins. Consumer
markets are by necessity much more focussed on the customer, not
the products, first. Consumer companies hold up a mirror to the
customer. The customers see themselves as if in a mirror and in this
image products and services are positioned. A recent television
advert by a well known washing powder promotes the idea that
getting dirty is a worthwhile consequence of the customer’s aim to
have fun, (play rugby, dig the garden, climb trees, etc) – this
represents the customer’s image and the customer’s desire. The
washing powder actually promotes getting dirty. This is counter
intuitive 0 promoting what is wrong doesn’t feel right. From the
product position, getting dirty is bad, being clean good!
Championing the customers desire to get dirty doing the things they
love gives this product an edge. B2b does not invest the time or
creativity to differentiate their understanding of the customer context
and is very rarely brave enough to promote the story from the
customer’s point of view. This is one of the reasons why b2b
marketing is often undistinguished and whole sectors
undistinguishable.
The fact that in consumer markets choice is almost infinite for
like products – cosmetics, mobile phones, cars, fashion,
Context & memory
55
confectionery, insurance 0 means that the context of the customer
often provides the only basis for differentiation and not the product
per se. For example one car is packaged to multiple customer groups.
The jaguar X type and the Ford Mondeo share the same chassis
platform. The Royal Bank Of Scotland packages insurance products
to different customer segments such as Directline, Privilege and
Churchill. The customer makes the difference not the product. At a
more ‘everyday’ level the publishers of Harry Potter have used the
customer to differentiate the story since the first book when the
children’s cover version was priced at £4.99 and the adult packaged
cover priced at £6.99. Not a single muggle difference and yet an
additional two pounds for the privilege.
In consumer marketing, differentiation is not defined by the
product. It is defined by the customer context. Our argument is that
this is increasingly the case in b2b too.
In the desire to ‘close’ the deal b2b companies too often go
straight to branding the product and miss out the customers’ story
completely. A consumer business would never do this as they realise
that to brand the customer context delivers greater levels of empathy
and rapport and ultimately value. This is branding the ‘open.’
Making the customer’s story visible and branding it is a highly
competitive opportunity that needs to be addressed with care and
attention. The customers’ context holds up a mirror to the customer
and provides the ‘WHY’ question. It is very advantageous to brand
them.
Orange has done a spectacular job of branding specific customer
56
contexts, taking relevant and different imagery from particular
customer groups and imbuing it with the black, white and orange
pallet of the brand. The quirky illustration of Dracula for 16 year
olds, the sponsorship of the Baftas for the 40 plus AB’s, orange
pinstripe suit for business customers. Orange gains by successfully
declaring a deep level of understanding to every customer segment.
The maxim here is ‘one brand many contexts’ rather than many
brands many contexts – that is unless you can support this multiple
brand strategy, like a Unilever or P&G does.
brand the vision, promise and the ‘big’ idea
If you can express what is wrong, you can position yourself to
make it right!’ This is the big idea at the centre of a leading brand
strategy.
Every company should have a promise that they can brand. The
promise represents the customer’s desire. A clear promise always
puts the customer first. The promise is attractive because it always
provides customers with a vision that distances their anxieties and
invites their desires. A promise affects people emotionally. A
promise gives the customer a vision of the future that they can
believe in. If the customer believes in the promise then the promise
maker achieves greater control.
A promise defines what you stand for. This is the “I have a
dream…” passion that drives successful companies.
Companies cannot be driven by the profit and loss alone – they
need to have the emotional fuel to improve something, put
57
something back and make the world a better place. Then they need to
brand it. Volvo has branded ‘safety’, Cat has branded ‘toughness’,
BMW brands ‘status’, Orange has branded ‘optimism.’ All these
promises are denied from the competition because these brands
branded them first – it is not only first to market, it is first to
mind too.
This is where a company needs to show leadership to its target
customer group. The best brands lead us by engaging actively with
the future. Leading companies literally brand the customers’ vision
for them.
We do not invest enough time in thinking – strategic thinking.
Too often we think only about how to act, not ‘why’ to act. Leaders
in the boardroom need to spend more time thinking beyond the
boundaries of their operational business to look at the market
environment and think about their responses to trends as they
emerge. It is not uncommon to find businesses that have a business
model that evolved in a previous time. That is out of step with the
current conditions – sometimes by years.
Ideas should not be preserved in aspic, revered but irrelevant.
Ideas need to move on.
