i
THE EFFECT OF NOTE TAKING ON LISTENING COMPREHENSION
OF THE THIRD SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA
THESIS
BY
NORMISLONA AMALIA
NIM 1201120797
STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION
STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
2017 M / 1439 H
ii
THE EFFECT OF NOTE TAKING ON LISTENING COMPREHENSION
OF THE THIRD SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH
DEPARTMENT AT IAIN PALANGKA RAYA
THESIS
Presented to
State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya
in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Sarjana in English Language Education
BY
NORMISLONA AMALIA
NIM 1201120797
STATE ISLAMIC INSTITUTE OF PALANGKA RAYA
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE EDUCATION
STUDY PROGRAM OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
2017 M / 1439 H
iii
iv
v
vi
MOTTO AND DEDICATION
“Allah doesn’t change the state of a clan, so they change the circumstances
that exist on their own.”
(Qs. Ar Ra’d: 11)
This thesis is dedicated to:
My beloved Father Mr. Syamsudin, SE and Mother Mrs.
Suteraningsih for their valuable endless prayer sacrifice
and support. My beloved brother Maulana Al Akmal. My
senior Andrean and my beloved friends for their support.
vii
ABSTRACT
Amalia, Normislona. 2017. The Effect of Note Taking on Listening
Comprehension of The Third Semester Students of English Department at
IAIN Palangka Raya. Thesis, Department of Language Education, Faculty of
Teacher Training and Education, State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya.
Advisor (I) M. Zaini Miftah, M. Pd., (II) Aris Sugianto, M.Pd.
Keywords: Effect, Teaching, Listening Comprehension, Note Taking.
The main purpose of the study was to find out whether the students whom
taught using Note Taking gain better scores than the students whom taught
without Note Taking at third semester students in Interpretive Listening class at
IAIN Palangka Raya. The type of this study was quasi-experimental, and the
writer used quantitative approach in finding out to answer of the problem, the data
collecting techniques used test and documentation.
There were two classes of study namely B class as experimental group and
C class as control group with the total number students which B class 25 students
and C class 25 students. The sample of study was determined using cluster
sampling technique. Both groups were given pretest before treatment. Then, the
students of experiment group were taught by using Note Taking and control group
was taught without using Note Taking. Finally, the writer gave posttest to both
groups. The normality of the test was pretest and posttest of the experiment group
in Kolmogorov-Smirnov was higher than level of significance Alpha used or r =
0.830> 0.05 (pretest) and r = 0.356 > 0.05 (posttest) and the normality of the test
was pretest and posttest of control group in Kolmogorov-Smirnov was higher than
level of significance Alpha used or r = 0.393> 0.05 (pretest) and r = 0.349 > 0.05
(posttest) so the distribution are normal. The homogeneity from pretest of
experiment group and pretest of control group on homogeneity of variances in sig
column is known that p-value was 0.351. The data in this study fulfilled
homogeneity since the p value is higher 0.351> 0.05. The homogeneity from
posttest of experiment group and posttest of control group on homogeneity of
variances in sig column is known that p-value was 0.372. The data in this study
fulfilled homogeneity since the p value is higher 0.372 > 0.05.
In the result of hypothesis was using calculation of T-test with SPSS 18.0
The result of t-test which calculated by using SPSS 18.0 found the value of
(tobserved) was greater than (ttable) at 1% and 5% significance level or
2.01>3.37>2.68. it was interpreted that alternative hypothesis (Ha) stated that
students who were taught listening comprehension using Note Taking gain better
scores than the students who were taught without using Note Taking was accepted
and null hypothesis (Ho), students who were taught listening comprehension
using Note Taking did not gain better scores than the students who were taught
listening comprehension without using Note Taking was rejected. It meant that
using Note Taking in teaching listening comprehension gives effect on the
students’ listening comprehension at the third semester students of IAIN Palangka
Raya.
viii
ABSTRAK
Amalia, Normislona. 2017. Pengaruh dari Note Taking Terhadap Pemahaman
Mendengarkan Siswa Semester III Jurusan Bahasa Inggris di IAIN Palangka
Raya. Skripsi, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu
Keguruan, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya. Pembimbing: (I) M.
Zaini Miftah, M.Pd., (II) Aris Sugianto, M.Pd.
