Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lily-morris |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Critical Language Classroom: Euphoria, Despair and Relief
Dr. Isabel Moreno-LopezAssociate Professor of Spanish
Goucher College
Critical Pedagogy
• The educational system has often been defined as a system in which specific cultural values are reproduced through the transmission of habitus, which often functions to legitimize the interests of the dominant classes (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1998).
• Critical pedagogy encourages the questioning of this habitus to empower students and teachers to question conventional ways of perceiving the world in order to enhance their learning.
• One of the goals of critical pedagogy is to create engaged, active, critically thinking citizens, that is to say, political subjects who can participate as decision-makers in the organization of their socio-cultural realities (Freire, 1970, Giroux, 1992). Voice (Giroux, 1992, hooks, 1994).
Critical Ethnography
• Critical theory and practice guides this project because it can frame the language classroom as a progressive space for learning about foreign cultures.
• Data for this research project were collected through participant observation and the review of primary documents.
• Data analysis incorporates both the participants and the teacher/researcher’s interpretations of the phenomena under investigation, that is the emic and etic interpretations (Cresswell, 1998, p. 60).
Teacher/Researcher
• In this study, I was a complete-member-observer (full participant) because, as the teacher, I was a member of the classroom community. I observed one Intermediate-Advanced Spanish course that I taught (a total of forty-five hours), and maintained daily fieldnotes in which I described with as much detail as possible not only what went on in the classroom, but also my ideas, feelings, and hunches. Other primary data sources were the teacher/researcher’s daily journal, students journals, anonymous course evaluations, six hours of videotaped sessions and copies of all students’ written assignments which also assisted in the triangulation of the data.
Participants
• The course under study was composed of 17 female students, 12 male students and the teacher/researcher, but only 24 students completed the course at the end of the semester.
• Thirteen students were under the age of 20, 14 between the ages of 20 and 25, and 2 were 31 years old.
• The teacher was Hispanic, a native of Spain, and identified Spanish as her first language. Nineteen students reported to be White-American, five African-American, one Persian-American, one Colombian-American, one Italian-Hispanic, one Asian-Irish-American, and one Haitian.
• Eleven students reported that they were unemployed, two stated that they only worked during school holidays; twelve held part-time jobs, two of which were on-campus; and six students indicated that they were employed full-time. Finally, all the students shared English as their first language.
Course ComponentsCourse Components Location Language Used
Contract Method and grading Process In class English
Out-of-Class Requirement Out of class English/Spanish
Reaction Papers Out of class Spanish
Cross-cultural activities Graded assignment Spanish
Textbook Analysis Graded assignment Spanish
Mass Media Analysis Graded assignment Spanish
Mini-Ethnographic Projects Graded assignment Spanish
Diarios Graded assignments Spanish
Video-taped activities In class Spanish
Journals In class English
Journal Discussion In class English
Results
• Euphoric Phase: Excitement participants experience when they engage in the creation of a new project. Participants cooperate to overcome obstacles encountered; thus, facilitating the process of implementing a new approach in the classroom.
• Despair Phase: By mid-semester, all the participants were experiencing the challenges of the new procedures. Frustration and anger emerged and students started questioning and blaming the teacher.
• Relief Phase: By the end of the semester, participants started experiencing a sense of accomplishment and of pride in work well done.
Euphoric Phase
• No exams and re-writing;
• Working in groups, learning from each other, learning as a process and not as an end, and the negotiation process;
• Out-of-class requirement: easy victory for students.
Despair Phase
• blaming the teacher for their low grades.
• questioning her feedback.
• questioning her knowledge: “En general pienso que sea una portada muy buena” (“In general, I believe it is a good cover [for the textbook]”). WEIRDO
• abusing class procedures;
• questioning the class procedures:
Rafael: Email Message
• Hopefully this is the last paper you will get from me. I do have one question for you. What would hurt me more, having a B+ on one paper when going for an A, or having one late assignment? I just looked at the contract and realized that for the A we cannot have any late assignments. I just am curious because you had me rewrite the 'Analisis de libros' to get it from a B+ to an A, but that caused me to have a late assignment. I just feel like that caused more damage. Thanks for everything this semester.
Martha: Journal Entry
• I had an extremely difficult time in this class. I think it’s a good idea – but the ‘idea’ is better than the reality. The out-of-class work way exceeds the traditional 12 hours of conversation class. The writing is helpful but for every assignment – even 1-page Spanish journals – I’d spent at least 2 ½ - 3 hours working on it … Surprisingly though, I liked the debates. They made me want to be able to articulate my thoughts in Spanish. Also, the cultural focus made the class more interesting. The ethnographic [project] was very difficult but I felt that was an important and useful way to integrate language and culture. Overall it was a very challenging class that demanded a lot more than I expected.
Implications and Reflections
• The negotiation process needs a fair amount of time.
• It is not necessary to apply all of the components, teacher/researchers may apply different components in different semesters.
• It would be advisable to establish a limit to the number of re-writes, I don't allow more than two.
• The out-of-class requirement can be translated to community-base learning components and on-line components.
• The teacher/researcher should accept the emotional ups and downs as part of the procedure and not interpret them as failure of the process.