THE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM THINKER MODEL IN
TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION
THESIS
Submitted as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Attainment of
a Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Education Department
By
Name : Dwi Putri Puspitasari
NIM : 2012850050
ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF JAKARTA
2017
i
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF JAKARTA FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
Thesis January 2017
Dwi Putri Puspitasari (2012850050)
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM THINKER MODEL IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION
xvi + 61 pages., 11 tables, 4 figures, 19 appendices
ABSTRACT
The objective of this research is to know the effectiveness of Quantum Thinker model on Students‘ Reading Comprehension at tenth grade students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta. The research used quantitative method with quasi experimental design by applying pre-test and post-test. In this research, the writer used two classes as experimental and control classes. The sample in this study is class X IPS (experimental class) and class X MIPA 1 (control class). Each of the class is occupied by 60 students. The data was collected by giving pre-test and post-test as the instruments. The writer used t-test formula to analyze the difference of students‘ scores in experimental and control classes. Based on the data obtained from the study that t-observation (to) is 2.079, meanwhile t-table (tt) with df 56 in significance level 5% is 1.672. So, based on calculation the writer find that to is higher than tt (2.079 > 1.672). It means that is data has the influence significant, with the result Ho is rejected and Ha was accepted. This finding reveals that Quantum Thinker is an effective model in teaching students‘ reading comprehension.
Keywords : Effectiveness, Quantum Thinker Model, Students’ Reading Comprehension
References 27 (1986 – 2016)
ii
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH JAKARTA FAKULTAS ILMU PENDIDIKAN PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Skripsi Januari 2017
Dwi Putri Puspitasari (2012850050)
EFEKTIFITAS MODEL QUANTUM THINKER DALAM MENGAJAR PEMAHAMAN MEMBACA
xvi + 61 halaman., 11 tabel, 4 ilmu hitung, 19 lampiran
ABSTRAK
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektivitas model Quantum Thinker pada Pemahaman Membaca Siswa di kelas sepuluh SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan desain kuasi eksperimental dengan menerapkan pre-test dan post-test. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan dua kelas sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X IPS (kelas eksperimen) dan kelas X MIPA 1 (kelas kontrol). Masing-masing kelas ditempati oleh 60 siswa. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan memberikan pre-test dan post-test sebagai instrumen. Penulis menggunakan rumus t-test untuk menganalisis perbedaan skor siswa di kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan data yang diperoleh dari penelitian bahwa t-observation (to) adalah 2.079, sementara itu t-tabel (tt) dengan df 56 pada tarif signifikan 5% adalah 1.672. Jadi, berdasarkan perhitungan penulis menemukan bahwa to lebih tinggi dari tt (2.079 > 1.672). Ini berarti bahwa data tersebut memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan, dengan hasil Ho ditolak dan Ha diterima. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa Quantum Thinker adalah model yang efektif dalam mengajar pemahaman membaca siswa.
Kata Kunci : Efektifitas, Model Quantum Thinker, Pemahaman Membaca Siswa
Daftar Pustaka 27 (1986 – 2016)
iv
ZBOARD OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL
Board of Examiners of Faculty of Educational Sciences certifies that thesis entitled ―THE EFFECTIVENESS OF QUANTUM THINKER MODEL IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION‖ written by Dwi Putri Puspitasari student‘s registration number 2012850050 was examined by the committees on February 22nd, 2017. The thesis has been accepted and declared to have fulfilled one of the requirements for the degree of (S.Pd.) in English Education at Faculty of Educational Sciences, Muhammadiyah University of Jakarta.
Acknowledge by,
FACULTY OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES
Dean,
(Dr. Hj. Herwina Bahar, M.A.)
Board of Examiners
Signature Date
Dr. Ahmad Susanto, M.Pd. Chairman
Zaitun, M.Pd. Secretary
Lidiyatul Izzah, M.Pd. Advisor
Dr. Muh. Sofian Hadi, M.Pd. Examiner – 1
APPROVAL SHEET
v
ENDORSEMENT SHEET
This is to certify that board of examiners has approved the undergraduate
thesis as follows:
Name : Dwi Putri Puspitasari
Student‘s Registration Number : 2012850050
Thesis Title : The Effectiveness of Quantum Thinker
Model in Teaching Reading
Comprehension
Academic Year : 2012/2013
Day : Wednesday
Date : February 22nd, 2017
…………………………………………………. Dr. Ahmad Susanto, M.Pd.
Chairman
…………………………………………………. Zaitun, M.Pd.
Secretary
…………………………………………………. Dr. Muh. Sofian Hadi, M.Pd.
Examiner – 1
………………………………………………… Mutiarani, M.Pd.
Examiner – 2
vi
PAKTA INTEGRITAS
Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
a. Nama : Dwi Putri Puspitasari
b. Tempat, Tanggal Lahir : Jakarta, 29 Oktober 1994
c. Fakultas/Prodi : Ilmu Pendidikan/Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
d. Nomor Pokok : 2012850050
e. Alamat Rumah : Jl. Tanah Kusir II No. 31 Rt. 010/009 Kel.
Kebayoran Lama Selatan, Kec. Kebayoran
Lama, Jakarta Selatan 12240.
f. No.Tlp/Hp : 089505058464
g. Judul Skripsi : The Effectiveness of Quantum Thinker Model
in Teaching Reading Comprehension
Dengan ini menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa seluruh
dokumen/data yang saya sampaikan dalam skripsi ini adalah benar sesuai
dengan ketentuan yang berlaku.
Apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan seluruh atau sebagian dokumen/data
terdapat indikasi penyimpangan/pemalsuan pada bagian tertentu, saya
bersedia menerima sanksi sesuai dengan perundang-undangan yang
berlaku.
Demikian pakta integritas ini saya buat dengan sesungguhnya tanpa ada
paksaan dari siapapun juga, untuk dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya.
Jakarta, 22 Februari 2017
Mahasiswa yang bersangkutan,
vii
Dwi Putri Puspitasari
PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN
PUBLIKASI TUGAS AKHIR UNTUK PENINGKATAN AKADEMIK
Sebagai sivitas Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah
Jakarta, saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama : Dwi Putri Puspitasari
NIM : 2012850050
Program Studi : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Fakultas : Ilmu Pendidikan
Jenis Karya : Skripsi
Demi pengembangan ilmu pendidikan menyetujui untuk memberikan
kepada Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta Hak
Bebas Royalti Non Eksklusif (Non Exclusive Royalty Free Right) atas
karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul:
THE EFFECTIVENES OF QUANTUM THINKER MODEL IN
TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION
Beserta perangkat yang ada (jika diperlukan). Dengan ini hak bebas royalti
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan berhak menyimpan, menggali media, mengelola
dalam bentuk perangkat data (data base), merawat dan mempublikasikan
skripsi saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai
penulis/pencipta dan sebagai pemilik hak cipta.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenar-benarnya.
Dibuat di Jakarta,
Pada tanggal, 22 Februari 2017
Dwi Putri Puspitasari
ix
DEDICATION
I dedicated my thesis to my beloved family and friends.
Thank you so much for your motivation.
x
MOTTO
“The moment you feel like giving up, remember all the reasons you held on for so long”
“So do not weaken and do not grieve, and you will be superior if you are (true) believers”
(QS. Ali „Imran: 139)
xi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
All praised be to Allah, Lord of the world, who has given the writer
love and blessing in finishing this thesis. Peace and salutation be upon to
the prophet Muhammad SAW, His family, His companion, and His
adherence.
This thesis is presented to English Education Program, Faculty of
Educational Sciences, Muhammadiyah University of Jakarta in order to
fulfill one of the requirements for English Bachelor Degree (S.Pd.). The
writer would like to thank to Allah SWT who has given health, knowledge,
patience, and strength so that the writer was able to finish this thesis well.
The writer also would like to express her thanks and gratitude to her
beloved parents, H. Sugeng Priono and Herlina who always given support,
pray, motivation and moral encouragement to finish her study and she also
thanks to all of her family.
The writer also would like to address her great honor and attitude to
her thesis advisor, Lidiyatul Izzah, M.Pd., who has guided and supported
her along her thesis writing. Her appreciation and gratitude also go to:
1. Dr. Hj. Herwina Bahar, MA., as the Dean of Faculty of
Educational Sciences.
2. Zaitun, M.Pd., as the Head of English Education Department.
3. All lecturers in English Department for teaching her precious
knowledge and giving wonderful study experiences.
4. Drs. Sumarwadi as the headmaster of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
who has given the writer permission in doing the research.
5. All friends in Muhammadiyah University of Jakarta especially in
English Department.
6. All people that the writer can‘t mention one by one, who have
been give motivation, help and support for the writer to finish this
thesis.
xii
The words are not enough to say any appreciation for their help and
contribution to this thesis. May Allah bless them for all of what they have
done. The writer realizes that this thesis is still far from being perfect.
Thus, comments and suggestions are welcome to the improvement of this
thesis. Hopefully, the presence of this thesis can be useful for the readers.
