+ All Categories
Home > Science > The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Date post: 22-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: dexter-marsh
View: 634 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
33
T he Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait… Dave Harris John Hickman Kentucky Geological Survey University of Kentucky Lexington AAPG Playmaker Forum Pittsburgh April 13, 2016
Transcript
Page 1: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait…

Dave Harris

John Hickman

Kentucky Geological

Survey

University of Kentucky

Lexington

AAPG Playmaker Forum

Pittsburgh

April 13, 2016

Page 2: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Outline of Presentation

• Rogersville geologic and geochemical framework

• Play status and recent activity

• KGS research initiatives and recent Kentucky legislation

Page 3: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Previous work

• Rome Trough Consortium (1999-2002)• Regional stratigraphic and structural study• Cross sections, core descriptions, maps, field study• Hydrocarbon and source rock geochemistry• 2004 Open-file report available at KGS• Study did not consider the unconventional resource

potential of the Rogersville Shale

• Bob Ryder (USGS) regional cross sections for Appalachian Basin– most available for download at usgs.gov

Page 4: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Middle Cambrian Paleogeography

Ron Blakey, Colorado

Plateau Geosystems,

Arizona USA

Page 5: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Rome Trough Structural Features

Page 6: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Pre-Knox Stratigraphy

• Inconsistent namesacross 3-state area

• Problems in defining Rome and Conasauga, Mt. Simon, basal sandstone

• Use of Rome inOhio (Janssens, 1973)

Page 7: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

StratigraphicProblem

1000 feet

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

4000

7000

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

Scioto Co., OH

Elliott Co., KY

Johnson Co., KY

DATUM: BASE KNOX GROUP

Kentucky River

Fault Zone

Irvine-Paint

Creek Fault

Zone

• Correlations acrossgrowth faults

• Biostrat data lacking

• Important forprediction ofreservoir and sourcedistribution

Page 8: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

Maynardville LsNolichucky Shale

Maryville Limestone

Rogersville Shale

Rutledge Ls

Pumpkin Valley Sh

Rome Formation

Rome Fm-Middle

Shady DolomiteBasal SandstonePrecambrian

Rome Fm-Lower

8000

9000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

Co

nasau

ga G

rou

pR

om

e F

m.

Pre-Knox

Type Log

U.S. Signal

Elkhorn Coal

Johnson Co.

Kentucky

Gamma ray shaded

By log-calculated

lithologies

Page 9: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

FEET

0 89,186

PETRA 9/30/2004 5:37:50 PM

Cross Section Index Map

North

South

SW

NE

Page 10: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Kentucky River Fault Zone

Irvine-Paint Creek shelf

Irvine-Paint Creek Fault Zone

RowanKY Elliott

KY

Elliott

KY MorganKY

MorganKY

Wolfe

KY

Breathitt

KY

Perry

KY

Leslie

KY

<7.63MI> <7.86MI> <7.17MI> <16.66MI> <5.91MI> <12.60MI> <11.93MI> <11.95MI>

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0 200

GR

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3 -0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

60

00

70

00

70

00

80

00

70

00

70

00

80

00

90

00

10

00

01

10

00

12

00

0

70

00

80

00

90

00

10

00

01

10

00

80

00

90

00

80

00

90

00

North South

1,000 feetC

ON

AS

AU

GA

RO

ME

Grenville

Basement

Page 11: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

PulaskiKY

JacksonKY

LeeKY

WolfeKY Johnson

KY MingoWV

LincolnWV

<42.20MI> <19.75MI> <20.67MI> <35.95MI> <30.91MI> <24.92MI>

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0 200

GR

2 3

RHOB

0.3-0.1

NPHI30

00

40

00

50

00

60

00

70

00

80

00

90

00

40

00

50

00

60

00

70

00

80

00

90

00

10

000

30

00

40

00

50

00

60

00

70

00

80

00

90

00

50

00

60

00

70

00

80

00

90

00

10

000

11

000

12

000

70

00

80

00

90

00

10

000

11

000

12

000

13

000

14

000

11

000

12

000

13

000

14

000

15

000

16

000

17

000

18

000

19

000

11

000

12

000

13

000

14

000

15

000

16

000

17

000

18

000

19

000

HS=175000

SW NE

PETRA 10/1/2004 6:29:01 PM (cross section.CST)