Running out of ideas comes slightly before running out of
business road. Just ask Golden Wonder. Thinking is good corporate
governance; could Golden Wonder have thought their way out of
trouble? It’s too late, so we’ll never know.
Thinking about the future protects it.
58
Bp’s ‘beyond petroleum campaign’ has secured their position as
the most environmentally conscious oil company, or IBM’s ‘on
demand business campaign’ makes them the on0demand leader. Both
these ‘philosophies’ were introduced in opposition to the established
view of the day. ‘Beyond Petroleum’ was launched with the oilfield
in recession and oil at $20 a barrel and IBM launched the ‘e0business
on demand’ campaign at the height of the dot com crash. Brave. In
business it pays to have a counter intuitive idea that ‘zigs’ when the
competition ‘zags.’
Get in touch with your philosophical side – you know it makes
good business sense.
brand the values and the way
So many values to choose from when preparing a brand strategy
and yet so few b2b companies bother or make an effort to choose
unique values to brand. Not many b2b companies think about the
values that are really attractive to their customers. Surprising really
as these are the values that reinforce differentiation. Values are
derived from the promise. The values are the way to deliver what is
promised.
At the end of the day one latte is very like another isn’t it? – the
product is not the differentiator. Costa Coffee differentiates ‘the
way’ they make their coffee. Costa goes further to explain to
customers their particular values and behaviours. This is the Costa
59
way that defines the criteria on which the brand is judged.
• The Costa PASSION for coffee which means their beans
are roasted for 18 minutes compared to the competitors 7
or 8
• Costa coffee is AUTHENTIC Italian, a blend of 6 Arabica
beans to 1 Robusta
• Costa OWNS THE PROCESS from factory to store
These are the rules that make Costa Coffee the best!
Often in business our products are the same and it is only the way
that we conceptualise them that makes the difference. It is worth
making an effort to think about ‘your way’ so you can tell a story
that sets you apart. The product is the same (in this case coffee) but
the Costa way is different.
In consumer marketing this is a common ploy. B2b is missing a
trick with undifferentiated offerings all telling the same story. The
spoils go to the company that makes the effort to tell a customer
centric story that increases the customers’ desires and sets doubts in
their minds about the competitors.
Values should be used to set the criteria on which your
competitors are judged and set the criteria for all your competition.
In this way you can brand your strengths and expose the
competitors’ weaknesses.
Too often b2b companies often make a couple of fundamental
mistakes:
Firstly, they brainstorm a random list of disconnected values
that articulate their own rather than the customers’ values. They
60
may then feel good but these values will rarely engage the
customer.
Secondly, they choose the basic off the shelf values like quality,
service and innovation. Too often these are the old favourites. This
list no longer provides differentiation unless you are possibly Rolls
Royce, Claridges or 3M, when branding these values can still be
differentiating and defining. In b2b it pays to try harder.
These days the basic values are now the ‘get to game’ rather
than the ‘win the game.’ The company values we choose must be
meaningful and together with our customers we must be able to
believe in them. If we do then this will increase our relevance to
them and encourage engagement with the business.
When we make a stand for certain values they keep our attitudes
and behaviours on track. If we stray it becomes obvious. That’s
why the values must be thought through and meaningful. If they are
not then in the mind of the customer we appear just like every other
company in our sector.
Values are best expressed in threes and this makes them
memorable. For the Celts, three was a magic number. Three is a
powerful conceptual construct. In a geometrical sense the triangle is
the strongest shape and a stool can only stand when it has a
minimum of three legs. Three is an economical solution. A set of
three branded values is very memorable. Invest in the time to:
• explore the values you share with your customers;
• boil them down into a set of three that you are prepared to be
accountable for and measured by
61
• promote them consistently to your staff and customers
• use repeatedly to establish ownership to deny your
competitors the ability to claim them.
If you live by the values you brand you will increase your
differentiation and strengthen your competitive advantage. Words
of caution if you promote these values but do not live by them, then
you are breaking the promises to your customers. There is no doubt
and Branson has admitted that difficulties with Virgin rail, which
were largely beyond his control, have had a negative affect on the
brand in the UK. He has stuck stoically to the task to turn his
company and its performance around. But if you are the
‘consumers’ champion’ then this does not sit well with the fact that
Virgin trains are consistently late. A poor product will always
reduce the value of the brand that makes it visible.
62
faith, hope and charity
equality, fraternity,
liberty
God, queen and
country
third time lucky
63
brand the business reputation
Positive and negative brand perceptions operate a bit like a bank
account and memories and experiences are the currency on deposit.
