Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | leon-hubbard |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Courts’ Potential Role in Transforming Mental Health Care in
Alaska
2005 Mental Health Consumer & Family Leadership Conference
April 13, 2005By James B. (Jim) Gottstein, Esq.
Objectives
• Sense of the Courts’ Potential Role in Transformation of the Mental Health System Towards Recovery
• Understanding of Possible Types of Court Action.
• Recognition that Courts Can Only Be Part of Solution
• Discussion
Litigation Can Cause Great System Change
• Desegregation Litigation
• In Alaska:– Molly Hootch (Education)– Cleary (Prisoners’ Rights)– Weiss (Mental Health Trust)
Types of Legal Remedies
• Precedent – “This is the Law”• Injunctions – “You Are Ordered to . . .”• Declaratory Judgment – “Your Rights Are”
• Damages – $$$$– Class Actions – Really for mass torts
• Lawyers Make Out/Most Class Members Don’t• MH Trust as Class Action was a Mistake
• 42 USC §1983 – Liability (fed ct) for violation of civil rights
Illegal Aspects of the Alaska Mental Health System
• Commitment• Forced Drugging
– Civil– Prison
• Informed Consent• “Tying” Services & Entitlements• “Meaningful Involvement in Grantee Agencies”• Treatment Planning• AMC Title 21 (Quasi-Institutional Housing)
Others? (suggestions)
• Gender Choice for Intimate Care Staff?
• AS 47.30.840 Rights??
• ?
• ?
• ?
• ?
These Illegalities Can Hinder Recovery (worsen prognosis)
• Forced Drugging
• Informed Consent Lack of Effective Alternatives
• Retraumatizing Victims of Abuse
• Lack of Housing
Civil Commitment
Illegalities• Less Restrictive
Alternative• Dangerousness
– Gravely Disabled
• Perjury• Inadequate
Representation?
Solutions• Strategic
Litigation/Negotiation• Alternatives• Good Representation• 42 USC §1983 Action
Forced Drugging (Civil)
Illegalities• Best Interests• Less Restrictive
Alternative• Perjury• Inadequate
Representation?
Solutions• Strategic
Litigation/Negotiation• Alternatives• Good Representation• Guardianships?• 42 USC §1983 Action
PsychRights’ Forced Drugging Alaska Litigation Strategy
• Negotiations have Failed
• Forced Drugging -- Myers Case– Least Restrictive Alternative?– Soteria-Alaska in Wings
• Sue to enforce if get Ruling
• Potentially 42 USC §1983
Forced Drugging (Prison)
Illegalities (Bavilla Case)• Not Adversarial• Not Allow Confrontation• Not Allow Presentation• Not Unbiased Decision
Maker• Insufficient Notice• Not Allow representation?• Sell criteria?
– Sufficient state interests, necessary, achieve state interests, medically appropriate, least intrusive means, court decide
Solutions• New Case• Alternatives
Informed Consent under AS 47.30.837(d)(2) (Inpatient)• All information that is material to the patient's decision to
give or withhold consent, including:– an explanation of the patient's diagnosis and prognosis, or their
predominant symptoms, with and without the medication; – information about the proposed medication, its purpose, the
method of its administration, the recommended ranges of dosages, possible side effects and benefits, ways to treat side effects, and risks of other conditions, such as tardive dyskinesia;
– a review of the patient's history, including medication history and previous side effects from medication;
– an explanation of interactions with other drugs, including over-the-counter drugs, street drugs, and alcohol; and
– information about alternative treatments and their risks, side effects, and benefits, including the risks of nontreatment.
Informed Consent
Illegalities• Prognosis• Efficacy• Toxicity• Alternatives• Battery
Solution• Find a Plaintiff• Tell the Truth• Alternatives
– ACMHS??– CHOICES in the Wings
Informed Consent Case Drafted
“Tying” Services & Entitlements
Illegalities• All from us• Meds or nothing• Meds or no housing• Meds or hospital• Meds or jail
Solutions• Litigation?• Independent Case
Management?– Alternatives
“Meaningful Involvement in Grantee Agencies”
Illegalities• Sufficient consumer and
family membership on Board of Directors for meaningful input
• Grant Violation
Solutions• Litigation?• Get in Regulations?
Treatment Planning
Illegalities• Lack of Involvement
in Treatment Plan• Violation of Federal &
State law?• Grant Violation
Solutions• Litigation?• Alternatives
AMC Title 21 (Quasi Institutional Housing)
Illegality
• Discriminatory
Solution
• Abolish
Has this Been Has this Been Fixed?Fixed?
Gender Choice For Intimate Care
Illegality• Right to choose?
Solution• Right to Choose
• Legislation
• Litigation
AS 47.30.825 Rights
Illegality• Go down list
Solution• Criminal Charges
under AS 47.30.835?
• Litigation
Bringing Legal Pressure
• PsychRights -- Mission is Forced Drugging
– Pro Bono Recruitment
• Set Disability Law Center Agenda– PAIMI Council– Board of Directors
• Others?– Consumers Counsel type of program??