Date post: | 17-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | maximillian-frank-melton |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Council of Chief State School Officers
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
February 14, 2012
Implementing Your Educator Effectiveness Agenda
Webinar Logistics
Everyone is muted
Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question
You may chat privately with individuals on your team
If you have problems, you may send William Bentgen a message via the chat function or an email at [email protected]
2
Bobbi Burnham, CPEP Project , Office of the Deputy Commissioner
Steve Dibb, Director of the Division of School Support
Debbi Luedtke, Professional Development-Q Comp TAP, Supervisor, Division of School Support
Minnesota Department of Education Participants
4
North Carolina & NIRN Participants
Amy Scrinzi, K-5 Mathematics, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Dan Tetreault, K-5 English Language Arts, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Dean Fixsen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, Co-Director and Founding Member, National Implementation Research Network
Barbara Sims, Associate Director, National Implementation Research Network
5
State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence-based Practices (SISEP)
Current methods for encouraging the use of evidence-based programs and other innovations in education are insufficient
Islands of excellence
Implementation science and best practices are universal and apply equally well in education
A sea of change
6
Evidence-base Actual SupportsYears 1-3
OutcomesYears 4-5
Every Teacher Trained
Fewer than 50% of the teachers received some training
Fewer than 10% of the schools used the CSR as intended
Every Teacher Continually Supported
Fewer than 25% of those teachers received support
Vast majority of students did not benefit
Aladjem & Borman, 2006; Vernez, Karam, Mariano, & DeMartini, 2006
Longitudinal Studies of a Variety of Comprehensive School Reforms
Implementation Science
7
Formula for Success
Effective intervention
X
Effective implementation
=
Effective outcomes
0.97
0.03
0.03
X
8
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
All Students & Families
All Students & Families
School Teachers and
Staff
School Teachers and
Staff
StateDepartment Leadership
StateDepartment Leadership
1 for each SchoolBuilding
Implementation Team
Building Implementation
Team
Implementation-Skilled Workforce
Staff with special implementation skills
Re
-Pu
rpo
se
“District” Implementation
Teams
“District” Implementation
Teams1 for every group of 15-25 Schools
Regional Implementation
Teams
Regional Implementation
Teams
1 for every group of 4 “Districts”
Adult interactions produce Student benefits
9
Implementation Team
Regional, District, Building Teams
Know innovations very well (formal and craft knowledge)
Know implementation very well (formal and craft knowledge)
Know improvement cycles to make interventions and implementation methods more effective and efficient over time
10
Impl. Team NO Impl. Team
Effective
Effective use of Implementation Science & Practice
IMPLEMENTATION
INT
ER
VE
NT
ION
80%, 3 Yrs 14%, 17 Yrs
Balas & Boren, 2000 Green & Seifert, 2005
Fixsen, Blase, Timbers, & Wolf, 2001
Letting it Happen Helping it Happen
Implementation Team
11
YEARS
AM
OU
NT
S
Funding
Cap
acity
Implementation TeamsOrganization ChangeSystem Reinvention
Capacity Building
12
Defined and Measureable Goals
Evidence-Based PracticesData-Driven Decision MakingTiered Levels of Support that
Accelerate the Learning of ALL Students
Implementation of Instruction/Intervention as Intended
Culturally Responsive Teaching and Learning
Aligned with MN Pre K-12 State and Local Academic Standards
Parent and Community Engagement
Stages of Implementation (exploration and adoption, program installation, innovation/refinement, sustainability)
Core Implementation Components (staff selection, training, coaching, evaluation, systems intervention)
Leadership at ALL levels (technical and adaptive)
Coherent Alignment of Policies and Practices (implementation teams, continuous feedback loop, shared vision, collaboration, data support, professional development)
Principles of
Effective Practice (“What”)
Key Components of
Implementation (“How”)
MN Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
Coaching
Training
Selection
Integrated & Compensatory
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers Systems
Intervention
Facilitative Administration
Decision Support Data System
Organization D
rivers
Organization D
rivers
AdaptiveTechnical
Leadership DriversLeadership Drivers
Performance Assessment (fidelity)
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Dri
vers
Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions
meetImplementation
Reliable Student Benefits
14
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
Coaching
Training
Selection
Integrated & Compensatory
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers
Com
pete
ncy
Driv
ers Systems
Intervention
Facilitative Administration
Decision Support Data System
Organization D
rivers
Organization D
rivers
AdaptiveTechnical
Leadership DriversLeadership Drivers
Performance Assessment (fidelity)
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Dri
vers
Consistent uses of Innovations Interventions
meetImplementation
Reliable Student Benefits
15
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
System Reinvention
17
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
System Reinvention
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
18
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
System Reinvention
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
19
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
System Reinvention
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
20
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
System Reinvention
21
Implementation Team
StateManagement
Team
TeachersInnovations
Students
Sys
tem
C
han
ge
Adaptive Challenges• Duplication• Fragmentation• Hiring criteria• Salaries• Credentialing• Licensing• Time/ scheduling• Union contracts• RFP methods• Federal/ State laws
SIS
EP
Sy
ste
m C
han
ge
Su
pp
ort
Pra
ctic
e-
Po
licy
C
om
mu
nic
ati
on
Cy
cle
Po
licy
Su
pp
orts
Effe
ctive
Pra
ctice
System Reinvention
22
© Fixsen & Blase, 2008
All Students & Families
All Students & Families
School Teachers and
Staff
School Teachers and
Staff
StateDepartment Leadership
StateDepartment Leadership
Building Implementation
Team
Building Implementation
Team
“District” Implementation
Teams
“District” Implementation
Teams
Regional Implementation
Teams
Regional Implementation
TeamsTransformation Zone
A vertical slice of the system
23
For More Information
Dean L. Fixsen, Ph.D. 919-966-3892 [email protected]
Karen A. Blase, Ph.D. 919-966-9050 [email protected]
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC
http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/ www.scalingup.org
www.implementationconference.org
24
Implementation Science
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).Download all or part of the monograph at:http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature
25
Upcoming Webinars
Connecting Educator Effectiveness and Common Core Implementation, Tuesday, March 13, 2:00-3:30 p.m. EDT
Special Webinar: International Summit on Preparation, Tuesday, March 20, 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. EDT
Regular monthly webinars, the second Tuesday of each month, from 2:00-3:00 or 3:30 p.m. ET
26
Planning for the Summit
May 2-4, Seattle, WA
National Summit on Educator Effectiveness
Special Preparatory Webinar: Coherence and Comprehensiveness: Using Your Theory of Action
April 10, 2:00-3:30 pm ET
27
Questions
If you have additional questions for the presenters, SCEE members can post them to: http://scee.groupsite.com/group/scee/discussion/topic/show/534964
28
Contact Information
Education Workforce InitiativeJanice Poda, [email protected]
ESEA Flexibility Toolkit for Principle 3Circe Stumbo, West Wind Education Policy/[email protected]
State Policy DatabaseValerie Nyberg, West Wind Education Policy/[email protected]
29