Jakarta, 22 Februari 2017
The Writer
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i
ABSTRAK ii
APPROVAL SHEET iii
BOARD OF EXAMINERS APPROVAL iv
ENDORSEMENT SHEET v
PAKTA INTEGRITAS vi
PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI ILMIAH vii
DEDICATION viii
MOTTO ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x
TABLE OF CONTENTS xii
LIST OF TABLES xiv
LIST OF FIGURES xv
LIST OF APPENDICES xvi
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study 1
B. Identification of the Problem 4
C. Limitation of the Problem 5
D. Problem of the Study 5
E. The Objective of the Study 5
F. Significance of the Study 6
CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW
A. The Description of the Theories 7
1. Reading 7
a. The Definition of Reading 7
b. The Purpose of Reading 9
c. The Kinds of Reading 12
d. The Understanding of Reading Comprehension 14
e. The Factors Influence Reading Comprehension 16
xiv
2. Quantum Thinker Model 17
a. The Definition of Quantum Thinker Model 17
b. Quantum Thinker as Teaching Model 19
c. Procedure of Quantum Thinker Model 21
d. Advantages and Disadvantages of Quantum Thinker
Model 23
B. Theoretical Framework 24
C. Hypothesis of the Study 26
CHAPTER III. METHODS AND PROCEDURES
A. Time and Place of the Study 27
B. Method of the Study 27
C. Operational Definition of Variables 29
D. Population and Sample 30
E. Techniques for Collecting the Data 30
F. Techniques for Analyzing the Data 32
CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS
A. Findings 36
1. Test Analysis 36
a. Validity 36
b. Reliability 37
2. Data Description 37
3. Data Analysis 47
B. Interpretations 54
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusions 56
B. Suggestions 57
REFERENCES 59
APPENDICES 62
xv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1. Quasi – Experimental Design 28
Table 3.2. Matrix of Assessment for Students' Reading Comprehension
33
Table 4.1. Questionnaire Validity 36
Table 4.2. The Students‘ Pre-test and Post-test Score in Class X IPS (The
Experimental Class) 37
Table 4.3. The Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Experimental Class
40
Table 4.4. The Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Experimental
Class 41
Table 4.5. The Students‘ Pre-test and Post-test Score in Class X MIPA 1
(The Control Class) 42
Table 4.6. The Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Control Class 44
Table 4.7. The Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Control Class 46
Table 4.8. The Students‘ Gained Score in Class X IPS (The Experimental
Class) 47
Table 4.9. The Students‘ Gained Score in Class X MIPA 1 (The Control
Class) 50
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1. Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Experimental
Class 40
Figure 4.2. Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Experimental
Class 42
Figure 4.3. Diagram of Frequency distribution of Pre-test in Control Class
45
Figure 4.4. Diagram of Frequency distribution of Post-test in Control Class
46
xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix-1 The Lesson Plan of Experimental Class 62
Appendix-2 The Lesson Plan of Control Class 100
Appendix-3 Form of the Student‘s Pre-test in Experimental Class 137
Appendix-4 Form of the Student‘s Post-test in Experimental Class 138
Appendix-5 Form of the Student‘s Pre-test in Control Class 139
Appendix-6 Form of the Student‘s Post-test in Control Class 140
Appendix-7 Pre-test and Post-test Score of Experimental Class 141
Appendix-8 The Pre-test and Post-test Score of Control Class 142
Appendix-9 The t-table and df at Significance Level 5% 143
Appendix-10 Table of the Questionnaire Validity 144
Appendix-11 Kartu Menyaksikan Ujian Skripsi 146
Appendix-12 Surat Bimbingan 147
Appendix-13 Kartu Bimbingan 148
Appendix-14 Surat Permohonan Izin Penelitian 149
Appendix-15 The Documentation of Experimental Class 150
Appendix-16 The Documentation of Control Class 151
Appendix-17 Surat Keterangan Penelitian dari Sekolah 152
Appendix-18 Bimbingan Pasca Sidang Skripsi 153
Appendix-19 Riwayat Hidup Penulis 154
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
In teaching and learning process, reading has an important role in
progressing student‘s knowledge in English language. Reading as one
of the four language skill that are learned by students. Many students
are getting the difficulties for mastering English reading skill because
the students are too lazy to read unknown language. Besides, the
students are not also able to comprehend the text due to the lack of
understanding in terms of the vocabulary and discourse structure in
language system. Reading is very useful for students language
acquisition. In addition, Allah SWT ordered human being to read and
write. It was expressed in surah Al – ‗Alaq as follow:
―Read, for your Lord is the Most Generous (3) Who taught by the pen
(4) Taught man that which he knew not (5)‖. (Qs. Al – ‗Alaq: 3-5 ).
In the surah Al – ‗Alaq 3-5, Allah SWT requires of Muslims and in
general all humanity to read. Reading is an important skill that
students‘ should have in learning English as foreign language. In
English as foreign language context, reading has been an important
part of the English skills which is needed to master. Reading activity
can help students to gain knowledge and information all over the world.
Furthermore, Sheng (2000: 58) define reading is a communication
2
process from the writer to the reader and the recognition of letters,
words, phrases, and clauses are involved. By reading, readers
recognize the information from written materials but it is not guaranteed
that they can comprehend it due to the different reading
comprehension of each reader.
Reading comprehension is the ability to go beyond the words, to
understand the ideas and the relationships between ideas conveyed in
a text. So that reading comprehension is the process of identifying
topic, main idea, supporting ideas and writer's message based on
background knowledge or experience in inferring the implied
information of a text.
The ultimate goal of teaching reading is comprehension. It means
that the students need to have the ability to understand the text.
Furthermore, based on the National Curriculum (2013), students of
senior high school are expected to be able to comprehend texts and
develop their ability both oral and written to achieve informational level
which they are capable of accessing language ability in daily and
academic context.
In senior high school, the students learn the different text types,
there are narrative, descriptive, procedure, report and recount text.
One of them is descriptive text. Descriptive text is a text that describes
someone, place, things, person looks like. Descriptive text is given to
10th and 11th graders in senior high school. In reading descriptive text,
the students face some obstacles, one of them is the lack of
vocabulary. A descriptive text consists of some paragraphs and the
3
students may find some unfamiliar words in each paragraph. Another
obstacle in reading descriptive text is construing the ideas in a text or
paragraph. Some students may be wrong in interpreting a text because
they do not know how to construe the idea of the descriptive text. Most
of the students think that learning to read is simply thing, it shows how
important reading model in helping students to read a paragraph or
texts and it involves understanding or comprehending the meaning of
the text.
There are some models in reading comprehension. One of the
proposed reading models is Quantum Thinker introduced by DePorter
in 2007. Quantum Thinker model is expected as an excellent model to
be used with a textbook which provides a lot of information. DePorter
(2009: 21) introduces Quantum Thinker as a model of the way in
thinking bigger than it was before and absorbed through its 5
principles; (1) There is always another way; (2) Always want to know
about something; (3) Look for as many ideas as you can; (4) Find the
example in your own environment; and (5) Stay focus on who you are
and what you want. Through Quantum Thinker's principle, teaching
reading comprehension in class can be done through five steps. First,
the students are instructed to read only the title of a written text, next
they create several questions related to the title of the text, then they
look for as many ideas as they can to answer their questions, after that
they relate the topic to the text's title with their own experience and
environment, finally they are allowed to read the text as a whole. By
4
implementing this model, students are expected to focus their reading
of a text on which they are and what they want to know.
Reviews of the previous study Ansas (2014) also reveal that
Quantum Thinker model was considered as an appropriate and
effective model in teaching reading. In other words, the implementation
of Quantum Thinker model had significant influence toward the
students' reading ability. Thus, the implementation of Quantum Thinker
model in the classroom is considered as a very valuable experience for
students.
Concerning the reasons above, the writer interested to investigate
how Quantum Thinker model can help 10th grade students reading
comprehension. The title of the research is; “THE EFFECTIVENESS
OF QUANTUM THINKER MODEL IN TEACHING READING
COMPREHENSION”.
B. Identification of the Problem
Based on the background, there are some problems that can be
identified dealing with the implementation of Quantum Thinker model in
teaching reading comprehension. They are as follows:
1. Students are lack of reading comprehension.
2. Students are lack in understanding the text.
3. Students are not able to get the main idea of they have read.
4. Students are lack of participation in learning.
5. English teacher are still lack of creativity to give the model in
teaching reading comprehension. They just give explanation and
5
exercise in reading comprehension without applying the
appropriate model.
C. Limitation of the Problem
Based on those problems that have been identified above, this
research is limited or focused on the effectiveness of Quantum Thinker
model in teaching reading comprehension at tenth grade students of
SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
D. Problem of the Study
Based on the limitation of the problem, the writer states the problem
as follow: is there any effectiveness of using Quantum Thinker model in
teaching reading comprehension?
E. The Objective of the Study
Thus, the objective of this research is to find out the effectiveness of
the implementations of Quantum Thinker model in teaching reading
comprehension.
F. Significance of the Study
The present research is believed to have theoretical, practical, and
professional significances. The research which is focused on the
effectiveness of Quantum Thinker as a teaching and learning model is
expected to be useful for both students and teachers.
For the students, the writer hopes that the effectiveness of
Quantum Thinker model in teaching and learning can improve reading
6
ability, enhance their ability in reading text, and also improve their
comprehension of reading a text.
For the English teachers, the writer hopes that research will help
them to find some innovations and alternative model of teaching
reading comprehension. It can also be used as consideration to be a
chosen model by language courses or schools.
For other researchers, hopefully this research is expected to give
and developing information about the students‘ reading comprehension
through the Quantum Thinker model to build an effective teaching and
learning which is appropriate to students needs and improving students
learning outcomes especially in reading comprehension.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
A. The Description of the Theories
7
1. Reading
a. The Definition of Reading
Reading is a source of information that can open our
insights about various things such as science, economic,
social, cultural, politically and other aspects of life. In
addition, by reading can increase one's knowledge and
improves memory and comprehension. And often read the
people develop their ability; both to receive and process the
knowledge and to learn the various disciplines and its
application in life.
Walter (2008: 1181) stated that getting meaning from text
depends on the readers‘ prior knowledge about the written
message. In the dictionary, reading is also defined as the
skill or activity of getting information from books. The more
people read the more they get the information which can
contribute to their life, such as reaching success for school
students.
Based on Connelly (2016: 6) reading is a skill that is
found a cross content areas in the academic setting. As
such, comprehension of what is read is paramount to
academic achievement.
Comprehension as one of the characteristics of reading,
McNamara (2007:28) stated that comprehension is the
interpretation of the information in the text, the use of prior
knowledge to interpret this information and, ultimately, the
8
construction of a coherent representation or picture in the
reader mind of what the text is about.
Based on the statement above, reading skill can be learnt
in all grade, even reading become one of the most important
thing in daily live. By reading can help us getting a lot
information, various kinds of new information which have not
yet we know most likely it can be useful to us later. With
reading, we can also interpret the conclusion of information
from the text by using our own word. Besides, reading
comprehension is a process of relating the readers‘
background knowledge with information in the text to get the
message of the text. So, the reader is not a passive role,
because the reader makes an interpretation, the conclusion
of information, and searching for information. The more
knowledge we have, and then we will be better prepared to
face life's challenges both in the present and in the days to
come.
b. The Purpose of Reading
There are several purposes of reading which are
declared by some experts. McDonough and Shaw (2003: 90)
classify reason for reading:
1) Getting general information from the text
2) Getting specific information from a text
3) For pleasure or for interest
9
Another purpose of reading is also stated by Nation
(2009: 49) that reading is a source of learning and a source
of enjoyment. It can be a goal in its own right and a way of
reaching other goals. As a source of learning, reading can
establish previously learned vocabulary and grammar, it can
help learners learn new vocabulary and grammar, and
through success in language use it can encourage learners
to learn more and continue with their language study. As a
goal in its own right, reading can be a source of enjoyment
and a way of gaining knowledge of the world. As learners
gain skill and fluency in reading, their enjoyment can
increase.
It means that special purpose reading is not only for
learning language or interested in the pronunciation or
interesting in grammar, and getting the pleasure. But it aims
to get meaning or message from the text that read.
According to Grabe and Stoller statement as cited by
Nida‘s book (2000: 9-10), there are four purposes of reading,
they are:
1) Reading to search for simple information.
Most people said that reading to search for simple
information is a common reading ability, though some
researchers see it as a relatively independent cognitive
process. In reading to search, we typically scan the text
for specific information or a specific word. For example,
10
when we are read search the meaning of word in the
dictionary, we typically scan the text for specific
information. Typically, this is done when we already know
exactly what we are looking so concentrate search for
specific answers.
