+ All Categories
Home > Health & Medicine > The challenges of monitoring and permanence

The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Date post: 22-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: rightsandclimate
View: 1,759 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Simon Counsell, Director, Rainforest Foundation UK
18
Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people Simon Counsell, Director, Rainforest Foundation UK
Transcript
Page 1: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous peopleSimon Counsell, Director, Rainforest Foundation UK

Page 2: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 3: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

“Forest” is a minimum area of land of 0.05-1.0 hectares with tree crown cover…of more than 10-30 per cent with trees with the potential to reach a minimum height of 2-5 metres at maturity in situ…[…]…Young natural stands and all plantations which have yet to reach a crown density of 10-30 per cent or tree height of 2-5 metres are included under forest…”

UNFCCC, ‘Marrakesh Accords, 21 January 2002

Monitoring/definitions

Page 4: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Natural re-growth on previously cleared land?

Semi-natural forest?

Natural forest?

Page 5: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 6: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 7: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 8: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Targeting the wrong people?

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 9: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 10: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 11: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Minimum standards for Independent Forest Monitoring:

- Access to information - Freedom to investigate and monitor- Reporting Panel- Freedom to publish

Monitoring

Page 12: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Independent monitoring specific to REDD:

- Rights to the resource - Transparency and participation in decision-making- Product and service tracking- Law enforcement- Revenue distribution- Accountability

Monitoring

Page 13: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

International agency

National agency

Sub-national/provincial agency

Local agency/communities

Independent audit of transactions

Independent monitoring of results

Within or between communities

Page 14: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

• Gold Standard (GS) • Voluntary Carbon Standard (VCS)• VER+• The Voluntary Offset Standard (VOS)• Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX)• The Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards (CCBS)• Plan Vivo System• CarbonFix Standard (CFS)• ….how many more to come…??……

Which standard?

Page 15: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 16: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Page 17: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

Permanence

Page 18: The challenges of monitoring and permanence

Monitoring, permanence, and indigenous people

“The consequences of the displacement and resettlement [of indigenous peoples] has in turn a set of degrading effects on forest ecosystems.”

(Cernea and Schmidt-Soltau, 2003)

Permanence


Recommended