DMD#51631
1
The CYP2B6*6 allele significantly alters the N-demethylation of ketamine
enantiomers in vitro.
Yibai Li, Janet K. Coller, Mark R. Hutchinson, Kathrin Klein, Ulrich M. Zanger,
Nathan J. Stanley, Andrew D. Abell, Andrew A. Somogyi.
Author affiliations: Discipline of Pharmacology, University of Adelaide, SA,
Australia (Y.L, J.K.C, A.A.S); Discipline of Physiology, The University of Adelaide,
SA, Australia (M.R.H); Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical
Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany and University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
(K.K, U.M.Z); Department of Chemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New
Zealand (N.J.S); Discipline of Chemistry, The University of Adelaide, SA, Australia
(A.D.A) and Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine, University of Adelaide, SA,
Australia (A.A.S)
DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as doi:10.1124/dmd.113.051631
Copyright 2013 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
2
Running title page
Running title: CYP2B6*6 and ketamine metabolism Corresponding author: Yibai Li,
• Address: Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Level 5,
Medical School North, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia,
5005
• Telephone: 61 (08)83135985
• Fax: 61 (08)82240685
• Email: [email protected]
Number of text pages: 31
Number of tables: 2
Number of figures: 6
Number of references: 32
Number of words in the Abstract: 249
Number of words in the Introduction: 587
Number of words in the Discussion: 1393
Abbreviations:
CLint, intrinsic clearance; Cyt b5, cytochrome b5; HLMs, human liver microsomes;
HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; Km: Michaelis-Menten constant;
P450, cytochrome P450; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
3
Abstract:
Ketamine is primarily metabolized to norketamine by hepatic cytochrome P450
(CYP) 2B6 and CYP3A4-mediated N-demethylation. However, the relative
contribution from each enzyme remains controversial. The CYP2B6*6 allele is
associated with reduced enzyme expression and activity that may lead to
interindividual variability in ketamine metabolism. We examined the N-demethylation
of individual ketamine enantiomers using human liver microsomes (HLMs)
genotyped for the CYP2B6*6 allele, insect cell expressed recombinant CYP2B6 and
CYP3A4 enzymes and COS-1 cell expressed recombinant CYP2B6.1 and CYP2B6.6
protein variant. Effects of CYP-selective inhibitors on norketamine formation were
also determined in HLMs. The two-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model best fitted the
HLM kinetic data. The Km value for the high affinity enzyme and the low affinity
enzyme were similar to those for the expressed CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, respectively.
The intrinsic clearance for both ketamine enantiomers by the high affinity enzyme in
HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype were at least 2-fold and 6-fold higher,
respectively, than those for CYP2B6*1/*6 genotype and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotype. The
Vmax and Km values for CYP2B6.1 were approximately 160% and 70% of those for
CYP2B6.6, respectively. ThioTEPA (CYP2B6 inhibitor, 25 μM) and the monoclonal
antibody against CYP2B6 but not troleandomycin (CYP3A4 inhibitor, 25 μM) or the
monoclonal antibody against CYP3A4 inhibited ketamine N-demethylation at
clinically relevant concentrations. The degree of inhibition was significantly reduced
in HLMs with the CYP2B6*6 allele (gene-dose P
DMD#51631
4
Introduction: Ketamine [(RS)-2-(2-chlorophenyl)-2-(methylamino)cyclohexanone], is a non-
competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. It has been used as an
anesthetic agent and an adjuvant analgesic in sub-anesthetic doses to attenuate opioid
tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (White et al., 1982; Subramaniam et al.,
2004). Additionally, ketamine has displayed a rapid antidepressant effect and a
preventive effect on postoperative interleukin-6 inflammatory response in clinical
studies (Skolnick et al., 2009; Dale et al., 2012). However, these therapeutic
applications of ketamine are frequently restricted by considerable interindividual
variabilities in drug efficacy and undesired psychotomimetic effects (White et al.,
1982; Meyer et al., 2004).
In most countries, ketamine is marketed as a racemic mixture consisting of equal
amounts of (S)- and (R)-ketamine. (S)-Ketamine has an approximately 5-fold greater
NMDA affinity and 4-fold greater analgesic potency compared to (R)-ketamine, and
is associated with less psychotomimetic effects (White et al., 1980; Mathisen et al.,
1995; Ebert et al., 1997). Furthermore, the plasma clearance of (S)-ketamine is
approximately 22% faster in vivo (White et al., 1985). However, no definitive
evidence has been obtained from in vitro studies to support the stereoselective
difference in ketamine clearance that is seen in vivo (Yanagihara et al., 2001;
Portmann et al., 2010; Mossner et al., 2011).
Ketamine is predominantly metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated
N-demethylation to norketamine, a weakly active metabolite that has approximately
one-third the anesthetic activity of its parent drug in rats (White et al., 1975). Several
studies using microsomes containing cDNA-expressed human CYP enzymes have
shown the involvement of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in ketamine
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
5
N-demethylation. Among these CYP enzymes, CYP2B6 exhibited the highest
demethylation activity followed by CYP3A4 (Yanagihara et al., 2001; Hijazi and
Boulieu, 2002; Portmann et al., 2010). In human liver microsomes (HLMs),
Yanagihara et al. reported that CYP2B6 is the major enzyme responsible for (S)- and
(R)-ketamine N-demethylation (Yanagihara et al., 2001). However, this was not
confirmed by later studies, which identified that the primary contribution was from
CYP3A4 (Hijazi and Boulieu, 2002; Mossner et al., 2011).
CYP2B6 is responsible for the hepatic metabolism of several other clinically
important drugs including efavirenz, methadone, bupropion, propofol and
cyclophosphamide (Zanger et al., 2007; Turpeinen and Zanger, 2012). It exhibits
substantial interindividual variability with regard to both its catalytic activity and
level of expression, which can be partially explained by the genetic variability of the
highly polymorphic CYP2B6 gene. Among the currently described 30 alleles
(www.cypalleles.ki.se/cyp2b6.htm, accessed January 14th 2013), the CYP2B6*6 allele
is the most prevalent and clinically important variant. This variant is characterized as
a haplotype consisting of two linked nonsynonymous single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs), c.516G>T (rs3745274) and c.785A>G (rs2279343), which
reduce the expression of functional enzyme (Hofmann et al., 2008). The CYP2B6*6
allele has previously been associated with approximately 2-fold greater plasma
concentration of efavirenz (Haas et al., 2004) and a 6-fold decrease in efavirenz 8-
hydroxylation by HLMs (Xu et al., 2012). Interestingly, the influence of the
CYP2B6*6 allele on in vitro drug metabolism appears to be substrate dependent with
bupropion and efavirenz being negatively affected while cyclophosphamide 4-
hydroxylation activity was generally found to be higher for the variant (Xie et al.,
2006; Ariyoshi et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012). In contrast to these well investigated
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
6
CYP2B6 substrates, nothing is known regarding the impact of the CYP2B6*6 allele
on ketamine N-demethylation.