1,000 feet

Rome

Page 12: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

East Tennessee Conasauga Outcrops

From Rankey and

others, 1994

• Large scale

depositional

cycles

• Carbonate

ramp thick-

ens to east

• Intrashelf

shale basin

to west

Page 13: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Wayne

Lawrence

Elliott

Carter

Morgan

JohnsonMartinFEET

0 34,330

PETRA 4/25/2014 6:18:23 PM

Rome Trough Production

Inland 529 White(32 bbl/day Maryville)

Exxon Smith

Rogersville

core

Homer Field Carson 1 Kazee

11MMCFD

Ashland 1 Williams(1MMCFD Nolichucky Sh.)

Faults: SurfaceBasement

Page 14: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Exxon #1 Smith

core:

11,191-11,200’

Page 15: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Cambrian Source Rocks in Rome Trough

Page 16: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

RTC Maturity and Kerogen Data

Page 17: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

min0 10 20 30 40 50

pA

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

FID1 A, (Z:\HP6890~1\HPCHEM\1\DATA\H01-1218\WE32682A.D)

n-C

8

n-C

9

n-C

10

n-C

11

n-C

12 i-

C13

i-C

14 n

-C13

i-C

15 n

-C14

i-C

16 n

-C15

n-C

16 i-

C18

n-C

17 P

r

n-C

18 P

hy

n-C

19

n-C

20

n-C

21

n-C

22

n-C

23

n-C

24

n-C

25

n-C

26

n-C

27

n-C

28

n-C

29

n-C

30

n-C

31

n-C

32

n-C

33

n-C

34

19

17

1513

pr

ph

Bitumen Extract -Rogersville Shale

No. 1 SmithWayne Co., WV

11,161.5 ft

Oil – Source Rock Correlation15

13

17

19

ph

pr

Oil*– Maryville Limestone No. 529 WhiteBoyd Co., Ky

7,574 – 7,598 ft

*Data provided by Richard W. Beardsley

Page 18: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Additional TOC/Rock-Eval Data• GeoMark, 2007

• Talisman, 2009

– 96 samples, 8 wells, no reliable results > 1%

• Petro-Hunt, 2011

– 137 samples, 12 Ky. Wells, highest TOC was 0.24%

• Cimarex data (2012 and 2014)

– Sampled Rogersville cuttings in 12 wells

– Of 131 samples, only 4 had TOC > 1% (Exxon Smith and Ashland Williams wells)

Page 19: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

7000.0

8000.0

9000.0

10000.0

11000.0

12000.0

13000.0

14000.0

15000.0

16000.0

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Dep

th (

ft)

Total Organic Carbon (percent)

Rogersville Shale (core)

Rogersville Shale(cuttings)

Rogersville TOC: sample type

Exxon

Smith

core

Page 20: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Rogersville Shale Summary

• 5,000 to 10,000 ft deep in eastern Kentucky

• 2–4.8% TOC in parts, and has generated gas & condensate

• Up to 1,100 ft thick in Kentucky, but limited to deeper parts of Rome Trough– not all is organic rich

Page 21: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Rogersville Play Concept

• Clues: mature source rock, a few mud logs shows, scattered deep shows and production, reports of overpressure (Gates & Watson, 1975, SPE 5447)

• Challenges: mostly 1970’s-vintage logs, poor log data due to borehole washouts, few cores, limited production, precipitous fall in oil and gas prices

Page 22: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Keys to proving the concept

• Confidence in one good data point (Exxon core)

• Explaining other discouraging TOC results

• Targeting wet gas/condensate area for liquids

• Exploiting gray area in regs to keep data tight for 5 years–stratigraphic test drilling permits

• Securing strong lease position after first well

Page 23: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Current Play Status• Five wells drilled to date