When in credit your brand gains interest, when overdrawn expect
your customers to close your account. Your brand can cope with one
or two bad experiences and these events keep you sharp, as
imperfection has a purpose – it’s natural. However, treat your
reputation with disrespect and expect customers to leave in droves.
In the late eighties Gerald Ratner made the biggest marketing
gaffe of all time – whilst referring to a sherry decanter from one of
his stores at a dinner speech he told the collected business audience
that it was crap. When reported in the Sun the next day it sparked
one of the biggest corporate crashes of the yuppie era. Ratners had
just posted a profit of 110 million pounds and this comment stuck the
boot into the very customers that had fuelled the profits.
Not surprisingly the customers dropped the brand overnight. He
became a scapegoat for the masses. The papers had a field day.
Gerald was sent to corporate purgatory and the story became part of
marketing folk law. Customer trust takes years to earn and can be
lost in an instant.
There is a moral for us all here. Profit isn’t a corporate birthright
(FD’s please take note). The customer permits organisations to make
a profit. Upset the customer and that permission is quickly rescinded.
Beware customer abuse. Customers are amazingly patient, but they
are not stupid. Profit is the reward for giving the customer value. If
you mine their value rather than farm it, they will punish you.
64
where do you
brand?
“… every brand
competes against
other brands in
generic market
contexts.”
65
context provides relevance
Brands give customers signposts that help them to find what they
want to buy. In a context with competing products and services it is
the brand that communicates the difference.
The context provides boundaries for the customer to make their
brand assessments and choices. For example, when out shopping we
can choose brands in many contexts, and even within one market,
say ‘sports,’ there are many contexts and many brand choices:
Context: Brand:
Channel:
ebay
John Lewis
Runners’ World
Shoe manufacturer:
Nike
Asics
Puma
Product:
Nike Air Structure
Asics Gel
NB RX Terrain
66
So many brands, so many contexts and so many choices – it’s no
wonder brands need to be visible. Brands are positioned in every
context to aid customer choices on the purchasing journey either
outside in, from the channel to the product, or inside out from the
product to the channel.
67
when to review
your brand?
“…it is the quality of
the things you brand
that creates value.
The brand makes
this value visible.”
68
Reviewing the brand strategy should be a continuous task, but
there are times of particular focus. Principally there are three times to
consider the brand strategy –
• when introducing a new company, product, service
• when the market shifts and customers or competitors
change
• when there is new ownership or leadership
brand strategy for new company or product
Much of this book discusses the creation of a new brand – the
reasons why we do it; choosing name, colour and symbol and how,
where and when to apply it. Before we embark on the investment of
brand creation we must always ask ourselves, is our new product,
service or company worthy of the investment it takes to create a new
brand? Too often we are tempted to dive straight in and brief the
design and creative professionals. It pays to stop and think. A brand
is for life not just for Christmas. Sometimes we feel the need to
brand things when in fact we just need to market the current brand
better. This is particularly so when the parent is weakened by
acquisition, poor decisions or poor leadership. Sometimes it is better
to come up with a new product name rather than a brand. To get a
new brand launched is like launching a rocket into orbit. It takes a lot
of energy to escape gravity but without this impetus a new brand
may never fly.
If you do decide to launch something new remember to choose
69
strategically whether you wish to stand out from the crowd or look
like your competitors.
brand strategy for brand extension
Extending the brand is best done from a strong conceptual
position. If a brand is known for standing for highly customer centric
values then it is feasible to leap into parallel markets with some ease.
Even though in truth, from a manufacturing point of view, the
experience is not always legitimate. Caterpillar, the famous plant
machinery brand had always marketed the reputation for rugged and
hard working machinery and since 1999 has used these values to
legitimise its outdoor and work wear clothing brand – the idea of
‘hardworking’ appears to be very transferable. In truth it is unlikely
that an intimate knowledge of plant machinery has any relevance at
all for the intricacies of clothing manufacture and marketing.
Apparently the punters do not question this lack of experience.
Similarly, Porsche the German sports car brand markets values of
performance and design for household appliances from kettles to
corkscrews.
brand strategy for market positioning
A fundamental shift in position will also lead to a review of the
brand – for example when bp moved to position ‘Beyond
Petroleum,’ or when Lucozade became an energy drink.
