+ All Categories
Home > Documents > The Crummer Bluff Mansions

The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Date post: 19-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: buck-sullivan
View: 232 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Why? Why Five Mansions (subdivision)? Why 10,000 square feet? Why 40’ tall trees? Why only 1.7 acres of park (on top of leach field)? Why $2 Million? Why no visitor serving alternatives? 08-12-15 Slide 2
14
08-12-15 Slide 1 The Crummer Bluff Mansions Presentation to the California Coastal Commission August 12, 2015 LCP-4-MAL-14-0408-1 (W 12b) By Sherman L. Stacey, Esq. Gaines & Stacey LLP For Green Acres, LLC
Transcript
Page 1: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

08-12-15 Slide 1

The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Presentation to theCalifornia Coastal Commission

August 12, 2015LCP-4-MAL-14-0408-1 (W 12b)

BySherman L. Stacey, Esq.

Gaines & Stacey LLPFor

Green Acres, LLC

Page 2: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Why?

08-12-15 Slide 2

Why Five Mansions (subdivision)?Why 10,000 square feet?Why 40’ tall trees? Why only 1.7 acres of park (on top of leach field)? Why $2 Million? Why no visitor serving alternatives?

Page 3: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Project Inconsistent with Coastal Act30213 – Visitor serving and recreation shall be protected.

30222 – Visitor serving shall have priority over private residential.

30223 – Upland areas necessary to support coastal recreation shall be reserved.

30250(a) – Limits land divisions.

30252 – New development should enhance public access.

08-12-15 Slide 3

Page 4: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Project Inconsistent with Malibu LUP 2.33 – Priority shall be given to visitor-serving and commercial recreation.

2.34 – New visitor-serving shall be encouraged.

2.36 – Coastal recreation and visitor-serving shall be protected.

2.37 – Priority shall be given to recreational uses not currently available.

2.78 – Property to be Commercial Visitor-Serving (CV-2).

5.35 – Land divisions to be minimized.

5.36 – Land divisions to minimize impacts to public access.

6.1 – Scenic and visual qualities shall be protected.

6.2 – Scenic vistas from parks are public viewing areas.

6.4 – Vistas of the ocean are scenic.

6.5 – New development shall minimize impacts on scenic views.08-12-15 Slide 4

Page 5: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

View Blockage Impacts

“Unavoidably visible”-Staff Report p.39

08-12-15 Slide 5

Crummer Bluff Mansions

Page 6: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

View Effects from Scenic Vistas -Green Acres View Impacts –Visitors, pedestrians and hikers traversing the site trails will have their panoramic scenic vistas altered extensively.

Malibu Canyon View Impacts –Travelers heading West on Malibu Canyon Road will have their scenic vistas altered from multiple vantage points.

Bluffs Park View Impacts –Visitors and users of Malibu Bluffs Park will have their scenic vista of the Bay almost totally obscured.

08-12-15 Slide 6

PCH View Impacts –Scenic views will be impacted on both up coast and down coast sides of Pacific Coast Highway.

Page 7: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

08-12-15 Slide 7

Scenic Vistas Perspective Map

Malibu M

emorial

Park

Bluffs Park

Crummer Bluff Mansions

PCH South

Pepperdine

University

PCH North

Page 8: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Sample View Blockage From Malibu Bluffs ParkPhotos from Crummer own EIR Fig 5.1-18.

08-12-15 Slide 8

Page 9: The Crummer Bluff Mansions
Page 10: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

08-12-15 Slide 9

Failure to Consider Visitor Serving Alternatives

“Lower cost visitor serving and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and where

feasible provided.- Malibu LCP

Crummer Bluff Mansions

Page 11: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Equestrian Center AlternativeA feasible all “Visitor Serving” use.

Slide 10

Reduced Visual Impacts:Changing from Residential to a low building profile Visitor Serving Use will also reduce Blue-Water view blockage.

08-12-15

Page 12: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Crummer Bluff Mansions

Fewer Homes Eliminate Lots 1 - 2

Smaller Homes 5,000-6,000 sq.ft.

08-12-15 Slide 11

Cluster the homes Limit Landscape

Height $2M must be

Justified

Failure to Address Commissioner Concerns raised at

February 2015 hearing

Page 13: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

Slide 1208-12-15

Page 14: The Crummer Bluff Mansions

So Why?

08-12-15 Slide 13

Why Five Mansions?Why 10,000 square feet?Why 40’ tall trees? Why only 1.7 acres of park? Why $2 Million? Why no visitor serving alternatives?


Recommended