2) Reading to learn from text.
It is usually occurs in academic and professional
context when people need to learn a considerable
amount of information from a text. For example, when we
are reading a book and one text, we usually read the
title, subtitle and subheading to find out what was
discussed of the texts.
3) Reading to integrated information, write and critique
texts.
This purpose requires additional decisions about the
relative importance of complementary, mutually
supporting or conflicting information and the likely
restructuring of a rhetorical frame to accommodate
information from multiple sources. For example, when we
are reading a book or a text, we use our mind critique the
text about positive or negative contents from the text, and
we write them.
4) Reading for general comprehension
We can say that general reading comprehension is
the most basic purpose for reading, underlying, and
11
supporting most other purposes for reading. This
purpose is usually used when we are reading. When we
are reading, we try to comprehend the text to get
information that very important or we need in everyday
life.
Based on the statement above people read for many
purposes, the writer concluded that the purpose of reading
mainly to get something or information from the text, read for
pleasure and some read for includes content, understand the
meaning of reading it relates to the purpose or our intensive
in reading. Reading is very important for human life, because
reading can enrich and expand insight of life, so that readers
are increasingly able to mature themselves.
c. The Kinds of Reading
Harmer (2007: 99) stated that are two kinds of reading as
below:
1) Intensive Reading
Intensive reading refers to the detailed focus on the
construction of reading texts which takes place usually
(but not always) in classrooms. Teachers may ask
students to look at extracts from magazine, poem,
Internet websites, novels, newspaper, plays and a wide
range of other text genres (that is, style or types of text).
In another hand, in intensive reading is program activities
of reading are carried out carefully, each vocabulary and
12
structural item is explained and made as fact of our
active language, pronunciation, and intonation are
stressed, and each concept allusion is clarified. In this
reading, the students only read one or a few choices
from reading material available and aims to cultivate and
sharpen the ability to read critically. Besides, intensive
reading is used to gain a deep understanding of a text,
which is important for the reader. The process of
scanning takes a more prominent role than skimming.
2) Extensive Reading
The term extensive reading refers to reading which
students do often (but not exclusively) away from the
classroom. They may read novels, web pages,
newspaper magazines or any other reference material. In
other words, extensive reading should involve reading for
pleasure, the readers do not need to know the exact
meaning of the word just getting an overall
understanding of the text from those classification, it can
be concluded that a reading program that is widely
performed, both of the type as well as various of the text
and the purposed just to understand the contents that
significance of reading materials that read by using the
time fastest maybe. The students are given freedom and
flexibility in thing of having, both the type and scope
reading materials that they read.
13
Based on statement above it can be compared that
intensive reading is a classroom-oriented activity in the
students which focus on the linguistic or semantic details of a
passage. Intensive reading calls students' attention to
grammatical forms, discourse markers, and other surface
structure details for the purpose of understanding the literal
meaning. Meanwhile, extensive reading is generally
associated with reading large amounts with the aim of getting
an overall understanding of the material. Readers are more
concerned with the meaning of the text than the meaning of
individual words or sentences.
d. The Understanding of Reading Comprehension
There are several understanding of reading
comprehension based on Zein et al., (2014) in Connelly
(2016: 6) divined that ―reading comprehension is a skill that
is composed of an individual‘s language skills, pertinent
knowledge, and cognitive process‖. Additionally, Nunan
(2006: 71) stated that ―reading comprehension refers to
reading for meaning, understanding, and entertainment‖.
From those definitions, it clearly states that both author
emphasized on meaning and understanding. Thus in the
reading process, the readers not only read text but they need
to comprehend and find out what the author tried to convey
based on the text they read.
14
Meanwhile, the statement of Paris and Hamilton as cited
by Israel and Dufy (2009: 32) that ―reading comprehension is
only a subset of an ill-defined larger set of knowledge that
reflects the communicative interactions among the intentions
of the author/speaker, the content of the text/message, the
abilities and purposes of the reader/listener, and the
context/situation of the interaction‖. From both definitions, the
author concludes that reading is a process communicative
interaction that is carried and used by readers to get the
message to be conveyed by the author through the content
of the text/written language. It means that the stronger the
goals person's for reading then also increase the person it
ability to understand the reading.
Additionally, Scanlon et al., (2010: 276) stated that
―comprehension is an active, constructive process in which
the ultimate understanding of the text is determined by a
combination of what is stated directly in the text and the
reader‘s preexisting knowledge related to the topic of the
text‖. From that definition the final goal of reading is to
understand the idea, the ability to catch the meaning directly
in the text as a whole with knowledge related to the topic of
the text both in narrative form, free text, or poems that can be
concluded in a papers or unwritten.
In other words, reading comprehension is an active
interaction from the reader in comprehending the author
15
through the content of the text/written language that
conveyed by author. In addition, while reading, the reader‘s
not only catch the meaning directly in the text or absorbs new
information but the reader also needs to combine their prior
knowledge.
e. The Factors Influence Reading Comprehension
McIntyre et al., (2011: 113) mention some factors that
has been identified as the primary determinants of reading
comprehension, they are: the reader‘s background
knowledge and vocabulary (reader) interact with his or her
purposes for reading (e.g., to scan for information, study for
a test, or read for pleasure; activity) and the type of text
(Internet website, textbook, novel) to contribute to his or her
comprehension.
McIntyre et al., (2011: 113) added ―reading is
comprehending. If children can read the words of a text, but
do not understand what they are reading, they are not really
reading‖. How much and how easily readers comprehend
depends on variables within and outside them. Further,
Charmot & O‘Malley (1994) statement as cited by Bouchard
(2005: 8) cited four reasons:
1) Content provides students with an opportunity to develop
important knowledge in different subject areas.
16
2) Students are able to practice the language functions and
skills needed to understand, discuss, read about and
write about the concept develop.
3) Many students are more highly motivated to learn when
they are learning content rather isolated language skill.
4) Content provides meaningful context for teaching learning
strategies.
The writer sums up that the factors that affect reading
comprehension can be divided into two kinds, namely that
there is inside and outside in self the readers. The factors
that are inside in self the reader includes linguistic abilities,
background knowledge, curiosity to read a text, motivation
(how much concern the reader to read the task or general
feelings about reading and school), and the reading skills
(how well readers can read). And then, the factors that are
outside in self the reader includes reading elements such as
the level of difficulty of reading material and reading
environment such as teacher preparation before, during, or
after reading lessons to help students understand the text.
2. Quantum Thinker Model
a. The Definition of Quantum Thinker Model
There are several definitions of Quantum Thinker model
based on Ruggierro (2008: 16) stated that thinking is
sometimes regarded as two harmonious processes. One
17
process is the production of ideas (creative thinking),
accomplished by widening your focus and looking at many
possibilities. The other process is the evaluation of ideas
(critical thinking), accomplished by narrowing your focus.
Based on this definition, thinking can be taught include some
approaches for producing ideas, but its main focus will be
evaluating ideas—that is, critical thinking.
Meanwhile, students do not only need creative thinking
but thinking creative should be used in reading
comprehension. Quantum Thinker model is expected as an
excellent model to be used with a textbook which provides a
lot of information. DePorter (2009: 21) introduced Quantum
Thinker as a model of the way in thinking bigger than it was
before and absorbed. Thus the writer sums up that the
teaching and learning with Quantum Thinker model is
designed to facilitate the students to learn and think bigger
such as it can express the idea about of what the students
knew, so that it becomes a creative thinking.
According to Blum (2006: 175) defined that Quantum
Thinker model is as a necessary act for the governing idea or
abstraction that is realized. Thus, the students can see that
all ideas can be further developed. It involves students‘
minds which accompanied by a discussion of the ideas.
In other words, Quantum Thinker model it can increases
their thinking skill. They also have much more control over
18
their thinking and how they wear them because they know
their thinking style. By using Quantum Thinker model is
process to turn ideas into action.
b. Quantum Thinker as Teaching Model
Quantum Thinker model is one of part that creates
interactions and active students. According to Yasser et al.,
(2014: 86) stated that learning is designed to develop the
learners' learning on thinking skills. Quantum Thinker
learning model is the model that used to improve students‘
thinking skill, especially in learning reading comprehension
so the ability of the students can be developed. In the
learning process of Quantum Thinker model, teachers and
students are involved in learning process they collaborate to
achieve maximum results.
Quantum combines all the things in the class to support
learning process, consists of Quantum Teaching model and
Quantum Learning model. In Quantum Learning model,
Given and DePorter (2015: 14) stated that Quantum
Learning model focuses on culture and cognition while
orchestrating interactions between teachers and students,
students and students, students and content to reach desired
academic and social/emotional outcomes. It means that
teaching and learning are open, dynamic, and complex
systems. Quantum Learning model it can be defined flexible
enough to embrace changes in education such as
19
enthusiasm skills, talents, or potential of students through
interaction with other people and the environment.
Meanwhile, Quantum Teaching model shows how to be
a good teacher. Quantum Teaching model shows new ways
that make the learning process easier through the art
element guiding and the directed achievements for whatever
subjects you are teach. According to DePorter (1992) in
Gunarhadi et al., journal (2014: 196), Quantum Teaching
model is like conducting a symphony and orchestrating two
major elements: context and content. The context element
deals with the preparation of the classroom where the
learning process will take place. The content element, on the
other hand, refers to the implementation of a teaching model
in which the curriculum is presented in the actual learning
process.
From the statement above, the writer summarizes that
Quantum Thinker model is to create an effective learning
environment, create the learning process with fun, to
increase the ability of think bigger to convey the ideas, and
help accelerate in learning. In Quantum Learning model is a
learning model that can increase teacher effectiveness when
facilitating students' mastery of content and it makes learning
process can be fun and learn effectively. Meanwhile, by
applying the Quantum Teaching models is directed for
learning process and facing the students in class and also for
20
evaluate learning. Based on the learning with Quantum
Teaching and Learning models, Quantum Thinker model can
used as teaching model in reading comprehension.
c. Procedure of Quantum Thinker Model
Dweck‘s (1986) in book Creswell (2012: 333), the
definition of procedure is as performance goals or learning
goals. Further procedures were specific to the classroom
structure condition. As this research the teaching and
learning process includes the steps of the activity for both the
teacher and students.
The elaboration of the teaching of reading using
Quantum Thinker model is designed based on the following
step:
1) Before Reading: Predicting
The teacher instructed students to read only the title
of a written text, and then teacher used the pictures
based on the topic to trigger the students‘ prior
knowledge toward the learning topic.
In this stage, teacher instructed students to create a
questions related to the title of the text. Teacher gives
students‘ handout to note their questions and answer
toward the text that is learned, with expectation to
develop feel want to know of their selves, so it is to
increase an interest to learn for students.
2) While Reading: Silent Reading
21
The teacher gives chance to the students to look for
as many ideas as they can to answers their questions
review.
