Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | geoffrey-allen |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
The Essential Feature of Individual Supports: Systems,
Systems, Systems
Tim Lewis, Ph.D.
University of Missouri
Barbara Mitchell
Columbia Public Schools
This morning…
• Brief overview of key features of individual PBS assessment and plan development
• Necessity of changing learning environments = need for system support
• One middle school example
Big IdeasUnderstand interaction between behavior and the
teaching environmentBehavior is functionally related to the
teaching environment• Build Positive Behavior Support Plans that teach
pro-social “replacement” behaviors • Create environments to support the use of pro-
social behaviors (practice, practice, practice)– Around individual student need / self-management– Classroom – School-wide
Basic Steps in FBA-BIP Process
1. Conduct functional behavioral assessment
2. Create plan based on functional assessment outcome
3. Develop infra-structure to support behavior change (system change)
Positive Behavior Support Plan Teach replacement behavior(s) that
result in same/similar outcomeEnvironment should not allow
problem behavior to result in previous outcomes
Ideally replacement behavior should be more efficient than problem behavior
FBA – PBS Plan Process
Success requires:1. Individual(s) with expertise in FBA-PBS2. Fluency with a clear process among all
staff whereby roles are clearly defined3. A basic understanding of Applied
Behavior Analysis (Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment) among all school staff
Essential Steps to Individual PBS Plans
1. Request for assistance 2. Operationally define problem/replacement behavior3. Background/archival data/ data collection/Environmental
Assessment4. Functional Behavioral Assessment
• Indirect measures• Direct observation
5. Develop hypothesis regarding function of problem behavior6. Develop a PBS plan
• Social skill instruction• Self management• Environmental modifications
7. Implement, Monitor and Evaluate progress
How do schools get there?
Build parallel systemic processes • Provide school/district teams with a process
to address the presenting challenge • Develop a parallel process for
districts/states to support school implementation and continue to expand with integrity
SYST
EMS
PRACTICES
DATASupportingStaff Behavior
SupportingDecisionMaking
SupportingStudent Behavior
PositiveBehaviorSupport OUTCOMES
Social Competence &Academic Achievement
Research Findings on “Scaling Up”(Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005, p. 70)
• Best evidence documents what doesn’t work:
– Information dissemination alone
– Training by itself
Research Findings on “Scaling Up”(Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005, p. 70)
• What works
– Long term, multi-level approaches
– Skills-based training
– Practice-based coaching
– Practioner performance-feedback
– Program evaluation
– Facilitative administrative practices
– Methods for systems intervention
Applied Work in Progress
Gentry Middle School
Background and Context
• PBS in Columbia Public Schools– 18 elementary buildings– 3 middle schools– 3 junior highs– 3 high school programs– 17,000 students
Gentry Middle School
• Three core teams per grade level– Five general education teachers– One special education /One paraprofessional
• Elective team
• Literacy support center
• Self-contained/Special education
• Administrative team
PBS at Gentry Year 1-2
• Universal Features– Administrative and faculty buy in– Building wide expectations (RRKS)– PBS team– Matrix
PBS at Gentry Year 3-4
• Universal Features– Lesson plans– Redesign office referral – Track discipline data– System for acknowledging (RRKS Ribbon)– Team process revisited
PBS at Gentry Year 5-6
• Universal Features– Revisit matrix– Lesson plans and teaching schedule– Behavioral expectations posted– RRKS Ribbon data collection– Assign sub-committee work
158
42
22
14 12
19
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1-3 referrals 4-6 referrals 7-9 referrals 10-15 referrals 16-20 20-45
Number of Referrals
The Saga Begins
• Student Assistance Team (SAT)– Administrator– School psychologist– Counselors– Team teacher– Behavior specialist
• Goal = Individual supports
Painful Lessons…
• Year 1: Floundering, Flailing and Failing– Inadequate universal supports– Targeted interventions not systematic or data-
based– Individual plans overwhelming and ineffective
Initial Outcomes
• Multiple changes in individual plans
• Ineffective supports for teachers and students
• Loss of time
• Increased number of referrals
• Diminished credibility
The Saga Continues
• Year 2: Reinforcements Arrive– Outside expertise– Administrative supports
• Money
• Meetings
• Melee
Building Systems
• How to get there– Clarify process for accessing support– Reorganize process for disseminating effective
practice– Provide training, tools and support
Process for Accessing Support
AIS - SAT Flowchart
RRKS Team
STAT Team
School-Wide SystemsMatrixLesson PlansSchool-Wide DataAcknowledgementCommunication