The aim of this study was to a) evaluate the relative contribution of CYP2B6 and
CYP3A4 to the N-demethylation of (S)- and (R)-ketamine using HLMs and expressed
CYP2B6 and 3A4 isoforms and b) assess the impact of CYP2B6*6 allelic variant on
ketamine metabolism.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Chemicals
Boric acid, bromophenol blue, cyclopentylbromide, 2-chlorobenzonitrile, ethidium
bromide, dimethyl sulfoxide BioReagent, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, DL-isocitric
acid, isocitric dehydrogenase, (R,S)-ketamine hydrochloride, (S)-ketamine
hydrochloride, sodium acetate, sodium pyrophosphate, D-(-)-tartaric acid, thioTEPA
and trizma base were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia).
Bovine serum albumin (BSA), Thermolpol reaction buffer, Taq DNA polymerase,
BsrI, BsrBI, StyI and SspI restriction enzymes and corresponding reaction buffers
were purchased from New England Biolabs (distributed by Genesearch, Arundel,
QLD, Australia). Disodium hydrogen orthophosphate, dipotassium hydrogen
orthophosphate, hydrochloric acid, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, sodium
carbonate, sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate were obtained from Ajax Chemicals
(Auburn, NSW, Australia). NADP-disodium salt, potassium chloride and
triethylamine were purchased from Merck Pty. Ltd. (Kilsyth, VIC, Australia).
Oligonucleotide primers and pUC19/HpaII DNA molecular weight marker were
obtained from GeneWorks (Thebarton, SA, Australia). Acetonitrile, diethyl ether,
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
7
hexane ethanol and sucrose were purchased from Chem-supply (Gillman, SA,
Australia). Agarose I was purchased by AMRESCO (distributed by Astral Scientific,
Gymea, NSW, Australia). Omnigel-sieve agarose was manufactured by Edwards
Instrument Co. (Narellan, NSW, Australia,). Ephedrine was obtained from Faulding
Co. Ltd. (Torrensville, SA, Australia). Butylated hydroxytoluene was from MP
Biochemicals (Irvine, CA, USA). Deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate was purchased
from Finnzymes (distributed by Genesearch). BigDye version3.0 sequencing reagents
were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Mulgrave, VIC, Australia). Maxwell® 16
tissue DNA purification kits were purchased from Promega Co. (Madison, WI, USA).
Preparation of (R)-norketamine, (S)-norketamine and (R)-ketamine
Racemic norketamine hydrochloride was prepared starting from 2-chlorobenzonitrile.
Treatment with cyclopentylmagnesium bromide in the presence of copper (I)
bromide, followed by hydrolysis, gave the cyclopentyl-(2-chlorophenyl) ketone
(Weiberth and Hall, 1987). This was brominated with N-bromosuccinimide followed
by treatment with liquid ammonia to form an imine intermediate. Thermal
rearrangement of the imine afforded (R,S)-norketamine (Figure 1). The structures of
these chemicals were confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectra using a Varian Gemini
(300 MHz) instrument. NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 solution using TMS (0
ppm) and CDCl3 (77.0 ppm) as internal standards for 1H and 13C, respectively. Optical
resolution of the enantiomers was accomplished via formation of the diastereomeric
tartrate salts (Hong and Davisson, 1982). (R)-Ketamine hydrochloride was separated
from (R,S)-ketamine hydrochloride via a modification of the published procedure for
the resolution of (S)-ketamine (Steiner et al., 2000).
Expressed proteins and monoclonal antibodies
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
8
CYP2B6.1 and CYP2B6.6 protein variants were transiently expressed in COS-1 cells
using pCMV-derived expression vectors and microsomal fractions were prepared
according to a previously described method (Lang et al., 2004). Human CYP isoforms
(CYP3A4 and CYP2B6) coexpressed with P450 reductase and cytochrome b5 (Cyt b5)
in baculovirus-infected insect cells were commercially available from BD Gentest™
(North Ryde, NSW, Australia). Monoclonal antibodies inhibitory to human CYP3A4
and to human CYP2B6, and antibodies against human CYP3A kit (WB-MAB-3A)
and antibodies against human CYP2B6 kit (WB-2B6-PEP) for immunoblotting were
also obtained from BD Gentest™.
Liver samples
Ethical approval was obtained from the Committee on the Ethics of Human
Experimentation of the University of Adelaide and Human Ethics Committee of the
Royal Adelaide Hospital. Human liver samples were donated by 23 patients
undergoing partial hepatectomy for hepatic tumours. All liver samples were
genotyped for the major CYP2B6 alleles by assays described below and 11 liver
tissues were selected based on their CYP2B6*6 genotype. Characteristics of the 11
patients were as follows: 1) all were Caucasians; 2) ages ranged from 31-77 years; 3)
six of eleven were male; 4) four patients carrying CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype, four
carrying CYP2B6*1/*6 genotype and three carrying CYP2B6*6/*6 genotype; 5) nine
patients had normal clinical chemistry and hematology prior to surgery; one patient
had high concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (3.4×upper limit of normal [ULN])
and transaminases (8×ULN), and one patient had high concentration of alanine
transaminase (13.6×ULN). All tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at � 80°C until used.
CYP2B6 genotyping
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
9
Genomic DNA was isolated from liver tissues using Maxwell® 16 instrument with
Maxwell® 16 Tissue DNA purification kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
SNPs related to CYP2B6*5 (c.1459C>T, [rs3211371]), CYP2B6*6 (c.516G>T and
c.785A>G), CYP2B6*7 (c.516G>T, c.785A>G and c.1459C>T), CYP2B6*8
(c.415A>G, [rs12721655]) and CYP2B6*13 (c.415A>G, c.516G>T and c.785A>G)
allele were screened by previously described PCR – restriction fragment length
polymorphism (RFLP) assays (Lang et al., 2004; Nakajima et al., 2007). Genotypes of
random samples were confirmed by DNA sequencing (BigDye version 3.0).