After the students look for as many ideas as they
can, the students relate to the topic of the text‘s title with
their own experience and environment, so there is
motivation of the students that ever experienced with the
material to develop their experience more, and to the
students that ever have no experience with that material
to become more interested to be learned.
3) After Reading: Confirming the Prediction
In this activity, teacher convey the material that will
be learned in full after the students relate to the topic of
the text‘s title with their own experience and environment,
then the teacher give article based on the topic and the
students are allowed to read the text as a whole, after
that students‘ handout would be marked for questions
and answers that is appeared in the text, the students‘
handout were in a form of the table that consists of
prediction column (questions and answers) and mark
column.
By implementing this model, students are expected to
focus their reading of a text on which they are and what they
want to know.
22
d. Advantages and Disadvantages of Quantum Thinker
Model
Quantum Thinker model is the act of creating something
of value where the students to think bigger in learning and it
comes with a great sense of self achievement and
satisfaction them have developed the skills to use it properly.
Blum (2006: 164) said that Quantum Thinker vied for how the
action of the moment would be conceived, informed by a
sense… and thus how they could be guided.
By using the Quantum Thinker model will make learning
more alive, effective and at last the students' will optimally
acquire the learning outcomes. With some of these
advantages, the learning results obtained will be higher than
using conventional learning that just makes the teacher as
the only source of learning.
In conclusion, Quantum Thinker model it can be seen as
a complement and extension of learning model in reading
comprehension. In teaching and learning process in the
classroom the teacher it can engages students with an good
question that it can pique their interest, make them wonder
why, get them to think, and motivate them to make
connections with the content . Beside the advantages, the
disadvantage of Quantum Thinker model is requires the skill
of teachers in particularly, because without supported it,
23
learning process will not be effective. Thus, Quantum Thinker
model can replace the conventional learning.
B. Theoretical Framework
Reading is one of the skills that should be mastered by the students
in learning English. Reading is also defined as the skill or ability of
getting information from books. As we know, when the readers read
they need to comprehend the meaning and information from the texts
while they read. Therefore, an appropriate and effective technique
should be applied to help readers improve their ability to comprehend
text.
The use of technique in comprehending texts (reading
comprehension) is perhaps the most important means to helping
readers improve comprehension and learning from books. Reading
comprehension is a part of life that is very important to access
information of the text because when students involve in reading, they
will understand what they have read, and they are able to say word to
convey an idea or a motion that is in effective reading.
As one of model in reading, Quantum Thinker model is considered
meaningful to improving the students‘ reading comprehension
especially problem of the students‘ to get the main idea and detail
information in the texts. It also involved the students to be able to
connect their prior knowledge with the information of the text through
students‘ participation in of learning process. Quantum Thinker model
has aims to create the students will be more active in learning
24
environment and to increase the ability of think bigger to convey the
ideas as they can. The use of Quantum Thinker model in the
classroom can increase students‘ comprehension. By implementing
this model, students are expected to focus their reading of a text on
which they are and what they want to know.
Quantum Thinker model is very appropriate for the students
because the students can work together to share the ideas that ever
experienced with the material through this model. By applying
Quantum Thinker model, teachers and students are involved in
learning process they collaborate to achieve maximum results.
C. Hypothesis of the Study
Fraenkel et al., (2012: 83) stated that ―a hypothesis is a prediction
of the possible outcomes of a study‖. To know the effective of Quantum
Thinker model in teaching reading comprehension, the writer
formulates two hypotheses that will be tested by using t-test. They are:
1. Null Hypothesis (Ho)
There is no effectiveness of Quantum Thinker model in teaching
reading comprehension at tenth grade students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3
Jakarta.
2. Alternative Hypothesis (Ha)
There is an effectiveness of Quantum Thinker model in teaching
reading comprehension at tenth grade students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3
Jakarta.
25
CHAPTER III
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
A. Time and Place of the Study
The research was conducted at SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta which is
located on Jalan BRI Radio Dalam, Gandaria Utara, Kebayoran Baru,
South - Jakarta in academic year of 2016/2017. This research was held
on November 1st 2016 - December 3rd 2016.
B. Method of the Study
In conducting the research, the quantitative research was applied
using quasi experimental as the research design. The following
definition of quantitative research is Creswell (2014: 4) mentions that:
―the quantitative research is an approach for testing objective theories by examining the relationship among variable. These variables, in turn, can be measured, typically on instruments, so that numbered data can be analyzed using statistical procedures‖. In this research, the students that chosen was randomly. According
to Creswell (2012: 296) states that the most rigorous approach of
experimental design is to randomly assign individuals to the
treatments. Further, the random assignment deals with random
26
selection. Besides, Creswell (2012: 297) adds that ―quantitative
researchers randomly select a sample from a population‖.
Therefore, there are two groups taken in this research. The first
group is experimental class and the second group is control class. The
experimental class was given Quantum Thinker as the teaching model
and control class was given the traditional model. Both groups got the
pre-test and post-test. Below is a quasi-experimental design developed
by Creswell (2012: 310):
Table 3.1
Quasi-Experimental Design
Pre- and Posttest Design Time
Select Control Group Pretest Non Treatment Posttest
Select Experimental
Group Pretest
Experimental
Treatment Posttest
Adopted from: Creswell (2012: 310)
Based on the design above, it can be seen that both of the groups
are given pre-test in the beginning of the research. Then, the
treatments are only given to the experimental class before
implementing the post-test. This is to find out whether the students who
are treated by using Quantum Thinker model could achieve greater
score than those who are treated by using traditional model.
27
C. Operational Definition of Variables
According to Creswell (2012: 112), variable is a characteristic of an
individual or organization that can be measured by the researcher and
also varies which has different value among different individuals or
organization. The variables used in this quasi experimental research,
they are; independent variable (X) and dependent variable (Y). In this
study, independent variable (variable X) is using the Quantum Thinker
model and the dependent variable (variable Y) is students‘ reading
comprehension. As an independent variable, using the Quantum
Thinker model can help the teacher to teach reading comprehension.
The teacher use Quantum Thinker model to help the students
describe something such as person, place, and thing with easily and
clearly. By using Quantum Thinker model, also developed the students'
enthusiasm and creativity in the learning process, and encouraged
them to improve their reading ability.
Meanwhile, dependent variable is students‘ reading
comprehension. It is about the result of students‘ scores in reading
comprehension by descriptive text that is measured by test through
Quantum Thinker model in teaching reading comprehension for
students at tenth grade of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
D. Population and Sample
28
The population in this research is at tenth grade students in the
2016/2017 academic year of school SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta. There
are three classes of tenth graders: they are X MIPA 1, X MIPA 2 and X
IPS with total of population was 89 students. Creswell (2012: 142)
stated that the target population or the sampling frame is a group of
individuals or a organizations with some common defining
characteristic that the researcher can apply the result of a research.
The sample is a group of the target population that the researcher has
selected to collect data of the target population.
The writer used cluster random sampling to choose the sample
(class X IPS and X MIPA 1). These two classes were directly assigned
as experimental class (X IPS) and control class (X MIPA 1). The total
of the samples were 60 students, 34 students from class X IPS and 26
students from X MIPA 1.
E. Techniques for Collecting the Data
In order to collect the data, the procedure of the study consists of
some steps, there are pre-test and post-test. Besides, to measure the
students‘ comprehension of the descriptive text by using pre-test and
post-test consisted of essay test. The writer formulated the essay test
by using Erlangga‘s book.
The data of this study were students‘ results of reading text. In this
study, both pre-test and post-test were used to collect the data. Before
the test administered, the validity of the research in pre-test and post-
test was analyzed is valid, because the value from the r-table is 0.367.
29
In addition, pre-test was given before treatment in the first meeting
and post-test was given after treatment. For the second until eight
meeting, the writer gave Quantum Thinker model to the students of the
experimental class to conduct treatment.
1. Pre-test
The topic of pre-test is about working on essay questions as
much as 10 questions from descriptive text of describing people. In
addition, pre-test was given to analyse students in reading
comprehension. The writer gave scores for every student based on
matrix of assessment. It is given to the experimental class and the
control class to collect the data whether those groups had the same
ability or not before they got the treatment.
2. Treatment
In this meeting, treatment was conducted before the post-test
performed. The treatment was conducted by using Quantum
Thinker model as media of teaching to experimental class.
Furthermore, in the control class was taught without using Quantum
Thinker model. In this step, because of the reading model used was
Quantum Thinker model, the main equipment of the lessons was
pictures and students‘ handout. As for the procedures that used
those are:
1) At the beginning of the lesson the pictures were used in order to
trigger the students‘ prior knowledge toward the topic.
2) The pictures were varied in each meeting due to the different
topic based on the lesson plan (see Appendix 1) such as
30
pictures in Flyer of a Missing Person, Semarang, Borobudur
Temple, and Purna Bhakti Pertiwi Museum.
3) The students‘ handout were used by students to note their
questions and answers toward the text learned in each meeting
that later, after they read the text, the students‘ handout would
be marked for questions and answers that appeared in the text.
4) The students' handout was in a form of table that consists of
prediction column (questions and answers) and mark column.
3. Post-test
In the last meeting, the writer gave post-test to both classes. It
is used to determine whether there was a significant progress on
students‘ reading comprehension, especially those who had treated
by Quantum Thinker model. The writer gives 10 essay questions.
The questions formulated in the post-test were similar to those in
pre-test.
F. Techniques for Analyzing the Data
In analyzing the data of this research the writer used the matrix of
assessment for students‘ reading comprehension was based on
analytic scale purposed by Omaggio (1986: 266), as follows:
31
Table 3.2
Matrix of Assessment for Students’ Reading Comprehension
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
In this research, the writer processed and analyzed the data from
the result of test has been given by the writer in experimental class and
control class. The writer uses statistical calculating of t-test formula in
significance level 5% with Degree of Freedom (df) and gained scores.
It is to test the significance of the main gained score of the
experimental class and control class. However, prerequisite tests
analysis, it needs to be used the hypothesis test.
1. Prerequisites Test Analysis
a. Hypothesis Test
According to Sudijono (2010: 34), t-test formula as follows:
32
M 1 : Mean of the Difference of Experimental Class.
M 2 : Mean of the Difference of Control Class.
SE M 1 : Standard of Error of Experimental Class.
SE M 2 : Standard of Error of Control Class.
Besides, to get the calculation of t-test, there are several
procedures of calculation to be taken:
1) Determine mean of variable X with formula:
2) Determine mean of variable X with formula:
3) Determine standard deviation variable X with formula:
4) Determine standard deviation variable Y with formula:
5) Determine standard error of variable X with formula:
6) Determine standard error of variable X with formula:
33
7) Determine standard error means of differences mean of
variable X and variable Y, with formula:
8) Determining t0 with formula:
9) Determining t-table in significance level 5% with Degree of
Freedom (df):
df = ( N1 + N2 ) – 2
34
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS
A. Findings
1. Test Analysis
a. Validity
The instrument in the post-test contains 10 items to 31
students of class XI MIPA SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta. By using
the product moment formula r-table at 0.05 significant with
0.367 r-table.
