+ All Categories
Home > Education > The Case for Open

The Case for Open

Date post: 25-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: david-lippman
View: 82 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Thursday evening keynote from the 2014 Washington Community College Math conference.
Popular Tags:
97
The Case for Open Educational Resources David Lippman Pierce College
Transcript
Page 1: The Case for Open

The Case forOpen Educational Resources

David LippmanPierce College

Page 2: The Case for Open

“Open”

Open Educational Resources (OER)

Open Textbooks

Open Learning (MOOCs)

Open Pedagogy

Page 3: The Case for Open

Open Source Software

Free as in “free beer”

Free as in “free speech”

Collaboration

Page 4: The Case for Open

The Promise of Open

Page 5: The Case for Open

Food Machine

Page 6: The Case for Open

Learning Machine

Page 7: The Case for Open

From http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/12/the-college-textbook-bubble-and-how-the-open-educational-resources-movement-is-going-up-against-the-textbook-cartel/

Page 8: The Case for Open

Textbook Costs

$1100 / year

Online access codes

Time-bombed eBooks

Page 9: The Case for Open

“this past spring quarter for math 60 I didn't have a book the entire quarter and I barely scraped by with a 2.0. I used the book and help of tutors in the tutoring center everyday and still did not fully understand the material as much as I wanted. If I continue this way I will surely fail math 98”

Page 10: The Case for Open

“I am afraid that if I can't/don't get this book before the college quarter starts that I will fall behind and possibly even fail the class”

Page 11: The Case for Open

The Direct Relationship Between Textbook Costs and Student Success

60%+ do not purchase textbooks at some point due to cost

35% take fewer courses due to textbook cost

31% choose not to register for a course due to textbook cost

23% regularly go without textbooks due to cost

14% have dropped a course due to textbook cost

10% have withdrawn from a course due to textbook cost

Source: 2012 student survey by Florida Virtual Campus

Page 12: The Case for Open

“70% of respondents had decided against buying at least one assigned textbook due to cost. While some of these students reported sharing or borrowing instead, 78% still believed they would generally do worse in class without their own copy of the required text.”

http://www.studentpirgs.org/news/ap/high-prices-prevent-college-students-buying-assigned-textbooks

Page 13: The Case for Open

Access Inequity

Page 14: The Case for Open

Mainstreamed Materials

Move towards the middle

Content creep

Page 15: The Case for Open

Open ≠ Digital

Open ≠ Free

OPEN

DIGITALFREE

Page 16: The Case for Open

Open is a legal framework for sharing

Page 17: The Case for Open

OER: The 5R PermissionsSharing and creativity are inherent in OER:

•Make and own copies

Retain•Use

the content in its unaltered form

Reuse

•Adapt, adjust, modify, improve, or alter the content

Revise

•Combine the original or revised content with other OER to create something new

Remix

•Share copies of the original content, revisions or remixes with others

Redistribute

Page 18: The Case for Open

Open LicensesCreative Commons

Page 19: The Case for Open

Examples of OER

Open textbooksWorkbooksHandouts

WorksheetsActivities

Videosetc.

Page 20: The Case for Open

The Case for Open

Page 21: The Case for Open

1. Cost Savings

Page 22: The Case for Open

Example: Green River

27 sections of Math 141 each year× 30 students per section× $200 (Amazon retail of Stewart Precalc – cost of printed OER text)

$162,000 saved in one year, in one course

Page 23: The Case for Open

The text had a positive effect on the classroom instructional atmosphere from the very beginning. Many students came to class on the first day with a positive attitude borne of having been to the bookstore and found that their textbook would cost $20 rather than over $100, and even spending that much was optional. Moreover, the vast majority of students had the textbook in one form or another from the outset and so didn’t face the prospect of falling behind because they couldn’t get it until a financial aid check came in.

MAA Review by Mike Kenyon, Green River Community College, 10/15/2012

Page 24: The Case for Open

This is a simple way thatwe as faculty can address

access inequity

Page 25: The Case for Open

2. Education is Sharing

Page 26: The Case for Open

Knowledge

Page 27: The Case for Open
Page 28: The Case for Open
Page 29: The Case for Open

Unprecedented Capacity

we can share as never before

Page 30: The Case for Open

Unprecedented Capacity

we can educate as never before

Page 31: The Case for Open

Except We Can’t

InternetEnables

CopyrightForbids

Page 32: The Case for Open

© Cancels the Possibilities

of digital media and the internet

Page 33: The Case for Open
Page 34: The Case for Open

use copyright to enforce sharing

Page 35: The Case for Open

InternetEnables

Sharing and educating at unprecedented scale

OERAllows

Page 36: The Case for Open

3. Control

Page 37: The Case for Open

At the Most Basic Level

No broken links

No surprise changes

No forced new editions

Page 38: The Case for Open

Open = freedom to

AddRemoveModify

SupplementIgnore the book

Page 39: The Case for Open

I hate this problem

Q: Bob has $10,000 invested in two accounts, one paying 4% interest and the other paying 6% interest. He earned $520 interest last year. How much does he have invested in each account?

A: Read your statements, Bob!

Page 40: The Case for Open

I don’t hate this problem

Q: Bob is retiring with $1 million. He can invest in a safe CD earning 1%, or a riskier bond account earning 4%. He wants to live on interest, and needs $30,000 a year to live on. What’s the minimum he needs to invest in the bond account?