Preparations of HLMs
HLMs were prepared by a previously described differential centrifugation method
(Zanger et al., 1988). Total protein content of the microsomes was quantified using a
bicinchoninic acid (BCA) colorimetric assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Total P450 content of microsomes was measured using the carbon monoxide
difference spectrum assay (Omura and Sato, 1964). The CYP2B6 and CYP3A
contents were determined by quantitative Western blot analysis using WB-2B6-PEP
or WB-MAB-3A kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The dilutions of
primary (1°) and secondary (2°) antibodies for the detection of CYP3A and CYP2B6
in HLMs were 1° 1: 2000/2° 1:10000 and 1° 1: 1000/2° 1:1000, respectively.
Enzyme kinetics in HLMs
Norketamine formation from separate (S)- and (R)-ketamine in HLMs was carried out
as follows. All incubations were performed in duplicate at 37°C in a shaking water
bath. Incubation medium, in a final volume of 200 μl, consisted of 100 μg HLMs
protein, NADPH-regenerating system (1 mM NADP, 1 unit.ml-1 isocitrate
dehydrogenase, 5 mM DL-isocitric acid, 5 mM magnesium chloride) and 25 mM of
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
10
disodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). After a 3 min preincubation, the reaction was
initiated by the addition of various concentrations of ketamine (10 concentrations,
final concentration range of 2.5 to 2000 μM of (S)- or (R)-ketamine) and terminated
by the addition of 100 μl of saturated sodium carbonate after 30 min incubation. The
mixture was then spiked with 15 μl of 50 μg/ml of ephedrine (internal standard).
Metabolites were extracted with 4 ml of 70:30 v/v hexane:ether for 20 min and back
extracted with 100 μl of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid after centrifugation at 2000×g for 10
min. The organic layer of the mixture was then aspirated and 50 μl of the residue was
injected for HPLC analysis. The NADPH-regenerating system was replaced by an
equal volume of disodium phosphate buffer in incubations with norketamine
standards. The (S)- and (R)-norketamine formations were linear with respect to
incubation time (up to 30 min), microsomal protein content (up to 200 μg) and
substrate concentration (2.5 to 2000 μM).
Enzyme kinetics in cDNA-expressed CYP enzymes and expressed CYP2B6 variants
Baculovirus-infected insect cell microsomes containing cDNA-expressed CYP2B6,
and CYP3A4 with coexpression of Cyt b5 (in a final concentration of 5 pmol) were
incubated in duplicate at five substrate concentrations for 30 min at 37°C. Each
cDNA-expressed enzyme was preincubated with NADPH-regenerating system and
disodium phosphate buffer for 3 min at 37°C before the addition of ketamine. The (S)-
and (R)-ketamine concentration ranges for the expressed CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 were
10 to 150 μM and 100 to 1500 μM, respectively. These ranges were determined
according to the average Km1 and Km2 values for the HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1
genotype.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
11
N-Demethylations of (S)- and (R)-ketamine were also examined in CYP2B6.1 and
CYP2B6.6 expressing COS-1 cell microsomes. The incubation conditions were
identical to those described above.
Inhibition studies with chemical inhibitors
The effects of chemical inhibitors selective for CYP2B6 (thioTEPA, 25 μM) and
CYP3A (troleandomycin, 25 μM) on the formation of (S)- and (R)-norketamine from
both low (equivalent to respective Km1 values for each genotype group) and high
(equivalent to respective Km2 values for each genotype group) ketamine
concentrations were studied in the 11 HLMs. The effects of chemical inhibitors at
various final concentrations (5 to 100 μM) on norketamine formation were tested. The
final concentration of each inhibitor (25 μM) was selected to optimize selective
inhibition. Stock solutions of inhibitors were prepared in 0.1 M sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4) with 5% methanol. All components of the incubation medium except
ketamine were preincubated with inhibitors or methanol control for 20 min at 37°C.
The reaction was then initiated by the addition of substrate and terminated after 30
min incubation. Norketamine formation was quantified by the HPLC assay as
described below.
Inhibition studies with monoclonal antibodies against CYPs
Monoclonal antibodies against CYP2B6 (MAB2B6) and CYP3A (MAB3A) were
used according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Antibodies (50 μg/100 μg
HLMs protein) or inhibitor-free control were preincubated with an incubation medium
containing HLMs, NADPH-regenerating system, incubation buffer and 0.5 mM Tris
buffer (pH 7.5) on ice for 20 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of (S)- or
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
12
(R)-ketamine (identical final concentrations as assays with chemical inhibitors) and
terminated after 30 min.
HPLC conditions
Norketamine formation was quantified by a HPLC assay with UV detection that was
modified from a previously reported method (Chong et al., 2009). In brief, separation
of compounds was achieved in a 3 μm C8 reverse phase column (150×4.6 mm,
LUNA, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) using a mobile phase of 15% (v/v)
acetonitrile and 0.05% triethylamine in 20 mM dipotassium phosphate (pH 3) and the
flow rate was 0.8 ml/min. The column was protected by a guard cartridge system
packed with 4×3 mm C8 SecurityGuard cartridge (Phenomenex). Analytes were
detected at 210 nm. The peak area was calculated using Shimadzu Class-VP software
(version 6.12 SP2, Shimadzu). The retention times for ketamine, norketamine and
ephedrine were 11 min, 9 min and 4 min, respectively. Norketamine formation was
quantified with calibration curves consisting of eight standards of norketamine over
the concentration range 0.5 to 200 μM. Inter-assay and intra-assay variabilities were
determined by the analysis of duplicates of quality control norketamine samples (QC)
at three different concentrations: low (2.5 μM), medium (25 μM) and high (80 μM).
The inter-assay (n = 6) and intra-assay (n = 6) precision and inaccuracy of all QC
samples were less than 10%. The precision and inaccuracy for the limit of
quantification (n = 6) were below 10%.
Data analysis
Eadie-Hofstee plots were used for analysis of enzyme kinetic data. The kinetic
parameters (Km and Vmax) were estimated by one-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model
and an user-defined two-enzyme Michaelis-Menten model (ν =
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
13
Vmax1[S]/(Km1+[S])+Vmax2[S]/(Km2+[S])) using GraphPad Prism 5 software (San
Diego, CA, USA). Goodness of fit of data was compared between the two models.