A new brand alone will not change a company’s fortunes 0
70
Abbey, BA, Post Office (Consignia) and M&S all undertook
expensive re0branding exercises without effect, because there was
something fundamentally wrong with the position of their businesses
at the time. The brand change is usually made the scapegoat (much
to the delight of the press) when in fact it is the business position that
has the problem. This is a convenient slight of hand.
When re0positioning things – like your company – we can make a
slight linguistic adjustment and change the positioning significantly.
Positioning can be a subtle affair and two examples come to mind
recently – Prince Charles and Pluto the planet.
Prince Charles now wishes, should he ever become king, to
reposition the Monarch as ‘Defender of Faith’ rather than ‘Defender
of THE Faith’ – not withstanding Henry VIII spinning in his regal
tomb and the Archbishop of Canterbury raising one of his
considerable eyebrows. It’s a good example of the subtlety of
repositioning and how one small word can change the position
completely.
The second example is the galactic re0positioning that took place
recently, much to the solar chagrin of the planet Pluto. After 76 years
masquerading as a planet, Pluto has been found out. The poor thing
is not a planet after all. It is now repositioned as a ‘dwarf planet.’
This fundamental repositioning decision took the combined
intellectual power of 2,500 gathered astronomers to conclude.
When struggling to agree your company position spare a thought
for Pluto. Still it could have been worse for the diminutive body,
because somebody suggested that Pluto wasn’t even a dwarf planet
71
but really just a piece of random space rubble left over from the birth
of our solar system!
Lucozade originally branded its position as a recuperative health
drink with the strap0line ‘Lucozade Aids Recovery.’ When the Aids
pandemic struck in the 80’s Lucozade changed the position to
‘Energy’ without changing the brand. Paradoxically, branding this
changed position, using sports stars such as Daley Thompson
(sponsored brand) at the time, allowed Lucozade to retain the health
reputation whilst at the same time entering new sports and recreation
markets.
The British Queen’s 80th birthday recently reminded us of a great
piece of re0branding. All is not what it seems in the world.
In 1917 at the height of the WW1 anti0German feeling was acute
with the bombing of cities with zeppelins and slaughter in the
Western Front. At the time the royal family was branded with the
name Sax0Coburg0Gotha, a bit on the German side, which reminded
the populous of their very un0british heritage. It was time for a brand
renaming and George V acted as impromptu image and branding
consultant. He came up with the idea of the House of Windsor after
Windsor Castle, built by a French King. The name was adopted and
has stuck. This just shows us how fickle brand naming really is. If
the very UK Royal family can re0brand and remain essentially the
same then all the brouhaha associated with many corporate re0brands
is just macho egotism. This supports the view that it is what is
branded that creates the value, not the brand itself.
72
Anderson, the highly successful accounting and consulting firm,
retained the same position but successfully changed the brand to
Accenture. This shows that the brand and the positions you brand
can change independently. This is an important distinction. The
brand and the positioning are not necessarily intrinsically linked –
one can change without the other and changing one does not
automatically require changing the other either.
The truth is that a new brand without new value will change
nothing. Similarly, if the value of the products increase but the brand
is positioned as low value or poor quality then achieving the right
reputation is challenging but not impossible – VW’s work
repositioning Skoda has turned this brand challenge into a
spectacular success story,
It is really important to remember that it is the quality of the
things you brand, not the brand itself that creates the value. The
brand makes the value visible. This is the purpose of brand strategy.
Beware the brand agency baring excessive promises. A re0branding
will not increase the value unless the thing that is branded is of
value. In ranching terms, a poor quality steer is thin and feeble no
matter how fancy the brand!
73
brand strategy for new leadership or
ownership
Brands are a mark of ownership, so it follows that when this
changes it is time to visit the brand strategy.
Often the acquirer will impose their brand on the company
acquired, sometimes without appropriate communication and
therefore damaging consequences. Employees and customers are
loyal to the original owner 0 if ownership changes it follows that
there needs to be respect shown to the original brand. Replacing one
brand with another without communication is discourteous and
confusing. This doesn’t mean that the original brand needs to be over
indulged either. Being decisive and communicating well is often the
best policy. Some highly acquisitive companies like GE have
developed this process into a fine art.
Sometimes companies will not only merge the business but will
merge the brands themselves e.g. LloydsTSB. This is the least
satisfactory solution as it is unclear who the true owner is 0 brand
compromises are rarely the best solution.
