+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher...

The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher...

Date post: 20-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 217 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
25
The Consequences of a The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of Density on the Evolution of the Universe the Universe By Christopher Limbach, By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Stiteler Background image: Andrey Kravtsov., University of Chicago, 2003.
Transcript
Page 1: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

The Consequences of a The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Dynamical Dark Energy

Density on the Evolution of Density on the Evolution of the Universethe Universe

By Christopher Limbach, By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Alexander Luce, and Amanda

StitelerStitelerBackground image: Andrey Kravtsov., University of Chicago, 2003.

Page 2: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Presentation Overview

• Amanda Stiteler– Introduction– Theory

• Chris Limbach– Assumptions– Verification of Methods

• Alex Luce– Results– Conclusion

Image by Martin Altmann, Observatory Hoher List, 1997.

Page 3: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

The Big Bang in BriefThe Big Bang in Brief

Page 4: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Einstein’s Cosmological ModelEinstein’s Cosmological Model

Rij = Ricci tensor

R = curvature scalargij = space-time metric tensor

G = Newton’s gravitational constantTij = stress-energy tensor

Λ = cosmological constant

ijijijij GTgRgR 82

1

Page 5: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

The Friedmann EquationThe Friedmann Equation

a = dimensionless scale factorρR = relativistic matter density

ρM = non-relativistic matter density

ρΛ = dark energy density

k = curvature of the universec = speed of lightl0 = present distance between two galaxies

22

0

22

3

81

al

kcG

dt

da

a MR

Page 6: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

QuintessenceQuintessence• Equation relating the scalar field, , and its

potential, :

• Energy density of the scalar field:

• Evolution of the scalar field:

22

2

32 pp m

m

02

3 )1(2 pma

a

V

V

Page 7: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Free Parameters Free Parameters andand

• Parameters which characterize potential

• Chosen such that V(φ) mimics nearly constant Λ at present

V

Page 8: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Purpose of this ProjectPurpose of this Project

• Compare the evolution of a universe Compare the evolution of a universe with constant dark energy density to with constant dark energy density to one with variable dark energy densityone with variable dark energy density

• Determine restrictions of the Determine restrictions of the constants constants κκ and and αα

Image by NASA., 2006.

Page 9: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

AssumptionsAssumptions• Homogeneous, Isotropic Universe

• (from WMAP)

• Total Density = Critical Density

• Initial Conditions for ΩR, ΩM, ΩΛ from WMAP

• No Spatial Curvature

Mpc

kmH

1

sec680

critMR

critcrit

MM

crit

RR

,,

Page 10: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.
Page 11: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

MethodMethod

• 4th Order Runge-Kutta• Equations Solved:

RMadt

da

3

8

dt

d

a

a

dt

d3

2)1(

Page 12: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Numeric SolutionsNumeric Solutions

Time Relative to Present [Gyrs]

Scale Factor

a

1

0

0.01

“Time of Big Bang”

t

Page 13: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Verification Verification

h= 0.02

h = 0.01

h = 0.005

Time From Present [Gyrs]

Scale Factor

1

Solutionerror δh

t

a

h= time step

Page 14: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.
Page 15: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Simulation ResultsSimulation Results

Constant Dark Energy vs. Time Dependent Dark Energy?

Restrictions on Free Parameters of Model

Page 16: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Dark Energy: Dark Energy: ConstantConstant

• Radiation Plays Large role at early times

• Matter Increases as radiation dies off

• Dominated by Dark Energy at later times

Page 17: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Dark Energy: Dark Energy: Time DependentTime Dependent

• Dominated by Dark Energy at early times

• Again dominated by Dark Energy at later times

• Kappa and Alpha were chosen to agree w/ observations

• Amount of radiation is relatively lower

Page 18: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Dark Energy: Constant vs. Time Dependent

Page 19: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Free Parameters Constrained Free Parameters Constrained by Age of Universeby Age of Universe

Page 20: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Scale FactorScale Factor

• Represents relative expansion of universe

• Independent of Free Parameters which characterize expansion

Page 21: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Power Law Model of Time Power Law Model of Time Dependent dark energy: Dependent dark energy:

PossiblePossible• Free Parameters do

not influence Dynamical behaviour

• WMAP findings: Universe is >13.7 billion years old

Page 22: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments

• Dimitrios Psaltis• Chi Kwan Chan• Drew Milsom

Page 23: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Sources CitedSources CitedKravtsov, Andrey. “Computer-generated image of the distribution of dark matter.” Image

from “Cosmologists to plot strategy for dark energy research campaign at Chicago workshop Sept. 17-20.” 3 Sept 2003. 29 April 2007. <http://www-news.uchicago.edu/ releases/03/030903.darkmatter.shtml>.

Limbach, Christopher, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler. “The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe.” 5 Dec 2006. 29 April 2007. <http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~dpsaltis/Phys205/limbach_luce_stiteler.pdf >.

NASA. “WMAP picture of the infant universe.” Image from “Ringside Seat to the Universe’s First Split Second.” 20 March 2006. 30 April 2007. <http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ features/news/20mar06.html>.

National Taiwan Science Education Center. “The origin and the evolution of the Universe.” Image from “The Emergence of the Cosmos.” 29 April 2007. <http://www.ntsec.gov.tw/ space/EN/show.asp?XH36>.

WMAP. “Geometry of the Universe.” “Image from “Sachs-Wolfe Effect.” 2 May 2007. <http://zebu.uoregon.edu/2004/a321/lec15.html>.

Page 24: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Free Parameters Constrained by Free Parameters Constrained by Age of UniverseAge of Universe

Page 25: The Consequences of a Dynamical Dark Energy Density on the Evolution of the Universe By Christopher Limbach, Alexander Luce, and Amanda Stiteler Background.

Energy DensityEnergy Density


Recommended