Intrinsic clearance (CLint) was calculated as Vmax/Km. Inhibition data were expressed
as a percentage of the corresponding controls. The differences in CYP protein content,
kinetic parameters and inhibitory effects on norketamine formation rate among
CYP2B6*6 genotypes were determined by Jonckheere-Terpstra test using SPSS
Statistics 19 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Correlations between CYP2B6 or CYP3A4
content and maximal norketamine formation rate were assessed by Spearman’s rank
correlation. Stereoselective differences in kinetic parameters and inhibitory effects
were analyzed by 2-tailed Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. Data are present
as median (range) (unless specified). The results were considered statistically
significant when P
DMD#51631
14
Non-linear Eadie-Hofstee plots indicated the participation of at least two enzymes in
the N-demethylation of (S)- and (R)-ketamine in HLMs (Figure 2). The two-enzyme
Michaelis-Menten model provided a much better fit to the data compared with the
single enzyme Michaelis-Menten model. The estimated values of kinetic parameters
for the high affinity/low capacity enzyme (Vmax1, Km1 and CLint1) and the low
affinity/high capacity enzyme (Vmax2, Km2 and CLint2) are listed in Table 1. The
variability in kinetic parameters amongst three CYP2B6 genotypes is shown in Table
1 and Figure 3. For (S)-ketamine, significant gene-dose effects in Km1 and CLint1
values among three genotype groups were identified (P = 0.03 and 0.008,
respectively). For (R)-ketamine, gene-dose effects in Km1, CLint1 and CLint2 values
were found (P = 0.008, 0.001 and 0.008, respectively).
The maximal formation rates (Vmax, pmol/min/mg protein) and intrinsic clearance
(CLint, ml/min/mg protein) of norketamine enantiomers by the high affinity/low
capacity enzyme were better correlated with the CYP2B6 content (Vmax: Spearman rs
= 0.7, P = 0.02 and rs = 0.56, P = 0.08 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively;
CLint: rs = 0.81, P = 0.004 and rs = 0.80, P = 0.005 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine,
respectively) compared with the CYP3A4 content (Vmax: rs = � 0.05, P = 0.90 and rs
= 0.33, P = 0.33 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively; CLint: rs = 0.19, P = 0.57
and rs = 0.37, P = 0.26 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively) (Figure 4 and
Figure 5). Conversely, the maximal norketamine formation rates and intrinsic
clearance by the low affinity/high capacity enzyme were better correlated with
CYP3A4 content (Vmax: rs = 0.55, P = 0.09 and rs = 0.39, P = 0.24 for (S)- and (R)-
norketamine, respectively; CLint: rs = 0.71, P = 0.02 and rs = 0.80, P = 0.005 for (S)-
and (R)-norketamine, respectively) but not with CYP2B6 content (Vmax: rs = 0.35, P =
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
15
0.30 and rs = 0.00, P > 0.99 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively; CLint: rs = 0.20,
P = 0.56 and rs = � 0.04, P = 0.92 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively).
There were no significant differences between (S)- and (R)-ketamine N-demethylation
observed for any kinetic parameters (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, P > 0.07).
Enzyme kinetics in cDNA-expressed CYP enzymes and expressed CYP2B6 variants
Table 2 shows the kinetic parameters of metabolism of (S)- and (R)-ketamine to
norketamine by baculovirus-infected insect cell microsomes containing cDNA-
expressed CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 coexpression of Cyt b5 and by COS-1 cell expressed
CYP2B6.1 and CYP2B6.6 protein variants. The Km values for the expressed CYP2B6
were considerably lower than those for the expressed CYP3A4. The Vmax values were
not substantially different among these three isoforms.
The average Km value determined for (S)-ketamine N-demethylation by the insect cell
expressed CYP2B6 was significantly lower than that for (R)-ketamine (P = 0.03), and
a higher average CLint value for (S)-ketamine N-demethylation (P = 0.03), but not for
the COS-1 cell expressed CYP2B6.1 protein (P = 0.69). Differences in kinetic
parameters were not apparent for the two enantiomers of ketamine with other
expressed proteins (P > 0.05).
Inhibition study
Figure 6 shows the effects of CYP2B6 and CYP3A specific chemical inhibitors and
inhibitory monoclonal antibodies on the N-demethylation of ketamine at low and high
concentrations in HLMs carrying the three different CYP2B6 genotypes. At low
ketamine concentrations (equivalent to the corresponding average Km1 values for each
CYP2B6 genotype group in HLMs kinetic assay, 20 to 80 μM), the inhibitory effects
of thioTEPA (25 μM) on norketamine formation in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
16
genotype (67% and 62% for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively) were
significantly greater than those in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*6 (39% and 35% for (S)-
and (R)-norketamine, respectively) and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes (18% for both
enantiomers) (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, P = 0.007). Troleandomycin (25 μM)
significantly inhibited (S)- and (R)-norketamine formations only in HLMs with
CYP2B6*1/*6 genotype (P = 0.002 and 0.007 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine,
respectively), with median values of percentage of inhibition less than 6%. At high
ketamine concentrations (equivalent to the corresponding Km2 values, 300 to 850 μM),
troleandomycin significantly diminished (S)- and (R)-norketamine formation by 30%
to 46% (P < 0.0001), however significant gene-dose effect on the degree of inhibition
was not observed (Jonckheere-Terpstra test, P = 0.62). ThioTEPA had no effect on
norketamine formation at these substrate concentrations (P = 0.38 and 0.50 for (S)-
and (R)-norketamine, respectively).
MAB2B6 inhibited norketamine formation at low ketamine concentrations (P <
0.0001 for both enantiomers), with a higher median percentage inhibition in HLMs
with CYP2B6*1/*1 (57% and 46% for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively)
compared to HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*6 (27% and 37% for (S)- and (R)-norketamine,
respectively) and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes (19% and 30% for (S)- and (R)-
norketamine, respectively). MAB2B6 did not cause inhibition at high ketamine
concentrations (P = 0.77 and 0.41 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively).
MAB3A4 inhibited norketamine formations by 30-50% at high substrate
concentrations (P < 0.005) but it had no effect at low substrate concentrations. A
significant gene-dose effect was not observed with MAB3A4 inhibition (P = 0.65 and
0.39 for (S)- and (R)-norketamine, respectively).
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
17
None of the four inhibitors exhibited stereoselective preference on norketamine
formation at either substrate concentration.
Discussion
The present study provides the first evidence that the CYP2B6*6 genetic variant has a
major impact on the N-demethylation of ketamine to norketamine in vitro, which is
likely due to impairment in both enzyme-substrate binding and catalytic activity. The
estimated Km values for (S)- and (R)-norketamine formation by the high affinity/low
capacity enzyme and the low affinity/high capacity enzyme in HLMs with
CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype were similar to those values for the insect cell expressed
CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, respectively. Hence the high affinity/low capacity enzyme
very likely corresponds to CYP2B6 and the low affinity/high capacity to CYP3A4.