Page 41: The Case for Open

Customize and Localize

Searching through dozens of books for the perfect table of contents

vs

Mixing contents from multiple texts to create a perfect match for your outcomes

Page 42: The Case for Open

I’m Sold!

Show me the goods!

Page 43: The Case for Open

Where We’ve Come From

Page 44: The Case for Open
Page 45: The Case for Open
Page 46: The Case for Open
Page 47: The Case for Open
Page 48: The Case for Open
Page 49: The Case for Open

Community of users

Creating for themselves

Sharing with everyone

Making it better for all

Page 50: The Case for Open

Expanding to Open Texts

Page 51: The Case for Open
Page 52: The Case for Open
Page 53: The Case for Open
Page 54: The Case for Open
Page 55: The Case for Open
Page 56: The Case for Open
Page 57: The Case for Open
Page 58: The Case for Open

MyOpenMath

Page 59: The Case for Open
Page 60: The Case for Open
Page 61: The Case for Open
Page 62: The Case for Open
Page 63: The Case for Open

ArithmeticPrealgebraBeg AlgebraInter AlgebraCollege AlgebraTrigApplied CalculusCalculusMath for Lib ArtsStatistics

Page 64: The Case for Open

Lots of Personal Projects

Page 65: The Case for Open

But is it any good?

Page 66: The Case for Open

There’s no reason to use a proxy for quality when we can measure

student success

Page 67: The Case for Open

High School Data

No significant difference

Page 68: The Case for Open

Scottsdale Data

No significant difference

Page 69: The Case for Open

Results – Math in Society

Commercial text + Blackboard (‘06-’08 data)70.2% pass rate, n = 131

IMathAS + Open Text v1 (‘08-’11 data)72.4% pass rate, n = 236

IMathAS + Open Text v2 (’12-’13 data)80.4% pass rate, n = 92

*No statistically significant difference

Page 70: The Case for Open

Success Data - CalculusStewart/Hoffman Comparison

Bellevue College used Stewart (2006-07) and Hoffman (2007-08)

Stewart N=622

Success = “ABC” = 74.4% Success range: 42 – 90%

Hoffman N=710

Success = “ABC” = 74.8% Success range: 40 – 95%

Page 71: The Case for Open

Student Success Data - Precalc

4850 students at Pierce, Green River, and Shoreline have used our text (over the last 2 years), vs. 5000 past students saw no significant difference in success, while saving $300,000+

Page 72: The Case for Open

Student Success Data - Algebra

Big Bend switched completely to an emporium model.

Success rate jumped from 48% to 75%, and withdraw rate dropped from 25% to 9%

Page 73: The Case for Open

Mercy College - (Wallace Algebra)Percentage passing with C or better

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

63.60%68.90%

48.40%

60.18%55.91%

64.50%

Fall 2011No OER

Fall 2012OER

Spring 2011No OER

Spring 2013OER

TotalNo OER

TotalOER

n=2,842 including pilot

Page 74: The Case for Open
Page 75: The Case for Open

“The student feedback I've received (to the texts I and others have used, as well as the associated WAMAP material and James Sousa videos) has been virtually 100% positive. And it's not just the low-to-nonexistent price: we've received many comments about how these books are much easier for them to read than traditional textbooks, how WAMAP is far superior to Webassign, and how helpful they find the videos.”

- Jeff Eldridge, Edmonds CC

Page 76: The Case for Open
Page 77: The Case for Open

What’s Coming?

Page 78: The Case for Open
Page 79: The Case for Open
Page 80: The Case for Open

Z Degree: Tidewater Community College's textbook answer

The college estimates that students who complete their degree through the textbook-free program could save one-third on the cost of college.

Page 81: The Case for Open
Page 82: The Case for Open
Page 83: The Case for Open
Page 84: The Case for Open

Departments take ownership

Page 85: The Case for Open

Adoption

Page 86: The Case for Open

A Call to Action

Page 87: The Case for Open

One of the few wayswe as faculty can directly address

access inequity

Page 88: The Case for Open

Think about the Return on Investment

Page 89: The Case for Open

Make it yours

Page 90: The Case for Open

Teach Openly

Page 91: The Case for Open

Look at an Open Course

Page 92: The Case for Open

Contribute

Page 93: The Case for Open

Contribute

ProofreadCreate activities

Add new exercisesCreate videos

Join a collaboration

Page 94: The Case for Open

the Learning Machine is being built

Join in

Page 95: The Case for Open

Thank you

David [email protected]

http://dlippman.imathas.com

Page 96: The Case for Open

Want to work on a contextual / conceptual / active learning algebra

course?

Email me!Contribute rich tasks to:

wamap.org/projects/

David [email protected]

http://dlippman.imathas.com

Page 97: The Case for Open

Attribution Statement

This slidedeck is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License and contains content from a variety of sources published under a variety of open licenses, including:

• Original content created by David Lippman of Pierce College and Lumen Learning• Content created by David Wiley, originally published at

http://www.slideshare.net/opencontent/ under a CC-BY license.• Food machine photo, original published at http://www.flickr.com/photos/cvander/

under a CC-BY license• Freaky skull photo, original published at

http://www.flickr.com/photos/erikcharlton/2955613283/sizes/m/in/photostream/ under a CC-BY license


Recommended