Kata kunci: Pengaruh, Pengajaran, Kemampuan Mendengarkan, Note Taking.
Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah siswa
yang diajar menggunakan Note Taking mendapatkan nilai yang lebih baik
daripada siswa yang diajar tanpa Note Taking pada siswa semester tiga kelas
Interpreting Listening di IAIN Palangka Raya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kuasi
eksperimental, dan penulis menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif untuk
mengetahui jawaban masalah, teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes dan
dokumentasi.
Ada dua kelas studi yaitu kelas B sebagai kelompok eksperimen dan kelas
C sebagai kelompok kontrol dengan jumlah siswa kelas B kelas 25 dan kelas C 25
siswa. Sampel penelitian ditentukan dengan teknik cluster sampling. Kedua
kelompok diberi pretest sebelum treatment. Kemudian, siswa kelompok
eksperimen diajar dengan menggunakan Note Taking dan kelompok kontrol
diajarkan tanpa menggunakan Note Taking. Akhirnya, penulis memberikan
posttest kepada kedua kelompok. Normalitas tes dari pretest dan posttest
kelompok eksperimen di Kolmogorov-Smirnov lebih tinggi dari pada tingkat
signifikansi Alpha yang digunakan atau r = 0,830> 0,05 (pretest) dan r = 0,356>
0,05 (posttest) dan normalitas tes dari pretest dan posttest kelompok kontrol di
Kolmogorov-Smirnov lebih tinggi dari pada tingkat signifikansi Alpha yang
digunakan atau r = 0,393> 0,05 (pretest) dan r = 0,349> 0,05 (posttest) sehingga
distribusinya normal. Homogenitas dari pretest kelompok eksperimen dan pretest
kelompok kontrol pada homogenitas varians pada kolom sig diketahui bahwa nilai
p adalah 0,351. Data dalam penelitian ini memenuhi homogenitas karena nilai p
lebih tinggi 0,351> 0,05. Homogenitas dari posttest kelompok eksperimen dan
posttest kelompok kontrol pada homogenitas varians pada kolom sig diketahui
bahwa nilai p adalah 0,372. Data dalam penelitian ini memenuhi homogenitas
karena nilai p lebih tinggi 0,372> 0,05.
Hasil hipotesis menggunakan perhitungan T-test dengan SPSS 18.0 Hasil
uji t yang dihitung dengan menggunakan SPSS 18.0 menemukan nilai (tobserved)
lebih besar dari (ttabel) pada tingkat signifikansi 1% dan 5% atau 2,01. > 3,37>
2,68. Diinterpretasikan bahwa hipotesis alternatif (Ha) menyatakan bahwa siswa
mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar dengan menggunakan Note Taking
mendapatkan nilai yang lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajar tanpa menggunakan
Note Taking diterima dan hipotesis nol (Ho), siswa yang mengajarkan
pemahaman mendengar menggunakan Note Taking tidak mendapatkan nilai yang
lebih baik daripada siswa yang mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar tanpa
menggunakan Note Taking ditolak. Artinya, menggunakan Note Taking dalam
ix
mengajarkan pemahaman mendengar memberi efek pada pemahaman
mendengarkan siswa pada siswa semester III IAIN Palangka Raya.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The writer would like to express his sincere gratitude to Allah SWT., for the
blessing bestowed in his whole life particularly during the thesis writing without
which this thesis would not have come to its final form. Sholawat and salam
always be bestowed to the last prophet Muhammad SAW., having shown us the
role of life to make our life true.
Her appreciation is addressed to:
1. Dr. Ibnu Elmi A.S. Pelu, S.H., M.H., as the Director of IAIN Palangka Raya
for his direction and permission of conducting this thesis;
2. Dean of Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of the State Islamic
Institute of Palangka Raya, Drs. Fahmi, M.Pd., for his invaluable assistance
both in academic and administrative matters.
3. Vice Dean in Academic Affairs, Dra. Hj. Raudhatul Jennah, M.Pd., for her
invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters.
4. Chair of Department of Language Education, Santi Erliana, M.Pd., for her
invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters.
5. Secretary of Department of Language Education, M. Zaini Miftah, M.Pd.,
for his invaluable assistance both in academic and administrative matters.