Core Team RepresentativeDistrict PBS Support
Building Administrator and Counselors
*Meets Monthly
Core Team Representative
SAT PartnerCore Team Teachers
*Meets Weekly
Core Team/ClassroomsImplement AISMonitor ProgressRefer to SAT
SAT ProcessTeacher Training and SupportTargeted InterventionsIndividual Student Plans
SAT Team
AdministratorCounselorBehavior Specialist
Process for Disseminating Practice
Provide Skills-Based Training
• Training Model– SAT members with behavior specialist
• Behavior basics and management
• SAT process
• Function-linked strategies
– SAT members with STAT team representative– SAT and STAT with core team teachers
Provide Tools
• Tools for Teachers– SAT flowchart– Pyramid to Success– RRKS TOC– AIS guide (Alternative Intervention Strategies)
Classroom Teacher IssuesOut of seat, Talking to classmates, Talking out, Off-task, Violation of class rules, Inappropriate language,
Lack of materials, Gum, Disrespect, Cheating, Tardies, Minor destruction of propertyMethod for handling student behaviors
Proactive: Positive call to parents, Use praise, Use Rewards, Daily/Weekly Goal sheets, Proximity to instructor, Provide choices, One-to-One assistance, Pre-correct for transitions/trouble situations, Regular
breaks for exercise, Give a job, RRKS Review, Reward lunch with teacher, etc.Corrective: One and only one REDIRECT, RRKS Review, Safe-seat, Buddy Room, Think Sheet, Parent Phone call, Lunch Detention, Recovery Study Hall, Removal of privilege in classroom, etc.
Team IssuesRepeated minor & major disruptions in multiple classrooms, Throwing things, Hallway/Lockers problems,
Attendance, Repeated disrespect to peers or adults, Cheating, Inappropriate to substitute, Insubordination, Chronic Disruptions
Method for handling student behaviorsProactive: Parent contact (mandatory), RRKS review, Team conference, Team conference with student, Team conference with Parents, Team conference with Administrator/Counselor, Triage in the AM with the
student, Triage at lunch with the student, Team Focus, etc.Corrective: Removal of privilege on team, Recovery Study Hall, Buddy Room, etc.
Office IssuesBus referrals, Truancy, Chronic offender, Threatening student or adult,
Fighting, Refusal to go to or Disruptive in Buddy Room, Sexual harassment, Weapons, Drug/cigarettes/ tobacco/alcohol, Assault – physical or verbal
Teacher Method for handling student behaviorsReferral Form – send student to office with completed form
Process with student before re-entry
Office Method for handling student behaviorsProactive: RRKS Review, Parent Contact
Corrective: Loss of Privilege, Saturday detention, Opportunity Center, Suspension, etc.
Pyramid to Success for All
RRKS TOC (front side)
RRKS – Time Out of Class Code: _____
Student: _________________________ Date:______________________
Incident Time: ____________________# of min. out of rm.: __________
Teacher: _______________________Subject: ____________________
What did you do/not do that got you sent out of class? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Circle the RRKS expectation that was not followed:Respect Responsible Kind Safe
What will you do differently next time?______________________________________
RRKS TOC (back side)
Processing Checklist:Processing data & time:
• Review with the student reason he/she was sent out.
• Teach & practice replacement behavior.
• Provide positive reinforcement for replacement behavior.
• Check the setting in which the behavior occurred.
Whole group instruction
Small group instruction
Individual work
Working with peers
Alone
1-on-1 instruction
Interacting with peers
Other: Please identify belowMinor List: Circle the appropriate code
(MDD) Defiance/Disrespect/Non-compliance
(MDS) Disruption
(MI) Inappropriate Verbal Language
( MO) Other (MPC) Phys. Contact
(MP) Property Misuse
Provide Ongoing Support
• Weekly, skills-based, with feedback
• Periodic, intensive, with follow-up
• Example: 2007-08 Sessions• Classroom/team universals
• AIS process
• Follow-up AIS
• Peer observations
• Feedback and systems maintenance
A Happy Ending…
• Outcomes to Date– Increased implementation of universals– Paradigm shift– Building infra-structure to sustain individual
supports
How do schools get there?
Build parallel systemic processes • Provide school/district teams with a process to
address the presenting challenge • Develop a parallel process for districts/states to
support school implementation and continue to expand with integrity
Pulling It All Together
• Success in building sustained systems– Long-term, multi-level approach– Skills-based training– Practice-based coaching– Practitioner performance-feedback– Program evaluation– Facilitative administrative practices– Methods for systems intervention
Big IdeasUnderstand interaction between behavior and the
teaching environmentBehavior is functionally related to the teaching environment
• Build Positive Behavior Support Plans that teach pro-social “replacement” behaviors
• Create environments to support the use of pro-social behaviors– Around individual student need / self-management– Classroom – School-wide