This finding was also supported by the results of Spearman correlation analysis
between the values of Vmax or CLint and CYP protein expression. The Km values for
the high affinity/low capacity enzyme in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype were at
least 3-fold and 2.7-fold lower, respectively, than those for HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*6
and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes. Similarly, significantly lower Km values for the COS-1
cell expressed CYP2B6.1 protein compared with the CYP2B6.6 variant were
observed. These results suggest an influence of the CYP2B6*6 allele on enzyme-
ketamine binding. In addition to the increase in Km values, Vmax values for (S)- and
(R)-norketamine formation in CYP2B6.6 variant significantly decreased by 41% and
35%, respectively, compared to CYP2B6.1, despite the minor difference in CYP2B6
expression levels between the two proteins. Therefore, the genetic impact of the
CYP2B6*6 allele on Vmax values is likely attributed to an impairment in catalytic
activity rather than in enzyme expression level. In human liver microsomal assays,
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
18
however, no gene-dose effect in Vmax values was observed. This may be due to the
low level of CYP2B6 as a percentage of total hepatic CYP content, and as these Vmax
values were normalized to total microsomal CYP content, they might not accurately
reflect the influence of the mutation in norketamine formation rate. As a consequence
of the reduction in both enzyme-substrate binding and catalytic activity, intrinsic
clearance rates of ketamine enantiomers by the high affinity/low capacity enzyme
were decreased by at least 62% in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*6 genotype and 84% in
HLMs with CYP2B6*6/*6 genotype. This is consistent with the results for the COS-1
cell expressed CYP2B6 protein variants. Surprisingly, a significant gene-dose effect
of the CYP2B6*6 allele on the intrinsic clearance rates of (R)-ketamine by the low
affinity/high capacity enzyme was observed, which is possibly due to a small sample
size and large variability in CYP3A4 content between each HLMs. The impact of the
CYP2B6*6 allele on ketamine metabolism was further confirmed by inhibition assays,
where the inhibitory effect of thioTEPA and MAB2B6 on norketamine formation
from low ketamine concentrations substantially reduced in HLMs carrying
CYP2B6*1/*6 (by 40 to 50%) and CYP2B6*6/*6 genotypes (by 60 to 70%) compared
with HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype.
The CYP2B6*6 allele has been previously associated with an increase in Km values
and decrease in Vmax values for efavirenz 8-hydroxylation and bupropion 4-
hydroxylation (Xu et al., 2012). In contrast, it has also been associated with decreased
Km values for cyclophosphamide 4-hydroxylation (Ariyoshi et al., 2011). The
substrate-dependent effects of the allele on enzyme-substrate binding and catalytic
activity suggest that this influence of the CYP2B6*6 allele is more complicated than a
decrease in enzyme expression. A previous report has shown that the c.516G>T
polymorphism, one of the two nonsynonymous SNPs of the allele, induced high levels
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
19
of an alternative splicing variant that may be responsible for altered enzyme activity
(Hofmann et al., 2008). However, whether the distinct substrate-dependent genetic
impact is caused by the c.516G>T polymorphism as well as its molecular mechanism
needs to be further investigated.
Another major finding of the current study is that the human liver microsomal N-
demethylation of ketamine, at clinically relevant concentrations, is predominantly
mediated by CYP2B6. By comparison, CYP3A4 appears to be a dominant contributor
at much higher substrate concentrations. At low ketamine concentrations (20 to 80
μM) that are similar to the extrapolated peak hepatic concentration (approximately 50
μM) after an intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg of racemic ketamine for anesthesia (Hijazi
and Boulieu, 2002), substantial inhibition of (S)- and (R)-norketamine formation by
the CYP2B6 inhibitor thioTEPA and MAB2B6 but minor inhibition by
troleandomycin and MAB3A4 were found, suggesting a major participation of
CYP2B6 but not CYP3A4 in ketamine N-demethylation. The effects of CYP2B6
inhibitors on norketamine formation in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 genotype were in
good agreement with previous investigations using pooled HLMs (Yanagihara et al.,
2001; Hijazi and Boulieu, 2002; Mossner et al., 2011). At high ketamine
concentrations (300 to 850 μM), significant inhibition by troleandomycin and
MAB3A4 but not by thioTEPA or MAB2B6, indicates that the predominant CYP
isoform responsible for ketamine N-demethylation at high concentrations is more
likely to be CYP3A4.
Previous studies using inhibition assays were inconsistent and inconclusive regarding
the relative contribution of CYP3A4 to ketamine N-demethylation at clinically
relevant concentrations in HLMs. This discrepancy may be due to the selectivity of
chemical inhibitors. In the two studies that described a major role of CYP3A4 in
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
20
ketamine metabolism, the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole at 10 μM exhibited the
greatest inhibitory effects on norketamine formation from 25 μM or 50 μM of
ketamine (Hijazi and Boulieu, 2002; Mossner et al., 2011). In contrast, another
CYP3A4 inhibitor cyclosporin A and monoclonal antibodies against CYP3A4 failed
to produce any inhibition on norketamine formation (Yanagihara et al., 2001;
Mossner et al., 2011). This discrepancy may be a result of ketoconazole also being a
potent inhibitor of other CYP isoforms including CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and
CYP2D6, with the half maximal inhibitory concentration and the inhibition constant
for CYP2B6 being 2.3 μM and 1.4 μM, respectively (Perloff et al., 2009). Thus its
effects on ketamine metabolism might be not only attributed to the inhibition of
CYP3A4. In the current study, thioTEPA and troleandomycin at 25 μM were used as
selective inhibitors of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4, respectively. ThioTEPA is a CYP2B6
chemical inhibitor with the highest selectivity, while troleandomycin has not been
reported to inhibit other CYP isoforms (Turpeinen and Zanger, 2012).
Differences in kinetic parameters for two enantiomers of ketamine were only
observed in the insect cell expressed CYP2B6 isoform with coexpression of Cyt b5
but not in HLMs or COS-1 cell expressed CYP2B6 enzyme. Accordingly, our results
provide little evidence supporting the stereoselectivity in ketamine clearance that has
been reported clinically. The Km value for (R)-ketamine metabolism was 1.3-fold
higher than that for (S)-ketamine leading to an approximately 27% decrease in the
CLint value for (R)-ketamine metabolism, which is similar to the data previously
reported by Portmann et al., who examined ketamine metabolism using the same
recombinant CYP2B6 system (Portmann et al., 2010). Interestingly, the COS-1 cell
expressed CYP2B6.1 protein did not exhibit stereoselectivity in ketamine N-
demethylation. This conflicting result is possibly the consequence of the Cyt b5-
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
21
induced conformational changes on CYP2B6 protein. Although this effect on
CYP2B6 has not been reported, Cyt b5 has been associated with conformational
changes in CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 protein that can increase the collision between the
substrate and the active-oxygen species at the active site of enzyme (Perret and
Pompon, 1998; Locuson et al., 2007).
