+ All Categories
Home > Food > The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Date post: 22-Feb-2017
Category:
Upload: kelsey-zook
View: 18 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling PRESENTED BY: KELSEY ZOOK WILKES UNIVERSITY MBA 592
Transcript
Page 1: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

The Economics of Genetically ModifiedFood Labeling

PRESENTED BY: KELSEY ZOOKWILKES UNIVERSITY

MBA 592

Page 2: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Agenda• Introduction

• Food Labeling Legislationo Historyo Current Regulationo Contributing Agencies

• Producerso Industry Reactions

• Consumerso Millennial Consumer Impacts

• Economic Analysis

• Challenges & Opportunities

Page 3: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

IntroductionGenetically Modified Foods:

oOrganisms in which the genetic material (DNA) has been altered in a way that would not occur naturally

• Consumers calling for increased transparency in food industry

• Voluntary vs. Mandatory GM food labeling

• Labeling = Differentiation and Communicationo Food labeling functions as the primary means of communication between producers and

consumers

Page 4: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Food Labeling Legislation

Pure Food & Drugs Act

1906

Federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act

1938

Fair Packaging & Labeling Act

1966

Nutrition Labeling & Education Act

1990

Page 5: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Current Legislation Safe & Accurate Food Labeling Act• Introduced to U.S. Senate, March 2015

• Preempts all state laws relating to mandatory labeling of GM productso Standards for uniform, national GM labeling

- Utilizes QR codes, websites, phone numberso Certification process for non-GM foods

• Trade groups vs. Advocacy groups

Page 6: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Production• United States = largest global producer of GM cropso Corn, Soybeans, Rapeseed, Cotton are the most common

o In “Corn Belt” States as much as 90% of corn & soybeans planted are GMO

• Consolidation among GM seed producers

o Top 10 GM Seed producing firms = 73% market share in 2013

Page 7: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Producer Reactions• Mandatory Labeling is Inherently misleading

o Concerns with mandatory GM labeling related to economics not safety

• Some producers are taking matters into their own hands

Campbell Company Example

- Beginning January 2016, voluntarily labeling all GM food products

PepsiCo’s Tropicana Example

- Manufacturer choosing to label some products for GM ingredients is a marketing ploy

Page 8: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Consumers• 93% of American consumers want to know if food products contain GM ingredients

• 56% of American adult consumers seek nutritional information on food labels

• 1.3 million American consumers have signed a petition – demanding FDA mandates GM food labeling

“It [GM labeling] will encourage hysterical reaction and discourage thoughtfuldeliberation about the risks posed by biotechnology”

- - Johnathan Frenzen (Clinical Professor of Marketing, University of Chicago)

Page 9: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Millennial Consumers• Consumers born after 1980

• Account for greatest percentage of food buying market share

• Mintel reports, 2/3 of Millennials pay close attention to food labels

“Real - Searchers”o Millennials are quick to fact-check

“Ultimate Day Traders”o willing to trade up or down, depending on preferences

Page 10: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Millennial Consumers Continued…• Price Elasticity increases as uniqueness, authenticity, & meaningfulness increases for product

• Organic food purchases increasing among Millennials

o Among Household leaders purchasing organic, more than 52% are now Millennials

• Social Media Effect

Page 11: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Economic Analysis of GM Food Labeling

“An Economic Analysis of Nanofood Labeling” By: Tran, Yiannaka, & Giannakas

of University of Nebraska-Lincoln

• Consumers willing to pay more as a means of avoiding risk

o Participating consumers support argument that GM labeling results in risks & benefits

• Adverse consumer response = slower adaptation

• Cost Effect vs. Preference Effect Under Mandatory Labeling Regime

o Increased cost for consumers

o When Preference & Cost Effect work in same direction more consumers switch to substitute product

Page 12: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Economic Analysis Continued…

Tran, V. T., Yiannaka, A., & Giannakas, K. (2014). An economic of nanofood labeling. American Agricultural Economics Association.