Without new ownership, new product, or new position there is
rarely a reason to dramatically change the brand. When ownership is
consistent the brand needs only to be refreshed to keep pace with
contemporary style and design. Shell, IBM, Barclays, 3M all have
had many iterations in their lifetimes. It is advisable to refresh the
brand every five years.
We have said that a brand strategy is based on choices: about the
74
brand itself (name, colour, typeface symbol) and the things we
choose to brand (the steers – the tangible and intangible things).
There are reasons why we would choose to brand something and
there are choices we can make as to which contexts we place the
brand in.
75
control your brand?
“… direct the
brand from the
boardroom.”
76
In b2b, brand strategy is often not directed from the boardroom.
This would never be the case in a consumer business 0 brand strategy
is most definitely on the board’s agenda. In b2b a brand strategy
vacuum sometimes exists. Branding is sometimes misunderstood and
not deemed relevant – after all …”we don’t have thousands of
customers… ” This may be true but does not justify reducing the
importance of the brand strategy in the competitive advantage mix.
Doing so reduces visibility and furnishes competitive advantage to
the opposition.
Relying on the products to be the brands can weaken rather than
strengthen the value of the brand owner. In the b2b boardroom there
is a problem with definition and there is a tendency to call everything
a brand. This can be very misleading and confusing.
This has two serious consequences:
• the brand is not viewed as an asset and therefore neglected
allowing competitors the potential to take a competitive
opportunity. Paradoxically, this lack of interest in the brand and
branding in the boardroom in others provides the first mover
with considerable advantage in a b2b context – a well executed
brand strategy can release as much as 25 or 30% increased
shareholder value
• forceful product teams in b2b companies create a branded
approach for their area often out of frustration and a correct
belief in the power of brand strategy to create value. However,
because this is reactive rather than strategic it can divert
precious resources in the process. Rather than increasing brand
77
value this can often serve to confuse customers and weaken the
strength of the parent brand. The product begins to usurp the
owner 0 this would not be allowed to happen in the consumer
arena. It may look like the consumer facing product brands are
in the driving seat 0 but this is an illusion. The brand owner is
very much in control 0 making highly considered strategic brand
strategy choices.
78
house of brands or branded house
In business there are many things we wish to use brands to make
more visible and you need to develop a strategy that encourages the
recognition that you desire.
There are fundamentally two approaches:
• choosing to use many brands in many contexts, the house of
brands like Unilever, Kraft, and P&G
• or one brand in many contexts, the branded house like bp,
BMW, ICI and DHL.
More often than not the distinction is less clear0cut and in reality
many consumer companies are a hybrid. We know that the ipod is
brought to us by Apple, KitKat is brought to us by Nestle, BMW
brings us the M series. Knowing where the product comes from is
very important 0 the brand owner ultimately delivers and protects the
customer’s value.
There is a word of caution here for b2b brand strategists.
Consumer companies have the resources and expertise to support
and market multiple brands. They can afford a creative approach.
B2b needs to be selective about how many brands they support.
Too many can weaken the visibility of the parent, or ultimate brand
owner. Many times we have been required to consolidate product
names for b2b companies and make the principle brand more visible.
Brand culling can be a very liberating experience for b2b companies.
This is not only a b2b phenomenon, both Unilever and 3M have
recently culled numerous brands to strengthen and consolidate and
strengthen their overall brand visibility.
79
the rules and the players
When considering the implementation of a brand strategy it is
useful to consider boundaries of responsibility. Football is a helpful
analogy. In football there are the players who play the game on the
pitch – these are like the sales and implementing marketing teams
within an organisation – and then there is FIFA which is the body
that writes the rules. This is like the management team that writes the
rules of the brand strategy. Ideally we need a great set of rules that
keeps the game fair and enhances the play and the spectacle. The
rules need to give the players the space to play creatively and safely
on the pitch. Everyone needs to understand the rules. There is a
balance between the rules and the play. It's that simple.
Sometimes in business the lines between the brand rules and the
brand play get blurred and in the absence of clear strategy the players
have a tendency to get creative! Imagine if the players wrote the
rules of football… mayhem. In business as in football it is usually
pointless to move the game from the pitch to the car park. This is
what happens when there is weak direction of the brand strategy 0
people start playing in all the wrong areas. This can lead to a waste
of resources at one level and more significantly the creation of
multiple brands that compete with each other and reduce the value of
the parent brand itself.
We believe that organisations need to be very clear what the
brand rules are and encourage the players to play creatively on the
right brand pitch.