The present results are consistent with the finding of our preliminary clinical data, that
is, a significant reduction in the plasma norketamine/ketamine concentration ratio in
the CYP2B6*6 carriers (unpublished data). Although further follow-up work is
required to examine the influence of this variant of on ketamine metabolism in vivo,
our in vitro findings imply that genotyping of CYP2B6*6 allele may be useful in
estimating ketamine clearance rate and for predicting drug interactions that might be
attributed to CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 and hence may help to guide dosing decision and
establish a safer dosage regimen. As ketamine is a high hepatically cleared drug with
low (~25%) oral bioavailability, this proposal would be more relevant when ketamine
is given orally.
In conclusion, here we demonstrate that the most common allelic variant of CYP2B6
gene, CYP2B6*6, is associated with the decrease in both enzyme ketamine binding
and N-demethylation activity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report
showing the impact of a CYP2B6 genetic polymorphism on in vitro ketamine N-
demethylation. Our data also show that CYP2B6 but not CYP3A4 is the major
isoform responsible for the human liver microsomal ketamine N-demethylation at
clinically relevant concentrations. Nevertheless, the role CYP3A4 increases as
ketamine concentration rises. In addition, the ketamine metabolism to norketamine
mediated by CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 was not stereoselective.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
22
Acknowledgements:
The authors thank Mr. Joel Colvill (University of Adelaide) for assistance with HPLC assay, Dr. Daniel Barratt (University of Adelaide) for help in genotyping assays and Dr. Benjamin Lewis (Flinders University) for help in carbon monoxide difference spectrum assay.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
23
Authorship Contributions:
Participated in research design: Li, Coller, Hutchinson, Klein, Zanger and Somogyi Conducted experiments: Li Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Coller, Klein, Zanger, Stanley, Abell and Somogyi Performed data analysis: Li, Coller and Somogyi Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Li, Coller, Hutchinson, Klein, Zanger, Stanley, Abell and Somogyi
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
24
References:
Ariyoshi N, Ohara M, Kaneko M, Afuso S, Kumamoto T, Nakamura H, Ishii I, Ishikawa T, and Kitada M (2011) Q172H replacement overcomes effects on the metabolism of cyclophosphamide and efavirenz caused by CYP2B6 variant with Arg262. Drug Metab Dispos 39:2045-2048.
Chong C, Schug SA, Page-Sharp M, Jenkins B, and Ilett KF (2009) Development of a sublingual/oral formulation of ketamine for use in neuropathic pain: Preliminary findings from a three-way randomized, crossover study. Clin Drug Investig 29:317-324.
Dale O, Somogyi AA, Li Y, Sullivan T, and Shavit Y (2012) Does Intraoperative Ketamine Attenuate Inflammatory Reactivity Following Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia 115:934-943.
Ebert B, Mikkelsen Sr, Thorkildsen C, and Borgbjerg FM (1997) Norketamine, the main metabolite of ketamine, is a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist in the rat cortex and spinal cord. European Journal of Pharmacology 333:99-104.
Haas DW, Ribaudo HJ, Kim RB, Tierney C, Wilkinson GR, Gulick RM, Clifford DB, Hulgan T, Marzolini C, and Acosta EP (2004) Pharmacogenetics of efavirenz and central nervous system side effects: an Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group study. AIDS 18:2391-2400.
Hijazi Y and Boulieu R (2002) Contribution of CYP3A4, CYP2B6, and CYP2C9 isoforms to N-demethylation of ketamine in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 30:853-858.
Hofmann MH, Blievernicht JK, Klein K, Saussele T, Schaeffeler E, Schwab M, and Zanger UM (2008) Aberrant splicing caused by single nucleotide polymorphism c.516G>T [Q172H], a marker of CYP2B6*6, is responsible for decreased expression and activity of CYP2B6 in liver. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 325:284-292.
Hong SC and Davisson JN (1982) Stereochemical studies of demethylated ketamine enantiomers. J Pharm Sci 71:912-914.
Lang T, Klein K, Richter T, Zibat A, Kerb R, Eichelbaum M, Schwab M, and Zanger UM (2004) Multiple Novel Nonsynonymous CYP2B6 Gene Polymorphisms in Caucasians: Demonstration of Phenotypic Null Alleles. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 311:34-43.
Locuson CW, Wienkers LC, Jones JP, and Tracy TS (2007) CYP2C9 Protein Interactions with Cytochrome b5: Effects on the Coupling of Catalysis. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 35:1174-1181.
Mathisen LC, Skjelbred P, Skoglund LA, and Oye I (1995) Effect of ketamine, an NMDA receptor inhibitor, in acute and chronic orofacial pain. Pain 61:215-220.
Meyer S, Aliani S, Graf N, and Gottschling S (2004) Inter- and intraindividual variability in ketamine dosage in repetitive invasive procedures in children with malignancies. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 21:161-166.
Mossner LD, Schmitz A, Theurillat R, Thormann W, and Mevissen M (2011) Inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in ketamine metabolism by use of liver microsomes and specific cytochrome P450 enzymes from horses, dogs, and humans. Am J Vet Res 72:1505-1513.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
25
Nakajima M, Komagata S, Fujiki Y, Kanada Y, Ebi H, Itoh K, Mukai H, Yokoi T, and Minami H (2007) Genetic polymorphisms of CYP2B6 affect the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of cyclophosphamide in Japanese cancer patients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 17:431-445.
Omura T and Sato R (1964) The Carbon Monoxide-binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes. Journal of Biological Chemistry 239:2370-2378.
Perloff ES, Mason AK, Dehal SS, Blanchard AP, Morgan L, Ho T, Dandeneau A, Crocker RM, Chandler CM, Boily N, Crespi CL, and Stresser DM (2009) Validation of cytochrome P450 time-dependent inhibition assays: a two-time point IC50 shift approach facilitates kinact assay design. Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems 39:99-112.
Perret A and Pompon D (1998) Electron shuttle between membrane-bound cytochrome P450 3A4 and b5 rules uncoupling mechanisms. Biochemistry 37:11412-11424.
Portmann S, Kwan HY, Theurillat R, Schmitz A, Mevissen M, and Thormann W (2010) Enantioselective capillary electrophoresis for identification and characterization of human cytochrome P450 enzymes which metabolize ketamine and norketamine in vitro. J Chromatogr A 1217:7942-7948.
Skolnick P, Popik P, and Trullas R (2009) Glutamate-based antidepressants: 20 years on. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 30:563-569.