Here are table of the questionnaire validity:
Table 4.1
Questionnaire Validity
Item
Instrument
Correlation
Coefficient Information
1 0.91257 Valid
2 0.8054 Valid
3 0.98667 Valid
4 0.96259 Valid
5 0.98667 Valid
6 0.98667 Valid
7 0.94697 Valid
35
8 0.8591 Valid
9 0.95019 Valid
10 0.98667 Valid
b. Reliability
Then the item scores valid re-examined using reliability
test using Alpha Cronbach r = 0.98667 with the highest data.
2. Data Description
In the data description, the writer described the data which
had been collected from students‘ pre-test and post-test scores of
reading comprehension. The pre-test is given before treatment. It
is given into the experimental class and the control class. The
post-test is given after treatment was conducted. It is given into
the experimental class by presenting the Quantum Thinker model
and the post-test is given into the control class by using traditional
model.
Here are the table descriptions of pre-test and post-test scores:
Table 4.2
The Students’ Pre-test and Post-test Score in Class X IPS
(The Experimental Class)
Number Students Pre-test Post-test
(X1) (X2)
1 S1 70 95
2 S2 90 90
36
3 S3 80 80
4 S4 85 90
5 S5 85 90
6 S6 85 95
7 S7 80 85
8 S8 80 85
9 S9 90 95
10 S10 75 85
11 S11 85 90
12 S12 80 80
13 S13 70 95
14 S14 75 80
15 S15 80 95
16 S16 75 80
17 S17 80 80
18 S18 80 80
19 S19 80 85
20 S20 80 80
21 S21 80 85
22 S22 75 85
23 S23 80 85
24 S24 75 80
25 S25 75 80
26 S26 95 95
27 S27 90 95
37
28 S28 80 85
29 S29 80 90
30 S30 75 80
31 S31 80 95
32 S32 80 95
33 S33 75 80
34 S34 75 80
Amount 34 2720 2945
Mean 80 86.7
Based on the table above showed that the score of the
experimental class between pre-test and post-test were different.
The mean of students‘ score in the pre-test is 80 with the lowest
score of pre-test is 70 and the highest score of pre-test is 95.
Meanwhile, the mean of the students‘ score in the post-test is 86.7
with the lowest score of post-test is 80 and the highest score of
post-test is 95.
Here are table of the frequency distribution of pre-test and post-
test in experimental class:
38
Table 4.3
The Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Experimental Class
Class Interval Frequency
Absolute Relative%
70 – 75 11 32.35%
76 – 81 15 44.12%
82 – 87 4 11.76%
88 – 93 3 88.23%
94 – 99 1 29.41%
Total 34 100%
Figure 4.1
Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Experimental
Class
39
Based on the diagram of frequency distribution of pre-test of
the experimental class shows that the students who received
scores 70 – 75 there are 11 students with frequency relative
32.35%. The students who received scores 76 – 81 there are 15
students with frequency relative 44.12%. The students who
received scores 82 – 87 there are 4 students with frequency
relative 11.76%. The students who received scores 88 – 93 there
are 3 students with frequency relative 88.23%. The students who
received 94 – 99 scores there are 1 student with frequency relative
29.41%.
Table 4.4
The Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Experimental Class
Class Interval Frequency
Absolute Relative%
80 – 83 12 35.29%
84 – 87 8 23.53%
88 – 91 5 14.70%
92 – 95 9 26.47%
Total 34 100%
40
Figure 4.2
Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Experimental
Class
Based on the diagram of frequency distribution of post-test of
the experimental class shows that the students who received
scores 80 – 83 there are 12 students with frequency relative
35.29%. The students who received scores 84 – 87 there are 8
students with frequency relative 23.53%. The students who
received scores 88 – 91 there are 5 students with frequency
relative 14.70%. The students who received scores 92 – 95 there
are 9 students with frequency relative 26.47%.
Table 4.5
The Students’ Pre-test and Post-test Score in Class X MIPA 1
(The Control Class)
Number Students Pre-test Post-test
(Y1) (Y2)
1 S1 80 85
2 S2 65 70
41
3 S3 90 95
4 S4 80 90
5 S5 80 80
6 S6 80 90
7 S7 75 85
8 S8 50 65
9 S9 85 85
10 S10 80 80
11 S11 90 95
12 S12 80 90
13 S13 75 90
14 S14 65 65
15 S15 80 85
16 S16 50 65
17 S17 85 85
18 S18 80 90
19 S19 85 85
20 S20 50 70
21 S21 65 80
22 S22 65 70
23 S23 80 90
24 S24 85 90
25 S25 65 65
26 S26 65 65
Amount 26 1930 2105
42
Mean 74.4 80.9
Based on the table above showed that the score of the control
class between pre-test and post-test were different. The mean of
students‘ score in the pre-test is 74.4 with the lowest score of pre-
test is 50 and the highest score of pre-test is 90. Meanwhile, the
mean of the students‘ score in the post-test is 80.9 with the lowest
score of post-test is 65 and the highest score of post-test is 95.
Table 4.6
The Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Control Class
Class Interval Frequency
Absolute Relative%
50 – 56 3 11.54%
57 – 63 0 0%
64 – 70 6 23.08%
71 – 77 2 76.92%
78 – 84 9 34.61%
85 – 91 6 23.08%
Total 26 100%
43
Figure 4.3
Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Pre-test in Control Class
Based on the diagram of frequency distribution of pre-test of
the control class shows that the students who received scores 50
– 56 there are 3 students with frequency relative 11.54%. The
students who received scores 57 – 63 there is 0 students with
frequency relative 0%. The students who received scores 64 – 70
there are 6 students with frequency relative 23.08%. The students
who received scores 71 – 77 there are 2 students with frequency
relative 76.92%. The students who received 78 – 84 scores there
are 9 students with frequency relative 34.61%. The students who
received scores 85 – 91 there are 6 students with frequency
relative 23.08%.
Table 4.7
The Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Control class
44
Class Interval Frequency
Absolute Relative%
65 – 70 8 30.77%
71 – 76 0 0%
77 – 82 0 0%
83 – 88 6 23.08%
89 – 94 7 26.92%
95 – 100 2 76.92%
Total 26 100%
Figure 4.4
Diagram of Frequency Distribution of Post-test in Control Class
Based on the diagram of frequency distribution of post-test of
the control class shows that the students who received scores 65
– 70 there are 8 students with frequency relative 30.77%. The
students who received scores 71 – 76 there is 0 students with
frequency relative 0%. The students who received scores 77 – 82
there is 0 students with frequency relative 0%. The students who
45
received scores 83 – 88 there are 6 students with frequency
relative 23.08%. The students who received scores 89 – 94 there
are 7 students with frequency relative 26.92%. The students who
received scores 95 – 100 there are 2 students with frequency
relative 76.92%.
3. Data Analysis
Based on the data obtained, the writer analyzed the test score
of the experimental class and control class by calculating the
result into the formula t-test. Before using the formula of t-test, the
students‘ score in experimental and control classes were tabulated
the gained score of each class as follows:
Table 4.8
The Students’ Gained Score in Class X IPS
(The Experimental Class)
Number Students Pre-test Post-test Gained
Score X2
X1 X2
1 S1 70 95 25 625
2 S2 90 90 0 0
3 S3 80 80 0 0
4 S4 85 90 5 25
5 S5 85 90 5 25
6 S6 85 95 10 100
7 S7 80 85 5 25
8 S8 80 85 5 25
46
9 S9 90 95 5 25
10 S10 75 85 10 100
11 S11 85 90 5 25
12 S12 80 80 0 0
13 S13 70 95 25 625
14 S14 75 80 5 25
15 S15 80 95 15 225
16 S16 75 80 5 25
17 S17 80 80 0 0
18 S18 80 80 0 0
19 S19 80 85 5 25
20 S20 80 80 0 0
21 S21 80 85 5 25
22 S22 75 85 10 100
23 S23 80 85 5 25
24 S24 75 80 5 25
25 S25 75 80 5 25
26 S26 95 95 0 0
27 S27 90 95 5 25
28 S28 80 85 5 25
29 S29 80 90 10 100
30 S30 75 80 5 25
31 S31 80 95 15 225
32 S32 80 95 15 225
33 S33 75 80 5 25
47
34 S34 75 80 5 25
Amount
= 34
= 2720
= 2945
= 225
= 2775
Mean 80 86.6176 6.6176 81.6176
The total students in the experimental class
The total pre-test score of students in the experimental
class
The total of post-test score of students in the experimental
class
The total gained score of students in the experimental
class
The square of the total gained score of students in the
experimental class
Based on the table above, the writer got ,
, , . The result will be used to find
out the t-test.
Table 4.9
The Students’ Gained Score in Class X MIPA 1
(The Control Class)
Number Students Pre-test Post-test Gained
Score Y2
Y1 Y2
1 S1 80 85 5 25
2 S2 65 70 5 25
3 S3 90 95 5 25
48
4 S4 80 90 10 100
5 S5 80 80 0 0
6 S6 80 90 10 100
7 S7 75 85 10 100
8 S8 50 65 15 225
9 S9 85 85 0 0
10 S10 80 80 0 0
11 S11 90 95 5 25
12 S12 80 90 10 100
13 S13 75 90 15 225
14 S14 65 65 0 0
15 S15 80 85 5 25
16 S16 50 65 15 225
17 S17 85 85 0 0
18 S18 80 90 10 100
19 S19 85 85 0 0
20 S20 50 70 20 400
21 S21 65 80 15 225
22 S22 65 70 5 25
23 S23 80 90 10 100
24 S24 85 90 5 25
25 S25 65 65 0 0
26 S26 65 65 0 0
Amount
= 26
= 1930
= 2105
= 175
= 2075
49
Mean 74.4 80.9615 6.7307 79.8076
The total students in the control class
The total pre-test score of students in the control class
The total of post-test score of students in the control class
The total gained score of students in the control class
The square of the total gained score of students in the
control class
Based on the table above, the writer got ,
, , . The result will be used to find
out the t-test
After analyzing the data, the next procedure of this research is
analyzing the data of students‘ scores, from the result of pre-test
and post-test of both experimental class and control class. The
writer calculated the data by using t-test formula with significance
level 5% into some steps as follows:
1) Determine mean of variable X with formula:
2) Determine mean of variable Y with formula:
3) Determine standard deviation variable X with formula:
50
4) Determine standard deviation variable Y with formula:
5) Determine standard error of variable X with formula:
6) Determine standard error of variable Y with formula:
7) Determine standard error means of differences mean of
variable X and variable Y, with formula:
8) Determining t0 with formula:
9) Determining t-table in significance level 5% with
Degree of Freedom (df):
51
df = ( N1 + N2 ) – 2
= ( 34 + 26 ) – 2
= 60 – 2
= 56
The value of df is 56 at degree of significance 5% or t-table is
1.672. The writer tested the hypothesis based on the statistical
hypothesis as follows:
1. If t0 > tt : The null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected and the
alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. So, there is an
effectiveness of using Quantum Thinker model in teaching
reading comprehension at tenth grade students of SMA Gita
Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
2. If t0 < tt : The null hypothesis (Ho) was accepted and the
alternative hypothesis (Ha) is rejected. So, there is no
effectiveness of using Quantum Thinker model in teaching
reading comprehension at tenth grade students of SMA Gita
Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
10) The testing of hypothesis
(Ha) = 2.079 > 1.672
From the calculated above, the writer assumed a hypothesis
of the research that ―Quantum Thinker model is effective in teaching
reading comprehension‖.