6. Thesis advisors, M. Zaini Miftah,M. Pd. and Aris Sugianto, M.Pd., for their
generous advice, valuable guidance and elaborated correction during their
busy time to the completion of her thesis.
x
7. Hesty Widiastuty, M. Pd and Novanie Sulastri, M. Pd the lecturer of
Interpretive Listening Class at IAIN Palangka Raya, for the time and
opportunity that has been given during the accomplishment of this thesis.
8. Both the members of the board of examiners, for their corrections,
comments and suggestions which are profitable to the accomplishing of this
thesis.
9. All lecturers of Study Program of English Education from whom she got in-
depth knowledge of English and English teaching.
10. Her beloved parents, Mr. Syamsudin, SE and Mrs. Suteraningsih, for their
moral support and endless prayer so that she is able to finish her study. May
Allah SWT bless them all. Amin.
Palangka Raya, November , 2017
The writer,
Normislona Amalia
NIM. 1201120797
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER ............................................................................................................ i
COVER (second page) ..................................................................................... ii
ADVISOR APPROAL ..................................................................................... iii
THESIS APPROAL ......................................................................................... iv
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ........................................................................ v
DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP ............................................................. vi
ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT (Indonesian) ................................................................................ viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................. ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................. xi
LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................... xiv
LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................... xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES .................................................................................. xviii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................... xix
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ..................................................... 1
B. Problem of the Study ........................................................... 7
C. Objective of the Study ......................................................... 7
D. Hypotheses of the Study ..................................................... 8
E. Variable of the Study .......................................................... 8
F. Scope and Limitation .......................................................... 8
G. Significance of the Study .................................................... 9
H. Definition of Key Terms ..................................................... 10
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Related studies .................................................................... 12
B. Listening .............................................................................. 16
1. Nature of Listening ....................................................... 16
2. Kinds of Listening ......................................................... 19
3. Teaching Listening Model ............................................ 20
4. Listening Problem ......................................................... 22
xii
5. Teacher’s Solutions to Solve the Problem .................... 25
a. The Massage............................................................ 25
b. The Speakers ........................................................... 26
c. Physical Setting ....................................................... 26
d. The Listener ............................................................ 27
C. Note Taking Strategy .......................................................... 28
1. Definition of Note Taking ............................................. 28
2. The Effects of Note Taking ........................................... 29
3. Teaching using Note taking .......................................... 29
4. Procedure of Guide Note Taking Method ..................... 31
5. Procedure of Teaching Listening Through Note Taking
Strategy ......................................................................... 31
6. The Functions and Benefit of Note Taking ................... 32
a. The Functions of Note Taking ................................ 32
b. Benefit of Note Taking............................................ 34
c. Solution to Common Problem in Taking ................ 36
7. Symbols of Note Taking ............................................... 37
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Method ................................................................. 40
1. Research Type ............................................................... 40
2. Research Design ............................................................ 40
3. Approach ....................................................................... 43
B. B. Population and Sample ........................................................ 43
1. Population of the Study ................................................. 43
2. Sample of the Study ...................................................... 44
C. Instrument of the Study ....................................................... 45
1. Research Instrument ...................................................... 45
a. Test Type ................................................................. 45
b. Documentation ........................................................ 46
2. Instrument Try Out ........................................................ 46
D. Research Instrument Validity .............................................. 47
D. E. Research Instrument Reliability .......................................... 50
F. Data Collection Procedure ................................................... 52
G. Data Analysis Procedure ..................................................... 52
CHAPTER IV DATA FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
A. The presentation of data .................................................. 57
1. Distribution of pretest score of experiment group ... 57
2. Distribution of pretest score of control group .......... 66
xiii
3. Distribution of posttest score of experiment group .. 74
4. Distribution of posttest score of control group ........ 82
B. Testing Normality and Homogeneity .............................. 90
1. Testing Normality .................................................... 91
2. Testing Homogeneity ............................................... 93
C. Testing Hypothesis using t-test ..................................... 95
D. Testing hypothesis using SPSS Program ...................... 99
E. Interpretation................................................................. 101
F. Discussion ..................................................................... 102
CHAPTER V CLOSING
A. Conclusion .................................................................... 105
B. Suggestion .................................................................... 106
REFERENCES
APPENDICES