Steiner K, Gangkofner S, and Grunenwald JM (2000) Racemic separation of ketamine, Google Patents.
Subramaniam K, Subramaniam B, and Steinbrook RA (2004) Ketamine as adjuvant analgesic to opioids: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 99:482-495, table of contents.
Turpeinen M and Zanger UM (2012) Cytochrome P450 2B6: function, genetics, and clinical relevance. Drug Metabol Drug Interact 12:1-13.
Weiberth FJ and Hall SS (1987) Copper(I)-activated addition of Grignard reagents to nitriles. Synthesis of ketimines, ketones, and amines. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 52:3901-3904.
White PF, Ham J, Way WL, and Trevor AJ (1980) Pharmacology of ketamine isomers in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 52:231-239.
White PF, Johnston RR, and Pudwill CR (1975) Interaction of ketamine and halothane in rats. Anesthesiology 42:179-186.
White PF, Schuttler J, Shafer A, Stanski DR, Horai Y, and Trevor AJ (1985) Comparative pharmacology of the ketamine isomers. Studies in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 57:197-203.
White PF, Way WL, and Trevor AJ (1982) Ketamine--its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology 56:119-136.
Xie H, Griskevicius L, Stahle L, Hassan Z, Yasar U, Rane A, Broberg U, Kimby E, and Hassan M (2006) Pharmacogenetics of cyclophosphamide in patients with hematological malignancies. Eur J Pharm Sci 27:54-61.
Xu C, Ogburn ET, Guo Y, and Desta Z (2012) Effects of the CYP2B6*6 allele on catalytic properties and inhibition of CYP2B6 in vitro: implication for the mechanism of reduced efavirenz metabolism and other CYP2B6 substrates in vivo. Drug Metab Dispos 40:717-725.
Yanagihara Y, Kariya S, Ohtani M, Uchino K, Aoyama T, Yamamura Y, and Iga T (2001) Involvement of CYP2B6 in n-demethylation of ketamine in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 29:887-890.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
26
Zanger UM, Klein K, Saussele T, Blievernicht J, Hofmann MH, and Schwab M (2007) Polymorphic CYP2B6: molecular mechanisms and emerging clinical significance. Pharmacogenomics 8:743-759.
Zanger UM, Vilbois F, Hardwick JP, and Meyer UA (1988) Absence of hepatic cytochrome P450bufI causes genetically deficient debrisoquine oxidation in man. Biochemistry 27:5447-5454.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
27
Footnotes
a) Financial support: This work was supported by University of Adelaide, School of
Medical Sciences funding, Adelaide Graduate Fee Scholarship; the Australian
Research Council Australian Research Fellowship [DP110100297]; FTT Fricker
Research Fellowship [Medical Endowment Funds, University of Adelaide]; the
Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany.
b) Parts of this work were previously presented at the 19th International Symposium
on Microsomes and Drug Oxidations and 12th European ISSX Meeting (June 17–21,
2012, Noordwijk aan Zee, the Netherlands) and the Joint ASCEPT-APSA 2012
Conference (December 2–5, 2012, Sydney, Australia)
c) Corresponding author for reprint request: Yibai Li,
Address: Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Level 5, Medical
School North, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5005
Email: [email protected]
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
28
Figure legends
Figure 1. Scheme of (R,S)-norketamine synthesis. Intermediates: 1) cyclopentyl-(2-
chlorophenyl) ketone; 2) α-Bromo-(2-chlorophenyl)cyclopentyl ketone; 3) 1-[(2-
chlorophenyl)iminomethyl]cyclopentanol; 4) (R,S)-norketamine hydrochloride.
Reaction conditions: a) Magnesium, iodine crystals, anhydrous ether, 1 h; b) 2-
chlorobenzonitrile, copper (I) bromide, anhydrous ether, 16 h; c) N-
bromosuccinimide, p-toluenesulfonic acid, dichloromethane, 6 h; d) liquid ammonia, -
78 °C, 18 h; e) isopropanol, reflux, 5 days.
Figure 2. Example of kinetics of (R)- and (S)-norketamine formation by HLM
(HLM#44, CYP2B6*1/*1). The data were best fitted using a modified two-enzyme
Michaelis-Menten model. Each value represents the mean ± S.D.
Figure 3. Influence of CYP2B6*6 allelic variant on kinetic parameters of (R)- and (S)-
ketamine N-demethylation in HLMs by the high affinity/low capacity enzyme
(A,B,C) and by the low affinity/high capacity enzyme (D,E,F). Line represents
median. Gene-dose effects between CYP2B6 genotype and values of kinetic
parameters were analyzed by Jonckheere-Terpstra test (P-values are provided under
figures)
Figure 4. Spearman’s rank correlation between the maximal formation rate of
norketamine enantiomers and CYP2B6 or CYP3A4 content (n = 11). A & B,
correlation between Vmax1 (maximal formation rate of (S)- and (R)-norketamine by the
high affinity/low capacity enzyme) and CYP content. C&D, correlation between
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
29
Vmax2 (maximal formation rate of (S)- and (R)-norketamine by the low affinity/high
capacity enzyme) and CYP content.
Figure 5. Spearman’s rank correlation between intrinsic clearance values of
norketamine enantiomers and CYP2B6 or CYP3A4 content (n = 11). A & B,
correlation between CLint1 (intrinsic clearance values of (S)- and (R)-norketamine by
the high affinity/low capacity enzyme) and CYP content. C&D, correlation between
CLint2 (intrinsic clearance values of (S)- and (R)-norketamine by the low affinity/high
capacity enzyme) and CYP content.
Figure 6. Effect of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 inhibitors on norketamine formation from
both low and high ketamine concentrations in HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 (n = 4),
CYP2B6*1/*6 (n = 4) and CYP2B6*6/*6 (n = 3) genotypes. Low substrate
concentrations were equivalent to the relative Km1 values, high substrate
concentrations were equivalent to the relative Km2 values. TAO, troleandomycin,
MAB-3A, monoclonal antibody against CYP3A, MAB-2B6, monoclonal antibody
against CYP2B6. Results represent the mean ± S.D. # significant inhibition P < 0.05,
** significant gene-dose effect on inhibitory effects among three genotype groups P <
0.01.
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
DMD#51631
30
Tables:
Table 1. Two-enzyme Michaelis-Menten kinetic parameters for norketamine formation from (S)- and (R)-ketamine by the high affinity/low
capacity enzyme (Vmax1, Km1 and CLint1) and the low affinity/high capacity enzyme (Vmax2, Km2 and CLint2) in 11 HLMs with CYP2B6*1/*1 (n =
4), *1/*6 (n = 4) and *6/*6 genotypes (n = 3). CLint = Vmax/Km, data are medians (range).