The result calculating the data is t0 = 2.079 and tt = 1.672
means, t0 is higher than tt in significance level 5%. So, the null
hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted.
52
B. Interpretations
Based on the data collected that was taken from 34 students in
experimental class, it could be explained that the mean of pre-test
before using Quantum Thinker model in teaching reading
comprehension is 80 with the lowest score of pre-test is 70 and the
highest score of pre-test is 95. Meanwhile, the mean of post-test after
giving treatments using Quantum Thinker model in teaching reading
comprehension is 86.7 with the lowest score of post-test is 80 and the
highest score of post-test is 95. So, the writer got the mean of gained
score 225.
Meanwhile, the description of students‘ score in control class that
was taken from 26 students, it could be explained that the mean of
pre-test is 74.4 with the lowest score of pre-test is 50 and the highest
score of pre-test is 90. Meanwhile, the mean of post-test after teaching
reading comprehension with traditional model is 80.9 with the lowest
score of post-test is 65 and the highest score of post-test is 95. So, the
writer got the mean of gained score is 175.
Based on the result of the mean score in each classes (the
experimental and the control class), it is obtained the t-observation (to) is
2.079, meanwhile the t-table (tt) of df is 56 in significance level 5% is
1.672 it means t-observation (to) is higher than t-table (tt). So, the
alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho)
is rejected, because to > tt (2.079 > 1.672). So, there is difference
significant between the students‘ score in reading comprehension by
53
using Quantum Thinker model and the students‘ score in reading
comprehension without using Quantum Thinker model at tenth grade
students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta. It means that the using Quantum
Thinker model in teaching reading comprehension at tenth grade
students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta are effective.
Based on the data description, it concluded that the scores of
students who have been taught by using Quantum Thinker model in
teaching reading comprehension is higher than the scores of students
who have been taught without Quantum Thinker model. It proved that
Quantum Thinker model is effective in teaching reading
comprehension.
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
A. Conclusions
Based on the research carried out in tenth grade students of SMA
Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta, it can be concluded that the Quantum Thinker
model is more effective in teaching reading comprehension than
teaching reading comprehension with traditional model. It can be seen
from the result of research analysis in the experimental class and the
control class, it is obtained the t-observation (to) is 2.079, meanwhile the
54
t-table (tt) is 1.672 at significance level 5%. It means t-observation (to)
higher than t-table (tt). So, the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted
and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected because to > tt (2.079 > 1.672).
So, there is difference significant between the students‘ score in
reading comprehension by using Quantum Thinker model and the
students‘ score in reading comprehension without using Quantum
Thinker model in tenth grade students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
Therefore, this research has proved that using Quantum Thinker is an
effective model in teaching students‘ reading comprehension at tenth
grade students of SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta.
B. Suggestions
The writer would like to give some suggestion, as follow:
1. For School
School should provide some media teaching such as projector or
LCD in every class, computer, laboratory, etc. to support the
teaching and learning process.
2. For Students
Students should have good motivation and more creative in
learning English especially in reading comprehension. They should
study hard in order to understand the material and get good score.
They also should enrich their vocabulary through all models. If their
vocabulary is good, they can translate both word and sentence
easily.
3. For Teacher
55
Teacher teaching English to tenth grade students is not an easy
work. The teacher should give something creative and innovative in
teaching reading comprehension in order to motivated students to
read well and seriously. The teacher should enrich their vocabulary
in order to make the students solve their problem in reading both
word and sentence. The last is the teacher should use variety of
media to make the learning process fun, so that the students feel
easy to understand the material. Besides that the teacher can be
use Quantum Thinker as a model in teaching reading
comprehension.
4. For Other Researchers
The researcher realizes that this research paper is not perfect,
there are many weaknesses because of the limited skill of the
writer. Hopefully, this research can be used as the reference for
helping other researchers who want complete the research in
different point.
56
REFERENCES
Bouchard, Margaret. (2005). Comprehension Strategies for English Language Learners. New York: Scholasctic, Inc.
Blum, Mark E. (2006). Continuity, Quantum, Continuum, and Dialectic: The Foundational Logics of Western Historical Thinking. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Connelly, Josh. (2016). Effect of Wh-Question Graphic Organizer on Reading Comprehension in Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. [available at: http:// mds.marshall.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1988&context=etd] [retrieved on August 24, 2016].
Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design International Student Edition; Qualitative, Quantitative, Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Ed. London: Sage Publications.
57
Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th Ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Copeland, Matt. (2005). Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking in Middle and High School. USA: Stenhouse Publisher.
DePoter, Bobbi. (2009). Quantum Thinker: Melatih Otak Berfikir Efektif dan Kreatif. Bandung: Kaifa Mizan Pustaka.
DePorter, Bobbi., Barbara K. Given. (2015). Excellence in Teaching and Learning: The Quantum Learning System. USA: Learning Forum Publications.
Duffy, Gerald G. (2009). Explaining Reading: A Resource for Teaching Concepts, Skills and Strategies. 2th Ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
Fraenkel, Jack., Helen Hyun and Norman Wallen. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education with Connect Access Card. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Grabe, William., Fredericka L Stoller. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Gunarhadi., Mustapa Kassim and Abdull Sukor Shaari. (2014). The Impact of Quantum Teaching Strategy on Students Academic Achievements and Self-Esteem in Inclusive Schools. [available at: http://mjli.uum.edu.my/images/pdf/11mjli/10theimpactofquantum.pd f] [retrieved on October 25, 2016]
Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). How to Teach English. New edition. New York: Longman.
Israel, Susan E., Gerald G. Duffy. 2009. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. New York: Routledge.
Junaidi. (2010). Titik Persentase Distribusi t : d.f. = 1 – 200. [available at: http://junaidichaniago.wordpress.com] [retrieved on November 12, 2016]
Lichtman, Marilyn. (2013). Qualitative Research in Education A User’s Guide. USA: SAGE.
McDonough, Jo., Christopher Shaw. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT. New Jersey: Blackwell publishing.
McIntyre, Ellen., Nancy Hulan and Vicky Layne. (2011). Reading Instruction for Diverse Classrooms. New York: The Guildford Press.
58
McNamara, Danielle S. (2007). Reading Comprehension Strategies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nation, I.S.P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York: Routledge.
Nunan, David. (2006). Practical Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Omaggio, Alice C. (1986). Teaching Language in Context. Boston: Heinle & Hainle Publishers, Inc.
Ruggiero, Vincent Ryan. (2008). Becoming a Critical Thinker. 6th Ed. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing.
Scanlon, Dona M., Kimberly L Anderson and Joan M. Sweeney. (2010). Early Intervention for Reading Difficulties. New York: The Gulford Press.
Sheng, H. (2000). A Cognitive Model for Teaching Reading Comprehension. [available at: http:// forum.state.gov] [retrieved on May 5, 2016]
Sudijono, Annas. (2011). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Yasser, Akhmad., Sukestiyarno and Masrukan. (2014). Learning Quantum Teaching Model with ATONG approach School Program of Integrated Valid to Improve Character and Critical Thinking in Probability Material. [available at: http://icmseunnes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/15.pdf] [retrieved on October 25, 2016]
59
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS EXPERIMENT)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing People
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
60
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. Mendengarkan Pengertian
Descriptive text merupakan jenis teks yang banyak
digunakan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari dalam menggambarkan
benda, tempat, manusia, hewan dan lain sebagainya.
Descriptive text adalah sebuah teks bahasa Inggris untuk
menggambarkan seperti apa benda atau mahkluk hidup yang
kita deskripsikan, baik secara kenampakan, bau, suara, atau
tekstur dari benda atau makhluk hidup tersebut.
Descriptive text is a text which says what a person or a thing
is like, its purpose is to describe and reveal a particular person,
place, or thing.
2. The Generic Structure of Descriptive Text
Descriptive text has structure as below:
a. Identification; identifying the phenomenon to be described.
b. Description; describing the phenomenon in parts, qualities,
or/and characteristic.
3. The Language Features
a. The use of simple present tense
- Word order of questions with Do and Does
Do/Does Subject Verb* the Rest of
the sentence
Do I / you / we / they have / need want etc.
a new bike? Does he / she / it
*Verb: The verb that goes here is the base form of the
infinitive = The infinitive without TO before the verb. Instead
of the infinitive To have it is just the have part.
b. The use of compound adjective (e.g. : brownish-black air,
bright eyed, bald-headed, long-legged)
4. Script dari menggambarkan orang ―Flyer of a Missing Person‖
61
The Example of Describing Person
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model Quantum Thinker.
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
15 menit
62
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional
dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk
descriptive text untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
seseorang.
Guru menjelaskan
definisi (definition),
struktur umum (generic
struktur), dan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Guru mengajarkan dan
menyediakan contoh
yang sesuai tentang
menerapkan model
Quantum Thinker
dalam pengajaran
pemahaman membaca
63
descriptive text
berdasarkan pedoman
penerapan model
Quantum Thinker
kepada peserta didik.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru menyebarkan
gambar sesuai dengan
materi yang dipelajari
dan menyampaikan
kepada peserta didik
untuk memahami
gambar tersebut.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; simple present
tense (word order of
questions with Do and
Does) and compound
adjective.
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
65 menit
64
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk membuat
beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan
dengan judul teks.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
65
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Gambar – gambar yang relevan.
3. Script bacaan.
4. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
66
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
The Example Flyer Picture of a Missing Person
67
Prediction Column
Question Answer
1)
1)
2)
2)
3)
3)
4)
4)
5)
5)
dst.
dst.
Keterangan:
*pada lembar kolom prediksi, siswa membuat beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan dengan judul teks, kemudian siswa mencari ide
sebanyak yang mereka bisa untuk mejawab pertanyaan mereka.
Catatan: dst (dan seterusnya), e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 31 Oktober 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
68
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS EXPERIMENT)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
69
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Features
a. The use of interrogative words and sentence
- Interrogative words (e.g. : what?, who?, really?, how?)