– Bruin Expl. (Cimarex): apparent discovery (shut-in) Lawrence Co., Kentucky

– Cabot Oil & Gas: 1 vertical, Putnam Co., West Virginia, producing dry gas, zone unknown

– Chesapeake Energy: 2 verticals (shut-in), Lawrence County, Kentucky

– Horiz. Tech. Energy (EQT): 1 horizontal, (under evaluation?), Johnson Co., KY

• Three undrilled horizontal lateral permits

• Activity on hold due to low prices

Page 24: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Chesapeake LAW1 Northup Est

Bruin Expl 1 Walbridge

Hard Rock Expl 1 Young, GD

Cabot 50 Amherst Industries

Chesapeake LAW1 Stephens, J

Bruin Expl 1 Young, S

Horiz. Tech Energy 572360 EQT

Page 25: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Bruin #1 YoungLawrence County

• Slickwater frac (677,000 gal fluid, 600,000 lb sand), 576 ft interval

• Tested 115 MCFPD and 19 BOPD (5/6/2014), 2599 psi SIP

• Shut-in 5/30/2014

• 4,800 ft horizontal lateral permitted

Corniferous

Rose Hill Shale

Clays Ferry &Lexington

Knox

Nolichucky

Maryville

Conasauga

Rogersville

Conasauga

1,968

2,599

3,819

5,333

7,072

7,613

9,652

10,468

11,044

TD 11,967, Rome

Page 26: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Resulting Leasing Boom

• Key Ky. counties:

Johnson, Magoffin,

Lawrence

• More than 4,275 deep

leases in 18 months

ending 6/15

• Prices per acre: $250-

300 ($25-50 was

common 5 years ago)

Wes Cate,

Global Natural Resource Mgmt, 2015

Page 27: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Cabot #50 Amherst Industries,Putnam County, WV

• Completed in 2015; producing dry gas from ??

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

Dec

Mo

nth

ly G

as (

MM

CF)

079-01538 Cabot 50 Amherst Industries

Actual

Hyperbolic decline

Qt=Qi/((1+0.67*0.5*t)^(1/0.67))

67.4

2015 | 2016

Projected

20-month

cumulative:

305 MMCFG

Decline analysis by

Brandon Nuttall, KGS

11.6

Page 28: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Other wells • Horizontal Technology Energy Corp. (EQT)

– Johnson County, KY: 4,300 ft lateral drilled/tested

• Chesapeake Energy

– Two vertical wells re-permitted as oil & gas wells, the Northup as a 5,200 ft lateral

Page 29: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

KGS Research Efforts• Two monitoring programs to collect baseline

data:

– Microseismic: 12 stations installed; partnering with Cimarex Energy, Nanometrics

– Groundwater quality from domestic wells

• Establishing background data prior to development will allow recognition of natural vs. man-made events

• Goal: avoid induced seismicity, fracking concerns seen in other areas

Page 30: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

KGS Microseismic Station

Installation 10/19/2015

Chesapeake #1 Stephens

10/19/2015

Microseismic stations

Page 31: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

New Regulations: 2015• Senate Bill 186 passed

– Provides regulatory certainty for deep shale dev.

– New deep well definition (>6,000 ft)

– High-volume horizontal fracs: >80,000 gal per stage or 320,000 gal total

– For deep HVHF, notify surface owners within 1,000 ft of well head before frac, and surface water/groundwater testing required

– FracFocus disclosure required for HVHF within 90 days

Page 32: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

New Regulations: 2016

• Senate Bill 188 passed

– Clarifies confidentiality on stratigraphic test permits

– Limit of 3 years confidentiality on strat tests

– Converting strat test to oil and gas permit reduces confidentiality to 1 year (same as oil and gas permit)

Page 33: The Emerging Rogersville Shale Play: Hurry up and Wait

Conclusions

• Cambrian Rogersville Shale petroleum system exists in Rome Trough

• Rogersville unconventional play concept has been proven– economic success has not

• Data is very scarce, leading to hype and speculation

• Activity on hold due to low prices

• Play status: WOD (waiting on data)


Recommended