Vmax1 Km1 CLint1 Vmax2 Km2 CLint2
(pmol/min/pmol CYP) (μM) (ml/min/pmol CYP) (pmol/min/pmol CYP) (μM) (ml/min/pmol CYP)
(S)-ketamine
*1/*1 3.9 (2.1-12) 28 (12-43) 226 (68-281) 31 (11-43) 471 (375-1673) 52 (22-79)
*1/*6 7.4 (5.3-9.4) 86 (63-139) 84 (51-121) 16 (5.7-20) 374 (213-532) 36 (27-51)
*6/*6 2.6 (1.9-4.7) 78# (71-85) 37# (24-56) 15 (12-26) 934 (638-969) 19 (16-27)
(R)-ketamine
*1/*1 3.3 (2.3-8.1) 20 (6.9-42) 228 (108-333) 21 (13-71) 339 (230-1475) 64 (32-82)
*1/*6 6.3 (4.6-9.5) 69 (52-98) 98 (71-105) 19 (15-23) 612 (400-825) 36 (18-46)
*6/*6 2.0 (1.9-4.1) 74 (66-91) 26 (22-61) 5.7 (4.9-23) 840 (621-1046) 8# (5.5-27)
# significant gene-dose effects among the three genotype groups, Jonckheere-Terpstra test, p
DMD#51631
31
Table 2. Single-enzyme kinetic parameters for the N-demethylation of (S)- and (R)-ketamine in insect cell expressed CYP2B6 and CYP3A4
enzymes and COS-1 cell expressed CYP2B6 variants. CLint = Vmax/Km, data are medians (range).
Baculovirus-insect cell expressed CYP isoforms with coexpression of Cyt b5
(S)-ketamine (R)-ketamine
Vmax Km CLint Vmax Km CLint
(pmol/min/pmol CYP) (μM) (ml/min/pmol CYP) (pmol/min/pmol CYP) (μM) (ml/min/pmol CYP)
CYP2B6 88 (83-90) 51 (50-54) 1752 (1567-1797) 92 (68-101) 70† (51-78) 1278† (1248-1415)
CYP3A4 100 (99-132) 453 (324-949) 221 (139-305) 107 (105-111) 536 (447-772) 199 (144-234)
COS-1 cell expressed CYP2B6 variants
CYP2B6.1a 75 (68-86) 50 (38-63) 1466 (1374-1862) 81 (76-83) 53 (48-59) 1519 (1380-1592)
CYP2B6.6b 47∆ (45-49) 71∆ (64-79) 663∆ (626-711) 49∆ (46-50) 69∆ (66-76) 699∆ (647-751)
∆ significant difference compared to corresponding values for CYP2B6.1 group Mann-Whitney U test, p
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
100
200
300
Ketamine conc. (µM)
Nor
keta
min
e fo
rmat
ion
rate
(pm
ol/m
in/p
mol
CY
P)(S)-ketamine (R)-ketamine
0.00 0.03 0.06 0.090
5
10
15
V/S
V
Eadie-Hofstee plot
Figure 2
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
0
5
10
15V
max
1 (p
mol
/min
/pm
ol C
YP)
*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6(S)-ketamine, P = 0.51(R)-ketamine, P = 0.41
A
Figure 3
0
50
100
150
Km
1
(µM
)
*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6(S)-ketamine, P = 0.03(R)-ketamine, P = 0.008
B
0
100
200
300
400
CLin
t1(m
l/min
/pm
ol C
YP)
*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6(S)-ketamine, P = 0.008(R)-ketamine, P = 0.001
C
0
20
40
60
80
Vm
ax2
(pm
ol/m
in/p
mol
CY
P)
*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6(S)-ketamine, P = 0.24(R)-ketamine, P = 0.24
D
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Km
2
(µM
)*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6
(S)-ketamine, P = 0.41(R)-ketamine, P = 0.10
E
0
20
40
60
80
100
CLin
t2(m
l/min
/pm
ol C
YP)
*1/*1 *1/*6 *6/*6(S)-ketamine, P = 0.13(R)-ketamine, P = 0.008
F
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.00
50
100
150
200
Vmax1 of (R)-norketamine formation (nmol/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.56, P = 0.06r = 0.33, P = 0.33
B
Figure 4
0 2 4 6 80
50
100
150
200
Vmax2 of (S)-norketamine formation (nmol/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.35, P = 0.30r = 0.55, P = 0.09
C
0 2 4 6 80
50
100
150
200
Vmax2 of (R)-norketamine formation (nmol/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.00, p > 0.99r = 0.39, p = 0.24
D
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50
30
60
90
120
150
Vmax1 of (S)-norketamine formation (nmol/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
r = 0.70, P = 0.02r = -0.05, P = 0.90
ACYP3A4CYP2B6
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
CLint1 of (S)-norketamine formation(ml/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
0 15 30 45 600
50
100
150
200
250CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.81, P = 0.004r = 0.19, P = 0.57
A
Figure 5
CLint1 of (R)-norketamine formation(ml/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
0 50 100 150 2000
50
100
150
200
250CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.80, P = 0.005r = 0.37, P = 0.26
B
CLint2 of (S)-norketamine formation(ml/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
0 5 10 15 200
50
100
150
200
250CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = 0.20, P = 0.56r = 0.71, P = 0.02
C
CLint2 of (R)-norketamine formation(ml/min/mg protein)
CYP
cont
ent
(pm
ol C
YP/
mg
prot
ein)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.50
50
100
150
200
250CYP2B6CYP3A4
r = -0.04, P = 0.92r = 0.80, P = 0.005
D
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/
-20 0 20 40 60 80 100
% Inhibition
(S)-ketamine (R)-ketamine
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
Low substrate concentrations
Thio-TEPA# (25 µM)
MAB2B6# (0.5 µg/1 µg
HLM)
Troleandomycin (25 µM)
MAB3A4 (0.5 µg/1 µg
HLM)
**
**
A
Figure 6-20 0 20 40 60 80 10
0
% Inhibition
(S)-ketamine (R)-ketamine
High substrate concentrations*1/*1*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
*1/*1
*1/*6
*6/*6
Thio-TEPA (25 µM)
MAB2B6 (0.5 µg/1 µg
HLM)
Troleandomycin# (25 µM)
MAB3A4# (0.5 µg/1 µg
HLM)
B
This article has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version.DMD Fast Forward. Published on April 2, 2013 as DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.051631
at ASPE
T Journals on M
ay 31, 2021dm
d.aspetjournals.orgD
ownloaded from
http://dmd.aspetjournals.org/