- Interrogative Words:
Present tense
Auxiliary/to be + subject + verb 1 + … + ? or
WH-question + auxiliary/to be + subject + verb + … + ?
Examples
Simple Present
How is she now? (WH + to be + S + adverb + ?)
What is the next? (WH + to be + adverb + ?)
Is she okay? (to be + S + adjective + ?)
- Primary auxiliaries (e.g. : do/does/did, has/have, be)
- Modal auxiliaries (e.g. : can/could, may/might, shall/
should, will/would, must, etc)
- To be (verb be): is/am/are
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Semarang‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia English Indonesia
approximately berkisar honour menghormati
climate iklim mayor walikota
coast pantai predominantly berkisar
built dibangun roundabout bundaran
boasts memiliki surrounded
(surround) dikelilingi
headed (head) dikepalai struggle perjuangan
The Example of Describing Place
70
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model Quantum Thinker.
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
15 menit
71
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional
dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk
descriptive text untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Guru mengajarkan dan
menyediakan contoh
yang sesuai tentang
menerapkan model
Quantum Thinker
dalam pengajaran
pemahaman membaca
descriptive text
berdasarkan pedoman
penerapan model
Quantum Thinker
72
kepada peserta didik.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru menyebarkan
gambar sesuai dengan
materi yang dipelajari
dan menyampaikan
kepada peserta didik
untuk memahami
gambar tersebut.
Guru membahas dan
mengembangkan kosa
kata dan tata bahasa;
simple present tense
(interrogative words and
sentence).
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk membuat
beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan
dengan judul teks.
65 menit
73
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
10 menit
74
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Gambar – gambar yang relevan.
3. Script bacaan.
4. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
75
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
The Example Picture of Semarang
Prediction Column
Question Answer
1)
1)
2)
2)
3)
3)
4)
4)
5)
5)
76
dst.
dst.
Keterangan:
*pada lembar kolom prediksi, siswa membuat beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan dengan judul teks, kemudian siswa mencari ide
sebanyak yang mereka bisa untuk mejawab pertanyaan mereka.
Catatan: dst (dan seterusnya), e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 7 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari
NIM. 2012850050
77
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS EXPERIMENT)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
78
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Features
a. Focus on one specific object
b. The Use of Simple Present Tense
Pattern :
(+) S + V1 s/es
Example : They write a letter
(-) S + do/does + not + V1
Example : I do not bring money.
(?) Do/does + S + V1
Example : Does she go to campus?
c. The Use of Adjectives (e.g. : thick, long, funny, love, etc)
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Borobudur Temple‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia English Indonesia
abandoned
(abandon) ditinggalkan similar mirip
adorned
(adorn) dihiasi
surrounded
(surround) dikelilingi
bell-shaped berbentuk
lonceng stone batu
crowned
(crown) dimahkotai stairway tangga
excavated
(excavate) digali treasure harta
extend meluas universe alam
semesta
partially sebagian valuable berharga
shiren kuil well-known terkenal
The Example of Describing Place
79
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model Quantum Thinker.
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional
dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk
descriptive text untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
15 menit
80
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Guru mengajarkan dan
menyediakan contoh
yang sesuai tentang
menerapkan model
Quantum Thinker
dalam pengajaran
pemahaman membaca
descriptive text
berdasarkan pedoman
penerapan model
Quantum Thinker
kepada peserta didik.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru menyebarkan
gambar sesuai dengan
materi yang dipelajari
dan menyampaikan
kepada peserta didik
untuk memahami
65 menit
81
gambar tersebut.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; simple present
tense and adjectives.
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk membuat
beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan
dengan judul teks.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
82
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
83
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Gambar – gambar yang relevan.
3. Script bacaan.
4. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
The Example Picture of Borobudur Temple
84
Prediction Column
Question Answer
1)
1)
2)
2)
3)
3)
4)
4)
5)
5)
dst.
dst.
Keterangan:
*pada lembar kolom prediksi, siswa membuat beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan dengan judul teks, kemudian siswa mencari ide
sebanyak yang mereka bisa untuk mejawab pertanyaan mereka.
Catatan: dst (dan seterusnya), e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 14 November 2016
85
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS EXPERIMENT)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
86
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Feature
a. The use of preposition of place (position and direction)
(e.g. : the apple is on the plate, the boy is reading a book
under a tree)
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Purna Bhakti Pertiwi
Museum‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia
appealing menarik
colleague rekan kerja
corner penjuru
glimpse melihat sekilas
perverse menyimpang
struggle perjuangan
The Example of Describing Place
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model Quantum Thinker.
87
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional
dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk
descriptive text untuk
berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Guru mengajarkan dan
menyediakan contoh
yang sesuai tentang
menerapkan model
Quantum Thinker
dalam pengajaran
15 menit
88
pemahaman membaca
descriptive text
berdasarkan pedoman
penerapan model
Quantum Thinker
kepada peserta didik.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru menyebarkan
gambar sesuai dengan
materi yang dipelajari
dan menyampaikan
kepada peserta didik
untuk memahami
gambar tersebut.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; preposition of
place (position and
direction).
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru meminta peserta
65 menit
89
didik untuk membuat
beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan
dengan judul teks.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
90
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Gambar – gambar yang relevan.
3. Script bacaan.
4. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
91
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
The Example Picture of Purna Bhakti Pertiwi Museum
Prediction Column
Question Answer
1)
1)
2)
2)
3)
3)
4)
4)
92
5)
5)
dst.
dst.
Keterangan:
*pada lembar kolom prediksi, siswa membuat beberapa pertanyaan
yang berhubungan dengan judul teks, kemudian siswa mencari ide
sebanyak yang mereka bisa untuk mejawab pertanyaan mereka.
Catatan: dst (dan seterusnya), e.g. (misalnya)
Jakarta, 21 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari
NIM. 2012850050
93
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS KONTROL)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing People
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
XI. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
XII. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
XIII. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
XIV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
5. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
6. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
94
7. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
8. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
XV. Materi Pembelajaran
5. Mendengarkan Pengertian
Descriptive text merupakan jenis teks yang banyak
digunakan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari dalam menggambarkan
benda, tempat, manusia, hewan dan lain sebagainya.
Descriptive text adalah sebuah teks bahasa Inggris untuk
menggambarkan seperti apa benda atau mahkluk hidup yang
kita deskripsikan, baik secara kenampakan, bau, suara, atau
tekstur dari benda atau makhluk hidup tersebut.
Descriptive text is a text which says what a person or a thing
is like, its purpose is to describe and reveal a particular person,
place, or thing.
6. The Generic Structure of Descriptive Text
Descriptive text has structure as below :
c. Identification; identifying the phenomenon to be described.
d. Description; describing the phenomenon in parts, qualities,
or/and characteristic.
7. The Language Features
c. The use of simple present tense
- Word order of questions with Do and Does
Do/Does Subject Verb* the Rest of
the sentence
Do I / you / we / they have / need want etc.
a new bike? Does he / she / it
*Verb : The verb that goes here is the base form of the
infinitive = The infinitive without TO before the verb. Instead
of the infinitive To have it is just the have part.
d. The use of compound adjective (e.g. : brownish-black air,
bright eyed, bald-headed, long-legged)
8. Script dari menggambarkan orang ―Flyer of a Missing Person‖
95
The Example of Describing Person
Now, answer the questions based on the text.
1. What is the text about?
2. What is the name of the missing person?
3. What is his complexion like?
4. How old is he?
5. What is his eye color?
6. What is his hair like?
7. What is his address?
96
8. What time was he last seen?
9. What was he wearing?
10. If someone meets this person, what should he she do?
XVI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model tradisional:
Advise
Discussion
Question and answer
XVII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan d) Memberi Salam
e) Tegur Sapa
f) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional dan
esai pendek sederhana
berbentuk descriptive
text untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
15 menit
97
mendeskripsikan
seseorang.
Guru menjelaskan
definisi (definition),
struktur umum (generic
struktur), dan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru memberikan
stimulus berupa
pemberian materi
tentang descriptive text.
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk
mendiskusikan materi
bersama.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; simple present
tense (word order of
questions with Do and
Does) and compound
adjective.
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
65 menit
98
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik melalui
pemberian soal latihan.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
99
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
XVIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
5. Buku teks yang relevan.
6. Script bacaan.
7. Papan tulis.
XIX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
4. Teknik : Tes tertulis
5. Bentuk : Esai
6. Instrument : Terlampir
XX. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
100
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
101
Answer Key
1. It is about description of a missing person
2. The name is James Lewis
3. It is white-skinned
4. His age is 67th
5. Eye color is Brown
6. His hair is Grayish-haired
7. His residence in the 2800 block of Pennsylvania Avenue, SE
8. At approximately 12.30 p.m., on Saturday, 11 March 2014
9. Last seen wearing blue jeans and grey/blue shirt
10. Report to Washington, DC-The Metropolitan Police Department
Catatan: e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 2 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari NIM. 2012850050
102
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS KONTROL)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
103
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Features
a. The use of interrogative words and sentence
- Interrogative words (e.g. : what?, who?, really?, how?)
- Interrogative Words:
Present tense
Auxiliary/to be + subject + verb 1 + … + ? or
WH-question + auxiliary/to be + subject + verb + … + ?
Examples
Simple Present
How is she now? (WH + to be + S + adverb + ?)
What is the next? (WH + to be + adverb + ?)
Is she okay? (to be + S + adjective + ?)
- Primary auxiliaries (e.g. : do/does/did, has/have, be)
- Modal auxiliaries (e.g. : can/could, may/might,
shall/should, will/would, must, etc)
- To be (verb be): is/am/are
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Semarang‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia English Indonesia
approximately berkisar honour menghormati
climate iklim mayor walikota
coast pantai predominantly berkisar
built dibangun roundabout bundaran
boasts memiliki surrounded
(surround) dikelilingi
headed (head) dikepalai struggle perjuangan
104
The Example of Describing Place
Now, complete the table with the 10 information in the text.
1. Population : ____________________
2. Location : ____________________
3. Seasons : ____________________
4. : ____________________
5. : ____________________
6. : ____________________
7. : ____________________
105
8. : ____________________
9. : ____________________
10. : ____________________
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model tradisional:
Advise
Discussion
Question and answer
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional dan
esai pendek sederhana
berbentuk descriptive
text untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
15 menit
106
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru memberikan
stimulus berupa
pemberian materi
tentang descriptive text.
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk
mendiskusikan materi
bersama.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; simple present
tense (interrogative
words and sentence).
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik melalui
65 menit
107
pemberian soal latihan.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan 10 menit
108
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Script bacaan.
3. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
109
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
110
Answer Key
1. 1,5 million people
2. City on the north coast of the island Java, Indonesia
3. Semarang features a tropical wet and dry climate, with distinct
wet and dry season
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Catatan: e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 9 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari NIM. 2012850050
111
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS KONTROL)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
112
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Features
a. Focus on one specific object
b. The Use of Simple Present Tense
Pattern :
(+) S + V1 s/es
Example : They write a letter
(-) S + do/does + not + V1
Example : I do not bring money.
(?) Do/does + S + V1
Example : Does she go to campus?
c. The Use of Adjectives (e.g. : thick, long, funny, love, etc)
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Borobudur Temple‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia English Indonesia
abandoned
(abandon) ditinggalkan similar mirip
adorned
(adorn) dihiasi
surrounded
(surround) dikelilingi
bell-shaped berbentuk
lonceng stone batu
crowned
(crown) dimahkotai stairway tangga
excavated
(excavate) digali treasure harta
extend meluas universe alam
semesta
partially sebagian valuable berharga
shiren kuil well-known terkenal
113
The Example of Describing Place
Now, answer the following questions.
1. What is the text telling you about?
2. What is the purpose of the writer writing this text?
3. When was Borobudur temple built?
4. What makes Borobudur temple well-known?
5. What specific things does Borobudur have?
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model tradisional:
Advise
Discussion
Question and answer
114
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional dan
esai pendek sederhana
berbentuk descriptive
text untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
15 menit
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru memberikan
stimulus berupa
pemberian materi
tentang descriptive text.
65 menit
115
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk
mendiskusikan materi
bersama.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; simple present
tense and adjectives.
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik melalui
pemberian soal latihan.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
116
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
117
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Script bacaan.
3. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
118
Answer Key
1. It is descriptive text about describing place of Borobudur temple
2. It is introduce Borobudur temple to the readers
3. Borobudur temple built in the 9th century under the Syailendra
Java
4. The design of Borobudur, a temple-mountain symbolizing the
structure of the universe, is similar to the temples built at
Angkor, Cambodia and Borobudur temple is a valuable treasure
for Indonesia people
5. Borobudur temple influenced by the Gupta architecture of India,
the temple is constructed on a hill 46 m (150 ft) high and
consists of eight steps like stone terraces, one on top of the
other. The first five terraces are square and surrounded by walls
adorned with Buddhist sculpture in bas-relief; the upper three
are circular, each with a circle of bell-shaped stupas (Buddhist
shrines). The entire edifice is crowned by a large stupa at the
119
center of the top circle. The way to the summit extends through
some 4.8 km (Some 3 mi) of passages and stairways. The
design of Borobudur, a temple-mountain symbolizing the
structure of the universe, is similar to the temples built at
Angkor, Cambodia
Catatan: e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
Jakarta, 16 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari NIM. 2012850050
120
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP KELAS KONTROL)
Nama sekolah : SMA Gita Kirtti 3 Jakarta
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas/Semester : X (Sepuluh) / 1
Aspek/Skill : Membaca
Jenis Teks : Descriptive Text
Tema : Describing Place
Alokasi Waktu : 2 x 45 menit (2x pertemuan)
I. Standar Kompetensi
Memahami makna dalam teks fungsional dan esai pendek
sederhana berbentuk descriptive text untuk berinteraksi dengan
lingkungan sekitar.
II. Kompetensi Dasar
Memahami dan merespon makna dalam bentuk teks fungsional
pendek sederhana dan langkah retorika teks tulis esai secara
akurat, lancar dan berterima untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
III. Indikator
Mampu mengidentifikasi atau memahami isi teks fungsional dalam
bentuk descriptive text.
IV. Tujuan Pembelajaran
Pada akhir pembelajaran peserta didik dapat:
1. Mengidentifikasi terhadap teks yang sudah dibaca.
2. Mengidentifikasi tujuan dalam teks yang dibaca.
3. Menggambarkan tentang descriptive text.
4. Mengidentiikasi langkah-langkah retorika dari teks.
121
V. Materi Pembelajaran
1. The Language Feature
a. The use of preposition of place (position and direction)
(e.g. : the apple is on the plate, the boy is reading a book
under a tree)
2. Script dari menggambarkan tempat ―Purna Bhakti Pertiwi
Museum‖
3. Kosa kata yang berkaitan dengan teks:
English Indonesia
appealing menarik
colleague rekan kerja
corner penjuru
glimpse melihat sekilas
perverse menyimpang
struggle perjuangan
The Example of Describing Place
Now, answer the questions based on the text.
1. What is the text about?
2. What does the writer try to describe?
122
3. The first paragraph tells the readers about _______________
4. The characteristics of Purna Bhakti Pertiwi Museum can be
found in paragraph _______________
5. The main idea of the third paragraph is _______________
VI. Model/Metode Pembelajaran
Pembelajaran menggunakan model tradisional:
Advise
Discussion
Question and answer
VII. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Kegiatan Deskripsi Kegiatan Alokasi Waktu
Pendahuluan a) Memberi Salam
b) Tegur Sapa
c) Apersepsi
Guru memotivasi
peserta didik dengan
tanya jawab mengenai
teks tulis fungsional dan
esai pendek sederhana
berbentuk descriptive
text untuk berinteraksi
dengan lingkungan
sekitar.
Guru menjelaskan
pentingnya materi yang
akan dipelajari dan
kompetensi yang harus
dikuasi. Materi ini
penting dipelajari
karena memberikan
keterampilan kepada
15 menit
123
peserta didik untuk
mendeskripsikan
tempat.
Guru menjelaskan fitur
bahasa descriptive text.
Inti Eksplorasi
Mengamati
Guru memberikan
stimulus berupa
pemberian materi
tentang descriptive text.
Guru meminta peserta
didik untuk
mendiskusikan materi
bersama.
Guru membahas dan
memberikan tata
bahasa; preposition of
place (position and
direction).
Guru memfasilitasi
interaksi antar peserta
didik serta antara
peserta didik dengan
guru, lingkungan, dan
sumber belajar lainnya.
Guru melibatkan
peserta didik secara
aktif dalam setiap
kegiatan pembelajaran.
Mengasosiasikan
Guru memfasilitasi
65 menit
124
peserta didik melalui
pemberian soal latihan.
Guru memberi
kesempatan peserta
didik untuk berpikir,
menganalisis dan
mecari ide sebanyak
yang mereka bisa untuk
menjawab pertanyaan
mereka.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik dalam
pembelajaran kooperatif
and kolaboratif.
Guru memfasilitasi
peserta didik
berkompetensi secara
sehat untuk
meningkatkan prestasi
belajar.
Konfirmasi
Guru menginformasikan
topik/materi yang
dibahas berdasarkan
teks yang telah dibaca
peserta didik tersebut.
Guru memberi
penjelasan tentang
materi tersebut.
Guru memberi
kesimpulan atas materi
tersebut.
125
Penutup Bersama-sama dengan
peserta didik membuat
rangkuman atau
kesimpulan pelajaran.
Memberikan umpan
balik terhadap proses
dan hasil pembelajaran.
Menyampaikan rencana
pembelajaran
pertemuan berikutnya.
Memberi salam.
10 menit
VIII. Alat/media/Sumber Pembelajaran
1. Buku teks yang relevan.
2. Script bacaan.
3. Papan tulis.
IX. Penilaian Hasil Belajar
1. Teknik : Tes tertulis
2. Bentuk : Esai
3. Instrument : Terlampir
X. Pedoman Penilaian
Score Value Description
80 - 100 Excellent Describing all the parts, qualities and
characteristics completely
60 - 79 Good
Describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Somewhat choppy
loosely
40 - 59 Fair Fair describing parts, qualities and
characteristics. Some are missing
126
20 - 39 Poor Poorly describing many parts, qualities
and characteristics are missing
0 - 19 Very Poor Does not describe the parts, qualities
and characteristics anymore
Instrument
Answer Key
1. It is about descriptive text
2. It is describing place about Purna Bhakti Pertiwi Museum
3. It is about a place to preserve the historical evidence of Mr.
Soeharto‘s struggle
4. In paragraph 3
5. At Purna Bhakti Pertiwi Museum consist of various kinds and
forms of the works of art, which make this museum appealing to
visit
Catatan: e.g. (misalnya), etc (dan lain-lain)
127
Jakarta, 23 November 2016
Mengetahui,
Guru Mata Pelajaran Peneliti
Nurul Fadillah S.Pd
Dwi Putri Puspitasari NIM. 2012850050
131
Number Students Pre-test Post-test
1 S1 70 95
2 S2 90 90
3 S3 80 80
4 S4 85 90
5 S5 85 90
6 S6 85 95
7 S7 80 85
132
8 S8 80 85
9 S9 90 95
10 S10 75 85
11 S11 85 90
12 S12 80 80
13 S13 70 95
14 S14 75 80
15 S15 80 95
16 S16 75 80
17 S17 80 80
18 S18 80 80
19 S19 80 85
20 S20 80 80
21 S21 80 85
22 S22 75 85
23 S23 80 85
24 S24 75 80
25 S25 75 80
26 S26 95 95
27 S27 90 95
28 S28 80 85
29 S29 80 90
30 S30 75 80
31 S31 80 95
32 S32 80 95
33 S33 75 80
34 S34 75 80
Amount 34 2720 2945
Mean 80 86.7
Number Students Pre-test Post-test
1 S1 80 85
2 S2 65 70
3 S3 90 95
4 S4 80 90
5 S5 80 80
6 S6 80 90
7 S7 75 85
8 S8 50 65
9 S9 85 85
10 S10 80 80
133
11 S11 90 95
12 S12 80 90
13 S13 75 90
14 S14 65 65
15 S15 80 85
16 S16 50 65
17 S17 85 85
18 S18 80 90
19 S19 85 85
20 S20 50 70
21 S21 65 80
22 S22 65 70
23 S23 80 90
24 S24 85 90
25 S25 65 65
26 S26 65 65
Amount 26 1930 2105
Mean 74.4 80.9
145
DATA PRIBADI
Nama : Dwi Putri Puspitasari
Tempat, Tanggal Lahir : Jakarta, 29 Oktober 1994
Jenis Kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Jl. Tanah Kusir II No. 31 Rt. 010/009 Kel.
Kebayoran Lama Selatan, Kec. Kebayoran
Lama, Jakarta Selatan 12240
Agama : Islam
Kewarganegaraan : Indonesia
RIWAYAT KELUARGA
1. Orang Tua : a. Ayah : Sugeng Priono
b. Ibu : Herlina
RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN
1. TKA At-Taubah Jakarta, tamat tahun 2000
2. TK Kartika XII-1 Jakarta, tamat tahun 2000
3. SD Negeri 05 Pagi Jakarta, tamat tahun 2006
4. SMP Al-Fajar Jakarta, tamat tahun 2009
5. SMA Negeri 7 Jakarta, tamat tahun 2012
6. Diterima di Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas
Muhammadiyah Jakarta, tahun 2012