Page 13: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Consumer Impacts of GM Labeling• Cost Effect > Preference Effect:o Price of GM Foods will increaseo Consumers will switch to substitute for GM food product

• Preference Effect > Cost Effect:o Consumers more averse to GM food productso Price of GM Foods will increase

• Certainty Effect > Stigma Effecto Consumers who prefer GM food products

Page 14: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Producer Impacts• For GM Food Producers/Manufacturers

o Consumer preference decreases Leftward shift of demand curve

o Leading to Decreased Profit Margins

- Increased cost of production

- Decreased consumer demand

• For Organic Food Producers/Manufacturers

o Increased demand & Profits

Page 15: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Conclusions: Challenges• Producerso Changing Consumer Preferences

o Conforming to future GM Labeling Legislation

• Consumerso Unknown labeling methods

o Continued concerns with Transparency

• Legislation/Regulatoryo International Trade

- Anti GM Food Legislation in importing countries

- Cultural Differences (Hofstede’s Dimensions)

Page 16: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

Conclusions: Opportunities• Producerso Organic food markets

o Capitalizing on Millennial eating habits

• Consumerso USDA Certified Organic foodso Additional information about food through Safe & Accurate Food Labeling Act

• Legislation/Regulatoryo Solving Food Insecurity

o Possible solution to domestic & international “Food Deserts”

Page 17: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

References (2000). U.S. farmers losing domestic markets while Japan sets new restrictions for GMO corn imports. PR Newswire. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2002). How consumers process information at heart of debate over labeling of genetically modified foods. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2014). Taking sides: Mandatory GMO labeling. Supermarket News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2015). Should companies be required to label genetically modified foods? Backers of the idea say consumers deserve to know what’s in the food they eat. Critics say labeling is a ploy to make consumers worry. Wall Street Journal (Online). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2015). Trade groups applaud House passage of GMO bill. Supermarket News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2016). GMO labeling: The great debate. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2016). Just Label It chairman says PepsiCo’s Tropicana ‘non-GMO’seal is “disingenuous”. Business Wire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2016). Millennials and organic: A winning combination. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2016). Packaged facts: Congress decides on GMO labeling, but will consumers be happy?: 56% of U.S. adults seek information and transparency on food & beverage labels. PR Newswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

(2016). United States: U.S. Congress passes bill on GMO food labeling. Asia News Monitor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Amos, C., Pentina, I., Hawkins, T. G., & Davis, N. (2014). “Natural” labeling and consumers’ sentimental pastoral notion. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23.4/5, 268-281. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Page 18: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

ReferencesFairfield-Sonn, J.W. (2016). Political economy of GMO foods. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 17.1, 60-70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomlete/.

Frazao, E., & Lynch, L. (1991). Food labeling regulations changing. FoodReview, 14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Golan, E., Kuchler, F., & Krissoff, B. (2007). Do food labels make a difference?...sometimes. Economic Research Service – USDA, 5, 10-17. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Haddon, H. (2016). U.S. Senate approves legislation requiring GMO labels: GMO label bill to be considered by House. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Harrison, R. W., McLennon, E. (2004). Analysis of consumer preferences for biotech labeling formats. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 36.1, 159-171. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

H. Hutt, P. B. (1993). FDA regulation of product claims in food labeling. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 12. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Landi, H.(2015). Labels under scrutiny. Beverage World, 134. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Premanandh, J. (2011). Global consensus – need \of the hour for genetically modified organisms (GMO) labeling. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 17.1, 37-44. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Radke, A. (2016). How the beef industry can capitalize on millennial meat buying habits. Beef. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Shearer, P. S. (2016). GMO labeling bill passes Senate. National Hog Farmer. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Spencer, J. (2016). Bill outlawing state GMO labeling laws passes Senate committee. TCA Regional News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Starzee, B. (2015). Food manufacturers applaud food labeling act, Long Island Business News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Page 19: The Economics of Genetically Modified Food Labeling

References Tran, V. T., Yiannaka, A., & Giannakas, K. (2014). An economic of nanofood labeling. American Agricultural Economics Association. Retrieved from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu.

Trotter, G. (2016). GMO labeling debate puts food industry on defensive. TCA Regional News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Vigani, M., Raimondi, V., & Olper, A. (2012). International trade and endogenous standards: the case of GMO regulations. World Trade Review, 11.3. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Vogt, W. (2016). Taking on the GMO labeling question. Farm Industry News. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Zhao, L., Gu, H., Chengyan, Y., & Ahlstrom, D. (2013). Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. Food Policy, 42, 58-70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.wilkes.edu/abicomplete/.

Zook, K. “Food Buying Habits: Organic versus Conventional.” MBA 512. Wilkes University, 2016. https://voicethread.com/myvoice/#thread/7857465/42984220/43840311.


Recommended